A Chanuka Sermon

Hits: 0

WPCNR MAIN STREET JOURNAL. December 20, 2008: A reader has sent along the following sermon announcing the beginning of Chanuka, The Festival of Light Sunday evening, giving a perspective on this special time. WPCNR is pleased to pass this along in the spirit of the season:
A Chanukah Sermon
Rabbi Sid Schwarz
Founder/President, PANIM: The Institute for Jewish Leadership and Values

Tomorrow night, Dec. 21st corresponding to the 25th day of Kislev in the
Hebrew calendar, marks the first night of Chanukah. The very word Chanukah,
conjures up happy and joyous images and memories for most Jews. Dreidel
(spinning top) games, latkes (potato pancakes), presents or at least some
Chanukah gelt (money) are all part of the Chanukah experience. 

Surveys tell us that Chanukah is one of the two most popular festivals for
American Jews, Passover being the other. Passover is mentioned as one of the
three pilgrimage festivals in the Bible, a time when Jews in ancient times
made their way to Jerusalem to celebrate the holiday. But Chanukah is not
even mentioned in the Torah as its historical origins post-date the Biblical
canon. Some rabbis have cynically commented on the popularity of Chanukah as
the attempt of Jews to copy the observance of Christmas by their gentile
neighbors. How better for Jewish parents to counter the “Christmas envy” of
their children than to provide a “Jewish Christmas”.

But motivations for observance notwithstanding, just as serious Christians
try hard to put the Christ back into Christmas, Jews too must drill down a
bit to discover the power of the Chanukah message. And when they do, they
will discover a message that is as central to Jewish teaching as any in our
tradition. It is also a message desperately needed in the world.

In 198 BCE, the Syrians conquered the land of Israel bringing it under the
influence of Hellenism which had swept the continent over the previous two
centuries. With the rise of Antiochus Epiphanies as the king of Syria in
175, the Jews of Israel suddenly faced a tyrant bent on crushing the
practice of Judaism and enforcing the submission of Jews to the political
and cultural influence of Hellenism and the Seleucid kingdom. In 169
Antiochus devastated Jerusalem, massacring thousands of Jews and desecrating
Judaism’s holiest shrine, the Temple in Jerusalem.

While much of the political and religious elite of Israel seemed prepared to
bend to the will of their powerful enemies and compromise on the tenets of
Judaism, one family, the Hashmoneans, refused. Under the military leadership
of Judah the Maccabee, Israel gradually rallied against Antiochus. On the
25th day Kislev, the Maccabees retook Jerusalem from the Syrians and
rededicated the Temple for Jewish worship. The Hebrew word Chanukah,
literally means, “dedication”.  The custom of celebrating eight days of
Chanukah stems from the belief that the small amount of oil that was
available to rekindle the menorah (sacred lamp) in the Temple burned for
eight days even though the amount of oil was barely sufficient for one.

Whether or not one believes literally in the miracle of the high octane oil,
on a spiritual level Chanukah is about a much bigger miracle. It is the
miracle of faith conquering fear; the miracle of the few overcoming the
many; the miracle of liberty winning out over oppression.

As is so often the case, life and history come to affirm eternal truths. I
believe that it is no coincidence that Chanukah comes within a week or two
of Human Rights Day every year. Human Rights Day was celebrated on December
10, or at least it should have been celebrated. We ignore the day at our
peril. This year marked the 60th anniversary of the adoption of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations. Enshrined in
that international agreement are principles that are at the core of
democracy: the right to life, liberty and security of person; equal justice
before the law; protection against cruel and degrading forms of punishment;
freedom of thought, conscience and religious practice.

These principles are also at the core of Judaism. Genesis 1:27 articulates
the principle that every human being is made in the image of God (tzelem
elohim). I believe that tzelem elohim is the single most radical teaching in
the Torah. “Radical” has two meanings and I intend both. The first meaning
of “radical” is “going to the origin or fundamental meaning”. In that sense
tzelem elohim points to the fundamental teaching of the entire Torah-treat
every person as if they were made in the image of God.  The second meaning
of “radical” is “drastic reform from a current state of social or political
affairs”. Were we to internalize the message of tzelem elohim in our own
behavior and succeed in getting societies and nation-states to abide by that
principle as well, we would be well on our way to the Messianic era.

We are far from that place!
-In violation of the teachings of Torah we stand as idle witnesses to the
ongoing genocide in Darfur. The Sudanese government defies international
sanctions with impunity, the Chinese continue to support the perpetrators of
genocide with arms and Darfurians continue to die.
– In violation of the teachings of Torah we stand as idle witnesses to the
ongoing repression in Burma.  A military dictatorship has been in control of
the country since 1990. There is widespread state sponsored human
trafficking, forced child labor and use of sexual violence as a means of
political control and repression. Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi
has been under perpetual house arrest for years and the attempted peaceful
protest by Buddhist monks in Burma last year was put down violently.
– In violation of the teachings of Torah we stand as idle witnesses to the
illegal rule of Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe. Ignoring his agreement to share
power after he lost the most recent election to Morgan Tsvangirai, Mugabe
has ruthlesslesly intimidated and killed his opponents, has plundered the
country of its wealth and has left most of the country subject to disease
and starvation.

Tyranny is far from defeated in our world. We have a long way to go to get
the world to abide by the principles of the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights
that are so consistent with Jewish values.

In the Chanukah story, the Maccabees were the ones who fought for liberty,
for the right to practice their religion, for the dignity of human freedom.
Two thousand years before Patrick Henry they declared: “Give me liberty or
give me death!”

Who are the Maccabees who will fight for human rights in our world today?
Nelson Mandela has been a Maccabee in the way he helped South Africa emerge
from a history of apartheid and insured that his society would be ruled, not
by vengeance over the past, but by forgiveness and reconciliation. The Dali
Lama has been a Maccabee in the way he has represented peaceful resistance
to the Chinese occupation of his native Tibet and has become a peace
emissary to the world. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., whose birthday we will
celebrate next month, was a Maccabee in the way he helped this country face
its deeply rooted racism and showed us a path to a better America.

Just last week I participated in a national conference sponsored by Rabbis
for Human Rights here in Washington D.C. That conference was infused with
the Maccabee spirit  because the organization understands that truth and
honesty demand that we not only point the finger and act on violations of
human rights around the world, but that we need to look in our own backyard
as well. 

It is now common knowledge that our own country has been involved in
state-sponsored torture of detainees, not only in Guantanamo, but in prisons
all around the globe. The Center for Constitutional Rights has documented
that the prisoners range in age from age14 to 80. Most have been denied
access to legal representation. Military experts have testified that the use
of torture is ineffective in extracting information from prisoners and the
practice has made a mockery of America’s claim to be fighting to protect
democracy and human rights around the world.

Even more difficult is for us to look at our beloved State of Israel. Rabbis
for Human Rights is a deeply Zionist organization. It believes that after
2000 years of persecution and the near annihilation of our people during the
Holocaust that the legitimacy of a Jewish homeland in the Middle East is a
necessity. Yet rabbis need to answer to a higher authority. They need to be
Maccabees.

In Israel, Rabbis for Human Rights has fought against illegal home
demolitions, has helped protect Palestinians from Jewish settlers who would
prevent them from harvesting their olive crops, and has called upon the
state to provide equal treatment to all of its citizens regardless of race,
religion or nationality. These are not easy standards to implement in a
country that has been under siege for all 60 years of its existence and that
has enemies both outside and within its borders. However it is a standard
that is set in Israel’s own Declaration of Independence when it calls on the
country to live up to the standards of justice and peace as envisioned and
articulated by the Biblical prophets like Isaiah, Amos and Jeremiah.

Chanukah coincides with the winter solstice. It is the darkest time of the
year. And into that darkness, we are commanded to bring forth light. In the
Talmud there is debate as two whether the Chanukah menorah should be lit
with eight candles the first night, decreasing by one each night until we
only have one on the last night or rather, to start with one and finish with
eight. The ruling was to move from one to eight suggesting that even a
thousand years ago, the rabbis understood something about human nature and
human history.

We live in a dark time. In a world ravaged by war, prejudice, disease and
now, an economic crisis that will put hundreds of thousands of people at
risk of great suffering, we need to bring more light. Each and every day, we
need more light-just like on Chanukah. And to bring light, we need to become
Maccabees, women and men of faith who believe that liberty is worth fighting
for, that human dignity is worth fighting for and that justice is worth
fighting for.

Rabbi Sid Schwarz is the founding rabbi of Adat Shalom Reconstructionist
Congregation in Bethesda, MD. He is the president of PANIM: The Institute
for Jewish Leadership and Values. His most recent book is Judaism and
Justice: The Jewish Passion to Repair the World (Jewish Lights).




Posted in Uncategorized

The Difference Between Illinois & NY? We Offer Fundraising for Senate Seats

Hits: 0

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. News and Commentary By John F. Bailey. December 20, 2008: Well G-Rod has the entire Illinois legislature calling for his impeachment. I’m shocked, simply shocked that Illinois senate seat was being shopped.  What’s wrong with that if it’s done by good people who do not use the F-word?


After all, it’s been done in New York for years, where everything with power attached to it is for sale. No one does anything for nothing in NY.  Everyone in New York knows that. Money wins elections and the ability to raise money for the party – is a key factor in who runs for office. It even trumps qualifications.


 



Here in New York, G-Rod  we talk this way instead of , “I contribute to your campaign, you don’t pass legislation that is going to stop me from making money, get it pal? I’ll expletiving sue you,”  becomes, “Tom, these provisions cutting back our interest charges are really going to hurt us recover in this economy, we’d really appreciate it if you could postpone them for a year and a half, and I’ll see you at the inaugural.”


Trouble is G-Rod was just a little crude about working his prospects.


He lacked telephone etiquette. Perhaps the FBI should run some taps on New York’s present elected representatives, and G-Rod might hear some very different, very gentle businesslike conversations to take some pointers. In New York, G-Rod could claim a “best practices” defense.


But, he’s learning.  


His 3-minute news conference Friday  in the Windy City showed that he’s definitely picking up some finesse – he said he’s done nothing wrong. And, you know he’s right.


 He just got a little tough on the telephone, asking for political support, instead he asked in an oblique way (rather crudely) for money in return for a Senate seat, according to some of the tapes. Well that’s done in New York all the time.  


In fact, it’s being done now.


 See here in New York, G-Rod, where everything is for sale, and nothing gets done unless you pay for it, we’re ladies and gentlemen about it. We cover our money trails. We leave discreet intervals before the payoffs are made. 


Somehow the Feds leave us alone and the deals go through, over and over again.  Nobody raises an eyebrow.


Once in awhile we catch payoff schemes, disbar a lawyer, but eventually we reinstate them if they’re nice. Once in awhile we get a phone tip about an employee buying things with government money, and he is pilloried in press, but still departs with a juicy pension. It’s the way New York works in the corridors of power though it’s all coming apart lately. Big time.


You just have to be subtle. Hold cocktail parties.  Golf outings.  Parties at country clubs. Set up Political Action Committees that raise money for a candidate or a string of candidates. Have “Friends of” committees that feed money into city committees who support candidates who vote in project after project.


But New Yorkers above all,  love names without  substance. We’re suckers.


You  have to cultivate a name and if you have a name and the ability to fundraise – when you want something like a senate seat, you’re real subtle. You have your close friends and relatives promote you as a wonderful public service oriented individual who will be great for New York.  


Remember the line, “Let’s put Bobby Kennedy to work for New York.”? That’s how Bobby Kennedy did it in New York in 1964 when he established residency and defeated Senator Kenneth Keating. Senator Hillary Clinton followed a similar schtick in 2000, beating the unknown Rick Lazio, when Rudolf Giuliani did not run. This game is getting tedious.


If you’re from a rich or politically connected family on first name basis with other names in high places  who can get you cushy jobs in Washington or New York, you’re in great shape. New York is a sucker for big name.  And when you come back to N.Y  from Washington, you’re a name. New York just has one party, too, that makes it even sweeter. You’ve got an Assembly Seat, State Senate Seat, Senate seat, Congressional seat for life.


We’ve had a lot people like that come to New York and come in here to represent us. There was Bobby. There was Hillary. Mario. Daniel P. Andy. Now there is Caroline.  


Quick, can any one see what is the unique thread here – they all could raise money, supposedly enough to help those presently in office raise more money on their own.


 When they were not in office, they used their charisma to raise money for their party and local and state politicians. They showed up and worked for the party. They glad-hand. When an opening comes up, they naturally are tapped.


 A grateful party sees they have name recognition and in they go. A President moves to New York, raises tons of money for party nationally  and locally, and suddenly his wife gets the Senate nomination? No connection, of course.  She’s so qualified.


 A former Attorney General sets up a residency in New York after his brother is assassinated and he runs for Senator  of New York and wins. It is a familiar pattern. 


New York has become a reincarnation venue for big name politicians without a job, and our Democratic Party loves running them in here. We bring in political super stars like the Yankees bring in Free Agents. These people know the old New York money. They know the powerful because they are powerful themselves. New York power types fawn over them like celebrities.


These carpetbaggers get to run for high office because they have magic names that translated into money to buy spots, offices, polls, lawyers. They work fundraising events, chair foundations, work locally in high profile agencies and know everybody. They attract money bees like pollen.


 Candidates on the local level have been told in the past they need at least $25,000 to run for city governments.  Now I do not know how much they contribute – but they do hold fundraisers to pour money into the party.  Even long elected officials who are not facing any opposition run fundraisers.  You have to be able to raise money. As you move up you have to raise more money for the party, not just yourself.


Now if you’re not running for anything, why hold a fundraiser? Who gets the money?  Oh, we’re always told they have to raise it for the next campaign whatever it may be. For State Senate, Assembly, congress, or maybe Senator.


Well everybody is all over G-Rod because, well obviously someone wanted to get him, and the FBI did their duty with their incriminating tapes. G-Rod contributed with his mouth. But, did anyone ever give him money for an office seat? Soliciting as he did was done crudely –  no manners, simply making it a little too plain how politicians operate. He was embarrassing.


Come on.  In New York State it is a way of life.


Just look at the projects that have been approved recently. A well-known developer contributes lots of money to a certain community leader and bingo, the governing body eventually buys the builder’s  building, saying it was the best buy. How convenient. Coincidence, of course.


Anything wrong here? Hello Gangbusters.  Just go over the developing that’s done by the familiar suspects and you’ll see the big names on the big political elected officials PAC Committee lists. It’s shall we say, perhaps a cost of doing business? (Don’t wait for tips on horny Governors to start an investigation).


  In New York, we do not call this bribery, or soliciting, we call it “providing support.” Now if G-Rod in his conversations, he might have rephrased to Senate Candidate 5, as saying “I love you Jessie, we really need you in the Senate, how can our organizations work together and make both of them stronger, and coordinate what we need in  Chicago with what you can do for us  in the senate?” Now that sounds a lot better doesn’t it?  Where is an etiquette, ethics coach when you need them.


People who get places and swing deals say things like that here in New York. People wanting things from elected officials lobby them, and committees solicit money and dole it out to politicians, and low and behold regulations get loosened, projects get approved, zoning codes get changed, Special Permits by the dozen get granted. Tax abatements are a breeze. IDA commitments, no problem-O.


Funding of housing projects that cost far more than they should gets done – take years more than they should to complete — with taxpayer money. Look no farther than the faux Yankee Stadium and the pathetic Citi Field giveaways to the two richest teams in baseball. New York  City extracted a suite from the Yankees – was that a bribe – no way that was – well, what was it? A courtesy? A gift to the city. What was that anyway?


Certain PAC Committees collect money from developers and then distribute the money to candidates, some do not even say how they spent their money and nobody cares because there are no penalties for disobeying the reporting laws.


Caroline Kennedy has been touted by her supporters for our Senate Seat for her humanity, her good works, and her ability to fundraise. This was the first plum dangled to Governor David Patterson by the Caroliners.  


Isn’t that offering a very subtle bribe to Governor Patterson publicly? But, wait, not a bribe, an advantage dangled.


The other candidates are no names – who bring no money to the table, but 100% more legislative experience. Caroline Kennedy has never written a law in her life. She’s written a book on the constitution, with a collaborator. She has never worked for a law firm, apparently, according to her biography, but has worked for major fundraising organizations in New York specializing in education. Perhaps she can be the education Senator.


Essentially, she has enough money and fame, to spend most of her time keeping the Kennedy mystique alive, and also being on the A-list as an attractor of rich people with money who can write checks. Big ones. Lots of them.  What a legacy! Just what we need in New York, and the only skill really respected.


Now  other than the fact she will command a lot of face time in the senate saying all the right things for New York, perhaps that’s all you want in a Senator, whose job mainly is to pump money into the state from federal coffers, and send out press releases about it.


Judging from Senatorial performance the last 8 months, she can’t do any more harm than the 100 bought-and-paid  legislators in there now.  Because, make no mistake the lobbyists run Washington. Chris Dodd, the Senator who runs the banking committee got $4 Million from credit institution interests and he has been sitting on credit reform for years. They work for their contributors, not you, and that’s who they listen to.


 


Here’s a prediction.  Who do you think  will be the next to get a bailout?


 The big losers in the Madoff $50 Billion Caper.


$50 Billion? That’s a drop in the bucket. You can bet that Senators’ and Representatives’ telephone lines are burning up with calls from the rich and famous this minute, saying, “You Son-of-a-expletive, you’re not getting another dime unless you make me whole. I’m  expletiving ruined. I made you and you have to make us whole.”


What do you think? No one has thought at all about saving you, Mr. and Mrs. and Ms. White Plains. I want to hear what Caroline thinks we should do before she goes up to the Senate.


However, Governor David Patterson has to get some sort of quid pro quo from the Caroliners.


He has to be assured that the party will not throw him under the bus and put Andrew Cuomo, his rival for the next Gubernatorial Nomination – coming up in 2010—behind the big wheel of the Democratic Party Super Cruiser.


Putting Andrew Cuomo into the senate clears the decks for Patterson, however, that could backfire if the Democratics then decide to run Caroline for Governor – hey if Caroline would be a great Senator, she’d be a great governor, too, wouldn’t she? And she’d be so easy to manipulate.  On second thought, I take that back, send her to Washington where she will hurt us less.


Something Governor Patterson is not, is manipulatable. Otherwise he would never have shown the legislators up so much.


Governor Patterson is making a lot of enemies in Albany by showing – YES, we can get a budget submitted before Christmas. YES, we can cut the state budget , and YES we can cut state aid to education, and YES, we can consolidate departments.


This is heresy to every last State Senator and Assemblyperson, every union head, every bureaucracy, every development agency.  He has made the legislature look unprofessional, which of course they are – but they are very smart professionals actually  who have been stealing from us for years, and we thank them very much, they never could have done it without us.


Governor Patterson is the enemy to them. They want him out of there in the worst way.


Our Senators, Charles Schumer, and Ms. Clinton have promised the ObamaBucks will bail New York out. More Medicaid refunds to New York.  $50 Billion will do it (and include the Tappan Zee Bridge, no doubt.)


Perhaps Governor Patterson should appoint himself to the Senate Seat that Hillary the latest Carpetbagger is leaving. That would fix them all. But, I do not think he can do that.


Oh – and by the way, no one should ever watch Saturday Night Live again after that sorry, embarrassing, tasteless skit about The Governor last week.


The network should seriously consider firing the sorry minds who approved all the way to the top. It was back to ridiculing the handicapped. Something the non-funny comedians do very well.


The Governor memorizes all his speeches because he cannot read teleprompters or pages.  Something the skit performer might not have done in his little horrible skit.


He and his budget director have put every financial officer to shame by overhauling this state budget so thoroughly faster than any governor ever.


And as far as appointing the next Senator –  I do not know what I would do in his position — perhaps one of our NY Congressional Representatives who are at least in congress now.


If Patterson is not nominated to run for  Governor – you heard the reason why  here first.


He’s trying to work for you.

Posted in Uncategorized

Being Outside Shoveling Snow in Cold Improves Focus, Memory

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR OUTDOOR LIFE. From University of Michigan News Service.(EDITED) December 19, 2008: With White Plains experiencing its first snowfall of the season Friday of 6 inches falling at the WPCNR News Tower as of 9:30 P.M., and turning roads into slow-going treacherous circumlocutions, shovelers tonight can take heart: Being outside, helps improve your focus—even when it’s cold out.



A really “white” White Plains viewed from the WPCNR News Tower 4:30 P.M. The six inch snow job made traveling treacherous, bumper to bumper on Route 119 and there were a lot of fender benders motorists reported to WPCNR surrounding the city. Kids tomorrow will be saying, “Look out slopes, here I come.”




Researchers believe the findings could have broader impact on helping people who may be suffering from mental fatigue (from perhaps listening to  too many Common Council meetings,  County Board of Legislators meetings, Board of Education meetings, work sessions, news network and financial radio station commentators, seated Senators offering comments,  Assemblymen and State Senators worrying about cuts,  CEOs crying for money,  and Senator Wanna-Be’s saying how they want to give something back by serving into the Senate.)

“Interacting with nature can have similar effects as meditating,” Berman said. “People don’t have to enjoy the walk to get the benefits. We found the same benefits when it was 80 degrees and sunny over the summer as when the temperatures dropped to 25 degrees in January. The only difference was that participants enjoyed the walks more in the spring and summer than in the dead of winter.”

Kaplan and his wife, Rachel Kaplan, a researcher in psychology and the School of Natural Resources and Environment, argue that people are far more likely to be satisfied with their lives when their environment supports three basic needs: the ability to understand and explore; to feel they make a difference; and to feel competent and effective.

Berman decided to test that theory by sending study participants on walking routes around Ann Arbor. Participants walked on an urban route down main streets and also on a route in U-M’s Matthaei Botanical Gardens and Nichols Arboretum, taking in nature. When participants walked in the Arboretum, they improved their short-term memory by 20 percent, but showed no improvements after walking down city streets.

The researchers also tested the same theory by having subjects sit inside and look at pictures of either downtown scenes or nature scenes and again the results were the same: when looking at photos of nature, memory and attention scores improved by about 20 percent, but not when viewing the urban pictures.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Mayor Disputes Charge He Refused to Meet with Boykin/Malmud on Contract B4 Vote

Hits: 0

WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT. From The Mayor’s Office. December 18, 2008: Mayor Joseph Delfino’s office has issued the following statement clarifying the exchange between Councilpersons Rita Malmud and Benjamin Boykin regarding Mrs. Malmud’s request for a meeting with the Mayor before Wednesday’s rejection vote.



Mayor Joseph Delfino clarifies Boykin-Malmud-Delfino interchange on the Police-Fire Contract. File Photo of Mayor, taken October 24, 2008


The Mayor’s Office released this statement Thursday afternoon from Melissa Lopez, the Mayor’s press officer:


The Mayor had asked me to contact you to let you know that the statement made by Councilwoman Malmud is incorrect. 


Ben Boykin and Rita Malmud did in fact contact the Mayor for a meeting but the Mayor did not deny meeting with them instead he requested that he does not meet solely with just two members of the council.  He suggested that Ben and Rita contact their fellow cou`ncil members and schedule a time where they could all meet with the Mayor.  No one ever called the Mayor back.

Posted in Uncategorized

Councilman Boykin Issues Statement on Contract NIX: Flexibility Needed.

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE EXAMINER. December 18, 2008: Councilman Benjamin Boykin, who joined with Councilpersons  Milagros Lecuona, Rita Malmud, Dennis Power and Tom Roach to defeat the union-ratified Police/Fire contract Wednesday evening issued this statement to WPCNR Thursday evening:



Councilman Benjamin Boyin. August 5, 2008



The Common Council voted 5 to 2 to turn down the proposed Police and Fire union contracts negotiated between the Mayor and the unions.

The reason for turning down the contracts relate to the term of the contracts and salary increase amounts given the economic situation of the city and the general economic environment. With the city laying off employees, closing the library on Fridays, reducing the current year budget by $4.0 million and cutting back on some services, financial flexibility is critical to our city’s long term financial viability.


(More)



Under the city charter, the Mayor is charged with negotiations with the unions. The Common Council can accept/reject the proposed settlements.

In early December, I called the Mayor’s office and requested that Councilwoman Malmud and I meet with the Mayor to provide some comments on the contracts that were presented to us in November. The Mayor did not want to meet with us.

We have a wonderful police and firefighters in our city. They are top notch and professional. They protect the public and safety of our city.

The salary settlements included in the contracts are generous even in good economic times. We now are facing an economic tsunami and the largest economic crisis since the Great Depression. Economic circumstances have changed and we must adjust to this new fiscal reality. It is critical that our city maintain its financial flexibility in these uncertain and dire economic times. 

I believe that a one year contract with the proposed schedule changes and training changes and an appropriate salary adjustment should be completed. It would provide the unions with an increase in these tough economic times and provide the city with financial flexibility to response to rapidly changing economic situations.

Councilman Ben Boykin

Posted in Uncategorized

Should The Yanks and Mets Be Bailed Out for $450 M More in Loans?

Hits: 0

WPCNR VOICE OF DA FAN. December 18, 2008:  Ahh, the spirit of giving is in the air! As the Associated Press reported two weeks ago, and The New York Times reported several weeks ago, both the Yankees and the Mets who have just signed several high-priced free agent players, the managements of both teams have asked New York City to float them more city financing to finish their new Stadiums, both scheduled to open in April.



This is amazing chutz-pah. Cheeky, even in the midst of the city’s biggest financial crisis since the early 70s (when Abe Beame “knew the buck”).  As if the Yankees and Mets ever contributed anything to the city with their $7 beers, $5 dollar hot dogs and $5 Sodas, $40 nosebleed seats, and decaying ballclubs and lousy baseball last year. And the Yankees are still fighting the city over the right to sack the old Yankee Stadium for the memorabilia profits. Well the Metropolitans and The Yankees sure do know the buck — as well as Goldman Sachs.


The Yankees have asked the city for $259 Million in tax-exempt bonds and $111 Million more in taxable bonds  to be floated on their faux Yankee Stadium in addition to the $940 Million in tax-exempt bondies and $25 Million in taxable municipal bonds for the $1.3 million ball park in the Bronx. These bonds can be resold at a profit by organizations they are issued to.


The Metropolitans are not asking for as much begging for a mere $83 million more over the $615 Million approved for their $800 Million Citi Field (that name still fills me with disgust.)


Shortly after these requests, these financial juggernauts signed pitchers for massive contracts. You could make the case the city owns those new players.


The point of today’s Voice of Da Fan Poll is should the city float this extra financing for these private organizations — whom their managements have said are not for sale and do not need “bailing out?” Vote in the poll on the right.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Rita Malmud on the Contract NIX — Mayor Refused to Meet.

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. December 18, 2008: Councilwoman Rita Malmud has issued this statement to WPCNR on the Common Council 5-2 decision to reject the three year contract ratified by the Police and Fire unions, last night. Here is Ms. Malmud’s statement:


 



Councilwoman Rita Malmud, August 5, 2008


 WPCNR: Would you care to give me a statement on why you and your colleagues rejected the police-fire contract?


 


Councilwoman Rita Malmud: When the City is significantly cutting jobs, programs, and materials, we cannot afford to increase salaries at a rate comparable to when City coffers were richer and the general economy robust.


 WPCNR: 2. What is next? According to the best of your knowledge?

Councilwoman Malmud: Only the Mayor has the State authorized power to negotiate union contracts.  I assume our Mayor will begin talks anew with the unions to find a different resolution that we can all accept.


 

WPCNR: 3. Why did the council not make it’s uncomfortableness with the contract known before scheduling this voter?

Councilwoman Malmud: The Mayor and his staff take many months to negotiate a proposed contract.  After a careful review of limited information given to us only a few weeks ago, Council President Boykin and I asked to meet with Mayor Delfino last week to give  him insight into our own reservations, as well as similar comments we had heard from some of the other Councilmembers.  Mayor Delfino refused to meet with the two of us on this subject.  Council President Boykin and I are acutely aware that we are not negotiators here, only fiscal shepherds.  To comment publicly before the administratively appointed vote date would lend credence to interfering with negotiations.

Posted in Uncategorized

Council Rejects Mayor’s Police-Fire Deal, 5-2. Mediation May Be Next: Wood

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE EXAMINER. Special to WPCNR from Don Hughes. December 17,2008 UPDATED 11:25 P.M. E.S.T.: Before an audience of about 50 firefighters and police officers, the Common Council rejected the 3-year, 3.75%, 4% and 4% contract with work rules changes, presented them by the Mayor,  turning down the contract a vote of 5-2 this evening.


Paul Wood, City Executive Officer in a written statement released to WPCNR tonight said,


“We’re disapointed that what we considered a good contract for the City was rejected. I’ll have to speak to the union and see if we go back to the negotiating table or to mediation. “


Councilpersons Benjamin Boykin,  Milagros Lecouona, Rita Malmud, Dennis Power,  and Tom Roach voted against the contract.   Councilman Glen Hockley and Mayor Joseph Delfino voted for approval of the contract. The contract is reported to have been negotiated exclusively by Mayor Delfino and Executive Officer Paul Wood.


With each councilperson speaking at length on the topic, the major sticking point for the five nay-sayers was length of the contract.


Those five voting against it preferred a one-year contract, instead of committing the city to 4% in both years two and three. It was unclear whether the council members voting against it were comfortable with the 3.75% in the first year.


Paul Wood was queried by WPCNR late Thursday evening on whether any member of the Common Council ever informed the Mayor or him that they only wished to make a one year agreement, and Mr. Wood said, “No.”


No members of the public were permitted to speak for or against the contract. The members of the council appeared to be supportive of the work rules changes in which police would be permitted 12-hour duty tours and firemen 24-hour duty tours.


Councilman Benjamin Boykin rejected Mayor Joseph Delfino’s contention that the rate of inflation was 4.7%, Boykin saying it was 2.7%.  It was unclear at the close of the meeting what the next step on hammering out an agreement would be.


The Council was presented with the agreement in Executive Session four weeks ago on November 12 in Executive Session. Details of the contract were not available to the public until this week when WPCNR reported them


 Councilperson Dennis Power told the Mayor last night,  that Councilpersons Malmud and Boykin wanted to speak with the Mayor about the contract. Delfino said that the Council should have spoken collectively in the work session on the contract.


In a presentation to the Council after the vote on the budget situation, Gina Cuneo-Harwood, the city Financial Officer offered no new revelations on the budget, predicting the city expected a sales tax collection for the year of $50 Million, which would beat the city target of $45 Million. She also said she expected mortgage recording taxes to be down $1.3 Million, also not exactly new news.

Posted in Uncategorized

City Must Clean up Gedney Dump Carcinogen Contamination , DEC Says.

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE DUMP NEWS. By John F. Bailey. December 17, 2008 UPDATED 11:30 P.M. E.S.T.: A press spokesperson from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation told WPCNR today that the DEC has received completed test results of wells testing executed last spring, and that their team of technicians has determined that the TCE-contaminates found in the City Dump are still leaking leachate into the Mamaroneck River in a quantity that requires remediation.


Wendy Rosenbach, spokesperson of the DEC office in New Paltz, told WPCNR a final report is awaited from the city, but regardless of what that reports says, the DEC will require some form of cleanup of the contaminants, the extent of the remediation has yet to be determined. No other information was immediately available, according to Ms. Rosenbach, except that remediation will be required of the city.


Paul Wood, Executive Officer of the city, when asked for a statement on the DEC decison told WPCNR late Thursday evening, “Tomorrow I’ll check with Bud and corp council (Edward Dunphy).” 

Posted in Uncategorized

Governor Cuts School Aid from 3% to 13% Based on Present Formula. Wicks Law OUT

Hits: 0

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. From The Governor’s Press Office. December 17, 2008 (Edited): In a detailed news release, Governor David A. Patterson goes into the specifics of his revision of New York aid to education in his revised 2008-2009 Budget and his 2009-2010 Budget. He calls for school districts to receive state aid based on the school aid formula now in effect, resulting in cuts of 3% to 13% in aid.


The White Plains City School District has been contacted  by WPCNR to see if  it contemplate any  immediate cuts in the currently running 2008-2009 School Budget of $284.4 Million , which has six months and two weeks left as the city has undertaken cuts this week. The School District received a 15% increase in state aid last year, most of which was paid for by the state legislature decreasing (with no publicity on the cut) the STAR Exemption which forced White Plains residents to pay $1 Million of the $1.4 Million in increased school aid.


Another interesting proposal of the Governor’s would suspend the Wicks Law (requiring four separate contractors for every school contracted job, basically) for five years. Here is the Governor’s news release:


The Executive Budget reduces education aid in 2009-10 by $698 million or 3.3 percent from 2008-09 while maintaining a commitment to both long-term increases in educational investments and the formulas created to equitably allocate these funds. Even after these reductions, funding for School Aid would still total $20.7 billion in 2009-10, a 42 percent or $6.2 billion increase compared to 2003-04.


The Executive Budget also proposes a mandate relief package to allow districts to reduce costs and adjust to the changing economic climate and the evolving needs of their communities.


“The decision to recommend a reduction in School Aid is a personally difficult one for me,” said Governor Paterson. “During my time in the Legislature, I was one of the strongest advocates for increased education funding. The grim reality of our current fiscal situation is that all areas of State spending will have to experience reductions. But I am assured in the knowledge that, even after these actions, New York will still have one of the best-funded education systems in the nation.”


Two years ago, the State adopted a new Foundation Aid formula, which has successfully allocated the vast majority of school operational funding based on equitable and objective measures of student need and districts. financial abilities to meet those needs. The Executive Budget maintains the Foundation Aid formula.


Significant funding increases in Foundation Aid and Universal Prekindergarten were scheduled to be phased-in over a four-year period with a complete phase-in occurring in the 2010-11 school year. Reflecting the need to adapt to plummeting State revenues and a new fiscal environment, this phase-in period will be extended to eight years . with a full phase-in occurring in the 2014-15 school year. When Foundation Aid was originally enacted in 2007-08, the State had a prior year surplus of $1.5 billion. In 2008-09, New York faces a two-year shortfall of $15.4 billion.


Governor Paterson said, “Despite these difficult times, I remain firmly committed to the $7 billion educational investment plan begun in the 2007-08 budget. But we have to take prudent actions to adjust our spending and adapt to unprecedented fiscal difficulties.”


Formula-based School Aid savings are achieved through three main steps. These steps, combined with reductions and eliminations of categorical programs, result in a $698 million or 3.3 percent year-to-year reduction in total School Aid:



  • First, certain School Aid funding categories, including Foundation Aid and Universal Prekindergarten (UPK), will be maintained at 2008-09 levels for two years (2009-10 and 2010-11);

  • Second, unlike Foundation Aid and UPK, some School Aid allocations such as Building Aid, Transportation Aid, and others will not be limited to 2008-09 levels and will change year-to-year based on existing statutory provisions. Funding for these aid categories is projected to have a net increase of $462 million in 2009-10; and

  • Third, in 2009-10, a one-time $1.1 billion Deficit Reduction Assessment (DRA) would be taken against total formula-based aids excluding Building Aid and Universal Prekindergarten. The DRA is structured progressively so that school districts with the greatest needs and least ability to pay receive the smallest percentage reductions in aid. Individual school district reductions will range between 3 and 13 percent.

Finally, a number of categorical grant programs are reduced or eliminated to prevent further reductions in direct aid to schools.


School districts have reported over $1.3 billion of uncommited reserves for the 2009-10 school year, which have been building up over time. Over 87 percent of districts reported unreserved balances in excess of their proposed year-to-year reduction in School Aid.


Governor Paterson has also proposed mandate relief measures to help school districts manage proposed reductions. These measures include the following:



  • Exempting School Districts from the Wicks Law. School Districts will be exempted from Wicks Law requirements for the next five years.

  • Modifying the Contract for Excellence. For the 2009-10 school year, all 39 districts currently in the program can reduce Contract for Excellence program expenditures from 2008-09 levels by the same percentage as their deficit reduction assessment, but must remain in the program unless all schools in the district have improved their performance and are found to be in good standing.

  • Allowing Districts to Access Certain Reserve Funds. This proposal would allow districts to withdraw limited amounts of excess funds in an employee benefits accrued liability reserve fund (with the approval of the State comptroller) to maintain educational programming in the 2009-10 school year.

  • Reforming Pensions. The budget would remove pension enhancements added after the creation of the Tier IV retirement category, which will allow districts to reduce growth in their pension costs . one of the fastest growing local government cost drivers.

  • Reforming Procurement. This would allow school districts additional contracting flexibility by increasing existing bidding thresholds and allowing them to piggyback onto existing contracts.

  • Reducing Paperwork. This proposal would streamline existing reporting requirements and eliminate required reports that are outdated or no longer serve a public policy purpose.

  • Delaying the Effective Date of Mandates. Any new mandate with a cost would not be implemented sooner than the following school year to allow districts the opportunity to build those costs into their budgets.

Other major budget actions in the area of education include:



  • Reduce/Eliminate Categorical Programs: Funding for several categorical grant programs would be reduced or eliminated to prevent further reductions in direct aid to schools. These include the elimination of $40 million for the Teacher Centers Program, which provide professional development; the elimination of a $10 million Teacher Mentor Intern Program, which pays for substitute teachers to allow more experienced teachers to leave the classroom to mentor new teachers; a 50 percent reduction from $12 million to $6 million for a special grant for the Roosevelt School District, which has an operating surplus reported by the Office of the State Comptroller; the elimination of a $10 million program to provide summer math and science programs at colleges and universities; and the elimination of $2 million in funding for the Rochester Children’s Zone, which is attempting to introduce the community schools model in that city. While these programs may provide valuable enhancements to core operations and programs, the Governor’s proposal focuses limited school aid resources on direct funding for school operations.

  • Preschool Special Education: Although school districts are the primary decision-makers for preschool special education services, they have no financial responsibility for that program. To better align fiscal and programmatic responsibilities, school districts will be responsible for a 15 percent share of preschool special education costs, reducing the State share from 59.5 percent to 47 percent of program costs and the county share from 40.5 percent to 38 percent. After this action, State funding for preschool special education will total $590 million
  • Eliminate Comprehensive Attendance Program (CAP) for Non-Public Schools: The current mandate for nonpublic schools to participate in the comprehensive attendance program will be eliminated, as will the State’s financial responsibility ($44 million) to reimburse nonpublic schools for CAP costs incurred in prior school years. Nonpublic schools would continue to receive over $80 million in aid for other mandated services, including traditional attendance-taking, as well as other support for student instructional costs.

A full list of education programs impacted by the Executive Budget can be found at: www.budget.state.ny.us.

Posted in Uncategorized