WHITE PLAINS WEEK NOW ON THE INTERNET AND TONIGHT 7:30 ON THE FASNY DENIAL–EXCLUSIVE WPW VIDEO — ON THE INTERNET NOW AND TONIGHT AT 7:30 ON FIOS CH. 45, CABLEVISION CH. 76

Hits: 76

 

WhitePlainsWeekkeysign

2015327wpw 010RKOTower

WHITE PLAINS WEEK TRUTH AROUND THE WORLD

HERE WE GO!

ON THE FASNY TURN DOWN

THE FASNY LAWSUIT THREATS

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO

THE SURPRISE CALL FOR COMPANY TO DEVELOP STRATEGIC PLAN FOR TRAIN STATION

THE STATE SALES TAXES $$ SOFTEN SIGNIFICANTLY–COMPTROLLER

BUCHWALD ANNOUNCES NEW FUNDING FROM STATE FOR WESTCHESTER RIVERS, LAKES  REPAIR AND CLEASNING

AND

A FASNY COVERAGE

EXCLUSIVE!

JOHN SHEEHAN

PRESIDENT OF THE GEDNEY ASSOCIATION

ON

WHAT THE  HATHAWAY LANE DENIAL MEANS

WHAT’S NEXT?

WHY HE THINKS IT WILL HOLD UP IN COURT

KATZ AND BAILEY INTERVIEW SHEEHAN

NOW AT

www.whiteplainsweek.com

2014613sheehan 007

JOHN SHEEHAN, CENTER IN A PREVIOUS APPEARANCE ON PEOPLE TO BE HEARD…APPEARS AGAIN ON WESTCHESTER COUNTY’S MOST RELEVANT INTERVIEW PROGRAM “PEOPLE TO BE HEARD” SEE  THE INTERVIEW RECORDED IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE FASNY DENIAL BY THE COMMON COUNCIL.

Posted in Uncategorized

70 Years Ago Yesterday — The Atomic Bomb Was Dropped on Hiroshima

Hits: 102

WPCNR OBSERVATIONS. August 6, 2015:

Seventy years ago in 1945, the Enola Gay, a single American bomber dropped an Atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan.

The terrible effects of that single bomb are a horror that has never been repeated

A second bomber, Bock’s Car on August 9, dropped another atomic bomb on Nagasaki.

Unknown thousands of Japanese citizens’ lives were vaporized, burned,  and maimed and two cities leveled to the ground in an instant in both bombings.

To grasp what one atomic bomb did to Nagasaki. Readers may see the photographs Japanese photographer Yosuki Yamato took of the aftermath of Nagasaki the day it happened at http://www.exploratorium.edu/nagasaki/photos.html#journey/63.jpg

The decision to drop the bombs was made after the United States, Great Britain and the Republic of China demanded Japan  surrender in the Potsdam Declaration on July 26 or face  “prompt and utter destruction”.

The Japanese government did not surrender.

The United States deployed two nuclear weapons  dropping one on Hiroshimi, 70 years ago yesterday and one on Nagasaki on August 9.

Over four months the bombs resulted in the deaths of   90,000–166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000–80,000 in Nagasaki, half dying the day the bombs fell.

The Hiroshima prefecture health department estimated that, of the people who died on the day of the explosion, 60% died from flash or flame burns, 30% from falling debris and 10% from other causes. During the following months, large numbers died from the effect of burns, radiation sickness, and other injuries, compounded by illness.

In a US estimate of the total immediate and short term cause of death, 15–20% died from radiation sickness, 20–30% from burns, and 50–60% from other injuries, compounded by illness. In both cities, most of the dead were civilians, although Hiroshima had a sizeable garrison.

The horror of those two bombings and the aftermath, the injuries created have resulted in an effort and reluctance on the part of nuclear-armed powers to avoid any nuclear attacks since that date.

Within a few days of those bombings, Japan surrendered unconditionally, officially ending World War II.

The decision to use the bombs by the United States has long been debated. A dialogue on what the bombs did, why the decision was made was collected in 1995, the fiftieth year since the bombings. It is available at http://www.exploratorium.edu/nagasaki/commentary/decision.html

Posted in Uncategorized

CLOSURE OF HATHAWAY LANE REJECTED. FASNY SITE PLAN TABLED. FASNY VOWS LAWSUIT IN MILLIONS.

Hits: 83

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey.  AUGUST 5, 2015:

Four and a half years of review of the French American School of New York plan to build a regional campus on the site of the former Ridgeway Country Club ended last night in defeat for the school temporarily, at least, pending a promised lawsuit by the school to reverse the decision.

With Councilpersons Nadine Hunt-Robinson, Dennis Krolian and Milogros Lecuona voting against the closure of Hathway Lane, countering the yes votes of John Kirkpatrick, John Martin, Beth Smayda and Mayor Roach, resulting in a 4-3 in favor vote on the Hathaway Lane Closure measure  (required to proceed with the FASNY site plan, the second item before the council tonight), the council vote falling one vote short of the 5-2 super majority needed to close the street.

2015805fasny 052

Councilperson Nadine Hunt-Robinson third from foreground, signaled she had not changed her mind. Councilperson Beth Smayda second from front and John Martin, front, both supported the closure; Martin fearing what restrictions a possible unfavorable court decision would impose on the city.

That one vote shy was provided right at the beginning of the proceedings about 5 past 7 when Councilperson Nadine Hunt-Robinson,(appointed by Mayor Roach and the Common Council to replace Benjamin Boykin in January, 2014, was elected in 2014 to complete Boykin’s term and is up for election for  a four-term this November), began her comments on the Hathaway Lane closure, the first item for voting.

There was no suspence.
Hunt-Robinson and John Martin were the only councilpersons in June to express new concerns on the Hathaway Lane closure measure. If either one stuck to their guns the closure was doomed.

It was.

Hunt-Robinson read her prepared statement praised the work of FASNY, the city consultants and staff, and the arguments made in favor of closing Hathaway, but she said she was very concerned about emergency response times that she said the Department of Public Safety had said would suffer due to road closure, and for that reason, she would vote “no” on the project, echoing her comments made June 29. Apparently all the city’s lawyers and consultants and Mayor’s men and women could not convince her otherwise (if they attempted to do so) in the last 36 days since her June 29 surprise.

Councilperson Beth Smayda said she voted in favor the environmental findings statement in December 13 and would vote yes on the Hathaway Lane closure as did long supporter of the project, Councilperson John Kirkpatrick.

2015805fasny 050

Milagros Lecuona, opposed to the project from the start due to what she described as a flawed plan, echoed that sentiment again, and said any decision had to be based on what is right for the persons in the community which she said should be any counilperson’s guiding principle.

2015805fasny 051

Dennis Krolian based his intention to vote no on the recent Cornell decision where a judge decided that a school could be denied if the community thought it would create unsafe conditions for the public.

Milagros Lecouna and Dennis Krolian back to back were next to speak and each reiterated their positions to vote “no” on the Hathaway Lane closure. Lecouna for safety reasons and Krolian basing his reasoning on the recent court case decision 

The die was cast. There would be no approval of the FASNY campus. Council President John Martin said though he had expressed doubts on the Hathaway Lane closure, he would vote Yes because of the uncertain nature of what a court would order White Plains to allow if the court decided in favor of FASNY in any lawsuit.

The Mayor also voted “Yes” and said the Hathaway closure was defeated. He called the question on the site plan though he stated it could not proceed. The Mayor said he would “vigorously defend” the city in any possible lawsuit.

The Council then voted to table the ordinance approving the site plan.

The French American School of New York issued a statement  saying “we will immediately commence legal action in New York State, as well as possibly Federal Court, seeking an overturning of the City Council’s decision and potential millions of dollars in damages.”

Asked for comment FASNY officials referred WPCNR to their spokesperson Geof Thompson, who issued this statement:

“We are deeply disappointed and disturbed by the outcome of tonight’s vote by the White Plains Common Council. While some members of the Council understood that the plan for our school and publicly accessible Open Space Conservancy meets all environmental and legal criteria and has been fully and thoroughly vetted, others sided with a group of neighborhood opponents and rejected the plan.

This is the same group of opponents who fought the City when it sought to purchase the property for a municipal golf course and pool (Editor’s note: in fall of 2010 when the council was not the same as tonight’s group, Mr. Krolian, Mr. Kirkpatick, and Ms. Hunt-Robinson were not on that council)

We believe this decision is unsustainable on many grounds. As a result, we will immediately commence legal action in New York State, as well as possibly Federal Court, seeking an overturning of the City Council’s Decision and potential millions of dollars in damages. We are confident that we will prevail, have the right to build the school, and that the rejection of the plan was arbitrary and capricious at best.

The Council had previously voted 6-1 that all environmental findings under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) had been met and there is no legitimate basis to now reject the plan. It is a shame that some members of this Council have sought fit to engage this City in a needless and expensive legal battle that it will lose, and cost White Plains taxpayers significant sums of money. After nearly five years of the most intensive review given to any development plan in City history, and despite numerous revisions and compromises that we have made to address the concerns of the public and the City, the rejection of a School, a very well respected one at that, is utterly unreasonable and illegal.

We have the support of hundreds of neighborhood residents, environmental organizations and the leading business organizations in Westchester County. White Plains has a well-deserved reputation as a center for schools and education, and diversity. We remain confident that the Court will uphold our plan, and that our school will become an important part of this rich community of White Plains soon.”

 

2015806 003

 John Sheehan,(above) President of the Gedney Farms Association, commenting to WPCNR after the meeting said,

“We’re very gratified by the decision tonight, and the very eloquent comments by Councilwoman Lecuona, Hunt-Robinson and Councilman Krolian. I think it’s now time for FASNY to move on. Don’t waste an more money of their school’s resources. Find another site, an appropriate site can be found.

I fine their threats to our government to be very inappropriate in trying to force a vote in their favor.”

Posted in Uncategorized

FASNY FULL PAGE AD AND LETTER TO COUNCIL AND MAYOR “NOT WORTHY OF AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION”–GEDNEY ASSOCIATION

Hits: 117

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. August 5, 2015:

Dear Members of the Common Council:

The recent letter from FASNY to our elected representatives as well as the FASNY sponsored advertisement in the Journal News threatening litigation and suggesting enormous damages to the City are both highly inappropriate and not worthy of an educational institution.  Coming just days before the Common Council’s pending decisions on the FASNY application these actions are a disreputable effort to coerce a favorable vote to it and to intimidate the Common Council. 

No one denies the right of anyone to take legal action.  In fact, regardless of the decisions in this matter litigation is possible.  However, the brazen actions of FASNY to try to so blatantly intimidate Common Council members show an unusual disrespect for the approval process and our elected governmental officials in particular.  This is not the first time that FASNY employed such offensive tactics.  Remember how they insulted the School Board and Planning Board members when they spoke out against the FASNY plans. 

Obviously, the Common Council should never let the threat of litigation be a factor in their deliberations.  I am confident that our Common Council will not bend to such unsavory efforts.

FASNY has every right to pursue a new campus for its school.  It is clear however that the former Ridgeway Country Club is the wrong site.  For FASNY not to recognize this reality and instead undertake a “scorched earth strategy” is unseemly, discredits it and will result in lasting damage to its reputation.

Very truly yours, 

John E. Sheehan

President, The Gedney Association

Posted in Uncategorized

Democrats in Senate Head Off Republican Effort to Halt Planned Parenthood Funding.

Hits: 92

WPCNR WASHINGTON WIRE. From the New York State Democratic Committee. August 5, 2015:

National Republicans were intent upon jeopardizing women’s health in order to score political points with voters. Earlier this week the Republican-controlled Senate in Washington tried to defund Planned Parenthood but were STOPPED by Senate Democrats!

If they had succeeded, millions of women could have lost vital services like breast exams, pap tests, cancer screening, pediatric care, and preventive health services and immunizations.

In effect, 97% of the Planned Parenthood’s work would have been wiped out.  

Cecile Richards, President of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, warned that “More than half of Planned Parenthood’s health centers are in rural or medically underserved areas. And for many low-income women, Planned Parenthood health centers are their sole source of medical care. Our health centers are lifelines that our country cannot afford to cut.”

New York leaders spoke up too. “…it’s clear that some of my colleagues here are so desperate to roll back Roe-v-Wade they’re so desperate to take us back to the days when women didn’t have any medical independence, that they’ll use any excuse they can get to overreact, and force this tired, same-old Planned Parenthood debate on us…But here’s the truth about Planned Parenthood: Millions of American women rely on Planned Parenthood to stay healthy. They rely on it to prevent diseases. They rely on it to detect diseases. They rely on it to treat diseases.”

Lt. Governor Kathy Hochul, standing with members of the New York State Bipartisan Pro-Choice Legislative Caucus (BPCLC), including State Senators Liz Krueger, Mike Gianaris and Velmanette Montgomery, and Assemblymembers Richard Gottfried, Todd Kaminsky, Charles Lavine, Linda Rosenthal, Rebecca Seawright, and Aravella Simotas, said, “Just as I stood with them in Congress, defending them against political extremists who orchestrate a smear campaign to achieve their goal of eliminating a woman’s right to choose, I proudly stand with Planned Parenthood and defend it so that women’s healthcare is not compromised.”

“The fact that eighteen Republican men in the United States Senate have vowed to shut down the government if they don’t succeed in defunding Planned Parenthood is absolutely shocking. As they say, if you aren’t at the table then you are on the menu. Women keep being served up in John Boehner’s and Mitch McConnell’s Congress. Meanwhile Planned Parenthood continues to provide basic services like cancer screenings and birth control to millions of women who otherwise wouldn’t have access to health care. We’ll keep working to recruit and elect women up and down the ballot, from the New York Senate to the U.S. Senate, who are ready to take us forward and not backwards on women’s rights.” said Brette McSweeney, President, Eleanor’s Legacy.

Posted in Uncategorized

10 CHARGED WITH HEROIN TRAFFICKING AND FIREARMS OFFENSES IN DUTCHESS COUNTY AT US. COURT HOUSE IN WP THIS MORNING

Hits: 206

WPCNR FBI WIRE. Special to WPCNR from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. AUGUST 5, 2015:

Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Diego Rodriguez, the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), Adrian H. Anderson, the Dutchess County Sheriff, and Ronald J. Knapp, the Chief of Police of City of Poughkeepsie Police Department, today announced the unsealing of an Indictment and two Complaints charging 10 defendants with committing heroin trafficking and firearms offenses in and around Dutchess County, New York.

Eight defendants were taken into federal custody today and were presented in White Plains federal court this afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison. Two defendants were previously taken into federal custody on a Complaint filed on May 14, 2015.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said: “Heroin is a growing problem in New York, making an unfortunate comeback in cities and rural communities alike. Heroin and prescription pill overdoses keep going up, killing more and more people every day. With heroin trafficking and firearms charges like those brought today against ten defendants selling drugs in Dutchess County, we aim to confront this epidemic. We thank the FBI, the Dutchess County Sherriff’s Office and the Poughkeepsie Police Department for their extraordinary efforts on this case.”

Assistant Director-in-Charge Diego Rodriguez said: “Today, we announce the charges against ten individuals who allegedly sought to sell heroin in the City of Poughkeepsie with the aid of firearms. The charges demonstrate the FBI’s continued effort to work closely with our law enforcement partners in eliminating the terror these groups inflict on our communities. Dismantling violent gangs remains a priority for the FBI.”

Sheriff Adrian H. Anderson said: “Today the Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office partnered with Federal and local law enforcement agencies to assist in the arrests of numerous people who have allegedly been dealing heroin and other dangerous drugs throughout Dutchess County and surrounding areas. All of these law enforcement agencies are dedicated to working together to rid our streets of dangerous drugs, and I would like to take this opportunity to thank the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the FBI, and the City of Poughkeepsie Police for their outstanding work in helping to make this investigation such an enormous success. Those who deal in heroin and other dangerous drugs are not going to be allowed to poison our community, and this investigation is the latest example of how Federal and local law enforcement agencies working together can make a huge difference and go a long way towards making our streets and residents safer.”

Chief of Police Ronald J. Knap said: “These arrests culminate a joint investigation into regional narcotics trafficking, specifically heroin. The City of Poughkeepsie was one of the communities that these suspects lived and operated in. We thank the U.S. Attorney’s Office for their work and pending prosecution of this case. We also thank the FBI and Dutchess County Sheriff for their participation in this successful investigation. The City of Poughkeepsie has suffered more than its share of heroin deaths. Arresting and prosecuting those who deal in these dangerous drugs on the Federal level is an important strategy as the effort cannot be deal with solely as a local problem.”

As alleged in the Indictment unsealed today in White Plains federal court1:

From December 2013 through June 2015, MONDU ALLAH, CARITA BENNERMAN, CLIFTON CATTS, EUGENE LAMONT GRAVES, LARRY GRAVES, MAURICE HOLLIS, JULIENNE KOLOZY, and SAMUEL TURNER conspired to sell more than one kilogram of heroin. During the course of the conspiracy, law enforcement officers observed certain defendants participating in the sale of heroin to confidential informants working with law enforcement and to an undercover law enforcement officer. Law enforcement officers, using a court-authorized wiretap, also intercepted numerous communications in which certain of the defendants discussed heroin trafficking and arranged heroin transactions. On May 13, 2015, ALLAH and HOLLIS also carried, and aided and abetted the carrying of, a firearm in furtherance of the narcotics conspiracy charged in the Indictment.

In addition the Indictment, two Complaints were also unsealed today. As alleged in those Complaints:

From December 2013 through January 2014, ROBERT NOVICK conspired to sell heroin, and sold 3, 4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine, commonly referred to as “MDMA,” in Poughkeepsie. On May 9, 2015, VARICK GOSS conspired to sell heroin and crack cocaine in Poughkeepsie.

ALLAH and HOLLIS, two of the defendants charged in the Indictment, both face a mandatory term of 10 years in prison on Count One and a mandatory term of 5 years in prison on Count Two, consecutive to any sentence on Count One. Each faces a maximum term of life in prison on both counts. The other six defendants charged in the Indictment each face a mandatory term of 10 years in prison on Count One, and a maximum term of life. Each defendant charged in the Complaints faces a maximum term of 20 years in prison. The statutory minimum and maximum sentences are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for information purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendants would be determined by the respective judges.

Mr. Bharara praised the outstanding investigative work of the FBI Hudson Valley Safe Streets Task Force, the Dutchess County Sheriff’s Office, the City of Poughkeepsie Police Department, and other local law enforcement partners.

These cases are being handled by the Office’s White Plains Division. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lauren Schorr and Douglas Zolkind are in charge of the prosecutions.

The charges contained in the Indictment and Complaints are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

1 As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the text of the Indictment and the Complaints, and the description of the Indictment and the Complaints set forth herein, constitute only allegations, and every fact described should be treated as an allegation.

Posted in Uncategorized

PLEASE VOTE NO

Hits: 96

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. Forwarded for publication. August 5, 2015:

Hon. Mayor Roach and Hon. Common Council Members:

 
On the eve of your final vote respecting the proposed FASNY project I am writing to reiterate what I know you’ve heard before from your constituents and what I believe is plain: FASNY is a very bad deal for the taxpayers of White Plains.
 
Besides that the proposed school will not benefit the vast majority of the children of White Plains; besides that FASNY will alter Hathaway Lane for its own convenience and at the peril of the already fragile ecosystem of the area; besides that the taxpayer funded resources of White Plains will be drained by an entity that will not contribute a dime to the tax base of White Plains (that will be another tax burden absorbed by the citizen of White Plains – and our taxes are high enough as it is); besides that property values in one of the most beautiful neighborhoods of the city will plummet (and diversity means economic diversity, too, in a city that I’ve been proud to live in for 20 years precisely because of its diversity; is it wise to disenfranchise such a large, active and community oriented constituency?  What would that leave in the city, should they all just sell? Yonkers comes to mind.); besides all these disruptions to traffic, community, taxes and common sense, and of highest import,
 
IT WILL IMPERIL OUR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS!
 
The White Plains Board of Education has made that very plain to you. Right now, there is construction on North Street, and it is frightening for the parents dropping children off at the YWCA, and for the workers there and at the White Plains High School, in terms of walking, crossing, and driving on North Street – and this is a minor project.  Please imagine what North Street will be like if you approve the FASNY project.  Children cross North Street unsafely NOW, at the front- and back-end of the school day, and throughout the middle of the school day to eat at Hazel’s at the YWCA.  That’s not going to change, as teenagers will always feel invincible.  What will change is the level of danger to them due to the exponentially increased traffic, construction, buses, and parents rushing to discharge and pick-up students. The school board has considered the effect of the FASNY project thoroughly and very reasonably, and has definitively come down on the side of common sense and safety for the children of White Plains.  I have to believe the Common Council will, too.
 
I will be in attendance tonight as an interested citizen.  I want to bear witness to this vote. I am urging every White Plains resident to do the same.  I want to be there for what I hope is display of common sense and true public service to the people of White Plains.
 
I urge you to vote in the only way that will signal to your constituents that you hear them, that you care about the children of White Plains, and that you care about the future of White Plains.
 
Please vote no.
 
Respectfully,
 
Theresa Gomez

=

Posted in Uncategorized

FASNY LETTER TO MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL CHALLENGED–“COUNCIL CANNOT KOWTOW TO THE LOCAL BULLY”

Hits: 103

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. AUGUST 5, 2015:

Editor’s Note: The following letter was written in reaction to a letter the French American School of New York sent to the Mayor and Common Council July 31,  but not shared by the French American School of New York with the public.

WPCNR has seen a copy, and in it, after bolstering their reasons why the city should approve it, the French American School makes this statement:

“Put bluntly, a negative vote by the Council would deny the School its vital and basic Due Process and other constitutinal and equitable rights, let alone cause it millions of dollars in damages, which it would be forced to vigorously seek to recover.”

The letter below addresses the FASNY letter issues.

Dear Mayor Roach and Honorable Members of the Common Council,
 
I write in response to the letter dated July 31, 2015 sentto you by the current Chairman and former Chairman of FASNY’s Board ofTrustees. The authors of the letter claim that it might be their last opportunityto “communicate directly” with you prior to your vote on FASNY’s application.
The problem is that, even at this late date, FASNY stilldoes not “communicate directly” when it comes to its application to close partof Hathaway Lane and construct its massive private school campus.
 
FASNY Claims It Purchased the Property With Its “EyesWide Open”
 
FASNY claims it purchased the former golf course property(the “Property”) with its eyes wide open. Before purchasing the Property did FASNYeven look in its seller’s chain of title and find the Restrictive Covenant thatruns with the land and precludes its use for any purpose other than for singlefamily homes or as a golf course? Did FASNY take note of the covenant’s prohibitionagainst using the Property for any type of “institution” other than a golfcourse? If so, how could FASNY think it, an educational “institution,” would bepermitted on the Property? Did it expect to bulldoze over the protectionsafforded by the covenant and the “substantial benefit” the covenant confersupon owners of adjacent properties?
FASNY never brought up the covenant in its publishedsubmissions to the Common Council or at public presentations or hearings. IfFASNY really wanted to “communicate directly” with you it could have addressedthe matter of the restrictive covenant, the first “elephant in the room.” Itelected not to do so.
A School Complex Is Not Permitted On The Property As MatterOf Right
 
FASNY claims that “a private [s]chool was expresslypermitted under the City’s present zoning.” If that were the case, then theprocess of reviewing its application would not have lasted 4+ years.
 
The Common Council and Mayor, with five attorneys amongthem, surely are cognizant of the Court of Appeals decision Cornell v.Bagnardi, 69 NY2d 583 (1986). That decision holds that that while there isa presumption that the location of schools or religious institutions in aparticular location may provide a benefit, that presumption can be rebutted based on the school’s overall impact onthe public’s health, safety, welfare or morals. 
When looking at the overall impact of the pendingapplication, do not be alarmed by FASNY’s escalating forecasts of the alternateuse of the Property for 100 homes. There is simply no way the environmentally-sensitiveProperty would ever see another 100 houses constructed on its soil. FASNY knowsthat, but relies on the bogeyman builder to frighten anyone who opposes itsplan.
Where, as here, thoughtful analysis reveals the overallimpact of the school would detract from the public’s health, safety, welfare ormorals, the proposal for placement of a school or religious institution shouldbe denied.
 
FASNY Routing Access Through North Street Entrance Does NOTGive The Plan A Green Light
 
FASNY’s writers claim the SEQRA Findings determined the useof North Street Access Alternative was the “only acceptable” alternative forthe School.  The Findings say no suchthing. 
The Findings determined Ridgeway was not an acceptableentrance point for FASNY’s complex, as it could not bear the additional trafficload the large campus would bring to the neighborhood. The Findings never said using North Street would makeplacement of the entrance acceptable. Several speakers and writers pointed outthat fact when FASNY made the same misrepresentation in its written submissionto the Common Council and after Mr. Zarin reiterated that remark in a publichearing. Again, FASNY was corrected earlier, but still elects not to “communicatedirectly” to the City’s elected officials. FASNY evidently believes that repeating a falsehood enough times canmake it true. It cannot.
 
FASNY Will Be A Sore Loser
 
In not-so-subtle language, FASNY threatens that if its application is denied it will sue the City of White Plains. Gee, does that comeas a surprise?  The elected officials of White Plains cannot administer the affairs of the City if it kowtows to the local bully.
The Common Council should evaluate FASNY’s application based onits merits, and not based on the size of FASNY’s war chest. The rattling swordsof FASNY’s solicitors should not intimidate the City’s elected officials, nordissuade them from determining the outcome of the application based solely onthe merits of FASNY’s application, or lack thereof.  
 
If the Common Council were to vote against FASNY’s application, as it should, and FASNY were to challenge that determination incourt, the relevant analysis would be whether the City’s determination were “improper,irrational, arbitrary or capricious.” Pine Knolls Alliance Church v. ZoningBd. Of Appeals of Town of Moreau, 5 N.Y. 3d 407, 415 (2005). 
 
The Mayor and Members of the Common Council are in the bestposition to know if their analysis was improper, irrational, arbitrary orcapricious. If it was not, then the City’s exposure to liability is a non-issue.Therefore the City can vote down theapplication based upon a lawful determination that, under the standard of Cornellv. Bagnardi, the proposed school complex and road closure would detract from the public’s  health, safety, welfare andmorals, and overall would have a detrimental impact on the neighborhood. The CommonCouncil should reject the application.
 
Respectfully submitted,
 
Claudia G. Jaffe, Esq.
Posted in Uncategorized

COMMON COUNCIL RECONVENES ON THE FRENCH AMERICAN SCHOOL THIS EVENING 7 PM CITY HALL. LOCAL FIOS AND CABLEVISION CARRY IT ON CHANNELS 47 AND 75

Hits: 72

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE EXAMINER. AUGUST 5, 2015:

The French American School of New York proposal to build a campus of school buildings in the heart of Gedney Farms on the former Ridgeway Country Club will be taken up again by the Common Council tonight at 7 in Common Council Chambers, 255 Main Street, City Hall.

The project review started in January, 2011.

This is a continuation of the past June 29 meeting where Councilpersons John Martin, Nadine Hunt-Robinson, Milagros Lecuona and Dennis Krolian raised new concerns about Hathaway Lane closures, completeness of plan, and whether if the project is built the condition of the property after the project is built and effects “mitigated” will not be worse than it is now.

The Mayor and the Corporation Counsel have not responded to WPCNR queries over the last 5 days as to whether a final vote will take place, whether the Special Permit plan will be tabled if the Hathaway Lane Closure is rejected,  or whether the French American School will speak on why they feel the conditions have been mitigated to meet the Council concerns raised June 29; or whether the Council members have been assured in private by the city that mitigations will be strictly enforced, and the Hathaway closure manageable for the neighborhoods. Again  city hall has not answered these questions I put to them.

Tonight the meeting will be televised countywide on Verizon Fios Channel 47(including White Plains), but Cablevision subscribers in White Plains can only see the meeting on Channel 75.

Posted in Uncategorized

Resident of Gedney Farms Rebuts Westchester Business Council on their Support of FASNY Approval

Hits: 73

THE WPCNR LETTER TICKER. AUGUST 4, 20015:

To John Ravitz  and Marsha Gordon,Westchester Business Council:

It was so kind of you to ask your members to encourage the (White Plains) Common Council to vote Yes To Fasny. Also threatening them with a lawsuit from Fasny if they don’t vote Yes. I see you live in Pelham.We happen to be residents of White Plains  since 1969 and are in the areas that would be affected.
There are thousands and thousands of people like us who will be severely impacted by a yes vote. Perhaps you are not aware of how many city commissions and boards that have said no to the Fasny plan. The Board of Education unanimously signed a letter telling of the dangers to all of the White Plains families and students if Fasny were passed. Also the Planning  Board.
These letters were sent to our Mayor and Common Council. I personally , along with others, went door to door throughout the City with petitions saying No to Fasny. There are over 3,000 signatures.  Is your membership that high?  We are not a small group of irritated neighbors . No matter what FASNY tells you. Thousands  of residents will live with air pollution , noise pollution , water problems .serious traffic  issues and safety issues for our own children.
We will also pay more in taxes. This will not affect you because you are far away and won’t know the difference. I cannot believe you would want to see any harm come to your children because of traffic issues. This is a monster of a school and according to covenants is illegal to be on that property.
I am not sure how you get your monetary figures that would be generated by Fasny. I can’t figure out since these people live in Westchester County already and have been shopping here for years and the school has been in existence in Westchester County for 10 years. Seems to me you all have been drinking the Kool-Aid. You are buying what FASNY is telling you all.
You are forgetting the human element  of this and only thinking  about the financial element , which will probably never happen. No doubt Fasny wants their school. They certainly don’t care how much it will destroy people who live here and pay taxes.
We are suppose to lie down and let them run over us. You all need to think in other terms. I assure you we will not let them run over us. You should be more open minded to the other side of this. If this was your city and neighborhood you would fight like mad to protect it.

Sharon Gould
White Plains , N.Y.

Posted in Uncategorized