Roach: Common Council Is Not Declaring Position on Bradley Situation Until Mon.

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey. April 10, 2010 UPDATED 2:35 P.M. E.D.T.: Thomas M. Roach, President of the White Plains Common Council told WPCNR Saturday morning the official position of the Common Council at this time was that it was reserving comment on its position regarding the Mayor Bradley situation until after the Mayor’s court appearance Monday.


John Callahan, Mayor Bradley’s Chief of Staff, in a written statement, Saturday afternoon indicated there were no plans that he knows of for the Mayor and the Common Council to hold a joint news conference after the Mayor’s (scheduled) court appearance Monday, writing:


“I am not aware of any plans for a joint press conference.  If the Mayor holds a press conference, you will be notified.

I directed the e-mail you sent me earlier today to Antoinette Biordi. If the Mayor has a response, she will get back to you.


Mr. Roach, asked earlier Saturday, if he would serve as interim Mayor if Mayor Bradley resigned from his position or took a leave of absence as allowed in the Charter, Roach said “Of course, if that becomes necessary. This is not a political opportunity for me. This is a tragedy.”


Roach said the council never seriously discussed having a news conference Friday calling for Mayor Adam Bradley’s resignation.


Roach said, if they had, the media would have been notified of the plans and (if any, subsequent) cancellation.


Councilman David Buchwald told WPCNR this morning that Mayor Bradley had not called him Friday asking him to withhold any action on holding a press conference until after he (Bradley) had made a decision. Mr. Buchwald said he had no knowledge of other councilpersons having been called by the Mayor.


Mr. Buchwald asked WPCNR to clarify this statement further Saturday afternoon, saying “I do know they (some) were called, I have no knowledge of how many, or any knowledge or specificity of what they were told (by Mayor Bradley).”


 


Members of the Common Council Benjamin Boykin, Milagros Lecouna, Dennis Power and have not, as yet returned WPCNR calls to comment on whether the council was split on the issue of asking Mr. Bradley to resign, or whether they were united that Mr. Bradley should resign — or whether the Mayor was seriously considering resignation.


Mr. Bradley’s court appearance is scheduled for Monday in Domestic Violence court, to take up his charge of Third Degree Assault and five other charges involving alledged incidents with his wife.

Posted in Uncategorized

Curric Chief, WPHS Principal to Retire; 38 Retirements Total

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. April 9, 2010: White Plains High School will be seeking a new Principal over the summer, as Ivan Toper, Principal for six years, after replacing Christine Robbins in 2004 has announced his retirement. Also retiring is Asssitant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, Margaret Dwyer, who has in the last three years been responsible for overseeing a sharp upgrade in middle school test scores. Dwyer has been with the district since 2002.


Also retiring are 6 Office and Custodial workers; 5 Teaching Assistants, and 23 full-time teachers and leaving are 2 Teaching Assistants.


The flurry of retirements are apparently the result of a retirement incentive program approved by the White Plains Teachers Association as part of the newly negotiated and approved extension of their contract through 2012. The contract extension and negotiation of it was not revealed to the public until it was approved by the Board of Education.


The retiring teachers are:


Carolyn Blatt, ESOL Teacher, WPHS,


Margot Brown-Ronin, Special Education Teacher, WPHS


Robert Costabile, Reading Teacher, WPHS


Ellen Epstein, Elementary Teacher, Ridgeway


Marilyn Gomez, Elementary Teacher, Ridgeway


Christine Herzog, Reading Teacher, Middle School, Highlands


Dorothy Holloway, School Counselor, WPHS


Jonathan Hotchkiss, Math Teacher, Middle School, Highlands


Harriette Ketover, Health Teacher, Middle School, Highlands


Mary Marquis, Elementary Teacher, Post Road


James McGuire, English Teacher, Alternative & Supplemental Programs


Joseph Mian, Math Teacher, WPHS


William Miro, Music Teacher, District-wide


Dennis O’Brien, Social Studies Teacher, WPHS


Claire Oram, Reading Teacher, Ridgeway


Judith Phillips, Special Education Teacher, Ridgeway


Edward Potoma, Science Teacher, Alternative & Supplemental Programs


Patricia Quintano, Elementary Education Teacher, Ridgeway


Randi Sack, Elementary Education Teacher, George Washington


Linda Shulman, Elementary Education Teacher, Post Road


Frederick J. Singleton, Social Studies Teacher, Alternative & Supplemental Programs


Joan Traber, Elementary Education Teacher, Ridgeway


Janet Warmbir, English Teacher, Alternative & Supplemental Programs

Posted in Uncategorized

WHITE PLAINS LEADS COUNTY IN CENSUS RESPONSE.

Hits: 0

WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT. Special to WPCNR from Susan Habel, Commissioner of Planning. April 9, 2010:  As of today, the national response rate is 65%, WHITE PLAINS is 63%, Westchester County is 61% and New York State is 59%.


Asked by WPCNR if she had any handle on how White Plains response would affect aid from the federal government, Ms. Habel issued this statement:


“It’s too early to tell because it is subject to total appropriations.


Right now I am concerned about making sure that whatever the size of the pie, we get the biggest piece possible, and that means the best Census returns possible.


I am very impressed with the work of our community organizations and many of our neighborhoods in getting out the response. We have about a month to go and need to make sure everyone we can reach has filed their questionnaire.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Alleged Bradley Incidents Said to Have Violated Original Order of Protection.

Hits: 0

WPCNR POLICE GAZETTE. April 8, 2010 UPDATED 5:50 P.M. with detail from District Attorney’s Complaint: In the complaint filed against Mayor Adam Bradley today in City Court at approximately 3 P.M., the Mayor is accused by Criminal Investigator Aldo Nastasi of the Westchester County District Attorney’s Office of two misdemeanors and one violation based on Mr. Bradley’s alleged actions on March 5, when a temporary restraining order was in effect preventing him from having any contact with his wife, Fumiko; March 10, March 11, March 25 and April 2.


The new charges filed are CONTEMPT IN THE SECOND DEGREE (Misdemeanor); TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS IN THE FOURTH DEGREE (Misdemeanor) and HARASSMENT IN THE SECOND DEGREE (Violation)


Investigator Nastasi alleges, “Defendent’s course of conduct as described herein was in violation of a duly served temporary order of protection issued by Honorable Susan M. Capeci…on March 5, 2010 to remain in effect March 5, 2011, while the defendent was present in court and which he did acknowledge and sign. Said order of protection requires defendent, amongst other things, to refrain from harassment, aggravated harassment, menacing, reckless endangerment, disorderly conduct, intimidation, threats on any criminal offense or interference with the victiom of the alleged offense, Fumiko Bradley.”


The complaint details the dates of the alleged incidents, spelled out in a new signed statement by Fumiko Bradley, taken Monday, April 5, hours after Mr. Bradley appeared in court Monday morning and refused to accept the District Attorney’s indicated willingness to dismiss the charges if Mr. Bradley would volunteer to undergo counseling. M


Mr. Bradley appeared in court on the original Third Degree Assault Charge April 1, several additional charges were added at that time.


The complaint alleges that Mr. Bradley visited Mrs. Bradley in Scarsdale where she was staying on March 5. He is said to have approached Mrs. Bradley, accusing her of lying in the pending criminal action against him. Mr. Bradley is alleged to have claimed Mrs. Bradley was the one who attacked him, that he was defending himself and that the criminal case was going to result in him losing his career. He was said to have spoken in a loud voice that became increasingly louder. Mr. Bradley is alleged to have said Mrs. Bradley should “check herself into a mental hospital for five days.” When Mrs. Bradley asked why, Mr. Bradley is alleged to have said in order to save him and his career she had to either go to a mental hospital and say she was crazy or say that she lied in her statement to the police and go to jail. The complaint says, “defendent’s physical confrontation and verbal barrage did wrongfully attempt to induce the victim from providing testimony in the criminal case and did violate the above referenced temporary order of protection.”


On March 10, the complaint continues, Mr. Bradley is said to have come to 3 Fernwood Road in White Plains where Mrs. Bradley was sleeping. He, the complaint says entered her bedroom, approached her and said “you did it. You lied. It’s all your fault.” He continued to yell, and indicated that if she did not admit she had lied to the police they would “have no future together.”  When Mrs. Bradley asked him to stop, he, the complaint says, “See you’re crazy, you’re emotional.”  The complaint concludes  the defendant’s actions caused the victim, Mrs. Bradley, “to become fearful and to start shaking.”


 


On March 11, the next morning, Mayor Bradley attem[pted to speak with Mrs. Bradley again. At 5:30 that evening, the complaint says the defendent “started yelling at her and blaming her for the criminal charges pending against him. Again, the complaint says this caused the victim to become upset and cry.


On March 25, when Mrs. Bradley was taking a shower at their home, Mr. Bradley is alleged to have entered the bathroom “shouting he had received a telephone call that more e-mails had come out. The defendent screamed, the complaint says, “It’s over. It’s over, you should hang yourself!” Bradley then left, slamming the door.


On April 2, the day after the defendent appeared in court for a pre-trial conference, one week ago,  the complaint reads that Mr. Bradley entered Mrs. Bradley’s residence at 3 Fernwood Road holding The Journal News.  Mr. Bradley, the complaint alleges, then strode over and “hit the victim’s hand that she had been resting on the table several times and said loudly ‘you have to read it. you have to read it.” The victim, Mrs. Bradley then, the complaint narrates, ran upstairs to her bedroom. The victim, to “get away” (the complaint’s wording) from Mr. Bradley then went into the bedroom bathroom. Bradley, the complaint says, followed her into the bathroom and stood in the doorway of the bathroom so Mrs. Bradley was unable to leave. The victim’s mother observed this the complaint says.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

D.A. Office Accuses Bradley of Witness Tampering, Harassment, Contempt

Hits: 0

WPCNR POLICE GAZETTE. By John F. Bailey. April 8, 2010: The District Attorney’s Office today confirmed it has charged Mayor Adam Bradley of White Plains with three new charges relating to the Mayor’s ongoing court matter with his wife, Fumiko:


The charges are Contempt in the Second Degree, Tampering with a Witness in the Fourth Degree, and Harassment in the Second Degree based on alleged actions Mr. Bradley was reported to have participated in between March 5,  and April 2 in interaction with his wife, Fumiko, at Mr. Bradley’s home, 3 Fernwood Road, and other locations.


The Mayor was reported arrested at City Hall by investigators from the District Attorney’s Office. He was arraigned at 3 P.M. in city court and released in his own recognisance, the District Attorney’s Office reported.


A spokesperson for the D.A.’s Office, Lucian Chalfen said it had not been determined yet whether Mr. Bradley would be tried separately on these new charges.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Castelli Bill Brings 1/4% More Sales Tax $$ for City Wouldn’t Raise Sales Tax

Hits: 0

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. From Assemblyman Robert Castelli’s Office. (EDITED) April 8, 2010: Instead of raising the sales tax to 8-1/2% in White Plains in the midst of an economic downturn, Assemblyman Castelli has sponsored Assembly bill 10185, which would transfer approximately one-quarter of one percent of the state’s sales tax share directly to the city of White Plains, increasing the city’s share to two-and-a-half percent, and placing it on par with other large cities in southern Westchester County, without raising the sales tax in White Plains.


Castelli said his plan ends after two years, preventing the need to increase the sales tax while providing needed revenue to the city, and would add to the cities revenue at least $4.3 million for each of the two years it would apply.


Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, Castelli told WPCNR is sponsoring a similar bill which does raise the sales tax perpetually. Castelli said he offered his bill as an alternative to raising taxes on persons living in White Plains and his district. Asked by WPCNR if that was not setting a precedent, (the state dedicating its share of sales tax receipts to a municipality on request), Castelli said he admitted that might be a reason not to support the bill, but he saw it as a way of not raising taxes, and not being perpetual.


Castelli said both his and Ms. Paulin’s bills were going to committee. He said he did not think, being a Republican, that his bill would be reported out of committee, but it was an alternative. He said Ms. Paulin had “graciously invited me to join-sponsor her home rule measure for White Plains, but I thought this was an out of the box alternative.”


 
 
    


The Mayor’s Office in White Plains was contacted to see if they supported Mr. Castelli’s measure and have not returned the query as yet.
      “This legislation is the type of out-of-the box thinking New York taxpayers need.  My plan does not use regressive sales tax to help balance the budget or place an additional burden on homeowners.  What it does is change share of sales tax percentage to ensure that White Plains gets its fair share of funding from the State,” Castelli said.  “It’s a win-win situation.”    
 
            “During these troubling economic times, local governments should not be seeking to increase the property tax levy or the sales tax levy, especially in one of the state’s most populous and economically important cities,” Castelli said.   “Instead, the state should help absorb the financial shortfall during these challenging economic times.”
 
           The legislation would not affect the state budget deficit because it’s generated from revenues that have not been collected on sales that have not taken place, Castelli added. 

            “It is critical to the vitality of the downstate economy that the state does its part to further assist the city of White Plains during the fiscal crisis,” Castelli said.  “By slightly altering the sales tax formula, we can avoid a painful tax increase and provide needed revenue to our local governments.”  

 

Posted in Uncategorized

How Would You Cut the 19% Property Increase?

Hits: 0

WPCNR MR. & MRS. & MS. WHITE PLAINS VOICE. April 7, 2010: Yours truly, has received e-mails, been stopped on the street, and in stores by citizens shocked, shocked at the 19% property tax increase. Even the Common Council, four of whom (Mr. Boykin, Ms. Lecouna, Mr. Roach, Mr. Power) have passed the budgets that have lead to the present budget crisis, is shocked, shocked there is such an historic tax increase. Now the Council and the Mayor are going to “work together” on the budget. What would Mr. and Mrs. White Plains do?


Select from the choices at the right, below are explanations of each suggestion. If you have some, let us know:


 


 


 


Cut Garbage, Recycling, Leaf Pick ups – When suggestions like this were floated last August, the ire of White Plains citizens rose as one when they were asked to bag leaves. But, what if garabage pick up was cut to once a week, and recycling forced to be taken to the city dump? Would this save gas, truck crews, etc.? Sharpen your pencils, let’s find out! Better yet, let’s bring in the carting companies and dump the garbage pickup altogether.


 


Cut Recreation and Parks Programs – A tough choice, I know. But at least raise fees more than they have already so the city makes more money on them. And, let’s dump the programs that are money losers. If people do not use them, why are we running them? Fees for field use should also be raised substantially more than they have for organizations renting the fields, including ones that use the fields free.


 


Close, Curtail the Public Library – A sacred and luxurious cow. How can the city justify $5.3 million – when there are 9 libraries in the 9 school buildings to serve children’s needs – in this budget nightmare?  The public library might be spun off as a self-liquidating fund much like the new administration’s ingenious sewer rent to take the sewer expenditures ($770,000) off the new budget. How they create the fee mechanism that would take it off the books is another matter. That has to be seriously looked at. The library with the advent of the internet is an anachronism. It takes no time at all to find info on the net. You waste incredible time going and finding a book in the labyrinths of the library. Research needs for children are provided at the school system, including computer labs. I know people use it, but it costs the city $5.3 Million a year to run , 18 and a half times the cost of running the Slater Center which caters to a vastly more fragile population.  Am I crazy?


 


Halt Capital Expenditures for One Year – in the budget capital expenditures spending around $8 million in loans, $275,000 cash out of the general fund are called for. Could they be delayed a year? Could the whole capital program really be analyzed hard to see if things are really needed? Probably, yes they are, but the Common Council is always told capital projects are needed.


 


Institute a Wage Cut of 10%  The salaries the city pays in the proposed budget total $76,000,000. If a 10% cut is instituted across the board this would save the city $7.6 Million. Is it possible? What’s involved here?


 


Lay off 100 Employees – The tax increase would be wiped out or at least cut back to manageable size by wholesale layoffs, when you figure benefits and salaries, one hundred layoffs would probably save about $10 Million at the very least.More than enough to replenish the fund balance in one year. It might curtail services, though. City needs to look at combinations of layoffs to see what’s possible.


 


Rezone Overcrowded Housing to raise money from scofflaw Landlords – Fines have not worked; inspections have not worked, but you could solve the city alleged illegal residents’ problem by creating new zoning that would legalize new capacities for residences now overpopulated, but make them subject to weekly inspections. To pay for the inspections and regular official surveillance (something the city is supposed to be doing now, but does not do so effectively – otherwise there would be no overcrowded illegal housing, would there?), owners of these newly legalized buildings would pay through the nose for housing persons unsafely, which would be corrected and profiteering would not be profitable any more. It would be interesting to see how much property tax increase could be defrayed if landlords paid surcharges on what they really made on these scurrilous gold mines that bleed the veins of the poor and the hopeful.


 


Institute Stiff New Certiorari Filing Fee – The real reason the city is in such financial trouble is certioraris filed by property owners in the commercial sector. If their properties are so unprofitable that they are over accessed, they should sell them. However, the city could with a little legal creativity make it very capital intensive for future certiorarists – hit them with a massive certiorari filing fee with the city to defray the city costs of analysis of the certiorari and a full forensic accounting audit of the certiorarists’ books.  The city has never to this reporter’s knowledge forensic-ed any certiorari’s books. I’d say a nice tidy fee of $1,000,000 fee paid up front to cover the cost of a foresenic audit would be nice just for starters. Consider it certiorari “bail.” Make them pay, it might discourage future certs. Better yet, pass a law that any property owner filing certioraris for past year would have to pay the cost of a forensic audit of their books by a private accounting firm supplied by the city.


 


Bond for Certiorari Refunds – The city is currently paying certioraris out of its reserve for financing. The School Board of Education lays off the cost of lousy assessments and ineffectual certiorari analysis by the city by bonding certioraris. The city should do the same thing but, is that good financial practice? For a few years maybe it would help the city, rebuild that fund balance an time to jawbone the certiorari artists down or price them out of the market with paperwork, hoops, filing fees, cost of paying a forensic audit.


 


Establish Infrastructure Charge of Businesses – I can hear the howls of outrage from business owners now. But, it has to be done. The business property owners complain about the high rents, that business  is down, but they stay. Business Property owners, and their tenants,especially retailers and restaurants have to be held accountable for the cost of furnishing the services to their establishments.


 


Charge them for police, fire, sidewalk, parking upkeep, any charge you can think of so they that utilize the city services the most pay the most. This is another idea spawned by the sewer rent legislation this week. Do away with the BID, and let these businesses new charges pay for a real economic development office that will fill their pathetic empty store fronts – negotiate reasonable rents that will contribute to the city economy rather than fuel money windfalls from certiorari filings from deliberately devaluing their properties for a profit.


 


Raise Taxi Fees add surcharge – With the windfall in taxi medallions, the city should raise taxi fees, which would help cab owners, and by raising them enough…they could add a little something extra, better a lot of something extra, a green fee perhaps. How much this could raise needs to be researched. But a $4 green fee, half to the cab owner and half to the city…direct into the general fund per rider would not be missed. If you need a cab, you need a cab right?


 


Consolidate City Departments – The Parking/ Recreation and Parks merger was intriguing. How about merging Planning with Building – One Commissioner. Merge Purchase with Finance. Put Department of  Traffic in Public Safety. Let’s eliminate the Department of Information Services, and outsource it. Merge Assessment into Finance. Put Rec and Parks in the Youth Bureau. Why didn’t we think of this decades ago? Let’s “Feinerize.”

Posted in Uncategorized

$1.6 Million Sales Tax Shortfall if 8% erosion of Sales Tax Continues.

Hits: 0

WPCNR QUILL & EYESHADE By John F. Bailey. April 7, 2010 UPDATED 4:28 P.M. E.D.T.: If last year’s sales tax collection pace in March, April, May, and June is duplicated, the city will still come in $500,000 short  of the predicted $43.5 million in sales tax plugged into the new city budget released Monday. If sales tax continues at is present pace of decline (8%), the city will miss it by $1.6 Million.


 


Meeting, or beating last year’s March, April, May and June sales tax receipts paces would be most welcome, and would show a “recovery in White Plains retail” was on the way.


 


It would be a significant reversal of the sales tax trend since July, which has seen sales tax decline in 7 of the first 8 months of the city fiscal year a consistent decline rate of 8%, though it has slowed from the 11% had been running.


 


 


Presently the city has collected $29,087,681 in sales tax through February. If they collect the $13,897,662 the city received last year in March, April, May and June they will collect $42,985,342  a half million short of the projection in the budget released Monday, $43.5 Million.


 


If the present rate of decline in the sales tax (8%) continues to be reflected in March, April, May and June figures, this would mean a decline of $1,111,812 creating a final sales tax for 2009-10 of $41,873,530, or a $1,626,470 short of the prediction.


 


More Tax Increases? More Cuts? Cross Your Fingers


 


A solution for this untidy gap if it materializes, might  require an additional tax hike of 3.7% to close the gap outright, raising the present 19% proposed tax hike to 22.7% (23%). Mr. Genito said Monday that 1% in the tax rate is equal to $440,000 of expenditures. Genito said that if the sales tax declines, a combination of cuts or higher tax increase would have to be considered to keep the tax rate where it is.


 


1/4% Sales Tax Increase Off the Table. 


 


Mayor Adam Bradley  encountered at a public service announcement taping at Saxon Woods Pool yesterday  for the March of Dimes Baby Walk, was asked by WPCNR if he would consider dedicating the ¼% sales tax increase he is seeking from the legislature to the 2010-11 budget fund to supplement the general revenues and perhaps lower the tax increase projected by his budget substantially.


 


Bradley said he is calling for the ¼% tax increase to preserve the city bond rating and to rebuild fund balance, a cornerstone of bringing the city back to sound financial principles, he feels.


 


Bradley indicated pouring the additional ¼% sales tax increase into the general fund was “off the table.”


 


Mr.Genito, the Budget Director/Commissioner of Finance had advised reporters Monday the ¼% is worth about $5 to6 Million in additional revenues for the city if the legislature passes it.


 


WPCNR figures  diverting the ¼% sales tax increase out of fund balance, should the city receive the increase, to the general fund would lower the required tax increase to a more manageable 6%, only $163/$1,000 of assessed valuation instead of the $187/ $1,000 of assessed valuation, called for in the budget.


 


Your fund balance or your bond rating or your tax bill.


 


However, the city faces a dilemma. Mr. Genito, advised media in a statement by e-mail, that, “At the end of fiscal 2010 (June 30, 2010) we estimate that total fund balance will be approximately $11 million, with $2.1 Million reserved,$5 Million appropriated for the 2010-11 budget,$2.4 Million designated for tax certiorari, leaving $1.5 million as undesignated.


 


The 2011 proposed budget provides that at the end of fiscal 2011, $2.1 million will be reserved,$1.5 million appropriated for the fiscal 2012 budget, $2.4 million for tax certs, $4.9 million in the tax stabilization fund (remember this is subject to passage of the ¼% increase in sales tax rate), and $5.9 million as undesignated.”


 


Mr. Genito explained to WPCNR that the$5.9 million in undesignated fund balance he says going to 2012 would be from cost savings in the newbudget year. In an e-mail, Mr. Genito explained:


 


Given the above, the $5.9M forecast for undesignated is separate and distinct from the $4.9M for tax stabilization. The $4.9M is not included in the $5.9M. The $5.9M is a forecast of what our net revenues might be over expenditures, assuming improved financial management and an improved economy.


The choice Mr. Bradley and the council faces, WPCNR notes is to restore fund balance, revenue has to be diverted, but to do so would mean substantial city cuts or historically high tax increases.


 


April 12 Looms.


 


Perhaps good news showing an increase in sales tax for March will be forthcoming on Monday when the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance issues the figures.

Posted in Uncategorized

Petitions to File to Run for Board of Education Due April 28.

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. April 7, 2010: Two seats on the White Plains Board of Education will be up for election during the School District Budget vote May 18.


Petitions are available to residents at the School District Headquarters, 5 Homeside Lane. One hundred signatures are needed to obtain a slot on the ballot.


Presently, two incumbents have taken out petitions, Charles Norris and Sheryl Brady, to run for reelection.


Petitions are due April 28. For further information, contact the Clerk to the School Board, Michele Schoenfeld.


To run for the school board, you must be a resident of White Plains and over the age of 18, and a resident of the city for one year.

Posted in Uncategorized