Hits: 0
WPCNR THE DEVELOPING NEWS. By John F. Bailey July 17, 2007: Under state law, developer Louis Cappelli’s Ritz Carlton project at 221 Main St. in White Plains may qualify for a tax break on top of the $110-million to come Mr. Cappelli’s way, WPCNR has learned.
Louis Cappelli, May, 2007
Back in October, 2003, then-Governor George Pataki signed into law the Brownfield Cleanup Program legislation which had been passed by both the New York State Assembly and New York State Senate. The program offers developers who clean up a polluted site and then build a project there up to 22% of the development’s total cost in the form of New York State tax credits.
However, a developer also may be entitled to a second category of tax credits. These would be annual state tax credits of up to 100% of the real estate taxes they pay to a municipality on the property. While the developer would make real estate tax payments to the taxing municipality (such as White Plains), New York State would reimburse the developer in the form of tax credits. The real estate tax credits are pegged to the number of jobs created at a formerly-polluted site. The maximum credit is $10,000 per employee multiplied by the number of employees.
Rewards
In the case of the Ritz-Carlton project, Cappelli has said in the past that the total cost of the Ritz complex was $550-million, and the state tax credits to which he is entitled have been widely reported as being $110-million. Any real estate property tax credits would be on top of the $110-million. The real estate property tax credit is $10,000 maximum per new job created, directly applicable to property taxes paid.
Cappelli Enterprises, in a statement issued last week, said that the $110-million tax credit figure is incorrect, and that the correct figure is $75-million. The statement also said that the cost to clean up the pollution at the 221 Main Street site was $50-million.
If Mr. Cappelli’s cost of cleanup is less than the $110 Million he is entitled too, he will receive a check from the state tax department for the balance, which according to last week’s statement from Cappelli Enterprises is $75 Million.
The Scenario
In connection with the Ritz-Carlton project, Cappelli retained Al Pirro’s firm, The Pirro Group, for assistance with Brownfield Cleanup Program matters. Pirro, as you know, is the husband of former Westchester District Attorney Jeanine Pirro. The Pirro Group has a number of developers as clients in connection with the Brownfield Cleanup Program. Their web site lists the clients and describes how the Brownfield Cleanup Program works at http://www.pirrogroup.com/bfr.cfm
Cappelli told WPCNR on Monday that “No monies have been paid on tax credits yet. You only receive credits when you complete the project and get a Certificate of Occupancy. The credits for us will be phased in over a three year period starting in 2008.”
Cappelli also noted that he expects the Ritz-Carlton to open October 10th.
Cappelli confirmed that he is receiving a Brownfield Cleanup Program tax credit for cleanup at his project in Ossining: “Ossining is in the program and the credits work the same way.”
Site Remediation
The Department of Environmental Conservation Press Office in Albany confirmed to WPCNR that the 221 Main Street Ritz-Carlton Development site was declared completely remediated of pollution seven months ago in December 2006, when Cappelli Enterprises was given a Certification of Completion, signed by DEC officials.
Yancey Roy of the state DEC press office said that Mr. Cappelli’s tax credits earned by the cleanup of the gasoline-polluted site would be paid by the state tax department after Mr. Cappelli applies for the credits.
City & Council Silent
City officials and city councilpersons who approved the 221 Main Project June 7, 2004, did not respond to WPCNR queries as to whether the council and the city knew the developer was going to apply for Brownfield Cleanup Program and its credits at the time the 221 Main Street project featuring the Ritz-Carlton was approved June 7, 2004. Mr. Cappelli, and a series of partner sattelites received approval for 221 Main when a Brownfield Cleanup Agreement was awarded six months later in December, 2004.
At the June 7 approval, three parcels of land were sold for Cappelli to use in building the 221 Main Street project, making it possible. They were a municipal parking lot, the land of the former White Plains police headquarters, and a parcel controlled by the Urban Renewal Agency.
Legislation approving the project put a value of $1,706,410 on the parcels. The $1,706,410 was to be paid by Cappelli as follows: “First, for the environmental clean up of all environmental contamination on the Agency parcels,…” and “Second, for the construction of the Court Street Extension from Main Street to Hamilton Avenue…” and, “Third, the payment of any amount of the Disposal Price not expended on (i) and (ii) (cost of clean up, and construction of Court Street) to the Agency.”
Municipalities Cannot Partner in the Tax Credits
WPCNR asked Louis Cappelli Monday if he had paid anything to the city for the 221 Main land, and whether he had advised the city he was applying for the brownfields program and the subsequent tax credits at the time of approval.
Cappelli issued this statement: “Tax credits can only go to a “partner” they cannot go to a municipality. Tax credits are only earned when you spend the development and construction money and get a Certificate of Occupancy for a building.”
Saves the Cost of Cleanup to the City
He pointed out the advantage of the cleanup to the city in the same statement:
“We took the entire environmental liability from the city when we got the property. This was a substantial liability that could only be satisfied if someone excavated the entire property 50 feet down to bedrock ON THE ENTIRE SITE. We even had to clean up the adjacent parcels on the Power Authority Building up to 50 feet down.”
Cappelli told WPCNR in a separate statement he would apply for the tax credits after he receives the Certificate of Occupancy for the Ritz-Carlton in 2008 for the 2007 tax year.
Albany Times-Union
The story that Cappelli and other key New York state developers would be eligible for the Brownfield Cleanup Program tax breaks appeared on June 10th in the Hearst newspaper, the Albany Times-Union, written by reporter Brian Nearing. Nearing told WPCNR a source had advised him to look into the state Brownfields Cleanup Program tax credits.
Nearing said he went over the applications for the program on file with New York State and developed the story showing the full extent of how much in tax credits developers were going to earn from cleanups of polluted sites. The story revealed publicly that developers would get back up to 22% of the total construction cost at their Brownfield Cleanup Program sites, not just cost of cleaning them up. Nearing’s report revealed the tax breaks far outstrip the cleanup costs.
Mr. Nearing’s story may be read at http://www.timesunion.com/ASPStories/storyprint.asp?StoryID=596668.
The Brownfield Cleanup Program was hailed in October, 2003 as a vehicle to develop many of the state’s contaminated sites by offering incentives to developers (i.e., tax credits) to take on the cleanup and resurrection of the sites.
Soil, Tanks, Dirty Water Removed.
A DEC Fact Sheet describing the 221 Main Street remediation agreement and the Certificate of Completion was faxed to WPCNR by the DEC press office. According to that document “remedial measures were taken at the site to remove all former sources
of contamination and related contaminated media (soil, groundwater) within the site boundary. This was accomplished by excavating and removing all buried underground storage tanks (USTs) from the site, which were the source of soil and groundwater contamination, and were also a potential source of soil vapor contamination.”
The fact sheet reports the remediation began and the spring of 2005 and was completed in the summer of 2006. It included remediation at the New York Power Authority garage where, according to the document, “some groundwater contamination existed.”
The DEC laundry list of the results:
9 underground storage tanks were removed.
Approximately 23,720 tons of contaminated soil were removed from the site.
Approximately 22,832 gallons of contaminated groundwater were removed from the site and the adjacent New York Power Authority Site.
Potential soil vapor contamination was remediated by removing these sources.
WPCNR asked a construction expert what the 23,370 tons of dirt represented in terms of truck loads. He said most truckers use standard 10-wheelers which based on a checking of dump truck specifications would carry 14 yards per trip. The source mentioned that a Triaxle rig would carry 20 yards per trip. The 23,370 tons of contaminated soil by rough estimate amount to 1,581 truck loads in a standard 10-Wheeler dump truck, and about 800 truck loads if the larger truck the Triaxle was used, based on a WPCNR examination of truck capacities at truck dealerships.
The 22,832 gallons of contaminated ground water are equivalent to roughly two thirds the capacity of a 40 x 20 x 6 foot swimming pool which contains 36,000 gallons of water.
All Clear
The Fact Sheet remarks “Previous site investigations verified that abandoned underground storage tanks (USTs) existed at the site, and there was evidence of soil and groundwater contamination as well. A Remedial Investigation completed under the BCP (Brownfield Contamination Program) indicated that soil was the principally impacted medium for this site, but appeared to be limited to the areas where the USTs were located. Contaminated soil was excavated as the USTs were removed during the IRM, and confirmatory end-point samples indicate that recommended soil cleanup objectives have been achieved for the site.
Governor: Tax Credits as Excessive.
In a news release June 5, Governor Eliot Spitzer called for reforming the Brownfields Cleanup Program so developers would not receive tax credits over the actual cost of cleanup. The release finds “An analysis of the first 25 projects certified and approved under the program (since 2003) indicates that only a small fraction of the tax credits granted were related to remediation costs.”
The news release quotes Governor Spitzer: “The current law contains no protections to ensure that the funds directed toward economic development are wisely used or bear any relationship to the number of jobs created, leaving the state with an open-ended liability while failing to achieve the law’s intent of cleaning up contaminated sites.”
The release reports that any revision of the Brownfields Cleanup Program would not apply to developers with Brownfield Cleanup Agreements (BCAs) already in place, to wit, “remediation plans approved by the Department of Environmental Conservation and actual remediation underway will be governed by the existing tax credit structure.”