Renovation, New School, Cert Impact Means Avg $400 Sch Tax +

Hits: 0


WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. November 15, 2005: The Board of Education was presented with very early numbers on the cost of bonding for $50 Million to $65 Million in 2007,2008, 2009 to build a new Post Road School and to execute the most needed renovations to district buildings and fields (as recommended in the Building Condition Survey completed recently by KG & D architects).


 


The cost in taxes averages out to an additional $406 in school taxes per year beginning in 2008 for an owner of a $700,000 White Plains home.  


 



The Board also learned that the Business Office recommends bonding for an additional $8 Million in  tax certiorari refunds in June, 2006 to cover expected new certiorari settlements forthcoming according to information from the City of White Plains. The new $8 Million in bonding is addition to the $8 Million the school will bond for in December to cover certiorari refunds in the 2005-2006 school budget year.


 


Assistant Superintendent for Business Terrance Schruers provided work sheets to the Board and the media outlining roughly the cost of the anticipated $65 Million in bonding for the district. He was followed in his presentation by Russell Davis, the architect who outlined the procedure for the State Environmental Quality Review process required by the State Education Department. Davis presented a SEQR review process preliminary timetable, that, if followed would enable the School District to hold a referendum on a $50 Million or $65 Million bond issue in May, the time of the School Budget Vote.


 


Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors cautioned the television audience that these were preliminary figures and that presently the Board was thinking that the district would consider bonding for only a portion of the work recommended, from $50 Million to $65 Million, which would include a new Post Road School, priority renovations to the 7 school district buildings, and field renovations. He assured the audience that prior to making any decisions on buildings that the parents and administrators of the schools would be consulted.


 


Rough Debt Schedule Issued.


 


Schruers debt schedule reported that the school district would increase its total debt from the $35 Million in debt it presently carries to $100 Million if it were to bond for the $65 Million figure.


 


The present school tax rate is $410.45 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. This means that a $700,000 single family home (currently assessed according to the city Assessor’s Office at $18,475) in White Plains pays $7,583 in school taxes (18.475  $410.45).


 


To put this into perspective for you, the median price of the 68 single family homes on the market today in White Plains is $799,000, according to White Plains realtors, Nelson-Vrooman Associates. The least expensive single family home on the market today in the city is  $340,000, which would mean that homeowner would pay approximately $3,700 in school taxes


 


Certs Take First Bite.


 


According to Mr. Schreurs bonding schedule, the twin certiorari bonds would hit district taxpayers first at the end of 2006- 2007, increasing the tax rate $6.88 from the certioraris alone to $417.33 per $1,000.  Add to this the average $8 tax rate increase to cover the projected school budget increases in addition to the certiorari bonds, and the tax rate would move to $425.33 per $1,000. This $425.33 would increase that $700,000 priced homeowner’s  taxes due to the certiorari bonds bond  $392 to $7,975, a $392 tax increase in 06-07..


 


The $65 Million in bonds will be bonded in increments of $21.5M, $22M, and 21.5M at 5% in June 2007, June 2008, and June 2009, with the first payments coming in 2007-2008


 


How would the $65 Million bonding affect our $700,000 homeowner’s taxes?


 


In 2008, the tax rate over 2005  for the cert bonds and the $65 Million bond would increase the tax rate $10.12. Add to this the average $8 tax rate increase to cover the budget increases, and the tax rate goes up an additional $8, bringing it to $428.57 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. Provided the assessment stays the same, our $700,000 homeowner will pay a school tax of $8,036 ( an additional $452 per year in 08-09.)


 


In 2008-2009, the tax rate increase slows on paying off the $65 Million in bonds because the certiorari bonds payments decrease. Our $700,000 homeowner pays only an additional $4.76 per $1,000 of assessed valuation (less than the cost of a Starbucks Caramel Machiatto Vente Size cup of coffee) in 2009, plus the average $8 more to cover the compounding school budget, giving us a projected tax rate of $423.21 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. This figure gives our $700,000 homeowner a school tax of $7,935 a year (an increase of $392 over 2005-2006).


 


Mr. Schreurs last projection shows the school tax payer receiving more relief in the tax rate in 2009-2010, when the projected tax rate increase dips to $4.65 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. You add that $4.65 to the $410.45 and the $8 average tax rate increase for the general school budget compounding and you come up with a $423 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. Given the 18.475 assessed value and multiplying it by $423 gives you a total school tax of $7,931, or $388 more per year in school taxes by 2009-2010.


 


Assumptions.


 


Now these calculations are straight line and assume the assessment of the $700,000 home stays the same. If it is increased by the city, of course the approximate tax increase per year on the  $16 Million in Certs, and $65 Million in renovation bonds, would increase, as it would increase given more than expected increases in other school budget items. The tax rate increased $9.61 budget to budget from 2004-2005 to 2005-2006, and the School Business Office told WPCNR that an $8 average was a legitimate figure to use for this calculation of the average increase in the tax rate going forward, separate from the increase in the tax rate directly related to the paying off of the bond issues. Projections were not carried beyond 2010.


 


The $50 Million Bond.


 


Should the School District decide to bond for the lessor amount, $50  Million, the increase in taxes on the $700,000 home are less:  $432 in 07-08, $332 in 08-09, and $330 in 09-10.


 


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Board Raises Regents PASS Grade to 65 for 07 Local Diploma. OKS Display Policy

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. November 14, 2005; Correction November 21, 2005: The Board of Education accelerated local diploma standards for Class of 2007 students at White Plains High School last night, voting 5-2 (with Peter Bassano and Rick Tompkins against) to raise the requirements for 2007 would be candidates for a WPHS high school diploma. Beginning in 2007, students would be required to pass 2 of the 5 Regents Examinations (American History, World History, English, Math, Chemistry, and Physics)  with a grade of 65 in order to graduate WPHS. This requirement will apply beginning with this year’s Junior Class (Class of 2007). It will not apply to the Class of 2006.


In future years, the Class of 2008 would continue to have to pass 2 Regents exams with a grade of 65 or better to receive a local diploma. The Class of 2009, 3 Regents Exams; the Class of 2010, 4 Exams, and the Class of 2011 would have to pass all five Regents Exams with a 65 or better, thereby assuring all students graduating with a diploma from WPHS would be graduating with Regents Diplomas.


The Board ruling places White Plains ahead of the proposed State Education Department timetable which would require all New York State Students to pass all 5 Regents Exams with a 65 to receive a Regents Diploma by 2012. Henry Cafaro, Director of Guidance has informed the board that he knows of no school districts other than White Plains which are accelerating the passing grade process ahead of the state schedule.


Members of the Board of Education went to great lengths at Monday evening’s meeting, with Peter Bassano, Donna McLaughlin, Bill Pollack and Marie Tratoros emphasizing that by demanding more of White Plains High students, the district is preparing them better for life after high school. 


Mr. Bassano wrote to correct a WPCNR error in reporting the Board Vote: I  just read the story about Monday’s meeting and wanted to correct something rather serious.  The vote approving the Holiday Display policy was unanimous.  The vote for the Regent’s passing grade was 5 to 2.   I voted against the proposed policy because I believe we do our students a disservice by handing them a diploma even though they get a 55 on three regents exams and we then do not compel them to retake the class and master the material. John, I would appreciate if you would publish a clarification on this.  This vote and the policy we adopted is one of the more important decisions we will have made this year.

Holiday Display Policy Approved, 7-0


Despite 6 of 7 parents addressing the Board urging they not pass the Holiday Display Policy, with three of the parents sharply criticising the Board’s efforts at publicizing the policy to the community, Parents spoke out on the issue during the Public Comment period, complaining bitterly that the policy would introduce religion into the public sector. The number of commentators was a record for the number of public commentators at a school board meeting since WPCNR has been covering the Board of Education (2000).


Here is the text of the new school district holiday display policy:


Displays


 


The Board of Education of the White Plains City School District is proud of the diversity of White Plains and believes that the District has the responsibility as an educational institution to foster mutual understanding and respect in our students for the many beliefs and customs stemming from the varied religious, racial, ethnic and cultural backgrounds of the members of our community.


 


With this goal in mind, the Board of Education will allow the District to acknowledge the cultural and historical aspects of religious holidays and to temporarily display secular and religious symbols in the school buildings to celebrate the diversity of the holiday seasons.


 


All holiday displays containing religious symbols must be non-proselytizing in nature and shall conform to the following requirements:


 



  • The display of religious symbols (in a display) must be part of a larger configuration in an education setting which includes secular symbols and is representative of the diversity of the holiday season;
  • The display of religious symbols must contain written statements supplied by the District explaining the symbol and its significance to cultural and historical aspects of the religious holidays presented in an unbiased and objective manner;
  • The display of religious symbols must be temporary and limited to the duration of the holiday season; and
  • The display of religious symbols must be accompanied by a written disclaimer of public sponsorship indicating that,
“This temporary display of secular and religious symbols is intended by the District to celebrate the diversity of the holiday season and should not be construed as an endorsement of any religion.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Kenny: Bill Favorable to Phone Companies Threatens Funding of Public Access TV

Hits: 0

WPCNR MR. & MRS. & MS. WHITE PLAINS VOICE . By James Kenny, Executive Director White Plains Access TV. November 14, 2005:  The head of White Plains Public Access Television draws citizens’ attention to a threat to cable television as we know it in a letter to WPCNR:


Dear White Plains Public Access Producers and Viewers:


Legislation has been proposed in Congress that is detrimental to the funding of public access and removes control of rights-of-way (wiring the city for cable) from the local government. Access in White Plains has been a model for the rest of Westchester County. We need to maintain local control of the franchising process and the ability to offer local programming whether through the cable system or a new system being built by Verizon.


(More)


The time to take action is now. We need your help as producers and citizens. Please help by contacting our representatives in Washington to tell them that access TV is important to this community and that control of our rights-of-way should not be legislated away to bureaucrats in Albany or Washington.


Attached is a sample letter which you can use as a starting point. Contact information for our senators and congresswoman is listed below. Thank you in advance for any assistance you can offer at this critical time.


Sincerely James Kenny


Executive Director White Plains Access TV


SAMPLE LETER TO SEND TO CONGRESS


Dear Representative:


Please oppose the Internet Protocol and Broadband Services legislation on which the House Telecommunications Subcommittee is holding hearings starting November 9. And please contact Representatives Upon, Barton and other House leaders to let them know your concerns and opposition. Please do so promptly, as otherwise the bill will be reported out of Committee around Thanksgiving in a rush to judgment before it can be modified to be fair to all municipalities and the public.


This legislation started off as a bipartisan effort to fast track phone company entry into the cable business with all parties at the table — telephone, cable, municipal and consumer groups — with the goal of crating fair competition in cable to benefit consumers. The goals of the process and dialogue were simple.


Phone companies would receive a fast track franchise process, but not be granted franchises on preferable terms or conditions than their cable competitors. Consumers would receive a choice of broadband providers with a guarantee of net neutrality. State and local governments would maintain rights-of-way management control and be kept whole in terms of social obligations and fees they receive from cable and phone companies. All groups provided input on Commerce Committee staff’s initial draft of a bill, released in September.


The new staff draft, released November 3, is a giant step backward: It is no longer bipartisan.


Only the phone companies win. Consumers lose because the phone companies no longer have to provide phone or cable service to all residents, the way phone companies and cable companies do now.


Competition loses because the bill allows phone and cable companies to buy out their competitors (the prior draft banned this). The bill is pro-monopoly, not pro-competition.


Municipalities lose because they are not kept whole financially, as leadership promised. And the bill does this even though under it, construction in the rights of way will increase dramatically, as the phone companies tear up the streets nationwide to build their new networks, increasing municipal costs.


The bill harms municipalities financially in three major ways. First, it cuts cable type franchise fees by around 10% by excluding “non-subscriber” revenues from franchise fee calculations.


Second, it limites the fees traditionally paid by phone companies to use the rights of way — such as Metro Act fees in Michigan and franchise and per access line fees paid in Texas and other states — to costs. This may cost local governments tens or hundreds of millions of dollars per year in rent for use of their streets.


Third, the bill eliminates the grants and in kind support for cable channels used by local governments, schools, and the public. Currently such grants are a user fee, paid by cable subscribers to support programming on these channels, just as subscribers fund the programming provided on all other channels.


Under the bill the funding for such channels is supposed to come from general municipal revenues, which is unfair to residents with satellite dishes or otherwise without cable, who now must support a service they cannot get.


Finally the bill Federalizes musch local control over streets and highways, with lists of what municipalities can and cannot do. This is an affront to states and municipalities across the country. And it misses a major point:


Stereets are there in the first instance for vehicles. Internet commerce for ordering goods on line is not worth much if the streets are so poor the goods break enroute, or don’t arrive on time. This can only be managed locally, not by the Federal Government.


Municipalities support competition in cable and telephone service. The initial process on this bill was a bipartisan effort to provide fast track franchising with the critical interests of all parties protected. The current draft serves only phone company interests.


For these reasons, please oppose the Internet Protocol and Broadband Services legislation and let the House leadership know of your opposition.


Sincerely


 


FAX NUMBERS of Legislators to Fax this letter to:


The Honorable Joe Barton     Fax 202-225-3052


Senator Chuck Schumer        Fax 202-228-3027


Senator Hillary Clinton           Fax 202-228-0282


Congresswoman Nita Lowey Fax 202-225-0546


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Board of Education Takes Up Bonding for District Wide Building Improvements Mond

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. NOVEMBER 13, 2005: At Education House Monday evening, the City of White Plains Board of Education will be presented with bonding alternatives and incremental spending plans to execute the state-suggested improvements to its elementary, middle and high schools Monday evening. The total expenditure its architects have estimated to bring the schools into physical compliance with the state standards is $95 Million, $45 to $50 Million of which is compliance related. Details of costs and “pick and choose” options are reported to be presented to the Board.


The district will also take up the issue of moving the passing grade on Regents examinations to 65 on a graduated basis, for awarding of a Regents high school diploma. The Board was leaning towards a proposal that would require graduating students to have to have 2 Regents examinations (of 5) passed with grades of 65 in the 07 year, increasing to three exams by 08, 4 in 2009, to all 5 by 2010, ahead of the State schedule for when Regents passing grades would move to 65. The 65, it should be noted is based on the Regents grading curve in the math exams, which translates to as low as  27 correct points out of 84, which last year translated to a 55 passing grade.


In the final matter of interest, the Board will vote on a district wide holiday decorations policy.

Posted in Uncategorized

County Senior Housing Project on Post Office Parking Lot to cost $55 Million —

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE HOUSING NEWS. By John F. Bailey. November 11, 2005: According to Donna Greene, Assistant Director of Communications for Westchester County, the senior housing project proposed for the corner of Quarropas and Court Streets is expected to cost $55 Million.



SITE OF COUNTY’S PROPOSED $55 Million SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT: Quarropas & Court Streets. County Office Building is in the background. Photo by WPCNR News.


The 200-unit project, introduced last week by County Executive Andy Spano and  Chairman of the Board of County Legislators William Ryan will be built by The Bluestone Organization, managed by Hanac, a non-profit agency based in New York, and partially funded in some manner by Enterprise  Social Investment Corp. It has been designed by SLCE Architects of New York, designers of the Hudson Park project on the Yonkers waterfront, (with Collins Brothers the developer).



The Affordable Housing Building Design. Photo, Courtesy Westchester County Department of Communications.


Ms. Greene told WPCNR the financial package has not been put together yet.


 Ms. Greene was able to provide these details  from the County Department of Planning on how the county was going to fund this project:


“The County Planning Department told me, it is our understanding that the development team will look to access a variety of financing resources, including Low-Income Housing Tax Credits.


To our knowledge, a final financing package is not yet in place as it is very early still in the process. Once the financing package is put together, then the development team will have a much better idea of the equity needed to make the development viable.


The actual ownership entity of the project typically includes a partnership set up to own and operate the building. HANAC, as the nonprofit sponsoring the project, will be involved as a general partner and will bring its expertise in owning and managing elderly housing projects to this development.”


Mr. Spano and Mr. Ryan, when they announced the selection of the county partners in the project, said the county would be selling the land to the group for $1 Million, (though it is valued at $10 Million). When you add the discount on the land price, the cost of the development goes to $64 Million or $320,000 per unit, approaching the selling price of condominium apartments now available to buy in White Plains, and approaching the costs to build commercial apartment and condominium projects recently completed in White Plains.


The project will make 120 of the 200 units available to senior households earning no more than 50 or 60% of the county’s median income. The remaining 80 units will be for households earning up to 80% of the median income. The Department of Housing and Urban Development reports, a single person can earn up to $32,700 at 50% of median income; $39,250 at 60% and $52,300 at 80% (of median income).


The Senior Project is expected to come before the White Plains Common Council in the near future, which has sole discretion as to whether to approve the project.


The site plan:



Photo, Courtesy, Westchester County Department of Communications.




Posted in Uncategorized

Assemblyman Latimer Deplores Dismissal of Amtrak President

Hits: 0

WPCNR’S LATIMER OF THE LEGISLATURE. By Assemblyman George Latimer, 91st A.D. November 10, 2005: The report of the firing of David Gunn, President of Amtrak, the national rail passenger system, has prompted this reaction from area Assemblyman George Latimer, who released this statement this morning:



The AMTRAK ACELA Service, picks up speed departing Providence, Rhode Island for Boston. The train is today’s successor to legendary luxury expresses like The New England Limited, The Merchants’ Limited and The Bay States Limited. Photo, WPCNR News.


I am deeply saddened by the political decision to dismiss Amtrak President David Gunn. I consider it a foolish and ideologically-driven act, which will hurt our progress toward improved passenger rail in this country.
(More)





The Bush Administration and the Republicans in Congress, with their
political base in the South and Southwest sections of the country, do
not truly appreciate the value of high-speed rail, and mass transit in
general. This country benefits by investing in our infrastructure, and
in this case, our passenger rail system. We are penny-wise and
pound-foolish to talk of splitting off the Northeast Corridor of Amtrak
from the rest of the nation; to plan to make deep cuts to our rail
system; to abandon advancements in technology that could give America a
21st Century rail system, rather than a 19th Centrury one.

Places like New York City and Chicago have booming economies and vibrant
downtowns in part because we move people from suburbs to city, and
around the city, with effective mass transit. Places like Houston have
choking traffic
with downtowns dark-at-night in part due to a lack of such transit.
Intercity rail can reduce our fuel use and dependency on foreign oil;
help reduce air pollution; move people from point to point in all
weather conditions; and on and on.

David Gunn – who was a success in managing Boston, New York City and
other major urban subway systems – understood the potential of passenger
rail in our future. His crime was to speak out forcefully, as an
advocate for these ideas, and he has paid for that advocacy with his
job. He will go on to new assignments and new accomplishments.

Our nation, on the other hand, if we continue to deconstruct our rail
system, will regret these short-sighted policies for the rest of our
lives.


George Latimer
New York State Assemblyman, 91st A.D.
Wednesday, November 9, 2005

Posted in Uncategorized

Who Put the Bump in the Bumpity-Bump at City Center Garage

Hits: 0

WPCNR BUMPER-TO-BUMPER REPORT  From a White Plains CitizeNetReporter. November 10, 2005:  I would like to meet the person whose brilliant idea it was to install the new speed bumps in the City Center garage. Welcome to another huge  planning blunder on the part of the city in an already very congested  garage.


Slowing the flow of cars leaving the garage, while not slowing the entrance near Coughlin’s that partiers like to cruise in through.  Genius.

As it is, driving out of this garage definitely is a nightmare- especially on weekends.  (And if you’ve ever tried to exit it during a parade, forget it.  You could be trapped in your car for a half hour, as many of the exits are ridiculously blocked off.)  The only saving grace to  counter the zig-zagging on the bottom floor and myriad of one-way entrances was always the fact that the flow of outgoing cars is steady.

Now, we have speed bumps. Right on the verge of holiday traffic. Right near the Main Street exit of the garage.

If you think driving out of the City Center garage is a pain on weekends now, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

Next time you’re at the bookstore, buy some CD Audio books. You’ll need  them to entertain you on the drive out this December.

Posted in Uncategorized

Official Results From Board of Elections in Mayor’s Race

Hits: 0

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2005. From Board of Elections, Westchester County. November 9, 2005: Within the last hour the Board of Elections has posted the official results for the White Plains city races. They may be accessed at http://www.westchestergov.com/electiontally/link24.html.


Mayor Delfino shows him taking the Mayoralty with 58% of the vote to Dennis Power’s 42% winning by 2,002 votes, 7,236 to 5,214 with 12,450 votes, estimated by the Board of Elections to be a 42% turnout.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

The Champ Retains Title. America’s Favorite Mayor, Joseph Delfino Wins 3rd Term

Hits: 0

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2005. By John F. Bailey. November 8, 2005 UPDATED WITH MAYOR INTERVIEW: The City of White Plains gave Mayor Joseph Delfino a resounding “Well Done” this Election Day by electing White Plains favorite son to another four year term  with 58% of the vote giving him a clear cut mandate to continue his Revitalization Plan for White Plains. Unofficially, only 41% of White Plains registered voters cast ballots at the polls.


The Associated Press reports that statewide New Yorkers defeated Proposition One that would have allowed the legislature to craft the state budget, but voters approved the $2.9 Billion Transportation Bond Issue. White Plains Bill Ryan has won another term as County Legislator for the White Plains-Scarsdale District 5. Andy Spano has won a third term as County Executive and Janet DiFiore has won the office of Westchester County District Attorney.



Mayor Joseph Delfino claims victory last night. Photo by WPCNR News.


With all 43 Election Districts reporting by cellphone to Republican Headquarters at the Crowne Plaza Hotel, Mayor Delfino is reporting receiving 7,207 votes to Dennis Power’s 5,260, a margin of 58% to 42%, which the Mayor maintained from first District to last.


In the Council races, Rita Malmud and Tom Roach, Democrats outpolled the Mayor, Malmud receiving 7,432 votes and Roach, 7,365. Malmud wins her fifth term on the council, and Roach his second. Glen Hockley won the third Council Seat with 6,447 votes, outdistancing Larry Delgado (5,440 votes) by 1,007 votes.  John Carlson polled 3,494 votes and Frank Mastraccio, 3,440.


Mayor Calls It “His greatest victory.”


In an  interview with WPCNR, Mayor Delfino said it was his greatest victory: “I feel tremendous, this was an unusual campaign. I managed this campaign with a sense of its future. We were positive through this entire campaign.There was no reason to be negative, because this city doesn’t need negativism.


        “There’s no doom and gloom in this city. This city is in excellent condition. And we’re going to make it better. Can you build a perfect city in six years? No. Are there issues we must handle? Yes.  That’s what our next four years is about: management of the smart growth that we’ve accomplished in this city which is recognized nationally and internationally. We have been a model for this country. The awards we have won. The response we ‘ve received from Europe, asking how did you do this?”


       “The people of White Plains believed in this growth accepted this growth and gave me this great honor to be Mayor for four more years.”


Asked what was next on the radar, Mayor Delfino said, “Next on the radar we have two projects approved, we have three that are being approved. We’re a walkable city but we’re going to put our trolley system in the city on rubber wheels, obviously we’re not going to put them on rail. We’re going to expand out to South Lexington Avenue, complete that area, and more important, the issues that come with smart growth that have occurred in this city, we’re going to manage those and resolve the issues that seem to be put before us and we’re going to make it a better place. That’s our object for the next four years.”


Unofficially, approximately 12,447 of 29,882 White Plains registered voters (as of October 19), voted in this citywide election. This means 41.7% of registered voters in White Plains cast ballots in the city election. 


 



The Mayor said a sensitive goodbye to Larry Delgado, crediting Mr. Delgado with being with him in the early years of his first eight years as mayor and supporting him in those early years and during the tough times in this campaign. Mr. Delgado, said he looked back with thanks for the time on the Council, and said “White Plains is in good hands with Mayor Delfino at the helm,” saying “the best is yet to be, and you haven’t seen anything yet.” Photo by WPCNR News



Unsuccessful Republican Council Candidates Applaud the Mayor. Left to right, John Carlson, Francesco Mastracchio and Larry Delgado. Photo by WPCNR News.


John Carlson in a statement said, ” The citizens of White Plains have spoken. I wish Mayor Delfino and the successful Common Council candidates Rita Malmud, Tom Roach and Glen Hockley  Godspeed.


White Plains is truly the “capital” of Westchester County — the residential, cultural, intellectual, governmental and business capital. But the problems still need to be solved so that our quality of life is preserved — the declining commercial assessments, the rise in violent crime, Moody’s Negative Outlook.


I thank those who supported me. Indeed, I am grateful for your support. Let’s now look ahead. There are some bumps in the road — the succesful candidates will need your prayers and support. Myself? I will reamin active as a citizen, working to make White Plains the best it can be.”


Franceso Mastraccio said he was “not a quitter,” and would be back to run again.


Bill Ryan and Andy Spano are back!


In the County Legislature race for White Plains-Scarsdale District 5, Chairman of the County Board of Legislators, Democrat  William Ryan defeated  Cass Cibelli 6,204 votes to 2,398, a 72% to 24% spread.


In the County Executive contest, Democrat Andy Spano won reelection, defeating Rob Astorino. Janet DiFiore was elected District Attorney, and Timothy Idoni was elected County Clerk.  For complete results on the County level, go to www.westchestergov.com.


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Delfino Drives Hard to the Finish. Power Lies Low.

Hits: 0

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2005. News Commentary By John F. Bailey. November 8, 2005, UPDATED 11 A.M. E.S.T. UPDATED 11:51 A.M. E.S.T.: It is Election Day and the campaign for Mayor and Council is over. White Plainsians are heading to the polls opening at 6 A.M., and have until 9 P.M. tonight to vote and decide whether the Delfino Administration is to be extended for another four years, or to vote in Dennis Power, former Councilman, who has campaigned hard the last two weeks.


The weekend was punctuated by telephone calling and two Mayoral events, and the mailing of two brochures by the Mayor in a one-two punch. In the “Splat” brochure, he accused Mr. Power of distorting the facts, flinging mud, and saying the city’s finances are in great shape and that his opponents have nothing to say. The “Splat” brochure is a tecnique used with effect in November of 2001 and I believe November of 1997.


The Mayor followed that up Saturday with the “Together Brochure,” claiming among other things, he was bringing a 4-Star Hotel and 5-Star restaurant, a rubber-wheel trolley system, and a makeover of the West Side in his Phase IV renovation plan (which WPCNR was told a few weeks ago, the city has “no plan for.”)


The Mayor announced and held a Get Out the Vote Rally on Sunday, an unprecedented event in this reporter’s experience. The Mayor took the opportunity to ask his supporters to call friends and urge them to vote. Whether this means the Republicans lack volunteers to get Delfinoistas out to the polls, if they think they need them, remains to be seen.


But the Mayor was everywhere the last week — at the Youth Bureau celebration, at the Westco Gala. He is the consummate American politician in every sense of the word.



The Mayor’s Get Out the Vote Rally Sunday in Delfino Park. Photo by WPCNR News.


 


Then the Mayor pulled out the stops at the Common Council Meeting Monday evening in a brilliant heartwarming Common Council meeting. He staged a Rosa Parks event, inviting members of the African-American community to speak and an acquaintance of Rosa Parks to speak. He recognized a popular young man from Archbishop Stepinac High School whom WPCNR knows from Little League, Patrick Massaroni as Youth of the Month. He recognized a black woman, Dionne Lewin, Section 8 Administrator working for the city who did much for Hurricane Katrina victims in Houston.  


He chose the occasion to celebrate the Finance Department getting an award for financial presentation yet again from the Government Financial Officer’s Association, cleverly orchestrated to indicate that the city’s financial reporting is beyond reproach. Most persons seeing this award do not realize the award is simply for looks, and presentation, not content comprehensiveness. If the budget were comprehensive we would have nothing to write about!


On the consent agenda, the Mayor  had Rita Malmud and Tom Roach and Larry Delgado speak on various matters, doing “Star Turns” on the touchy-feely issues of the city and schools joint facilities agreement, and Mr. Delgado talking about affordable housing and a grant of funds to rehabilitate housing in the city. All demonstrated on television for the voters their hearts were in the right place and were wonderful people.


The Mayor touched all the bases. Will he reach home plate? Was he piling up insurance runs, or pulling it out?


Dennis Power did not finish his punches.


Power meanwhile sent out a powerful letter from former Superintendent of Schools Saul Yanofsky, taking the Delfino Administration to task for ignoring the plight of the school district and failing to achieve the growth he claims has come about from the downtown development. A final press conference by Power last Thursday repeated his theme that the city finances were in poor shape, and that citizens needed to be involved in planning future growth and future development of the city, and that he would do that.


 Power sent out no other mailings to counter the Delfino drive to the finish. Power also made no appearances that we know of since last Thursday. Is he laying low because he has the lead, or is it considered that the election is lost? Or do they want him to lose. Come on, you got to finish! Be a boxer!


Wife’s Illness blunts Power’s Last Weekend.


WPCNR has learned that Mr. Power’s wife was taken ill over the weekend, forcing him not to campaign as vigorously as planned, according to a source with the campaign. However, this puts Mr. Powers’ Council running mates further to shame for “not taking up the slack” and carrying the good fight to the Mayor, perhaps even playing up the illness as a campaign issue for the sympathy factor. A slogan comes to mind: “Residents and Family Come First,” or perhaps: “White Plains: It’s All About Family.” But then I am a cynical person.


Power is to be commended for the media-grabbing Del Vecchio-Schulman endorsements and the Yanofsky  letter.


Andy Reaches Out and Touches You, but Does Not Plug Power


Meanwhile Andy Spano, County Executive Incumbent, continued to reach out and touch all voters, as did Hillary Clinton, and Bill Clinton, urging us to vote for Mr. Spano, pass a bond issue, and what have you.


What was really glaringly missing from Mr. Spano’s telephone messages, or any Democratic message was any support for Mr. Power and the other Democratic Candidates in White Plains.


It’s easy to do that. The County Executive just cuts different recordings to feed to different communities. Why didn’t he do that? It goes along with WPCNR’s theory that no Democratic incumbent really wants Mr. Power to win this thing because it would upset the preordained line of succession.


More to the point, don’t you think Adam Bradley could have cut a telephone message for Mr. Power? After all Mr. Bradley is the man pulling the strings on the City Democratic Committee (Tim James  and Liz Schollenberger,  worked with him in his former campaign in Bradley’s Naomi Matusow ouster in 2002). (Jonathan Appel and Arnold Bernstein were Bradley’s Campaign Managers) Don’t you think Mr. Bradley could have helped Mr. Power just a little? A wince? Didn’t Adam want him to win?


And how about, Bill Ryan or Hillary or Bill Clinton telephone messages? Why didn’t they do something for Dennis on the phone. At the very least Mr. Power could have been in some of Andy’s TV Spots…no harm.


And how about  Bill Clinton making an appearance with Mr. Power in White Plains. That would have gotten a few votes.


With Running Mates Like these, no one could win.


Why didn’t several of Mr. Power’s running mates and Democratic personalities campaign for him? Mr. Boykin, Ms. Malmud, Mr. Roach, Mr. Bernstein and Mr. Hockley never made any passionate speeches for Mr. Power. He was treated as if he was an invisible man by his running mates. The Democratic councilpersons were not good actors in this political drama. They went through the motions, very few motions, as a matter of fact.


Why did not those kind of credibility boosting appearances by the Clintons, and who knows who else, happen?


To be sure, Mr. Power is not the only candidate neglected by his running mates. John Carlson, the Republican Councilman was kept off the mike at the Mayor’s Get Out the Vote Rally Sunday, working the crowd. Admittedly, Carlson has been criticising the Mayor’s financial policies. Then today when Mayor Delfino’s telephone message went out to residents, he said to get out and vote for Larry Delgado and Franceso Marinaccio, but did not mention Mr. Carlson. What a gaffe!


U.S. Attorney’s Office, are you listening? Perhaps if Janet DiFiore wins D.A. she can institute an election fraud investigation, or maybe Tony Castro, should he win. Fraud, what fraud? The 2005 White Plains election reeks.


However, if Mr. Power wins today. This tears up the pea patch. Remember the Democrats were going to simply not run anyone against Mr. Delfino until Ron Jackson asked to run. Then BOOM! Dennis Power leaps to the barricades. Power did not campaign for three months, finally getting started in early September.


 But, he has not beat up the Mayor on three big time issues.


Crime — Power refused to light up the Mayor on the Galleria Murder. He refused to pound the Mayor on the changing nature of the downtown at night, particulary the increase in assaults — instead he attacked traffic which he blamed on development.


7 Coverups — Power attacked the Mayor on not responding to phone calls, but refused to ream the Mayor on the coverups:


1. The sewer coverup of 2001.


2. The Silver Lake sewage spill coverup of 2005.


3.  The witholding the Moody’s bond rating coverup of 2004,


4.  The failure of the Mayor to meet the Budget and Management Committee for nine months last year Cover Up  of 2004, when the city was facing tough financial decisions.


5. The coverup of financial figures on sales tax progress in 2005.


6.  The coverup of the Performing Arts Center Fix in 2003. 


7.  The last coverup: the 2003 $27,245,000 Municipal Bond floated for LC White Plains by the County IDA which was never publicized. Coverups always play well.


Performing Arts Center Fiasco — How much is this theatre operation making anyway? Why is it nobody buys tickets and the tickets have to be given away or sold at half-price? How much is the city spending on it? Man, this is ripe for cherrypicking. Adam Bradley could have sliced and diced the Mayor on this issue alone.


 At this point you wonder what might have been had Mr. Power ran harder to win, and not tried so hard to be a nice guy.


Of course if Mr. Power wins, then it was a brilliant, lowkey, strategic campaign, taking the high road all the way against an entrenched incumbent with a quartermillion to spend, and he ran it without, as I have pointed out, any help from the Spano war chest, not much any way. Bad job by the Democrats all the way around.


In politics you have to be able to do anything to win. It is like football. You have to out-tough the other team. Delfino knows how to do that.


 

Posted in Uncategorized