Hits: 0
WPCNR Tomorrow’s News Today. News & Comment By John F. Bailey December 27, 2007: There are a lot of issues facing the City of
1. REMOVE TCEs from City Dump and Build Fields There: How long does it take the DEC and the city to evaluate how dirty the dump is? Testing has been going on for five months. If the DEC rules
Based on WPCNR investigation the TCEs can be neutralized by other chemicals, and could have been expunged by now. Why haven’t they?
2. Develop Police Emergency Notification System: The White Plains Department of Public Safety agrees with the CitizeNetReporter that the Department needs a means of communicating with citizens during a citywide or even a minor city emergency. Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety Dr. Charles Jennings proposed such a system to be developed 2009-2010. Such a system might constitute any number of procedures: a tape loop system updated that citizens could call for information; an AM radio system such as the Air Traffic Information System used at all airports. Still, no movement on this very urgent need. The police have no way of notifying all the citizens quickly about situations breaking in the city. WPCNR thinks it is about time!
3. Develop
4. Develop
5. Bring Budget in Line with City Revenues. Instead of budget cutting, city hall has pursued spending policies in recent years that have required, and continue to require revenue generating by selling city land, while funding affordable housing projects with city assets. The city now faces negotiating union contracts which they will settle at a minimum of 4% — maybe even 5% — now that they have a ¼% sales tax increase in the works. The city needs to look at their spending policies – task force the budget – instead of lurching forward with what appears to be a lack of planning and setting a policy of pay increases sharply above the rate of inflation. This is politically advantageous, but it kills the taxpayer.
6.Televise Work Sessions, Planning Board, Zoning Board Meetings. Major policy decisions are made at these meetings, and, in the case of the Common Council Work Sessions, and Special Meetings seemingly scheduled suspiciously close to holidays and at inopportune times to satisfy developer priorties. Important city issues are decided on in a small packed conference room with limited audience. The city should televise these sessions and Planning and Zoning Board meetings to better inform the public. Lack of equipment is no excuse. They could also be easily televised over the internet via the city website. If WPCNR can do it with White Plains Week, the city with a department devoted to internet services and computers, could certainly do it.
7. Enact Surcharge to Arrest Assessment Decline. It is no secret that declining commercial assessments are killing Mr. and Mrs. and Ms. White Plains. This year the owner of a $700,000 house in
Once again our Common Council has shown they are not leaders. They should reach out on their own to enlist the aid of concerns within the Central Downtown area to make available vacant buildings to provide beds for them all. Sites that come to mind are: the
9. Liaison with the Department of Transportation on the Tappan Zee/I-287 Corridor: This is long overdue. You cannot make plans for developing the railroad station area – as the council seems to be inclined to explore – without working with the state. If
10. Illegal Housing Crackdown: The next time one of the multi-family homes with 50 persons in it burns – the city may not be so lucky. When
The owners of those homes will be indicted for negligent manslaughter, and the city will be sued. The U.S. District Attorney and the State Attorney General will see another great investigation, and
It is time to publish every housing violation; publish the names of the owners; and start eminent domain proceedings to relieve owners of those Uriah Heap rooming house cash streams – after the second violation. And could we inspect once a month please? The only reason illegal housing exists is because it is in the best interest of the city or the powerful to let it continue.
We have also heard that organizations pretending to help immigrants steer them to housing that is illegal. How sordid and despicable is that? If WPCNR can confirm this—this would be a horrible thing. I hope it is not true.
Illegal housing isn’t O.K. because important people own it. It’s slum perpetuation.
When they carry the dead babies out of the next char job, the questions will come hard, fast, and relentless, then will come the indictments, the investigations, and the revelation of who owns these scurrilous establishments.
The city, the Common Council, the authorities have to make a choice here and the time to make it is now. Stamp it out. Either by buying them all out quietly.
11. School Budget Reform : This is another very sensitive issue.
12. Parking Reform: If you live in
A longer time limit is needed at the parking meters – perhaps raising the rates a little, but the time limits are what are so bad. You can rarely get everything done within an hour. Two hours is reasonable. One hour is not. I also do not like the double billing at the console parking lots, where the city is earning money when there is still time left on a parking space. That needs adjusting. I would also like free parking after 5 PM. That would be much more reasonable.
I also suggested graduated parking tickets. Your first parking ticket would be $10, second, $15, third $20, fourth, $25 and so on. This coordinated with expanded meter time intervals with increased rates for those longer meter intervals might be a direction to go.
These are wild suggestions, but a city that is unpleasant to shop in is not a city that is going to become a magnet destination. Though the Department of Parking is the city’s most profitable department, raking in $20 Million and spending only $10 Million in expenses, this does not mean it should keep increasing its profit margins just because it can.
13. Policy Making, Is there any?: The Common Council has to work just a little in-between Work Sessions and Special Meetings and the monthly Common Council meetings. They have to go out and mingle with the city. Go into places like Winbrook,
The council people have to start the year holding an open meeting or two to discuss things with the city administration and ferret out where the administration is taking the city. The council does not do that now, and have never done it in the eight years this website has been reporting the news in town. I have seen the council spring surprises on the Mayor, but never asked the Mayor – well, Mr. Mayor? What do you have in mind for the
The council appears likely to give us two years of inaction, so no one eyeing Mr. Delfino’s job, irritates any anti-development people, nor any pro-development people, nor any pro-open space, pro-school factions.
However, that is not leadership. Because whoever beats Mr.Delfino in 2009 (I see no one beating him unless Adam Bradley runs or a Council candidate rapidly takes on some leadership qualities, and Bill Ryan has self-destructed) – cannot jump into the job and do nothing.
We will know then just how successful development really is – and the sales tax has to be topping ohhhhh — $60 Million by 2009-2010– it’s now at $44.8 Million, otherwise there are going to be serious problems in wages – and property taxes. If the sales tax tops $60 Million, Delfino will take credit. If it is lagging, he can blame council inaction on finishing the development job.
The council has to demand projections of finances. They have to examine those capital project numbers seriously.
Development? Well – the council and the Mayor and the community have to agree. There are three areas of town left to fix: The station area, Lexington Avenue, and East Post Road – and you cannot do the latter to without removing the Coachman and 186 East Post Road—the homeless shelter sites – as well as the Department of Social Services areas – those are roadblocks to renaissancing the Lex-Post Road corridors.
The council needs to develop a policy formulation stance to consider how they will develop those three areas instead of using the Mayor’s shotgun approach. If they don’t the city will have two years of stagnation. The Mayoral-wanna-be’s will be trying to be all things to all voters instead of leaders. I think that is exactly what they will be “wanna-be’s”.
It’s no good saying we want “balanced development” without defining balanced
It does not work saying, you want “smart growth” without defining what is smart.
I say smart growth is “growing within your financial means and attracting development the city needs”
I say “balanced development” is “developing a mix of housing and commercial that pays its own way without bleeding the present tax payer.” So far I have not seen that. Administration policies have bled the taxpayer seriously due to certriorari policies and developer incentives.
The council at long last should find out what combination will achieve those two definitions. They can’t just listen and come down on the side of an issue that is best for their own political futures which is what they do all the time. We saw this in the past election.
Are there any leaders out there? Will we see them in 2008?
I am waiting.





































































