Tolchin: County Budget To Be Released November 14– Cuts Considered.

Hits: 0

WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. From the Westchester County Department of Communications. September 18, 2008: WPCNR contacted Susan Tolchin Chief Advisor to Westchester County Executive Andrew Spano Thursday, asking the latest trends in County Mortgage Tax Collections (down 33% in July), and Sales Tax Collections (off about 3% about a month ago), and how they might affect the $1.8 Billion county budget.


Ms. Tolchin has issued this statement to WPCNR Thursday:


Budget revenues are brought to the Board of Legislators every quarter. The third quarter forecast will not be ready until we get September figures. I can answer your questions on revenues when the forecast is completed.


Concerning the budget cuts, we are well aware of these tough economic times and all budgets have been and are still being reviewed for cuts and money saving intiatives. Every aspect of the county budget is being looked at. It is a process that has been going on for some time, not just because of the latest Wall Street news. The budget will be released on November 14th.

Posted in Uncategorized

NYISO-FERC Failure to Stop Overcharges Fast Cost Mr./Mrs. NY Mystery Millions

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. By John F. Bailey. September 18, 2008 UPDATED 1 P.M. EDT: The Executive Director of the New York Municipal Power Agency representing 36 small-to-medium munipalities in the state told WPCNR Thursday that his Agency calculation of $100 Million (estimated by NYISO as $400 Million to power suppliers statewide, passed on directly to residential and commercial users) represented only one month’s overcharges directly related to the long-way—around Lake Erie electrical contracts. He said the NYISO figure of $400 Million was also only one month’s overcharges generated, in part, by the Lake Erie “roundabout” contracts.


The revelation raises the possibility, as yet uncommented upon by NYISO and FERC, that consumers paid $800 Million our untold millions more, pending on the loads of electricity and kilowatt hour charges they paid over the 8 Months plus  the Lake Erie option was available.  



The practice of electrical contractors of routing electric power contracts by delivery counter-clockwise around the Lake, Robert Mullane, Executive Director of the New York Municipal Power Agency, first started to be noticed by the cities in his organization in December, 2007. In May, 2008,  the only month his  36 member-cities have figures, the overcharges amounted to $100 Million. Mullane does not know what the NYISO overcharges were for June, July. 


Multiplication of the NYISO  calculation for the entire state of overcharges for  May of $400 Million, (a hot month), before the high energy demand months of June, July and August gives  total overcharges for the state over 8 months of  roughly $3.2  Billion – but the real figure is not known Mullane said.  


“Only NYISO has the figures,” Mullane told WPCNR Thursday. Mullane said NYISO has ballparked the statewide loss at $400 Million (for one month).


Mullane comfirmed what Con Edison told WPCNR Wednesday that overcharges, possibly stemming substantially from the Lake Erie “roundabout” contracts, had declined substantially.


Mullane said his organization was unaware the Lake Erie routing had been used in the past (2003), as reported by DC Energy to WPCNR Wednesday.   That routing maneuver resulted in overcharges to the Pennsylvania and New Jersey markets.  Mullane said he would have his legal staff look into that.


Schumer Mum. Quotes NYISO Documents in Press Release.


Meanwhile, Senator Charles Schumer’s office has not released any information on Senator Schumer’s meeting with Joseph Kelliher, the Chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Wednesday morning, despite repeated questions from WPCNR for preliminary statements as where the Senator’s call for an “open and public investigation” is going.


A Schumer Office press release is being prepared WPCNR was told late Wednesday afternoon and is still unreleased as of high noon Thursday.


Schumer’s press office said Wednesday that the Senator became aware of it based on his research staff which discovered documents in releases from the agencies revealing the overcharges. Senator Schumer’s press release (released August 12 and again last Thursday), quotes directly from the NYISO documents forwared to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission July 21. It would appear that the Senator was unaware of the practice before his researchers became aware of the NYISO July 21 documents, but that is unconfirmed at this time.


Who the Traders Were A Mystery.


The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission declined to release the number of traders involved in the process, the dollar amount dimension of the practice which took place from December to July 2008. Coincidently, Consolidated Edison’s kilowatt hour charge to White Plains residents alone escalated 65% over those 9 months.


Asked if he had any idea why NYISO did not immediately suspend Lake Erie routing maneuver when it was first pointed out to them by NYISO, pending investigation, and holding back the overcharges caused by the rerouting around Lake Erie, until NYISO determined whether or not the charges were legal, Mullane said, “That’s a good question.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Con Ed: Overcharges Westchester/WP Paid in Lake Erie Deals Unknown

Hits: 0


 


WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. By John F. Bailey September 17, 2008 Exclusive Interview with Con Edison: Consolidated Edison told WPCNR Tuesday afternoon they cannot calculate the amount of overcharges Westchester and White Plains electricity customers paid as a result of the Lake Erie electricity routing contracts.


 


Consolidated Edison, the utility which put  the pressure on the New York Independent Systems Operator to investigate and discover the Lake Erie Bypass Caper by which millions,(perhaps billions) of dollars in passalong costs were laid onto the bills of electric consumers resident and corporate in the first seven months of this year  told WPCNR Tuesday it could not calculate the approximate dollars added to the bills of Westchester consumers


 


Meanwhile in the eight weeks since NYISO stopped the procedure, Con Edison reports significant drops in overcharges of Westchester electricity users.


 


 


 



 


The New York Independent Systems Operator stopped the practice July 22, based on an investigation encouraged by Con Edison last spring, which had been alerted to the Lake Erie Bypass “maneuver” by DC Energy, a energy broker based in Vienna, Virginia.


 


67% Increase since November, 2007


 


 The bill of the typical White Plains consumer increased 67% from November 2007 through August 2008. Previously, these costs were explained by Con Edison to be related to the increase in fuel costs of oil, natural gas and coal used to manufacture the electricity. However based on letters from the New York Municipal Power Agency  to NYISO,  NYISO budget overruns of 90% charged 36 small municipalities have been made up of NYISO additional charges based on Uplift costs (during congested times) and budget shortfalls caused by discounts granted an undisclosed number of  energy market traders.


 


Con Edison is not ruling out a legal suit against the companies whose actions produced these cost overruns which were passed on to Con Edison consumers.


 


Schumer Investigates as we Write


 


As this article is published, New York Senator Charles Schumer is meeting with Federal Energy Regulatory Commissioner Joseph Kelliher in Washington to assure an open investigation, and hopefully more information on the scope of what the Senator has called “a sham routing scheme” by what he called “rogue traders.”


 


FERC is currently conducting a non-public investigation into the matter, and has declined to name the traders who used the Lake Erie finesse,or dollar amounts of the overcharges. The Lake Erie counter-clockwise circulation, designed to ease congestion on the grid,  gave a $20 windfall per Megawatt hour by filing contracts circulating electricity counterclockwise around Lake Erie, instead of clockwise down its eastern shore and directly into the New York Power Grid. However the electricity action did go clockwise resulting in uplift charges to users of the power, including Con Edison and members of the New York Municipal Power Authority.


 


WPCNR interviewed Bob McGee with  Consolidated Edison  Media Relations, by e-mail on what Con Edison knows:


 


WPCNR: Does Con Edison and host of other power suppliers anticipate class action legal suit against the companies that perpetuated this practice — in light of the NYISO findings? 


 


Bob McGee, Con Edison: Actions will depend upon the findings and FERC actions.


 


 WPCNR:  How many  Market participants put electricity on the grid ?


McGee:  In the eastern quarter of the country, there are primarily 4 ISO/RTOs – ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO and Ontario.  There are several hundred market participants in each.  Should check with the ISOs/RTOs for information about which actually transact and meet transactional requirements.   The NYISO list over 300 market participants at their website  http://www.nyiso.com/public/webdocs/services/customer_relations/customers/nyiso_approved_customers.pdf


 


WPCNR: Does Con Edison have an estimate of how much these charges (the $20 MGW difference–according to the NYISO and FERC papers — as well as the UPLIFT Charges and the additonal buys of power Con Ed had to make during crunch periods) –were passed on to Con Ed customers? The last six months? 


McGEE: No.  Only the NYISO has the information to calculate the total impact to consumers.  We are pressing them to do the analysis.


 


WPCNR: Any statewide  $$$ estimate of the counter-clockwise Lake Erie windfalls, the additional buys, the uplift charges? 


McGEE: No.  Again, only NYISO can calculate this.  It is not easy to do, as uplift charges can vary based on a variety of conditions, including the market price of fuels, demand levels, and other factors.  Only the NYISO has the information to separate the charges, and even it cannot do so easily.


 


WPNCR: . Is Con Edison calling for a congressional investigation of this practice and the NYISO market? 


McGee:  Con Edison is working with the other NYTOs, as all were impacted.  The NYTOs are asking for FERC to investigate and the NYISO to provide additional information.


(WPCNR notes that FERC is already conducting a so far secret investigation of the matter.)


 


WPCNR: What caused counter-clockwise circulation to be installed in the Lake Erie “circuit”? 


McGee:  Loop flows around Lake Erie are normal and expected in an integrated electric system. 


 


WPCNR: Has Con Edison seen any relief yet stemming from NYISO’s stopping of the procedure July 21? 


McGee: Yes.  It appears that uplift charges have been lowered, and that day ahead and real time transactional flows are in the same direction around Lake Erie.


 


WPCNR: Does Con Edison  agree with the New York Law Project that feel NYISO’s Tariffs on congestion “are unjust and unreasonable insofar as they do not prohibit gaming, profits from unreasonable rates and correction for clearing prices artificially high due to gaming” ? 


 


McGee: FERC has general anti-manipulation rules.  These rules may be sufficient.  We will continue to work with appropriate parties to determine if further NYISO tariff changes are warranted.

Posted in Uncategorized

FERC, NYISO Mum on Lake Erie Scam. Zaps NY Billions. Con Ed Whistle Blower

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. By John F. Bailey.  September 16, 2008: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission refused Monday to reveal to WPCNR the number of brokers who  engaged in selling contracts to their profit advantage, costing millions of New York electric customers overcharges that were charged back to them.


The brokers sold contracts routing electricity around Lake Erie at a  $20 MGH discount, when the electricity would automatically route directly into the New York Power Grid, resulting in Uplifts and production charges charged back to New York electric customers.  


The FERC spokesperson also declined comment on the scope of the practice. She would not say how many times each broker executed such discounted routings, the full dollar impact of the reroutings, the possible profits, and the estimated total cost to consumers, citing a non-public investigation ongoing. 


The New York Independent System Operator which oversees the New York electric spot market refused to reveal the information, either, nor how it was discovered. The reason, according to their press spokesperson Ken Klapp,   “it is in the hands of FERC.”


Senator Charles Schumer of New York perhaps will learn more when he meets with FERC Chair Joseph Kelliher Wednesday. The Senator’s office has scheduled a news conference Wednesday to discuss the issue.


Lake Erie Maneuver was Executed in Reverse on New Jersey, Pa in 2003


An energy trader familiar with the practice told WPCNR Tuesday this “game” had been worked before by energy traders in 2003, and is nothing new.  Andrew Stevens of DC Energy in Vienna, Virginia, whose study of the Lake Erie connection activities from July 2007 to June 2008 is referenced in the FERC documents issued on the Lake Erie case,  told WPCNR the Lake Erie connection was executed in reverse around Lake Erie through New York back to the Pennsylvania, New Jersey market resulting in increased charges to Jersey and Pennsylvania users.


Stevens said that he had no personal knowledge of how the Federal Regulatory Commission first noticed the practice early this past spring, saying he suspects it was the FRC’s market monitors


The actual overcharges  to New York customers resulting from this practice of the January- July Lake Erie connection are not known and range from $100 to  $300 Million, according to published reports, but may be substantially more.


A National Problem?


Stevens said  he has no evidence of similar market manipulation by routing electricity on a cost-advantageous route, by traders elsewhere in the country. He said he suspects such routing practices  for cost advantage, may be worked by other energy brokers across the country, because of the competitiveness of the market and rules that allow such routing, and that in smaller demand areas, the abuse is not as easily detected.


Impact Underestimated?


New York Municipal Power Agency, an organization representing 36  small cities in New York State, generating their own power, in a letter to the NYISO in July, put actual numbers to the problem.


NYMPA’s General Manager, Robert Mullane, wrote  that in May 2008, the additional charges generated, in part, from this practice amounted to $97 Million for one month  for just 36 municipalities – nine times NYISO’s budgeted charges to the NYMPA members for that month. NYPMA. 


In the same letter, Mullane said the NYISO uplift charge (for conveying electricity in “congested periods” for 36 NYMPA members in May 2008 was $15.3 million which was charged to customers, consumers of NYMPA electricity.


Mullane states: “The increased costs have a pernicious affect on NYMPA members’ finances. The cost of Residual Adjustments and uplift alone have increased NYMPA members’ ratepayers costs nearly one-cent per kilowatt-hour. In other words, NYMPA members’ share of these two costs for May 2008 alone was over $1.3 Million.”


The Little Towns Get Hit Hard.


 If these kinds of charges were distributed across the state, the total additional charges to power companies and utilities may be many times more. But no one knows apparently. No one knows.


The New York State cities in the New York Munipal Power Agency are not household names, and include none of the New York’s big cities, or most populated areas where, WPCNR would assume the overcharges would run into the billions. But, no one knows yet. The cities in the New York Municipal Power Agency are:


Akron, Andover, Angelica, Arcade, Bath Electric 7 Gas System, Bergen, Boonville, Brocton, Castile, Churchville, Endicott, Fairport Municipal Commission, Frankfort, Green Island Power Authority, Greene, Groton, Hamilton, Holley, Ilion Board of Light Company, Little Valley, Massena Electric Department, Mohawk Municipal Commission, Pen Yam Municipal Utility Board, Philadelphia, Plattsburgh Lighting Department, Richmondville, Rouses Point, Salamanca Board of Public Untilities, Sherburne, Silver Springs, Spencerport, Springville, Skaneateles, Theresa, Wellsville, Westfield.


Senator Schumer Meets.


Perhaps the full scope of the January to July Lake Erie  routing costs to the New York  customer will become clear Wednesday when Senator Charles Schumer meets with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  Chairman Joseph Kelliher. Schumer says he wants to assure a “thorough and public” investigation. Schumer’s office asked if the Senator would pursue of full-blown congressional hearing to discuss regulation of the energy markets, declined to comment.


Con Edison Lobbied NYISO to Stop The Lake Erie Maneuver.


Con Edison, WPCNR has learned from Andrew Stevens of  DC Energy in Vienna, Virginia,was instrumental in alerting  the New York Independent System Operator  to the ongoing routing of electricity around Lake Erie in the spring.  Con Edison, Stevens said applied pressure to get NYISO to prohibit as of July 22 what Senator Schumer has characterized as a“sham routing scheme” by “rogue energy traders.”


Stevens told WPCNR that his firm had drawn Con Edison’s attention to the routing practice and its impact on Con Edison charges.


Senator Schumer’s office has scheduled a News Conference Wednesday to discuss what Senator Schumer discovers after Wednesday’s meeting with Mr. Kelliher. The Senator’s press office. asked  by WPCNR if the Senator would seek a full-blown congressional investigation,  would say only the Senator was seeking “a thorough and public investigation by FERC.”


FERC Declines Clarification


WPCNR sent Barbara Connors, press officer for  electric in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, a series of  written questions based on FERC’s Acceptance of the NYISO steps to stop the practice as of July 22:


1.How many different Energy Brokers or energy sellers did this (sent electricity around Lake Erie, enjoying a discount for “relieving congestion”).  (total number of firms is asked here.)


 


2. Who are they — Could the FERC release a list in total of these “brokers”?  (if you will not, why not?)


 


3. How many times did each broker use the counter-clockwise route?


 


4. What were the total $$ amount of discounts brokers or whomever used the counter-clockwise route — during the 6 months and 3 weeks this was allowed?


 


5. What were the total profits enjoyed by those companies during the 6 months and 3 weeks this was going on?


 


6.What event or entity brought this practice to FERC’s attention — what were the circumstances?


 


7. Does FERC contemplate investigation of energy-manufacturer costs of raw materials — oil, coal, natural gas — to assure there were no markups?


 


8. What arm of FERC monitors costs of those raw materials to manufacture electric power — and how often do they do it?


 


9. What sanctions and penalties might be applied?


 


 


“This is a non-public investigation. I cannot tell you anything more than what was already stated  about it in  in the Order Accepting Tariff Sheets of August 21,” Ms. Connors said.


Connors said traders might be subject to fines of up to $1,000,000 a day, pending the investigation’s findings.


Connors said the investigation now underway has no timetable for completion. She would not comment on the scope of the investigation.


Perhaps, Senator Schumer will have better cooperation.

Posted in Uncategorized

Schumer:Traders Claim Juice Sent Long Way Around, Hiking Rates.Monitoring Lax

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR THE POWER NEWS.  Special to WPCNR September 14, 2008(EDITED) : WPCNR has obtained a detailed statement distributed privately by  Senator Charles Schumer’s office Friday in which the Senator charges energy traders with artificially inflating the costs of New York electricity, costing consumers tens of millions of dollars, contributing in part, to the 67% increase in electric rates alone experienced here in White Plains and Westchester County.


The Senator asks that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission provide the New York Independent System Operator bidding and scheduling information, which NYISO “market monitors” have not  received previously. NYISO has indicated to WPCNR previously “confidentiality” is needed to maintain competitive markets. Schumer’s statement implies NYISO has not had access to this information for years,  hampering the NYISO’s ability to spot spot alleged profiteering. Schumer’s statement strongly implies  NYISO might have prevented a circuitous electricity routing practice and other possible cost-sensitive circumstances if NYISO had this information.


Schumer’s office  release states —  a July 21st filing with FERC  (Federal Energy Regulatory Commisson) by the New York State Independent System Operator (NYISO), states beginning in at least January of this year, one or more market participants began to schedule circuitous and inefficient routes for transmission of electricity between states.



Direct transactions between two points – principally from New York to the PJM Service Territory in either Pennsylvania or New Jersey – were scheduled to be “sent” on a roundabout course that purportedly would travel around Lake Erie, transporting power through Ontario, Michigan and Ohio and then back to the intended destination in Pennsylvania or New Jersey, raising the cost of electricity by millions of dollars for months.


While the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) has yet to determine the exact costs of these trading practices, some estimate that increased congestion and “uplift” fees have cost consumers as much as $125 million in April and May of this year alone, and as much as $240-290 million overall, Schumer’s release states.


Schumer charges this practice may have played at least a part in New Yorkers’ utility bills, and the record bills faced by many municipal electric utilities. The scheduling concealed the volume of traffic that would travel on certain transmission paths.


The Runup on the Runaround


While the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) has yet to determine the exact costs of these trading practices, some estimate that increased congestion and “uplift” fees have cost consumers as much as $125 million in April and May of this year alone, and as much as $240-290 million overall. It appears that this practice may have played at least a part in New Yorkers spiking utility bills, as well as the record bills faced by many municipal electric utilities.


Furthermore, as the scheduling concealed the volume of traffic that would travel on certain transmission paths, system reliability was threatened due to unanticipated power loads traveling on already highly congested lines. Without proper monitoring, this could lead to regional and more system-wide outages and blackouts.


The unannounced power flowing over portions of the transmission grid had several serious economic impacts on New York ratepayers, Schumer’s office alleges, including —




    • Uplift Charges: The scheduling over circuitous paths increase unexpected congestion on transmission lines the cost of which is not attributable to a particular market participant. Then, in the Day-Ahead Market, the NYISO was forced to increase congestion charges to all users of the interface. That creates “uplift” in prices for all customers, the burden of which is passed onto to residential on commercial users.
    •  
    • Congestion Rent Shortfalls: The NYISO issues Transmission Congestion Contracts (TCC) with owners of transmission that rely on fully utilizing their capacity. These contracts can provide a benefit to consumers because, when capacity is maximized, the transmission owners pay a credit back to their customers under an arrangement with NYISO. However, if they cannot collect rents from all those who are using the lines – because some are piggybacking for free – a diminished credit is given. DC Energy, a party to this case with FERC estimates that congestion rent shortfalls has cost consumers on the order of $40 million since the beginning of 2008.
    •  
    • Costly Generation: With congestion clogging up transmission lines, utilities cannot rely on buying cheap power and must ramp up costly generation. In these instances, the NYISO would have to pay a premium to generators to hastily supply power when it cannot be brought in through transmission. This expensive fix would, again, be passed on directly to the consumer.

$800,000 in Overcharges in a Single Day. FERC Does Not Stop It for 2 Months.


To illustrate the cost of this practice on a single day,  Schumer’s release, continues, the NYISO calculated that on May 26, 2008 over 2000 megawatts (MW) were scheduled on the circuitous Lake Erie route: travelling to western New York before entering Ontario, then the Midwest Independent System Operator via Michigan and Ohio and then back to PJM in New Jersey or Pennsylvania. According to their analysis, on this day alone, $800,000 in uplift and congestion fees was attributable to this trading practice.


In Upstate New York, small cities like Plattsburgh, Rouses Point and Tupper Lake, for example, have been hit with exorbitant uplift fees from NYISO, hundreds of thousands of dollars in excess of what they usually pay, the statement says.


Schumer wrote FERC in August, demanding an end to these procedures:  “It is absolutely critical that FERC determine exactly who has been engaging in these practices; for how long has they have been occurring; and how much it has cost New York consumers and municipalities.”


FERC subsequently announced that they had begun the investigation in May of 2008, during the period when circuitous route trades were occurring. However, they did not put a stop to these trades until petitioned by the NYISO in July, 2008.


NYISO Monitors Have Not Gotten Bidding, Scheduling Info. Confidentiality Cited.


Schumer asked FERC to grant the NYISO’s request that NYISO Market monitors be given better access to NERC tag information and bidding and scheduling information. NYISO apparently does not receive this informationnow and have not for years, according to the tenor of the Senator’s statement.


The NYISO has asked that market monitors be given the authority to share bidding and scheduling information between different Regional Transmission Organizations such as New York’s NYISO, Ontario’s IESO, the Mid-Atlantic states’ PJM, the Midwest’s MISO, and ISO-New England.


In filings  according to the release circulated to WPCNR sources Friday, “the NYISO has asserted that that the inability of market monitors to share confidential information with each other impeded its efforts to try to identify and resolve the loop-flow issue.”


 Schumer asked that the market monitors be given this authority immediately, subject to suggested confidentiality provisions, to prevent further transmission problems.


 


U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer announced Friday he will meet with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chair Joseph Kelliher to press for a public investigation of  what his news release calls an “energy trading scam”  .


“We must get to the bottom of this greedy scheme. New Yorkers may have been cheated out of hundreds of millions of dollars because of a rogue energy trading scheme and there are a mess of questions left unanswered,” Schumer is quoted in his news release, said. “There are still too many questions that need immediate answers: how much did these trades cost New Yorkers; when did FERC first know about this and are there other loopholes that could be exploited? In our meeting, I will urge Mr. Kelliher to conduct a thorough and public investigation into these matters so that we can get to the bottom of what happened and swiftly nip any future problems in the bud.”


 


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

CON ED Up 67% in 9 Mos. Down 23% in Sept. Crude Down 45% Schumer Investigates

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. By John F. Bailey. September 13, 2008 UPDATED 1:40 P.M. EDT With Easy-to-Read, Comprehensive Charting:  As exclusively reported by WPCNR News and White Plains Week the last six months, Con Edison bills for White Plains consumers escalated  67% since November, and 39% of that increase coming over the 2008 June July and August period.


Con Edison,  told WPCNR exclusively on Thursday,  Westchester  residential consumers could expect their kilowatt hour charge to decline 25%in September, and be reflected in lower bills in October.  During the same three month period the cost of crude oil has declined 45%, but a price lag, presumably might be expected.



The cost per kwh has risen 67%  in White Plains since last November (2007)from 15.5 cents a kwh to 25 cents.  Con Edison explains this as being directly related to a passing on of direct fuel costs charged them by their electric suppliers.  Source: Con Edison and WPCNR


In a perhaps not-unrelated development, New York Senator Charles Schumer is calling on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to investigate possible price fixing and escalation of supply costs by energy suppliers furnishing Con Edison and other power companies with power through the state power grid, contributing substantially, Schumer alleges, to the Con Edison rates, and the rates other power companies are being forced to charge consumers. (Con Edison, it should be clear, is not the object of Mr. Schumer’s investigation.)


Schumer announced Friday he would meet with FERC next Wednesday to begin his probe of this year’s all-time high electric prices, and NYISO and FERC roles in regulating the delivery of power through the NYISO grid.


 



Bob McGee, a media spokesman for Con Edison told WPCNR exclusively Thursday that Con Edison’s average bill for Westchester customers using 450 kilowatt hours (if you have a two story home you are closer to 1,000 kwhs)  would decline 25% in September from its average high of 30.42 cents per kilowatt hour in August to the more manageable 23 cents per kwh, a predicted relief of 25%.


“As you can see, there has been a significant drop in the electricity supply cost in the September bills as compared to the August bills,” McGee said.


For the White Plains resident, who paid 25 cents per kwh in August, your rate would decline to approximately 19 cents if you apply Mr. McGee’s prediction of 25% to the current White Plains August rate of 25 cents/kwh.  Mr. McGee explained the average Westchester resident’s kwh price of 30.42 cents a kilowatt hour was due to other communities in the county paying more taxes on their Con Edison bill than White Plains does.


Con Edison Rate Relief Lags Behind Crude Oil Drop.


The Con Edison rate relief is proceeding at a slower pace than the three month decline in the world spot price of Crude Oil – blamed by Con Edison for its 65% increase in kilowatt hour rates since November. The bill for the White Plains customer using about 1,000 kilowatt hours a month has exploded 65% from  8 cents per kilowatt hour last November to 25 cents per kilowatt hour today – a 200% increase.



In that time the price of crude oil went from $90 a barrel on December 31, 2007  to $102 a barrel as of Thursday’s close, an increase of 13%. Of course crude oil ballooned to $145 a barrel about mid-June, but has since plummeted back to the $101-$102 a barrel benchmark.


Since the high oil mark of $145 a barrel in June, crude oil has declined 29%.


Meanwhile Con Edison raised the cost per kwh to White Plains customers 65% since January 1. Con Edison’s “drop” in pass-along costs, has not kept pace a  predicted 25%  cut resulting in White Plains customers still dealing with a 45% composite Con Edison rate hike – though to be fair — there is a lag in the time it takes to for prices to catch up with each other and they never syncronize.


The Stealth Increase: 15.5 Cents to 18.3 in  08


WPCNR and White Plains Week first reported on the Con Edison ratcheting up of prices in March of this year noting that kilowatt hour Supply price had gone up in White Plains from 8.5 cents to 13 cents – (15.5 cents was the kwh rate in November of 2007). As of January 31, the White Plains residential customer was paying 18.3 cents a kwh.  In May it was up to 19 cents, July 21 cents, and in August the highest kwh hour price White Plains customers have ever paid per kwh – 25 cents. 



Westchester Averages from Con Edison


WPCNR was the only media to report this increase, and Con Edison did not draw customers’ attention to the increase in their bill enclosures, as they did with last week’s bill where customers  got the bad news of the 25 cent KWH rate in their September 5 bill.


The average County resident was paying more  than the White Plains resident in August — 30.42 cents per kwh, according to Con Edison figures released to WPCNR Thursday. White Plains customers paid less (25 cents), due to lower tax rates in White Plains.


The Pass Along Blues


In the spring, WPCNR talked with Con Edison. Their press office reported that they are allowed to pass on increases in supply costs without approval by the New York Public Service Commission.  WPCNR asked Westchester County Department of Communications if the consumer Affairs bureau monitored these pass-along increases. WPCNR was informed the Consumer affairs bureau did not.


The New York Independent Services Operator which monitors spot electricity sales from which Con Edison purchases its electricity, told WPCNR that they did not monitor the different power companies manufacturing the electricity they sold as to whether the raw cost of refined fuels – oil, gas and coal – was being accurately and fairly added to the wholesale prices of electricity without being “marked up”. NYISO told WPCNR this was the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy   


No FERC spokesperson could explain to WPCNR how FERC actually assures fair and equitable pricing of power in relation to fuel costs. Apparently, Mr. Schumer wants to find out


Mr. McGee when asked why Con Edison’s 25% projecting did not match the 45% drop in the oil price said that Con Edison increased the price of Electric supply directly related to their costs:


“Energy supply costs are a direct pass through; Con Edison does not keep a nickel,” Mr. McGee said.

 

Con Ed Not Being Investigated


WPCNR wants to make it clear that Mr.Schumer is not investigating Con Edison, rather Mr. Schumer, according to his news release, is investigating circuitous, costly routing of electricity on the power grid that articificially, he charges, raises the price of electricity to power companies like Con Edison.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Retrospective on a Requiem: The Never-to-be-Forgotten Candlelight Walk

Hits: 0

WPCNR MAIN STREET JOURNAL. September 11, 2006 Retrospective on a Requiem: This evening at Liberty Park at 6:30 P.M., White Plains will hold its remembrance of this horrible day when the World Trade Center was ruthlessly diabolically, destroyed, taking the lives of  over 3,000 people, with the toll still climbing daily as its spawn. 


 Seven  years ago this Tuesday is the anniversary of the White Plains Candlelight Walk — an event organized to help the public of White Plains do something about the Trade Center genocide. The Candlelight Walk was a public outpouring of emotion that put into perspective how the events that took place seven years ago ripped us apart and brought all Americans of every race, religion, creed and origin together for a short time, a very short period of time — judging by the Presidential campaign of prejudice, class warfare and labeling now in full swing.  WPCNR reprints our impressions of that Candlelight Walk of Sunday, September 16, 2001.

Republished From WPCNR of  September  17, 2001:

They carried flags, “thank you signs,” and lit candles. They came from all races, ranks and religions to walk, remember and celebrate what it means to be an American and prayed for America’s future on the White Plains Candlelight Walk Sunday night…



 




Police estimated a crowd approaching 8,000 persons gathered at the White Plains Railroad Station and marched shoulder to shoulder, Black to White, Hispanic to Hassidim, Italian to Jew, Arab-to-Asian, Old-and-Young, American-to-American in a solemn, uplifting remembrance and rededication to America’s future.

Candlelight March on Main

The White Plains Candlelight Walk staggered city officials with the streaming turnout filling the broad Main Street boulevard with ranks of 30 to 40 persons shoulder-to-shoulder all the way from the City Hall steps to Bank Street.

By 7:15 PM the parking lot below the clock tower at the railroad station was filled, and still they came. Every race, every creed. Neighbors greeting each other. Shaking hands. Some carried signs. Some carried flags. Some brought their own candles, but they came. They walked. Pushed strollers. Children did not cry or misbehave. Persons said “Excuse me,” and smiled at each other. They knew this was important.



WHITE PLAINS REMEMBERS:Crowds milling at White Plains Railroad Station at twilight, awaiting start of Sunday evening’s Candlelight Walk to Remember the victims of the Trade Center catastrophe. WPCNR PHOTO



A disciplined group

They lit each others’ candles. At 7:35 PM they began to walk slowly south on Bank Street filling the broad cross street with quiet, orderly, confident humanity. For such a large crowd, they were serious and stalwart.

Some carried signs reading “Thank You White Plains Bravest and Finest,” and “Thank you Fire and Police.” They sang impromptu versions of “My Country ‘Tis of Thee,” and “The Star-Spangled Banner,” waving their flags. Their spirits were steady. Their pride high. No fear. Their love of country and fellow Americans was glowing.

The city stops for a remembrance

As dusk stole velvetly over the streets with an orange sun receding to the West, traffic on Hamilton Avenue stopped for this long freight train of White Plains citizens. They took 30 minutes to reach City Hall, and still, from this reporter’s vantage, reached back to Bank Street.

There was no honking of horns from stopped autombiles. No animosity. Motorists recognized something special: thousands of tentative, yet determined steps of America on the way back were being taken.

The City Clergy in a remarkable ceremony

At the City Hall steps, with Main Street jammed with humanity, a quiet, respectful crowd drew close to the old neo-classic columned brick façade. They waved flags, their candles in their hands glowed like they do at a Meadowlands concert.



MAYOR DELFINO OVERWHELMED: The Mayor stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Councilpersons, city clergy, choir, and dignataries, saying “God will get us through,” at the conclusion of the historic and moving White Plains Candlelight Walk on the steps of old City Hall. WPCNR PHOTO



Mayor Joseph Delfino welcomed the multitudes thanking all for coming, thanking the White Plains firemen and policemen for their efforts the past week, but his remarks were hard to hear. Somehow you did not have to hear them. Everyone understood what he was saying. Everyone felt it, too. I did.

The Mayor was surrounded by a host of the White Plains clergy from many churches behind him. The men and women of the cloth had assembled at his call to present an ecumenical service of remembrance and prayer for the victims of the World Trade Center disaster. There was a chorale group and ensemble. But, I cannot tell you who they are at this point.

The message you heard even if you could not hear it

There were no news releases or media briefs at this gathering. No text of the Mayor’s remarks was handed out. He did not make many. It was not that kind of event. It was regretfully special. You did not need to know who was offering the prayers, rabbi or priest, minister or pastor.

The different prayers and appropriate hymns rose on the cool early autumn night echoing skyward, warming hearts, and somehow fit splendidly meaningfully together. The White Plains clergy, in this reporter’s opinion, should do this more often under pleasanter circumstances. It was very special and so right.

The impromptu public address system could not be heard clearly beyond 100 feet. However, the people of White Plains listened and soaked in the spirit of the sweetly sung entreaties to The Almighty, with no catcalls, no disrespect, dedication and silent endorsement of the message. Children did not cry.

A moving sequence

The most moving sequence of the service occurred when each Man and Woman of God voiced a prayerful sentiment and the ensemble sang “Lord, listen to your children preying.” It was a White Plains “Moment to Remember.”

The service concluded with the throng singing “We Shall Overcome.” After several moving choruses with the multitude of citizens swaying together, the final stanza which goes “We Shall Stand Together,” closed the old 60s protest song with a roll of applause and cheers.

The Mayor rallies the crowd

Mayor Delfino came to the podium. With clergy, councilpersons, and congresspersons to his right and left, spoke proudly and earnestly to the crowd:

“Never would I have believed that we’d have such a turnout. I am overwhelmed, this is truly the greatest community in America,” and went on to thank all the city’s clergy for coming together for the service, saying that “God would get us through.”

The Mayor said that there was a Remembrance Book in the City Hall rotunda, which would be placed in the White Plains Public Library for all to sign. The Mayor announced this because not all of the thousands could march into the rotunda to sign it that evening, which brought one of the few laughs of the night.

Everyone leaves with a sense of a job to be done

The remarkable evening of remembrance and renewal closed with a rousing singing of “God Bless America,” with outstanding voices from the steps of City Hall, helping the citizens out with the second and third verses.

The crowd slowly dispersed.

They returned to cars, parents pushing strollers, couples arms over shoulders. Old city and county political rivals often adversaries, shook hands on the City Hall steps.

Some young persons in their 20s stood in front of the fenced off E J Conroy Drive, and, impromptu, shouted “USA,USA!” Then they changed what they were chanting. They crossed their hearts and began to recite, in unison: “The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag,” getting every word right with dignity and dedication.

You should have been there, but you wished you never had to be.


EPILOGUE (Written in 2006): It is seven years since 9-11-01, and the sense of working together has left us.


Instead today we see a fractured politicized landscape in which our “leaders” have played upon our fears to restrict the very freedoms that created America and which we stand, or used to stand.


 Leaders play citizen group off citizen group, use minorities as scapegoats, and sanctimoniously proclaim their patriotism. Most distrubing of all, they pass the buck and refuse to take responsibility, and do not communicate and cover up.  It is sobering to see so many weak people elected to office and being selected to run for office, some without even the experience to execute the position.


The legacy of America is still there. Whether our “leaders” understand it, I am no longer confident.


The job is not to ask what can I get out of my country and government, but what I can do for my country and to improve the way I govern for  all not just the connected, the influential and the powerful, and the managerially challenged and whether it will benefit me the officeholder/seeker — and this goes from the Oval Office to every, Governor’s Office, Mayor’s Office, Assemblyperson’s office, State Senator’s office, County Legislator’s office.


Your job is not to turn Americans and races and groups against each other but to work for the good of all, please.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Hockley’s Last Stand: Challengers Fail Across 27/29 Districts.Dem Leaders Roll

Hits: 0

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2008 By John F. Bailey at Democratic City Committee Headquarters, 120 Bloomingdale Road, September 9, 2008 UPDATED midnight with Board of Election Results: “That’s what we do best is work together,” said John Kirkpatick, newly elected Democratic District leader as jubilant Democrat Leaders celebrated an across-the-Board sweep of 27 of 29 contested Election Districts in the city in Tuesday evening’s rare Democratic City Committee District Leader Primary Election brought about by an effort by some 52 “challengers” seeking to replace longtime incumbent Democratic Leaders.



Democratic City CommitteeeCo-Chair  Liz Shollenberger Posting the Big Numbers


The challengers, mostly sympathetic to Councilman Glen Hockley, lost badly as an estimated 20% of Democratic Registered voters turned out. Benjamin Boykin, City Councilman said of the result to WPCNR, “The Democrats of this City have sent Glen Hockley a message. His run is over.” (It is widely expected that Mr. Hockley will not be renominated to run for Common Council again, or for Mayor, as a result of this challenge he mounted._)


The vote was close in only 4 districts: 15 (from North Street west to Mamaroneck Avenue),16 (Ferris Avenue east to Cottage Place), 20 (Woodcrest Heights)  and 32 (portion of Battle Hill).


Only one Challenger  appeared to have won, Yvonne Taylor, and that was in doubt since she was only leading by one vote pending counting of 3 paper ballots. In the other district, where Challenger John Lanman was tied with District Leader Victoria Presser, a tie is decided by the majority, according to Mr. Sharp, therefore meaning that Lanman, should results hold would most likely be whisked out by the overwhelming majority returned and voted into party office tonight.



Tim Sharp, Co-Chair of the Democratic City Committee attributed the stunning victory to getting the message out: “The key was that people came to understand this was a primary about nothing of any importance. It was all about Glen Hockley only and his ambition.”


Before a jubilant crowd of District Leaders assembled who had come in reporting results from their districts, Elizabeth Schollenberger, Co-Chair complimented Steve Wallfish for first bringing the primary threat to he Democratic Party’s attention and thanked David Buckner for providing the computer expertise and advertising creavity to craft the party’s media campaign that informed the Registered voters.  The crowd included Assemblypersons Adam Bradley and Amy Paulin, State Senator Suzi Oppenheimer, Assemblyman George Latimer, Councilpersons Benjamin Boykin, Dennis Power, Milagros Lecuona and Rita Malmud. Mr. Hockley was not present.


As of 10:30 this evening, 27 districts were won outright by Democratic City Committee-endorsed District Leaders with District 20 and District 32 in doubt. Even Glen Hockley, the leader of the “Challenge movement” dubbed by Democratics, the “Republicrats,” alluding to many of the Hockley sympathizers having been former Republicans, went down to defeat by a 3 to 1 margin, losing to Ellen Blauner and Deborah Ziph by a 3 to 1 margin. Democrats gleefully pointed out to WPCNR that Hockley, now no longer a district leader, would not be able to vote in the party’s reorganization meeting next Wednesday, September 17.


Asked about how the now-united Democratic City Committee would go about choosing whom to run against Mayor Joseph Delfino in next year’s Mayoral election with five candidates: Adam Bradley, Bill Ryan, and Councilpersons Benjamin Boykin, Rita Malmud and  Dennis Power obvious contenders, Paul Schwarz said the Nominating Committee as has been custom would make the decision from among those who express an interest in running.



Architects of Hockley’s Last Stand: Tim James and Mrs. James, Liz Shollenberger, Co-Chairs of the Democratic City Committee


The Results as Reported by the Westchester County Board of Elections:


 UNOFFICIAL RESULTS FROM THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS   


*** Indicates Democratic City Committee Leader Candidates.













































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 01    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ALISON E GREENE*** 95 39%
DEM ELEN GUAGENTI TAX 27 11%
DEM OREN J TEICHER*** 98 41%
DEM STEVE GREEN 22 9%
  Office Totals 242 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 02    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM JOHN D SULLIVAN 13 9%
DEM JOHN M MARTIN*** 56 39%
DEM MARSHA A SULLIVAN 15 11%
DEM PAULINE C OLIVA*** 58 41%
  Office Totals 142 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 03    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM BRUCE S HANDLER 4 6%
DEM CHERYL J BRADLEY*** 27 44%
DEM THADDEU KUCZINSKI*** 28 45%
DEM WILLIAM D FRUMKIN 3 5%
  Office Totals 62 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 05    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ANTHONY CIARAMELLA 20 14%
DEM LINDA Y LANDESMAN*** 61 44%
DEM MARK A GUTERMAN*** 59 42%
  Office Totals 140 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 06    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM CAREY E GOULDNER*** 67 47%
DEM ERIC M SANDERS 8 6%
DEM STEPHEN B WALFISH*** 69 48%
  Office Totals 144 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 07    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ADRIENNE PINCUS 20 9%
DEM BEN BOYKIN II 84 39%
DEM FRANK PANDOLFO 25 12%
DEM JUSTIN C BRASCH 87 40%
  Office Totals 216 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 09    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM DOROTHY L DICINTIO 55 45%
DEM GARRY R KLEIN 6 5%
DEM MAX F HOCKLEY 4 3%
DEM RIENA KAPLOW 56 46%
  Office Totals 121 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 10    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ADAM T BRADLEY 82 48%
DEM DOUG S RUTTENBERG 22 13%
DEM WILLA R SWILLER 66 39%
  Office Totals 170 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 11    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM DAVID AZRIN 43 49%
DEM STUART STANDARD 8 9%
DEM SUSAN L ZILBER 37 42%
  Office Totals 88 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 12    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM CHERYL COVE 23 13%
DEM DANIEL R SEIDEL 67 38%
DEM JOHN KIRKPATRICK 67 38%
DEM ROBERT J COHLAN 21 12%
  Office Totals 178 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 14    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM BARBARA SCHWARTZ 92 45%
DEM RACHEL ECKHAUS 9 4%
DEM RITA Z MALMUD 92 45%
DEM VALENTINA MANCUSO 13 6%
  Office Totals 206 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 15    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ABBE D GOODMAN 29 23%
DEM CAROLINE KYZIVAT 34 27%
DEM GERALD P GOODMAN 23 18%
DEM WILLIAM BROWN JR 40 32%
  Office Totals 126 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 16    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM JUDITH A ROSS 23 24%
DEM NANCY M YANOFSKY 24 25%
DEM RHODA W FIDLER 25 26%
DEM STEPHEN H ROSS 24 25%
  Office Totals 96 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 17    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ANDREA REED 32 42%
DEM JESSICA R VARGAS 35 45%
DEM ROCCO R PERROTTA 10 13%
  Office Totals 77 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 18    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ELIZABETH P ROACH*** 66 45%
DEM JEREMY S KASMAN 10 7%
DEM THOMAS M ROACH JR*** 71 48%
  Office Totals 147 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 19    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM FRAN H KATZ 31 24%
DEM MAUREEN M COHEN*** 57 44%
DEM ROBERT L HOCH*** 41 32%
  Office Totals 129 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 20    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ERIC K MORGAN*** 31 24%
DEM JEROME A CONTEE 26 20%
DEM THOMAS CARUSO JR*** 41 32%
DEM YVONNE E TAYLOR 32 25%
  Office Totals 130 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 21    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM FERNANDO A CORTES 23 19%
DEM GEOFFREY D SMITH*** 38 32%
DEM HARRIS A LIEBER 22 18%
DEM SAUL M YANOFSKY*** 36 30%
  Office Totals 119 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 23    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM DEBORAH W ZIPF*** 36 38%
DEM ELLEN C BLAUNER*** 38 40%
DEM GLEN S HOCKLEY 11 12%
DEM TAPANI TALO 9 10%
  Office Totals 94 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 24    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM CHERYL C MELTON*** 56 42%
DEM STACEY S SPENCER 29 22%
DEM ZELLE W ANDREWS*** 47 36%
  Office Totals 132 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 27    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM CAROLYN ABRAMOWTZ*** 43 43%
DEM GLENNA B DUGGAN 9 9%
DEM JAMES DUGGAN 4 4%
DEM WILLIAM J RYAN*** 44 44%
  Office Totals 100 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 28    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM AKIMA C WATTY 9 12%
DEM JAMES MAZZONE*** 38 51%
DEM JOHN H AVERILL*** 28 37%
  Office Totals 75 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 29    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM HENRY T FERLAUTO 22 20%
DEM MONIQUE G GUIDRY*** 45 41%
DEM TONY P OFFURUM*** 42 39%
  Office Totals 109 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 32    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM JESSICA LUCIANO 28 23%
DEM JILL C OWENS*** 32 26%
DEM JONATHAN LANMAN 31 25%
DEM VICTORIA PRESSER*** 31 25%
  Office Totals 122 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 33    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM AMY M MCCANDLESS 17 11%
DEM ARNOLD STREISFELD 21 13%
DEM IRENE A THOMPSON*** 70 43%
DEM LYDIA P BARKLEY*** 54 33%
  Office Totals 162 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 34    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM CHARLES MORGAN*** 48 44%
DEM RAYMON INDELICATO 33 30%
DEM VICKI LARREYNAGA*** 29 26%
  Office Totals 110 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 37    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM JAMIE F BAKER 15 14%
DEM LIZ SHOLLENBERGER*** 45 43%
DEM TIM JAMES*** 44 42%
  Office Totals 104 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 39    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ERIDANIA CAMACHO*** 43 42%
DEM LUCAS A SCIMIA 20 19%
DEM VICTOR AVENDANO*** 40 39%
  Office Totals 103 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 42    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM DENNIS J POWER*** 98 37%
DEM KAREN M PASQUALE*** 88 34%
DEM MARK I SIRKIN 35 13%
DEM MELODY S HOCKLEY 41 16%
  Office Totals 262 100%

Posted in Uncategorized

Wood: LCOR has Paid City Its Tardy $5 Million. LCOR has “Other Finance Sources”

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE DEVELOPER NEWS. September 9, 2008 UPDATED 2:45 P.M. E.D.T.: City Hall reported to WPCNR this afternoon that LCOR has paid the city the $5 Million it previously was in default on  since June 30, when it failed to pay the second installment on the land for their 55 Bank Street project.  


The issue was raised by broadcast reports said Lehman Brothers, the investment banking firm,  long touted by LCOR, the developer of the 55 Bank Street affordable housing project as their source of financing of the 80-20 affordable housiong $350 Million  project, that Korean Development Bank, the firm expected to provide a badly needed cash infusion to Lehman Brothers, has withdrawn their interest, creating a cash bind for the Lehman Brothers firm. This could conceivably rule out Lehman financing all or a portion of the LCOR White Plains Project.


Paul Wood, White Plains Executive Officer, in response to WPCNR inquires, reports LCOR paid White Plains the tardy  $5 Million  plus $9,000 interest that was due June 30, and had not been previously received, having been held in escrow. Wood told WPCNR the money was paid the city approximately August 15.


Asked how the Lehman Brothers troubles might affect the ability of LCOR to go ahead on the project, Wood said LCOR had “other financiers. You’d have to aske them.” Asked if he would be contacting LCOR to see how their financial sources shaped up, Wood said he thought he would. Wood indicated the project was still on, regardless of the Lehman Brothers situation.


Previously LCOR had been holding $5 Million in escrow as payment for the second installment on the land which the city sold them to build the project upon on Bank Street.


For a more detailed look at the Lehman Brothers situation, visit Marketwatch at http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/lehman-tumbles-fears-over-raising/story.aspx?guid=%7B4389ABCB%2D2381%2D417D%2DA426%2D5EE9B2C1946E%7D&siteid=aolpf1&icid=snap-nws

Posted in Uncategorized

Con Ed’s Kilowatt Hour Price Hits 25 cents — UP 65% Since December!

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. By John F. Bailey. September 5, 2008:  Con Edision has raised the price of electrictiy 65% in eight months. The Consolidated Edison charge per kilowatt hour has hit an all time high in August, rising 21% to 25.4 cents per kilowatt hour for Supply and Delivery charges combined on the typical Westchester bill.



The 25.4 cents is rapidly approaching the 28 cents predicted by the Con Edison media relations department to WPCNR, back in June. August cost  of 25.4 cents  is up from 21 cents a kilowatt hour in July and 19.45 cents in June.


Con Edison told WPCNR last month they had been able to keep the price down in July due to the efforts of their energy buyers, but apparently the runup in oil this summer has taken its toll, Con Edision includes this explanation in the current electric bill for August:



“You’ve heard about rising energy costs. Sharp increases in the cost of oil, natural gas, and other fossil fuels have driven up the cost of producing the electricity that Con Edison buys for you and delivers to your home.” Con Edison’s flyer predicts summer 2008 (June-September) bills to be approximately 22% higher than summer 2007.


However, in 8 months, the Con Edison has raised the cost of electricity to Westchester consumers from 15.4 cents per kilowatt hour to 25.4 cents — a 65% increase — substantially higher than the cost runup of oil the last eight weeks.


In

Posted in Uncategorized