Hits: 0
WPCNR MR. AND MRS. AND MS. WHITE PLAINS VOICE. March 29, 2005: Mike Graessle, former Commissioner of Planning delivered the following commentary at the Comprehensive Plan Review Committee’s Third Public Meeting this evening, delivering a planner’s “take” on housing and neighborhood issues in the surrounding “donut” area of the city. Here is the text of his statement:
Affordable Housing
The Comprehensive Plan should include a statement that supports the
current program for creation of affordable rental units as part of new
multiple-family rental apartment buildings. The six percent set-aside
for affordable housing in newly-approved rental apartments has worked
to provide additional affordable units for rent. The City should
formalize and continue this process. The location of the units ––Core
Area or Close-in Neighborhoods––depends on the applicant and is
desirable in both areas.
The Comprehensive Plan should also deal with affordable housing
purchase units. This is a more difficult issue than rental affordable
housing since the cost of building affordable housing in what are often
high-end luxury buildings presents an entirely different set of
planning constraints. Developers are not likely to want to market
affordable units in a luxury building since it could discourage
high-end buyer interest.
Also, if amenities in a luxury building are
uniformly included in the monthly maintenance, the monthly costs would
likely be too high for the typical first-time affordable housing buyer,
thereby undermining the basic rationale. Further, affordable purchase
housing is best situated in areas that provide the public amenities
that appeal to young first-time home buyers with families; for them,
parks and schools are important. Still further, Core Area land values
are usually too high–– it would make economic sense to consider
Close-in Neighborhoods for locating affordable purchase housing.
Whether in a townhouse format, low- or mid-rise building, these units
would have the advantage of lower land costs and would likely be more
compatible with surrounding residences. Areas such as the Eastview
Neighborhood are experiencing new development and could support new
affordable housing. The opportunity to raze older houses in need of
extensive repair and replace them with new affordable housing would
benefit many of the Close-in Neighborhoods.
Comments on Core Area and Close-in Neighborhoods
Community Development Block Grants
The Federal Government is considering changes in block grant programs
and the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) is among those
being considered for elimination or major change. Since this CDBG has
been a life-line for many of the programs in White Plains it is likely
that some alternative plans may be in order for:
The Core Area: Funding changes could have a deleterious impact on the
downtown neighborhood. Mitchell Place, Winbrook, Slater Center,
sidewalk improvements, etc. Can the Post Road improvement proceed
without CDBG funds?
The Close-in Neighborhoods: The City should take a pro-active stance on
the Housing Rehabilitation Program (HRP) that has been a life-line for
the Close-in Neighborhoods. Although a revolving loan fund was wisely
created years ago, the staff that administers the Housing Rehab Program
is supported by the CDBG; without their expertise the program wouldn’t
work. The Comprehensive Plan should recognize the importance of HRP
and recommend its continuation to help keep the Close-in Neighborhoods
vital.
Traffic
neighborhood quality of life. Traffic continues to be a significant
concern to many of the Close-in Neighborhood residents. During the
rush hours many drivers seek faster routes to and from their work
places downtown; slow-moving traffic on the major streets encourages
the use of neighborhood streets as alternatives. A suggestion that
might discourage the cut-through traffic is to move traffic better on
the major arteries. For example, when cars are parked on major streets
during rush hour, travel lanes are frequently reduced to one as cars
pull into and out of parking spaces. Therefore in the morning rush
hour, eliminate parking on the in-bound side of major streets between
7:30 am and 9:00 am, and, in the evening, eliminate parking on the
out-bound side of major streets between 4:30 pm and 6:00 pm. This
regulation should increase the carrying capacity of major streets and
should reduce traffic in the Close-in Neighborhoods.
.
Parking
Another problem is the overflow of commercial Core Area parkers seeking
to avoid the meters by spilling into Close-in Neighborhood streets,
e.g., Linda, Smith, Davis and Oakwood Avenues. This problem could be
resolved by limiting parking time or some similar program. Here, again,
the Comprehensive Plan should encourage better regulations and
enforcement programs to protect the quality of life for these areas.
Code Enforcement
about violations of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and Building Codes for
economic benefit of a few. Recent fires and discoveries of significant
code violations make this a very high priority.
The Comprehensive Plan should spell out the critical importance of
vigorous code enforcement to protect the residents’ quality of life.
Marginal Lots
Developers’ submissions to create buildable lots out of marginal
properties, many with wetlands, steep slopes and similar features, are
a unique problem, particularly in the Close-in Neighborhoods where
smaller lot size requirements contribute to difficult lot
configurations which affect neighboring properties. This can also
result in more requests for variances since owners must locate proposed
structures in areas that do not meet existing zoning requirements.
New York Hospital Property
This key property continues to be a topic that provokes discord within
the community. While everyone seems to agree that some part of the
land should be made available for public open space and/or park use,
public efforts to acquire a portion of the property for this purpose
have not coincided with the Hospital’s development proposals.
This Comprehensive Planning process might furnish an appropriate method
for exploring alternative possibilities. Not considered so far has
been the process used to acquire Liberty Park with land from the
County of Westchester, that is, to lease a portion of the New York
Hospital property. Such an arrangement might establish a more workable
format for both the City and the Hospital.
The Comprehensive Plan should recommend the Bryant Avenue frontage and
the wetland area as the two sectors of the property most likely to be
of interest to City residents.




