UPDATE ON COVID VACCINES FOR UNDER-5’S FROM “YOUR LOCAL EPIDEMIOLOGIST” — NATIONALLY VACCINATED UNDER 5 VERY LOW. “ATROCIOUS” COVERAGE NATIONALLY. CONFUSION REIGNS. AVAILABILITY OF UNDER-5 VACCINES DIFFICULT.

MODERNA UNDER-5 VACCINE AVAILABLE AT WHITE PLAINS DEPT. OF HEALTH CLINIC FRIDAYS IF YOU CALL FOR AN APPOINTMENT.

By Dr. Katelyn Jetelina, Your Local Epidemiologist, December 20,2022. Reprinted with permission

Buried in the news of the triple-demic, an updated Omicron booster was authorized for kids under 5 years old. My weekly Q&A on Instagram has been flooded with questions from parents. Here’s a quick update.

Who is eligible for a fall booster?

This is very confusing, as it depends on what vaccine series (and how much of that series) they have received:

  • Moderna: Every child that had the primary series (2 shots) is eligible for the fall booster
  • Pfizer:
    • If your child completed primary series (3 shots), they are not eligible.
    • If your child did not complete the primary series (i.e., had 1 or 2 shots only), they are eligible for the fall booster.
    • EDITOR’S NOTE: Schedule a First Dose Pediatric Moderna Vaccine (Ages 6 Months to 5 years) AT THE WHITE PLAINS WESTCHESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 134 COURT STREET. CALL THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TO SCHEDULE AND FOR DETAILS ON ELIGIBILITY. https://health.westchestergov.com/157-covid-19-updates/2807-vaccine-information

I’m not sure why this was decided this way. Don’t shoot the messenger.

How is the primary vaccine doing?

Safety. The vaccines continue to be safe. We saw this during the clinical trials, but we continue to see it in the real world. The CDC released results of their active (V-Safe) and passive surveillance (VAERS).

  • The most frequent reactions: injection site pain, fatigue, and fever.
  • Four children received care at a hospital after vaccination: two were unrelated to vaccination, one was unwilling to provide further information, and one is under further review. None have died.
  • No cases of myocarditis were reported.

Effectiveness. The clinical trial data was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. However, we have yet to see any real world effectiveness data. (And I looked hard!) This is likely because uptake has been so low that it’s difficult to assess with certainty.

What is vaccine uptake for kids under 5?

Coverage for the primary series is just atrocious. Only 792,000 children under age 5 have one dose, which equates to 8.4% of this population. This varies widely across states—29% of kids in DC have received their first dose compared to 1.7% in Mississippi.

This is incredibly interesting to me given that, in a recent poll, 1 in 2 parents said they are worried their child will get seriously sick from COVID-19. I would be curious to see the below graph organized by age group.

We are not the only country experiencing slow uptake. Data from Nature show that about a dozen countries, including Canada and Israel, have approved vaccination for children from their first year of life. Yet in Canada, for example, only 8.4% of children aged 0-4 have been vaccinated.

What are you doing with your kids?

My girls (2 and 3 years old) had the primary Moderna series, so they are eligible for a fall booster. It’s not clear how much additional help it will provide in preventing hospitalization. But they will be getting the fall booster for two other reasons:

  1. Broaden protection. SARS-CoV-2 has changed a lot and the fall booster provides updated instructions for our kids’ antibody factories. In other words, it will tell their antibodies how better to recognize Omicron if they get infected.
  2. Short-term protection against infection. A recent study found co-infection of flu and COVID is more severe than just flu or COVID alone for our kiddos.
  3. Also, parents missing work due to respiratory illness is at an all time high right now. I’ll take all the help I can get.

Average number of parents who missed work due childcare problems. Source: Department of Labor

I’ve been struggling with timing the fall booster. It’s clear from adult data that delaying the booster is advantageous. My girls finished their primary series 5 months ago. But delaying it too much more won’t be helpful this winter. I talked to Dr. Ruth Link-Gelles about this last week and decided to get them boosted as soon as possible.

That is, if I can find one.

According to vaccines.gov, I have to travel more than 45 miles to get my 2 year old the updated booster, which is absolutely unacceptable. If we want to improve vaccine uptake, we have to make it easier.

Bottom line

The updated booster is here for our little ones. To me, an updated booster still makes sense, but finding one is another story.

As parents, it’s absolutely exhausting how many viruses are circulating right now. Hang in there—every epi curve comes down.

Posted in Uncategorized

White Plains Schools and Common Circles Fight the Tyranny of First Impressions

Bayete’ Ross Smith photographs State Senator Shelley Mayer for “We are White Plains: Bridging, Belonging and Building Community” a photographic exhibit featuring 36 White Plains Schools and prominent citizens in White Plains to help White Plains students and the community explore identity via a traveling museum. It will be showcased in the halls of White Plains High School in March.
JOE BOYKIN, White Plains High School personality posing for a series of photographs of him in different clothing and styles

WPCNR IMPRESSIONS TAKEAWAYS TRANSITIONS. By John F. Bailey, December 19, 2022:

My father once told me in discussing job intervews, “You never have a second chance to make a first impression.”

I learned that again Friday at a photo shoot involving 36 persons from the White Plains High School and Middle School, including Mayor Tom Roach Council President Justin Brasch and State Senator Shelley Meyer.

Staff administrators from the White Plains School District, members of the police and fire department, the mayor, the state senator, and other dignitaries, along with other well-known individuals working in the White Plains participated.

The  non-profit Common Cause conducted an all-day photography shoot at the high school Friday, capturing 36  school employees in a variety of clothing of their choice.

Each participant was photographed in a variety of outfits of their choosing as part of a planned traveling museum “pilot” program. The program is being used to demonstrate to those looking at 10 different pictures of the same person, instinctively make a snap judgment what the person is as to character, safety, respect, attraction.

The program is named:

“We are White Plains: Bridging, Belonging and Building Community.”

It is scheduled to be unveiled in the halls of White Plains High School March 2023.

Photographer Bayete’ Ross Smith composed the compositions in the all day session.

Beyete’ Ross Smith talks about how he got the idea for the identity demonstration. (Click white arrow > on left to start the interview)

He shot 10 portraits of each  of the 36 participants photographing them in ten distinctly different fashion presentations chosen by the subject who posed with  a blank expression in each outfit.

Sue Spiegel, left, and Marla Felton of Common Circles, creators of “We Are White Plains,” talk about plans for the exhibition. (Click white arrow > at the left to hear the interview)

The blank countenance you encounter  when looking at the  10 photographs of each person, you were not swayed by a smile, a scowl, or grimace or a laugh, forcing you as an individual to discover that seeing the same person in a different outfit, you make a different judgment.

Sue Spiegel and Marla Felton of the non-profit, Common Circles, Inc. are using the arts, conversation, interactives and storytelling to help students in the White Plains School District and the broader White Plains community explore identity.

Superintendent of Schools Dr. Joseph Ricca organized the program with Common Circles

The dynamic revelation was conceived by Mr. Ross Smith as part of his “Our Kind of People” series. “Our Kind of People” examines how perception about someone’s identity, value and character is affected by appearance such as clothing.

Joe Boyin observes why he wanted to pose for the exhibition.

The finished exhibition scheduled to appear at the High School in March consists of photos of each of the participants in 10 different outfits, such as this photo below. on Mr. Ross Smith’s website.

When I observed this Mr. Ross for the first time, I realized how right my father was about not getting a second chance to make a first impression.

This one person wearing 5 different outfits. I think the photo of one person with 5 different looks explains why we should not make judgments based on appearance.

Posted in Uncategorized

“MT. COVID.”CURRENT 2-DAY FAST INFECTION OF COVID COMBINED WITH 300 NEW INFECTIONS DAILY IN WESTCHESTER (2,000 A WEEK) COULD CREATE 12,063 CASES THIS CHRISTMAS WEEK. 10 COUNTIES AROUND NYC URGED TO WEAR MASKS BY CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL.

WESTCHESTER COMPLETES THIRD WEEK OF 2,000 NEW COVID CASES IN ROW. 300 A DAY GETTING INFECTED.

Mt. ETNA, SICILY 2019…all quiet but the black dried lava on right remains. (WPCNR PHOTO)

WPCNR COVID SURVEILLANCE From the New York State Covid Tracker. Observation & Analysis by John F. Bailey. December 18: UPDATED DEC. 20, 2022:

I see the covid statistics as a volcano , a Mt. Etna (pictured above IN 2019) on the island of Sicily. The daily rate of infections smoking at the top innocently against a blue sky. The blackened lava eruptions of past thousands of years in wide swaths down its sides

Meanwhile, inside the vast mystery in the base of the volcano containing the lava of unconfirmed untested, or positive tested persons (afraid to report to verify their positive) is building the potential for fast, fast fast infections over the next weeks.

That is what happened to Westchester 12 months ago, when “Mt. Covid”erupted.

The NY Covid Tracker reported Monday that Westchester County has 192 lab-validated new covid cases raising the Westchester total to 2,108 for the week December 11 through December 17.

Last week ended Saturday is the third consecutive week, the covid tracker reported Westchester with over 2,000 new cases, which would total 6,730 new covid cases since the Friday after Thanksgiving, on track to produce 7,000 to 8,000 new cases next week (the week before Christmas.

But the total could double that because of how quickly covid afflicted persons spread the disease to others: within 2 days. I am seeing now for the last 3 weeks sharp increases on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday the days when cases used to under 200 new infections before Thanksgiving.

One year ago in 2021, December 12 to 18, Westchester recorded 5,367 new cases of covid (when there were no vaccines available to protect the population).

This year with vaccines, Westchester has exceeded that total.

In the week after Christmas just 5,367 covid cases resulted in the spreading the disease to 12,063 people the week before Christmas. WPCNR estimates the 2,184 infections from last week (December 4-10) will combine with th 2,000 infections this week to infect 300 persons a day during the week before Christmas, or a conservative total of 4,200 people.

If the coronavirus now out there spreads as fast as it did the last two week period ended yesterday infecting people within 2 days, (because of the faster rate of transmission of diseases, reflected in higher cases on the first 5 days of the week the last 3 weeks), you might expect more than 4,200 infections next week.

Last year there were 12, 063 infections from December 18 to 24, but that was when Westchester was masking. If everyone masked this coming week at gatherings, parties, on traveling, and finished off their vaccinations the spread will be reigned in. If you do not mask and do not get fully vaccinated, we may see considerably more than the current 309 infections a day.

Do not forget the percentage of positive tests verified by labs out of Westchester County. It was 7% on Friday and holding at an 8.5% average through 6 days.

Let’s look at the placid NY Covid Tracker that unflinchingly puts out the results of positives of only lab-verified tests .

Last week in one of the most obscure statistics ever created Westchester had an average daily infection rate daily of 33 new cases daily (per 100,000 of population according to the NY Covid Tracker). What does this really mean?

If you multiply 33 by the population of Westchester per 100,000 of the 2022 population 1,004,457 which creates 10 blocks of 100,000 people- 10.04) you get infections of 331 (not 33) daily for 5 of 6 days in the county Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday) which is 2,317 a week with vaccines available, and masking available, personal socializing within citizens’ control, all doable by Westchester citizens, they just have to do it).

This means unless behavior and personal completion of vaccination full quotas of doses responsibilities are not brought up to date by you and me Mr. and Mrs and Ms. Westchester , do not improve we may get considerably more than 2,317 a week.

Here’s why: the week before Thansgiving (Nov 20-26) saw an increase in how many newly infected with covid persons spread it to other persons.

Each newly infected person of the 1,139 infected with covid (lab-test verified only, from November 20 to 26 to the week of November 26 through December 3 infected to 6 others after Thanksgiving holiday lifting new infections to 2,102. Divide 2,102 by 1,139 and you get a 1 infectee infecting 6 other persons.

That is what the pre-Thanksgiving infections did.

As I wrote previously, the 2, 317 infections a week the NY Covid Tracker reports Westchester averaging based on the rate of 33 daily per our 1,004,457 population (10.04 100,000 segments) we can expect those 2,317 infections a week to bring possibly 13,903 infections by the end of next week which totals ,more than last year’s 12,063 when we had no vaccines, just masks and personally being careful.

But, you Mr. and Mrs. and Ms. Westchester can prevent that. It is in your hands, and personal discipline.

The other 8 counties surrounding New York City as well as NYC as of Friday, Dec. 16, these New York counties are in the “orange” zone with “high” COVID levels where masks are currently recommended:

  • Westchester County
  • Rockland County
  • Orange County
  • Putnam County
  • Nassau County
  • Suffolk County
  • Bronx County
  • Kings County (Brooklyn)
  • Queens County
  • Richmond County (Staten Island)
Posted in Uncategorized

LONG COVID: An update and gauging risk

Your Local Epidemiologist

Long COVID: An update and gauging risk

Dr. Katelyn Jetelina

Earlier this year I wrote a four-post series on long Covid: burden; impact on specific health systems, like the heart; long Covid among kids; predictors of long Covid and treatment. Today’s newsletter is meant to be an update—I’m picking up where I left off, so I highly recommend reading those first, if you haven’t already.


The individual risk of death from a COVID-19 infection is now close to the flu thanks to vaccines, immunity, and treatment. However, death is not the only outcome of SARS-CoV-2. Long Covid—or the persistence of symptoms after an infection beyond three months—is still a threat to living a healthy and prosperous life.

Overall burden

A recent study pooled more then 54 long Covid studies (which included a total of 1.2 million people) and found that 6% of individuals who had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection experienced long Covid in 2020 and 2021. This is consistent with a massive study in Sweden (2020-2021) that found the proportion receiving a long Covid diagnosis was 1% among individuals not hospitalized for their COVID-19 infection, 6% among those hospitalized, and 32% among those treated in the ICU.

Today, the U.K. estimates that 3% of the general population has long Covid. In the U.S., the population-level burden of long Covid has been historically difficult to grasp. But in August 2022, the U.S. Census Bureau added four questions about long Covid to its Household Pulse Survey. What did they find?

  • 16 million working-age Americans (aged 18 to 65) have long Covid today. This equates to ~8% prevalence.
  • Of those, 2-4 million are out of work due to long Covid.
    • The annual cost of lost wages is ~$170-$230 billion a year.
  • The prevalence of severe long Covid is unequally distributed across race/ethnicity and age.

Economically, long Covid is a big deal to this country. The total economic cost is $3.7 trillion in the U.S., without accounting for future cases.

Changing risk

Just like the risk of death, the risk of long Covid appears to have changed over time.

In general, there are three things that are decreasing the risk of long Covid today:

  1. Vaccines. A number of studies show vaccines reduce the risk of long Covid. The problem is that these studies greatly vary in the estimated reduction: some say vaccines reduce long Covid by 85%, others say 15%. The “truth” is likely somewhere in-between.
  2. Paxlovid. One study found Paxlovid reduced the risk of long Covid by 25%.
  3. Omicron. A very strong study in the Lancet found the odds of long Covid after an Omicron infection were significantly lower compared to after a Delta infection.

All of these help, but are not bullet proof.

Of course, the more the virus mutates to become more contagious, the risk of infection (and thus long Covid) increases.

Death from long Covid

The National Center for Health Statistics released the first long Covid mortality report yesterday. The scientists started with over 1 million death certificates dated from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2022 that indicated COVID-19 as the underlying or contributing cause of death. Then they searched for clues that the patient had long Covid by looking for words like: “chronic COVID,” “long COVID,” “long-haul COVID,” or “post-COVID syndrome.” What did they find?

  • 3,544 deaths—or 0.3 percent of the total—had text on their death certificates about long Covid
  • Long Covid peaked in June 2021 (1.2%) and in April 2022 (3.8%)
  • Long Covid death rate was highest among adults aged 85+, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native people, and males.

A simple search of words like this has major limitations, so we cannot make causal claims. This is more of an exploratory analysis to see if “long Covid” appeared on death certificates. My hunch is that this is a huge underestimate of long Covid deaths, but it could be an overestimate. More work needs to be done.

Increased death from SARS-CoV-2 is not limited to acute illness

We are at the mercy of time to see the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection beyond symptoms, for example blood clots.

One rattling study in the Lancet found that people infected with SARS-CoV-2 had more than 3 times the risk of dying over the following year compared with those who remained uninfected. For COVID-19 cases aged 60 years or older, increased mortality persisted until the end of the first year after infection, and was related to increased risk for heart and/or respiratory causes of death.

An Australian report of excess death found something similar.

A report from Singapore also found an increase in excess mortality after infection (people without recent infections had no additional excess deaths), however it was not linked to cardiovascular events.

Implications

On a population level, it’s clear that the footprint of SARS-CoV-2 will extend for decades to come. But what this looks like is highly debated, and there are two camps of scientists:

  • One camp thinks long Covid will be a mass debilitating event that will define the economies of countries for decades
  • The second believes long Covid is real, incredibly debilitating for the people who have it, but, given the change in risk, will not be such a big event that our future economies or health systems will fail.

Time will tell.

On an individual level, assessing risk of long Covid is extremely difficult. How much should long Covid impact my daily decisions? To me, it’s easiest to understand a new threat by comparing it to familiar threats, like driving. I did this using MicroMorts a few months ago, comparing the risk of dying from COVID-19 to, for example, skydiving.

Here is what I found (keep in mind these are super rough estimates):

  • Driving: The annual risk of getting into a car accident is 1 in 30 per year for the average driver. Of those accidents, 43% are likely to be injured. And, of those injured, 10% are permanently impaired. So, the annual risk of permanent impairment from driving is 1 in 700.
  • Long Covid: The risk of getting an Omicron infection (asymptomatic and symptomatic) per year is ~1 in 2 (before Omicron it was ~1 in 4). If we take into account 3% of infections lead to long Covid and, of those, ~18% will have disease so severe that they are unable to work. So, the annual risk of severe long Covid (unable to work) is 1 in 370.
  • Other annual risk comparisons:
    • Severely injured during a house fire: 1 in 20,000
    • Needing reconstructive surgery after a dog bite: 1 in 400

So, the risk of debilitating long Covid is double the risk of permanent impairment from driving. Risk of debilitating long Covid is much higher than getting injured during a house fire and about the same as getting a serious dog bite.

Of course, individuals can do a lot of things to reduce risk for all of the above: Wear seatbelts. Drive less. Make sure your fire alarms work. Don’t approach growling dogs. But, we also make conscious (or non-conscious) decisions to increase risk: texting while driving; unplugging the annoying beeping fire alarm. It’s an every day balancing act. But, just like speeding tickets, required fire exit signs, and leash laws, there are policy level initiatives that could help with long Covid, too.

Bottom line

Long Covid is an incredibly debilitating disease and millions are suffering. While risk is changing, we don’t know what the future will hold.

This leaves us with a difficult balancing act. I find myself not willing to take risks in some instances, and more willing in other instances—as with many things I do in my daily life, like driving. A person next to me will be very different. I think it will be years until this calculated decision-making becomes easier.

Editor’s Note: On Monday December 12, the New York State Covid Tracker reported 346 cases of new covid were reported (Lab Test verified) bringing the first two days of this week total to 645 new cases, continuing a third week of highly increased cases immediately after the weekend, putting the county on track for a third week of over 2,000 new cases.

Posted in Uncategorized