Being Outside Shoveling Snow in Cold Improves Focus, Memory

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR OUTDOOR LIFE. From University of Michigan News Service.(EDITED) December 19, 2008: With White Plains experiencing its first snowfall of the season Friday of 6 inches falling at the WPCNR News Tower as of 9:30 P.M., and turning roads into slow-going treacherous circumlocutions, shovelers tonight can take heart: Being outside, helps improve your focus—even when it’s cold out.



A really “white” White Plains viewed from the WPCNR News Tower 4:30 P.M. The six inch snow job made traveling treacherous, bumper to bumper on Route 119 and there were a lot of fender benders motorists reported to WPCNR surrounding the city. Kids tomorrow will be saying, “Look out slopes, here I come.”




Researchers believe the findings could have broader impact on helping people who may be suffering from mental fatigue (from perhaps listening to  too many Common Council meetings,  County Board of Legislators meetings, Board of Education meetings, work sessions, news network and financial radio station commentators, seated Senators offering comments,  Assemblymen and State Senators worrying about cuts,  CEOs crying for money,  and Senator Wanna-Be’s saying how they want to give something back by serving into the Senate.)

“Interacting with nature can have similar effects as meditating,” Berman said. “People don’t have to enjoy the walk to get the benefits. We found the same benefits when it was 80 degrees and sunny over the summer as when the temperatures dropped to 25 degrees in January. The only difference was that participants enjoyed the walks more in the spring and summer than in the dead of winter.”

Kaplan and his wife, Rachel Kaplan, a researcher in psychology and the School of Natural Resources and Environment, argue that people are far more likely to be satisfied with their lives when their environment supports three basic needs: the ability to understand and explore; to feel they make a difference; and to feel competent and effective.

Berman decided to test that theory by sending study participants on walking routes around Ann Arbor. Participants walked on an urban route down main streets and also on a route in U-M’s Matthaei Botanical Gardens and Nichols Arboretum, taking in nature. When participants walked in the Arboretum, they improved their short-term memory by 20 percent, but showed no improvements after walking down city streets.

The researchers also tested the same theory by having subjects sit inside and look at pictures of either downtown scenes or nature scenes and again the results were the same: when looking at photos of nature, memory and attention scores improved by about 20 percent, but not when viewing the urban pictures.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Mayor Disputes Charge He Refused to Meet with Boykin/Malmud on Contract B4 Vote

Hits: 0

WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT. From The Mayor’s Office. December 18, 2008: Mayor Joseph Delfino’s office has issued the following statement clarifying the exchange between Councilpersons Rita Malmud and Benjamin Boykin regarding Mrs. Malmud’s request for a meeting with the Mayor before Wednesday’s rejection vote.



Mayor Joseph Delfino clarifies Boykin-Malmud-Delfino interchange on the Police-Fire Contract. File Photo of Mayor, taken October 24, 2008


The Mayor’s Office released this statement Thursday afternoon from Melissa Lopez, the Mayor’s press officer:


The Mayor had asked me to contact you to let you know that the statement made by Councilwoman Malmud is incorrect. 


Ben Boykin and Rita Malmud did in fact contact the Mayor for a meeting but the Mayor did not deny meeting with them instead he requested that he does not meet solely with just two members of the council.  He suggested that Ben and Rita contact their fellow cou`ncil members and schedule a time where they could all meet with the Mayor.  No one ever called the Mayor back.

Posted in Uncategorized

Councilman Boykin Issues Statement on Contract NIX: Flexibility Needed.

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE EXAMINER. December 18, 2008: Councilman Benjamin Boykin, who joined with Councilpersons  Milagros Lecuona, Rita Malmud, Dennis Power and Tom Roach to defeat the union-ratified Police/Fire contract Wednesday evening issued this statement to WPCNR Thursday evening:



Councilman Benjamin Boyin. August 5, 2008



The Common Council voted 5 to 2 to turn down the proposed Police and Fire union contracts negotiated between the Mayor and the unions.

The reason for turning down the contracts relate to the term of the contracts and salary increase amounts given the economic situation of the city and the general economic environment. With the city laying off employees, closing the library on Fridays, reducing the current year budget by $4.0 million and cutting back on some services, financial flexibility is critical to our city’s long term financial viability.


(More)



Under the city charter, the Mayor is charged with negotiations with the unions. The Common Council can accept/reject the proposed settlements.

In early December, I called the Mayor’s office and requested that Councilwoman Malmud and I meet with the Mayor to provide some comments on the contracts that were presented to us in November. The Mayor did not want to meet with us.

We have a wonderful police and firefighters in our city. They are top notch and professional. They protect the public and safety of our city.

The salary settlements included in the contracts are generous even in good economic times. We now are facing an economic tsunami and the largest economic crisis since the Great Depression. Economic circumstances have changed and we must adjust to this new fiscal reality. It is critical that our city maintain its financial flexibility in these uncertain and dire economic times. 

I believe that a one year contract with the proposed schedule changes and training changes and an appropriate salary adjustment should be completed. It would provide the unions with an increase in these tough economic times and provide the city with financial flexibility to response to rapidly changing economic situations.

Councilman Ben Boykin

Posted in Uncategorized

Should The Yanks and Mets Be Bailed Out for $450 M More in Loans?

Hits: 0

WPCNR VOICE OF DA FAN. December 18, 2008:  Ahh, the spirit of giving is in the air! As the Associated Press reported two weeks ago, and The New York Times reported several weeks ago, both the Yankees and the Mets who have just signed several high-priced free agent players, the managements of both teams have asked New York City to float them more city financing to finish their new Stadiums, both scheduled to open in April.



This is amazing chutz-pah. Cheeky, even in the midst of the city’s biggest financial crisis since the early 70s (when Abe Beame “knew the buck”).  As if the Yankees and Mets ever contributed anything to the city with their $7 beers, $5 dollar hot dogs and $5 Sodas, $40 nosebleed seats, and decaying ballclubs and lousy baseball last year. And the Yankees are still fighting the city over the right to sack the old Yankee Stadium for the memorabilia profits. Well the Metropolitans and The Yankees sure do know the buck — as well as Goldman Sachs.


The Yankees have asked the city for $259 Million in tax-exempt bonds and $111 Million more in taxable bonds  to be floated on their faux Yankee Stadium in addition to the $940 Million in tax-exempt bondies and $25 Million in taxable municipal bonds for the $1.3 million ball park in the Bronx. These bonds can be resold at a profit by organizations they are issued to.


The Metropolitans are not asking for as much begging for a mere $83 million more over the $615 Million approved for their $800 Million Citi Field (that name still fills me with disgust.)


Shortly after these requests, these financial juggernauts signed pitchers for massive contracts. You could make the case the city owns those new players.


The point of today’s Voice of Da Fan Poll is should the city float this extra financing for these private organizations — whom their managements have said are not for sale and do not need “bailing out?” Vote in the poll on the right.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Rita Malmud on the Contract NIX — Mayor Refused to Meet.

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. December 18, 2008: Councilwoman Rita Malmud has issued this statement to WPCNR on the Common Council 5-2 decision to reject the three year contract ratified by the Police and Fire unions, last night. Here is Ms. Malmud’s statement:


 



Councilwoman Rita Malmud, August 5, 2008


 WPCNR: Would you care to give me a statement on why you and your colleagues rejected the police-fire contract?


 


Councilwoman Rita Malmud: When the City is significantly cutting jobs, programs, and materials, we cannot afford to increase salaries at a rate comparable to when City coffers were richer and the general economy robust.


 WPCNR: 2. What is next? According to the best of your knowledge?

Councilwoman Malmud: Only the Mayor has the State authorized power to negotiate union contracts.  I assume our Mayor will begin talks anew with the unions to find a different resolution that we can all accept.


 

WPCNR: 3. Why did the council not make it’s uncomfortableness with the contract known before scheduling this voter?

Councilwoman Malmud: The Mayor and his staff take many months to negotiate a proposed contract.  After a careful review of limited information given to us only a few weeks ago, Council President Boykin and I asked to meet with Mayor Delfino last week to give  him insight into our own reservations, as well as similar comments we had heard from some of the other Councilmembers.  Mayor Delfino refused to meet with the two of us on this subject.  Council President Boykin and I are acutely aware that we are not negotiators here, only fiscal shepherds.  To comment publicly before the administratively appointed vote date would lend credence to interfering with negotiations.

Posted in Uncategorized

Council Rejects Mayor’s Police-Fire Deal, 5-2. Mediation May Be Next: Wood

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE EXAMINER. Special to WPCNR from Don Hughes. December 17,2008 UPDATED 11:25 P.M. E.S.T.: Before an audience of about 50 firefighters and police officers, the Common Council rejected the 3-year, 3.75%, 4% and 4% contract with work rules changes, presented them by the Mayor,  turning down the contract a vote of 5-2 this evening.


Paul Wood, City Executive Officer in a written statement released to WPCNR tonight said,


“We’re disapointed that what we considered a good contract for the City was rejected. I’ll have to speak to the union and see if we go back to the negotiating table or to mediation. “


Councilpersons Benjamin Boykin,  Milagros Lecouona, Rita Malmud, Dennis Power,  and Tom Roach voted against the contract.   Councilman Glen Hockley and Mayor Joseph Delfino voted for approval of the contract. The contract is reported to have been negotiated exclusively by Mayor Delfino and Executive Officer Paul Wood.


With each councilperson speaking at length on the topic, the major sticking point for the five nay-sayers was length of the contract.


Those five voting against it preferred a one-year contract, instead of committing the city to 4% in both years two and three. It was unclear whether the council members voting against it were comfortable with the 3.75% in the first year.


Paul Wood was queried by WPCNR late Thursday evening on whether any member of the Common Council ever informed the Mayor or him that they only wished to make a one year agreement, and Mr. Wood said, “No.”


No members of the public were permitted to speak for or against the contract. The members of the council appeared to be supportive of the work rules changes in which police would be permitted 12-hour duty tours and firemen 24-hour duty tours.


Councilman Benjamin Boykin rejected Mayor Joseph Delfino’s contention that the rate of inflation was 4.7%, Boykin saying it was 2.7%.  It was unclear at the close of the meeting what the next step on hammering out an agreement would be.


The Council was presented with the agreement in Executive Session four weeks ago on November 12 in Executive Session. Details of the contract were not available to the public until this week when WPCNR reported them


 Councilperson Dennis Power told the Mayor last night,  that Councilpersons Malmud and Boykin wanted to speak with the Mayor about the contract. Delfino said that the Council should have spoken collectively in the work session on the contract.


In a presentation to the Council after the vote on the budget situation, Gina Cuneo-Harwood, the city Financial Officer offered no new revelations on the budget, predicting the city expected a sales tax collection for the year of $50 Million, which would beat the city target of $45 Million. She also said she expected mortgage recording taxes to be down $1.3 Million, also not exactly new news.

Posted in Uncategorized

City Must Clean up Gedney Dump Carcinogen Contamination , DEC Says.

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE DUMP NEWS. By John F. Bailey. December 17, 2008 UPDATED 11:30 P.M. E.S.T.: A press spokesperson from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation told WPCNR today that the DEC has received completed test results of wells testing executed last spring, and that their team of technicians has determined that the TCE-contaminates found in the City Dump are still leaking leachate into the Mamaroneck River in a quantity that requires remediation.


Wendy Rosenbach, spokesperson of the DEC office in New Paltz, told WPCNR a final report is awaited from the city, but regardless of what that reports says, the DEC will require some form of cleanup of the contaminants, the extent of the remediation has yet to be determined. No other information was immediately available, according to Ms. Rosenbach, except that remediation will be required of the city.


Paul Wood, Executive Officer of the city, when asked for a statement on the DEC decison told WPCNR late Thursday evening, “Tomorrow I’ll check with Bud and corp council (Edward Dunphy).” 

Posted in Uncategorized

Governor Cuts School Aid from 3% to 13% Based on Present Formula. Wicks Law OUT

Hits: 0

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. From The Governor’s Press Office. December 17, 2008 (Edited): In a detailed news release, Governor David A. Patterson goes into the specifics of his revision of New York aid to education in his revised 2008-2009 Budget and his 2009-2010 Budget. He calls for school districts to receive state aid based on the school aid formula now in effect, resulting in cuts of 3% to 13% in aid.


The White Plains City School District has been contacted  by WPCNR to see if  it contemplate any  immediate cuts in the currently running 2008-2009 School Budget of $284.4 Million , which has six months and two weeks left as the city has undertaken cuts this week. The School District received a 15% increase in state aid last year, most of which was paid for by the state legislature decreasing (with no publicity on the cut) the STAR Exemption which forced White Plains residents to pay $1 Million of the $1.4 Million in increased school aid.


Another interesting proposal of the Governor’s would suspend the Wicks Law (requiring four separate contractors for every school contracted job, basically) for five years. Here is the Governor’s news release:


The Executive Budget reduces education aid in 2009-10 by $698 million or 3.3 percent from 2008-09 while maintaining a commitment to both long-term increases in educational investments and the formulas created to equitably allocate these funds. Even after these reductions, funding for School Aid would still total $20.7 billion in 2009-10, a 42 percent or $6.2 billion increase compared to 2003-04.


The Executive Budget also proposes a mandate relief package to allow districts to reduce costs and adjust to the changing economic climate and the evolving needs of their communities.


“The decision to recommend a reduction in School Aid is a personally difficult one for me,” said Governor Paterson. “During my time in the Legislature, I was one of the strongest advocates for increased education funding. The grim reality of our current fiscal situation is that all areas of State spending will have to experience reductions. But I am assured in the knowledge that, even after these actions, New York will still have one of the best-funded education systems in the nation.”


Two years ago, the State adopted a new Foundation Aid formula, which has successfully allocated the vast majority of school operational funding based on equitable and objective measures of student need and districts. financial abilities to meet those needs. The Executive Budget maintains the Foundation Aid formula.


Significant funding increases in Foundation Aid and Universal Prekindergarten were scheduled to be phased-in over a four-year period with a complete phase-in occurring in the 2010-11 school year. Reflecting the need to adapt to plummeting State revenues and a new fiscal environment, this phase-in period will be extended to eight years . with a full phase-in occurring in the 2014-15 school year. When Foundation Aid was originally enacted in 2007-08, the State had a prior year surplus of $1.5 billion. In 2008-09, New York faces a two-year shortfall of $15.4 billion.


Governor Paterson said, “Despite these difficult times, I remain firmly committed to the $7 billion educational investment plan begun in the 2007-08 budget. But we have to take prudent actions to adjust our spending and adapt to unprecedented fiscal difficulties.”


Formula-based School Aid savings are achieved through three main steps. These steps, combined with reductions and eliminations of categorical programs, result in a $698 million or 3.3 percent year-to-year reduction in total School Aid:



  • First, certain School Aid funding categories, including Foundation Aid and Universal Prekindergarten (UPK), will be maintained at 2008-09 levels for two years (2009-10 and 2010-11);

  • Second, unlike Foundation Aid and UPK, some School Aid allocations such as Building Aid, Transportation Aid, and others will not be limited to 2008-09 levels and will change year-to-year based on existing statutory provisions. Funding for these aid categories is projected to have a net increase of $462 million in 2009-10; and

  • Third, in 2009-10, a one-time $1.1 billion Deficit Reduction Assessment (DRA) would be taken against total formula-based aids excluding Building Aid and Universal Prekindergarten. The DRA is structured progressively so that school districts with the greatest needs and least ability to pay receive the smallest percentage reductions in aid. Individual school district reductions will range between 3 and 13 percent.

Finally, a number of categorical grant programs are reduced or eliminated to prevent further reductions in direct aid to schools.


School districts have reported over $1.3 billion of uncommited reserves for the 2009-10 school year, which have been building up over time. Over 87 percent of districts reported unreserved balances in excess of their proposed year-to-year reduction in School Aid.


Governor Paterson has also proposed mandate relief measures to help school districts manage proposed reductions. These measures include the following:



  • Exempting School Districts from the Wicks Law. School Districts will be exempted from Wicks Law requirements for the next five years.

  • Modifying the Contract for Excellence. For the 2009-10 school year, all 39 districts currently in the program can reduce Contract for Excellence program expenditures from 2008-09 levels by the same percentage as their deficit reduction assessment, but must remain in the program unless all schools in the district have improved their performance and are found to be in good standing.

  • Allowing Districts to Access Certain Reserve Funds. This proposal would allow districts to withdraw limited amounts of excess funds in an employee benefits accrued liability reserve fund (with the approval of the State comptroller) to maintain educational programming in the 2009-10 school year.

  • Reforming Pensions. The budget would remove pension enhancements added after the creation of the Tier IV retirement category, which will allow districts to reduce growth in their pension costs . one of the fastest growing local government cost drivers.

  • Reforming Procurement. This would allow school districts additional contracting flexibility by increasing existing bidding thresholds and allowing them to piggyback onto existing contracts.

  • Reducing Paperwork. This proposal would streamline existing reporting requirements and eliminate required reports that are outdated or no longer serve a public policy purpose.

  • Delaying the Effective Date of Mandates. Any new mandate with a cost would not be implemented sooner than the following school year to allow districts the opportunity to build those costs into their budgets.

Other major budget actions in the area of education include:



  • Reduce/Eliminate Categorical Programs: Funding for several categorical grant programs would be reduced or eliminated to prevent further reductions in direct aid to schools. These include the elimination of $40 million for the Teacher Centers Program, which provide professional development; the elimination of a $10 million Teacher Mentor Intern Program, which pays for substitute teachers to allow more experienced teachers to leave the classroom to mentor new teachers; a 50 percent reduction from $12 million to $6 million for a special grant for the Roosevelt School District, which has an operating surplus reported by the Office of the State Comptroller; the elimination of a $10 million program to provide summer math and science programs at colleges and universities; and the elimination of $2 million in funding for the Rochester Children’s Zone, which is attempting to introduce the community schools model in that city. While these programs may provide valuable enhancements to core operations and programs, the Governor’s proposal focuses limited school aid resources on direct funding for school operations.

  • Preschool Special Education: Although school districts are the primary decision-makers for preschool special education services, they have no financial responsibility for that program. To better align fiscal and programmatic responsibilities, school districts will be responsible for a 15 percent share of preschool special education costs, reducing the State share from 59.5 percent to 47 percent of program costs and the county share from 40.5 percent to 38 percent. After this action, State funding for preschool special education will total $590 million
  • Eliminate Comprehensive Attendance Program (CAP) for Non-Public Schools: The current mandate for nonpublic schools to participate in the comprehensive attendance program will be eliminated, as will the State’s financial responsibility ($44 million) to reimburse nonpublic schools for CAP costs incurred in prior school years. Nonpublic schools would continue to receive over $80 million in aid for other mandated services, including traditional attendance-taking, as well as other support for student instructional costs.

A full list of education programs impacted by the Executive Budget can be found at: www.budget.state.ny.us.

Posted in Uncategorized

Paul Wood On the Money: Behind the Cuts — Story Behind the Police Fire Deal

Hits: 0

WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT. Interview with City Executive Officer Paul Wood. December 16, 2008: WPCNR interviewed Mayor Joseph Delfino’s Executive Officer on the layoffs announced Monday by the Mayor and the police and fire contracts scheduled to be voted upon by the Common Council this evening. The Police and Fire unions assume a 12-hour duty tour and 24-hour duty tour with first year raises of 3.75% and second and third year raises of 4% in the new contracts. Mr. Wood discussed with WPCNR the cuts in the workforce first, and the union settlement second. Here is that interview:



Paul Wood, Executive Officer. City of White Plains.


 


 


WPCNR: On the job cuts, how will the work done by the part-time persons being let go be handled?


Paul Wood: We changed full-time positions hours to cover the cuts in the  part-time positions. You saw what happened in Yonkers, now everybody’s crying that they laid off 300 people. If we don’t do anything, we get  criticized us for doing nothing, if we do something, we it’s going to be painful, and we’re trying to minimize the pain, but if we were doing nothing, everybody’d be screaming we were doing nothing.


WPCNR: Would the part-time workers being replaced by hours, does that mean overtime for the full-time workers?


Paul Wood: No absolutely not – in their work schedules. They’ll be working regular time.


WPCNR: There’s supposedly a hiring freeze, does that mean the Budget Analyst advertised for is not going to be hired?


Paul Wood: The only position that’s been released to be hired is the Budget Analyst. ( Advertised  last Sunday at $56,000)


WPCNR: Are you planning on keeping David Birdsall as Acting Budget Director?


Paul Wood: Let’s look at it this way too, John:  $300,000 was cut from the reserve by the Democrats (Councilmen). We voted against our own budgeYes. Mr. Birdsall as the acting Budget Director. We had a very good Budget Analyst (Sandra Bullock) who left us to become treasurer in Cortlandt. She was the last one standing. I can’t function like that. The Council doesn’t want to consolidate the departments and yet when we go and try and go and create a budget department, then they’re angry about that and  so it’s damned if you do and damned if you don’t.t. That money may have been able to fund these part-time positions.  That’s where the anger should be.


WPCNR: Why cannot you use Undesignated Fund balance to cover?


Paul Wood: We can’t use (undesignated) fund balance until we run a deficit. It’s against the law. So, I can’t go into fund balance now and fund the position. It has to wait until we’re running a deficit, then I can go into fund balance, but that $300,000 that was cut from the reserve may have lessened the pain.


I feel bad for Recs and Parks the most because they got caught midseason. You asked why we chose to do this at this time. Two years ago we did the same thing, mid-year cuts.  Obviously as I said, people would be screaming and hollering that we did nothing, if we did nothing, even if  though there’s no tangible evidence (of a deficit). We’re just going by intuition. We feel revenues are going to be down. That’s something we cannot control. But, what we can control is the expense side. If we didn’t do anything people would be yelling and screaming. When we do something, people are yelling and screaming. It’s damned if you do and damned if you don’t again, so it’s like we’re preparing for the worst and hoping for the best. Unfortunately they, Ebersole got caught in the middle, all Rec and Parks had left was basketball and Ebersole (rink programs). There wasn’t any other places to go (to cut).


WPCNR: Does the Rec Department pay for any parades?


Paul Wood: The parades are all paid for by their own sponsors.


 WPCNR: What did the Rec Department  spend on the first six months?


Wood: Camps, concerts, noontime concerts. More sporting activity in the parks during the summer. That’s why I’m saying if we have the opportunity next budget season, to examine their whole budget, rather than in a six month time slot, some of these (eliminated part-time) positions will be returned.


WPCNR: How much is the city spending on the New Year’s Eve Ball Drop?


Wood: $12,000.


WPCNR How much is the city saving dropping these part-time persons?


Wood: Ebersole alone is about $20,000. The DPW, six workers, $35,000.


WPCNR: Are the Commissioners and Deputy Commissoners going to take any pay cuts?


Paul Wood: No. I can’t do that.


WPCNR: Why not?


Wood: Because their salaries are set at the beginning of the year.


WPCNR: Well, that doesn’t stop us from cutting it.


Paul Wood: Why do you think they’re overpaid? They’re underpaid.


WPCNR: I didn’t say that. I asked. They make far more than these part-time workers so I would think  a cut would hurt them less than the part-time workers.


Paul Wood: And we’d lose a lot of good people (Commissioners). Most of the Commissioners and Deputy Commissioners work 12 hour days. The majority of them took a pay cut, I consider it a pay cut,  last year because they didn’t get a pay raise as the same rate of inflation (3% was the raise). And inflation has been up over 4 forever.


WPCNR: Not really, Paul.


Paul Wood: It was over four, only in the last year. If you get a raise of 3% and there are some months 5.7% and 4.7% then it’s 2.7% less than you worked the previous year for. Contrary to what everyone says, o.k.?, we’re not giving raises that outpace inflation. It’s been made up by somebody. It’s just not true.


The other thing is, why don’t we cut the management. This city has grown by 7,000 people. That’s a village in this county. We’ve got less people (because we’ve got a hiring freeze on), doing more work , including police and firemen by the way. That fire (at 20 N. Broadway) could have been a major disaster. They did excellent work. 


I’ve got one person in the budget department, for crying out loud. Gina (Cuneo-Harwood) did all that work for two years and it nearly killed her. And she had two other people in the budget department. Everyone has left because the salaries elsewhere are better. I lost my budget analyst to Cortlandt, you know why? The salary was better.


I’m not cutting salaries on persons who are working their fingers to the bone here, in a city that’s grown by 10,000 people where we have less of a head count (on the payroll) than we had ten years ago, because we’re not hiring people. It would be absolutely ludicrous to say we’re going to start cutting salaries. Who’s going to work here? You’re not going to have anybody left. There’s no fat. That’s the problem. There simply is not a lot of fat here (in the budget). There’s more activity. With a hiring freeze on they’re working twice as hard.


WPCNR: Is the City Budget 08-09 running a deficit at this time?


Wood: No.


WPCNR: Then these cuts are in anticipation?


Wood: Yes.


WPCNR: So if we are on target, than why cut?


Wood: If we do nothing and end the year with a huge deficit, people are going to say we sat around here and did nothing.


WPCNR: But you have the fund balance to make that up?


Wood: Don’t forget we budgeted fund balance the more of that that gets eaten up means there’s less fund balance to put in next year’s budget, then after that, God forbid, we have another bad year we end up with no fund balance.


WPCNR: But what good is an (undesignated) fund balance doing, doing nothing?


Wood: The fund balance that we allocated to 2008-2009 was about 9 or 10 Million dollars some of that will definitely get used up and we’ll still probably have to run a deficit. You can’t be in a position we’re in and go in to fund balance. It just has to run a deficit and then we’ll have to use some more fund balance in next year’s budget. You’re right. We should be using fund balance now in the time of a recession. That’s what it’s there for. People refer to it as a rainy day fund, and it’s raining like Hell, so there’s no reason not to use it.


WPCNR: Couldn’t that be used now?


Wood: No, because you don’t get all your numbers in til the end of the year.


WPCNR: Since you’re not running a deficit…?


Wood: But we’re very confident we will be running a deficit by year end, that I can assure you.


WPCNR: When will you know what the deficit is?


Wood: Probably won’t know anything definitive until April or May, and even then we won’t definitively know.


WPCNR: There’s no way the city cannot take a short term bond, (rather than lay off)?


Wood: No. You can’t bond for jobs.


WPCNR: There must be some financial instrument … you’ve explored all avenues of apparently what is a short term cash problem.


Paul Wood: It may be. In July, or April,  when we do the new budget, we may be hiring back some of these people. Some of these people laid off from Ebersole will be working for us in the summer any way. We’re worried about $20,000 at Ebersole. It doesn’t sound like much but it is. It contributes. There are no sacred cows. I can’t have one department be pained and another one left untouched, just because everybody loves the rink. The fact is that everyone should be jumping for joy that we’re reinventing government here by saving part-time salaries, changing the schedules of full time employees and having them cover, so there’s very little minimal impact to our services so that the public is not getting reduced services, it’s just that we’re having our full people work different hours – which they’re not happy about by the way. That’s too bad. They are lucky they have jobs at this point. In order not to reduce full-time jobs. They have longer time with the city. They move into another department and bump another person out. You don’t want to do that to full-time employees. One of the mayor’s best friends is affected by these cuts. We don’t like doing it.


WPCNR: So if the city was in such good shape in August, how come we have to cut now?


Paul Wood: If we don’t do anything  now, ok, by the time we get the bad news, how much we’re going to run a deficit, all the departments will have spent all their money and there will be nothing to pull back. So we have to do it in anticipation that we’re going to have a bad year here. We can’t….we’re not an island. If Yonkers laid off 300 full time employees, Mount Vernon’s laying off people, everyone, New Rochelle, same thing. There’s things that everyone is doing because the economy is obviously in a tailspin. We cannot anticipate, although our sales tax was up, which is fantastic, god willing and everything being equal, we’re on budget, and we don’t have to make the cuts we have to make. As you can see from the Mayor’s memo,   we have to reinvent the way we do things we just can’t keep raising taxes. We have to look at operations and how we can save money for the future. We’ve got to look at long term solutions, not just emergency, got to do it.


The Rec department unfortunately already had programs under the way. The DPW six part-timers, we hire them every season, and they’re not going to be hired. We’re not going to open the Renaissance Square Fountain for a month. The same guys that prepare the ballfields will come back and prepare the ball fields first then come back and open the fountain.


 


THE POLICE AND FIRE SETTLEMENT


WPCNR: In light of the belt tightening, what is the justification for the police and fire settlements?


Paul Wood: That’s very easy. First of all the numbers are well  below the CPI which is 4.72%. You want to go to mediation on that, and come walking away with a 4.72. I don’t think so.


WPCNR: But that is only very recent that number…


Paul Wood: It’s only been very recent, it was up to 5.7 two months ago. But you go to mediation and they look at the snapshot, and they look at the economy and of course they’re going to say, got to give them 4s and 4-1/2s.


Number 2 they made a ton of concessions. When you look at the contract we have, they started out with  a list of 20-24 items,  each one (union) including longevity, which is normally given in a contract. They wanted  additional money for tuitions. They wanted a host of things.


We began to talk about the schedule. With the schedule change (12 Hour tours for police) I get on police 2 to 4 extra police per shift, O.K.? That ‘s like hiring four to eight extra cops that I’m not going to have to hire. That’s 4 to 8 cops. That’s a lot of money


With  the firemen, they made a major concession, both did, on training. We were spending a load of money on overtime, because they had to pay these guys overtime when they were on training, which was ridiculous. Both police and fire removed that from their contracts. That’s going to save a ton of money.


Firemen gave up one extra day, when we figure that out over the year that works out to hiring almost two more firemen. Two more salaries,  two more firemen. We have two more on the streetThat’s fantastic. I put more on the street. I can run at a higher vacancy rate which we are doing. The money that that saves us is incredible. Six cops, benefits and salary, that about $400,000, $500,000. Two firemen, that’s $200,000 right there. So that alone helps us, the work changes, schedule changes.


We used the schedule changes (12 hour tours for Police; 24 Hour tours for firemen), as bargaining chip to do away with 14 other items.


When you look at the CSEA contract that the county gave out, when you look a similar police and fire contracts that were settled at the same amounts or more, than what we’re proposing to settle at, you will see longevity increases.   That affects everybody. That’s where they hide the percentage, so when you say Greenburgh or the CSEA got a 3.5% increase, no they didn’t, they got a 4-1/2% increase because they got a bump in longevity and they got all those other perks that are hidden in those contracts.


They’re getting nothing here, absolutely nothing. The only thing they are getting is a differential for managerial, like lieutenants and captains, (1%) and that is only to make them equal to most of the other cities in the county. Right now, White Plains police and fire are toward the bottom of the scale of salaries across the board for the cities and towns we look at.


If you recall eight or nine years ago, we had a thing called badge drain. That’s what we’re afraid of. We don’t want to start investing hundreds of thousands of dollars in police and firemen then having them leave the city to go somewhere else because they’re so well trained. This increase will only put them in the middle of the scale of where we’ve surveyed.


It’s also, when you look around, not unthinkable, these increases. They’re on par with what everyone else is getting, they’re below CPI, unlike a letter writer who keeps complaining we’re giving raises beyond the rate of inflation. The Hell we are. That’s not true. Not true. It’s over four. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  If you go to mediation at this snapshot in time.


This is one helluva contract. There are only four things on the table and none of them  are significant. In fact, the amount of money this will save on overtime, the training concessions the unions made, they gave up increases in longevity.


Their contract by the way is considered the model contract. They say every contract in the city should be like the police, who contribute towards their medical. You can’t ask two unions, who are the model contract on medical benefits, to cut back on their medical insurance. That’s ridiculous, you’d get laughed out of the room. They’re saying look, we’re the model and this is one of the reasons why we wanted to settle with them, because they are the model (on medical benefits), and that’s what we intend to do.


WPCNR: If this contract has them giving so much,  as you say, why did they accept it?


Paul Wood: A couple of reasons. They realize the hard economic times we’re in. Number two, the chart changes not only work very well for the administraton. They also work very well for the individual, fire fighter or police. They wanted the chart (schedule) changes. So we used it as a bargaining chip. When Commissioner (Frank) Straub did the analysis, we figured we could do this, and were able to offer that, everything else came off the table. Because this is what they’ve been seeking for years.


Seventy-five per cent of all fire departments operate on this schedule. Policemen do 12 hour shifts throughout the country. It started in California and it’s been continuing. We have some police on 12 hour shifts. We have 12, 10, 8 hour shifts. They say it gives them additional time off. They don’t have to go back to work for 12 hours. It was  a bargaining chip we used. But it also works extremely well for the city.  It allows us to cut back on hiring and gives us and extra 1.6 firemen. And the training was killing us on overtime – a major concession on their part.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

$100,000 Scoreboard Arrives. Looks Good. Next Kickoff: September 2009

Hits: 0

WPCNR Photo of the Day. By the WPCNR Roving Photographer. December 16, 2008: The new Daktronics scoreboard for Loucks Field was installed at Loucks Field at the White Plains High School Tuesday, and it looks really good, although it is a month late in delivery. The matrix, computer-controlled,  Daktronics scoreboard, purchased by the school district for $104,000 has computer template “packages” enabling the electronic marvel to “score” football games, soccer/field hockey/lacrosse and track and field. It has has instant replay capability, and excellent visibility. The WPCNR Roving Photographer captured its debut while a Daktronics technician was hooking up the wiring Tuesday afternoon.


Now Scoring for the Tigers….



The blue matrix below the orange, Glenn D. Loucks Field strip, is a computer message board capable of instant replay, videos, and of course score setups for football, track, soccer/field hockey/lacrosse.



View from the 50 Yard Line.

Posted in Uncategorized