FASNY FIGHTING IS DAVID VS. GOLIATH: MISSING FINANCING BRINGS ABILITY TO EXECUTE PLAN INTO QUESTION

Hits: 136

WPCNR LETTER TICKER. August 13, 2014:

DAVID vs. GOLIATH

THE BATTLE CONTINUES

Over the course of the last three years, I have written many letters to you, Mayor Roach and Common Council members, voicing my opposition to the French-American School of New York’s proposed project.  One of my letters referred to the events unfolding as a David vs. Goliath battle.

That analogy still applies because this is not a level playing field and never has been.  FASNY has an army of consultants, lawyers, and public relations personnel as part of its team.  Despite this array, the opposition is resolute, has fought back hard, and has gained the support of a broad cross section of White Plains residents.  The more that is revealed about the FASNY project, the more the opposition grows.

From FASNY’s very first plan, shown at a presentation by the Gedney Association on 1/06/11, the proposed project has morphed and expanded until it has reached the current size of 261,200 sq. feet on a 53.2-acre campus.

Like “The Blob,” in the classic Steve McQueen horror movie, the project has been spreading and devouring the former Ridgeway Country Club. Looking at the plan shown at that January meeting is surreal, because by 1/29/11, at an open house, FASNY presented a plan so different and so much larger, that it seemed like slight of hand. See http://whiteplainsusa.com/ridgeway01.htm   The first plan appears practically benign in comparison to the current monster.

Following the Finding Statement, which called for reduced student enrollment from 1,200 to 950, FASNY did something completely counterintuitive in its Special Permit/Site Plan Application submitted 5/21/14.  It did not decrease the size of the proposed buildings.

It increased the size by 30,337 sq. ft.  Why is this latest increase necessary?  The explanations offered by the FASNY team at the 7/15/14 Planning Board meeting do not pass the smell test.  The only logical explanation is that, if allowed to build the school, at some future date, FASNY will return to the Common Council to ask for an increase in enrollment to the original 1,200, or perhaps even more.

Vintage French Whine

At the same Planning Board meeting, FASNY representatives mentioned the enormous cost of constructing bicycle paths and the 3,000 foot access road from North St.  Cost was an attraction when FASNY bought the Ridgeway Country Club property at a fire sale price because the club was close to bankruptcy.

With the club a financial ruin, FASNY thought it could roll into Gedney Farms and be welcomed like General Charles de Gaulle when Paris was liberated in World War II.  Funny thing about that — expectations are often greater than the outcome.  FASNY embarked on its journey by buying the property at record speed and without the necessary due diligence.  That this ignorance about the environmentally sensitive property it bought, and its residential location, is now causing FASNY financial indigestion, is solely FASNY’s problem, not White Plains’ problem.  Caveat Emptor!

Funding is cited as a reason why some of the earlier construction plans for Phase I, proposed to begin in the fall of 2014, will be delayed until Phase II, which is scheduled to be completed no later than 2025.  This incredibly long time frame, to which Gedney Farms residents will be subjected, is due to FASNY’s need to replenish its finances between Phases.

Previously, when FASNY’s ability to pay for the entire project was questioned, FASNY blew off the concern, saying that as a non-profit, it did not have to provide financials.

Because of this refusal to reveal whether it was financially sound, FASNY continued unimpeded and we now face the possibility that once started, financial deficits could result in the inability of FASNY to complete the proposed project.  This would be a disaster for White Plains, Gedney Farms and, of course, FASNY.

Despite the fact that FASNY has obtained a $60 million dollar loan guarantee from the French Government, that sum is not enough money to complete the bloated project.  FASNY needs at least another $20 million and possibly more. At this point, it has only raised $3.5 million, which is far below its needs.

That explains why it is searching for a Director of Development, whose main job will be fund raising.  FASNY will no doubt be very aggressive in this pursuit.  Since financing the entire project appears to be a serious problem, wouldn’t a reduction in the size of the buildings to reflect the lower enrollment, help alleviate the money issue?   Increasing the square footage is illogical.

Money is also cited as a cause for possible delays in implementing Stage II of the proposed Conservancy restoration.  FASNY previously stated, and continues to state, that a number of its “aspirational” plans will have to wait for funding as well as approvals from NYSDEC and the City of White Plains.

The funding may never arrive, and I don’t see how the Common Council can force FASNY to raise the funds for Stage II.  It is also possible that the needed approvals may not be granted.  Reaching into a bag of fairy dust and sprinkling it around will not result in aspirations being realized.  Stage II could be put on the back burner permanently.

The Conservancy Master Plan spells out Stage 2 Implementation on page 14, and is shown below.

“The following elements of the Conservancy may be implemented over time as funding becomes available:

.  Wetland habitat restoration adjacent to the large pond and in the southeastern corner of Parcel D, subject to grant funding and NYSDEC permitting.

.  Stream restoration on Parcel C and on Parcel D conducted in coordination with any wetland habitat restoration and subject to grant funding and potential NYSDEC permitting.

.  Construction of an observation deck and/or pier in the large pond could be pursued subject to available funding and NYSDEC and City of White Plains permitting.  FASNY believes that the observation deck and/or pier would be an opportunity to enhance the educational value of the large pond and associated wetlands.

.  Construction of a wetland boardwalk and outlook for educational interpretation of the wetland covering the southeastern portion of Parcel D could be pursued subject to available funding and NYSDEC and City of White Plains permitting.  FASNY believes that a wetland boardwalk and outlook area would be an opportunity to enhance the educational value of the forested wetlands area.

Construction of a propagation greenhouse on Parcel D.

.  Construction of a shade structure on Parcel D.”

All the stipulations in this section of the Conservancy Master Plan give FASNY the perfect excuse not to fulfill its “aspirational” promises.

A Neighborhood in Jeopardy

The one thing about the FASNY project that has not changed from the outset is that it is still the wrong project in the wrong place.  Here are some of the reasons:

.   It so obviously does not fit in with the character of the neighborhood.

.   It will exacerbate traffic on the North St. corridor and still bring traffic to Ridgeway.

.   Our own students’ safety will be compromised by this traffic.

.   Its outsize plan will harm fragile and environmentally sensitive land.

.   Its economic benefits are vastly overstated.

.   It will contribute to an increase in real estate taxes because FASNY is tax-exempt.

.   It is already harming property values in Gedney Farms.

.   The majority of Gedney Farms and its neighbors in southern White Plains are dead set

against the proposed project.

 

This litany of reasons should make you realize that the requested Special Permits must be denied.  To do otherwise would leave the leaders of this City’s government with the unwelcome legacy of having presided over irreparable damage to historic Gedney Farms.

 

Respectfully,

Ellen Alzerez

August 11, 2014

 

Posted in Uncategorized

If you find a bat in your home. Capture it for testing. Here’s How. Bat population UP

Hits: 128

 

bat-in-livingroom-blinds

Typical local bat asleep in a venetian blind.

 WPCNR HEALTH ISSUE. From the Westchester County Department of Health. August 14, 2014:

Bats are back, making their way into Westchester homes this month, and the Westchester County Health Department wants residents to know what to do if these unwelcome visitors drop in.

“We’d like everyone to catch the bat,” said Health Commissioner Sherlita Amler, MD. “Most of the time, the bats tested are not rabid, so you and your family can be spared unneeded treatment. But rabies is fatal, so without the bat to test, you will most likely have to get rabies shots.”

During the first week in August, 43 bats were brought to the health department for testing because they were found in a home. Since none of those bats tested positive for rabies, none of these residents had to be treated preventively for rabies. However, so far this month, 17 people who were exposed to a bat but did not catch it for testing had to begin preventive treatment for rabies.

There is a better way. If you find a bat in your home, don’t panic and never let the bat fly out the window. To learn how to safely capture a bat in your home, watch the video on the health department website at www.westchestergov.com/health. If there’s a chance that a person or pet in your house had contact with the bat, catch that bat and call the health department at 914-813-5000 to arrange to have it tested for rabies.

For those who capture the bat, 97 percent of the bats tested do not have rabies, so those residents are spared the series of rabies shots. As long as the bat is not rabid, no one will need rabies shots. But if the bat is rabid, a series of life-saving vaccines must begin soon.

For each of the past five years, about 148 Westchester residents have required rabies treatment after being exposed to bats that could not be caught for testing.  In most cases, treatment could have been avoided if the bat had been caught and tested for rabies. Whenever a bat is found in a room with a sleeping or mentally impaired person or with a young child or pet, contact with the bat must be suspected and it is essential to call the Westchester County Health Department at (914) 813-5000.

Here’s how to safely catch a bat:

1.       Close windows and doors so the bat cannot escape.

 

2014813bat 001

2.       Wear thick gloves and grab a container (such as a coffee can), a piece of cardboard and some tape.

3.       Wait until the bat has settled on a wall.

4.       Place the container over the bat, trapping it against the wall.

5.       Slide the cardboard between the wall and container to trap the bat inside.

6.       Tape the cardboard to the container

7.       It’s critical to keep it on ice in a cooler or double-bag it and place it in the freezer.

8.       Call the Health Department at (914) 813-5000 for advice on submitting the bat for testing.

It’s also a good idea to learn how to bat-proof your home, by adding screens to your eaves and attic openings. Another favorite place for bats to hang out is inside your closed patio umbrella, so beware when you open it.

From 1995 to 2011, 49 people died of rabies in the U.S; 35 of them had been exposed to bats, according to the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention.

For more information on rabies, Like us at www.Facebook.com/wchealthdept, Follow us on Twitter @wchealthdept, call the Westchester County Health Department at (914) 813-5000, or visit our website at www.westchestergov.com/health.

         

Posted in Uncategorized

LCOR Ready to Start 55 Bank Street.

Hits: 120

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. August 13, 2014:

The Common Council has called a Special Meeting this afternoon at 5 P.M. to schedule a public hearing for the September 2 regularly scheduled Council meeting to present a second amendment to the contract for the sale, WPCNR believes, of the commuter parking lot that LCOR had agreed to purchase for $15 Million 7 years ago upon which would be transormed into a hotel and apartment/retail complex.   It is unclear whether the hotel is still part of the project.

John Martin, Common Council President, told WPCNR this morning when asked if this was an indication that, after seven years, LCOR is preparing to start the project, Martin said the hearing is strictly a formality so that the project would go ahead as soon as possible.

LCOR payments on the commuter parking lot have been suspended since 2008 when LCOR asked the city to suspend payments until such time as when LCOR could actually begin construction.

The LCOR project is the third project this year that was originally approved for construction seven years ago, but was prevented by  the economic recession effects on the market. The other two projects were the Winbrook Revitalization, which began this year, and the Maple Avenue and DeKalb apartments.

Posted in Uncategorized

Parents of Disabled Ask Cuomo to Remember Needed Housing for the Disabled.

Hits: 101

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. August 12. 2014:  

Be a voice for people with developmental disabilities.

Please sign the  petition urging Governor Cuomo to address the issue of long term residential planning and choice for people with Developmental Disabilities by including funding  in the NYS 2015-2016 budget for residential development for those living with their families in the community and in need of a 24 hr supervised setting,

One minute of your time can make a positive change in the lives of our children. Go to WWW.BronxDDCouncil.org.< http://www.bronxddcouncil.org/>  Protect the rights of people with developmental disabilities and sign.

Thank You

Mary Bonsignore
bronxmomsquad@aol.com<mailto: bronxmomsquad@aol.com>

Cheryelle Cruickshank, MA /  Associate Executive Director
Unique People Services – Admin Office

Posted in Uncategorized

Why Won’t Mayor Move September 8 Hearing to a Larger Venue?

Hits: 156

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. August 12, 2014 (The following letter to the Mayor was shared with WPCNR)

Hi Mr. Bailey,
I am forwarding you this email I sent to City Hall.  It’s a very strange thing that the Mayor refuses to move the venue to a larger setting.  What is he afraid of?  I think honestly, he is afraid that he is unable to handle the crowd at a larger venue.  As it is now, he scolds citizens to be “professional” during the hearings.  What’s “professional” about defending your neighborhood and city?
Thank you,
Anne M. Casey, M.D.

Begin forwarded message:
Dear Mayor Roach and Council Members,

I have written before requesting a venue change for the last public hearing on September 8, 2014.  As you well know, there is enormous public interest in the FASNY site plan and special permit vote.  There is precedent in White Plains for moving the venue from the confined Common Council chambers in City Hall to a more appropriate, larger venue.

The hearings were moved by Mayor DelVecchio to White Plains High School when the New York Hospital development was being reviewed.   Section 103(D) of the New York State Open Meeting’s specifically states:“Public bodies shall make or cause to be made all reasonable efforts to ensure that meetings are held in an appropriate facility which can adequately accommodate members of the public who wish to attend such meetings”.

While the present seating outside the chamber and in the lobby may technically fulfill the requirement of the law it misses the mark as far as the spirit of the law is concerned.  Voters want to attend and have their voices heard on this vital matter.

We elected you to represent us.  The voters want a change of venue.

This is a totally discretionary decision on your part.  Why are you turning a deaf ear to your constituents?  You will see that it is not a “small vocal minority” that opposes this feckless FASNY development.  Rather there is broad support opposing FASNY as evidenced by the thousands of White Plains citizens who signed real hard-copy petitions to this effect.  As someone who walked and petitioned throughout White Plains, each signature was a conversation.  The more people found out about FASNY,  the more opposed they became.

I am imploring you to listen to your constituents and move the September 8, 2014 public hearing to the White Plains High School.

Thank you,

Anne M. Casey, M.D.

 

Posted in Uncategorized

So long, Baby.

Hits: 150

the-big-sleep-bacall-publicity-shot

The Look

To_Have_and_Have_Not-DVD-R1-01347

“You know you don’t have to act with me, Steve. You don’t have to say anything, and you don’t have to do anything. Not a thing. Oh, maybe just whistle. You know how to whistle, don’t you, Steve? You just put your lips together and… blow.
Bacall as Slim to Bogey in To Have and Have Not (1944)

WPCNR DEPARTURES. By John F. Bailey. A remembrance. August 12, 2014:

Tinseltown nicknamed her “The Look.”

“The Look”   made Howard Hawks, the producer sign her to a contract at 18 after seeing her face on the cover of Harper’s Bazaar.

I first saw The Big Sleep in the early sixties or late ’50s on a late night movie. She was my first screen crush. I modeled myself after Bogart. The Bacall attitude,  the product of great script writers who included Wiliam Faulkner, she had the moxie, “that thing”  that Cole Porter wrote about, that made  lines live and you believed her hook, line and sinker.

Like all great stars  she was a star from the first and played herself in every movie. That’s what we wanted.

Her movies with Bogart (whom she fell in love with) are classics that still capture the timelessness of attraction between man and woman. Their focus on each other electrified their scenes together. Men wanted to be Bogart.Women wanted to be Bacall.

They said all the right things. You and I need writers to give us those great things to say.

Building her own personna on a model for the tough savvy woman, first created as a Hollywood type by Jean Harlow, Katherine Hepburn, Claudette Colbert, and Myrna Loy, she brought that style to another level uniquely her own:

She was not scatterbrain or calculating, (the way strong women were portrayed to be accepted before Bacall), but sophisticated, classy,  educated, with an appreciation for a man’s man, who had to meet standards to win her interest. She was pretentious and unpretentious at the same time.

She wasn’t a slummer. Didn’t fall for bad boys. To parapharase a line from a Bogey classic movie she was not in, The Maltese Falcon:

“She was the stuff dreams are made of.”

Her voice was low and smoky as the seductive cigarette spirals backlit in her closeups.

No woman or man ever smoked cigarettes better together than Lauren Bacall and Humphrey Bogart.

When she pretended to be weak, I thought it was just an act to give the Bogart character something to do.  I felt if she wanted to, she’d slug the bad guy and deck him. When she lied in a role, she looked so contrite. Well, you forgave her.

She had the best pout in the movies.

So regretful. A lower lip you wanted to kiss. A sullen smoulder without botox.  Her screen kisses,  I swear you could feel.

Her eyes showed  knowing, an “I see right through you, bud.”

Eyes drew you in. A depth that could hold your interest. Her gaze said substance. A softness that melted anger. A temper you loved. Or at least the scripts did.

She also had great lines:  “You know how to whistle, Steve. You just put your lips together and just blow,” (one of the hottest scenes with all clothes on you will see on film in To Have and Have Not.)

In The Big Sleep with Bogart playing Philip Marlowe and Bacall playing Vivian Rutledge (the best client ever to walk into a private detective’s office and sit on his desk–see picture above) we get this saucy sequence:

Bacall: “…speaking of horses, I like to play them myself. But I like to see them work out a little first. See if they’re front-runners or come from behind… I’d say you don’t like to be rated. You like to get out in front, open up a lead, take a little breather in the back stretch, and then come home free….”

Bogart:“You’ve got a touch of class, but I don’t know how far you can go.”

Bacall:“A lot depends on who’s in the saddle.”

You can read the stats: Two Tony Awards, a special Oscar. Her biography. But, she was one of a kind from the start. She worked hard, auditioned countless times. Modeled in the garment district. Ate date-nut bread with cream cheese sandwiches at Chock Full O’ Nuts. Ushered at theatres. Was strongly supported by her mother in anything she did or wanted to do. Her toughness personna in the movies was formed on the streets, stages and audition stages of New York. She came by it with hard work. She wrote her own autobiography without a ghost writer, (By Myself and Then Some), which is a wonderful read and from the heart, I recommend it.

 She raised three children.

She and Bogart were the toast of Hollywood. They were nicknamed Bogey and Baby. A classic romance.

In the New York Times obituary of Ms. Bacall this morning they include a classic Bacall line. She was frank and outspoken and said it this sounds like a line she might have said in the movies, but it is pure Lauren Bacall:

“You just learn to cope with whatever you have to cope with in. I spent my childhood in New York riding on subways and buses. And you know what you learn if you’re a New Yorker? The world doesn’t owe you a damn thing.”

Bogey is the ultimate  Bacall expert:

“She’s a regular Joe. You’ll fall in love with her like everybody else.”

Lauren Bacall died Tuesday In New York City. She was 89.

Posted in Uncategorized

Business Council of Westchester Supports Governor’s Selection of Development Projects

Hits: 146

WPCNR DEVELOPMENT DAILY. From the Business Council of Westchester. August 12,  2014:

 Marsha Gordon, President and CEO of The Business Council of Westchester, today expressed her support for 25 projects – including several key ones in Westchester County — deemed as regional priorities by the Mid-Hudson Regional Economic Development Council (MHREDC). As a member of the MHREDC, Gordon played a critical role in choosing the region’s priorities.

The regional projects are for consideration for Round IV of Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s Regional Council initiative. If awarded funding this fall, the projects have the potential to generate over $600 million in economic activity and the potential to create and retain more than 3,500 full-time jobs as well as create 3,700 construction jobs in the Mid-Hudson Region, which includes Sullivan, Ulster, Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland and Westchester counties.

“The priority projects selected represent great opportunities for economic transformation in the Hudson Valley,” Gordon said. “We are especially pleased to see a diversity of projects, representing small business, infrastructure development in our urban centers, mixed use waterfront development, new tourism initiatives and a growing cluster in micro-brewing, which is also a boon to our agriculture and manufacturing sectors.”

Westchester projects include funds for a mixed-use development with commercial space, parking and 400 rental units aimed at revitalizing downtown Yonkers and its waterfront; building a 6,500 square foot waterfront restaurant as part of a larger $65 million mixed-use development along the Ossining waterfront; “daylighting” additional sections (Phase III) of the Saw Mill River in Yonkers; developing a historic museum at Sing Sing Prison; creating a revolving loan fund — a Hudson Valley Opportunity Fund – targeting minority, women and veteran owned small business and social enterprises; and designation of a New York Medical College Biotechnology Incubator to help biotechnology start-ups and emerging firms, among others.

A complete list of the MHREDC’s priorities can be found here.

The Governor has directed up to $750 million in State resources to be made available in 2014 to support the economic development priorities of all 10 regions and spur job creation across the state, including $220 million in competitive funds from Empire State Development.

In the first three rounds of the Regional Council initiative, the Mid-Hudson region was awarded $219.4 million in state support for 232 projects across the region.

Posted in Uncategorized

SCHOOLMASTERING THE COMMON COUNCIL AND THE CITY LEGAL TEAM ON GROUNDS FOR THE SPECIAL PERMIT IN THE R1-30 ZONE

Hits: 138

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. August 12, 2014 (The following letter was sent to the White Plains Mayor and Common Council and was shared with WPCNR:)

Dear Mayor and Common Council:

In our last email we mentioned how our big picture question “Why and how does this 53-acre construction project fit next to single family homes sitting on 1/3 and 1/2 acres in a residential neighborhood?. . .was never discussed in FASNY’s Environmental Analysis section of their Site Plan Submission.
 
Also in this same Site Plan Submission in the Cover Letter page 8 we found that FASNY is claiming that they are eligible for a Special Permit. . .
Please see:        http://johnmeyerconsulting.com/fasny/site-plan-special-permit-submission/
 
Unfortunately FASNY’s statement is not supported by the facts.  If anyone past or present has told the Common Council that you have to grant a Special Permit to a school. . .they really should have said it depends on the type of school. . . yes, a “public school” would be eligible. . .however,  a “private regional school campus” is not eligible for a Special Permit. 
Please see:         http://www.cityofwhiteplains.com/DocumentCenter/View/619
When you look over Section 5.2 List of Use Regulations for District R1-30 zoning you will find that:
→  One family dwelling is a “permitted use”                                                                                                                                                                     →  Churches or other places of worship are a “permitted use”                                                                                                              →  Public schools are a “permitted use
However:                                                                                                                                                                                                            →  Private secondary or elementary schools require a “special permit” (note the word “or”)
→  Independent unaffiliated “nursery schools” or day care centers” located with a permitted church, other place of worship, “membership club” or “public school” or “private secondary or elementary school”  (again note all of the times the word “or” is used)
FASNY defines itself as a “regional school campus” and this list of permitted uses and special permits are pretty specific with regard to the word “or” and a “regional school campus” is not mentioned anywhere and was never an intended activity either for R1-30 zoning or in the WP Comprehensive plan.
 
→  One family houses and public schools would be a permitted use in our R1-30 residential zoned neighborhood. . .however a “regional school campus” is not an allowable use for a Special Permit under the City’s Zoning Ordinance. . .contrary to what FASNY is stating on page 8 of their Site Plan Cover Letter.
 
→  And FASNY’s Conservancy would not be eligible for a Special Permit by Section 5.2 regulations.
Based on all the voluminous documents that FASNY has submitted, where we now know more about FASNY than any of the schools our own children have ever attended,  . .it would seem that FASNY would fit best in the City’s zoning designation titled “Campus Office” for its 53-acre combined nursery, elementary, middle and high school.
Of course that means FASNY would never fit within the R1-30 residential district of our neighborhood. . .however the “Campus Office (CO)” designation would allow for FASNY’s campus to be located in the Westchester Avenue/287 corridor where there are ample roadways to handle their volume of Vehicle Trips.
 
→  FASNY’s “regional school campus” not only doesn’t fit next to Gedney Farms private residences on 1/3 and 1/2 acre based on Character. . .it doesn’t fit by the City’s own Zoning, Comprehensive Plan and Special Permits regulations. . .and FASNY’s “regional school campus” is not permitted by law according to Section 5.2 of the WP zoning.
Our hindsight question. . .back 3 years ago if the City had other applicants wanting to build here in our residential neighborhood on 53 acres with 261,200 sq ft of buildings. . .and like FASNY which were not permitted under R1-30 Special Permits. . .for example if IBM wanted to construct an office and factory, if Marriott requested a hotel and conference center or let’s say someone else wanted a large scale detox treatment center. . .all the same building size as FASNY’s. . .would each of these review processes have dragged on for 3+ years like FASNY’s or would each of these projects have been killed early on in the review process by the City?
 
The bottom line is all of these other possible projects like FASNY. . .just would not fit. . .and are not allowed by WP regulations.
Would you consider FASNY’s statement that they have to be granted a Special Permit. . .more Spin, a misstatement?
We report. . .you decide.
Your Truth Police, Team Rhodes
Marie and Ron Rhodes
Posted in Uncategorized

WHITE PLAINS WEEK AND MIRIAM FLISSER ON SCARSDALE REVAL ON PEOPLE TO BE HEARD ON THE INTERNET NOW.

Hits: 124

WhitePlainsWeekkeysign

2014801rhodes 004

KATZ

2014628govislandtapzeewp 086

BENEROFE

photo

BAILEY

ON

IRAQ WAR RESTART

FASNY RIDES AGAIN

THE NEW MYSTERIOUS CON ED CAPACITY CHARGE 

WHITE PLAINS PROPERTIES WORTH SAVING FOR THEIR HERITAGE–THE LIST.

THE 25% WHITE PLAINS OFFICE VACANCY RATE.

AND ON

PEOPLE TO BE HEARD

THE COUNTY’S MOST RELEVANT INTERVIEW–

“WHERE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, HAVE THEIR SAY”

YOU’VE GOT

REVAL ON THE GROUND

MIRIAM FLISSER, CANDIDATE FOR HARRISON, SCARSADLE AND WHITE PLAINS COUNTUY LEGISLATURE DISTRICT 5 DISCUSSES THE ISSUES WITH JOHN BAILEY AND JIM BENEROFE
MIRIAM FLISSER, MAYOR WHO ORIGINATED THE SCARSDALE REAL ESTATE REVALUATION ON WHAT TO EXPECT 

MIRIAM LEAVITT-FLISSER

ON THE SCARSDALE REVAL

WHAT IT MEANS TO BE REVALUED AND WHAT HAPPENS

ISSUES WHITE PLAINS MUST CONSIDER IN ANY REVAL  AND MORE

Posted in Uncategorized