WHITE PLAINS WEEK NOW ON THE INTERNET AND TONIGHT 7:30 ON THE FASNY DENIAL–EXCLUSIVE WPW VIDEO — ON THE INTERNET NOW AND TONIGHT AT 7:30 ON FIOS CH. 45, CABLEVISION CH. 76

 

WhitePlainsWeekkeysign

2015327wpw 010RKOTower

WHITE PLAINS WEEK TRUTH AROUND THE WORLD

HERE WE GO!

ON THE FASNY TURN DOWN

THE FASNY LAWSUIT THREATS

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO

THE SURPRISE CALL FOR COMPANY TO DEVELOP STRATEGIC PLAN FOR TRAIN STATION

THE STATE SALES TAXES $$ SOFTEN SIGNIFICANTLY–COMPTROLLER

BUCHWALD ANNOUNCES NEW FUNDING FROM STATE FOR WESTCHESTER RIVERS, LAKES  REPAIR AND CLEASNING

AND

A FASNY COVERAGE

EXCLUSIVE!

JOHN SHEEHAN

PRESIDENT OF THE GEDNEY ASSOCIATION

ON

WHAT THE  HATHAWAY LANE DENIAL MEANS

WHAT’S NEXT?

WHY HE THINKS IT WILL HOLD UP IN COURT

KATZ AND BAILEY INTERVIEW SHEEHAN

NOW AT

www.whiteplainsweek.com

2014613sheehan 007

JOHN SHEEHAN, CENTER IN A PREVIOUS APPEARANCE ON PEOPLE TO BE HEARD…APPEARS AGAIN ON WESTCHESTER COUNTY’S MOST RELEVANT INTERVIEW PROGRAM “PEOPLE TO BE HEARD” SEE  THE INTERVIEW RECORDED IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE FASNY DENIAL BY THE COMMON COUNCIL.

Posted in Uncategorized

70 Years Ago Yesterday — The Atomic Bomb Was Dropped on Hiroshima

WPCNR OBSERVATIONS. August 6, 2015:

Seventy years ago in 1945, the Enola Gay, a single American bomber dropped an Atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan.

The terrible effects of that single bomb are a horror that has never been repeated

A second bomber, Bock’s Car on August 9, dropped another atomic bomb on Nagasaki.

Unknown thousands of Japanese citizens’ lives were vaporized, burned,  and maimed and two cities leveled to the ground in an instant in both bombings.

To grasp what one atomic bomb did to Nagasaki. Readers may see the photographs Japanese photographer Yosuki Yamato took of the aftermath of Nagasaki the day it happened at http://www.exploratorium.edu/nagasaki/photos.html#journey/63.jpg

The decision to drop the bombs was made after the United States, Great Britain and the Republic of China demanded Japan  surrender in the Potsdam Declaration on July 26 or face  “prompt and utter destruction”.

The Japanese government did not surrender.

The United States deployed two nuclear weapons  dropping one on Hiroshimi, 70 years ago yesterday and one on Nagasaki on August 9.

Over four months the bombs resulted in the deaths of   90,000–166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000–80,000 in Nagasaki, half dying the day the bombs fell.

The Hiroshima prefecture health department estimated that, of the people who died on the day of the explosion, 60% died from flash or flame burns, 30% from falling debris and 10% from other causes. During the following months, large numbers died from the effect of burns, radiation sickness, and other injuries, compounded by illness.

In a US estimate of the total immediate and short term cause of death, 15–20% died from radiation sickness, 20–30% from burns, and 50–60% from other injuries, compounded by illness. In both cities, most of the dead were civilians, although Hiroshima had a sizeable garrison.

The horror of those two bombings and the aftermath, the injuries created have resulted in an effort and reluctance on the part of nuclear-armed powers to avoid any nuclear attacks since that date.

Within a few days of those bombings, Japan surrendered unconditionally, officially ending World War II.

The decision to use the bombs by the United States has long been debated. A dialogue on what the bombs did, why the decision was made was collected in 1995, the fiftieth year since the bombings. It is available at http://www.exploratorium.edu/nagasaki/commentary/decision.html

Posted in Uncategorized

CLOSURE OF HATHAWAY LANE REJECTED. FASNY SITE PLAN TABLED. FASNY VOWS LAWSUIT IN MILLIONS.

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey.  AUGUST 5, 2015:

Four and a half years of review of the French American School of New York plan to build a regional campus on the site of the former Ridgeway Country Club ended last night in defeat for the school temporarily, at least, pending a promised lawsuit by the school to reverse the decision.

With Councilpersons Nadine Hunt-Robinson, Dennis Krolian and Milogros Lecuona voting against the closure of Hathway Lane, countering the yes votes of John Kirkpatrick, John Martin, Beth Smayda and Mayor Roach, resulting in a 4-3 in favor vote on the Hathaway Lane Closure measure  (required to proceed with the FASNY site plan, the second item before the council tonight), the council vote falling one vote short of the 5-2 super majority needed to close the street.

2015805fasny 052

Councilperson Nadine Hunt-Robinson third from foreground, signaled she had not changed her mind. Councilperson Beth Smayda second from front and John Martin, front, both supported the closure; Martin fearing what restrictions a possible unfavorable court decision would impose on the city.

That one vote shy was provided right at the beginning of the proceedings about 5 past 7 when Councilperson Nadine Hunt-Robinson,(appointed by Mayor Roach and the Common Council to replace Benjamin Boykin in January, 2014, was elected in 2014 to complete Boykin’s term and is up for election for  a four-term this November), began her comments on the Hathaway Lane closure, the first item for voting.

There was no suspence.
Hunt-Robinson and John Martin were the only councilpersons in June to express new concerns on the Hathaway Lane closure measure. If either one stuck to their guns the closure was doomed.

It was.

Hunt-Robinson read her prepared statement praised the work of FASNY, the city consultants and staff, and the arguments made in favor of closing Hathaway, but she said she was very concerned about emergency response times that she said the Department of Public Safety had said would suffer due to road closure, and for that reason, she would vote “no” on the project, echoing her comments made June 29. Apparently all the city’s lawyers and consultants and Mayor’s men and women could not convince her otherwise (if they attempted to do so) in the last 36 days since her June 29 surprise.

Councilperson Beth Smayda said she voted in favor the environmental findings statement in December 13 and would vote yes on the Hathaway Lane closure as did long supporter of the project, Councilperson John Kirkpatrick.

2015805fasny 050

Milagros Lecuona, opposed to the project from the start due to what she described as a flawed plan, echoed that sentiment again, and said any decision had to be based on what is right for the persons in the community which she said should be any counilperson’s guiding principle.

2015805fasny 051

Dennis Krolian based his intention to vote no on the recent Cornell decision where a judge decided that a school could be denied if the community thought it would create unsafe conditions for the public.

Milagros Lecouna and Dennis Krolian back to back were next to speak and each reiterated their positions to vote “no” on the Hathaway Lane closure. Lecouna for safety reasons and Krolian basing his reasoning on the recent court case decision 

The die was cast. There would be no approval of the FASNY campus. Council President John Martin said though he had expressed doubts on the Hathaway Lane closure, he would vote Yes because of the uncertain nature of what a court would order White Plains to allow if the court decided in favor of FASNY in any lawsuit.

The Mayor also voted “Yes” and said the Hathaway closure was defeated. He called the question on the site plan though he stated it could not proceed. The Mayor said he would “vigorously defend” the city in any possible lawsuit.

The Council then voted to table the ordinance approving the site plan.

The French American School of New York issued a statement  saying “we will immediately commence legal action in New York State, as well as possibly Federal Court, seeking an overturning of the City Council’s decision and potential millions of dollars in damages.”

Asked for comment FASNY officials referred WPCNR to their spokesperson Geof Thompson, who issued this statement:

“We are deeply disappointed and disturbed by the outcome of tonight’s vote by the White Plains Common Council. While some members of the Council understood that the plan for our school and publicly accessible Open Space Conservancy meets all environmental and legal criteria and has been fully and thoroughly vetted, others sided with a group of neighborhood opponents and rejected the plan.

This is the same group of opponents who fought the City when it sought to purchase the property for a municipal golf course and pool (Editor’s note: in fall of 2010 when the council was not the same as tonight’s group, Mr. Krolian, Mr. Kirkpatick, and Ms. Hunt-Robinson were not on that council)

We believe this decision is unsustainable on many grounds. As a result, we will immediately commence legal action in New York State, as well as possibly Federal Court, seeking an overturning of the City Council’s Decision and potential millions of dollars in damages. We are confident that we will prevail, have the right to build the school, and that the rejection of the plan was arbitrary and capricious at best.

The Council had previously voted 6-1 that all environmental findings under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) had been met and there is no legitimate basis to now reject the plan. It is a shame that some members of this Council have sought fit to engage this City in a needless and expensive legal battle that it will lose, and cost White Plains taxpayers significant sums of money. After nearly five years of the most intensive review given to any development plan in City history, and despite numerous revisions and compromises that we have made to address the concerns of the public and the City, the rejection of a School, a very well respected one at that, is utterly unreasonable and illegal.

We have the support of hundreds of neighborhood residents, environmental organizations and the leading business organizations in Westchester County. White Plains has a well-deserved reputation as a center for schools and education, and diversity. We remain confident that the Court will uphold our plan, and that our school will become an important part of this rich community of White Plains soon.”

 

2015806 003

 John Sheehan,(above) President of the Gedney Farms Association, commenting to WPCNR after the meeting said,

“We’re very gratified by the decision tonight, and the very eloquent comments by Councilwoman Lecuona, Hunt-Robinson and Councilman Krolian. I think it’s now time for FASNY to move on. Don’t waste an more money of their school’s resources. Find another site, an appropriate site can be found.

I fine their threats to our government to be very inappropriate in trying to force a vote in their favor.”

Posted in Uncategorized

FASNY FULL PAGE AD AND LETTER TO COUNCIL AND MAYOR “NOT WORTHY OF AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION”–GEDNEY ASSOCIATION

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. August 5, 2015:

Dear Members of the Common Council:

The recent letter from FASNY to our elected representatives as well as the FASNY sponsored advertisement in the Journal News threatening litigation and suggesting enormous damages to the City are both highly inappropriate and not worthy of an educational institution.  Coming just days before the Common Council’s pending decisions on the FASNY application these actions are a disreputable effort to coerce a favorable vote to it and to intimidate the Common Council. 

No one denies the right of anyone to take legal action.  In fact, regardless of the decisions in this matter litigation is possible.  However, the brazen actions of FASNY to try to so blatantly intimidate Common Council members show an unusual disrespect for the approval process and our elected governmental officials in particular.  This is not the first time that FASNY employed such offensive tactics.  Remember how they insulted the School Board and Planning Board members when they spoke out against the FASNY plans. 

Obviously, the Common Council should never let the threat of litigation be a factor in their deliberations.  I am confident that our Common Council will not bend to such unsavory efforts.

FASNY has every right to pursue a new campus for its school.  It is clear however that the former Ridgeway Country Club is the wrong site.  For FASNY not to recognize this reality and instead undertake a “scorched earth strategy” is unseemly, discredits it and will result in lasting damage to its reputation.

Very truly yours, 

John E. Sheehan

President, The Gedney Association

Posted in Uncategorized