Hits: 0
WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT. By John F. Bailey. April 3, 2009 UPDATED 5:50 P.M.E.D.T.: City Executive Officer Paul Wood, through spokesperson Susan Garofalo confirmed to WPCNR the city is beginning the process of binding arbitration with the police and fire unions to resolve the matter of the agreed-on wage settlements rejected by the Common Council December 17, by 5-2. At the time Wood told WPCNR,
“We’re disapointed that what we considered a good contract for the City was rejected. I’ll have to speak to the union and see if we go back to the negotiating table or to mediation. “
Wood, through the spokesperson today, (Ms. Garofalo), said the city had been in arbitration with the unions ever since the council rejected the 3.75%, 4% and 4% three year contracts with the two unions. Ms. Garofalo, asked if the council knew the city had gone ahead to the binding arbitration procedure, said that Mr. Wood said the council did know of the decision to go to binding arbitration.
One member of the Common Council, Rita Malmud told WPCNR, she was unaware the wage disagreement was going to arbitration, until WPCNR called her today. Glen Hockley, the councilperson, told WPCNR when asked if he knew about the decision, said “I believe so.” Asked how he knew, Hockley said, “I heard it on the street. I haven’t gotten anything in writing about it.”
Joseph Carrier, President of the White Plains Fire Fighters Local 274, speaking to WPCNR said the firefighters’ union had agreed with the city to enter into “interest binding arbitration, and we are still in the process of picking a panel. Carrier said a panel of three persons, one representing the union, another the city, and a third, the arbitrator will hear presentations by representative of the union.
Carrier said the police and the fire unions will participate in separate arbitration panels with the police union stating their case to a panel of police rep, city rep and an arbitrator, and the fire fighters union rep presenting to a panel of a firefighter representative, city representative and an arbitrator.
Ms. Garofalo told WPCNR that the city has “just selected” an independent aribtrator, (not from a state agency), but did not name the person. Carrier said the aribtrator for his fire fighter arbitration panel has not been presented to the union as of yet.
Carrier said the issues involve “wages and certain other items,” but stated “we’re willing…happy to settle for what we negotiated last fall with the Mayor, 3.75 and 4 (for the next two years) which is in line with comparables.”
Councilperson Rita Malmud contacted by WPCNR to see if the council had agreed privately to binding arbitration said WPCNR’s call “was the first time I’ve heard of it. I have no details. I don’t know anything about this. I’ve been given no information.”
Councilman Benjamin Boykin, President of the Common Council, was left a message, asking the same question. Boykin this week said he could not comment on budget adjustments until he had seen the city budget Monday. He told WPCNR he would be sharing budget concerns once he received the budget Monday evening.
Boykin said he would discuss council budget deliberations with candidates for Mayor from both parties as well as their ideas.
Melissa Lopez of the Mayor’s office said Mayor Joseph Delfino, now officially a lame duck Mayor, said he would seek ideas and input from those running to succeed him from either party.
The two year committment based on any arbitrator decision essentially would lock the city into rolling over the present budget ($161.7 Million) to pay for a 3.75% increase in 2009-10 and roll over again in 2010-11 to cover such settlements. The wage increases would also set a pattern for the teamsters and the CSEA unions as well assuring possible automatic increases of the budget in a time of revenue shortfalls amounting to an estimated $9 Million this year, as estimated by the City Financial Officer, Gina Cuneo-Harwood.