Hits: 0
WPCNR THE HOUSING NEWS. By John F. Bailey. July 16, 2009: According to New York State Committee on Open Government Office, commenting on the WPHA refusal to disclose the developer-wanna-be’s of Winbrook there “doesn’t seem to be any harm in disclosure of the names of all entities.”
The White Plains Housing Authority declined a WPCNR request last week to disclose the identities of development companies (stated publicly as from anywhere to 12 to 30 firms) who have submitted their credentials for consideration by the WPHA to be the developer who will construct the half-billion to a billion dollar Winbrook Revitalization Zoning approved last week in record time by the Common Council.

Junked? Conceptual Plan a Concept Only. Real Winbrook Revitalization Could Be Completely Different (within zoning confines).

Hurry Up Pass it and Wait. Applications, not ready to go. Awaiting Developer
The Housing Authority also revealed to WPCNR last week that there are no applications for HUD money and other grants “bureaucrat-ready” to submit this month because the developer to be selected from the list of first-responders to the White Plains Housing Authortity Request for Qualifications is expected to execute all the applications, documents, and mounds to HUD and other grant agencies.
Asked if the developer names were submitted in connection with presentation of credentials and qualifications to develop only and no bids, if the WPHA should disclose all the developer identities, Camille Jobin-Davis, Esq., Assistant Director of the NYS Committee on Open Government, said “I would agree.”
In the case of requests for proposals, which have not been sent out by the WPHA, She commented that if the Housing Authority narrowed the field to a handful of developers for consideration and submission of bids, and in an effort to negotiate the best deal for the Housing Authority from among the three, caselaw agrees that the Housing Authority could withhold the elite three or four selections.
Mack Carter, Executive Director of the White Plains Housing Authority, explained the WPHA refusal to divulge the names of firms that have responded to the Request for Qualifications promulgated last spring, saying, “that’s not the way we do business.”
Carter, asked if applications to HUD for stimulus funding would be going out this month which had been publicly stated as being the impetus for swift Common Council approval of the Winbrook “Rezoning Package” paving the way for the Winbrook Revitalization, Carter said no applications or paperwork would be going out until after the developer has been selected. Carter said the designated developer would be making the application, drawing up the site plans, and working with the White Plains Housing Authority on the protocols and paperwork on the project.
Mr. Carter said the WPHA hoped to winnow from the list three developers, than select from one of those three, based on their proposals. However, the Request for Qualifications does not specifically ask for proposals for the site with the applications or bids of any kind. Carter said the three to be selected would be picked by the WPHA Board. The WPHA, Carter said would be solely responsible for selecting the developer. The Common Council would not have final approval of the developer but eventually would have input on whatever project is selected.
Carter said the preliminary concept designs shown Winbrook residents in two recent public meetings attended by less than 100 Winbrook residents (17 attended the one WPCNR observed).were “conceptual” only and the new project submitted by the selected developer could turn out to be completely different.
The decision on the developer is expected to come in September.
Fot those students of law, Ms. Jobin-Davis refers to the following cases in defining disclosure rights and protocol on the part of the developing agency in Requests for Proposals:
http://www.dos.state.ny.us/coog/ftext/f8937.htm (See paragraph “In the case of RFPs…”)
http://www.dos.state.ny.us./coog/ftext/f8669.htm (See paragraph “When an agency…”)
http://www.dos.state.ny.us/coog/ftext/f9439.htm ( See paragraph “In the case of RFPs…”)










