Hits: 233

Hits: 525

Washington, DC — Ahead of the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee’s hearing on “Strengthening Airlines Operations and Consumer Protections,” John Samuelsen, International President of the Transport Workers Union (TWU) issued this statement:

“As the Senate Commerce Committee today examines the series of events that led to the worst operational meltdown in the history of Southwest Airlines, the Transport Workers Union of America encourages lawmakers to focus their attention on what we know to be the cause of this catastrophe – corporate neglect and an undying lust for profits by Southwest Airlines executives.

“While the Southwest meltdown was initially triggered by a severe weather event and further sustained by outdated, overwhelmed technology, Southwest’s leadership must accept blame and take full responsibility for a national crisis that left tens of thousands of passengers stranded for days on end, jeopardized the health and safety of thousands of employees, and caused an untold number of passengers tremendous mental anguish and financial distress.

“Southwest is the largest commercial air carrier in the United States, but it continues to rely on antiquated phone systems, eccentric computer programs, and IT processing capabilities that date back to the 1990s.

Instead of taking steps to upgrade these systems, executives chose to spend $5.6 billion on corporate buybacks in the three years leading up to this crisis.

All of this, in spite of the fact that TWU-represented Southwest Airlines workers, including flight attendants at TWU Local 556, fleet service workers at TWU Local 555, and flight dispatchers and meteorologists at TWU Local 550, have been sounding the alarm for years about the impacts of running a world-class airline on outdated, insufficient technology.

“What’s more, the vast majority of work groups at Southwest, who for years have made this carrier profitable and sustained it during the devastating COVID-19 pandemic, are still without secured, fair contracts.

“Southwest Airlines wants its passengers and employees to feel the LUV, but LUV flew out the window at Southwest the day Gary Kelly arrived, and the moment corporate executives chose profits over people.”

Hits: 732

WPCNR LABOR RAMPARTS Special to WPCNR. February 8, 2023:

The Service Employees International Union 32BJ 50 workers who lost their jobs a week ago  when  Pepsico hired a non-union security firm that told the SEIUBJ  workers they would not be rehired, are back on the job.

SEIU has begun negotiations with the new security firm and the employees are guaranteed at least 90 days further employment.

The change of heart came after SEIU filed a lawsuit accusing the new security form of violation of National Labor Relations Board practices.

Pepico issued this statement to  SEIU yesterday announcing that the new security firm had agreed to enter negotiations:

“AGB has informed us that they have communicated to SEIU that they recognize them as the representative of security workers at PepsiCo’s Purchase and Valhalla facilities and have asked the union to engage in good faith bargaining with them. We are hopeful that the two parties will soon reach a resolution.”

SEIU acknowledged the announcement:

“We are happy to hear AGB has decided to recognize 32BJ SEIU as the bargaining representative of the security guards at the Purchase and Valhalla facilities and look forward to bargaining with them in good faith. These workers deserve a contract that maintains workers’ employer-paid comprehensive healthcare, quality wages, other benefits, and which upholds area industry standards.” – 32BJ SEIU Executive Vice President and Director of the Hudson Valley District Shirley Aldebol

A spokesperson for SEIU today told WPCNR that the union was hopeful of securing a satisfactory contract with AGB before the 90 days employment guaranteed the workers by NLRB law expires. Paid healthcare benefits which the union workers now enjoy is a vital issue. The benefits remain in effect while negotiations are underway.

The SEIU spokesman the National Labor Relations Board that had initiated an inquiry into the violation of standard labor laws, (advance notice of terminating employees, and the opportunity to negotiate a new contract) had not moved ahead to his knowledge at the present time.

The union had planned a rally for Thursday to protest the AGB policy but has called the rally off with the announcement of AGB willingness to negotiate a new contract acceptable to the SEIU workers.

Hits: 222

Your Local Epidemiologist

By Dr. Katelyn Jetelina and 

Dr. Caitlin Rivers

Feb 7

The communication about ending the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) has been atrocious.

We’re confused. Everyone’s confused.

Dr. Rivers and I have been asking a lot of questions and getting some answers. Here is our understanding of the situation right now and what it means for you.

Really complex

There isn’t one national emergency declaration surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. There are five. Each has a different purpose for a different part of our government. The five emergency “buckets” are:

1. FDA
2. Stafford Act (i.e., FEMA)
3. Public Health Emergency
4. National Emergency
5. PREP Act

Together, these are responsible for hundreds (thousands?) of flexibilities that we saw throughout the pandemic. For example, the emergency use authorization for vaccines occurred under bucket #1. Extending Medicaid to more people happened under bucket #3. (This recently changed; see more below).

These different mechanisms created a complicated system that needs to be untangled without collapsing all at once.

To help prevent this, the five buckets of emergencies are ending at different times. Buckets #3 and #4 are ending in May 2023.

All the others are yet to be determined. (Apparently, #5 is being discussed among lawyers right now, for example).

Tools

Throughout the pandemic we’ve been told that “we have the tools.” The May inflection point means different things for different tools:

Antigen tests

Supply is going be impacted, but not necessarily because of the PHE. It’s dependent on Congressional budget. The tests are already commercialized. The U.S. bought a stockpile of antigen tests for the USPS program this past winter and still has a stockpile for the coming months. It’s not clear when this supply will run out.

The industry (i.e. test makers) are unwilling to produce a surplus of tests because demand is unknown. Without a guaranteed purchase (like from the government) or knowledge that more waves are coming to drive demand, they are hesitant to manufacture more. It’s not clear whether antigen tests, and which ones, will be available on retail shelves after the emergency like they are now.

In addition, the PHE requires health insurers to reimburse for up to eight antigen tests, per person, per month. After May, insurers will be able to choose whether to reimburse for those tests or not. We don’t have word yet, either way.

What it means for you: Don’t stock up on antigen tests just yet, as the tests do expire. But pick up some closer to the May deadline.

Vaccines

The FDA emergency (#1 above) is not ending. This means COVID-19 vaccines will still be available. BUT available is different from accessible.

Vaccines will be covered by the government until the stockpile (vaccines which the U.S. government bought from pharma) dries up. After the stockpile dries up or we get a Fall 2023 new formula booster, the vaccine will be covered by private insurance (through employment) or public insurance (Medicaid, Medicare, etc.) for the 92% of Americans who have health coverage. Most vaccines are free, with no co-pay required, thanks to the Affordable Care Act. What happens to the 8% who are uninsured? It’s not clear. We’re told there’s a plan and that they won’t be left behind. TBD.

What it means for you: Get your updated bivalent booster soon if you haven’t already. For those of you wondering if you should get a second bivalent, we may get more clarity in mid-February during the scheduled ACIP meeting.

Paxlovid

This supply is safest right now because it has the largest stockpile. In other words, the U.S. bought a ton of Paxlovid from Pfizer, and individuals shouldn’t have to pay for Paxlovid for a while. (Maybe second half of 2023, or 2024?) Once that stockpile is gone, it will be privatized. The price will be determined by Pfizer, and the price that individuals pay at the pharmacy will depend on health insurance.

What it means for you: Do not worry about Paxlovid supply for now. But this may be a problem in 2024.

Monoclonal antibodies/Evushield

These don’t work against the newest subvariants, and pharma doesn’t want to make more because the market keeps evaporating (because the virus keeps changing). For people for whom Paxlovid doesn’t work or the vaccine doesn’t confer protection (e.g., organ transplant patients), it’s not clear what protections there will be.

What it means for you: The most vulnerable will be less protected than before. Keep this is mind as you decide what precautions to take.

National surveillance

This will continue to some extent:

• Genomic surveillance: It’s our understanding the wastewater program will remain for now.
• Test positivity rates: Will likely go away because CDC can’t compel labs to report.
• Hospitalizations: CDC will still get data, but the frequency will likely slow down. (Weekly? Monthly?)
• Vaccine uptake: Will likely remain, as CDC is working with states to continue monitoring.
• Pharmacy testing: May go away. This turned out to be CDC’s fastest way to evaluate vaccine effectiveness. So we may be going back to a delayed system to know how well our vaccines are working, which is beyond disappointing.

What is means for you: We will have “skeleton monitoring” of COVID-19. Knowing if and when we are in a new wave to inform our behaviors, for example, will get more and more challenging.

Healthcare coverage

One of the most impactful tools during the emergency was Medicaid’s continuous coverage. During pre-pandemic times, states regularly checked whether people enrolled in Medicaid were still eligible. These “checks” were removed during the pandemic. When these “checks” resume on April 1, between 5.3 and 14.2 million adults and children will lose Medicaid coverage.

(Technically, this was under bucket #3, but the Omnibus bill passed in December uncoupled Medicaid from the PHE. So this doesn’t have to do with the PHE ending, but it’s still a big change we are going to see starting April 1.)

What this means for you: If you have Medicaid, your coverage may change soon. This is particularly dependent on your state.

National vs. state. vs. local

So far we’ve discussed national implications. Of course, things gets even more complicated because each state has its own authorities and emergency mechanisms. Everything will look different depending on your state, too.

States are responsible for what the transition from Medicaid continuous coverage back to “checks” look like, for example. Some states will follow up with people to let them know they are missing information so they don’t get dropped; some states will update mailing addresses proactively so people don’t lose coverage; some states will do nothing.

Wastewater surveillance is additionally dependent on the state or locality budget, for example. In California, the state budget for COVID-19 funding will be axed by ~90%. This means wastewater monitoring in California may reduced, regardless of a CDC grant. But in places like NY, wastewater is more protected by the state.

The ultimate problem

One way to think of the pandemic emergency arc is to compare it to a patient’s. For example, a patient goes through multiple stages of care after a traumatic car accident. The U.S. has gone through similar stages.

The concern that many people rightfully have is what happens once the U.S. “leaves the hospital.”

It’s a mess out there—fragmented care, underfunded public health, burnt out hospital workers, understaffed hospitals, disparities, pharma making a ton of money, expensive childcare, limited sick leave, etc. “Leaving the hospital” will mean drastically different things to different people:

• Some will do just fine, particularly those who are healthy and wealthy.
• Some people will do okay, like those over 65 who keep up to date with their vaccines.
• Some people will be left behind or get really sick, like with long COVID.

Bottom line

There are still a lot of unanswered questions, and it seems like an evolving situation. This needs to be a national conversation. Participate and push. (This NYT Op-Ed was a great start.) We, as a society, need to ensure we transition NOT to a 2019 world but to a new and better 2023 world.

Love, the Katelyn/Caitlin epidemiologists

---

Caitlin Rivers, PhD, MPH, is an assistant professor and epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. She has her own newsletter called Force of Infection:

Subscribe to Force of Infections Here

“Your Local Epidemiologist (YLE)” is written by Dr. Katelyn Jetelina, MPH PhD—an epidemiologist, data scientist, wife, and mom of two little girls. During the day she works at a nonpartisan health policy think tank and is a senior scientific consultant to a number of organizations, including the CDC. At night she writes this newsletter. Her main goal is to “translate” the ever-evolving public health science so that people will be well equipped to make evidence-based decisions. This newsletter is free thanks to the generous support of fellow YLE community members. To support this effort, subscribe below:.’

YOUR LOCAL EPIDEMIOLOGIST is reprinted by White Plains CitizeNetReporter with permission.

Hits: 307

WESTCHESTER  62  NEW COVID CASES Sunday  –LOWEST DAILY  IN 1 YEAR.

LAST WEEK NEW COVID SUFFERERS: 1,010.  5^TH LOW WEEK  IN ROW.

PREVIOUS DAY LOW: 60 NEW CASES ON FEB 28, 2022

WESTCHESTER AVERAGE DAILY CASES MYSTERY: MORE CASES OUT THERE THAN TESTS SHOW

WPCNR CORONAVIRUS SURVEILLANCE. Data from NY State Covid Tracker. Observation & Analysis by John F. Bailey. February 6, 2023 UPDATED WITH TODAY’S HOSP ADMISSIONS:

The last day Westchester recorded as low as 62 cases of new positive coronavirus cases was February 28, 2022.

Back then Westchester had been staggering from the County higest cases of covid in January 2022 when cases were still growing at 1,800 cases a week the first  two weeks of February, then as the covid vaccine inoculations started to have impact on infection rates we had sharp drops to 886 infections the third week in February and 492 the final week in February.

The low of 1,010  recorded through Saturday February 4 was the fifth consecutive week Westchester residents had managed to lower infections.  The first week of February 2022 last year Westchester suffered 1,883 new persons. Now after five weeks of reductions the county is doing much bette—56% below where we were last year.

Currently Westchester is seeing 6.4 new cases per 100,000 of population. This means since Westchester has 1,004,000 people,  it has 10.04 times 6.4 new cases  64 daily new cases of covid a day in the county, which works out to 450 a week, or 1,800 a month. So why are we seeing such low lab-verified cases, yet more hospitals  treating more patients for covid larger hospitals having as highas 50% covid patients.

White Plains Hospital Center Friday  reported 24 admissions with 18 being treated for covid (75% of admissions.) The last time I checked  the numbers on White Plains Hospital  on January 17 they were running 53% of admissions being treated for covid.

On January 17, 2023   this was the performance on admissions for 9 Westchester Hospitals  The White Plains Hospital has seen the percentage of covid patients go up flirting with 75% of admissions for covid.

The week of cold temperatures  continued reduction of covid infections.

The daily projected cases in Westchester (6.4 per Westchester 1,004,000 population)  do not match the average daily lab-verified cases.

The daily average infections should be generating 1,800 infections a month, but in January Westchester saw  7,131 cases. If Westchester continues to generate less than 1,000 cases the rest of February we would hit less than 4,000 cases for the month.

Of course, there may be a lag between daily cases reported by hospital and health authorities, but if there is a lag this means new cases should be even more than Westchester average of 6.4 per 100,000.

The daily average of lab-verified cases gives me the conclusion that a lot of citizens are not confirming if they tested positive for covid with a home test, and refuse to confirm the positive with a lab-test.

Could it be that they do not want to quarantine, want to continue to go to work and covid makes them sicker and by the time they are really sick from covid, they go to the hospital. Could this be a reason why daily average new cases do not add up to the positives expected if you go by the daily average  lab-confirmed cases?

We need the authorities and health officials to be more analytical and transparent on why  the continued hospitalizations  25% to 75% of hospital admissions (not including emergency treat-and-release admission) continues. It, in my opinion is a failure of testing policy on the part of state and local heal departments, that accounts for the continued official word that covid is behind us in the rear view mirror.

Is it coming from children in the schools? (Another failure of transparency)

Is it coming from careless adults trying to covid-it-out and not being able to do so until they panic and go to the hospital?

Is this hidden “hot positive population” a figment of my imagination, be they the unvaccinated, or whatever? Health officials choose to ignore these hospitalization rates at their peril. It’s not total beds a hospital has — it is how many personnel they have to administer ever growing covid cases now, they keep on coming.

If White Plains Hospital continues to get 18 new covid patients a day that is 140 a week.

If Suffolk County Stony Brook Hospital finds 21 patients out of 41 new admissions (50%) as they did Friday February 3, that is 140 a week.

If Northwell Hospital; in Nassau County finds 38 covid patients in 78 admissions Friday that is 266 a week.

If Yonkers Riverside gets 15 of 17 admissions a day a percentage 90% covid positives. That is 75 a week.

Lawrence Hospital in Bronxville saw 8 persons  of 14 person positive for covid  admissions.

Westchester Medical Center  saw 8  covid positives of 42  admissions (20%)  Friday that is perhaps 50 admissions for Covid a week.

Up in Yorktown, at New York Presbyterian Hudson Valley  they saw 8 of 14 admissions positive for covid (57% of admissions for covid. If infections grow, covid patients could grow past 50 a week, there.

I am not whistling Dixie here.

ONE WEEK AGO, DAILY COVID ADMISSIONS REPRESENTED AN AVERAGE 43% OF NEW HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS ON LONG ISLAND, THE MID-HUDSON REGION (INCLUDES WESTCHESTER) AND NEW YORK CITY. AS REPRESENTED IN THE NEW YORK STATE ADMISSIONS GRID BELOW:

The Mid-Hudson Region  as of last Monday, BELOW as well as Nassau and Suffolk and New York City shows the growth of patients suffering from covid ONE WEEK AGO.

JUST IN THIS AFTERNOON (BELOW) HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS BY REGION ONE WEEK LATER COVID ADMISSIONS CONTINUE TO MAKE UP AN AVERAGE 43% OF HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS IN THE 7 COUNTY MID-HUDSON REGION; LONG ISLAND AND NEW YORK CITY : LONG ISLAND, 165 IN ONE DAY1,155 A WEEK APPROXIMATE; MID-HUDSON REGION (INCLUDING WESTCHESTER), 128 A DAY (900 A WEEK APPROXIMATE) ; NEW YORK CITY 5 BOROUGHS: 373 A DAY (2,611 A WEEK APPROXIMATE. NOTE THE HIGH PERCENTAGES OF COVID ADMISSIONS THROUGHOUT NEW YORK STATE.

IN MID JANUARY HERE WAS THE PERFORMANCE OF 9 WESTCHESTER HOSPITALS AS OF JAN 17

SHOWING THE GROWTH OF HOSPITALIZATIONS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL HOSPITALS

They are a reminder that the more we socialize, the more risks we take, the wishful thinking that covid is in the rearview mirror is an excuse we are making to ourselves TO DO WHAT WE WANT.. Look in the sideview mirror. Covid is coming up in your blind spot. Don’t want to get a vaccine up date or booster? Well now you can your shots free. In May when the Emergency is lifted, you will pay as much as $130 for it.

You will not want to pay for the shot, and many of you will not be able to afford to, even though you cannot afford not to get the shot(s).