On America’s Birthday: What Were Leaders Like then?

Hits: 0

 

WPCNR PROFILES IN CHARACTER. By John F. Bailey. July 4, 2007: It is the 231st birthday of our  nation, commemorating the signing of the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia in 1776. I usually run this column on George Washington’s birthday, however, in light of the chracter being shown lately by our leaders, it is instructive to look at our first leader, George Washington, the father of our nation.  One cannot help be reminded of the snowy winter at Valley Forge, when the bedraggled, poorly equipped rebel army suffered but held together, and attacked the Hessians in Trenton on Christmas Eve, 1776, crossing the Delaware River at night. What kind of man was he that George Washington could inspire his troops against all odds?

Washington was a man of tremendous character. Where did he get this character? He specialized in self-control at an early age.


 

 



Reenacters Marching to Raise Old Glory at Purdy House in Honor of George Washington’s Birthday. Photo, 2003 WPCNR News Archive.


 



According to The American President, Washington, at sixteen, had formed a code of conduct. He had written a book of etiquette with 110 “maxims” to guide his conduct in matters. In this etiquette book he had written, Every action done in company ought to be done with a sign of respect to those who are not present. Sleep not when others speak; sit not whwn others stand; speak not when you should hold your peace; walk not when others stop;…Let your countenance be pleasant but in serious matters somewhat grave…Undertake not what you cannot perform but be careful to keep your promise.

According to the character sketch provided by the authors of The American President, this personal “rulebook” was a book that Washington wrote over the years and referred to it often, “for self-control, to avoid temptation, to elude greed, to control his temper. Reputation was everything to him. It had to do with his strength, his size, his courage, his horsemanship, his precise dress, his thorough mind, his manners, his compassion. He protected that reputation at any cost.”

 



Honor Guard Strikes the Colors to a Drum Roll. Photo, WPCNR News.




Earning respect by example. Quelling rebellion with a few words.

Washington inspired by example. He lived with his troops. He shared hardships with them, and so much was there respect for him that he was able to talk them out of armed rebellion at the end of the American Revolution. Washington had been asked by the army to join them to over throw the Continental Congress, and make himself King.

Washington had been asked by one of the officers of the rebels to join them, and he wrote them,

You could not have found a person to whom your schemes are more disagreeable. Banish these thoughts from your mind.

Hearing that the rebels who were planning insurrection against the new country due to not having been paid by the Continental Congress, Washington rode to Newburgh, New York, on March 15, 1783, to meet with the dissident insurgents. Washington spoke to the rebellious group, saying,

“Gentlemen, as I was among the first who embarked in the cause of our common Country; as I never left your side one moment, but when called from you on public duty; as I have been the constant companion and witness of your Distresses…it can scarcely be supposed …that I am indifferent to your interests. But…this dreadful alternative, of either deserting our Country in the extremest hour of her distress, or turning our Arms against it…has something so shocking in it that humanity revolts from the idea…I spurn it, as every Man who regards liberty…undoubtedly must.”

The would-be rebels fell silent, digesting what he had said. Then Washington withdrew a letter from Congress, but could not read the text, withdrawing some eyeglasses from his tunic, remarking,

“Gentlemen, you will permit me to put on my spectacles for I have not only grown gray but almost blind in the service of my country.”

The men present were reported to have tears in their eyes at this gesture of Washington’s and abandoned their plot out of respect for their leader.

Washington retired from the military, surprising the entire new country. His action surprised King George III of England, who was astonished that Washington had refused to hold on to his military authority and use it for political or financial gain. The defeated King of England, remarked, “If true, then he is the greatest man in the world.”



Members of Common Council: Tom Roach, Rita Malmud, Benjamin Boykin and Glen Hockley, (center of Picture) and observers of the ceremony salute the Colors. Photo, WPCNR News.




Seeker of Diverse Views

As President, George Washington invented the Presidential Cabinet, whom he referred to as “the first Characters,” persons who possessed the best reputations in fields and areas of the jobs he was filling. Washington said on political appointments, “My political conduct and nominations must be exceedingly circumspect. No slip into partiality will pass unnoticed…”

Washington tolerated the relentless clashes between Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State, and Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of the Treasury, but lectured them on the necessity for tolerance and moving beyond partisanship: “I believe the view of both of you are pure, and well meant. Why then, when some of the best Citizens in the United States, Men…who have no sinister view to promote, are to be found, some on one side, some on the other…should either of you be so tenacious of your opinions as to make no allowances for those of the other? I have great esteem for you both, and ardently wish that some line could be marked out by which both of you could walk.”

The Constitution Should be Protected

When George Washington left office after two terms, he made a farewell address which warned future generations of Americans about foreign entanglements and partisanship in the republic:

I shall carry to my grave the hope that your Union and brotherly affection may be perpetual; that the Constitution may be sacredly maintained; and that free government…the ever favorite object of my heart…will be the happy reward of our mutual cares, labors and dangers.”

Washington died in 1800, three years after leaving office in 1797. He was saluted on the floor of congress as being “First in war, first in peace, first in the hearts of his countrymen.”



The Jacob Purdy House where George Washington planned strategy at  the Battle of White    Plains, was scene of a gathering in honor of President Washington Sunday, hosted by the White Plains Historical Society. Photo, WPCNR News.




Note: The American President By Philip B. Kunhardt, Jr., Philip B. Kunhardt III, and Peter W. Kunhardt (Riverhead Books. Penguin-Putnam, Inc.,1999) is the source for this information on George Washington.


This article originally appeared in The CitizeNetReporter in 2003.

Posted in Uncategorized

Putting People Last.

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE DAILY BAILEY. News & Comment By John F. Bailey. July 4, 2007: The Spano Administration is fond of mouthing the phrase, Government that works for Westchester Families, and the city of White Plains Democrats praddle about “Putting People First.”


Well, we learned yesterday,  those slogans don’t apply to you if you’re homeless, scruffy, proud and sick and don’t have money.


Yesterday, we learned that if you’re homeless, you’re someone to be used to score political points.


Kindly old Uncle Andy Spano decided, based on what great humanitarian’s advice, to close the 85 Court Street Drop-In Shelter in White Plains which he opened in January 2006 without telling White Plains because he for some strange reason had to close the shelter at the airport. He also as of this writing has not told the Mayor’s Office officially that he’s closing 85 Court.


In retrospect, now that Andy has a very safe and secure airport after blowing through $5 Million for the fence system,( just ask the coyotes), isn’t it time to ship the homeless back to the airport, perhaps have them sleep in the WestAir lounge….giving them identification passes? After all, what safer place could there be? Uncle Andy never did explain why he closed the airport drop-in shelter in the first place, and now that’s so safe, he can issue them i.d.’s to get them in and out…and keep track of them.


But, this closing the shelter and not running busses to move the homeless to other drop-in shelters around the county is a really bad thing. It reverses about 14 years of history. The county has traditionally run buses to drop in shelters ever since a poor person froze to death shocking the truly concerned, if memory served me right 14 years ago.


Now we’re just going to let these people roam around White Plains all night – in 90 degree humidity; in thunderstorms; In 25 degree days in September and October (they do happen) – and let them urinate, defecate, drink and sleep in the streets and alleys and doorways?  Talk about your quality of life issues!


And where are they going to bathe? In the Renaissance Fountain? That’ll look really good.


And how come the genius editor at the Journal News misses this part of the story: White Plains swarming with these poor psychotic people, many needing medication, begging – there but for the grace of the taxpayer go you – our elected officials.


So the Democrats put people first? What crap! The Democratic Councilpersons have not reached out to White Plains organizations to find places to house the homeless now that their peerless leader, Uncle Andy has decided to close the shelter? What happened? Did the Volunteers of America contract run out? (Volunteers of America drives the buses that will pick up the homeless until August 5, then they fade off into the night, and the homeless will rack out at The Galleria, the Fountain, park benches, the White Plains mall and beg.


More to the point. Where are the housing coalition organizations that suck away government money and advocate for the homeless while drawing salaries? Could they step up here? For the truly needy?


And how about the churches of White Plains?


Ask yourself what Jesus would do?


If every church in White Plains took on one or two homeless persons to stay in their sanctuary, clean it, do a little work for a place to sleep, as an experiment, how great would that be? Don’t count on it.  The churches pride themselves on their compassion. But unless you pay them $600,000 worth of compassion a year in county money, a year to do it, they don’t want to do it. Taking care of the homeless is business.


Well, that attitude should change. Making money off the homeless, the handicapped, the affordable housing issue is what is wrong with government.


Closing the shelter is Uncle Andy playing politics and using the down and out as a political football.


The city is equally to blame.


This reporter suggested to the Mayor’s office months ago,  that they be proactive in attempting to find a place to house the homeless away from the downtown, since the county wasn’t doing it, and the Democrats on the Council weren’t doing it.  The Mayor’s office was shortsighted, they said it does not belong in White Plains and the county and other cities and towns should consider the problem.


The Mayor’s office just pounded out the rhetoric: we have to relocate the shelter, not close it, and they used the excuse that White Plains already has three shelters: Open Arms, the Coachman and the Grace Church operation.


Well, I am sorry, Mr. Mayor: how about twisting the arms of the churches and synagogues of White Plains?  Ask them to take two at once. That would show some thought. How about housing the homeless in a gym at the Middle Schools or the high school? Or one of the private schools – or how about the St. John’s Church school on Main Street that is now closed?


Again, nobody cares about the homeless at the political level. The homeless are just used to throw an issue out.


Politicians only care about themselves and their pathetic posturing to make their perceived political enemies look bad.


It is despicable closing that shelter. And not busing them someplace to sleep.


And do not forget, this reporter was the only reporter to tell you what it is like to be homeless at the 85 Court Street Drop-In shelter. You have to wait an hour for your bus to be taken two blocks to the shelter. You cannot get to sleep before midnight. You sleep on paper sheets. No showers. Two bathrooms for 40 people, if I recall correctly. They are lucky they had no serious incidents. You put the average commuter railway car full of people in that situation and you’d have a riot. I have great respect for those people who put up with the county’s idea of humanity. They have great quiet dignity. They get treated like cattle and stoically accept it.


Equally despicable is the Council of Governments – all those compassionate community officials whom  Uncle Andy could not persuade to agree on at least two places to put the hardcore homeless. Not one community stepped up to attack the homeless problem by saying “we’ll take them Andy. They’re people.”  What leaders! How pathetic. How revealing. How bereft!


What a leader Uncle Andy is: he has all this power but no clout. And no guts.


Everybody is afraid of him and his inept, overpaid flacks. I tell you, if I’m the County Executive, I tell Valhalla, a year ago, look it’s going there and you can sue us, but do not expect anything from the county.


If I’m the County Executive, I do not make the Mayor of White Plains look bad by closing a shelter. I make him look bad by personally going on a walking tour with various citizens in White Plains and lining up shelters in White Plains. That’s leadership. (The Mayor could have done that. Councilpersons Malmud, Boykin, Roach, Berstein, Hockley and Power – the great homeless advocate—could have done that, too. But they did not. Have not. Will they now? Or do I see a setup coming on?)


Where is County Legislator Ryan on this homeless issue?


Like every leader, he is missing in action, and on most issues, Mr. Ryan is waiting to see which way to jump. He said he would be willing to work with Mayor Delfino to solve this, calling the Mayor’s bluff. The Mayor did not call Ryan’s bluff. And so nothing has been done.


Ryan never returned our call on this issue. He so badly wants Uncle Andy’s do nothing, spend as much as we can job – he is afraid to speak out against the ludicrous spectacle of winos and druggies and psychotics, and genuinely needy people lounging in the parking garages of White Plains, the Renaissance Fountain, and begging at the Ritz-Carlton – that will play really well. And it is his County Executive who has decided to create this scenario.


Get some new advisors, Andy, they’re killing you, kid. Absolutely killing you.


But wait – here’s another suggestion. Let’s bus the homeless to Indian Point. That is very secure. You can even blow a siren if one homeless person leaves. Are they working, Andy? It is so wonderful your administration is so good at siren testing, and detecting finite traces of radioactive substances.


Man, it is time to call the Journal News and tell them to crank out some Indian Point exposes again. We have not had one in at least two days. Quick get me the Editorial Board of America’s worst newspaper.


Oh – another place to put the homeless – the White Plains Performing Arts Center. Since there’s nothing performing there lately – or for sometime. Perhaps we could start a Homeless Theatre Troup…with an original play or musical, you could call it “Homeless Blues.”


Or is this just another setup? Will Uncle Andy in a week announce he has made an arrangement with some place to bus the White Plains irregulars someplace?


I hope so.


The county says they are going to work very hard at getting the homeless who enjoy the 85 Court Street amenities to agree to seek help in the county Department of Social Services system.


Does this mean they have not been having councilors come in daily to help these people and win their confidence?


I mean the county just hired a ton of new DSS employees. Let’s put them to work. Now.


Put people first for change.


Government puts people last, but your wallets first.

Posted in Uncategorized

Eliot Spitzer’s Albany: Tell Your Legislator to Finish the People’s Business

Hits: 0


WPCNR ELIOT SPITZER’S ALBANY. By Governor Eliot T. Spitzer. July 3, 2007: I came to Albany in January with an aggressive agenda to enact the reform our state sorely needs.


When I was elected, many doubted that I would be able to change the status quo enough to put into effect my administration’s ambitious plans. It hasn’t been easy, but we have achieved significant success.


Over the past six months, we have managed to push through substantial gridlock in the state legislature to make some huge advancements for New York:



 




In addition to making a historic investment of $1.7 billion in education, we have targeted assistance to the districts that need it most, and tied investment to accountability and reform.


We created the first building blocks to universal health care by expanding Child Health Plus to cover all 400,000 uninsured children, and vastly simplified Medicaid enrollment.


Property taxes have been reduced by $1.3 billion, and 60% of New Yorkers will see benefits within the next year.


Our beleaguered upstate cities will receive $200 million for economic development, technology innovations, and assistance in fighting crime. Major downstate projects- like the redevelopment of Ground Zero and the expansion of Stewart Airport- have been pushed through legislative gridlock and are finally underway.


Lawmakers and government employees are now subject to comprehensive Ethics and Lobbying Reform that prohibits them from taking gifts from special interests and makes them accountable to the people of New York State.



A lot has been accomplished, but there is still so much to be done- from major environmental initiatives like cleaning up brownfields, to the revamp of the Wicks Law, to campaign finance reform measures that make our government more responsive- and it must be done now.


Last week, the Senate majority chose to end the legislative session and go home, rather than stay in Albany to finish the people’s business.


Our state government must work as effectively and diligently as the companies, organizations and people that make New York great.


You can learn more about what’s been going on in Albany by clicking here to view a presentation I’ve been making across the state.


I urge you to contact your legislator, which you can do from my website, and encourage him or her to return to work in Albany, and finish the business we came here to do.

Posted in Uncategorized

Hardcore Homeless On Their Own in WP After August 5. Drop-In Dropped.

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE HOMELESS NEWS.  By John F. Bailey July 3, 2007. Updated  3:40 P.M. EDT:  The “homeless buses” will no longer sweep the homeless off city streets nightly courtesy of Westchester County as of August 5. 


They will be left to wander the streets nightly.  


According to county spokesperson Victoria Hochman, the County is closing the 85 Court Street Drop-in shelter. Ms. Hochman corrected WPCNR that she did not say the homeless would be left to wander the streets, however Ms. Hochman did say there would be no more bus service for the homeless with no place to go after August 5, which in effect, leaves those homeless to wander the streets. WPCNR apologizes for indicating in any way Ms. Hochman said the county would leave the homeless to walk the streets all night.


 By this action, the county abandons its 18-month policy of providing homeless persons not enrolled in the Department of Social Services system, shelter and a bed to sleep — instead of an alley, a doorway, a parking garage, the fountain,  a sidewalk grate.


As of August 5, the homeless population of some 50 or more men will be left on their own at the mercy of oppressive heat, thunderstorms, rain, early frost.


The county has granted White Plains what the Common Council and the Mayor have asked for, according to county spokesperson, Victoria Hochman, that the 85 Court Street will be closed, as of August 5The spokesperson could not confirm if the county had officially notified the city of its closing yesterday or this morning. The Mayor’s Executive Officer, Paul Wood told WPCNR he had learned of the possibility of its closing from a reporter. As of 10:45 A.M. this morning, Wood said the county had still not officially notified the city of the closing.


Wood also said Ms. Hochman and the Department of Communications of the County are “incorrect,” reading from the resolution passed by the Common Council which called on the county “to relocate” the drop-in shelter from White Plains, not to close it.  Wood said, Rita Malmud, the Council President, misinterpreted the resolution in previous comments to the media.



First Ride: Homeless Are Picked Up to go to 85 Court Street, January 2006. The nightly “Homeless Sweep” will end August 5 when the Drop In Shelter at 85 Court (below) closes. Photos, WPCNR News Archive


 


 


Hochman confirmed  the homeless will be provided shelter at other shelters in  White Plains with arrangements with the county after November 1.  Though those shelters in White Plains are at capacity in terms of beds. They include the Coachman, Open Arms and the Grace Church facility. Whether you could provide space or standing or sitting room for the 43 to 50 persons who visit 85 Court Street in the cold months has yet to be seen.


Hochman told WPCNR but said county workers would urge “regulars” at 85 Court Street to agree to enter the county system, and  stated unequivocably that there would be no drop-in shelter service at all in the county..


Paul Wood, City Executive Officer, called WPCNR at 6:15 PM last night to say he was stunned to learn from a reporter that the county was closing the shelter. Wood said it was the first he had heard of it.  Chairman of the Board of Legislators Bill Ryan of White Plains was contacted by WPCNR to confirm the story, but did not return a WPCNR call to confirm the report.  Wood told WPCNR the city had only asked the county to relocate the shelter because of its proximity to the downtown.  


Hardcore Homeless Back on the Streets Permanently as of August 5.


The secret decision to close the shelter without official notice reverses the county policy that precipitated the opening of the shelter at 85 Court in January 2006. The county had said at the time that 85 Court was to house homeless persons who refused to enter the county Department of Social Services system — so-called hardcore homeless — whereby they agree to a treatment program, turn over control of their income, and seek employment counseling among other requirements. 


 Now, unable to find any community that would house a shelter, the county appears by this decision to allow undocumented and untracked homeless to wander about White Plains nightly after August 5. They will not be able to enter shelters elsewhere in White Plains until November, and will be left to their own devices overnight.


Hochman said the Council of Governments convened by County Executive Andrew Spano to address the Drop-In situation, had been unable to find or suggest another location in the county for a Drop-In Shelter. “No one stepped up,” Hochman said.


Politicians Ignore Issue


No other local White Plains politician worked to find a solution  to where the drop-in shelter could go to in White Plains.  County Legisltor William Ryan of White Plains had said he would reach out  to work with Mayor Delfino to find a site, but neither politician reached out to each other to attempt a resolution jointly. No Common Council person from White Plains stepped forward on the issue to seek other sites within White Plains either.


Wood said he had no plans at this time for handling the fifty or more vagrants expected to be wandering the White Plains streets nightly, let alone the question of who they are:  “We’ll have to work with the police, I guess,” Wood said, saying the homeless will gravitate to the fountain in the warmer nights, which he felt would be an issue.

Posted in Uncategorized

City Owed $316 Million on DUMP. DEC Cuts It to $10 Gs. Investigation Continues

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR THE DUMP TODAY. By John F. Bailey. July 2, 2007: For allowing TEC contamination to linger in the City Dump for 9 years as of this Friday, the City of White Plains was in line for a civil penalty of $316 Million payable to the state.  However, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation allowed the city to sign a consent order June 8 limiting the fine to $10,000.



THE CITY DUMP TODAY: A flatter, cleaner place. Who Knows What Lurks Beneath its benign surface? DEC will be supervising the city’s efforts to quanitify the TEC contamination that exists. Remediation is called for in the Consent Order, but that has not been decided.


In the coming weeks, according to Department of Public Works Commissioner, Joseph Nicoletti, the city will be meeting with the DEC to implement the final testing specifications on the City Dump Site, to be conducted to prepare a Final Investigation Report that, according to Wendy Rosenbach, Regional Citizen Participation Specialist for the DEC, is due to be submitted December 1. At that time, determination will be made if the extent of the contamination needs remediation or is safe to allow to remain. The Consent Order by its language strongly suggests the DEC expects some sort of remediation to be required.



Commissioner Nicoletti, expressed optimism Friday that the contamination he is seeing is “better than I expected,” but he said he awaits the first testing reports available soon.


City Site Investigation Work Plan Not Acceptable


The city plan for testing the present level of the Trichloroethylene(TCEz)  contamination first discovered officially  July 6, 1998 according to the consent order, was not acceptable to the DEC. As part of the consent order, the DEC testing expert analyzing the city Department of Public Works plan designed by AKRF Environmental  and Planning Consultants, added “modifications and additions as required.”


The DEC expert, S. Parisio,  said the city’s Site Investigation Work Plan “should be broadened and expanded to include…characterize the landfill, including type of wastes, spatial distribution of the various waste types, and vertical and horizontal limits of the landfill,” “Define the extent of groundwater contamination both laterally and vertically,” “Define the critical stratigraphic section at the site including the overburden and the underlying bedrock,” “Identify all potential receptors for landfill derived contamination including surface water bodies, water supply wells and enclosed structures which may be impacted by landfill gas or vapor intrusion,” “Develop a site conceptual model which identifies contaminant sources within the landfill, locations and mechanisms for contaminant release and actual/potential contamination and migration pathways…” “This model should also show how storm water drains affect migration of landfill gas, organic vapors, landfill leachate and leachate impacted groundwater…”


The Consent Order notes  the city drilling plan was “not acceptable,” because it limited drilling depth to the “overburden.” The DEC demands the city drill deeper. IT requests various “plan sheets”


Remediation Appears Likely


The language of the consent order signed by the Mayor, read literally, indicates the city is going to have to remediate the dump, to wit:


“After completion of the site investigation, the Respondent shall submit a site investigation report (SIR) including a description of the investigation methods, a summary of the data collected, a discussion of the results, conclusions and recommendations for further investigation , if needed, remedial action and landfill closure.”


The Violation and Fine.


On July 6, 1998, the Consent Order notes, inspection of the site by Department staff revealed the presence of drums of trichloroethylene. During subsequent investigations and removal activities carried out by the city in 1999 and 2000, a total of 46 drums were indentified and removed, and the presence of organic contaminants, including trichloroethylene, was confirmed in the drums and in soils within the drum disposal areas. The order reports TCE breakdown products have been “detected” at concentrations exceeding applicable levels of concern in stormwater, surface water, groundwater, soil and soil gas during numerous investigations and sampling efforts carried out in and around the landfill by various consultants between 1987 and 2003.


These conditions which the city has admitted to by signing the consent order June 8, violate Environmental Conservation Law Sections 27 and 17 and 6NYCRR Parts 360 and 703 and 5 statutes.


$316 Million ?


Neither Ms. Rosenback nor Paul Wood, City Executive Officer could name the exact total amount of the possible civil fine White Plains has incurred as a result of the 9 years since the violation was discovered.


WPCNR roughly estimates the fine to be $316 Million as follows:


From July 6, 1998, the date of the verified condition, 2,385 days have passed (about 9 years as of this Friday)


Under the fine mechanism of Section 71-2703, there were five statutes violated, calling for a $7,500 fine per statute,($37,500) plus $1,500 a day for 2,385 days for $3,577,500 for each of the 5 statutes violated for a total of $17,887,500 plus the initial $37,500 fine for a total of $17,925,000 for city violation of Section 71 2703.


Now we add the violations of Section 71-1929. There were 5 statutes violated at the cost of $25,000 a day per statute adding up to a $125,000 a day fine in total multiplied by 2,385 days totals $298,125,000.


Add the two violations and the Civil Penalty owed the DEC is $316,050,000.


Fine would have been double the City Budget


That fine is more than double the city of White Plains budget for 2007-2008 ($154.7 Million), and in order to pay it – had the DEC not cut White Plains a $316,040,000 discount – would cost every White Plains taxpayer twice the taxes they are paying now, and probably 4 times the amount of taxes unless the assessed the shortfall on the businesses in the town.   


WPCNR  awaits comfirmation of the exact amount of the total possible fine, which is not mentioned in the consent order.


All the city is required to pay is $2,000, leaving the $8,000  as possible to be paid and then some if the city does not comply with the rest of the Consent Order.


Rosenbach told WPCNR Friday the city has made adjustments to the Site Investigation Plan: “Yes, the work plan has been revised to address Department comments and much of the work indentified in the plan has been completed.”


Asked why the city received leniency from the DEC, Wood said he did not have an answer and would get back to us on that.


Ms. Rosenback of the DEC said she would be asking the DEC negotiators for a statement on the lowered fine.

Posted in Uncategorized

Second Post Road Violent Incident in a Week Saturday Morning.

Hits: 0

WPCNR POLICE GAZETTE. July 2, 2007: There was a second violent incident  within a week involving a dispute between two men on Post Road behind a bar on East Post Road in the wee hours of Saturday morning, White Plains Police reported this morning.


According to Deputy Commissioner Daniel Jackson in a statement to WPCNR, The department arrested Ricardo Santana of West Post Road for a slashing that occurred early Saturday morning behind Los Amigos bar at 98 E. Post Rd. The dispute originated in the bar.



The victim received treatment at White Plains Hospital and was released.



Santana is charged with Assault 1st Deg. and Criminal Possession of a Weapon. He is currently at the Westchester County Jail.

Posted in Uncategorized

Photograph of the Day

Hits: 0

WPCNR PHOTOGRAPH OF THE DAY. By the WPCNR Roving Photographer. July 2, 2007: The changing face of the Westchester County skyline is captured by this view from Long Island Sound of the Trump building in New Rochelle, looking like the fabled Ancient Wonder of the World, the Lighthouse at  Phobos in Alexandria, Egypt. Like the Trump Tower, the lighthouse at Phobos built in similar stepped plateaued style was  visible for miles in the eastern Mediteranean Sea, a guide for ancient mariners. The Trump, Louis Cappelli building dominates the shoreline yesterday on a perfect day on the inland sea, Long Island Sound.



Trump Tower, right, dominating the New Rochelle skyline. Viewed from the entrance to New Rochelle Harbor, Long Island Sound. Photo by the WPCNR Roving Photographer


 


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

City and School Tax Bill Works Out to 8% Hike — not 7% as Advertised.

Hits: 0

WPCNR QUILL & EYESHADE. July 1, 2007: The City of White Plains has sent out its bills to the legal residents of White Plains this weekend, and if you do the math, the much ballyhooed 7% tax increase vowed by the City School District and the City Council is not 7% it is 8% with county taxes and sewer district taxes to come.


If you take out your calculators and do the math, on a $700,000 home you’re paying $712 more than you paid last year which works out to — surprise! — 8%. If your home is swanker you’re paying upwards of a thousand dollars more in taxes, and City and School Taxes will be destined to top the $10,000 mark next year on residences selling above $600,000.


The City of White Plains Statement of Taxes for Fiscal Year 2008 indicates  the tax on a $700,000 home is up 7% and the school tax on the same home is up 8.3%.


The city reports this there is  a 4.75% increase in the city tax levy ($41,145,849 on a $154.7 Million Budget) and a 10.1% increase in the city school tax levy of $118,290.992 (on a $174.1 Million School Budget). The tax is even greater if you are not eligible for  a STAR reduction.


Another factoid about city and school taxes is that in last year’s tax bill the City Tax Levy increased 5.62%, while the School Tax levy was up 5.49%. This the School budget levy increases 10.1% according to the city’s official notice while the city levy decreased.


Now, WPCNR awaits the instructions from New York State on how to apply for the extra STAR Rebate promised this spring. Be watching the mail folks, you would not want to miss it. Remember guys?


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

America’s Bad Week

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR THE SUNDAY BAILEY. By John F. Bailey. July 1, 2007:


 The damage has been done.


The Bush-loaded Supreme Court has declared it’s not ok to discriminate in terms of race, if you’re already discriminating by race opting for a don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t even think about it policy in determining racial balance in schools by their sophist decision to strike down the Brown vs. Board of Education decision. That decision in 1954 can be argued was the primary reason why segregation practices in all fields were vastly curtailed and remediated in the country painfully through the courts through lynchings over the last 53 years. Now the Supreme Court is bringing discrimination right back.



 


Well the court says that that decision was discriminatory because it discriminated. These guys went to law school?!?  Look at this statement by Chief Justice John Roberts: and let it sink in:


“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”


What judicial brilliance! Obviously Chief Justice Roberts does not wear his robes “to right wrongs,” as Judge Francis Nicolai of the 9th Judicial District here in Westchester does. He wears them to do other people’s bidding. Roberts and the “Favored Five” do not come to grips with the question of how do you stop wrong? Without the force of law, you would never have desegregated the schools in the 50s and 60s, and even with the law you needed the military to do it.


But the Bush Court is no longer the people’s court, it is the Bush Court. They do what they are told. And they followed orders very nicely.


Does anyone really think that Hispanic and Asian and Black persons were going to be chosen over white candidates in businesses in the 60s if there was no Equal Opportunity Law? Businesses were afraid of it. They started hiring the token blacks.


I remember it well what it was like for a token black hired.  I was starting out in television in 1968 at WMAL  TV in Washington DC. They hired a young black reporter, to add to their all-white news staff. They sent Bernie out on auto accidents to do standups. To my everlasting shame, I was editing film at the time, and would complain about his lack of cutaways, (which are stationary views shot by the cameraman to bridge from one interview to another instead of jump-cutting). Well, I know now that they never trained him. They threw him in there. He did not know.


So what happens when Dr. Martin Luther King is shot? All Washington erupts into riots. Well the white reporters are all afraid to go below 16th street. So what do they do they send Bernie in. He works like 24 hours straight. He does articulate, dramatic, intense standups and radio reports. He does Pulitzer work. He was brave. When the riots end. He goes back to doing accidents. He left the station and I often wonder where he went. He had done the best local reporting on the riots and all he got was photo ops afterwards. He knew.


  I think of him often when I hear people say as the apologists for the Bush administration say we are beyond that now because businesses, schools, do not need quotas on admissions, hirings, etc. Are we really? We are going to find out!


No, we are not. You saw it this week from the mouths and pens of Justice John Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (incredibly a Black man) and Alito.


The worst scorn I reserve for Justice Kennedy, he put in reservations in his opinion, leaving some loopholes. Hey, that does not do it. Vote it down! When Justice Kennedy is on his death bed, he will be thinking of this decision.


 Don’t mask a dirty deed by semantics. Vote it down. No Justice Kenesaw Mountain Landis, he.


Where is all that equal opportunity legislation headed after this Brown/Board of Education outrage by the Supreme Court? Where does No Child Left Behind stand now? If that is not discriminating I do not know what is…it is very easy to apply discrimination by race to discrimination by test scores. The Supreme Court is using an argument to win an argument…what is known philosophically as sophism — or a lack of rational argument.


How does one achieve performance improvement in minorities  in the schools now – by grades, by test scores? That should be interesting. How about lumping all the students who do not pass the absurdly curved New York State Math and English Language Achievement tests into special schools to really work on them? You could conceivably do that, using the argument that we’re not discriminating by race here…we’re using their test scores. Mr. Roberts and the “Favored Five” are living in the world of privilege where they actually believe they are good people and good people won’t discriminate because of the honor system.


If I am a crafty education lawyer I could apply this Supreme Court decision to school testing. And throw that out too on the basis it is discriminating based on performance.


The honor system does not work, guys…especially, in the judiciary.


But that’s not all the Supereme Court did. They O.K.’d oligopoly – restricted for a century, by an overturning  stranglehold pricing  restrictions of anti-trust legislation on the books for 100 years.


They struck down a 100 year old classic. They eviscerated the law prohibiting manufacturers from agreeing on minimum retail prices. The justices ruled that by striking down this law, it would lead to more competition and service. Right!  The decision helps manufacturers combat discounters, knockoff artists, etc.  How does that help competition?  The law they killed was a law that defined resale price maintenance agreements (manufacturer to wholesaler) as “automatic” violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Judges now have to  take a case-by-case approach.


 So if you’re a wholesaler and retailer,  unless you have deep legal pockets to fight a price rise, you are in for long legal fights. How is this constructive? We already see how the oil market fixes prices don’t we? Now the Supreme Court says every manufacturer can do it, and you have to prove they are being unfair on a case by case basis.


You need only look no further to see how prejudiced America still is at the American Senate.


By the Immigration Bill defeat, when Republican and Democratic Senators in congress voted against it said, well people back home are so against this. Well back in Revolutionary America, there were colonists who opposed the colonies rebellion against England. It would have been easy to listen to them. But an extraordinary number of persons gave up their lives (with no helicopters to take them to a state-of-the-art field hospital) because they realized tyranny was not what they could live with. Where are leaders like that today?


First equality, then fairness, then truth


These events were topped by the latest assessment of the Iraqi War effort.


 


The commander in Baghdad said the American casualty count last week, largest weekly death toll in the war,  showed we were winning the war to control Baghdad. He said the Queda cells were bloodthirsty and that was why since we are going after them more aggressively house-to-house, our casualty count was up which he interpreted as good and a sign we are winning.


So when we watch the fireworks tomorrow night in White Plains we have to think a little harder about our role in combating those who promote the good of the few at the expense of the many; the preservation of the status quo; the exploitation of the weak; the patronization of a person without privileges.


Read the Constitution on July 4 and really think hard about it.


The Bush Administration and the infamous Bush Court has just begun to take back America for the morally superior, the politically connected, the competently-inept, the fixers and the looters.


It is not what you say, it is what you do.


This was a bad week for America.

Posted in Uncategorized

Pollitzer Pulls Out of Common Council November Race

Hits: 0

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2007. From White Plains Independent (Edited). July 1, 2007: In a news release sent to reporters Friday, White Plains Independent has announced that Marc Pollitzer has withdrawn from their bid for the Common Council. Pollitzer will continue in a role as Campaign Chair, the release said.



Activist Council Candidate Withdraws. Marc Pollitzer it was announced will not seek a seat on the Common Council in November. His former running mates, Robert Levine and Robert Stackpole will continue their campaign for the Council.


Robert J. Stackpole  and  Robert H. Levine have initiated their run for  Common Council as White Plains Independent (WPI) candidates, it was announced.

“ The purpose of our candidacy,” Mr. Stackpole stated, “is to insure that there will be a consistent, forceful, five-vote Council  majority––missing thus far–– that will reflect the grassroots interests of the people of White Plains.”

“ Too much is being lost,” Mr. Levine added, “as we see developers, rather than our city leaders, increasingly shaping the future of White Plains. The time has come to put a stop to the privatization of planning for our community. The time has come to take our city back.”

Marc Pollitzer will chair the WPI election effort, having chosen to withdraw his candidacy, citing the time demands of his business in NYC.


Posted in Uncategorized