WHITE PLAINS CITIZENETREPORTER SETS RECORD VISITS FOR YEAR 7,017,658 VISITS! 2,098,003 VISITORS MADE 6 VISITS A DAY EVERY DAY. 63,330 UNIQUE VISITORS MADE 133,730 VISITS IN DECEMBER. WPCNR AVERAGED 17,284 VISITORS A WEEK, VISITING 31,270 TIMES.

Hits: 0

WPCNR East Side Story. By John F. Bailey. September 21, 2006 UPDATED 2:00 P.M. E.D.T. INTERVIEWS WITH PAUL WOOD, TIM CONNORS: As first reported in January, 2005 by WPCNR, the New York Presbyterian Hospital Proton Accelerator/Biotech Research laboratory will not be built. At least not for a long time, according to Paul Wood, City Executive Officer. Reports appearing in the media of 131 homes to be built on the property, he said, were inaccurate.

PAUL WOOD. The Mayor’s Executive Officer. Mr. Wood is shown last night at City Hall. Photo, WPCNR News

The New York Presbyterian Hospital was reported in another publication, to be considering building housing instead consisting of over 100 homes, with more to come, according to Paul Wood of the Mayor’s office yesterday. However, at 12:15 today, Mr. Wood said this information, provided to other media but not to WPCNR,  was “inaccurate.” 

Timothy Connors, Superintendent of Schools, said he could not comment on the effect of any possible massive home development until he knew what it was, townhouses, condos, two-family homes. Commenting on how a new burst of housing could affect the district $69.6 Million Capital Improvemehnt project,  “It shows,” Connors said, “The School District is on the right track, preparing for the future.” 

 

Wood told WPCNR the city is applying to subdivide the hospital property to create a 5.5 acre park, where one soccer field and one baseball diamond could be built. Wood said he has no idea of what the New York Presbyterian Hospital would use the remainder of the property for, including the Northern side of the property.

 He said the balance of the hospital property would revert back to its original zoning which would consist of 2 houses per acre. In order to “carve out” a small park for the city, the city had to apply for a subdivision, which in exchange, the hospital was willing to allow the balance of the property to revert back to its original zoning which is residential.  Wood said he did not know whether the hospital was thinking of selling the land, developing it, or what they planned to do with it.

Pardes Felt the City Should Have a Park.

Subdivision virtually Delays Proton Accelerator Indefinitely

Asked why the hospital was doing this, Wood told WPCNR the Mayor and Herbert Pardes, CEO of the New York Presbyterian Hospital, have a special relationship, and Mr. Pardes told the Mayor he (Pardes) felt badly the city was not going to get a park out of the proton accelerator project, and for “over a year,” Wood said, he and the Mayor worked out the vest-pocket playing fields park announced to media yesterday.

Wood said by subdividing the property for the park, the original approval for the proton-accelerator “becomes moot,” and in order for the proton accelerator to be built, the New York Presbyterian Hospital would have to resubmit an entire new application process.

Wood stressed the Common Council has to approve the subdivision, but did acknowledge the Council had been briefed on the park project and, asked if they were behind it, Wood said he did not know.

Potential for Housing Always There.

School District Should Have Known that: Wood.

 The potential for  housing that could be built on the property, had always existed Wood told us, and therefore the school district should have been aware of that potential. (Although previous approval of the proton accelerator-biotech project may have, in all fairness, dimmed the interest in building homes adjacent to the proton accelerator complex.)

Should the subdivision be approved, the potential for a total of 131 houses on a proton-acclerator-less property, could add as few as 131 children and as many as 500 children to the school district enrollments in the next seven years, by rough estimate.

11 Home Tradeoff?

Wood said the city had to articulate the subdivison allowing the New York Presbyterian Hospital the ability to build 11 homes in addition to the on the rest of their property, to make up for the homes lost on the 5.5 acres — a very building friendly site on the Southwest portion of the property. At roughly two homes per 60 acres, this would give a 120 home potential plus 11 from the park site to make a total of 131.

Wood did not say why the hospital needed an 11-home trade to do the subdivision rather than a straight $6 Million city payment for the park (based on a sales price of $1.2 Million per acre set by the NorthStreet Community purchase of the St.Agnes property), if they were not considering building homes on the property. Other media reported the housing project would include the 11 homes to the 120 homes (2 per acre). Wood calls this inforamtion innaccurate and has no knowledge housing is in the Hospital plans for the future. 

As Reported Previously by WPCNR

The city did not advise the School District that this previously reported park/housing project on behalf of the city, was in the planning stages for the last year, according to Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors. Wood said he saw no reason to tell the School District about it because they should have been aware of the housing potential on the Hospital property, anyway. 

Common Council President Rita Malmud said the Council and she were aware of “certain elements of the plan” in its development that had been explained to her by the Mayor and city staff. WPCNR asked Ms. Malmud if the council (which has often commented the city should work more closely with the school system), had shared the proposal with the school district, said the council, to her knowledge, had not.

Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors told WPCNR this morning the city administration had not let him know that this housing project as originally reported by other media, was being planned, and the project impact on school enrollments was not taken into account in District enrollment projections used to formulate District infrastructure and school expansion as part of the $69.6 Million Capital Project. Mr. Connors is seen promoting passage of the Capital Project Referendum at Post Road School last week. Photo, WPCNR News

 The clarification issued by Mr. Wood to WPCNR of his remarks to media yesterday which were not furnished to WPCNR, does not indicate there would be massive housing on Bryant Avenue.

If the hospital should go for a housing project which now arguably becomes more attractive if the proton accelerator is off the table, it shatters City School District enrollment projections, on which the district $69.6 Million expansion and renovation plan (up for referendum vote on October 17). The number of children any NYPH housing plans geared to families may bring in calls into question whether their $69 Million Capital Project is ambitious enough to expand elementary school capacity to handle future enrollment should the Presbyterian Hospital proceed with this project.

Park Vanishes. According to reports of Mr. Wood’s remarks released yesterday to the media, and denied this afternoon as inaccurate by Mr. Wood, it was indicated 131 homes would be built on the green portion of the the hospital property at the lower right location, and on the area of property showing the two proton-accelerator-biotech center buildings — the turquoise rectangles in lower center portion of this diagram. Steep slopes and streams in the lower left of the property would not be built on, according to Wood. Athletic fields covering 5-1/2 acres, consisting of a soccer field and baseball diamond (instead of the original 60 acres that would have been acquired in 2000, when Mr. Wood said, “the conservationists blew it”). As Marc Pollitzer, the North Street Assocation President, has often noted the hospital can build the housing as of right on the property.

Photo, WPCNR News Archive.

 

Paul Wood, the Mayor’s Executive Officer announced yesterday to media (not the CitizeNetReporter)  that Mayor Joseph Delfino encouraged and worked with the hospital  to develop an alternative development consisting of housing with 5.5 acres turned over to the city for recreation playing fields. The administration last year at this time in the early fall was denying knowledge of any change  the hospital plans for the proton accelerator had changed.

Portion of now-potential Housing Location along Bryant Avenue. Photo, WPCNR News Archive.

Wood originally was reported to have said the hospital proposes building 131 homes  on this north side of Bryant Avenue, as well  as development on the northside of the NYPH property.  He did not indicate what development of the northside would be. Now, Wood is saying the report of 131 homes being considered by the hospital is inaccurate.

WPCNR calls to New York Presbyterian Hospital spokesperson, Geoff Thompson, have placed questions as to what the nature of possible development of the Northside of the property would be like, whether the hospital plans to sell the property to a developer, or retain title, and whether the proton accelerator-biotech facility would be built elsewhere by the New York Presbyterian Hosptial. More detail is expected at this evening’s Common Council meeting.

Hospital Plan Change Originally Denied by City.

The first indication the hospital was changing its plans was reported by WPCNR January 28, 2005, when Vito Cappello Director of Development for North America of  Hitachi USA(which builds proton accelerators), told WPCNR the hospital was delaying the project and was not pursuing starting construction on the accelerator in the near future.

WPCNR reported after Mr. Cappello’s revelation,  that the New York Presbyterian Hospital was thinking of selling its land due to the increased value of their property indicated by the sale of the St. Agnes property to the North Street Community.  This WPCNR report was rigorously denied by the city.

Yesterday’s announcement shows the Mayor was negotiating with the hospital to put together  at least the subdivision for a park plan while his administration was denying the hospital was rethinking its plans.  The park subdivision (with most likely no mention of housing), is expected to be explained this evening at a Common Council work session.

 Last fall the report that the hospital was cooling on the proton acclerator-biotech center it had promoted as a state-of-the-art and had been earmarked to receive $100 Million plus in state aid to build it as a Center for Excellence by Governor George Pataki,would not comment on the reasons for the accelerator delay to WPCNR.

It has also been widely speculated that high rise development on the north side of the property in addition to the housing plan, is a logical extension of the residential high rise luxury housing being built by high profile developers in the White Plains downtown. High rise development on the north side of the hospital property would certainly be seen in some circles as complimenting  the toney Nordstrom’s, Bloomingdale’s, Nieman-Marcus, Fortunoff corridor on Bloomingdale Road.

School District Capacity Prognostications Go Out the Window

If a housing project is built it would be a massive subdivision consisting of what Wood was originally reported as describing as single family homes and townhouses.   however it shatters the anticipated enrollment projections the City School District is relying on to plan its $69.6 Million elementary school expansion and renovation now being considered. The building of the homes and further residential development on the north side of the hosptial property by Westchester Avenue could mean an influx of from 200 to 400 children or more into the City School System in addition to the present projected number of 280 elementary school children entering the at capacity school district facilities by 2010. This puts City School District enrollment projections into question, and raises the greater question of whether the $69.6 Million Capital Project on the October 17 Referendum is inadequate for the enrollment.

Previously, the City School District has reported that their enrollment figures for the school year 2010 are based on birth rate figures as of 2005, and do not take into account any future large scale family housing development.

Hits: 0

WPCNR ACROSS THE ANCHOR DESK. By John F. Bailey. September 20, 2006: The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric debuted two weeks ago nationally and about the only thing going for it is there’s a superbly turned out slightly older blonde on it.

 

If you’re looking for hard news, the CBS Evening News no longer has it. If you’re looking for reported news, there’s a lot less of it. If you want dirty laundry cleaned up,  sugar-coated by “the bubble-headed bleached blonde with a gleam in her eye,” you now have it.

The content has been boiled down to 11 minutes of hard news about three to 4 stories, 7 at the most, a field report  from a correspondent, a Free Speech segment featuring a celebrity commentator. There was casualty count in Iraq given on either day. (Remember Walter Cronkite’s Vietnam war dead crawl?).  There is a Snapshots Segment of fluff. The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric, is to this repawta, a “feel good about bad news” show.

 

I love Katie Couric’s legs, which are the highlights of the show. Entertainment Tonight was launched by the legs of its beautiful commentator Mary Hart, and the handlers at CBS have managed to give her a wardrobe that lifts her out of the vacuous cheerleader persona who captivated traveling executives in  the Radissons, Hiltons, and Sheratons of America,  waiting for meetings to begin on the Today Show for the past fifteen years.

 

Ms. Couric’s softball interviews for fifteen years were built up as better than they are, and her lack of a followup question is legend. This was clearly evident the first two nights. Katie Couric after all these years cannot bring herself to throw a brushback question.

 

Unfortunately that is not the job of the news. The news is to put reality in your face, or it used to be. That’s what I take from two weeks of Katie.

 

After the opening 11 minutes of hard news, such as it is. An event or two or three are tied together, given a common theme and analyzed by a correspondent, as if that proved anything.  Then you get 11 minutes of Today Show fluff that is not news at all but feel good pieces. Human interest. Celebrity bits.

 

There was no in-depth mention of business trends,  (in a week of inflation news up and down) except for one major business story each day – the Shell oil platforms in the Gulf Tuesday, and the General Motors story Wednesday. 

 

The show – and that’s what it is, not a newscast — intends to use Ms. Couric’s “strength:” interviews. She interviewed a Times reporter on national security her opening night and President George W. Bush Wednesday evening, using only three questions on the CIA prison transfer and request for congress to approve military tribunals. On another show discussing pre-cervical cancer drugs, a doctor let slip statistics on how sexually active fifteen year old girls are. Now that is a statement that Ms. Couric needed to delve deeper into. Did she? No.

 

On the homeland security interview on opening night, there was no mention of homeland security and border crossings, no questioning of homeland security inspection of cargo, and no question about homeland security surveillance of foreign students – all very valid concerns. Asking “Are we safer now?” of Thomas Friedman as Ms. Couric did is a box canyon question. People think it is tough but the really tough questions are specific ones. Actually Ms. Couric is not alone in asking easy to wrangle questions – the print press does this all the time in news conferences. 

 

A little news judgment please.

 

According to the CBS News Media Relations, the show is edited by Ms. Couric as Managing Editor, with Rome Hartman, Executive Producer a 15 year producer at 60 Minutes. Judging the first two editions of CBS EVENING NEWS WITH KATIE COURIC, we have a 30-minute Today”Show.

 

It is a show concentrating on style and feelings, and how we perch on a desk, while wasting incredible time in segues and graphic intros. 

 

You have only 22 minutes to tell people what is going on.  Katie and Rome are killinh 11 minutes with stories on the muppets, a blind teenager, pictures of the Cruise-Homes baby, a painting class in a South American country, plus editorial commentary from personalities. This is not news. It’s fluff. It is a margaritaville cocktail hour, not scotch on the rocks news.

 

If Ms. Couric and Mr. Hartman are going for the ratings with a newscast that makes you feel that things aren’t so bad out there and the human race is wonderful, and America’s o.k. they may be making a business decision that will work, but they are not doing a news show in any sense of the word in their first two weeks and the ratings are flattening.

 

I question their news objectivity because they stop short of the hard out there question.  How do they get the ultimate “get,” the President, on the day he announces a major policy change on prisoners of war? Of course you take the interview. But does Katie ask the question, (after the President tells her, we have to have victory in Iraq, and mentions dire consequences if the Iraqi government fails) “Mr. President, how do you define victory in Iraq?” She does not. Because she knows he has no idea.

 

Maybe, she did ask that question – but on the outtakes that wound up on her 10 o’clock special later that evening. And, another thing on the Bush interview.

 

 Bush mentions that the prisoner interrogations in the CIA secret prisons lead to the foiling of an anthrax plot and a plot to fly airplanes into buildings somewhere on the West Coast. Could Ms. Couric have asked what prisoners supplied that information, and if any arrests were made.  This is the first time those factoids were made public. She should have gotten his answers down to that off camera and reported it in copy if they did not have time for running the interview answer.

 

Katie Couric may not think she should ask those kinds of question out of respect for the President. But, Ms. Couric, you are the network anchor, you got to ask it. You got to think. Or maybe it is why she’s a network anchor today, because she knows better not to think – too much.

 

The show is not being edited to bring you meaty news content.

 

 In contrast, I recommend the nightly BBC 30-minute newscast that literally takes you around the world and is just packed with news you never see on Fox, CNN or MSNBC, CBS, NBC or ABC, that blows you away. It is better than any 30 minute slice of newscast you can watch on Fox News or CNN or ABC or NBC.  I believe the BBC packs in about a story a minute,  which gives you 22 news stories to about 4 to 7 for the CBS Evening News. The BBC stories are tightly written, delivered by a no-nonsense woman anchorette without the massive set, the “swoosh slides” and the anchor talks fast. The BBC is an adrenalin rush from the content alone.

 

Ms. Couric adopts the steadied pace as if she is trying to stretch to time – to give that “gravitas” of anchorman pace. However, she delivers too slowly as if she is conducting a class of third graders. In week two she resorted to a rundown of headlines then in-depth rundowns of the same headlines. I suggest this is a waste of time. Why say one thing, then say the same thing in more detail? It wastes time.

 

Nevertheless there’s her presence, excellent diction. Dividing up the program, teasing the next stories in a set format slows it down. I like her delivery, now if only I was getting more news. Remember, Katie and Rome, it’s the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric  not the CBS Evening Tonight Show with Katie Couric

 

The Today show was put together as a series of news, stories of the day, and features to provide an update beginning of the day with people you trust and make you feel good. Today started the banter between personalities long before Eyewitness News ever thought of it. News personalities were bantered with and the interviews were slowpitch city.

 

They are now doing the Today show in 30 minutes every evening.

 

Ms. Couric and Mr. Hartman are getting paid huge bucks to get the CBS Evening News up in the ratings. They did a lot of preparation in putting together this show to give what they found out apparently people want. They are betting America wants to feel good. They have moved the Today Show to the evening. They are smarter than I am.

 

Judging from my experience in Westchester County, and the lack of response to local news coverage, and lack of concern of the citizens about how their governments are run and local trends, if “sophisticated” Westchester likes to feel good about the lies their leaders tell them, then Hartman and Couric may be very right and be very successful with this bubble-headed bleached blonde format. She is better to look at than Brian Williams  and the Gibson guy.

 

 Now – she should do very well with fraternity houses on the nation’s campuses. Whether there’s enough news here to hold the news traditionalists who watch these programs is debatable. I don’t think there is. Can she tear away the women to watch her during the dinner hour?

 

However, Bob Schieffer, the last great CBS newsman reported on  the first week of the program, and stated when Ms. Couric asked in typical cliché fashion what do you think this CIA prison transfer means, Schieffer gave a classic analysis: “It gives congress something to do.” He also said busying congress with the proposal to give The President the right to conduct military tribunals would tie up congress and prevent them from working on things they should be working on like the deficit. This may be Schieffer’s last appearance on the program as a correspondent. It was a hilarious moment said in all earnesty.

 

That’s the trouble with the show in a nutshell – there is no time on a 30-minute show for commentary. You have 22 minutes of real airtime. Commentary means nothing unless it uses facts to demonstrate what is happening. Commentary limits the number of stories you can do. Besides commentary means nothing. It’s what has and is happening that counts.

 

When you watch the CBS Evening News With Katie Couric  in its present editing policy, you learn a miniscule amount of what is happening in the world and why it is happening.

 

Give me my old fedora and a Lucky Strike in my nicotine stained finger tips holding the copy, the time zone clocks on the set and an old news ticker,  rather than this cupcake in designer clothes with the legs up to here perched on an immaculate desk, looking like she just came back from lunch at Gotham Grill.

 

The news as we know has died.  

Hits: 0

On Absoluteness of Constitutional Amendments

January 19, 2013

Dear Editor

Regardless of the result of your poll, it is established law that constitutional amendments are not absolute.

There is the well-known exception to freedom of speech that you may not yell “Fire” in a crowded theater.

Likewise, no one is allowed to commit ritual human sacrifice no matter what their religious beliefs. This is also irrelevant to the issue of the Journal News’s gun permit map.

That is publicly available information by state law, and remains publicly available whether their map is up or not. I am not a member of the press and yet I can post the same information with impunity.

Clifford Blau

(Editor’s Note: Reading of the section of the New York State SAFE Act, page 30, sets new standards for anonymity of gun permit holders.)

 

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. September 19, 2006:  Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors addressed Mamaroneck Avenue School PTA-ers Tuesday evening in front of about 35 to 40 parents discussing the School Capital Improvement Project. Last week he conducted a similar pep rally at Post Road School. Connors also said that Fred Seiler, the new Assistant Superintendent for Business had begun his assignment with the district Monday replacing Terrance Schreurs, and that Mr. Schreurs’ last day was September 15.

 

 

Last week, Mr. Connors and Mr. Schreurs presented to the Post Road School PTA with very positive feedback from the crowd of over 50 parents in attendance last week. He is speaking on the need to pass the $69.6 Million Capital Project Referendum October 17. Photo, WPCNR News

 

Before the start of Mr. Connors’ Post Road School appearance one week ago, WPCNR interviewed Post Road Principal Laura Havis on why Post Road School needed to be replaced. She  explained that the Post Road School was close to 100 years old, and there was general agreement that “something had to be done.” She told me the district was forced to continually repair the school, there were continuing problems with the heating and air conditioning systems, that the size of the school classrooms did not meet state standards, that the school was not accessible to the handicapped, and that it flooded on the below street level perpetually during heavy rains.

 

 She also reminded WPCNR that the School District Capital Project Committee had “seen the school for themselves” and agreed the school needed replacing. Asked if parents had complained to her about the condition of the school, Principal Havens said, “Nobody has complained to me (about the condition of the school).”

 

Laura Havis, left, Bill Pollak, Acting President of the Board of Education, and Superintendt of Schools Timothy Connors talking about the Capital Project Referendum coming up on October 17 at Post Road School one week ago. Photo by WPCNR News

 

Superintendent Connors kicked off the meeting, telling the Post Road parents, “We need your help,” and went on to explain that the district would be taking “more time with faculty and staff” to finetune the interior design of the new Post Road School configuration. He said, “We have an estimate from our architect (Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson) in terms of what we think it will cost (to build — $38.7 Million), then once we do that we then design the school. Many of you want a say as to what that school will look like. We will form a committee to give you input.”

 

Connors said it will take two years to build the new Post Road School. He stressed that the new school was not going to happen, “if you don’t get out to vote (October 17). Then we’ll share with you what the concept is. Join us in selling this referendum to the community.”

 

The Superintendent of Schools said approval of the referendum will benefit Kindergarten through third grade grades (by increasing capacity at Post Road),  and “improve education for all of our children.” He promised an October 3 “Open House” at Post Road School in order to show the community the present state of the Post Road facility.

 

Connors noted that the Capital Project Committee formed by the Board of Education had toured Post Road School on a Saturday and by their observations , “they agreed we need to replace this school.”

 

On the Mamaroneck Avenue School renovation (estimated to cost $4.6 Million), he said, “They need additions to the core facility, and a new library.”

 

He placed the cost of the total Capital Project at $69,635,000, which will be partially defrayed by $2 Million in aid from the state and $1 Million from the Louis Cappelli Foundation, leaving the district to borrow for $66.6 Million.

 

Connors said the infrastructure improvements to all the schools (costing $16 Million) would pay for new boilers, roofs, windows, lights, new core investment. He noted that the other elementary schools, with exception of Ridgeway and Church Street School and the middle schools and high school were more than fifty years old and upgrades were needed. He hammered home the point that “all children will benefit.”

 

On the subject of the fields, Parker Stadium and Loucks Field, which are scheduled to be upgraded with synthetic turf, new metal bleachers, and press boxes and locker rooms, (at a cost of $9.6 Million), Connors said the synthetic turf would enable soccer, lacrosse, field hockey and football to be played with more games, more often, as many as four to five games a day, as well as providing more practice time than the present grass fields for a host of teams, as well as community recreation teams.

 

Connors described the field projects as “the right thing to do for the district and the city. ”

 

The cost of the capital project, Terrance Schreurs said was a 1% increase in the tax rate, little more than $4 plus per thousand dollars of assessed value.

 

Schreurs said for every year the district delays, it adds $2 Million to the cost of the project. Schreurs said that Triton Construction, the Project Manager, estimated that construction costs are rising at the rate of 8% a year.  “The time is right,” Connors added. “The best thing you can do is commit yourself to getting out the vote.”

 

During the Question and Answer period, Connors said that by building the Post Road School, and the improvements to Mamaroneck Avenue School, the district would be able keep its present class size ratio while accommodating the projected school enrollment growth of 280 more students in the elementary K-5 level. If the referendum is defeated, class size would go up, he said.

 

In response to questions, he pointed out that to renovate the present building would not only cost 78% of  the cost of building a new structure ($29 Million to $38.7 Million), but the district might have to lease space to accommodate students while renovating the Post Road structure. “It’s (the present Post Road School) not worth the investment (to renovate),” Connors said. “Cost of acquiring another site,” Connors said, “would be a million dollars an acre. The present Post Road site is the best option in terms of site and cost effectiveness.”

 

Connors appealed to the Post Road parents in attendance, to think of “What we can do to try and sell our cast to the people, that there’s something in here for everyone in the community that’s going to enrich that community.”

 

In response to a question, Connors said that the new Post Road School would pick up one class per grade (5 classes at  20 pupils each) to increase its capacity to 600 students, putting it on a level with the other four elementary schools. (As of  September 1, 2006, Post Road serves 493 students, Church Street School 626, Mamaroneck Avenue School, 605, Ridgeway School, 646, and George Washington School, 654.)

 

Bill Pollak, acting President of the Board of Education, in attendance  suggested to the parents, “How do you sell this? All people who own real estate will really benefit. If we don’t do it (vote for the referendum) for the right reasons  maybe they will do it for that reason.”

 

Connors noted to the crowd, “You have tohelp us make sure there’s a legacy for future generations.”

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey September 18, 2006: Former School Board member Sarina Russell addressed the Board of Education last Monday evening and drew attention to the Board very quietly softening the standards of the School District Athletic and Co-Currcular Pledge.

 

Sarina Russell Criticises the Board of Education for watering down the District Co-Curricular Pledge, Monday evening, September 11. Photo, WPCNR News.

 

In light of the arrest of a Horace Greeley Cross Country Star last week, being allowed to compete in a Cross Country match Saturday (and finishing second) after being arrested and charged with unlawfully dealing with a child (a teenager at the runner’s drinking party was hospitalized with alcohol poisoning), Ms. Russell’s remarks were precognizant.

 

The new White Plains pledge that athletes and participants in WPHS sports and extra-curricular activities is significant in what it now says will happen to students caught drinking underage, drugging, or breaking laws.

 

In 2005-2006, the code read: “Upon initial disclosure (Editor’s Note: not on conviction) the resulting action can be automatic suspension from participation for a period of time to be determined by White Plains High School Administration or the Superintendent of Schools.” B. A second offense can result in automatic suspension from participation for a period of one calendar year form the date of violation. C. a third offense can result in permanent suspension from all co-curricular participation..

 

Note: These standards of behavior are in effect both in and out of school, 24 hours/day.

 

A Quiet Change

 

 

This spring this code was under consideration by the district and original writings were attempting to make it tougher and spell out circumstances of punishment. However, over the summer, it was changed (in discussion with parents, coaches, administrators, stakeholders) to only include offenses committed while participating in school team or school group-sponsored activities, or committed on school grounds,  giving the appearance of allowing students to go undisciplined for infractions like underage drinking, drug consumption that they commit on their own time. (Apparently, the Horace Greeley School District approach is being adapted.)

 

(WPCNR is not aware of when or how this was adapted, since the last time it was being discussed was in June, and it was not promulgated to the general public for comment to this reporter’s knowledge.)

 

Off Campus Behavior Not School Related Not covered.

No Automatic Suspension.

 

The new Pledge is a departure from the 2005-2006 code and would appear that WPHS students will not be considered for punishment for doing drugs, drinking underage, fighting and violent behavior as long as it is not committed on school grounds, or on school trips. A student involved in a criminal investigation for an offense in the community however will be subject to a school review and possible penalty. What constitutes a criminal investigation is not defined, such as does the investigation have to result in actual arrest and charges filed on the misbehaving student.

 

The new code eliminates the “automatic suspension” punishment regardless of conviction, and appears to expand the period of time between offense and when discipline will be administered, while setting a series of softer “punishments.” The pledge in the 2006-2007 Parent Information Handbook dealing with consequences reads:

 

“I also understand that any violation of this pledge found after a proper investigation by school authorities will result in disciplinary action, including a warning, probation, a specified period of suspension and/or permanent suspension from the athletic and/or co-curricular activity. Also, I further understand that this process applies to a student who is the subject of a criminal investigation whether in school or in the community.”

 

The automatic suspension punishment for students committing such offenses outside of school trips and team activities,  has been replaced with a mandatory referral to a district counselor for the offending student(s):

 

“I understand that I am expected to conduct myself both in school and in the community in a manner which demonstrates personal integrity and positive reflects on me and the  District. If I am involved in an incident in the community which involves drug, alcohol or violent behavior, I understand I will be referred to a district counselor.”

 

Accountability Softened.

 

Judging from the way the pledge reads now, the fate of a White Plains athlete, a member of a school civic club who held a drinking party (as the Horace Greeley  Cross Country student did last week),  and was caught would suffer no penalty, and not even be investigated by the school district.

 

Perhaps referral to a counselor will be made, however the pledge does not say it is  mandatory for the student recommended to a District counselor to see the counselor.

 

 

The new White Plains pledge does not spell out the grounds for suspension, and even states that the offending student may be given, in this order, a warning, probation, suspension. This appears to indicate the students misbehaving on school grounds, trips and school-related functions face little to worry about. Nowhere does it say in the pledge that the student offense will be put on the student’s permanent record.

 

Russell Raps the Board’s Knuckles.

 

Addressing the Board of Education last Monday night, Ms. Russell, a former BOE member, was appalled about the ambiguity of the new document and that it appears to say the district will only discipline students who violate the conditions of the pledge on school grounds, events or trips.

 

She told the Board of Education in certain terms: “It doesn’t do the job,” she said. “ It’s a cover your backside document not meant to be a punishment for children who do things they’re not supposed to do. It doesn’t send the right message. This document does not make me proud and I am angry that I have to sign something I don’t believe in.”

 

The Board of Education did not comment.

 

Reading the two pledges together, it appears the White Plains City School District is taking the Horace Greeley School District approach to student drinking parties and other offenses as long as it does not happen where the school district is in charge.

 

In the last three years, White Plains athletes and students found drinking on student trips and off-campus have received brief suspensions from participation, but have been allowed to remain on teams and in their activities, completing their seasons. Punishments for the offending students were hard to find out about except by “word of mouth.” 

 

The school district settled a multi-million damage suit stemming from a Highlands attack on a student. The amount was not disclosed by the plaintiff’s lawyer,  LeRoy Wilson, Jr.  who confirmed the settlement to WPCNR. The School District attempted to cover up the assault of the male student by other students on the Highlands campus, and did not report it to the police. The resulting law suit brought by the parent of the victim for not being informed of what had happened was settled.

 

Meanwhile Up in Chappaqua

 

The Horace Greeley School District has not disciplined the football team members allegedly involved in the party in Chappaqua hosted by the charged Cross Country runner. Media reports indicate the football team members at the Cross Country star’s party will not be suspended either.

 

It is interesting to note that the Horace Greeley student who hostessed the drinking party and was charged with unlawfully dealing with a child, told reporters after her Cross Country match the Saturday following the party, that “everything’s been blown out of proportion.”

 

Reading the two pledges together, it appears the White Plains City School District is taking the Horace Greeley School District approach to student drinking parties and other offenses as long as it does not happen where the school district is in charge.

 

The two Co-Curricular documents follow in their entirety:

 

2005-2006 Student Code of Conduct Participation in Co-Curricular and Athletic Programs:

 

As a candidate for participation in co-curricular programs at White Plains High School, it is our hope that you will take advantage of the school’s numerous opportunities. It is very important that the student and parents/guardians read and understand the essential policies involved relative to participation. We view it as an honor and a privilege to represent White Plains High School as a member of a school sports team or student activity and thus, by accepting this honor, the student must accept the responsibilities that accompany it. These regulations have been established for the benefit of those who participate as representatives of our school in a variety of teams and clubs.

 

Each member must do the following to maintain eligibility to participate in co-curricular activities:

1. Abide by the rules and regulation as specified by the District, the school and for athletes, the New York State Public High Schools Athletic Association.
   
2. Abide by all club activity rules as specified by the club advisor and the Student Activities Coordinator, and for athletes, all team and training rules as specified by the coach and Athletic Director.
   
3. Comply with academic eligibility requirements as established by White Plains High School
   
4. Demonstrate good citizenship and appropriate behavior at all times as a representative of the school and community.
   
5. Use transportation provided by the school traveling to and from all events. (Exception: advanced Transportation Release Form is available in Student Activities or Athletic Office.

 

 

The following actions will be taken when a student is found in possession of controlled substances, weapons, or is using or selling tobacco (excluding non-athletes), alcohol (except as part of a religious ceremony), marijuana, concaine, steroids, or any other controlled substance:

 

1. Upon initial disclosure, the resulting action can be automatic suspension from participation for a period of time to be determined by White Plains High School Administration.
   
2. A second offense can result in automatic suspension from participation for a period of one calendar year from the date of violation.
   
3. A third offense can result in permanent suspension from all co-curricular participation.

 

NOTE: These standards of behavior are in effect both in and out of school, including 24 hours/day.

Due process review shall be afforded to all students, and an investigation of circumstances will be completed in a timely fashion. ANY VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS WILL RESULT IN APPROPRIATE ACTION TAKEN BY THE PRINCIPAL, THE ATHLETIC DIRECTOR, THE STUDENT ACTIVITIES COORDINATOR AND ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGNEE DEPENDING ON THE SERIOUS NESS OF THE SITUATION AND THE FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION THE ADMINSTRATION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO EXCEED OR REDUCE THE EXTENT OF THE DISCIPLINARY ACTION TO BE TAKEN.

 

(Parent and athlete are expected and required to sign and return the pledge)

 

The 2006-2007 ATHLETIC AND CO-CURRICULAR PLEDGE

 

The athletic and co-curricular activities at the Middle School and High School are integral parts of the overall educational program of the White Plains City School District. Participation in these activities is a privilege granted to students who maintain scholarship and citizenship within the rules and regulations of the District. The  District believes that it is imperative that parents and the school district work together to set high expectations for student behavior both on and off campus.

 

The District expects that I will uphold the high standards of academic eligibility and abide by the rules specified by my coach/advisor. As a participant in an athletic and/or co-curricular activity, I will comply with all the provisions of the District’s Code of Conduct, and I pledge as follows:

 

• I will not possess, consume, be under the influence of, and/or distribute alcohol, tobacco and/or unlawful drugs, such as marijuana, cocaine or other controlled substances on school grounds or at school-sponsored events and trips.
  
• I will not engage in hazing, harassment, fighting, theft, vandalism or violent conduct on school grounds or at school-sponsored events and trips.
  
• I will not possess, consume and/or distribute performance-enhancing drugs or steroids at any time.

 

I also understand that any violation of this pledge found after a proper investigation by school authorities will result in disciplinary action, including a warning, probation, a specified period of suspension and/or permanent suspension from the athletic and/or co-curricular activity. Also, I further understand that this process applies to a student who is the subject of a criminal investigation whether in school or in the community.

 

I understand that I am expected to conduct myself both in school and in the community in a manner which demonstrates personal integrity and positively reflects on me and the District. If I am involved in an incident in the community which involves drug, alcohol or violent behavior, I understand I will be referred to a district counselor.

 

I have read the above and accept responsibility for my actions under this pledge

 

(Parent and student are expected to sign the pledge)