Hits: 0
WPCNR NEWS & COMMENT By John F. Bailey. July 10, 2011:
When County Legislator Bill Ryan of the recreation committee is asked point blank what is going to go into the Westchester Childrens Museum proposed for the Playland bathhouses, and he can’t give you an answer as to what if anything really historic or significant is going to go there, I as a voter have a problem with that.

Tomorrow the local law giving the Westchester Childrens Museum group a 10-year, $1 a year lease of the bathouses at Playland, in return for their paying approximately $7 Million for the County renovation of the bathouses, still mired in a contractual dispute, will be on the agenda for a quiet enactment, unless some legislators act responsibly..
This has been a loaded project from the start. Touted as being able to bring in $4 Million a year to the county in admissions by attracting parents to an indoor museum during the winter months (when nothing is going on at Playland except a lot of great ice-skating activity, you have to wonder what powerful professional do-gooders (and political contributors, perhaps) have a stake in this mystery boondoggle that is all for the kids.
The county legislators have not been asking the questions that really need answering. Why? Because they don’t want to think about it. But why am I not surprised, county legislators don’t think it is their job to think. It’s not their job.
They hear no evil. Speak no evil. See no evil. And ask no hard questions.
.
Childrens museums usually thrive in a destination location like Baltimore’s Inner Harbor…but they are not even museums for the most part.They are glorified exhibits of involving amusement.
For a county that does not even have their own Westchester County Museum of History (where the Board of Legislators could establish the Ken Jenkins legislators’ Hall of Fame, an Andrew J. O’Rourke County Executive’s Hall of Fame (or Infamy). Gee, maybe I should not have written that.
But, I digress.
Last week the county approved money for another park I have never heard of—yet the last two years we have been taking dead aim at killing a park – Playland – that is the largest employer of youth during the summer in the county – while killing attendance by raising fees that have resulted in a 40% drop in attendance this summer.
Excuse me, but I do not see the thinking here.
Now because some politically connected do-gooder types think a children’s museum would be a good idea, when they cannot tell us what is going in it? (They had every opportunity during the hearing on this issue last month, and did not.)
What will the themes will be, what will be the reason people will go there except general platitudes that this will be a wonderful thing for the county. I do not buy it.
Besides, as County Executive Robert Astorino points out – it is compromising the Playland proposals – and saddles any future developer with the albatross of the children’s museum.
But as I wrote last week – the hard questions are not being asked.
Will Playland even be open next year(depriving Westchester, The Bronx, Queens, Brooklyn, Manhattan and Connecticut a wholesome attraction)?

Will the Playland beach be open next year?
Will it be accessible to the public if some developer gets the prize parcel?
Will the splendid Playland pool (above) be open next year?
What is going into the “Mystery” Children’s Museum (maybe they’ll have a how government and private partnership works exhibit)? Beware the private partnership – another euphemism for deal remember finding the home for Westchester County Election Machines that resulted in a windfall for a political contributor to a previous county emperor?
When will the county ever finish redoing the art deco facade on the bathhouses? The bond company is in the process of finding another contractor, as of last week.
If a developer comes in, how much of the old Playland—the rides, boardwalk access, the docks will be preserved (what’s the commitment of this committee on this issue)?
More to the point, who will determine what rides, attractions are of enough historical significance to be saved, preserved improved?
Why has the county executive and the county legislature put in an admissions policy apparently calculated to lower attendance, not raise attendance? (Because that is what their policy is resulting in,)
When will details of all the proposals be divulged in detail?
When I wrote a column on this last week, it was out of the blue. I did not know the actual committee on Playland was holding a meeting on their preliminary report which they did not make public that day. And surprise! They did not make the preliminary report public! Come on. Who’s going to be making big money on this project? Is the committee already committed to the chldren’s museum? You bet it is.
My questions continue:
How long will the selected developer and the Chidren’s Museum be given to develop the property? The Children Museum has two years from the lease agreement to develop the property. Lots of luck.
They have not raised the extra cash to build the interior of the museum yet. If they do not have it in hand right now? (They have money for their share of the renovation, and say they can raise the museum construction …trust us.)
Well, maybe the tightwad banks of choice in Westchester will lend them the money? Fundraising is getting killed this year. Where are the contributions going to come from?
Another issue:
Will Playland remain open next season if it continues its dismal attendance trend? Will it be functioning while the developer the county chooses, develops?
How long will Playland be closed, if it is closed while the developer develops?
How much county money will given the developer picked to do the property over? And how much money will the county lend or grant outright to the children’s museum people if they can’t raise the bucks to furnish the exhibits?
Will the county have an approval in the theme of the exhibits in the museum?
Will County dollars put into redevelopment cost of Playland, if any county dollars are planned, amount to far more than it costs to run the park now as it is? This Board of Legislators has to be the most short-sighted, naïve group of legislators – but wait – I think the White Plains Common Council is in a tie.
How is the Playland developer and the Children’s Museum going to get the financing if needed, in this market? Connections maybe? With the banks?
Will the developer selected be allowed to clear the old Playland structures before they get financing? This is very key. Will they be forced to operate it while developing? Can that be done given dangers of construction?
How expensive will be the admission price of the new facility be whatever it is going to be to get into?
If the cost of admission is less than the present policy, then you know the county wanted to kill this wonderful magic place all along.
Why aren’t our County Legislators asking these questions? Can they think more than one veto in advance?
Playland is priceless.
Everybody has fun there of all races, ages, and creeds.
All that will be left after the Museum deal and the developer deal is done will be the memories.
Just because the white elite in this county don’t like hispanic, black, asian people from The Bronx, Manhattan and Queens coming to Playland, does not mean we should shut them out by raising the admissions bar. Come on, Robert Moses, the father of parks built parks with all the people in mind.
County Executive Astorino will have the ignominious distinction of being the man who made the deal that resulted in the destruction of the last amusement park of old-time vintage in the country.
Because unless the developer is forced to keep Playland open while they construct — something no developer wants to do — Playland will be just a memory for the years it will take to redo a park.
Can’t our team of blind mice see that?
Go and enjoy this park the rest of this summer, folks because it may not be there at all next year to enjoy.
It will go the way of Palisades Park, Luna Park, FreedomLand.
Go out and ride the Kiddyland train once more, and the original carousel. That’s what they’re going to kill.
Joy.