Hits: 0
WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. From Westchester County Department of Communications. May 19, 2011:
County Executive Robert P. Astorino today vetoed the redistricting plan for county legislative districts approved last week by the Board of Legislators.
“There are many reasons for my disapproval and veto of this local law,” said Astorino, “which vary from the flawed, closed-door, and rushed process to the unfortunate and unnecessary division of municipalities.”
He added, “The non-partisan League of Women Voters of Westchester in its statement at the public hearing was very clear in sharing some of these same concerns. It labeled the process ‘extremely messy’ with ‘aspects of it…questionable.’ The League also called for more transparency.”
Westchester Board of Legislators Chairman Ken Jenkins released the following statement today in response to County Executive Robert P. Astorino’s veto of the legislative re-districting plan approved by the Board last week:
“The re-districting plan approved by the Board of Legislators was the result of a careful and thoughtful process that included full bi-partisan participation, open deliberations and well-publicized opportunities for comments and objections from county residents.”
The county executive said the board’s rushed process called into question the ability of the public to have real input.
“Your Honorable Board held the first meeting (at least the first meeting known to the public and the administration) on April 18,” Astorino said in his veto message. “Within 20 days, your Honorable Board voted on this local law, which will affect the county for the next 10 years. Such quick action calls into question the ability for true public input. Note, too, that this 20-day period was in the midst of important religious holidays and spring break, further diluting the availability for full public participation.”
Astorino said there is no legal requirement for the board to adopt a redistricting plan this year based on Census 2010; rather, it could have deliberated longer and adopted a plan for the 2013 election cycle. Taking more time over this important issue would have given the board a chance to focus on the new Census data, which was only released in April.
Aside from the process, the county executive complained of what he called “wholesale and unnecessary changes” made to some legislative districts, including the splitting of the City of Peekskill “for no rational reason” into two districts and the Town of Harrison into three.
“It will create confusion among voters and elected officials as to who speaks for these communities on the Board of Legislators,” he said.
Jenkins disagreed, saying in his written statement on the veto —
“In the end, the Board of Legislators adopted new district maps that are fair and hard to fault. The fact that the re-districting was completed extremely close to the existing lines, with necessary changes the result of population shifts, was clearly understood by most Westchester residents, since less than a handful voiced an opinion otherwise. As for the League of Women Voters’ request that the new district lines be drawn from scratch, it was generally acknowledged by the legislators as being too costly and time-consuming to do so.
“Because of his regrettable abhorrence for any achievements emanating from the Board, including our landmark 2.2% reduction in the tax levy this year, the County Executive’s veto of the re-districting plan does not surprise me or my colleagues. Our overriding his veto should not surprise him either. His decision should not get in the way of the important work that is in front of us.
“I want to recognize the hard work that the Board’s re-districting consultant, Dr. Andrew Beveridge, and Legislation Committee Chairman John Nonna contributed to this formidable task. These two individuals bent over backwards to accommodate all requests, inquiries and suggestions during the re-districting process. Chairman Nonna presided over open discussions about re-drawn district lines the minute new mapping first started, with legislators from both parties and two representatives from the League of Women Voters seated around the table reviewing changes district by district. He is to be commended in this regard.”




