94 Guns Turned In in 1st White Plains Gun Buy Back. “A Success” Mayor, Commissioner and NY Attorney General Office Says.

2014322guns 027

Commissioner of Public Safety David Chong (center) with Mayor Thomas Roach to his left before the display of 54 handguns and 40 rifles, shotguns and military rifles turned in by the public Saturday morning at the first ever White Plains Gun Buy Back. The arsenal of 54 “highly concealable” hand guns was impressive below.

2014322guns 007

WPCNR POLICE GAZETTE. By John F. Bailey. March 23, 2014:

Ninety four guns were turned in by the public at large in four hours Saturday morning  ( no questions asked) at the first Gun Buy Back held in White Plains.  The citizens were paid a total $5,075 for the guns from state (crime) forfeiture funds.

It was the first buy back event ever in the city. It was organized by the City of White Plains in cooperation with the New York State Attorney General’s Office.

2014322guns 010

Assistant Attorney General Gary Brown, (above) in charge of the Attorney General’s Westchester Office said 54 handguns all in working, firing condition, were purchased back and 40 rifles, including shotguns and military weapons were turned in.

Mr. Brown said the event was a success. He said the next Gun Buy Back would be held in Poughkeepsie next Saturday March 29 at the Poughkeepsie public safety building at 505 Main Street. Brown told WPCNR the majority of persons turning in guns were over 40 years old. Many, he said, had had the guns in their possession for years and were pleased to get them out of their possession.

Mayor Thomas Roach of White Plains in a news conference said his office worked with the Attorney General Office to set up this morning’s gun buy back, but had no idea what to expect. “When I  arrived about 9:30, there were 40 people sitting down waiting to turn in guns.”

By 10: 30, 80 guns had been turned in for cash payments in the form of debit cards. The guns were turned in and no names were recorded.

White Plains Commissioner of Public Safety David Chong called the White Plains Gun Buy Back a “success,” and hoped, working with agents and the attorney generals office, that another White Plains Buy Back could be arranged.

2014322guns 019

Commissioner Chong  (left) pointed out the vast array of pistols to Mayor Roach(center),  what he called “easily concealable handguns” as now being weapons that could not be stolen out of persons homes and possibly used in a crime.  Assistant Attorney General Gary Brown stands at the far right.

2014322guns 009

Chong singled out a very realistic looking assault weapon replica that fired multiple rounds of BBs, which he said “sadly is available to the public.” He said such a gun ( a working replica of an assualt rifle) could lead to an unfortunate incident and regretted such a working replica was available for sale to the general public, and did not have to be licensed.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

FASNY: “Proceeding in advancing all of our applications and plans…lawsuit will not delay City’s review”

WPCNR SOUTH END TIMES. Statement from the French American School of New York. March 21, 2014:

The French American School of New York issued this statement, unsolicited by WPCNR, in observation of the filing of a lawsuit by the Gedney Association asking the New York Supreme Court to require the city to reexamine issues the Gedney Association charges in its suit that were not thorougly vetted before the Common Council voted a favorable Environmental Impact Statement on the school plans to build a campus on the former Ridgeway Country Club.

The Statement:

The study and scope of the environmental review of our school’s planned campus on the defunct Ridgeway Country Club property was the most thorough ever conducted by the City of White Plains. This multi-year, multi-million dollar review constitutes thousands of pages and encompasses virtually every conceivable aspect of the plan and its potential impacts. The Findings Statement alone is 129 single-spaced pages, involved more than two years of public review and environmental analysis and was adopted by a 6-1 vote.

The plan approved under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA):  significantly reduces traffic overall; shifts school traffic to a main arterial roadway (North Street); requires mandatory busing for eligible students; limits the total number of students; approves 75-plus acres for a permanent publicly accessible conservancy with pedestrian and open space linkages; extensively incorporates green technology and building practices; and incorporates a myriad of other positive features and designs minimizing the impact of the school.

While we are disturbed to see the personal attacks against individual Common Council members that are contained in the lawsuit, we are confident in the process that has been followed in the review of the plan. We are proceeding in advancing all of our applications and plans. The lawsuit will not delay the City’s review of the Site Plan or Special Permit. Few if any environmental reviews of this kind have ever been overturned by the courts.

As we respond to the lawsuit, we will continue to reach out and work with the many supporters of the school both in the Gedney neighborhood and across the city, and we look forward to joining the many high-quality educational entities that are privileged to call White Plains home.

Posted in Uncategorized

WHITE PLAINS WEEK SCOOPS AGAIN!

TONIGHT 7:30 PM COUNTY WIDE ON FIOS CHANNEL 45

WHITE PLAINS WIDE ON CABLEVISION 76

AND INSTANTLY ON THE INTERNET

www.whiteplainsweek.com

NOW

THE NEIGHBORHOOD NEWSIES:

2014131 001PETER KATZ, JOHN BAILEY, JIM BENEROFE

ON

THE NEW CREDIBILITY OF AUSTRALIA’S RADAR

THE WINBROOK LABOR DISPUTE 

GEDNEY ASSOCIATION SUES CITY ON THE FASNY ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING

THE STATE PLOT TO KILL TESLA- WHITE PLAINS RALLIES TO TESLA’S SIDE IN THE ELECTRIC CAR WAR

SUSTAINABLE PLAYLAND DOES NOT LOOK TOO SUSTAINABLE AFTER  LEGISLATORS TOUR PLAYLAND–THERE IS NO MONEY STORY YET

THE DEMOCRATIC DISTRICT LEADERS ARE IN A HISSY FIT OVER HOW BOYKIN REPLACEMENT WAS SELECTED.

BRING YOUR UNLOADED GUNS TO TOWN AND TURN THEM IN NO QUESTIONS ASKED AT

THE FIRE HEADQUARTERS SATURDAY MORNING! AND GET CASH!

Posted in Uncategorized

Hold On, Mr. Cuomo! What Ever Happened to “Open NY?” Local Leaders Protest Auto Dealers’ TESLA-KILLER Bill. TESLA to Expand Chargers Cross State

AssemblymanBuchwaldTesla1

The Buchwald-Tesla News Conference at Tesla Showroom in
The Westchester Friday morning.

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. From the Office of District 33 Assemblyman David Buchwald. March 21, 2014:

Assemblyman David Buchwald (D-White Plains) announced at a press conference on Friday with Tesla, elected officials, business leaders and environmental advocates their strong opposition to Bill A.7844-A.

In addition, Assemblyman Buchwald and Tesla announced an additional measure to encourage the use of electric vehicles in New York State. As Tesla expands its Supercharger network across the State of New York to enable free long distance travel for Model S customers, it is building in additional electrical capacity and reserving extra real estate to co-locate non-Tesla charging points at Supercharger locations.

The proposed legislation would end the dire­ct sale of Tesla’s clean energy cars in New York State, and as a result, stifle environmental innovation, limit consumer choice, and impact jobs.

The bill mandates that vehicles in New York be sold exclusively through dealerships, outlawing automobile sales directly to the public.

Tesla is the only car manufacturer in New York that sells directly to consumers through its retail stores, just as Apple sells its products directly through its Apple Stores.

This announcement of growing opposition to the bill comes on the heels of New Jersey passing a rule last week to end Tesla’s direct sales of cars to consumers. The New York bill passed the Assembly Codes Committee on Wednesday, but still must be voted on by the full State Assembly before it becomes law.

Tesla announced that it welcomes companies interested in installing EV-compatible charge points for non-Tesla vehicles to inquire about permitting and construction at Supercharger locations in New York State. Providing electric charging capabilities along New York’s highways will help serve the needs of New York’s drivers, and encourage clean-energy innovation by automakers.

Tesla intends to install more than five Supercharger stations in the State, with two already having been installed at the JFK Airport and in Syosset, Long Island. According to Tesla, the company currently uses eight New York suppliers in the development and production of its vehicles amounting to over $9.5 million in purchase orders for New York goods and services. Each of Tesla’s service and sales centers add between $7-10 million in direct economic activity.

Assemblyman Buchwald was joined by Tesla Vice President of Regulatory Affairs and Associate General Counsel James Chen, White Plains Mayor Tom Roach and Mount Kisco Mayor Michael Cindrich who both have Tesla facilities in their municipalities, NY League of Conservation Voters Westchester Chapter Chair Nanette Bourne, Natural Resources Defense Council Director of Vehicles and Fuels Luke Tonachel, Environmental Entrepreneurs NY Metro Chapter Co-Director Chris Arndt, Lower Hudson Sierra Club Representative Ed Berry, Bedford 2020 Senior Vice President Olivia Farr, EcoNeighbors Co-Founder Marie McCann, Sustainable North Castle Co-Chair Eileen Joy, Westchester County Legislator Peter Harckham (D-North Salem), Members of the White Plains Common Council – John Kirkpatrick, Milagros Lecuona, John M. Martin and Beth Smayda, and other environmental and business advocates from across Westchester County and New York State.

“I have 3 Tesla facilities in my Assembly District alone, supporting 35 jobs,” said Assemblyman Buchwald. “This bill presents an immediate threat to these men and women who are contributing to the economic growth of Westchester County and the environmental innovation of New York State. Having worked in economics, I can tell you that mandating our cars be sold exclusively through dealerships is not consistent with having a competitive marketplace. We need to be encouraging – not discouraging – innovative ideas to improve our economy and environment. After what occurred in New Jersey, there should be no doubt that passage of this bill would shut down Tesla’s sales ability in New York, just as it is making strides towards giving Americans an alternative to gasoline-based transportation.”

Westchester Legislator Ken Jenkins (D-Yonkers) joined the growing opposition to new legislation moving through the New York State Assembly that would ban direct sales of Tesla electric cars in the state.

“The fight against Tesla is also a fight against free enterprise, open economic markets and environmental sustainability,” said Jenkins. “Tesla employs thirty-five people right here in Westchester, and this is just the start of something bigger as more people go green when shopping for a new car. Protecting self-interests against new discoveries and the wave of the future goes against the strong values that have made our nation a great, transformative force. I stand with Assemblyman Buchwald in keeping the New York market open to Tesla.”

 

“The bill before the New York State Legislature would hurt consumer choice for New Yorkers, eliminate jobs in the state, and discourage innovation in order to benefit a special interest trying to protect its monopoly,” said James Chen, Tesla’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs and Associate General Counsel. “Each of Tesla’s locations in New York adds $7-10 million in direct economic activity to the State. We hope we can continue to invest in New York and help make it a leader in sustainable transportation. ”

“I applaud Assemblyman Buchwald’s efforts to stop this state legislation, which would  compromise the ability of companies such as Tesla to operate in New York State,” said White Plains Mayor Tom Roach. “White Plains is working hard to expand its network of electric vehicle charging stations. Our goals are to make it easy and convenient for those with electric vehicles to come to White Plains and at the same time to encourage others to think about moving to an electric vehicle because they see that they can readily access charging stations. The presence of Tesla in White Plains supports those goals. That is why I am supportive of Assemblyman Buchwald’s efforts and opposed to this legislation.”

“Tesla recently opened a service center and showroom in the Village of Mount Kisco to meet the demands of their ever-growing client base,” said Mount Kisco Mayor J. Michael Cindrich. “Tesla has realized unprecedented success in the development of cutting edge technology that protects our environment. Government should not interfere with free trade, let the consumer decide how an automobile is purchased.  I stand in support of Assemblyman Buchwald’s initiative and invite future New Jersey Tesla owners to visit Mount Kisco’s Tesla facility.”

“New York should be doing everything it can to remove barriers to clean-energy vehicles. Unfortunately, the proposed law would make it harder for New Yorkers to buy electric vehicles by limiting choice,” said Marcia Bystryn, President of the New York League of Conservation Voters.  “This bill is wrong for the environment and wrong for consumers, and we strongly encourage our state leaders not to support it.”

“New Yorkers could really benefit from opening up the marketplace to auto sellers that use a different model, a model that protects consumers but allows direct sales,“ said NYPIRG Legislative Counsel Russ Haven. “Many New Yorkers love their local dealers and they can continue to shop that way.  But for others, including those with a Tesla in mind, it’s time to stop defending the status quo auto marketplace in New York.”

“Sierra Club stands with Assemblyman David Buchwald in opposing A 7488 which would effectively close down Tesla business operations in New York State, said Lower Hudson Sierra Club Representative Ed Berry. “Consumers would not only be prevented from purchasing electric vehicles but a new and innovative way of doing business would be stopped. This direct relationship between manufacturer and consumer can help drive future innovation and environmental progress. As a society we should be looking forward not backward. This bill is a step backwards.”

“Electric vehicles reduce harmful air pollution, cut our dependence on oil, and save drivers big money at the pump,” said Natural Resources Defense Council Director of Vehicles and Fuels Luke Tonachel. “With benefits like these, New York should be looking for ways to get more electric vehicles on the road, not throwing up detours.”

“I find it difficult to understand why this bill is even being debated,” said Assemblywoman Amy Paulin (D-Scarsdale). “Here we have a clean-energy car that can function effectively without polluting the environment. I think we should be supporting this and other ventures like it rather than fighting against it. And that doesn’t even take into account the jobs in White Plains that would be lost as a result of this bill.”

“Environmental Entrepreneurs is opposed to Bill A.7844-A,” said Environmental Entrepreneurs NY Metro Chapter Co-Director Chris Arndt. “We do not believe that Tesla, or any other company with new innovative technology, electric or otherwise, should be artificially shut out of the market and/or forced through a distribution model that may make sense for combustion engines, but not for other new approaches to automotive transport, particularly when the new approaches offer a pathway away from fossil fuel dependence and toward a clean sustainable economy.”

“EcoNeighbors, a White Plains environmental group, supports the efforts of State Assemblyman Buchwald, Tesla, and other local environmental groups to widen availability and practicality of electric cars in New York state,” said Eco-Neighbors Co-Founder Marie McCann.  “In the interests of our children and grandchildren, we must move as rapidly as possible toward cleaner energy in every sphere of human life, including transportation. New York State should not follow New Jersey’s policy of impeding Tesla sales, but should instead make it easier for Tesla to bring more electric cars to New York residents.”

“Tesla is a model company in that it is leading the charge to introduce a 21st century response to the need to reduce fossil fuels, said Bedford 2020 Co-President Ellen Rouse Conrad. “Their innovative approach, with both the cars they are producing and the solar-based charging stations they are supporting, is a win-win. One day our grandchildren will thank us and Assemblyman Buchwald for this effort to allow Tesla the freedom to solve a serious problem for our nation.”

“Sustainable North Castle supports Tesla’s focus on reducing vehicle emissions and oil dependency through their advances in green technology, and thus opposes the proposed bill that would ban direct sales of Tesla cars in New York State,” said Sustainable North Castle Co-Chair Eileen Joy.

“As Director of the Joule Assets Energy Reduction Assets investment fund–we invest in energy reduction projects and where markets make sense we invest and build jobs,” said Mike Gordon, a businessman from Lewisboro. “When incumbent industries seek to block the energy reduction economy, we can’t invest. That means lost jobs, foregone economic benefit and lost tax revenues. This bill, in my view, would not be wise.”

 

Posted in Uncategorized