Everything’s Coming Up Karen In WBT’s Knockout Revival of Gypsy. Ethel Who?

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR IN THE WINGS. Review by John F. Bailey. June 9, 2007:  Mama Mia’s Karen Mason delivered a Broadway diva’s performance as Mama Rose, the domineering, controlling mother of the icon of ecdysiasts, Gypsy Rose Lee at Westchester Broadway Theatre Friday evening. Here is a musical about show business that moves with drive, and a talented lead in Ms. Mason who is a wow,




Karen Mason Brings the Audience to their feet with Rose’s Turn in Act II of GYPSY at the Westchester Broadway Theatre


All Photos by John Vecchiola, Courtesy, Westchester Broadway Theatre




Kellie Barrett as Louise (the ingenue)  transforming into Gypsy Rose Lee in her city to city burlesque tour in Act II. Ms. Barrett captures the innocence and style that made Ms. Lee the Queen of Burlesque.



Ms. Mason fills the stage with a big, brassy edge and powerhouse cords that command  with sweep, conviction and unmistakable Mermanesque moxie. But it is Ms. Mason’s stage. She’s all there in her blockbuster tune, Everything’s Coming Up Roses, and her bring-down-the-house finale, Rose’s Turn.  She contraltos the love songs, Small World, (dueting with her foil Rick Hilsabeck  as Herbie) and You’ll Never Get Away From Me with articulate intimacy and confidence that makes those songs new.  


The full house Friday night was treated to the vaudeville life from Seattle to L.A. to Detroit to Wichita in the Depression as a showbiz struck mom pushes her daughters to elusive stardom. We lurch from railroad station to railroad station to seedy theatrical hotels, to brick walled stages of the majestic theatrical palaces  of the distant vaudeville past.


Gypsy, the David Merrick/Leland Hayward mega musical of the early 60s, based on Gypsy Rose Lee’s memoir, has a gimmick and the gimmick is Ms. Mason who is rarely off the stage and delivers the role as Merman probably played it.


 



Jonathan Stahl as Uncle Jocko, with Alex Bradsell as Young Louise,(foreground, left) and Sophia Lebowitz (foreground, right)  as Baby June in the first of three vaudeville numbers in Act One.


She is the domineering director of an ensemble who reworks the same vaudeville kid act three times in Act One (a spinoff of such child acts as the Foys and Cohans of the vaudeville era). Under Mama Rose’s direction the act is reworked twice in Act One much to the audience’s amusement – from a newsboy act featuring her two daughters Baby June and Baby Louise, to a patriotic act, to a farm act, using the same steps, to a toreadore number in Act Two when her daughter and her almost grown young people are playing the southwest.



Celebrating a Booking at Mr. Gladstone’s Theatre.  Karen Mason is Rose, in blue,  giving Mr. Gladstone (Johnathan Stahl) a cigar, with Sarah Peak  as Dainty June, doing the split.


 At first light, Mama Rose’s daughters have just flopped at an audition for Uncle Jocko’s Vaudeville show (a very funny sequence), and on the way out, they meet up with a candy salesman, Herbie, (the Jack Klugman role in the original Broadway production) played valiantly by Rick Hilsabeck, whose love for Mama Rose is consistently thwarted by her devotion to her daughters.


How brassy is Ms. Mason? When a producer’s secretary is on the telephone, she yells, “Don’t answer the telephone when I’m shouting at you.”


The Show reaches crisis at the close of act one when  June, the sister with “talent” played with spunk,  sass and winning coquettishness by Kayla Vanderbilt (in Friday’s performance)  in the early newsboy act, to her sympathy-winning sister Baby Louise, created with genius “underplaying” by the  young actress Rebecca Simpson-Wallack,  where both ingenues sing Let Me Entertain You. Then by the older June, Sarah Peak, who is able to pull the transition from the child actress very believably and makes the same act just as entertaining in different costumes. The cow act is hysterical, even though it’s the same choreography in different costumes. We loved the dancing cow.


When June leaves to elope with one of the dancers in the act, Tulsa ( who has become a young man, wanting to break out on his own, Ms. Mason delivers one of the few missteps in an otherwise understandable performance. She snarls, snears with a very mean face saying of her younger daughter, “She’s nothing without me.” 


This is unsettling and delivered with over the top ugly meanness, it’s shocking. This is a big time Direction mistake. She has to deliver that line with a sob – so the audience can continue feeling sympathy for the character – to feel the pain of a mother’s love – not hate. They have to fix that. But that’s a direction problem and a book problem. Still, it is a jarring moment in the show you never quite get out of your mind.  That one moment makes the powerhouse ending of this production not quite believable. Just a sob, Ms. Mason, will do it.


 Mama Rose decides she is going to make a star out her other daughter, Louise, played by Kelli Barrett, who mostly stands on the stage as a follower in the shadow of sister, and watches in Act One, and as the musical progresses, her underplay is a little too underplayed. She plays Louise as a spectator to her sister June’s stardom, without resentment. A very mousy girl.


She lets Tulsa whom she has a crush on run away with her sister June. She begins to get going with the role here by showing emotion. She is not quite believable as having the spirit to become the Gypsy Rose Lee we see, slithering and shimmering about the stage at the close of the show. A little surliness and pouting, tears and resignation please! She shows this in a touching soft and believable performance of Little Lamb on her birthday.


Jordan Nichols as Tulsa has a neat star turn singing All I Need is the Girl to Louise at the end of Act One, that is received very nicely. Ms. Barrett’s Louise, observing Tulsa, shows such a crush, you’re thinking that hey, maybe. But that is not to be.  This is where Ms. Barrett begins to turn her character around.


Gypsy delivers not one, but three up-out-of-your-seat performances in the Second Act.


 




Kellie Barrett as Louise, Rick Hilsabeck as Herbie, and Karen Mason as Rose, trooping through Together in Act II on their last stop in Wichita, Kansas. Lobby still.


Act II  opens at the Wichita Seven Wonders show in Wichita, Kansas. Herbie, the agent whom Mama Rose refuses to marry, but who keeps beating the hick towns for bookings for the aging act has booked the aging troop into a Wichita burlesque house. The act, with June having eloped, is now Louise and the Hollywood Blondes as the “Toreadorables.” However, the act does not work out because – well, you’ll see as Ms. Barretts’ Louise –comes alive with a dogged attempt to fill in for June. The second act delivers some good humor here.



Kathryn Kendall as Miss Cratchett, left. The showstopper, Inga Ballard as Mazeppa, and Ngaire Martin as Tessie Tura show off their gimmicks. A hilarious tour de force that the audience loves. Publicity Lobby Photo


Then, Mama Rose and Louise and the rest of the troop learn about the life of burlesque in one of the funny, but not-for-the-children audience as the three burlesque stars deliver a raunchy, flaunt and bump your body number, You Gotta Have a Gimmick, in which each stripper shows off her “gimmick.”  Inga Ballard as Mazeppa, fractures the audience with her trumpet as her gimmick. (How do you strip with a trumpet, you’ll have to see).  Kathryn Kendall as Miss Cratchett literally lights up the house, and Ann-Ngaire Martin as Tessie Tura, works ballet into her gimmick. This is not a number for the young ones. But there is no nudity. Stripper costumes, yes.


As luck would have it, it’s the last day of their booking and the troop is about to break up and the main stripper has not shown up. The manager of the theatre needs someone to go on. Mama Rose says Louise can do it.  Here Barrett as Louise  pulls it off. Once again she sacrifices. She was going to go back to school, and Mama Rose was going to finally marry Herbie. Instead, her Mother gets one more last idea for her.


 To fill a contract, Louise urged by her mother, makes her first appearance as a stripper, emerging from ugly duckling into Ms. Elegance in a blue evening gown. (What have we here?) In her first strip, she tentatively removes a glove and shows a shoulder, and tries to sing Let Me Entertain You. It is painful  to watch and Ms. Barrett really nails the audience with her feigned stage fright and tentativeness. We get in her corner. 


 With a little imagination, the director, Richard Stafford could have had planted cat calls from the audience turning to appreciation, so we, the audience would have an idea of the appeal of this first strip that resulted in more bookings. I mean there would have been catcalls at a burlesque house. But, apparently her shy act scores. This first strip is painful to watch. It takes talent for an actress to strip badly on purpose, and Ms. Barrett established an emotional connection with the audience for the first time as we feel the hesitancy of her  first performance.  


 


Ms. Barrett on her next stops polishes up her act, making us want to see more and more. But she never does show more and more. That was Ms. Lee’s appeal, too.



 The new Gypsy, with Ms. Barrett finessing and vamping up her style, dances in sequential numbers in Detroit, Philadelphia and New York then Paris. Here Ms. Barrett shows off the long, long, long,long boa.


We watch Ms. Barrett polish her act as the international queen of burlesque, Gypsy. She gains confidence and glamour with each number, essentially the same but smashingly entertaining. Her “strips” are teases – strip sequences make full spectacular use of WBT’s elevating platform.  Ms. Barrett has the legs and fills an evening gown deliciously and elegantly. Her provocative presence and sophistication steam up with each successive striptease sequence. 


She showed excellent trouper’s poise, though having trouble with one costume change and gamely managing through it, (holding up her green gown almost having an equipment malfunction). Ms. Barrett shows progressively more confidence in each strip on the tour.


The show finishes with Mama Rose having a hard time handling Louise, now a star, and her success.


Ms. Barrett and her mother throw a great argument with Ms. Barrett’s Gypsy holding her own against her Mom (and showing signs of her mother’s iron will –supposedly developed on tour) in Gypsy’s dressing room in Paris.


The results set up the over-the-top finish when Ms. Mason belts out Rose’s Turn that brings the audience to their feet. She is terrifically entertaining and watching her, any young lady would want to have this kind of talent, or want to develop it.


 We’ll let you decide if Gypsy’s end retrieves the overtones of smothering parenting.


 



WBT Turned Into a Vaudeville Palace by George Puello’s set. Photo by WPCNR.


 


George Puello and Steven Loftus have created impressive moving sets, including use of painted cityscape backdrops of the depression 30s, train stations, and the illusion of giant vaudeville houses. Lighting by Andrew Gmoser compliments, dazzles, enchants in what is Puello’s best staging we’ve seen in years at the WBT.  George’s stagings are always good, but tonight’s show makes more of WBT’s hydraulic lifts and light gimmicks than any this reporter has seen. Mr. Puello seemed born again in his creative use of the WBT stage.


This is not a show for young children, though a talented troup of youngsters play splendidly in the first act. Gypsy is a history lesson that’s a real smash for 90% of the evening, and received a 3-minute standing ovation.


Westchester Broadway Theatre takes you back to the golden age of Broadway with these shows that are about 50 to 60 years old. Gypsy recalls a bygone era of great songs and dance and staging when pyrotechnics, electronics and production gimmicks were at a minimum and talent, a great feel good story came together and worked the emotions.

 Gypsy is playing Tuesday through Sundays at the WBT through August 4. Learn more by going to their website, www.broadwaytheatre.com

Posted in Uncategorized

Renegade Council Candidates Issue Statement on the Cappelli Withdrawal

Hits: 0

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2007. June 6, 2007: Council candidates Robert Levine, Robert Stackpole and Marc Pollitzer have issued a statement to WPCNR on the results of the Louis Cappelli decision to withdraw his Station Square bid for exclusive development rights to the White Plains Train Station area Monday evening.


The three renegade candidates  call the exercise a waste of time and issue a call for a new comprehensive plan for the city to be created using an independent planning consultant. The statement mocks the Council for comments councilmembers made lamenting specific guidelines for the station area, when the Council approved just such guidelines when they approved Review of the 1997 Comprehensive Plan.



Robert Levine, (Center), Marc Pollitzer (right) and Robert Stackpole (left) are expected to begin circulating petitions to place the three of them on the November ballot as independents. They will begin signature collection July 10. Photo, Courtesy, the Levine, Pollitzer, Stackpole Team.


Their statement:



    The essence of sound planning lies in listening to what people have to
say, sorting it out and doing the hard work necessary to define the
problem(s) with care in order to come up with future options for
evaluation. The process requires the involvement of detached objective
professional planning consultants and should be characterized by
objectivity, competent analysis and widespread citizen participation in
the interest of maintaining and improving our quality of life.



    Monday night’s Council Train Station deliberations should be labeled
for what they were… a regrettable waste of time and energy. Mr.
Cappelli explained how he came to plan the use and square foot area of
his proposed project as dependent on what it would take for the market
to bear the “no cost” replacement of the station, parking garage, and a
fire house.  It would be laughable if it weren’t so sad.



    Our elected officials have their priorities so skewed that they ignore
basic planning principles and fail to exercise their responsibility for
having them carried out. At the end of the evening, several Council
members implied their frustration with the inadequacy of current
planning guidelines they recently approved.  We have to wonder, ”Don’t
they get it?”



    We’ve been diddling while the city is being taken from us. We need a
proper new Comprehensive Plan to help us get it back now!


Robert Levine


Marc Pollitzer


Robert Stackpole



Posted in Uncategorized

Engineering Firm Conducting Structural Integrity Survey of Galleria Garages

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR THE PARKING NEWS. By John F. Bailey. June 6, 2007: The city of White Plains is undertaking a comprehensive thorough engineering inspection of the 27 year old Galleria garages, opened in 1980.


The survey came to light as a result of a minor structural failure, reported by the Department of Parking at the Galleria garage Monday. A flooding at a juncture, as described by a person who witnessed the cascade, was caused, according to Commissioner of Parking Albert Maloni was described as being the result of a precast double T intersection.


The Commissioner  said, “ What happened yesterday was the result of a precast double-T intersection located at the corner of a very heavily trafficked intersection, so to speak, where water intrusion problems over the years caused a minor structural failure. It could have been a big problem. We had a double-T fail like this in 1996, and it was repaired as this one will be in the exact same fashion, and it’s as good as new.”


WPCNR asked if this meant the garage was wearing out and needing replacing,or whether this was just routine problems.


“Absolutely not,” Moroni said.


The Commissioner revealed though that the city is taking no chances. Contrary to what was reported in the paper press, that Charles Sells Engineering was repairing the Double T break, it turns out the Charles Sells firm is undertaking a much larger job.


Moroni explained: “I’m not saying that there aren’t problems located throughout the garage. That’s why we’ve hired Charles Sells engineering firm They’re doing a comprehensive evaluation of both garages, the ramps, the staircases, the supporting beams. Everything there is to look at is being looked at, and we are going to take a look and see what we need to do. I would not want anybody to think that garage is not safe.”


WPCNR asked if the Galleria Garage would have to be reconstructed sometime soon.

Maroni said, “No. Not reconstructed. There are going to be repairs that are needed. Once we get the engineering firm comprehensive report, we’re going to chip away at those major issues (they uncover). Come July 1, we have in the capital program, $1.5 Million for relamping and relighting the entire garage and repainting the entire garage. We’re putting half a million dollars in multi-space meters into it, and we’ll put whatever money we need structurally. The bonds on that garage are paid off. It’s a major asset in the city economy.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Pending Dump Settlement with DEC Does Not Preclude Cleanup

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE DUMP NEWS. By John F. Bailey. June 6, 2007: Wendy Rosenbach, spokesperson for the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation told WPCNR Tuesday that the city and the DEC have not signed the final consent order, resolving the city’s 32-year dispute with the DEC on contamination in the City Dump. The Common Council authorized the Mayor to sign a settlement, paying the first $2,000 of a total fine to be disclosed at a future date. City “backup material documents” did not disclose the total fine.


Ms. Rosenbach told WPCNR that because the agreement on the fine had not been finalized yet, she could not comment on what the total amount was. She did say that the city still could be subject to cleaning up the site, as the fine “does not preclude any cleanup that would be required.” The site has been contaminated with TCE (Tri-chloral Ethylene), for 32 years.


Last spring, an independent DEC test found portions of the site to include contamination of 80 PPB over the 5 PPB permitted under DEC standards. In dispute now, WPCNR has been told is the extent of the TCE coverage.


Rosenbach said that the city might be allowed to cap the contamination rather than remediate it, but said no resolution after one year has been determined yet.


Paul Wood, Executive Officer, is in the process of seeking an update for WPCNR from Commissioner of Public Works Joseph Nicoletti as to the exact progress in determining the need of a clean-up or a capping and what the issues are.

Posted in Uncategorized

Resolution Relieves Cappelli of Opening Affordable Housing Before Ritz Opens

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. June 6, 2007: David Maloney, press spokesperson for the Mayor’s Office confirmed today exclusively to WPCNR that the opening of the Ritz-Carlton hotel scheduled for next fall is no longer tied to completed construction of the 24 affordable housing obligations attached to the previous city approval of the Ritz project.



Paul Wood, City Executive Officer,  Explains. In a statement, Paul Wood explained the approved delay in building and opening the affordable housing units until after the Ritz opened.


Maloney confirmed to WPCNR with the single word, “Yes” that  passage of Resolution Item 119 effectively paved the way for the Ritz to open without the affordable housing units being built that are required by that project. A resolution passed late Monday evening granted a one year extension of a site plan for  Cappelli Enterprises subsidiaries to build an 8-story, 42 unit “affordable housing” apartments at 240 Main Street which would satisfy Cappelli responsibility to build 24 units of affordable housing “in connection with the 221 Main (Ritz-Carlton project), and the 17 units Cappelli Enterprises still owes on the City Center project.


Paul Wood, City Executive Officer, explains the sequence of events in this manner: “The 240 Main Street extension request granted this week was necessitated by the Council support of the Pinnacle project.  In effect, the Council agreed to a tolling period in fairness to Cappelli of 9 months while he was forced to stand by while the Pinnacle project continued to try to put their project together.  Competition was not so good in this case because the Pinnacle failed to materialize and the eight story building proposed by Cappelli would have been built and occupied by now had he not been forced to wait.”


Asked why Cappelli Enterprises had not been asked for a bond in the amount of the estimate cost of constructing the entire building, (far more than $1.2 Million), Wood said that was all The Pinnacle had been asked for. However, WPCNR does not recall the amount of the bond The Pinnacle was asked for ever being made public.


A $1.2Million Guarantee


The resolution recognizes that Cappelli Enterprises has posted a $1.2 Million bond the city can “draw on…if LC White Plains LLC does not complete the Affordable Housing Requirement and obtain temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy for such 17 affordable units by August 31, 2008…”


Previously, members of the Common Council had stipulated as a condition of opening that the Ritz-Carlton could not receive Certificates of Occupancy until the affordables owed for that project were opened. This connection with affordable housing was, in effect, muddied when the Common Council was persuaded to allow Cappelli Enterprises to strike a deal with Ginsburg Development Corporation to build the affordable housing units for Cappelli Enterprises on the Ginsburg Pinnacle site on 240 Main Street. Ginsburg, previously expected to build the Pinnacle development, now described  in the resolution passed as having “not fulfilled its obligations and the responsibility reverts back to LC Main, LLC and LC White Plains, LLC” (Cappelli Enterprise operations). 


The resolution quietly passed Monday evening clears the way for a glitch-free opening of the Ritz-plex this fall without any affordable housing units opened.

Posted in Uncategorized

63 Years Ago: Normandy Invasion Signaled Beginning of the End of WWII

Hits: 0

WPCNR FOR THE RECORD. June 6, 2007: In the predawn hours of June 6, 1944, the greatest naval, infantry and airborne operation in military history ever assembled approached the coast of Normandy in northern France in the chop of the English Channel approaching highly fortified beaches of northern France. At the end of the day, June 6, 63 years ago allied forces at horrible cost with amazing heroism had secured footholds and had begun the campaign to remove the German Third Reich, beginning the end of World War II. To recall this sobering day, WPCNR refers you to http://www.kansasheritage.org/abilene/ikedday.html which details the scale of this never-to-be-forgotten invasion.

Posted in Uncategorized

County Board Action on Monday

Hits: 0

WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. From County Board of Legislators. June 5, 2007:


 


Legislation Passed


 


Additional Enforcement Power to County’s Human Rights Commission


Expanded penalties include allowing: the imposition of punitive damages up to $10,000 in “willful, wanton or malicious” discrimination cases; the Commission’s Executive Director to impose civil penalties in cases the Director initiates; the assessment of civil penalties between $50,000 and $100,000, payable to the county, for serious cases of housing discrimination; a successful complainant to recover costs of pursuing a discrimination complaint.


 


Plumbing and Electrical Licensing Boards


Clarified: that the county’s Plumbing and Electrical Licensing Boards can continue to assess monetary fines against individuals or entities that violate the county’s licensing laws but the licensing boards have no authority regarding criminal matters other than to refer them to the district attorney’s office.


The legislation also gave the Board of Plumbing Examiners the authority to grant reciprocal licenses to plumbers licensed outside of Westchester. Current law already gives the Electrical Licensing Board the authority to grant reciprocal licenses.


 


Health and Dental Care for Westchester, Putnam and Rockland Residents with HIV/AIDS


Using a federal grant of $273,940, the County Board authorized that the county contract with Westchester Medical Center to provide primary and oral health care services for Westchester, Putnam and Rockland residents with HIV/AIDS for the period from March 1, 2007 through Feb. 29, 2008.


 


Yorktown Community Center Lease


County Board approved 5-year lease (no cost to county) for space in the Yorktown Community Center to be used as a satellite office for Department of Senior Programs and Services. 


 


Amendment to the County Pay Plan


The County Board approved an amendment to the County Pay Plan proposed by the County Executive that deleted and added certain titles and changed compensation for several positions. The total cost of the amendment is $105,471, funds already included in departments’ 2007 budget. 


 


Mortgage Tax Receipts


County Board approved the semi-annual distribution to cities, towns and villages of mortgage taxes that amounted to over $35 million for the period from October 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007.


 


Bond Acts Approved



  • $3.1 million to upgrade the central heating plant at the Valhalla campus (Public Works)

  • $500,000 to replace obsolete computer equipment (Dept of Information Technology)

  • $1.2 million to upgrade desktop and laptop computers  (Dept of Information Technology)

Resolutions Passed


 


Indian Point License Renewal (16-0)


Entergy Corporation’s license to operate Indian Point 2 and 3 expire in 2013 and 2015, respectively. Entergy Corporation has asked the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission to renew its license to operate the plants for another twenty years. The County Board’s resolution supports federal legislation (HR 2162-Nuclear Power Licensing Act of 2007) that would mandate that the criteria for a license renewal be the same as that required for a new plant.


 


Board of Legislators Staffing (16-0)


The resolution passed affirmed that as a legislative body, all BOL staff fall within the unclassified service category of the NYS Civil Service Law; deleted some staff titles; added titles that reflected current positions; adjusted salary levels for some titles; and, directed that the relevant county departments immediately effectuate the changes called for in the resolution.


 


Appointments approved to Westchester County Advisory Boards:


 


Women’s Advisory Board


×                       Judith Schwartz (White Plains) reappointed


 


Refuse Disposal District #1 Advisory Board


×                       Peter Ligouri (Greenburgh) reappointed as a town representative


×                       Rocco Circosta (Ossining) reappointed


×                       James W. Finch, Jr. (Mount Vernon) reappointed


 


Human Rights Commission


×                       Paul Ryan (Buchanan) reappointed


 


Fire Advisory Board


×                       David P. Klaus (Yorktown) reappointed


 


Hispanic Advisory Board


×                       Robin A. Bikkal (White Plains), reappointed as a member and chair


×                       Fernando Serratto (Ossining)


 


Domestic Violence Council


×                       Patricia Brimais (Chestnut Ridge)


×                       James Hoffnagle (Hastings-on-Hudson), as a representative from the County Probation Department


 


Citizen’s Consumer Advisory Council


×                       Paul Ryan (Ardsley), as Retail Food Merchant Representative


 


African American Advisory Board


×                       Claudett J. Stothart (White Plains)


 


 


For additional background information on any of the above items, please contact Betsy DeSoye at (914) 995-3277.

Posted in Uncategorized

Should Common Council Meetings be Simulcast/Captioned in Spanish.

Hits: 0

WPCNR MR. & MRS. & Ms. White Plains Voice. June 5, 2007: It struck me last night observing “Common Council Theater” on Channel 75, reporters cannot afford to cover council meetings because of the automatic $15 ticket you get with extraordinarily lengthy hot air sessions in the Council Chambers, that over 40% of the city residents are Hispanic, 37% are White and 27% are black. Yet, a Hispanic resident not understanding English perfectly, would not be able, watching the council meeting to understand the proceedings. Heck, certain commissioners who speak English cannot be understood. Therefore it occurred to me to run a flash poll: Should Council meetings televised by captioned/ or better yet have a running Spanish translation of what is being said.


What do Mr. and Mrs. and Ms. White Plains think about that?

Posted in Uncategorized

Photograph of the Day — Longview Lot Closes

Hits: 0

WPCNR PHOTO OF THE DAY. By the WPCNR Roving Photographter. June 5, 2007: As indicated by rather obscure signage last week, the Longview Avenue and Maple Avenue municipal parking lot which serves the Dickstein Center and White Plains Hospital Center closed Monday, signaling the beginning of constructing a 5-story, 657-space parking facility to serve the Kensington Senior Assisted Living project and White Plains Hospital Center, about to begin construction on Maple Avenue and Cromwell Place.


Commissioner of Parking Albert Moroni said, “Our plan from the start was for those folks who have permits to park in the Chester Maple garage. We reconfigured some of the spots in Chester Maple and took away some of the meter spaces and created more permit spots. The only other options for daily commuter types is The Galleria-Lexington West Garage. (4 long blocks away), On any given day, there are 800 spaces available.”



Longview Maple Municipal Lot yesterday.


Photo by the WPCNR Roving Photographer.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Citizen Exposes 45% Increase in White Plains Train Station Commuter Parking Fee.

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. June 5, 2007: At the Citizens to Be Heard portion of the Common Council meeting Monday evening, a citizen, Yonah Wolf got up and protested the newest rise in White Plains parking fees: the massive 45% increase in the annual Commuter Parking Permit from $569 to $825. Wolf said the increase was almost double what he paid two years ago (2004-2005, the year of the last increase), when he paid $450 for the same daily parking privilege. He protested this was a “tax” on those who commute to New York City every day, which he estimated at 8,000 persons.


Wolf expressed the opinion that the Council deliberately hid this increase by considering the fees at a Special Meeting just before the Memorial Day Weekend, which he described as “short notice.” Wolf also drew a dollars and sense picture for the Councilpersons, saying “the multi-hour meter rates are increasing by a similar margin.”  Wolf points out the fees were set in budget hearings, but voted on prior to Memorial Day weekend getaway Friday. His remarks:


 Good Evening Mayor Delfino, and Honorable Members of the City Council. My Name is Yonah Wolf, and I have lived in White Plains for just over 6 years. While I have been privileged to meet some of you at various events around town, this is the first time I am attending a Council Meeting. I am here tonight to express my disappointment with your recent decision to increase parking rates at our city’s meters and garages. While I understand that rates increase over time, I feel that this rate increase is grossly unfair in both the percentage of the increase as well as in the manner it was considered by the common council.

 With the new increase – the second increase since 2004, the cost of my Annual Daytime Parking Permit at the Transcenter will go up to $825, a 45% increase over last year’s cost of $569, and almost double the $450 I paid for  the 2003-04. In addition, the multi-hour meter rates are increasing by a similar margin. This is a tremendous burden for many of us who park in any of the city’s municipal lots – even more so to the many individuals who have two permits – one for parking near their home overnight, and one for parking near the train or their offices during the day. As of July 1st, someone with two-permits will now be paying for the equivalent of 3 spots for one car!

What this increase amounts to is a new tax on one of the fastest-growing segments of White Plains Residents – those of us who commute to NYC. While Metro-North would not provide specific figures, other sources and articles have put White Plains as the busiest station outside of Grand Central, and it is estimated that more than 8000 or so individuals travel from White Plains into NYC every day – a growing number fast approaching 15% of our population.

This convenience to New York City is one of two reasons that I chose to move here – the other being the socioeconomic and ethnic diversity of our residents. While the former remains true, the latter seems to be slowly slipping away, and if this trend continues, individuals of more modest means, such as myself, will be forced to leave and White Plains will ultimately turn into a haven for the wealthy.

 But commuters are only part of the picture. In addition, I feel that this decision will also have a negative effect on our city’s businesses as well.  As of July 1st, it will cost a full 50% more to park in our garages on an hourly basis and 100% more per hour to park at street meters. This rate will definitely have an impact on shoppers’ when they choose to shop here vs. in other locations in Westchester. Anecdotally, I know of many neighbors who don’t shop in White Plains anymore because every shopping center has a parking cost. As more people follow this trend,  our city’s coffers will be doubly-effected, both by lowered parking revenue as well as lower sales tax collections – not to mention the financial impact on our local businesses.

But I digress, the reason I am speaking here tonight, is because you chose to discuss this at a special council meeting with very little advance notice. As a taxpayer, I don’t think that I am off base in suggesting that a topic as sensitive as this should not be relegated to a last minute special meeting held on the eve a holiday weekend as this limits debate on the matter.

In conclusion, I realize that all that I have said to you tonight is moot, as the rate increases have already been approved, and it is unlikely that you will change your decision. However, I still feel the need to express my disappointment at your decision on the public record, as well as the manner in which it was made. I appreciate the opportunity to address you this evening, and I would greatly appreciate any comments that you have regarding my statement or your decision on the Parking increase.

Thank you.





 

Posted in Uncategorized