143 YEARS AGO TODAY. CUSTER SOUGHT GLORY

WPCNR MILESTONES. By John F. Bailey. June 25, 2018 Reprinted from the WPCNR archive:   One hundred forty-three years ago today in the
midsummer sweltering heat of the Dakota Badlands, 
Major General George Armstrong Custer and 600 Cavalrymen of the U.S.
Seventh Cavalry were converging to attack a contingent of 2,000 Sioux
and Cheyenne Indians encamped on the Little Big Horn River.

Custer’s troops were in the lead.

S
Sighting the Enemy Custer, whose strength as a commander was
willingness to engage the enemy by surprise has long been criticized by
historians and military experts for disobeying the command of his
superior General Alfred H. Terry, (commander of the Little Big Horn
campaign), who warned Custer to wait until Terry’s forces arrived to join him before Custer launched any attack.

At about 5 PM this afternoon  today  it was the waning afternoon, 143
years ago, 1876.  225 troopers, Custer, and Mark Kellogg, the Associated
Press correspondent (one of the first “embedded correspondents”) lay
dead strewn across the ridges of the Little Big Horn Valley.

The Indians had so much respect for Reporter Kellogg’s talent, they left
his body alone. To the Sioux, Mr. Kellogg was known as “The Man who
could make paper talk.”

Mr. Kellogg’s foolscap (copy paper) littered the horror of the battlefield.
Kellog was given a mule to ride by General Terry, and rode into battle
with Custer.

That afternoon, 143 years ago today, the superior Indian force had dealt
the American military its most infamous defeat to date, which would be
chronicled again and again.

Custer’s accomplishments as a military commander though have
suffered as a result of this alleged rash and ill-advised attack.

However, the battle is instructive for all who command, (no matter what position of command they hold), to pay attention to their scouting
reports, and above all conduct scouting forays, and to ignore whatever
personal gains might be achieved by a personally attractive course of
action (if you are successful).

Allegedly, Custer had seen a possible victory lead by himself over the
Sioux as a stepping stone to national office.

Instead, he died in action — one of the few U.S. Army Generals to do so.

Few know today, as the statue of General Custer in his hometown of
Monroe, Michigan, says how Custer was instrumental in forcing General Robert E. Lee to surrender by blocking Lee’s retreat at Appomattox in
1865.

Custer’s defeat may have been inevitable but the actions of Major
Reno’s premature breaking off  his initial attack on the Indian
encampment, a disastrous premature, cut-and-run retreat, did not help
Custer’s chances.

Reno’s retreat allowed the counterattacking indians to turn all their force on Custer’s force, getting behind him,  surrounding Custer and his
command and killing them all within an hour.

Custer’s glory achieved through his death is a sobering reminder every
year for those who ignore facts confronting them, and underestimate
adversaries, and discount adverse conditions.

We should not forget though that Custer was attempting to achieve his
mission. No one can say what really motivated him 143 years ago today
in the early afternoon when he launched his attack.

Second-guessing is the sport of the armchair historians and military
strategists who have the evidence of the result.

Blame is easily distributed. That is the loneliness of command. Combat.
Decisions. Risks. Surprise. They are the stuff that leaders have to deal
with.

On this day, we should look back and remember the courage it took to
engage.

Remember the bravery the Seventh Calvary displayed in defeat (despite
Indian reports of many committing suicide).

Soldiers today demonstrate this courage every day.

We need to admire that courage. I cannot fathom what it takes to be able to be courageous like this. Leading is not for everyone.

Comments are closed.