Governor Cuomo Swears In former Westchester County D.A. Janet DiFiore as Chief Court of Appeals Judge

Hits: 358

Janet DiFiore, former Westchester County District Attorney being sworn in at the Court of Appeals Monday

WPCNR FOR THE RECORD. Governer Andrew Cuomo’s remarks at DiFiore Swearing-In Ceremony on Monday, February 8. From the Governor’s Office February 9. 2016:

This is, as I understand, one of the largest crowds that has ever been assembled for an event such as today and I think that is a metaphor for the person who we are going to swear-in today. There is no one who Janet DiFiore has met, who has worked with her, or who has been on the other side of the table, who doesn’t have a deep respect for her and I think this turnout reflects just that.

To all of my colleagues, my statewide colleagues, the Attorney General, the Comptroller, my Counsel, the elected officials who are here, law enforcement – I will not try to replicate Judge Pickett’s list, who I believe was exhausted.

But to Janet’s family, because public service is a family affair and Janet could not have accomplished what she accomplished if she didn’t have a family who sacrificed and who was there with her day-in and day-out and I know that from personal experiences. So let’s give the DiFiore Family a round of applause. Headed by Dennis Glazer, who is the head of the family.

Today is a special day. It is an exciting day, it is an historic day, and it is also an emotional day for many reasons, as you’ve heard. We are gathered together in what is one of the nation’s most beautiful shrines to justice in this Court of Appeals to swear-in the new Chief Judge. Our Court of Appeals has been a cornerstone of the American system of jurisprudence. It has a proud legacy of accomplishments and leadership. It has led the nation with groundbreaking decisions right here, such as People v. Donovan, the precursor to Miranda v. Arizona, protecting the right against self-incrimination; Chamberlin v. Andrews, which advanced the concept of activist government in the constitutionality of unemployment benefits, which was upheld during the Great Depression. And Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad, every first-year law student’s favorite tort case on proximate cause. I want you to know, I am now with the Long Island Rail Road.

2016209difiore 005

Chief Justice DiFiore being applauded after taking her oath

 

This court is the legacy of John Jay, a founding father of this state, this nation and our courts, and our court system, and by the way, a Westchester resident which I think is a good omen. The court developed under the leadership of some of the best in the country: Benjamin Cardozo, Frederick Crane, Stanley Fuld and Charles Breitel. Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, who retired last year after serving nearly half a century on the courts and left each court better than he found it. We owe him a special thank you. Thank you Judge Lippman.

Chief Judge Judith Kaye, the first woman on the court, the first female Chief Judge, a true trailblazer. I remember the selection process for Judith Kay and I remember what she went through as a trailblazer. It was not easy for her. But she persevered and she succeeded. She was referred to as the “Mother of Justice,” and Judith brought dignity and honor to the role as she transformed the system to address domestic violence, substance abuse and mental illness. Her lasting contributions to this court include reimagining the jury system. She called it jury service, not jury duty. And she was right.

Today, we stand on the shoulders of those giants who came before and we honor their legacy by reaching even higher in our pursuit of justice.

Appointments to the Court of Appeals are one of my most important duties for the Governor of the state. I am the 56th Governor of New York but I will be one of only two Governors in the history of the state to have appointed an entire court. The other governor was the 52nd Governor of the State of New York, the Honorable Mario Matthew Cuomo. Now I thought it would be impressive to have achieved that in just six years – until I found out that my father did it in five. And trust me, he would have really appreciated that bit of trivia at the dinner table.

My father loved the court, he began his career here as a clerk. He brought me here when I was twelve years old. He was in private practice and he brought me to hear him argue a case and the impression of this grandeur courtroom struck me even then. This court is easy to love. This courtroom itself shows us its stature – it is graced with powerful portraits, each beautiful in its own right, bringing its own perspective and quality. But the portraits are even more beautiful, even more powerful, as a collective. So too with the judges who now serve on this bench.

2016209difiore 007

Chief Judge DiFiori and Governor Andrew Cuomo share a light moment

 

Each one a superb portrait of judicial excellence and public service and even more powerful and magnificent in their assembly. The members of the court reflect the New York experience. They’re from all across the state, and bring experience as advocates, politicians, practitioners; prosecutors, civil rights and worker rights advocates, and administrators. And they have lived New York: the opportunities and the obstacles, the promise and the peril. As Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said, “The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience.” This court reflects that experience.

Today we see the complete court becoming clearer. As we sit here today, across the street Michael Garcia is going through his hearings before the State Senate to see that he is confirmed. He is fulfilling the vacancy left by the retirement of Judge Susan Read, who served with dedication and honor. Let’s give her a round of applause.

Now the newspapers have speculated why I might have chosen Mike for the nomination – if there was something special about Mike. Just between us, I’ll tell you right now, there is something special about Mike. No Governor named Cuomo would believe the court is complete without a boy from Queens. That I can tell you. Toward the end of this year Judge Pigott will retire.

He has served on every level of our courts; served with distinction in Vietnam. He has made Buffalo proud and he still makes Buffalo proud. His tenure as the acting chief judge – while brief – has been superlative. The court was unified, in fact there were no dissenting opinions, there was no disharmony, no negative press, and most importantly, he kept the court within the 2 percent spending cap. I hope the next chief judge follows your lead. Thank you Judge Pigott. We all owe you a debt of gratitude. Thank you [inaudible].

At the end of this year, I will have my last selection for the court. The last piece in this beautiful mosaic. I’m thinking about who the nominee should be already. It should be a person who has a dynamic personality. A person for whom the appointment is clearly a raise in stature, and a person who would get a hefty raise in compensation by moving into the position. There’s really only one choice. I’m thinking of nominating myself. I am sure the Senate would quickly confirm to create the vacancy.

2016209difiore 008

Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals Janet DiFiore addressing the court.

Today the business at hand is the investiture of chief judge Janet DiFiore. Now while the commission’s list was excellent, it did not take me a long time to make a decision. Janet was the obvious and clear choice for this position. She is uniquely qualified to fulfill this demanding role – and it is, as Judge Pigott pointed out. Her professional credentials and experience combined with her personal skill and integrity equip her to not only manage but to excel in this multifaceted position of chief judge of the court of appeals.

The breadth of Janet’s experience is impressive. She started as an assistant district attorney in Westchester County; she spent six years in private practice; and then she returned to the DA’s office as chief of the narcotics bureau. In 1998, she stood before the people and she was elected to the Westchester County court. In 2002, she was elected to the Supreme Court and while there, served as supervising judge of the criminal courts with the Eighth Judicial District, eliminating a backlog of criminal cases – the first district in the state to do so.

In 2005, Janet DiFiore was elected Westchester County DA, prosecuting about 40,000 cases per year. She was re-elected twice.

Janet has been a true champion for preventing and reversing wrongful convictions. She secured an individual’s release after 16 years in prison based on DNA evidence and then she recommended a series of reforms to protect the innocent. As a prosecutor, she never forgot her job was to do justice – not amass convictions. She would inculpate or exculpate depending only on the facts. Janet was the first to head JCOPE, getting the agency on its feet.

​​Janet DiFiore will not only be Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals but she’s also Chief Judge of the state of New York, a position created in 1977 to address the rampant inefficiencies and backlogs in our courts. As Chief Judicial Officer, Janet will oversee a $2 billion budget with 19,000 employees. She has the leadership skills and the management credentials to streamline and manage that bureaucracy.

It’s not just that positions that Janet has held that qualifies her for this position. It’s not even her performance in those positions. Even more, it is who she is as a person. Janet’s career has never been about Janet – it has always been about the public she serves. That, my friends, is the key to Janet’s success. She’ll make this court a better court and she will write the next chapter of judicial progress into the history books.

Judith Kaye said that the Court of Appeals was “lawyer heaven.” And it is true. This court may be heaven on earth for a lawyer. But I think heaven above has recently acquired a couple of pretty good lawyers in Judith Kaye and Mario Cuomo and I am sure they are both together today, and they are looking down on us, and they are watching us in this ceremony and I am sure they are smiling – because they know we have not let them down, that they taught us well, we learned from their example, and today we honor their life, their love and their legacy in the appointment of Janet DiFiore as Chief Judge of this magnificent court.

Posted in Uncategorized

What is Status of Commissioner of Public Safety? City Places Ad for New Commissioner,

Hits: 370

2016207commish 010

WPCNR POLICE GAZETTE. FEBRUARY 7, 2016:

THE CITY OF WHITE PLAINS ADVERTISED TODAY IN THE JOURNAL NEWS SUNDAY JOBS SECTION FOR “COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY.” SALARY LISTED IS FOR $190,103.

STIPULATIONS INCLUDE THE CANDIDATE MUST HAVE A B.A. IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND M.A. IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE OR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND 10 YEARS OF INCREASINGLY RESPONSIBLE POLICE EXPERIENCE, INCLUDING 5 YEARS AS CHIEF OR HIGHER LEVEL INVOLVED IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY IN A LARGE MUNICIPALITY WITH A POLICE FIRE FORCE OF OVER 200.

RESUMES AND COVER LETTER ARE DUE BY FEBRUARY 24.

THE STATUS OF DAVID CHONG, WHITE PLAINS COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY SINCE 2010, AND PRIOR TO THAT, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY UNDER COMMISSIONER FRANK STRAUB, IS UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME.

 

Posted in Uncategorized

WHITE PLAINS WEEK ON YOUTUBE NOW–ON THE INTERNET–AND TONIGHT AT 7:30 ON FIOS CHANNEL 45 AND CABLEVISION CHANNEL 76

Hits: 103

 

 

 

 

 

BACK TONIGHT!

WHITE PLAINS WEEK WORLDWIDE 

RKOTower

ON

YOU TUBE AT

AND AT
www.whiteplainsweek.com

 FASNY STAYS ON THE TABLE, DOES NOT HIT FLOOR.

COUNCIL’S PUZZLING VOTE ANALYZED.

THE NEW WHITE PLAINS PAVILION PROJECT APPROVED AFTER LESS THAN ONE YEAR OF REVIEW–START DATE UNCERTAIN

ESPLANADE SAYS ONLY 21 RESIDENTS AT SENIOR COMPLEX NEED PLACES TO LIVE. COUNCIL SAYS THEY WILL NOT STAND IN WAY OF ESPLANADE REZONING.

NEW CITY CENTER OWNERS DESCRIBE UPGRADES THEY WANT TO DO–SAY RESTAURANTS WILL NOT RENT UNLESS THEY HAVE RETURN TO VALET PARKING.

TRANSCENTER COMMUNITY INPUT REQUESTED AT LIBRARY, FEBRUARY 11

PETER KATZ, JOHN BAILEY, JIM BENEROFE

TONIGHT

2015710WPW 037

Posted in Uncategorized

WHITE PLAINS DPW-ON TOP OF FIRST FEBRUARY SNOWFALL…SNOW ENDING NOONISH

Hits: 125

The National Weather Service as of 8 A.M notes: There will be Snow, mainly before 11am. High near 36. Wind chill values between 20 and 25. North wind 15 to 17 mph, with gusts as high as 29 mph. Chance of precipitation is 90%. Total daytime snow accumulation of 2 to 4 inches possible.
Friday night:
Clear, with a low around 24. Northwest wind 8 to 13 mph becoming light after midnight.
Side roads have been groomed as of 8 AM  by the White Plains DPW “Hope Crew” and school is open.
Posted in Uncategorized

OPIOID ABUSE INCREASE CALLS FOR TIGHTER REGULATION OF PRESCRIPTIONS FOR PAINKILLERS, SENATOR GILLEBRAND REPORTS. ASKS FOR GUIDELINES.

Hits: 95

WPCNR CAPITOL HILL. FROM THE OFFICE OF NY SENATOR KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND. FEBRUARY 5, 2016:

  U.S. Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) today urged the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to issue guidelines for doctors prescribing opioids for acute pain.

Currently, the CDC is only focused on guidelines for opioids prescribed to treat chronic pain. However, many individuals become addicted to opioids after taking prescriptions for acute pain. Acute pain includes pain following a broken bone, wisdom tooth extraction, or other surgeries, whereas chronic pain is long-term pain often from chronic conditions. 


“For many people, difficulties with opioid addiction began after receiving a prescription for acute pain. Many people with acute pain haven’t had previous opioid exposure and may be at heightened risk for addiction, and opioids prescribed for acute pain frequently end up being inappropriately given or sold to other individuals for recreational use. By updating the prescribing guidelines for acute pain, we can minimize the initial exposure to opioid medications and further limit the number of opioid prescriptions,” the Senators said.

 

Senators Gillibrand and Capito have continued to push for reforms to combat opioid abuse. They are cosponsors of numerous bills that would address opioid use, including legislation that would provide resources for states and local communities to address addiction with prevention and treatment programs.
The full text of the letter is below:
The Honorable Debra Houry

Director, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road

Atlanta, GA 30329

 

Dear Dr. Houry,

 

We write to encourage the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to issue prescribing guidelines for opioids in the case of managing acute pain, including pain following an injury, such as a broken bone, or a medical procedure, such as a wisdom tooth extraction, and to include adolescents and children in these guidelines. We also request that CDC investigate the effects of opioid prescriptions for acute versus chronic pain on opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction.

 

We applaud the efforts of the CDC in updating opioid prescribing guidelines for chronic pain. It is widely known that at least part of the opioid epidemic can be attributed to an overabundance of opioid prescriptions written by providers, and substantial research exists linking the use of opioids for chronic pain and opioid addiction. As there are now more than 2 million Americans suffering from an opioid use disorder, it is critical for prescribers to thoughtfully and responsibly prescribe these powerful narcotics.

 

However, not all individuals with opioid use disorders have chronic pain. For many, their difficulties with opioid addiction began after receiving an opioid prescription for acute pain. For example, a study published in the Journal of the American Dental Association found that 64% of surveyed dentists preferred prescribing hydrocodone with acetaminophen after a third molar extraction—a procedure commonly completed on teenagers and young adults—for an average of 20 pills per prescription. These researchers recognized that a 20-pill prescription may be more than necessary, and that writing prescriptions for larger numbers of pills, when only a few pills will suffice, may cause patients to misuse the remaining pills.  One example of misuse is diverting or giving away pills to another person. Indeed, countless studies have shown that at least some teenagers divert these excess pills to their friends. Moreover, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) reports that adolescents who abuse opioids are more likely to receive these medications from a friend or family member.

 

Another recent study utilizing data from NIDA found that teenagers who received an opioid prescription by Grade 12 were 33% more likely to abuse opioids after high school. Perhaps most striking, these researchers found the risk for opioid abuse was even higher among teenagers who reported little to no previous use of illicit substances. For these teenagers, this opioid prescription may be their first introduction to addictive substances. That it is prescribed by a physician may create the notion that the substance is “safe,” leading to misuse of the substance.

 

Overprescribing of opioids for acute pain is therefore potentially problematic in two ways. First, individuals with acute pain, particularly those who have not had previous exposure to any illicit substances, may be at heightened risk to abuse or become addicted to these substances in the future. This trend may be particularly relevant for younger patients. Second, as the research has shown, these prescriptions contribute to the available supply of opioids and are frequently and inappropriately diverted to others. More research on opioid prescriptions for acute pain and its relation to illicit opioid use would further illuminate these potential paths to addiction.

 

Prevention of overprescribing or inappropriate prescribing of opioids is a key component to combating the opioid epidemic. By updating the prescribing guidelines for acute pain, including those prescribed to adolescents and children, we can minimize the initial exposure to opioid medications and further limit the number of opioid prescriptions, which can have positive downstream effects on combatting opioid abuse.  Furthermore, investigating the link between opioid prescriptions for acute pain and opioid abuse would better inform efforts to reduce opioid use disorders.

 

Thank you in advance for your attention and cooperation with our request. We look forward to hearing from you on this matter.

 

Sincerely,

 

Kirsten Gillibrand

United States Senator

 

 

Shelley Moore Capito

United States Senator

Posted in Uncategorized

Gedney Association Says City Corporation Counsel Urges Appeal Judge Lefkowitz Ruling that Council Must Vote on FASNY

Hits: 329

WPCNR LETTER TICKER. JANUARY 28, 2016:

The following correspondence with the Mayor of White Plains has been shared with WPCNR by the Gedney Association:

January 28, 2016

Honorable Mayor Thomas Roach
255 Main Street
White Plains, NY 10601

Dear Mayor Roach,

There are disturbing rumors coming out of City Hall that your Corporation Counsel is urging the Common Council to “appeal” Judge Lefkowitz’s order to vote on the FASNY application for a Special Permit and Site Plan.  The obvious question is: “Why?”  FASNY has asked for a decision.

Those opposing the FASNY plan also agree that the Common Council needs to vote on it.  In fact, last August in tabling the application you and your colleagues essentially said the same, indicating that the road closure was an integral component to it.  So what is triggering this very unusual idea to challenge a Judge’s order?  What is the compelling reason not to comply with the Judge’s order?  What is the City’s interest in appealing her order?

Mr. Mayor, I and others fear we are entering a very serious and dangerous period in this long FASNY process.  We know that powerful outside interests have attempted to influence the outcome of this decision for a long time. It has already taken almost five years.

Let’s move this issue out of the shadows and vote.  The residents and voters are entitled to have their Common Council complete the process as the Judge has so directed and vote.  Doing otherwise will not pass the smell test and raise very serious questions about the real motivations of those arguing for such a position and will permanently damage the reputation of the Mayor and Common Council.

Very truly yours,

John E. Sheehan, President
The Gedney Association

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

HILLARY CLINTON CAMPAIGNS IN WHITE PLAINS

Hits: 375

Hillaryimage1

Hillary Clinton leaving this morning’s fundraiser in White Plains. The news media was denied admittance to the event, and reporters and photographers were kept far back from Mrs. Clinton’s arrival/departure location at 1133 Westchester Avenue. Details to follow later today. Photo exclusively
for WPCNR by Peter Katz.

 

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2016. Special to WPCNR by Peter Katz. January 28, 2016:

Hillary Clinton emphasized the differences between herself and her chief rival for the Democrat Party’s Presidential nomination, Senator Bernie Sanders, during a fund raising event in White Plains on Thursday morning.

She said that his plan for free college for anyone who wants it is not realistic, and he doesn’t explain how it will be paid for. Mrs. Clinton also criticized his plan to scrap Obamacare and move everyone onto Medicare, suggesting that Sanders put forward the idea without thinking it through and understanding the financial implications of such a move.

She noted that she was very familiar with the complications involved in attempting to restructure healthcare in the U.S., having led an effort for healthcare reform while she was First Lady. Mrs. Clinton thanked those in attendance for their support, both monetary and philosophical.

She explained that her recent campaigning in Iowa has given her the opportunity for an even deeper understanding of the needs of the American people, especially the middle class which has lost ground while the extremely wealthy continue to expand their holdings.

The former First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State addressed an enthusiastic gathering of about 500 who had paid from $250 to $2,700 per ticket for breakfast and the chance to hear her speak, and perhaps shake her hand and pose with her for a photo.

The event was staged by the group Westchester for Hillary in an office building owned by the development company RPW Group at 1133 Westchester Avenue. The building’s atrium was transformed into a venue complete with dining tables and a stage.

Reporters and photographers were not allowed inside to cover Mrs. Clinton’s speech. However, one of the attendees initiated a live video feed of her speech using a cell phone application, allowing the few journalists who were aware of the feed to monitor what she was telling the gathering.  In addition, an elected official who was attending the event subsequently shared with the news media a photo he had taken inside.

The event was scheduled to take place from 8:30 am to 10:30 am. Mrs. Clinton’s motorcade of three vehicles arrived at about 8:50 am. Instead of being directed to the circular driveway in front of the main entrance, Mrs. Clinton was taken to a rear entrance, out of sight of the television cameras which were waiting in the front.  She stayed longer than expected, not leaving until shortly before 11 am.

Congresswoman Nita Lowey introduced Mrs. Clinton. Among the other Democratic officeholders who attended were County Board of Legislators Chairman Mike Kaplowitz, Assemblyman David Buchwald, New Rochelle Mayor Noam Branson,  White Plains Mayor Thomas Roach, and State Senator Andrea Stewart-Cousins.

 

Posted in Uncategorized

White Plains Announces Schedule of Public Meetings for Citizens to Give Their Ideas on How Transit Center Should be Adopted.

Hits: 324

WPCNR TRANSITCENTER TRANSFORMATION Times. From the Mayor’s Office. January 27, 2016:

 2015803 050
DO you live around or have strong feelings on how the area around the White Plains Train Station should be developed? Then you should attend the meetings noticed below on the City of White Plains website inviting public comment on how the Transit Center should change.
The city wrote:
Public Engagement Meetings

The City of White Plains is committed to working with residents, transit users, businesses, and community groups throughout the planning process of the Downtown White Plains Transit District Study.
Three public engagement meetings will be held where the public can learn more about the study and provide feedback:
Meeting
 Date
 Time
 Location
 Snow Date
Meeting #1

Thursday, February 11, 2016

6:30 pm – 8:30 pm

White Plains Public Library

Thursday, March 3, 2016

Meeting #2

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

6:30 pm – 8:30 pm

White Plains Public Library

Meeting #3

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

6:30 pm – 8:30 pm

TBD

Public Engagement Meetings #1 and #2 will be held at the White Plains Public Library, 100 Martine Avenue, 2nd Floor, White Plains, NY 10601. The library has an underground public parking garage and is also located near many public transportation options. The library is also fully accessible.

Public Engagement Meeting #3 location TBD.

This page will be updated periodically to provide electronic materials from the Public Engagement Meetings.

Posted in Uncategorized

Not All in Gedney Farms Oppose FASNY Project, Writer Says

Hits: 378

WPCNR LETTER TICKER. JANUARY  25, 2016:

To the Editor
As a White Plains resident of Gedney Farms, I have naturally been following your reporting on the French-American School and, more importantly, the potential for a White Plains city nature park, which will be a key feature of more than half of the land FASNY has purchased. I believe there are a few issues that deserve clarification.
I often read that the plan has been opposed by residents led by the Gedney Association, which is true but could inaccurately lead readers to believe that most Gedney Farms residents oppose the plan. In fact, there is a very small vocal minority that has been unwilling to reconsider its early opposition to the original proposal, even though the current FASNY plan addresses all of their early objections.
The current plan dramatically reduces the original traffic concerns, and in fact, will create far less traffic in and around Gedney Farms than 85 new homes on the site, which is the only realistic alternative to FASNY. Further, this small group of residents has been claiming that the school will lower the City’s tax base, which is misleading, and lower nearby property values, which is patently untrue. Any taxes levied on new homeowners will be spent to provide them with City services. There will be no net-gain for the City. Furthermore, it is likely that the influx of new public school students will necessitate City funding (and possible Citywide tax increases) for new school construction and additional teachers. The argument against FASNY because the school will not pay taxes is simply unfounded.  Quite the opposite, FASNY’s gift of a public nature park at no cost to city taxpayers is unprecedented.
With respect to property values, 85 new homes will create additional supply, which will naturally lower the value of surrounding property. In other cities, homes abutting parks, nature preserves or private schools tend to be valued higher. I cannot imagine why White Plains would be an exception. The school’s plan, including the nature park, will increase — not decrease — nearby property values.
Concerns about student safety are also unfounded. While one could point to some of the very earliest FASNY plans as warranting discussion about student safety, the current plan opens several car-free paths to students who wish to walk or bike to the High School from Gedney Farms and neighborhoods to the south and west. FASNY’s plan makes it far safer than walking on Ridgeway or Bryant — today’s only choices. The housing alternative cannot possibly be argued as safer: walking through a new housing development where 85 households will be funneling out in their cars at exactly the same time students will be sharing the road on foot.
My family and I live in Gedney Farms, and we stand with the majority of our neighbors — and the vast majority of residents across all of White Plains — strongly in favor of the FASNY plan. The benefits of an esteemed educational institution, particularly when coupled with the facilities and nature park it is offering at no cost to the City, is the clear best choice for White Plains. The Common Council’s duty is to vote for plans that are in the best interests of the majority of White Plains residents. Anything but a unanimous “yes” vote for FASNY would be unconscionable.
Respectfully yours,
David Kohl
21 Dupont Avenue
White Plains, NY 10605
+1 914-686-0406
Posted in Uncategorized

14 Inches and Slightly Higher Drifts. Roads in WP Conditions Unknown.

Hits: 331

 

 

 

 

2016124snowy 034

Snowy Morning: The Official WPCNR SNOWOMETER (a yardstick) calculates 13 to 14 inches of snow fell at WPCNR HQ.2016124snowy 033

2016124snowy 036

Sun has melted light snow covering on the roads in the WPCNR Falling Zone. There is no information on the city website on the conditions of White Plains roads and there has not been any updates on the city website throughout the storm event. And this reporter received no phone updates.The assumption is that the Department of Public Works under new Commissioner Richard Hope has carried on the tradition of keeping White Plains functioning within hours of a snowfall’s end.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized