Alex Philippidis Remembers 9/11

Hits: 347

WPCNR NEWS AND COMMENT. From Alex Philippidis of Genome Web Daily News, Mary Ann Leibert, Inc.  September 11, 2016:

Alex, well-known local reporter around Westchester County for the last 30 years sent along this remembrance.

Two weeks after 9/11, I wrote this article sharing this story of something good that came from something evil… No link to this story exists any more, so I copy it in its entirety below:

Helping the heroes

From: Westchester County Business Journal, Oct. 1, 2001

“The World Trade Center should, because of its importance, become a living representation of man’s belief in humanity, his need for individual dignity, his belief in the cooperation of men, and through this cooperation, his ability to find greatness.” – Minoru Yamasaki, architect of the Twin Towers

Nearly three weeks have passed, but the memories are as fresh as ever for Jay Martino and 50 of his colleagues about the hell they witnessed at Ground Zero of the terrorist attacks that leveled the World Trade Center.

“It’s an unimaginable site of destruction. You search your mind to come up with the right verbiage, the right adjectives. How can I describe what I saw? It’s a horrific scene,” said Martino, a general superintendent with Granite/Halmar Construction Co. of Mount Vernon.

Martino, head of the Masons & Concrete Contractors Association of Hudson Valley Inc., led a team of workers who answered their industry’s call to send volunteers and heavy machines to the tons of wreckage that comprised the Twin Towers and five smaller buildings.

Granite/Halmar was among dozens of construction contractors in and around Westchester that sent resources to the World Trade Center in response to a memo distributed to all 650 members of the Construction Industry Council (CIC) of Westchester and Hudson Valley Inc. of Tarrytown.

Yonkers Contracting Co., which helped build the World Trade Center in the 1970s, donated 100 trucks to the rescue effort, while Tilcon New York Inc. of West Nyack and four subcontractors donated equipment and personnel from their 21 quarry and asphalt facilities in New York and New Jersey.

“I think more than any other industry, construction contractors and workers comprehend the enormity of the task at hand because we understand the magnitude of what it takes to create such magnificent structures and buildings,” said Ross J. Pepe, CIC president.

“Everyone in our industry has a deep and new-found appreciation of the ironworkers, operating engineers, laborers, Teamsters and other union workers now at the site as the world watches these guys on TV doing a job that nobody would ever want to do.”

The World Trade Center took half a decade to build, but only two hours for terrorists to level in the series of attacks that shook the world on Sept. 11.

County construction industry responds
The following day when CIC asked for volunteers, hundreds answered the call. Fifty of them came from Granite/Halmar, which had hired them for its many projects under construction – such as the new international arrivals terminal and an expansion of the British Airways terminal at John F. Kennedy International Airport.

“They said they needed cutoff saws, tools, oxygen tanks, manpower. So I put the call out to all of our foreman asking if any of them would volunteer,” Martino recalled “We loaded a half-dozen pickup trucks with oxygen and acetylene gas tanks, plus dust masks, goggles, safety glasses.”

The Granite/Halmar men joined other CIC member companies in assembling at Yonkers Raceway, then following a state police escort south to lower Manhattan. Authorities have divided the area in and around the World Trade Center into four zones, each overseen by a construction contractor: AMEC p.l.c.; Tully Construction Inc.; a joint venture of Turner Construction and Plaza Materials Inc.; and Bovis Lend Lease and two subcontractors, Grace Industries Inc. and Gateway.

Granite/Halmar entered the site working for AMEC, which controls the northwest zone of the recovery area, Granite/Halmar had worked for AMEC at the Kennedy airport projects.

“We hooked up with a firefighter, a captain. He escorted us to ground zero. Right away we went to work with the firemen. They were elated to see us. They had nothing. They had no cutoff saws we could see. They had one set of torches. They were working their way through the pile of rubble with picks and shovels. Everything was done by hand,” Martino said.

“We were cutting steel into pieces. We took everything we could handle and loaded it into 5-gallon barrels, then kept passing them on down the line,” Martino said. “We worked till late in the evening, 11 or 12 o’clock at night.

“It was just amazing, the amount of debris and structural steel there was around. You stood on steel beams that had just collapsed. You’d look at the steel and it was completely clean.

There was no concrete to be found. You didn’t see any chunks of concrete. The fire was so great the concrete had disintegrated.
“You’d see bits and pieces of carpet, and every once in a while, there would be a bumper to a vehicle. You stood on the steel beams which had collapsed,” Martino said.

Not once during their time at Ground Zero did Martino or his men spot any bodies, or any parts of bodies.

“I was not looking forward to anything like that. I was looking to help and I would have gone anywhere I was told to go. But I kept wondering. What would I do if I saw something? How would I react?”

An especially welcome sight, Martino said, was the hundreds of volunteers who catered to weary rescuers: “Every time you turned around, you heard. Do you need something to drink? Do you want something to eat? They had buckets of water and Gatorade. They had Power Bars.”

Just three years ago Martino and workers from GraniteHalmar’s predecessor, Halmar Builders of New York Inc., transformed the drab exterior public space outside the World Trade Center into World Trade Center Plaza, a public plaza complete with granite pavement and landscaped areas.

Looking at a poster-sized photo of the plaza outside his office, Martino paused. “I feel funny seeing the pictures of it now.”

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

The Day We Were All Connected: Trade Center Destruction Brought a Country Together.

Hits: 204

WPCNR NEWS & COMMENT. From the WPCNR archives. Written by John F. Bailey on September 11, 2001:

In the worst premeditated surprise attack on any nation anywhere, with loss of life in the thousands, the World Trade Center Towers collapsed into rubble Tuesday morning by 10:30 AM and we all realized how connected we are.

No novelist has imagined this disaster. It is all too real and horrible. Not since the Hindenburg disaster have I heard radio reporting so emotional. Not since Hiroshima and Nagasaki has there been such loss of life in a single attack. As the attacks mounted every 15 minutes observed one radio reporter, America realized how connected we all are. At least this reporter did.

What impressed this reporter, was how connected we all really are here in America. A candidate for office worried about their treasurer’s wife who works in the Trade Center. I worried about my nephew, just starting his new job this summer in lower Manhattan, and I do not know exactly where he works. My brother-in-law called from Miami to see if my wife was all right. (She is.) My wife saw the towers collapse from her mid-town offices. (I asked her today September 11, 2016) fifteen years later how she felt seeing the towers collapsed. She hesitated, saying “I don’t know. I was in the moment.”)

A friend of mine called to see if my wife was all right, too, fifteen years ago. Then he mentioned what about those children in school who have parents working in those buildings? It was a sobering, angering thought.

Sobering because, you knew some of them had to have lost their parents. You just knew that.

Our very communicative society was communicating, phonelines were jammed. Everyone thought of loved ones or persons they knew that perhaps worked down there.

Persons watching the horror unfold, broke down in front of their televisions. Breaking down, because of the sense that there was nothing they could do. (I listened to the attacks unfold on the radio. I did not watch it on television.)

As I write this at 12 noon today (September 11, 2001), the end of these maniacal acts (a very appropriate description from one WOR reporter) is not in sight. But, when it does end, and it will, let’s remember how connected we feel to those entombed in the Trade Center rubble.

Let’s pull together and work together more, like those brave New York City Firefighters who obviously were trapped in the buildings when they collapsed. The police who obviously have died trying to evacuate the innocents within. I don’t want to hear any more knocks on the NYPD.

2016 Reflection:

I remembered that connection and the Candlelight Walk that took place in White Plains two weeks later where easily 7,000 people filled Main Street from the railroad station to City Hall holding candles to just be together and feel together and connected. 

How we have changed since September 11, 2015. We are a nation no longer remotely connected. We have persons running for President blaming our troubles on other Americans. We have people running for President on messages without substance, putting their hopes in failed ideas of the past in both parties. Talking big but having nothing big to say. 

There is no connection between Americans today.

Respect for each others’ views no longer exists. The importance of  putting the truth out and dealing with the reality of our challenges is not being faced by our leaders, our politicians, our educators, our health providers, our media. It is a shambles.The blame era began with the fall of the Towers.

No one now needs to take any responsibility, just blame someone else: It’s immigrants; it’s the far right; it is Wall Street; it’s the banks; the insurance companies; it’s companies exporting jobs to avoid taxes; it’s the oil companies; it’s the media;  Have I missed anyone? None of these institutions take responsibility for when they make a mistake. 

It would be nice if we could go back to that brief time after 2001 when we pulled together.

Thought how our actions, words, feelings, and dependence on self-interest so prevalent today effects other people. 

Can we recapture that September 11, 2001 compassion Americans showed to each other, the mutual respect, when you’d hug strangers to comfort them?

As the hero in Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises said to Brett, the heroine when she says 

“Oh, Jake, we could have had such a damned good time together.”

Jake replies:

“Yes,” I said. “Isn’t it pretty to think so?”

But our country and all of us it need to do that figure out how to have a damned good time together, and make things work.

At the 9/11 ceremonies today is a good time to begin.

Posted in Uncategorized

JUDGE MAY RULE ON TRIAL MOTION ON THE KENNETH CHAMBERLAIN SUIT MONDAY

Hits: 144

WPCNR WHITE PLAINS LAW JOURNAL. Special to WPCNR SEPTEMBER 10, 2016:

Newman and Ferrara, attorneys for the Kenneth Chamberlain family have called a news conference for Monday afternoon and have issued this news release:

United States District Judge Cathy Seibel may issue a ruling in her courtroom on Monday, September 12, 2016, at 3:15 p.m. on a motion that will determine whether the case, regarding the fatal shooting of 68-year old former Marine Kenneth Chamberlain, Sr. by the White Plains police, will proceed to trial.

The White Plains police responded to the accidental activation of Mr. Chamberlain’s medical alert device in the early morning hours of November 19, 2011.  Mr. Chamberlain refused the police entry into his apartment, repeatedly telling them he was fine and did not require assistance. A little over one hour later, the police broke down Mr. Chamberlain’s door and fired at him with a Taser and a less lethal or “bean bag” shotgun. Police Officer Anthony Carelli then fired his service weapon and fatally wounded Mr. Chamberlain.

Following almost two years of discovery, the City of White Plains and Officer Carelli filed motions for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the case.

Attorneys for Mr. Chamberlain opposed the motion and pointed to evidence that Mr. Chamberlain, who was in very poor health, was shot and killed as he lay on the ground after being knocked down by four powerful blasts from the bean bag shotgun.

According to Debra S. Cohen, an attorney for the Chamberlain family, “We hope that Monday will bring us an important step closer to achieving justice for Kenneth Chamberlain, Sr. and greater awareness of the need for changes in how police respond to these types of situations.”

###

Posted in Uncategorized

WHITE PLAINS WEEK PRESENTS COMPLETE COVERAGE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL FASNY SETTLEMENT MEETING. SEE THE FRIDAY SHOW INSTANTLY ON THE INTERNET AT YOUTUBE OR WPCommunitymedia.org

Hits: 146

2016520 042

WHITE PLAINS WEEK

“FASNY NEWS SPECIAL”

PETER KATZ AND JIM BENEROFE 

TAKE YOU THROUGH THE TUESDAY NIGHT

COMMON COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE FASNY SETTLEMENT

EXCLUSIVE INSIGHTFUL VIDEO PACKAGE AND STATEMENTS

SEE IT INSTANTLY NOW

IN CRYSTAL-CLEAR PICTURE, HI-DEFINITION WITH, CRISP SOUND AT

www.whiteplainsweek.com

OR

ON YOUTUBE 

AT

OR
www.WPcommunitymedia.org
PLUS
THE BRYANT AVENUE MORNING JAM AT HEATHERBLOOM
TIM CONNORS DEPARTS SCHOOL DISTRICT END OF SEPTEMBER
AND THE DOGS SWIM AT KITTRELL POOL

 

Posted in Uncategorized

A Most Unsettling Settlement: Gedney Association Statement on the FASNY VOTE

Hits: 129

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. SEPTEMBER 9, 2016:

Dear John,

The Common Council’s hastily called meeting on Tuesday night to consider a Settlement agreement on the FASNY matter was a new low for open government in White Plains.

The Mayor and Common Council members, Kirkpatrick, Martin and Smayda ignored the numerous requests by citizens from all over the City to postpone any decision on the “Stipulation of Agreement.”

In fact, they voted against a motion by Councilman Dennis Krolian to defer any decision on the Stipulation of Agreement for thirty days so that he and other Council members could fully evaluate the Stipulation.

Such a postponement is routinely granted by the Common Council as a courtesy.  The Council quickly voted 4-3 to the Stipulation of Agreement with Council members Lecuona, Krolian, and Hunt-Robinson expressing well-reasoned arguments against the resolution.

Can anyone argue this “Settlement” vote was not an obvious attempt to circumvent the earlier vote of the Council which did not muster the requisite super-majority vote?

The Common Council chambers and outer hallway were filled with FASNY opponents despite the Agenda only publicly noticed on Thursday evening before the Labor Day weekend.   There were a number of FASNY representatives and supporters present including Andrea Soros-Colombel, the Chair of the school who appeared quite pleased by the Council’s action.  You may recall she earlier published a very threatening letter warning our elected officials that if they dared vote against the FASNY plan a series of lawsuits would ensue.

Lest anyone forget FASNY failed in its application last year after a full public airing of the project.

The City’s appeal to the Appellate Court was viewed to be strong.  What transpired Tuesday night should alarm every citizen of White Plains regardless of party affiliation or view on FASNY.

This “Settlement” was crafted behind closed doors with no input from the public and virtually no opportunity for the Council members who voted against the FASNY road closure to express their views.

Interestingly, the name of City’s outside attorney, Mr. Robert Spolzino, who provided such an excellent defense against the FASNY suit, was conspicuously absent from the Stipulation of Agreement.

The “Settlement” turns on its head the earlier Environmental Findings by the Council that explicitly stated that FASNY could not use Ridgeway as its entrance to the complex nor local streets such as Hathaway Lane.

Remarkably, the “FASNY FOUR” (the Mayor and Council members Kirkpatrick, Martin and Smayda) are now considering de-designating Parcel A as an “Environmentally Sensitive Site” – a blatant and transparent attempt to avoid the requirement for a super-majority vote.

Thankfully, the Common Council decision has generated outrage from all sectors of our City.  Attempts to trash our zoning laws, land use decisions and the will of the people have raised the ire of all proponents of good and open government.

The Gedney Association intends to plan and coordinate its efforts with the neighborhood associations already on record against the FASNY project as well as other citizens who believe the integrity of our land use review process has collapsed to special interests.

The Gedney Association

Posted in Uncategorized

THIS WEEK ON PEOPLE TO BE HEARD–JULIE KILLIAN CANDIDATE FOR STATE SENATE DIST. 37 (WHITE PLAINS)( IS INTERVIEWED SEE IT INSTANTLY NOW ON THE INTERNET AT YOUTUBE OR WPCommunitymedia

Hits: 97

THIS WEEK ON 

PEOPLE TO BE HEARD

“THE TRISTATES’ MOST RELEVANT INTERVIEW PROGRAM”

YOU’VE GOT

2016908killian 005JULIE KILLIAN OF RYE

CANDIDATE FOR THE 37TH  STATE SENATE DISTRICT

INTERVIEWED BY

JOHN BAILEY, PETER KATZ AND JIM BENEROFE

IN CRYSTAL CLEAR VIDEO, HI-DEFINITION SHARP AUDIO ON

www.whiteplainsweek.com

INSTANTLY ON YOU TUBE

OR
www.wpcommunitymedia.org

SEE HER SATURDAY NIGHT AT 7 PM ON CHANNEL 76 WHITE PLAINS CABLEVISION 

OR

VERIZON FIOS CHANNEL 45 THROUGHOUT WESTCHESTER COUNTY

2016908killian 002

Posted in Uncategorized

SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERVIEWING FOR NEW INTERIM SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS. CONNORS, CURRENT INTERIM, WILL LEAVE DISTRICT AT END OF SEPTEMBER.

Hits: 91

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. Special to WPCNR from the White Plains City School District. SEPTEMBER 7, 2016:

8-CONNORS FRIED

TIMOTHY CONN0RS (left) to Depart end of September. A new Interim Superintendent of Schools is being searched for to continue to substitute for Dr. Paul Fried, who continues on sick leave, the School District announced today.

MICHELE SCHOENFELD SAID THAT TIMOTHY CONNORS, WHO HAS BEEN THE INTERIM SUPERINTENDENT SINCE JUNE, WILL NO LONGER BE INTERIM SUPERINTENDENT.

CONNORS HAS BEEN REPLACING DR. PAUL FRIED WHO MS. SCHOENFELD SAID IS ON SICK LEAVE.

SCHOENFELD TOLD WPCNR THAT THE BOARD IS NOW ACTIVELY INTERVIEWING FOR A NEW INTERIM SUPERINTENDENT WHILE DR. FRIED CONTINUES ON SICK LEAVE, WHILE STILL UNDER CONTRACT TO THE DISTRICT.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Common Council Twice Refuses to Table Consideration of Settlement of FASNY suit, then approves it by 4-3 vote.

Hits: 97

WP_20160904_10_33_26_Pro

THE COMMON COUNCIL VOTED TO APPROVE A TEMPORARY SETTLEMENT OF THE FASNY LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CITY OF WHITE PLAINS IN ORDER THAT THEY MAY REVIEW THIS ALTERNATIVE SITE PLAN AND SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION. THE SITE IS EXPLAINED IN DETAIL IN THE WPCNR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE DAY  IF YOU SCROLL DOWN THIS COLUMN

 

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. Special to WPCNR from Peter Katz on the Scene. With Released Comments Provided by the French American School of New York. September 6, 2016: 

Peter Katz reporting for WPCNR this evening, reports the Common Council approved the settlement  of a lawsuit filed by  the French American School of New York against the city, before an overflow crowd of persons attending the council meeting tonight at City Hall.

“Citizens to be Heard” the pre-council meeting feature was packed with speakers mostly against approving the settlement, Mr. Katz said.

Katz said the ordinances 76 and 77 items approving the settlement with the school were taken out of order and put at the top of the proceeding. Councilman Dennis Krolian proposed a motion to table Ordinance 76 and the Council voted 4 to 3 not to table. Krolian next proposed to table Ordinance 77, the Stipulation of Settlement, and again the Council voted 4 to 3 not to table.

Then the Council voted 4 to 3 approving the Settlement.

Voting to approve the Statement of Settlement were Mayor Roach, and Councilpersons John Kilpatrick, John Martin and Beth Smayda.

Councilpersons Nadine Hunt-Robinson, Dennis Krolian and Milagros Lecuona voted against approving settlement.

Mr.  Katz said Mayor Thomas Roach, casting the deciding vote, said the settlement was not approving the amended site plan, that it was just putting the lawsuit “on hold,” while the new plan was considered. Mayor Roach, Katz reports, said  that FASNY could have filed a new site plan at any time. Mr.Katz reports that the Mayor emphasized he had not made up his mind on the new plan FASNY will be submitting.

9 Weeks to the new plan

That new plan will be officially in about 9 weeks, if you go by the Stipulation of Settlement text, to wit:

After Judge Lefkowitz signs the Statement of Settlement, the city will have 14 days, to provide “an itemized list of documents and submissions necessary to make the Alternative Site Plan Application complete…FASNY will file its Alternative Site Plan Application for the site plan approval and a special permit within seven (7) weeks after this order is approved by the court.”

 

Next, Judge Joan Lefkowitz has to sign the Stipulation of Settlement. Mr. Katz there is no schedule as to when Judge Lefkowitz will sign the order, but Katz says the city has regular morning meetings with the judge.

Andrea Colombel, Board Chairperson of FASNY in a 10 PM news release from FASNY said, “We expect the judge to sign the agreement in the next few days which will give the Court authority to oversee the review process. We expect a timely and fair review and look forward to putting a shovel in the ground. FASNY is a wonderful school with a vibrant community which will contribute to the City of White Plains and its residents for many years to come,” she added.

Katz interviewed John Botti of the French American School who told him the school as a gesture of “good faith” has already filed in court a conservation easement that will guarantee public access to the lands reserved for the nature conservancy.

In a statement issued at 10 PM this evening, The French American School  Chairperson of the Board, Ms. Andrea Columbel had these comments on the conservancy:

“As a matter of good faith to resolve the dispute, FASNY has already recorded and created a 51-acre publically accessible Conservancy on part of its land with plans to create east-west and north-south pedestrian and bicycle paths for neighborhood residents, as previously proposed.  Known as “Parcel D,” the land has frontage on Bryant Avenue, North Street and Hathaway Lane.

“It has just become the largest private conservation easement in Westchester south of Interstate 287, and the first in the City of White Plains.  The conservation easement assures that the property cannot be developed, and will ultimately be open to the public. The conservation easement, which is the largest in White Plains, will   include miles of bike/pedestrian trails safely connecting the neighborhood.

“The reduction in conservation easement from the 78 acres offered by FASNY in the original plan reflects the 35 percent reduction in the size of the school buildings and the 33 percent reduction in the student population under the Alternative Plan.

“We are deeply appreciative for the continued and growing support we have received from thousands of residents and businesses across White Plains.  We look forward to moving forward and putting this unfortunate delay behind us,” Colombel said.

The terms of the proposed Stipulation of Settlement, according to the FASNY news release include that:

  • The Upper School (grades 6-12) will be built on the already developed portion of the site (“Parcel A”) where the clubhouse and other facilities of the former Ridgeway Country Club now stand.
  • Hathaway Lane will remain open.
  • No environmentally sensitive features on the site will be impacted.
  • The Lower School (Nursery through 5th grade) is eliminated from the application reducing student population by 33 percent from 950 to 640, reducing building square footage by 35 per cent, and significantly reducing traffic by another 42 percent.

Under the proposed Stipulation of Settlement, the Common Council would agree that this plan presents a potentially reasonable alternative for resolving and settling the outstanding litigation.  The Council would also agree to provide the Alternative Plan a diligent and fair review in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, mutually agreed to milestones, Court-ordered oversight for the review process, and the staying of all litigation until the Alternative Plan is determined by the city under its normal public review procedures.

 “We are gratified that the Common Council has approved the settlement agreement. Tonight’s vote is long overdue and represents a win-win for the City and the FASNY community.  All parties can now put aside costly litigation and concentrate on obtaining final approvals for a compromise school plan,” said Andrea Colombel, Board Chairperson of FASNY.

 

Posted in Uncategorized

THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL GET LETTERS LOTS AND LOTS OF LETTERS

Hits: 165

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. From The Gedney Association September 7, 2016:

The Gedney Association has shared a sampling of letters questioning why the city is considering settling the FASNY lawsuit tonight

Dear Representatives of the People of White Plains,

Wondering why there has been such a faux pas made on your part  not to notify your constituents in an timely and fair manner of the above cited meeting…
I respectfully and firmly request that you postpone your vote on this action in order to give your White Plains constituents enough time to review and challenge the ongoing threat to their community from FASNY.

As you all know, the citizens of the city of White Plains are notified by the mayor of any changes to our garbage/recycling pick up due to holiday or storm. This is done in a timely fashion in order to keep us informed.

No such courtesy of keeping us, your constituents, informed has been extended to us, the citizens of White Plains, about this important meeting tonight to vote on this incredibly inappropriate project.

No notification until the last minute about a crucial meeting is also inappropriate and unfair to your constituents. The decisions made at this meeting will impact hundreds of White Plains families, their livelihood and the living conditions for their families for many many years, no, more accurately, indefinitely.
Many people from FASNY who will not be personally impacted by this inappropriate development obviously have known, in advance, that this meeting would address this issue and vote. They will be prepared. What about your neighbors and fellow White Plains taxpayers? Not so much… This might be called an unfair advantage.

I truly question how you, my representatives, in good conscience, can proceed with this meeting.

My other question to you, my representatives, is who are you supporting and protecting during this never ending nightmare?   If you, in good conscience, can enumerate a strong list of positive benefits that would out weigh the multiple negative effects of this inappropriate project, please let us, your constituents,  know what they are. We can find no redeeming features at all.  Not one…

Most sincerely,
Your constituent,
Joanne T. Dunphy

————————————————

Settlement?

Dear friends:
(Briefly, because your inboxes must be inundated – though with good reason.)
I am at a loss to understand:
1 – How the City is ready to give up on a case it could have won.
2 – How the small vocal pro-FASNY minority had advance knowledge.
3 – How this was kept from the public until just a few days ago.
4 – How you are now entertaining a plan in many ways worse.
5 – How you can believe that they will stop at 650, and not add the rest later.
        And I still don’t understand:
6 – How any one of you believes that this project would benefit the City.

My take-away lesson – and I’m not a lawyer, but this must be in a first-year law-school class – is that in any litigation there should be one attorney on each side, not both on one side.  From where the public sits, it would appear that, to put it politely, the City has not been well served by its corporation counsel.
I hope that in this hasty vote and in the proceedings which inevitably follow, at least one more member of the Council will come to his or her senses and represent the interests of the citizens of White Plains.
Paul Schwarz

________________________________________________

To the Mayor and Common Council

Please tell us that the article in White Plains Patch quoting a Gedney resident: David Kohl? Who he? — I’ve lived in Gedney farms for 13 years and never heard of him prior to his efforts as a paid media consultant for FASNY or met him at any community function — was just an inflammatory  PR ploy and speculation.
What is white Plains Neighbors ACT if not an active  publicity arm created for FASNY? It was formed in Dec 2015 by FASNY to advocate for them; it does NOT REPRESENT this community! Just Google it for the true picture!
,
Nothing has changed about the situation that led to a defeat to the plan to close an important thoroughfare and destroy a neighborhood — the street is still a main artery, the property is still heavily wetland, the greater Gedney, North Ave, Havilands, Highlands, Hillair Circle, Carhart, community is opposed.  A slightly smaller FASNY doesn’t mitigate any of these issues!

You are our elected representatives. JUST SAY NO!

Elaine Taylor Gordon

______________________________________________________

What a Tangled Web…

To the mayor and council:

We are at a loss to understand your lack of transparency regarding the “Stipulation of Settlement” and what appears to be our city government caving to intimidation while totally ignoring so many of the long time residents/taxpayers of White Plains and working behind our backs with a small but obviously influential pro-FASNY minority.

Those of you supporting the “Stipulation of Settlement” are the city’s own worst enemies.

You had a winning case and now it appears some of you are betraying those of us you were elected to represent.

The situation is a disgrace and the way in which it was done is totally distasteful.

At the very least please have the decency to table any vote on this so-called “Stipulation of Settlement” due to inadequate notice to the majority of the public whom you were elected to serve.

Frances & George Jones

————————————————

Dear Mayor Roach and members of the White Plains Common Council,

Over this holiday weekend I received word that on the Tuesday following Labor Day the Common Council will consider a proposal made by the French American School of New York to stipulate to discontinue, without prejudice, its lawsuit against the City of White Plains. According to published sources, the proposed stipulation was provided to members of the Common Council on Thursday evening, September 1, 2016.

I urge you to table any vote that might come before the Common Council on this matter on September 6th.

The residents of White Plains elected you to serve the City.The City of White Plains gains nothing by rushing this proposal to vote on such short notice. There is something rotten in the City of White Plains when a vote related to a development project that could affect thousands of White Plains resident gets placed on the agenda for a meeting of the Common Council with only one business day’s notice to the constituents you were elected to serve.

The appearance of impropriety is staggering.

Claudia G. Jaffe, Esq.

_____________________________________

Dear Mayor Roach and Members of the Common Council,

We are writing to each of you about the proposed Stipulation of Settlement with The French American School of New York.

We find it hard to understand that after more than 5 years of evaluating this proposal, much of it with public discussion and input you would hold this most important meeting tonight without ample time for the public to comment.

The entire SEQRA process is predicated on comments from the public.

Please allow time for public input by the people who would be most affected by this project and who should be able to review the Stipulation in a more through manner.

Residents should be afforded the same courtesy FASNY was clearly afforded.

Thank you.
Garry & Donna Klein

————————————————

Dear Mayor Roach and Members of the Common Council,

We are writing to each of you about the proposed Stipulation of Settlement with The French American School of New York.

We have learned that you will vote on this proposal tonight at the monthly Council meeting. This time frame does not give the public adequate time to review the proposal, as well as prepare remarks although FASNY has had more time to do so.

Each of you was voted into office with the presumption that you would work on behalf of White Plains residents.

By not supporting the residents of the City you are violating your oath of office.

Please allow time for public input by the people who would be most affected by this project and who should be able to review the Stipulation in more than a perfunctory manner.

Residents should be afforded the same courtesy FASNY was clearly afforded.

Midge and Richard Sanchez

_____________________________

Dear Mayor Roach and members of the Common Council-
Once again, we are faced with yet another ridiculous plan by FASNY to undermine the quality of life of the people of this city. Their attempts to shove their plans for the Ridgeway Country Club  site before our city government indicate their complete disregard for the laws of and concerns for the citizens of this city who elected you to serve our best interests and safety. Please vote against any
New plans for their use of the site for their school campus.
Be assured, we the citizens of White Plains and residents of the south end of the city will not stand idly by if Fasny attempts to undermine the quality of our neighborhood because you failed to act in our interest.

Laurie Kimmelstiel

______ 

________________________________________

Dear Mayor Roach and members of the White Plains Common Council,
I am disappointed that once again you are planning to vote on a critical step on this longstanding issue announced at the last minute over a Labor Day Weekend.
This matter is a major step, which seems to your constituents like an agreement that isn’t supported by the facts in the case.
1.There is a high likelihood that the City will prevail in the lawsuit. Why settle now?
2.There is no justification for declaring the parcel they want to build on not environmentally sensitive. In fact, there are indications that they have covered up wetlands on that parcel.
3.There is no justification for agreeing to address and complete voting on their “new proposal” next year. They took a number of years to complete their part of the process on their last proposal, and they still, in my opinion, did not complete the required work to support their plan. The process should proceed at the pace demanded by the required process and the facts, not based on some unsupported agreement before the process has even begun.
At a minimum, this proposal should be tabled tomorrow so that it can be studied thoroughly before you act on it. Fairness to the City and your constituents demands this step.
Albert Dold

________________________________________

To the Mayor and Common Council:

POSTPONE ANY action on the FASNY agenda item. It is the least you can do, as elected officials and representatives of the residents of White Plains, after springing this on the public 
ONE day before the Labor Day weekend.

It is a disgrace for the mayor and his staff to be negotiating all summer behind closed doors with the litigating party and then picking the worst possible time – the Labor Day weekend – to announce it and bring it before the Common Council and the public.

Where is the open government and transparency promised to the residents and voters at election time?

Carry Kyzivat

Posted in Uncategorized

WHY SETTLE?

Hits: 132

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. SEPTEMBER 6, 2016:

Dear Mayor and Common Council,
 
If FASNY wants to drop their lawsuit and submit a another revised development plan. . .FASNY should just do it.
And both can be done at the same time with minimum cost to the City with the legal brief having already being filed with the Appellate Court, where apparently there is already a considerable backlog in hearing cases.
And doing both at the same time forces FASNY to come up with a realistic and workable plan for their property. . .which FASNY has never been able to do for the past 5 years or so.
 
Let’s review why the FASNY review process has dragged on for more than 5 years:
→  FASNY purchased the wrong property for their planned massive development.  Then compounded their own problem by not doing enough due diligence on the old golf course property.  And ever since FASNY has been trying to force feed a massive development into the middle of a residential area where it doesn’t fit with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and neighborhood Character.
→  The City wasn’t responsible for delaying the approval process as FASNY claimed in its lawsuit. . .FASNY never presented a realistic and workable plan for the property.  Each of the multiple plan submissions by FASNY had the common theme of being misleading, inaccurate and incomplete.  Not a good report card on FASNY’s ability to present a good project development plan to the City.
→  For some reason the City Staff appeared to be intimidated and out-maneuvered by the FASNY lawyers every step of the way to the extent that Staff was incapable or uninterested in asking the right questions and thoroughly investigating each of FASNY’s plan submissions.  Not a good report card on the City Staff’s ability or interest in asking the right questions of FASNY. . .or being able to thoroughly evaluate a revised FASNY plan submission.  
→  Your own White Plains residents were left with the task of uncovering the flaws and inadequacies in each of FASNY’s incomplete plan submissions and City Staff inadequate reviews.  On all of the major problem issues in FASNY’s submissions such as massive Traffic, the Closure of Hathaway Lane, the North Street Entrance. 10-year Construction, Water, Environmentally Sensitive Wetlands, Zoning, the Dumping of Pesticides in the Conservancy, etc. and etc. . .
— it was left to residents to clean up FASNY’s and the City Staff’s lack of thorough due diligence.  This work was never the intended responsibility of residents. . .however to protect the City and residents’ own personal property values. . .residents had to step in and try to fix the mess left by FASNY and the City Staff.
The challenge for FASNY or any other future developer of the old golf course property is that it is not 130 acres of contiguous space.  The property consists of 4 separate parcels of land each surrounded by City streets. . .and way back 100 years or so when the original golf course was built it was constructed  by piling on dirt and creating underground streams.
So there are existing Water issues today and more will come up with any planned building foundations. . .and the old golf course’s steep slopes and wetlands also create challenges for any future development.  All of these unique elements were recognized in the City’s Comprehensive Plan which recommended that. . .if the golf course went out of business that residential housing would be the preferred alternative.
We understand that FASNY has apparently now come up with another revised plan.  Please forgive us for having lost count of the number of plan revisions that FASNY has already submitted to the City!  If FASNY’s new plan is one calling for 640 students with changed Traffic patterns. . .this is a significant and material change from FASNY’s last Site Plan submission and the City’s own prior SEQR Findings Approval document.  FASNY should be treated just like any other large developer and be required to restart the SEQR approval process.
Just on the issue of Traffic in White Plains a lot has changed over the past 5 years with normal population growth, the impact of new construction and more vehicles exiting parkways to take shortcuts through our City. . .particularly on Ridgeway and North Street.
And with all the analyses of FASNY Traffic, please stop with all of the PR comparisons with prior FASNY plans which were flawed and were never approved anyway.
Do answer in FASNY’s revised plan the million-dollar question that FASNY and their City Enablers don’t want to hear. How many additional cars and buses, including ins and outs, will FASNY be adding to our current neighborhood Traffic. . .and what other WP streets will this convoy of FASNY vehicles be traveling through to get to their campus?
We’re getting ahead of ourselves critiquing FASNY’s new plan before it has even been submitted. . .however if the FASNY property is 4 separate parcels of land and FASNY is concentrating all its building on Parcel A. . .aren’t there density restrictions on the percentage of how much can be constructed on each parcel of land that residents and developers have to adhere to, particularly in a R1-30 low-density zoned residential area?
It looks to us like FASNY is trying to build the largest ever McMansion type project right in the middle of residential homes!
 
SEQR regulations also specifically require that all future development plans for a property must be disclosed upfront. . .so if FASNY’s new school population is for 640. . .then according to SEQR the school population has to stay at 640 “in perpetuity”.
And also according to SEQR if any possible future land sales are planned. . .this also has to be disclosed upfront.  FASNY can’t come back and try to increase school population before the Construction phase is even competed. . .as FASNY tried to do in some of their recent plans.  It’s the Common Council’s fiduciary responsibility to insure that SEQR regulations are followed to the letter of the law.
We ask the Common Council to ignore the FASNY behind-the-scenes intimidations. . .and to follow SEQR regulations, the City’s Comprehensive Plan and our local laws as written. . .and with this latest significant and material FASNY development plan change. .  . treat FASNY the same as any other large developer. . .and have FASNY once-and-for-all prepare a complete and accurate SEQR submission as required by law.
 
In our opinion the settlement agreement FASNY now wants the City to agree to may actually encourage FASNY to continue to prepare more incomplete and inaccurate plans. . .because with the approval timetables FASNY wants the City to adhere to there is significant danger of another City rushed and inadequate reviewed FASNY plan.
Why put the pressure on the City?  The pressure should be on the developer FASNY.  If the City receives an accurate and well-thought out development plan from FASNY. . .follows normal review procedures. . .completing the review in a timely fashion would not be a problem.
However, the experience to date of all of the FASNY plan submissions is that they have been misleading, inaccurate and incomplete. . . with the added complication that these FASNY lawyers and consultants don’t like to answer direct questions about their development project. . .as other outside developers must do in White Plains.  So it would be a disaster for the City to commit to review-time-tables if the City continues to receive bad plans from FASNY. . .which based on our experience with FASNY is more than likely to happen.
 
The City has to take whatever time it needs to do its due diligence. . .anything less than a timely and thorough review of a project would be a disaster.  How is the City being protected with these review time limits considering FASNY’s history of submitting incomplete and inaccurate plans?
We urge our Common Council not to settle.  And also urge the Common Council to leave the City’s current appeal with the Appellate Court in place. . .it’s the right thing to do to protect the future of White Plains and its citizens.
Thanks for your consideration,
Your Truth Police
Marie and Ron Rhodes
P.S.  We would be remiss in our comments if we didn’t mention the following:
Shame on the FASNY lawyers and consultants who initially didn’t do enough due diligence on the property they themselves bought. . .and then dragged out the City’s approval process by submitting incomplete and misleading plans. . .and shame on those in our City government who behind-the-scenes have tried to help these FASNY lawyers and consultants circumvent the City’s approval process.
And also shame on the City Bureaucrats responsible for the last minute pre-Labor Day notification of a Tuesday, September 6th agenda item for a vote on settling FASNY’s lawsuit.
As long-time residents of White Plains we expect our elected officials to partner and protect citizens with forward thinking as well as innovative and transparent government.
We’re shocked that some of our elected officials, who we voted for, turned into “Benedict Arnolds” and also participated in backroom politics and vindictive last minute document dumps.  We’ll be more informed for the next election.
Posted in Uncategorized