CITY PUBLIC MEETING ON TRANSIT CENTER FUTURE TROUBLED START–“NO MEANINGFUL PUBLIC FEEDBACK AT ALL” “LIP SERVICE TO PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT.”

Hits: 24

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. FEBRUARY 19,  2016:
To the editor of White Plains CitizenNetReporter:
As a White Plains environmental group concerned with sustainability issues in all White Plains development, EcoNeighbors was shocked that the supposed public feedback at the Feb. 11, 2016, White Plains Transit District “Public Engagement Meeting was a sum total of literally 2 texted words per person.
  And the sum total of the “public learning” was a series of stand-up boards around the periphery of a room so packed that no one could see the boards, with only an occasional, haphazard one-on-one introduction of a Stakeholder Task Force member, depending on who an attendee happened to bump into in the crowd.
There was no signage as to who was responsible for the displays or any explanation about their significance.  It was not clear how the exercise at a couple of the boards, asking people to indicate where they live, work, or get to the train, would be used.  Nor was it clear how the auditorium texted responses would be used.  If this use of technology was designed to impress the attendees, we doubt it had that effect.
During the sit-down auditorium presentation, neither the Mayor nor the Planning Commissioner had the courtesy or professionalism to introduce anyone from Parsons Brinckerhoff, the consultancy the group the city hired four months ago at a cost of $794,000 out of the $1 million NYSERDA grant from the State of NY.  Nor was Parsons Brinkerhoff given an opportunity to speak or answer questions from the audience. 
The Mayor mentioned the existence of a Task Force Advisory Committee, but – twice – he said he could not state their names!
Here is what true public engagement must be:
From the podium before the large sit-down audience in the auditorium, all Stakeholder Task Force appointees should have introduced themselves to everyone, and given their qualifications or reasons for having been appointed by the Mayor (e. g., the Stakeholder Task Force includes no one from BID — despite the Mayor’s stated goal of creating a walkable connection between the train station and Mamaroneck Avenue businesses!)

Representatives from Parsons Brinckerhoff, hired four months ago, should have been introduced to everyone in the auditorium, and their qualifications provided.

Parsons Brinckerhoff should have given a visual and oral presentation about past projects they will use as concepts for the White Plains project, and of various options they’re exploring for our Transit District.
There should have been a presentation of exciting, great models of the various project components that White Plains residents might consider from cities around the US and the world.

There should have been an opportunity for citizens to ask questions and voice their concerns from a microphone so that the entire audience could hear and learn from each other. 
If the city is truly serious about public engagement with this process, they must have more than 3 public meetings of the Feb. 11 type.  And these citizen meetings must take place before the decisions have been made.  The City cannot wait for its next public meeting until June, 9 months after Parsons Brinckerhoff was hired, and 4 months before the end of the NYSERDA-funded project!
White Plains can be tremendously proud of the level of knowledge, skill, and learning/research capacity of our citizens.  Residents separately sending in feedback via website forms (or texting single words in a public meeting) does not allow us to learn from each other and develop our ideas togetherWe should have meetings which bring together residents and design professionals in focus groups, workshops, and presentations.  The City must provide genuine opportunities for citizen-group input.
The Feb. 11 “Public Engagement” meeting seemed designed to keep residents atomized and confused about the Transit District redevelopment project, not to truly bring residents together to learn and provide citizen-group ideas.  It enabled the city to take photos of the huge attendance to “prove” to NYSERDA that they had the required public engagement, when in fact they had no meaningful public feedback at all.
The City must truly use its outstanding citizens’ skills and experiences, not just give lip service to public engagement.
Sincerely,

Deb Von Glahn
Ann Ladd
Al Gassman
Yvonne Gumowitz
Carry Kyzivat

Anne Bobroff-Hajal

White Plains, NY

Comments are closed.