Gun Law Killed; Pinnacle OK’d for 28 Stories; North St Community Gets Bad News

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey. August 8, 2006: The Common Council as expected last night voted to table a proposed new local law which would license owners of air guns, and subject nonlicensed gun holders to fines.


The council also approved on the consent agenda  the Ginsburg Development Corporation proposal to raise the height of The Pinnacle project to 27 stories (28, including the mechanicals), while reserving decision, according to Councilman Benjamin Boykin, on the affordable housing arrangement Mr. Ginsburg has to build his 52 units of affordable housing.


Boykin said the Council is giving Ginsburg time to work out his financing with the county, otherwise, Boykin said the affordable housing that the Ginsburg project will be building for fellow developer Louis Cappelli would revert to being Mr. Cappelli’s responsibility.


Boykin said on the Council television cablecast,  that Ginsburg is attempting to obtain  financing but that “time was of the essence,” that the council was giving the developer time. Ginsburg, according to the Westchester County Business Journal is seeking performance bond financing from the Westchester County Industrial Development Agency. The performance bonds would guarantee his building the affordable housing piece (52 units), and allow the Common Council to waive the restriction that the affordable housing Louis Cappelli owed as part of his 221 Main Ritz Carlton project approval had to be opened before Cappelli received a certificate of occupancy for the posh hotel, the first tower of which is looming over Main Street.


Cibelli: County Holding up Pinnacle for Senior Housing Approval


Earlier, during the Citizens to be Heard segment of the monthly Common Council meeting, Cass Cibelli, the Republican candidate for the remaining one year term in the deceased Robert Greer’s term ( Cibelli is opposing Dennis Power, the interium appointee to Greer’s seat), spoke out accusing Westchester County of holding up IDA performance bonds for the Martin Ginsburg project as the price for White Plains agreeing to the County senior housing project on the former post office parking lot. In an interview with WPCNR, Cibelli said: “It’s just not right. I propose that the county has put pressure on Ginsburg in order to get the city to the table concerning the old post office site.  Something’s going on and I don’t like it.”


WPCNR asked him how he thought the county was pressuring Ginsburg, Cibelli said, “I’m not quite sure. Their IDA not seeing through the Pinnacle proposal, the senior housing,  and leaving it up to the city and the urban renewal agency to get it off the ground doesn’t make sense to me. Here they (the IDA)  had the opportunity to support Ginsburg, to have the affordable housing built  where it was needed — whether they applied pressure I don’t know.”


WPCNR asked if Cibelli thought the county was holding up approval of the Ginsburg performance bonds because of the position the city has taken opposing the county rental of the Grand Avenue Post Office lot to a private developer to build senior housing. Cibelli said, “It goes back to the (Rob) Astorino campaign and the Mayor (Delfino) lightly supporting changing the county policy towards the drop-in shelter at the airport. I think this is retribution. This is all vindictive policy and it’s wrong.”


Cibelli told WPCNR the IDA should approve performance bonding for Mr. Ginsburg, and also said “We (White Plains) should have our own IDA and we shouldn’t have the county meddling in the affairs of the city.”


Cibelli also said Dennis Power “cannot be in service of two masters. He must make a decison (between continued employment with the county and being a White Plains Common Councilman.)


Wyndham Close 5, North Street Community, 1 (at this time)


In the main event, the hearing on the senior condominium-office complex-assisted living facility proposed for the St. Agens Property by North Street Community,  residents of Wyndham Close overwhelmed supporters of the project with repeated objections to the project’s height (7 stories), location of the residences, and the density of the project.


Despite professing support for senior housing in White Plains, the Wyndham Close residents wanted the project cut back in size drastically, without saying what size would be acceptable. A handful of speakers supported the project because the developer has promised to keep the Carvel Rehabilitation Center for disabled children on the site.


Another issue raised was the precedent the creation of a senior citizen zone would set. Marc Pollitzer, the tireless defender of city zoning, said other developers were watching the council on the creation of this zone, saying that Burke Hospital and New York Presbyterian Hospital would move to create just such a special zone for their own advantage.


Council is Suddenly Concerned.


The onslaught of opposition succeeded in producing a groundswell of objections and reservations by five members of the Common Council. Benjamin Boykin said, “the project is too high, too dense, and it needs to be scaled back.” Boykin also said he was surprised to learn North Street Community had applied for a “tax cert.” Rita Malmud said she liked the project for the site but made a number of vague objections on height, age eligibility of potential condo owners.


Glen Hockley was more circumspect, saying the project needs to be looked at and discussed but said to Wyndham Close residents that they had been heard.  Arnold Bernstein said he felt there was a veiled threat by the developer within the DEIS statement that the Carvel Rehabilitation Center might not survive if the project were to change. New Councilman Dennis Power went into a lengthy criticism of the project size, and the traffic it would create.


Councilman Thomas Roach, brought the council back to reality by pointing out the council was there simply to close the DEIS hearing tonight, not vote on the project. He voiced concerns about the density, but stressed it was important the council consider the impact on all the city, not just the neighborhood immediately adjacent the St. Agnes property (Wyndham Close).


It was not a good night for C. J. Follini, the North Street Community partner, who asked the council to approve the project as submitted, noting most of all it would put the property back on the tax rolls, and serve the growing need for senior housing.  He was staring five perfectly clear “No” votes in the face. It is most unusual for the council to voice its opinion one way or the other on a project at the closure of the DEIS hearing. This was the first time in the year that the nature of the project has been known, with its site plan shown to the council numerous times,  that the council has stated fierce opposition to the scope of the project. Follini has said all along that the size of the project was necessary for its viability.


The Commissioner of Planning detailed the process that was next. The DEIS (Draft Environmetal Impact Statement) hearing tonight would be closed, which the Council promptly did after the councilpersons noted their feelings on the project as outlined above. The Commissioner of Planning said there would be a 10 day written comment period, then the developer would prepare a Final Environmental Impact Statement and the council would with help of staff prepare a Findings Statement prior to final decision on the project. The Commissioner said the process would take about three months.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

City Cuts Macy’s Assessment in Half. Refunds $523,337.

Hits: 0

WPCNR QUILL & EYESHADE. By John F. Bailey. August 7, 2006 UPDATED August 8, 2006: Tastefully tucked away in the First Reading Ordinances, Items 29-30 on Monday evening’s Common Council Agenda was an ordinance authorizing the first of the new fiscal year’s certioraris, which is a $523,337 refund to Macy’s of The Galleria, and a corresponding lopping of their assessment from $1.8 Million to $900,000, continuing the assessment drain lead by commercial properties in the city.


 


The $523,337 refund translates to approximately an additional  $2.1 Million refund from the city school district. (School Taxes are 4 times the city tax). The School District is planning to issue an $8 Million bond to cover this and other expected certiorari refunds this year, the debt service coming out of school taxes.


 


The Monday evening  settlement covers tax years 1995-96 through 2005-2006. Paul Wood, the City’s Executive Officer, said the settlement is not a new one but is the other half of the settlement with Federated Department Stores from last year where Bloomingdales’ received a tax cert. Wood  confirmed the $523,337 would come out of this year’s budget and affect the 2007-2008 tax roll.


 


Mr. Wood also said that the city made its budget in the final quarter of 2005-2006 ending June 30, actually making more than the budget called for, and he would get the figures for WPCNR from the Commissioner of Finance. WPCNR awaits the good news.


 


It is too early to tell whether this is the beginning of a new raft of certioraris that will outpace increases in assessments from condominium and home sales and possibly increased PILOT payments this year that will result in additional pressures on the school and city taxes, or perhaps, keep the assessment roll even which would stop a disturbing trend.


 


In the last four years, the City Tax Roll has declined $22,472,507, ($4.4 Million in 2003-2004, $9.1 Million in 2004-2005, $2.6 Million in 2005-2006, and 2006-2007, $6.3 Million). This has shifted the burden of paying for the city and school services to the homeowner to the benefit of the commercial property owner.


 


Meanwhile the White Plains homeowner is paying the vast share of taxes, and faces a watershed increase in taxes as the school district prepares to repair its physical buildings.


 


The school budget at $165.8  Million in 2006-2007 has grown from $89.4 Million in 1995-96. That is an increase of 86% in a decade when inflation has risen 26%. To finance this growth and the recent declines in city commercial assessments, the school district has increased Mr. and Mrs. White Plains school taxes 92%. From $202.91/$1,000 of assessed valuation(1995-1996) TO $449.64/$1,000 in 2006-2007.


 


With the city budget fat with expenses that outstrip its revenues this has resulted in an increase of city taxes of 7.8% this year.  The continued dwindling of commercial property assessments of established successful business mainstays of the city  through the certiorari process appears to be continuing  as evidenced by the Macy’s refund  approved Monday night. 


 


.

Posted in Uncategorized

Cellphone Windfall Introduces New Revenue Stream?

Hits: 0

 


 


WPCNR NEWS AND COMMENT. By John F. Bailey. August 6, 2006: Reports from the Mayor’s Office last week indicated that the Air Pistol Ordinance on tonight’s Common Council agenda will be tabled – depriving the city of licensing fees from sale of air pistols


 


 But wait! Just in the nick of time, thanks to the wonderful investigative reporting of the Journal News staff, Allan Hevesi, the state Comptroller,  crack auditor and watch dog of the exchequer, has discovered an unbelievable error in the Unified Court System manual in stating who gets to keep the fines collected from illegal cellphone use violations.


It seems that the Journal News double checked with the Comptroller’s on how fines are collected, someone up in the Comptroller’s office said, Sheesh! They’re doing it wrong,  that cities, including White Plains are able to keep their cellphone fine collections (estimated at over $1 Million for White Plains alone). White Plains according to its Executive Officer has been sending all the bucks to the state.


 


Is this any way to run a collection system? A little proofreading in the court system, please! More incredulous is that the city financial and legal departments did not make themselves absolutely clear on the handsfree cellphone law and catch this error.


 


 So White Plains is getting $1.1 Million back from the state, according to The Journal News report. It’s very similar to Westchester County amd Con Edision giving the impression Westchester storm victims of July storms would get $360 food spoilage refunds, and having WPCNR find out from Con Edison that food spoilage resulting from storm damage wasn’t covered.


 


The handsfree use of a cellphone windfall  is good news and bad news for White Plains residents and those who drive into White Plains from elsewhere.


 


Now the White Plains Police, as if they do not have enough to do,  have new incentive to start enforcing the handsfree cellphone law within the White Plains city limits. White Plains gave out a ton of cellphone tickets, but all of it previously went to the state.


 


Now  on any routine traffic day, handsfree cellphone driving  violations are rampant in White Plains. (Perhaps reporters can get exclusions.)


 


There just aren’t enough police to spot all the cellphone violators!


 


Now, that thanks to The Journal News, any White Plains handsfree cellphone  jing will go direct into the hungry maw of the White Plains hurting General Fund.


 


So drivers within the city limits of White Plains should watch themselves.


The first thing White Plains Police could do is assign just one officer to walk a beat up and down Mamaroneck Avenue and Main Streets and let him just watch the “handheld cellphone talkers.


 


The police now have more than enough incentive to form an elite “Cell Sweep Team” to go along with their SWAT team to concentrate solely on handsfree cellphone while driving offenders. Perhaps some new cell phone signal detection equipment can be purchased through a grant to note cell phone signals within the city limits that are moving….the equivalent of cellphone radar – sort of like applying LO-JAC principles to hansfree cellphone while driving violations. Perhaps a visual can be established on each individual cellphone use…with a floating squad of BP’s (bicycle police) on cruise to swiftly close on the individual.


 


Or better yet, while the Parking Department Parking Enforcement Officers, (or whatever they are called – never got an official release on that one), are out writing their 40 tickets an hour (the amount needed to reach their projections for 06-07) they can keep a sharp eye peeled for drivers holding a cellphone and conducting conversations while driving – and aid police enforcement.


 


Or perhaps the Parking Enforcement Officers can walk up to the window of a car and write them up. (I do not believe they are empowered to do that now. We’ll check on it.)


 


 Perhaps the Common Council will consider an ordinance allowing the Parking Department Officers to write up drivers holding handheld cellphone conversations. Driving violations, at $100 a vio – it’s far more lucrative than parking tickets.


 


I am breathing a sigh of relief the city deficit is shrinking already.


 


Thank you Journal News!

Posted in Uncategorized

Bradley Notes Legislative Successes.

Hits: 0

WPCNR’S ADAM IN ALBANY. By Assemblyman Adam T. Bradley. August 4, 2006: I am very pleased to announce that the governor recently signed legislation I authored to facilitate communication between parents and teachers by establishing an Internet-based communications system for schools (Ch. 160 of 2006). The new law, known as the Parent-Teacher Communications Act will help parents remain involved in their children’s education.

 


 


A child’s education is greatly enhanced by parental involvement. Unfortunately, large class sizes and busy parental work schedules often do not allow for sufficient communication between parents and teachers. This new law will help bridge the gap between the home and the classroom.


 


The Parent-Teacher Communications Act requires the state Education Department to develop guidelines to help schools establish Internet communication systems for parents or guardians to communicate with teachers. Combined with reform and oversight legislation, the measure will help parents communicate with teachers and enable them to provide important information and stay more involved with their children’s education. It will also enable educators to provide parents with important information regarding their child and make educators more accessible.


 


I have been working to ensure that our children have the best education and that our schools operate in the most efficient manner. Last year, I sponsored a new law (Ch.263 of 2005) to increase oversight of school districts statewide. To continue these efforts, the Legislature’s 2006-07 bipartisan budget agreement doubles the money for state Comptroller audits of schools, providing $2.8 million over last year to make sure our tax dollars make it into the classroom. 


 


Money alone cannot achieve our educational goals; we must have accountability and we must have reform. We must involve parents and help enhance their role in our children’s education. I look forward to continue working on measures that make sure that our schools are the very best they can be.


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Greenburgh Reaches Franchise Agreement with Verizon for Community Cable/Fibre Op

Hits: 0

WPCNR WHITE PLAINS VARIETY. August 3, 2006: Greenburgh Town Supervisor Paul Feiner announced today that the Town of Greenburgh, Ardsley, Hastings-on-Hudson, Irvington and Tarrytown have reached a franchise agreement with the fibre optic upstart, Verizon on a 10-year Franchise agreement which will see Verizon agreeing to wireoffering residents of those villages and towns competitive programming and services (including 77 channels), with Cablevision agreeing to provide cable television service to all residents within five years.


Verizon will pay the villages and towns 5% of their Gross Revenues from subscribers they attract and a Public Education Government Access Grant to each town.  Verizon will provide three public access channels to serve the towns and villages and in theory offer cable channels competitive with those of Cablevision. The summary provided by Mr. Feiner did not say whether this included new production facilities, or whether the three channels would serve all five towns.


Verizon will begin the agreement paying the towns a Public Educational Government Access Grants, ($88, 843 to Greenburgh, $61,983 to Hastings, $41,322 to Tarrytown, $33,058 to Irvington and $24,793 to Ardsley, which separate from the 5% of gross revenues (no estimate of project gross revenues was given). In the future the Grants, separate from the 5% of Gross Revenues Fee, are pegged at  57 cents a subscriber for Ardsley; 60 cents a subscriber for Greenburgh, 75 cents a sub for Hastings, 55 cents for Irvington and 69 cents for Tarrytown.


Paul Feiner in a statement released to the media said, “I have been pushing for cable TV competition since the early 1980s. I believe that competition will result in better service, more options for customers and hopefully more competitive rates.”


Feiner announced the Greenburgh Town Board will be holding a hearing on the agreement August 9 at 7:15 PM in Greenburgh Town Hall.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Greenburgh Reaches Agreement with Verizon for Fiber Optic Cable Service

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE FEINER REPORT. By Town of Greenburgh Supervisor Paul Feiner. August 3, 2006: Paul Feiner has announced an agreement with Verizon to provide cable fiber optic service to Greenburgh and assorted villages, to the media today. Here is Mr. Feiner’s announcement and explanation of the agreement:


The Greenburgh Town Board will be holding a hearing on a proposed agreement that will enable the town to have cable TV competition. Verizon is seeking a franchise with the town. The hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 9th at 7:15 PM at Greenburgh Town Hall. If you are able to attend the hearing to express your thoughts on the proposed franchise and on the concept of cable TV competition – it would be appreciated.  I have been pushing for cable TV competition since the early 1980s. I believe that competition will result in better service, more options for customers and hopefully more competitive rates. The following is a summary of the proposed franchise agreement.  The Town Board has the option to vote on the agreement at the August 9th meeting or to put the vote off till our September meeting. Cablevision is also in the process of concluding a proposed franchise agreement with the town.
PAUL FEINER


 


Here is the text of the Town of Greenburgh agreement with Verizon:


 


SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS BETWEEN VERIZON NEW YORK INC. AND THE VILLAGE OF ARDSLEY THE TOWN OF GREENBURGH, THE VILLAGE OF HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON, THE VILLAGE OF IRVINGTON, THE VILLAGE OF TARRYTOWN


 


Background


 


A Consortium of the Town of Greenburgh and the villages of Ardsley, Hastings-on-Hudson, Irvington and Tarrytown (Consortium) has conducted a process originally seeking to simultaneously conclude both a new cable television franchise with Verizon New York Inc. and a renewal cable television franchise with Cablevision of Westchester.  However, this original objective has proven elusive for a number of reasons. Consequently, the Consortium in consultation with elected and appointed officials of its constituent municipalities more recently has focused on negotiations with Verizon New York Inc. in response to the latter’s demonstrated greater interest in concluding an agreement. The document that you have either received or soon will be receiving represents the results of these negotiations.


The renewal process with Cablevision remains open and the Consortium looks forward to resuming that process at the earliest opportunity.



Process


 It should be stressed that this franchising process is not a competitive bid situation.   Verizon and Cablevision are each entitled to a franchise (or renewal) to provide cable television service if they (a) comply with federal and state laws and regulations and (b) agree to meet the reasonable cable-related community needs specified by the local franchising authority (i.e.,the Town and each of the villages).



The Consortium prepared for negotiations by carefully reviewing the cable-related needs of its constituent communities taking into account the costs associated with meeting those needs. The bulk of those cable-related needs were concerned with public, educational and government access and this fact is reflected in each proposed agreement commensurate with the demonstrated need in each community. However, in the conduct of the process other such needs were identified and these also are reflected in the proposed agreement.


State regulations specify certain minimum franchise standards. In particular, Section 895.3 of Public Service Commission cable television, rules states that “No municipality may award or renew an agreement which contains economic or regulatory burdens that when taken as a whole are greater or lesser than those burdens placed upon another cable television franchise operating in the same franchise area.” While much of the evaluation regarding level playing field awaits completion of the Cablevision renewals (whose underlying current franchises have nominally expired but are continued provisionally under temporary operating authorities granted by the PSC), the Consortium has negotiated the proposed agreement with Verizon giving particular attention to this important responsibility.


 


The Greenburgh area communities are on the cusp of a new competitive marketplace for cable television service. Obviously, the public hearing is a key stage in that process. Within 60 days of the municipality’s approval of the franchise, Verizon is required to file an application for a certificate of confirmation with the PSC. Upon release of an order granting the certificate, Verizon may then begin to provide cable service to the community.



Highlights


 The proposed franchise agreement with Verizon affords each municipality in the Consortium and its residents the maximum benefits reasonably achievable under the current cable television regulatory and business environment. In most cases, these benefits are quite liberal when compared with some contracts recently concluded in other jurisdictions. 


Term


 This agreement provides for a non-exclusive grant of ten (10) years. 


Service Obligations



Verizon is required to provide cable television service to all residents within five years. The sole exception to this commitment is a finding of economic infeasibility by the PSC, each and any incident of which must be filed for and demonstrated to the PSC’s satisfaction by Verizon. In most if not all cases, Verizon has or will indicate in its application that it has completed the construction of its Fiber to the Premises (FTTP) network to in excess of 90% of the households in each of the municipalities. Economic redlining is expressly prohibited. The vast majority of the residents in each community will have service available to them almost immediately following PSC certification.


Verizon is required to comply with all Federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to cable television service including the handling of requests for service, complaints and trouble calls, subscriber billing, termination of service for non-payment, system installation and repairs, subscriber credits and fee waivers, protection of subscriber privacy, technical performance and safety of the technical plant. While adequate safeguards exist within federal and state rules and the proposed agreement, it is expected that the imperatives of a competitive marketplace also will ensure the provision of superior customer service. Nonetheless, there is a procedure specified in the proposed agreement to effectively address deficiencies in this regard short of revocation of the franchise.


 Verizon must maintain its system using materials of good and durable quality and all work performed with respect to the system must be done in a safe, thorough and reliable manner. Verizon must comply with all local laws governing the right-of-way and the municipalities retain all rights regarding police powers. Verizon must comply with federal and state Emergency Alert System requirements. While Verizon is required to maintain a system with the minimum capacity of 860 MHz and 77 analog channels, it is expected that, in addition to the safeguards described in the proposed agreement, the imperatives imposed by a competitive marketplace will compel Verizon to regularly maintain and improve its system to meet the needs of its customers and in other communities currently being served has exceeded the minimum standards.



Franchise Fees


Verizon is required to annually pay, on a quarterly basis, a franchise fee of five percent (5%) based on “all revenue, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which is derived by Franchisee from the operation of the Cable System to provide Cable Service in the Service Area.”


Because the amount of the franchise fee collected from subscribers is included within the definition of gross revenue in the proposed agreement, the effective rate of the franchise fee obligation is 5.25%. Each payment must be accompanied by a report showing in detail the basis for the computation. The proposed agreement anticipates a marketing device known as “bundling” under which voice, internet and video programming (cable) services are offered at a discounted rate if the subscriber agrees to subscribe to all three in a package from the same company. If such  bundling occurs, Verizon has agreed not to allocate such discounts “for the purposes of evading the franchise fee”, and to “allocate the bundled discount such that the discount allocated to Cable Service revenues will not exceed the amount which would be allocated to Cable Service revenue on a pro rata basis”.


The municipality may audit any such payment for a period of up to three years after such payment is first made.



Public, Educational and Government Access Support


 Under the proposed agreement, Verizon agrees to make available three full time, dedicated Public, Educational and Government Access (PEG) channels on its cable system to be transmitted as part of its basic broadcast offering.


In addition to agreeing to provide, install and maintain, without cost to the municipality, the equipment for receiving a video signal feed from each municipality’s “master control” facility for distribution to the community at large, Verizon has agreed to provide live interconnection to the “master control” facility from up to three sites in each community.


If the underlying technology changes in such a manner as to render the existing connections inoperable or insufficient, Verizon has agreed to provide suitable upgrades and replacements, also at  no charge to the municipality.  Verizon also is required under the proposed agreement to make both an “Initial PEG Grant” and “Annual PEG Grants” to be used by the municipalities for capital costs associated with PEG access.


Within sixty (60) days of effective date of the proposed agreement, Verizon will pay to each municipality for the following “Initial PEG Grant”:


 


Ardsley                          $24,793


Greenburgh                    $88,843


Hastings-on-Hudson      $61,983


Irvington                        $33,058


Tarrytown                     $41,322


 The “Annual PEG Grant” is payable annually on the anniversary of the effective date of the proposed agreement. In order to ensure competitive neutrality, the amount due to each municipality is expressed as a monthly per-subscriber assessment as follows:



Ardsley                          $0.57


Greenburgh                    $0.60


Hastings-on-Hudson      $0.75


Irvington                        $0.55


Tarrytown                     $0.69


 Provisions are made within the proposed agreement for computational methodology.  Each annual payment is to be accompanied by a report explaining in sufficient detail how the payment was calculated and on what basis. Verizon also is given the option to defer the first payment of the “Annual PEG Grant” for a period not to exceed three years from the effective date of the proposed agreement or until such time as it has recovered from subscribers an amount equal to the Initial PEG Grant, whichever is earlier.


 The amounts associated with the “Annual PEG Grant” are contingent on each municipality requiring Cablevision, in any renewal agreement, to make “substantially equivalent PEG financial contributions”.  In the case of the “Initial PEG Grant,” if a municipality does not require Cablevision to provide substantially equivalent PEG contributions, then Verizon may offset against its franchise fee obligations to the municipality by the amount by which the Initial PEG Grant that it is required to pay exceeds the amount that Cablevision is required to pay. Consistent with federal law, Verizon is permitted but not required to pass  these costs on to subscribers and to identify them as a separate line-item on its billing.


 


Other Provisions


The proposed agreement requires Verizon to repair or replace and to restore to serviceable condition any municipal property damaged or destroyed in connection with its provision of cable service and to restore to its pre-existing condition any subscriber property damaged in connection with the installation, repair or disconnection of cable service 


Consistent with recent PSC orders, the proposed agreement provides that upon delivery of cable service, Verizon’s FTTP network becomes a “mixed use” facility subject to the PSC’s minimum cable television franchise standards and the police power of the municipality but that the municipality is not granted any broader authority over the construction, placement and operation of the mixed use facilities as a consequence of Verizon’s providing the municipality with cable service.


 


Free basic cable service will be provided to each public library and educational institution chartered or licensed by the state education department or Board of Regents, as well as other buildings used for municipal purposes.


 


Under the proposed agreement, the municipality has the right to inspect Verizon’s pertinent books and records and Verizon  will be required to maintain certain records for a period of three years.



There are insurance and indemnification requirements running to the benefit of the municipality.



The municipality retains the right to approve or deny transfers, consistent with the limitations imposed by federal law.



Verizon is prohibited from abandoning service, in whole or in part, without the written consent of the municipality.



Equal employment opportunity practices also are ensured under the proposed agreement.


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

City Hall Reports 100 WP Homes Still Out According to Con Edison

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. From The Mayor’s Office. August 3, 2006: David Maloney, press spokesperson for Mayor Joseph Delfino reports that as of 12:25 P.M., according to Con Edison there are 100 homes still without power in White Plains, in the most oppressive heat wave in White Plains memory, that are expected to be hooked up by Con Edison this afternoon.


Maloney said 27 homes on Murchison at Ridgeway, (Gedney Farms) without power since 6:45 P.M. were expected to be restored by 1 P.M.; 23 homes at Cedarwood and Redwood (Rosedale)reported out since 8:50 P.M. last night are expected to be reconnected  by 2 P.M.; 19 homes at Pinebrook Drive and Maple Moor (North Street) which lost power at 5:36 P.M. are expected to be back on  at 1 P.M., and 31 homes at Robertson Avenue and Tarrytown Road (Battle Hill) out since 1:30 A.M. today are projected to be restored by 3:32 P.M.


Maloney said earlier today he had received ten calls at the Mayor’s office complaining of lack of power who had not been able to reach Con Edison.  Maloney said the city had been told a feeder cable in Mamaroneck was responsible for the outage, but did not have a comment on reports from a Highlands resident that Con Edison personnel had personally told him circuit breaker failure caused the outages in their neighborhood Tuesday evening. Maloney earlier today urged residents to advise City Hall of outages.


A Con Edison spokesperson reporting 700 White Plains homes out at midnight Wednesday evening said circuit breaker failure could have been the cause, but a Con Edision laboratory investigation would have to determine the true cause.

Posted in Uncategorized

746 OUT. Reynal Park, Prospect Park Join Rolling Blackouts of White Plains

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. August 2, 2006: With the 11 o’clock temperature 88 degrees with 66% humidity (very icky)  a sweltering, fetid sweat sock of a night shrouds the county seat in stifling misery for those without power. A resident of Reynal Park reports that about 25% of her neighborhood is without power at this time, having gone out sometime between 8 P.M. and 10 P.M. She says she knows persons checking into hotels because they cannot stand the heat.


Joy Farber of Con Edison Media Relations reports to WPCNR as of 11 P.M. there are 746 customers without power in White Plains, in the  6,561 Westchester County residents without electricity at this time. Farber said the numbers of outages have “hit a spike” as people have returned to their residences.  If help is needed, the Mayor’s Office urges people to call the police at 422-6111


Asked whether the majority of outages in White Plains could be caused by circuit breakers on the wires blowing and causing a short circuit blacking out  vast blocks as happened last night in the Highlands, Farber said “that could have been a cause,” but actual causes would be determined until lines that fail were “autopsied” at Con Edison’s laboratory in The Bronx. Farber said she would try and find out. Farber said most of the outages were heat related. In a number of cases in the past,


WPCNR has asked the reason behind blackouts, and Con Edison has given the same answer that the laboratory has to investigate, however, results never seem to be announced of those investigations. The failure of the transformers in downtown White Plains two years ago where feeder cables melted, but why they melted was never explained.


 A “CitizeNetReporter” from the Highlands reports that Midchester Avenue — home to Councilman Benjamin Boykin–  has been out since 4 o’clock — and that the fire department was going house to house on that street, but did not know why. WPCNR has also learned that a portion of Prospect Park went “offline” at 4:30 this afternoon. A CitizeNetReporter also notes that there are other portions of the Highlands that have winked out.


The cause of the rolling blackouts tonight in White Plains is not known at this time.

Posted in Uncategorized

New Outages Reported Within Last Hour in WP

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. From WPCNR Reporters. August 2, 2006:  As of 4:30 P.M., WPCNR was told that Midchester Avenue has lost power in the Highlands, and is advised that Easton Avenue is out. Con Ed reported 24 White Plains homes “out” as of midday, another reader advises “My wife tells me power went off in last 2 hours on Soundview Circle. Neighbors also without power. I called Con Ed. They don’t seem to have an explanation. I wonder how widespread it is. Delightful.

Posted in Uncategorized

Con Edison Urges Conservation.

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. From The Mayor’s Office. August 2, 2006: As of 5 PM with the temperature steady at 95 degrees in the shade, and residents begin to return to their homes, when evening demand yesterday blew circuit breakers in the Highlands, the Mayor’s Office has released to WPCNR the following Con Edison statement:


“As a result of the record setting temperatures that continue in Westchester County today….


We continue to be fully mobilized for the current heat event and have brought in additional staffing at all levels, 24/7.


We are responding to local scattered outages in the county as a result of this excessive heat event


Con Edison set a new record for electric usage Tuesday, reaching 13,103 megawatts at 5 P.M. (Tuesday), which topped the new 13,059 megawatts the company set last year on July 27, 2005. The load forecast for today is significantly higher than for yesterday.


We urge all customers not to use any unnecessary electrical appliances and conserve energy during the current heat wave.


Electric supplies are sufficient to meet the projected demand for electricity this week, and company crews remain ready to respond to any power outage that may occur.


If customers do experience an outage, they should contact Con Edison by calling the 24-hour, toll free number at 1-800-75CONED.


Municipal concerns should continue to be addressed through normal channels.”


Con Edison requests:


“Turn off appliances when they are not needed. Set air conditioners at 78 degrees or higher. Use energy-intensive appliances like dishwashers, washing machines and dryers late at night, or early in the morning.”


 

Posted in Uncategorized