Con ED: Customers can “Opt Out” of Being Automatically Switched to an Electronic Service Company In Advance. Just tell Con ED: “I’d Rather Stay than Switch.”

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. By John F. Bailey. November 6, 2015:

Customers who currently have an electric company they are happy with can tell their present supplier they do not want to be switched to another, Con Edison told WPCNR today.

Recently, the White Plains Common Council voted to join a consortium of cities and towns that have agreed to allow a group called Sustainable Westchester to negotiate a contract with a series of suppliers or a supplier.

Sustainable Westchester would use the vast number of electric customers in the collection of town and city customers in the Sustainable fold to negotiate, they promise a reduced collective electric contract with an Electric Supply Company or companies for those customers including White Plains electric customers.

The Mayor and council and Sustainable Westchester executives assured this arrangement would save White Plainsers substantially on their electric bills.

Once the contract rate is determined, White Plains would automatically switch residents’ electric supply source to the suppliers chosen by Sustainable Westchester. Customers would have 20 days to notify Sustainable Westchester or the City of White Plains (it is not clear at this time who processes the “opt-outs”)

WPCNR asked Con Edison if residential customers not wishing to be switched at all  from Con Edison could “opt out in advance,”

The answer from Robert McGee of Consolidated Edison Media Relations is “Yes.”

Mr. McGee issued this statement to WPCNR Friday afternoon:

“I have your answer.

If a Con Edison customer decides they do not want to be a part of the Sustainable Westchester initiative, they can instruct Con Edison to place an energy service company (ESCO) ‘block’ on their account.  

Importantly, this block also would preclude a customer from signing up with any energy supply company, whether related to Sustainable Westchester or not.  If a customer subsequently decides to choose another ESCO, they would have to contact Con Edison to remove the block prior to enrolling with the new ESCO.  

Posted in Uncategorized

Response from Gedney Association

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. NOVEMBER 6, 2015:

A RESPONSE TO THE ELIZABETH KURTH LETTER

Ms. Elizabeth Kurth’s recent diatribe against those opposed to the defeated FASNY project was both unfortunate and disappointing.    Ms Kurth misses what was at issue during the long FASNY saga.  The reputation of the school was never the problem.  The public record over the last four years is replete with documentation citing the real substantive issues: density, traffic, environmental degradation, hydrology, pollution, fire safety and residential values.

The election results could not be more clear:  the three Council people who voted against FASNY were resoundingly reelected.   And yes Ms. Kurth, The Gedney Association does represent the views of the overwhelming majority of residents in the neighborhood.  Ms. Kurth forgot to mention the opposition of the School Board, The Conservation Board and The Planning Board to key aspects of the FASNY plan. She also neglected to mention the seven other neighborhood associations in the south end of the City that joined the Gedney Association in publicly declaring their opposition to the FASNY complex.  Nor does she mention the other neighborhood associations outside the immediate area that also publicly opposed the FASNY project and the over 2,000 residents from all 28 of the City’s neighborhoods who signed a petition against the project.

Understandably, most of the people who spoke in favor of FASNY had some connection to the school.   Nonetheless, all those in favor as well as those opposed to the FASNY complex were entitled to their views and opinions.   

The FASNY development has been turned down and is now behind us and it’s time to move ahead.  We respectfully request that Ms. Kurth accept the differing views of the majority of her neighbors and the decision of the electorate regarding the Common Council members who rejected the FASNY project. Let’s move forward together towards a use for the former Ridgeway Country Club that preserves as much open space as possible and that is truly compatible with the environmentally sensitive property and the character of the neighborhoods that surround it. 

John E. Sheehan, President

The Gedney Association

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

County Legislator Results with 100% of Vote Counted: 9 Democrats, 8 Republicans. White Plains Democrats Return to Common Council for Four Years.

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2015. From the Westchester County Board of Elections. November 4, 2015:

The Westchester County Legislature results from election day, pending official recanvas will still have 9 Democratic County Legislators and 8 Republicans after all machine ballots were counted.

In the City of White Plains, Nadine Hunt-Robinson, the deciding Council vote in the French American School denial in August was the leading vote getter, polling 3,662 to Councilman Dennis Krolian’s 3,635 and Milagros Lecuona’s 3,318. Hunt-Robinson, Krolian and Lecuona will serve through 2019. Annemarie Encarnacao, in a second attempt to be elected to the Council, running as the lone Republican candidate received 1,578 votes. The margin of victory was 30% of the vote compared to 13% for the Republican.

Here’s the breakdown of the County Legislature results:

District 1- John Testa (R) ran unopposed.

District 2- Francis Corcoran (R) defeated Kare Schleimer (D), 4,900 to 4,385 votes, pending recanvas.

District 3-Marget Cunzio (R) defeated Jon Diaconis, 4,043 to 3,156

District 4-Michael Kaplowitz (D) ran unopposed.

District 5-Benjamin Boykin (D) ran unopposed

District 6-David Gelfarb (R) ran unopposed.

District 7- Catherine Parker(D) defeated Susan Watson 5,088 votes to 3,606

District 8- Alfreda Williams (D) ran unopposed.

District 9- Catherine Borgia (D) Defeated Katherine Mamone , 4,896 to 2,621 votes,

District 10- Sheila Marcotte (R) defeated Haina Just Michael, 4,454 to 4,030 pending recanvas,

District 11- James Maisano (R) ran unopposed.

District 12–Mary Jane Shimsky (D) ran unopposed.

District 13- Lyndon Williams (D) ran unopposed.

District 14–Bernice Spreckman (R) defeated Christine Peters (D) 2,851 to 2,409 votes pending recanvas.

District 15– Gordon Burrows (R) defeated Kathleen Thomas, 3,804 to 2,571 votes.

District 16–Kenneth Jenkins (D) ran unopposed

District 17- Virginia Perez (D) defeated Piedad Abreu, 2,053 to 594 votes.

IN COURT RACES,

Gretchen Walsh was elected to Supreme Court Justice.

Susan Cacace was elected County Court Justice

Brandon Sall was elected Surrogate Judge.

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized