SUFFOLK COUNTY CLOSES 66 BEACHES for SWIMMING DUE TO RAIN RUNOFF. HAMPTONS NOT AFFECTED

WPCNR BAY WATCH. From the Suffolk County Government and the Town of Southampton. April 13, 2014:

If you are going to Long Island for beaches this weekend, you should be aware that 66 Beaches throughout Suffolk County  with the exception of the beaches on the South Fork of Long Island known as The Hamptons, are closed  today due to bacteria levels exceeding public safety standards, presumably due to rainwater runoff. It is not clear if sewage has infected the beaches as it has been known to do in southern Westchester communities after heavy rains.

The Town Supervisor’s Office for the Town of Southampton, summer playground of the well-connected, reports to WPCNR that their beaches are open, because that community did not get the amount of rain most of Suffolk County absorbed Wednesday. WPCNR suggests checking the Suffolk County Government website for updates on the closings going into the weekend.

August 13, 2014

Advisory Issued Against Bathing at 66 Suffolk County Beaches Due to Heavy Rainfall

Dr. James Tomarken, Commissioner of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, has issued an advisory against bathing at 66 beaches. (See list below.) The advisory is based on the potential that the presence of bacteria at levels that exceed New York State standards will impact these areas.

The beaches covered by the advisory are located in areas that are heavily influenced by stormwater runoff from the surrounding watersheds and/or adjacent tributaries, and because of their location in an enclosed embayment, experience limited tidal flushing.

The department recommends that bathing and other water contact be suspended in affected areas until the waters have been flushed by two successive tidal cycles (at least a 24 hour period) after the cessation of rainfall.  This advisory will be lifted at 7 p.m., Thursday, August 14, 2014, unless sampling conducted by the department finds elevated bacterial numbers persisting beyond the 24-hour period.

 Additionally, Copiague Harbor Beach and John Schiff Scout Reservation beach are also closed to bathing due to elevated bacteria levels.

For the latest information on affected beaches, call the Bathing Beach HOTLINE at 852-5822, contact the Suffolk County Department of Health Services’ Office of Ecology at 852-5760 during normal business hours, or visit the website link: www.suffolkcountyny.gov/health.

 

Suffolk County Department of Health Services66 Beaches Included in Bathing Advisory of 8/13/14

 

BEACH_NAME TOWN VILLAGE CURRENT_STATUS CONFLICT_TEXT
Amityville Village Beach Babylon Amityville Advisory Rainfall related
Tanner Park Beach Babylon Copiague Advisory Rainfall related
Venetian Shores Beach Babylon West Babylon Advisory Rainfall related
Copiague Harbor Beach Babylon Copiague Advisory Rainfall related
Sound Beach POA West Brookhaven Sound Beach Advisory Rainfall related
Tides Beach Brookhaven Sound Beach Advisory Rainfall related
Beech Road Beach (NSBA) Brookhaven Rocky Point Advisory Rainfall related
Broadway Beach (NSBA) Brookhaven Rocky Point Advisory Rainfall related
Friendship Drive Beach (NSBA) Brookhaven Rocky Point Advisory Rainfall related
Shoreham Village Beach Brookhaven Shoreham Advisory Rainfall related
Shoreham Beach Brookhaven East Shoreham Advisory Rainfall related
Corey Beach Brookhaven Blue Point Advisory Rainfall related
Shirley Beach Brookhaven Shirley Advisory Rainfall related
Stony Brook Beach Brookhaven Stony Brook Advisory Rainfall related
Stony Brook Yacht Club Beach Brookhaven Stony Brook Advisory Rainfall related
Shoreham Shore Club Beach Brookhaven East Shoreham Advisory Rainfall related
Miller Place Park Beach Brookhaven Miller Place Advisory Rainfall related
Scotts Beach Brookhaven Sound Beach Advisory Rainfall related
Woodhull Landing POA Beach Brookhaven Miller Place Advisory Rainfall related
Bayberry Cove Beach Brookhaven Setauket-East Setauket Advisory Rainfall related
Bayview Beach Brookhaven Setauket-East Setauket Advisory Rainfall related
Grantland Beach Brookhaven Setauket-East Setauket Advisory Rainfall related
Indian Field Beach Brookhaven Setauket-East Setauket Advisory Rainfall related
Little Bay Beach Brookhaven Setauket-East Setauket Advisory Rainfall related
Soundview Beach Association Beach Brookhaven Old Field Advisory Rainfall related
Terraces on the Sound Brookhaven Rocky Point Advisory Rainfall related
Eagle Dock Community Beach Huntington Cold Spring Harbor Advisory Rainfall related
Cold Spring Harbor Beach Club Beach Huntington Lloyd Harbor Advisory Rainfall related
West Neck Beach Huntington Lloyd Harbor Advisory Rainfall related
Lloyd Neck Bath Club Beach Huntington Lloyd Harbor Advisory Rainfall related
Lloyd Harbor Village Park Beach Huntington Lloyd Harbor Advisory Rainfall related
Gold Star Battalion Park Beach Huntington Huntington Advisory Rainfall related
Head of the Bay Club Beach Huntington Huntington Bay Advisory Rainfall related
Nathan Hale Beach Club Beach Huntington Huntington Bay Advisory Rainfall related
Baycrest Association Beach Huntington Huntington Bay Advisory Rainfall related
Bay Hills Beach Association Huntington Huntington Bay Advisory Rainfall related
Crescent Beach Huntington Huntington Bay Advisory Rainfall related
Knollwood Beach Association Beach Huntington Huntington Advisory Rainfall related
Fleets Cove Beach Huntington Huntington Advisory Rainfall related
Centerport Beach Huntington Centerport Advisory Rainfall related
Huntington Beach Community Association Beach Huntington Centerport Advisory Rainfall related
Steers Beach Huntington Northport Advisory Rainfall related
Asharoken Beach Huntington Asharoken Advisory Rainfall related
Hobart Beach Huntington Northport Advisory Rainfall related
Crab Meadow Beach Huntington Northport Advisory Rainfall related
Wincoma Association Beach Huntington Huntington Bay Advisory Rainfall related
Valley Grove Beach Huntington Eatons Neck Advisory Rainfall related
Prices Bend Beach Huntington Eatons Neck Advisory Rainfall related
West Islip Beach Islip West Islip Advisory Rainfall related
Benjamins Beach Islip Bay Shore Advisory Rainfall related
Islip Beach Islip Islip Advisory Rainfall related
East Islip Beach Islip East Islip Advisory Rainfall related
West Oaks Recreation Club Beach Islip West Sayville Advisory Rainfall related
Brightwater Village Beach Islip Brightwaters Advisory Rainfall related
Sayville Beach Islip Sayville Advisory Rainfall related
Bayport Beach Islip Bayport Advisory Rainfall related
Sayville Marina Park Beach Islip Sayville Advisory Rainfall related
Lake Ronkonkoma – Islip Town Beach Islip Ronkonkoma Advisory Rainfall related
Bayberry Beach & Tennis Club Beach Islip Islip Advisory Rainfall related
Callahans Beach Smithtown Northport Advisory Rainfall related
Short Beach Smithtown Nissequogue Advisory Rainfall related
Nissequogue Point Beach Smithtown Nissequogue Advisory Rainfall related
Long Beach Smithtown Nissequogue Advisory Rainfall related
Schubert Beach Smithtown Nissequogue Advisory Rainfall related
Hecksher State Park – West Beach Islip Islip Advisory Rainfall related
Hecksher State Park – West Beach Islip Islip Advisory Rainfall related

 

Posted in Uncategorized

The Bat Files: Photographs of the Day

Bats010

Pictures of a bat recently brought in by a Westchester County resident for rabies testing by the County Department of Health. From The Westchester County Department of Health

Bats007

Caren Halbfinger, spokesperson for the Westchester County Department of Health reports residents who find a bat in their home, attic, basement, wherever to capture the bat and bring it to the Department of Health for testing either dead or alive.  The brain must be preserved to be tested. The best way to kill the bat is by freezing them.
“Bats lick themselves while grooming and saliva remains on their claws. If the bat is rabid, a person can be infected either by a bite or through saliva on the bat’s claws” (when scratched…of if a claw touches the person when sleeping for example) If you have been exposed to a bat. Catch the bat without touching it and bring it to the County for testing…call 813-5000

 

 

 

Bats009

Ms. Halbfinger told WPCNR today, the bat population has rebounded after being decimated by the fungus called white nose syndrome.
“Bats enter (homes) wherever they can, through the eaves or a tiny opening, often in the attic. When it gets too hot, they seek a cooler location, often in the house. We tend to see more bats in August because it is a time when baby bats are beginning to grow stronger and explore their surroundings.

Bats010

To see a video on how to capture a bat, go to
http://youtu.be/_YhnV5WJQBA


Posted in Uncategorized

What are the City Brass doing on FASNY? What will happen next in the process? Where is “Transparency” on FASNY? FASNY FIGHTER ASKS.

WPCNR LETTER TICKER. August 14, 2014.(The following letter to the Mayor of White Plains and the Common Council was submitted to WPCNR for publication with permission):

In your continuing coverage of the FASNY proposal I am forwarding you a letter I sent to the Common Council on Aug 7, 2014. You may post this on your website.
Carry Kyzivat
To Mayor Roach and Councilmembers Hunt-Robinson, Lecuona, Kirkpatrick, Krolian, Martin, Smayda:

I feel compelled to reiterate the concerns and questions that I brought to your attention at the Common Council FASNY Public Hearings last Monday.

The unprecedented involvement of some many concerned residents stems from the fact that, not only was the previous FASNY documentation which resulted in an FEIS riddled with problems, but now the FASNY “De-mapping of Hathaway Lane” and the “Site Plan and Special Permit” documentation again contain innumerable misinformation, contradictions and inaccuracies . The public has responded by providing the enormous amount of information that you have received from residents both at the 2 hearings and undoubtedly in emails, letters and personal conversations.

Therefore, it is imperative  that the public’s input and critique be used by city staff, outside legal and professional consultants and others to analyze the two latest FASNY proposals. The  work and studies of the White Plains residents must be given equal if not more weight than documentation provided by the applicant. That is what Public Hearings and Input are all about.

The council, in turn, must study, question, deliberate in depth the resulting information in order to achieve an objective and fair outcome for White Plains, all its residents, voters and tax payers and in particular the residents of neighborhoods that could be so severely and negatively impacted by the FASNY proposal.

There needs to be a publicly known process to achieve  this goal. At this point there does not seem to be such a process.

Therefore, so that each member of the council and the mayor, city staff, boards, commissions and all residents can develop and understand the process, it is imperative that these questions be answered:

  • Who is collecting and categorizing all the information received to date and which will continue to arrive until the hearings are closed?
  • Is this occurring in the Planning Dept? In the mayor’s office? in the office of corporation counsel?
  • Is it being delivered for review to the outside counsel/Mr. Silverberg and/or his staff? What is the role of Mr. Silverberg in this process?
  • What is the role of TRC in the collecting and reviewing process?
  • Why is city staff  – Mr. Callahan, Commissioner Cheteny, Commissioners and others, and outside counsel Mr. Silverberg –  not present in chambers during the Public Hearings when FASNY has its attorney and consultants sitting in the room?
  • Why has Mr. Silverberg not spoken publicly or delineated the process as he did for the EIS process?
  • Is any review taking place at this time or will it only take place after the hearings are closed?
  • As residents’ comments are received and heard by council members who do they turn to for clarification and analysis and how does this occur? Is it by phone or frequent email exchanges with staff or others?
  • Will there be a period of public comment after the hearings are closed? If so, for how long?
  • Who will prepare the final document upon which the council will make its determination ? What time period will the council have to study the document before a vote takes place?
  • Will the document be available online and at city hall and at the library and will the public be  notified?

I believe it is extremely important that these questions be publicly responded to and that the promised policy of transparency be made an actuality. It will shed a more positive light on this administration and squelch any thoughts among the residents that – according to a popular saying – “don’t confuse me with facts, my mind’s all made up”.

Lastly, I have just viewed the city’s website and see that the announcement for the next Public Hearing (Sept 8 , 2014, 6.30 pm) has been posted but the location still remains at City Hall.

Has not experience taught you that such a meeting will attract an attendance that cannot safely be accommodated in City Hall Chambers???? There is still plenty of time to make other arrangements as has been requested and suggested by many caring residents. And furthermore, it is still not clear if the regular monthly meeting will take place on Tuesday Sept 2!

I am taking the liberty of sharing this communication with many of those that have spoken at the hearings as well as with some of the neighborhood associations so that they too can urge you to activate an open process.

Sincerely,

Carry Kyzivat, 17 Maplemoor Lane 10605

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

FASNY FIGHTING IS DAVID VS. GOLIATH: MISSING FINANCING BRINGS ABILITY TO EXECUTE PLAN INTO QUESTION

WPCNR LETTER TICKER. August 13, 2014:

DAVID vs. GOLIATH

THE BATTLE CONTINUES

Over the course of the last three years, I have written many letters to you, Mayor Roach and Common Council members, voicing my opposition to the French-American School of New York’s proposed project.  One of my letters referred to the events unfolding as a David vs. Goliath battle.

That analogy still applies because this is not a level playing field and never has been.  FASNY has an army of consultants, lawyers, and public relations personnel as part of its team.  Despite this array, the opposition is resolute, has fought back hard, and has gained the support of a broad cross section of White Plains residents.  The more that is revealed about the FASNY project, the more the opposition grows.

From FASNY’s very first plan, shown at a presentation by the Gedney Association on 1/06/11, the proposed project has morphed and expanded until it has reached the current size of 261,200 sq. feet on a 53.2-acre campus.

Like “The Blob,” in the classic Steve McQueen horror movie, the project has been spreading and devouring the former Ridgeway Country Club. Looking at the plan shown at that January meeting is surreal, because by 1/29/11, at an open house, FASNY presented a plan so different and so much larger, that it seemed like slight of hand. See http://whiteplainsusa.com/ridgeway01.htm   The first plan appears practically benign in comparison to the current monster.

Following the Finding Statement, which called for reduced student enrollment from 1,200 to 950, FASNY did something completely counterintuitive in its Special Permit/Site Plan Application submitted 5/21/14.  It did not decrease the size of the proposed buildings.

It increased the size by 30,337 sq. ft.  Why is this latest increase necessary?  The explanations offered by the FASNY team at the 7/15/14 Planning Board meeting do not pass the smell test.  The only logical explanation is that, if allowed to build the school, at some future date, FASNY will return to the Common Council to ask for an increase in enrollment to the original 1,200, or perhaps even more.

Vintage French Whine

At the same Planning Board meeting, FASNY representatives mentioned the enormous cost of constructing bicycle paths and the 3,000 foot access road from North St.  Cost was an attraction when FASNY bought the Ridgeway Country Club property at a fire sale price because the club was close to bankruptcy.

With the club a financial ruin, FASNY thought it could roll into Gedney Farms and be welcomed like General Charles de Gaulle when Paris was liberated in World War II.  Funny thing about that — expectations are often greater than the outcome.  FASNY embarked on its journey by buying the property at record speed and without the necessary due diligence.  That this ignorance about the environmentally sensitive property it bought, and its residential location, is now causing FASNY financial indigestion, is solely FASNY’s problem, not White Plains’ problem.  Caveat Emptor!

Funding is cited as a reason why some of the earlier construction plans for Phase I, proposed to begin in the fall of 2014, will be delayed until Phase II, which is scheduled to be completed no later than 2025.  This incredibly long time frame, to which Gedney Farms residents will be subjected, is due to FASNY’s need to replenish its finances between Phases.

Previously, when FASNY’s ability to pay for the entire project was questioned, FASNY blew off the concern, saying that as a non-profit, it did not have to provide financials.

Because of this refusal to reveal whether it was financially sound, FASNY continued unimpeded and we now face the possibility that once started, financial deficits could result in the inability of FASNY to complete the proposed project.  This would be a disaster for White Plains, Gedney Farms and, of course, FASNY.

Despite the fact that FASNY has obtained a $60 million dollar loan guarantee from the French Government, that sum is not enough money to complete the bloated project.  FASNY needs at least another $20 million and possibly more. At this point, it has only raised $3.5 million, which is far below its needs.

That explains why it is searching for a Director of Development, whose main job will be fund raising.  FASNY will no doubt be very aggressive in this pursuit.  Since financing the entire project appears to be a serious problem, wouldn’t a reduction in the size of the buildings to reflect the lower enrollment, help alleviate the money issue?   Increasing the square footage is illogical.

Money is also cited as a cause for possible delays in implementing Stage II of the proposed Conservancy restoration.  FASNY previously stated, and continues to state, that a number of its “aspirational” plans will have to wait for funding as well as approvals from NYSDEC and the City of White Plains.

The funding may never arrive, and I don’t see how the Common Council can force FASNY to raise the funds for Stage II.  It is also possible that the needed approvals may not be granted.  Reaching into a bag of fairy dust and sprinkling it around will not result in aspirations being realized.  Stage II could be put on the back burner permanently.

The Conservancy Master Plan spells out Stage 2 Implementation on page 14, and is shown below.

“The following elements of the Conservancy may be implemented over time as funding becomes available:

.  Wetland habitat restoration adjacent to the large pond and in the southeastern corner of Parcel D, subject to grant funding and NYSDEC permitting.

.  Stream restoration on Parcel C and on Parcel D conducted in coordination with any wetland habitat restoration and subject to grant funding and potential NYSDEC permitting.

.  Construction of an observation deck and/or pier in the large pond could be pursued subject to available funding and NYSDEC and City of White Plains permitting.  FASNY believes that the observation deck and/or pier would be an opportunity to enhance the educational value of the large pond and associated wetlands.

.  Construction of a wetland boardwalk and outlook for educational interpretation of the wetland covering the southeastern portion of Parcel D could be pursued subject to available funding and NYSDEC and City of White Plains permitting.  FASNY believes that a wetland boardwalk and outlook area would be an opportunity to enhance the educational value of the forested wetlands area.

.  Construction of a propagation greenhouse on Parcel D.

.  Construction of a shade structure on Parcel D.”

All the stipulations in this section of the Conservancy Master Plan give FASNY the perfect excuse not to fulfill its “aspirational” promises.

A Neighborhood in Jeopardy

The one thing about the FASNY project that has not changed from the outset is that it is still the wrong project in the wrong place.  Here are some of the reasons:

.   It so obviously does not fit in with the character of the neighborhood.

.   It will exacerbate traffic on the North St. corridor and still bring traffic to Ridgeway.

.   Our own students’ safety will be compromised by this traffic.

.   Its outsize plan will harm fragile and environmentally sensitive land.

.   Its economic benefits are vastly overstated.

.   It will contribute to an increase in real estate taxes because FASNY is tax-exempt.

.   It is already harming property values in Gedney Farms.

.   The majority of Gedney Farms and its neighbors in southern White Plains are dead set

against the proposed project.

 

This litany of reasons should make you realize that the requested Special Permits must be denied.  To do otherwise would leave the leaders of this City’s government with the unwelcome legacy of having presided over irreparable damage to historic Gedney Farms.

 

Respectfully,

Ellen Alzerez

August 11, 2014

 

Posted in Uncategorized