Private Jets, Charters Face Tighter, Demanding TSA Security Checks, Monitoring.

Hits: 0

WPCNR’S FRIENDLY SKIES. January 4, 2009: Flying friendly politicians to Hawaii by private charter jet  from White Plains, or to Japan on junket or some well-connected pals to Fort Lauderdale for a winter break will not be so easy in the next few years if the Transportation Security Administration has its way.



A typical Charter Aircraft Awaits passengers in July at Westchester County Airport.


The Transportation Security Administration is seeking comment on tough new security procedures for private aircraft weighing over 12,500 pounds and their private flights and chartered flights they fly. Westchester County Airport has many  such flights on private aircraft on charter companies each day where security is left up to the individual company or aircraft owner.


The presumption is the passengers on those flights are known. In the future that golf trip to Hawaii, that ski trip to Colorado even perhaps on a small General Aviation single engine plane may require considerably more advanced planning, including submitting passenger lists and passing it past a Security Watch List may be required. Will the charter aircraft companies be checking you out, or will the TSA? The  TSA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking will be  the subject of a public hearing Tuesday at Westchester County Airport at 9 A.M., at Building 1 on Airport Road.




One of hundreds of private jets that use Westchester County Airport — just perfect for the ski vacations to Telluride, or the ponies at Saratoga, or a toasty weekend in The Bams. They fly out of and into medium-sized and major airports throughout the country. Owners, companies, and charter flight operators would be subject to baggage, arms, security checks and reporting passengers under the TSA rules


The measures if enacted would rachet up security clearance procedures, including pilot background checks. Operators professional and private would have to clear passenger identities on charters or your own private jet against national “Security Watch Lists,” in advance. Companies would be required to appoint security managers for charter air services, are among the more prominent changes the TSA is proposing.


The Notice of Proposed Rule Making calls for such procedures for private flights chartered or private departing airports across the country.  Westchester County Airport will host the first of these hearings Tuesday morning at 9 A.M. Registration.  To speak on the rules changes interested persons must arrive at 8 A.M. at Building 1, Airport Road at the airport. You will only be allowed to speak for 3 minutes.


To read the complete notice go to the AOPA website at http://download.aopa.org/epilot/2008/081216lasp.pdf


 For more information on the proposed rule or to find out how to submit your comments visit the AOPA member action center at http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/gasecurity/


The TSA is especially interested in comments on these issues:


(1) The weight threshold of aircraft covered by the proposed rule.


(2) The phased approach in the implementation of the proposed rule and the


determination of which phase would be applicable to each large aircraft operator.


(3) The security threat assessment (STA) requirements, including the


transferability of the STAs for flight crew members and whether a proprietor, general


partner, officer, director, or owner of aircraft operators should undergo a STA.


(4) Methods for positively identifying pilots and effectively linking them to the


aircraft they are operating.


(5) The watch list service provider (WLSP) requirement, including comments on


the WLSP.s system security plan, the role that watch-list service providers may continue


to have if the responsibility for watch-list matching shifts to the U.S. Government in the


future, whether there should be a limitation of the number of entities that would be


approved as a WSLP, and whether WLSP covered personnel should be limited only to


U.S. citizens, nationals or lawful permanent residents.


(6) Whether TSA should establish a minimum time for submission of passenger


information to the service providers, what that minimum time should be, and the reasons


supporting the suggested minimum time.


(7) Whether full program aircraft operators should be permitted to conduct their


own audit and/or watch list matching on flights operated under their LASP.


(8) Proposed privacy notice requirement.


(9) The third party auditor requirement, including the establishment of a system of


assigning auditors and methods of doing so, qualifications of auditors, and conflict of


interests and independence issues affecting an auditor.


(10) Whether certain large aircraft operators (for instance, operators that are not


carrying persons or property for compensation or hire or with aircraft having a MTOW of


more than 45,500 kg) should have a different requirement as to what weapons are


prohibited (for example, limit the prohibited items to only guns and firearms).


(11) The requirement for security coordinator, including the use of a single


individual for multiple security coordinator roles.


(12) Whether any other types of airport should be covered by a security program.


(13) Amendment of the partial program or the supporting program for airports.


(14) Applicability of the proposed rule to fractional ownership operations.


(15) Qualifications of individuals who would be exempted from liability under the


voluntary provision of emergency services.


Hearings will also be held January 8 in Atlanta, January 16 in Chicago, January 23 in Burbank, California, and January 28 in Houston.

Posted in Uncategorized

Downtown Music Starts New Year Musically Wednesdays.

Hits: 0

WPCNR DOWNBEAT. January 3, 2008: Downtown Music, a nonprofit performing arts organization located in the heart of White Plains, begins its calendar of events for the New Year on January 7 with a warming trumpet and piano concert, “Drive the Cold Winter Away.” The half-hour lunchtime concerts are free and begin at 12:10pm.  All January concerts take place at Grace Church, which is located on the corner of Church Street and Main Street in White Plains.


Here’s the schedule:


 


.


WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 7, 12:10 PM


Drive the cold winter away – Pyrotechnics for Trumpet with John Charles Thomas joined by Bari Mort at the piano.      Works will include La Virgen de la Macarena (1949) by Bernardino Monterde (1868-1922), arrangement by Rafael Mendez (1906-1981); Légende (1906) by George Enescu (1881-1955); and Andaluza (1906) by Enrique Granados (1867-1916), arrangement by Rafael Mendez.


WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 14, 12:10 PM


It Takes Two – Virtuoso works of Brahms, Kreisler and Bartók performed by Nicole Diaz, violin, and Mory Ortman, piano.


The concert will include the first movement from Brahms’s Violin Sonata in G Major; three shorts pieces by Kriesler (Rondino, Liebeslied, and Schoen Rosmarin); and Romanian folk dances by Bartók.


WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 12:10 PM


Noonday Jazz Jack Wilkins and Jeff Barone, acoustic guitars, and Chris Berger, acoustic bass, play music from the Great American Songbook. Songs include I Guess I’ll Have to Change My Plan by Arthur Schwartz; When I Fall in Love and Stella by Starlight by Victor Young; I Can’t Get Started and Taken a Chance on Love by Vernon Duke; You My Love and It Could Happen to You by Jimmy Van Heusen; I’ll See You in My Dreams and It Had to Be You by Isham Jones; and More Than You Know and Tea for Two by Vincent Youmans.


WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 28, 12:10 PM


Music from the Conservatory – A program featuring the Faculty Baroque Ensemble of the Music Conservatory of Westchester: soprano Mary Elizabeth Poore, flutist Stefani Starin, and Jean Newton, harpsichord.


ABOUT DOWNTOWN MUSIC


Downtown Music at Grace was founded in 1988 by Timothy Lewis, Director of Music and Organist of Grace Church in heart of White Plains. Downtown Music delights audiences with its beautiful setting and professional weekday and weekend performances consisting of a wide spectrum of musical genres from classical to ethnic music. The mission of Downtown Music is to provide an oasis of art and culture in the heart of White Plains.



For more information about Downtown Music or the November concerts, please visit our web site: www.DTMusic.org or call (914) 248-1112.

Posted in Uncategorized

City on Brink of Ending Ritz Rock Traffic Island Dispute.

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey. January 2, 2009: The Common Council will consider Monday evening an ordinance approving a 10-year lease of the Renaissance Square traffic island to LC Main at a cost of $3,000 a year for ten years ($30,000). If approved, the action appears to end the 9-month dispute of Louis Cappelli’s erecting a stone Ritz-Carlton entrance sign on the 30 foot by 4 foot traffic island without city approval, in the middle of a city right of way.



The Ritz Rock today. The toney Ritz Carlton White Plains is in the background.


Ritz Rock Dispute Being Settled Quietly? The Ritz Carlton sign on a traffic island in Renaissance Square, subject of articles in major metropolitan dailies the last eight months and an ongoing festering feud between the city and LC Main LLC, (the city wanted the monument torn down, and refused to sell the island to the developer, as well as refusing to consider leasing plans for the island) appears headed towards a peaceful solution Monday evening.



According to the documents circulated with the Common Council agenda, the Department of Public Works will permit the continued presence of the previously offending stone if Mr. Cappelli replaces the inclined edge of the island with a 6 inch perpendicular curb. The possibility of vehicles rolling up over the aesthetic inclined slope of the toney island, was a principle Public Works objection to the island (it being against code). According to the terms made public today, Mr. Cappelli’s organization also agrees to accept all liability resulting from any traffic accidents involving the island, and has sole responsibility for its upkeep. The agreement is nontransferable without Council permission.


In a letter from City Commissioner of Planning, Susan Habel, the Commissioner states in support of the lease agreement that  “The Planning Department finds that the City has entered into a significant number of license agreements with private property owners to permit use or encumbrance of public right of way, and has accepted liability for the White Plains Beautification gardens in the right of way. The Planning Department further finds that the traffic island on Renaissance Square with the Ritz Carlton sign is attractive, and provides a sense of predestrian scale to an otherwise very wide street crossing.”


The Commissioner sites 12 other such sites already existing in the city that the White Plains Beautification Foundation plants and maintains with donor signage as support for granting the Cappelli license, and notes 10 other sites where organizations have “entered into license agreements for intrusions in the public right of ways,” including The Seasons, The Galleria Mall, 360 Hamilton Avenue, Dunkin Donuts, Key Ford, Fortunoffs, City Center(Valet Parking), 235-245 Main Street, Storage Deluxe and the Westchester Arts Council (Sign Banners over Mamaroneck Avenue).


 The Council rejected Mr. Cappelli’s offer to purchase the island for $18,000. LC Main LLC then submitted a request to lease or obtain a license. Subsequent efforts of the Cappelli organization to obtain the lease or license was tabled by the council for about eight months. Meanwhile, the Cappelli organization went to court on grounds that the city should consider their request and had engaged in “abuse of discretion.”  In December, the Council referred the request out to departments.


Councilman Glen Hockley told WPCNR a month ago at the time of the refer-out, that  the council was releasing the request for referral because it had become clear that Judge Susan Cacace was not going to issue a favorable ruling, “when it became clear the city was not going to prevail in court.”


The ordinance to be considered Monday evening appears to end the dispute should it be approved.

Posted in Uncategorized

WP-ERS,NY-ers Face Double Whammy: 18% Cuts in STAR EXEMPTS Close Budget Gap

Hits: 0

 



WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. By John F. Bailey. December 31, 2008 UPDATED January 1, 2009: The Governor’s Budget for 2009-2010 at this time plans a repeat of the reduction in the STAR Basic and Enhanced Exemptions that will cost  the average White Plains taxpayer  owner of the median home valued at from $600,000 ($700,000 as recent as six months ago) an automatic $301 and UP increase in school taxes if passed by the legislature, while quietly filling the state’s depleted money vaults.


If your home is valued higher than the median, you’re paying hundreds more automatically if the legislature passes the  twin cuts.


Last year this  STAR smashing technique was used by the Eliot Spitzer Administration and the legislature to pay for 75% of the increased school aid that was touted as a benefit to school districts, “financial aid” they called it.


Local legislators professed ignorance of this, blaming the New York State Office of Real Property Services,  despite the fact that the legislators had to vote the exemption cuts in as part of the Governor’s budget.


Lowering the  BASIC and ENHANCED STAR exemptions by 10%, the legislature made taxpayers pay for ¾ of the increased school aid they touted as “aid to taxpayers.” Only taxpayers reading the CitizeNetReporter were aware of this stealth tax increase, because no other media chose to report it.


 It worked so well, the governor’s office is now doing it again.



The Governor’s office has been queried by WPCNR as to how much additional revenue this would bring in. Last year the 10% decrease in the STAR Basic conveniently generated $1.7 Billion in property tax revenues direct from the taxpayers, 99% of whom were not aware of it.


The 2008-2009 budget gap currently estimated by the Governor’s office is $1.7 Billion. It would appear the 18% STAR Exemption cuts would erase that and then some.


This tax year, the lowering of the Basic increased the median home ($700,000) owner’s taxes $186. The senior citizen over 65 enjoying Enhanced STAR status, with the same median home found their tax going up $641. If you were below the median your property tax went up less, above it, you paid more than $186 and $641.


The 18% Cut Adds Up


In 2009-2010, the proposed 18% cut in the two STARS will hit harder. The BASIC STAR median home owner will find their tax bill going up $301, the ENHANCED STAR owner will go see their school tax go up $596 before the School District, the City  and the County take their pieces out of you.


Taxpayers should note that the $301 and $596 figures are based on this years School Tax Rate of $501, which is almost assuredly going to go up substantially unless the School District enacts drastic spending cuts. If the School Tax Rate goes up the same as 2008-2009 did ($27 per thousand) the tax rate will climb to $528/$1,000 of assessed valuation.


Figure It Out


If you would like to figure out what the 18%  cuts do to your School Property Taxes, pull out your latest property tax bill that you received from the city  that is due January 31), and deduct $2,731 from your Assessed Value if you enjoy BASIC STAR.


If you are over 65 and enjoying ENHANCED STAR, deduct $5,330 from your Assessed Value


Divide the answer by 1,000 and multiply that answer by the current tax rate ($501.01), and you’ll see what the STAR EXEMPTION cut will mean in your own tax bill.


Making Up Lost Revenue


Geofrey Gloak of the New York State Department of Real Property Services explained the lowering of the floor was to catch up with ten years of real estate value growth which  have made many more homeowners eligible for the STAR Basics and Enhanceds Exemptions, costing the state revenue.


Mr. Gloak, contacted by WPCNR, confirmed the planned increase in the exemptions and explained why the Governor’s Office was doing this. It appears this is planned because the state is losing too much revenue from increased real estate values.


“Part of the Governor’s Budget Proposal calls for the annual adjustment to
the STAR exempt amount floor to be increased from 10% to 18%.  Before you
ask, here’s what that means.

When the original STAR legislation was enacted in 1998, it established
flat-dollar exemption amounts — $30,000 of full value for the Basic
Exemption and $50,000 for the Enhanced Exemption.


It also specified how they would be adjusted for certain downstate counties because of major
differences in real estate values between the upstate and downstate areas,
and how the assessed-value equivalent of these exemptions would be
calculated for those assessing units that were not assessing at full market
value — through application of the equalization rate.

If equalization rates fell in future years because of rising local real
estate values and unchanging assessments, the STAR exemption amounts
entered on the roll would similarly fall, other things equal. The
Legislature was concerned that this could mean a decline in the STAR
benefit from one year to the next, and thus instituted a 5% “floor,” which
limited the amount the exemption could decline annually in significantly
appreciating real estate markets.

In some parts of the State, strong residential real estate appreciation
during the first part of this decade resulted in the floor “kicking in”
annually. This had the effect of increasing the market value of the STAR
exemption significantly — beyond the original flat amounts of $30,000 and
$50,000.

When the current-year (2008-09) budget was enacted, it included a provision
that changed the floor on reductions in the equalized STAR exemption from
5% to 10%, thereby increasing the rate at which the exemption could be
brought back into line with the amounts originally implemented beginning in
1998. 


In the recently-released Governor’s Budget Proposal, the floor would
be changed once again – to 18% — thus accelerating once again the process
of realignment with the original STAR exemption amounts.


John, Hopefully, this will help you and your readers to understand the
floor concept.


 You also might note that Westchester County has the highest
savings as a result of STAR in the state – 270% higher than the statewide
average and 58% higher than the next highest county (Rockland).


Some Good News from ORPS


Mr. Gloak reports that the White Plains Equalization Rate has remained at 2.75% for the new tax year which is good news for the White Plains City Assessor, Lloyd Tasch who will be issuing the new tax roll Friday morning.


The State reports that in the year ending June 30, 2008, White Plains Real Estate values have gone down only slightly which perhaps means that the White Plains Assessments will remain at or above the $290.2 Million of 2008-2009. 


The new assessments due Friday will not reflect the precipitious decline in White Plains housing prices the last six months.


It would be good news for the School District which faces an automatic 7% growth in spending if they do not cut spending going into 2009-2010, but at least they would know their tax base is stable (except that White Plains taxpayers, if the legislature goes along with the 18% exemption will start off hundreds of dollars higer automatically.)

Posted in Uncategorized

Schumer, Hall Talk of Millions for Tri-County Metro North Projects w/ObamaBucks

Hits: 0

                WPCNR CONSIST. By John F. Bailey. December 30, 2008: Senator Charles Schumer and Congressman John Hall made a whistle stop at the White Plains Transit Center Tuesday (both arriving by car)and reported at a news conference  that a new $20 Billion Obama Administration Economic Recovery Package dedicated to Mass Transit was all but certain to be signed into law by President Barack Obama January 21. Schumer expected this to provide millions  for local Metro North improvements that would lead to local economic spending by construction companies and  workers employed on those projects.



Senator Charles Schumer arrives at the White Plains Metro North Railroad Station Tuesday


The  Obama Mass Transit stimulus, Schumer said was expected to allocate $4 Billion to New York State, most of which would be used by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to upgrade aesthetics, parking, trackage, and substations on the Harlem, Hudson  and Port Jervis rail lines. The funds would furnish dollars for what Schumer described as projects delayed because of the MTA budget crunch. In addition, he and Congressman Hall were working on a national $2 Billion stimulus for Mass Transit Operations relief, a portion of which New York might receive  about $400 Million to lower the MTA-propoed 23% fare increases scheduled to hit in June.


 



                Congressman John Hall, left, and Senator Charles Schumer taking questions at the news conference.


The relief to reduce MTA fare hikes would not be addressed until the fall, Schumer thought, saying it would probably be included in the congressional transit bill that is renewed every five years. The Senator said he and Congressman Hall are working towards the new administration supplying an this $2 Billion stimulus nationally dedicated to operations costs that could be applied to reducing fares.


Schumer estimated New York would receive about $400 Million of that stimulus if the Obama Administration and congress pass it.


MTA Proposes Budget Cuts, Fare Increases, Service Cuts.


The MTA has a $1.2 Billion deficit and proposed two weeks ago for commuters on rail, bus and auto to pay $670 Million of the $1.2 Million gap with the balance to come from the MTA’s own cost-cutting. Schumer said the possible $400 Million from the $2 Billion operations stimulus would not cover all the fare increases proposed, but would ease the pain. The fares introduced two weeks ago would not go into effect until June. About $300 Million more in savings would be achieved by the MTA eliminating 3,200 positions and the rest in service cuts.


Nowhere in the official MTA release on meeting the budget does it say that they have cut out planned projects along the three lines mentioned by the congressmen today.


Track Improvements, Station Amenities, Parking Projects to be Funded if…


The projects covered by today’s announcement of the $4 Billion New York stimulus pacakage include the upgrading of interiors, track design, additional parking facilities along the three lines in addition to purchase of new railroad cars, locomotives and hybrid buses that have simply been not been executed by the MTA because they have not been considered a priority, though that is not clear at this time.


 Schumer, told the media these are projects the MTA has put on hold due to their present $1.2 Billion budget shortfall. Two weeks ago, the MTA announced a series of fare hikes of 23% to wipe out half that $1.2 Billion deficit, with service cuts and 3,200 layoffs taking care of the rest of it.


The MTA apparently did not feel capital for capital  projects was a problem nine months ago.  


At that time, MTA announced a massive expansion plan going out to 2050, with no indication of any capital projects left unfunded. Since that time according to The Daily News, the MTA revenues from transit-dedicated taxes on property sales and corporate profits have declined dramatically.


How the Stimulus Works: Construction Workers to Get Westchester Rolling Again.


“We are fighting to make sure Westchester and the lower part of the Hudson Valley get a big slice of that ($4 Billion Mass Transit stimulus)funding,” Schumer said. ” Funds could be released immediately for improvements at stations across Westchester County and the lower Hudson Valley and as we know it’s a very perilous time for the MTA. The agency faces a budget gap that threatens to cripple the entire system. The financial crisis has forced the entire MTA to cut back and take draconian steps across the board. So to try and close the budget gap the MTA this month approved a budget that had all kinds of bad things and one of the things they did was to delay all kinds of capital projects. The budget has Metro North rail and busriders in its crosshairs.”


Schumer said that President-Elect Obama has “wisely said we’ve got to get this economy going. We’re in a recession and we have to pump money into the economy. He’s also said that the first place we should put money into the economy is infrastructure. That makes sense. If you just put money into the economy, then thank God the economy recovers, you don’t have anything to show for it. If you put it into infrastructure at the end of the day, and let’s hope the economy recovers quickly, you’ll have something a lot of good to show . Congressman Hall and I are among the leaders, talking regularly to the Obama Transition Team.


‘I’ve been talking regularly as has the congressman that mass transit be included. That we not only do the traditional infrastructure such as roads, bridges and sewers, which are very much needed in Westchester County, but we also include mass transit in terms of infrastructure. I’ve been largely successful in persuading them that mass transit should be a part of the package and it looks like the number will be $20 Billion around the country for mass transit. Now when that happens New York does very well. We have more mass transit riders than any other state. Usually we get a fifth of the money….The mass transit stimulus is not a done deal, but it’s looking very good. New York State should get around $4 Billion, and Westchester and the lower Hudson Valley will get a big chunk of that money as well.”


Helps Build Strong Recovery 3 Ways


Schumer said this would benefit the MTA and the area three ways: increasing  quality and efficiency of service; help the MTA cope with its budget problems and the money would “prime the pump, with thousands of construction workers putting their money into stores, restaurants and getting the economy going at a difficult time. So it’s a win-win-win.”


Schumer noted that  the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials reports that for every $1 Billion invested in federal highway and transit infrastructure, an estimated 47,000 jobs are created and an estimated $5.7 Billion in economic activity is generated.


Schumer and the Governor Cherry Picking Projects


Schumer’s news release said he was working closely with Governor Patterson’s office to determine these projects. The North White Plains railroad station is included, but no projects at this time take place within the White Plains city limits.


Schumer announced that projects that would be undertaken if the $4 Billion he envisioned for New York would come through are


·         Station improvements at Tarrytown, Croton-Harmon and Peekskill railroad stations.


·         Priority parking repairs at Metro-North stations in Westchester, Putnam and Dutchess Counties


·         Reconstruction of the Port Jervis station to crate a double-track.


·         Power and substation improvements on Harlem and Hudson lines to increase reliability of service.


·         Purchase of new railcars, built in upstate New York.


·         Improved Metro-North Station Facilities, including ticket offices, waiting areas, rest rooms, concessions, customer service.


 


Why not Done Before?


 



 


WPCNR asked Mr. Hall after the news conference about the necessity for such what appear to be at first glance on-the-surface cosmetic improvements with (the exceptions being  the double-tracking project and the rolling stock), Congressman Hall told WPCNR that the projects were needed to encourage the use of the facilities and move more persons to mass transit. He also said he supported construction of a tunnel under the Hudson for a direct rail link from Rockland County to Grand Central.


 


Reporters asked Senator Schumer whether the Tappan Zee Bridge would be included, and Schumer said that it was not “shovel-ready” and that the area had to decide what it wanted to do with the bridge. WPCNR notes the New York State Department of Transportation has decided in favor of building a new bridge with Bus Rapid Transit across Westchester and a rail link across the new bridge, connecting with the Hudson Metro North line. A public private partnership is now being explored by the Governor’s Office.


Schumer said he and Hall are working the Obama transition team to have projects which could be started in 180 days included on the Mass Transit stimulus menu.


No Separate Aid Package from Washington for Education at this time.


WPCNR asked Senator Schumer if he expected another effort of the government to steer education funds  to New York to  avert Governor Patterson’s cuts to education proposed two weeks ago, and avoid unprecedented property tax increases enacted by school districts.


Senator Schumer said, no, that  he anticipated increases in New York’s Medicaid reimbursements (currently 50% on the dollar), to  free up New York funds that then could be used by the Governor and the legislature to fund education, providing relief from the present budget crisis the state faces.


It is interesting to look back and remember Louis Cappelli’s Station Plaza project that proposed a 21st Century railroad transit and bus complex, to replace the current, alleged delapidated Metro North White Plains Station, plus five 50 story buildings including a hotel which was rejected by the Common Council in 2007. This would have fit the bill nicely  and would have been ready to go by now possibly,  had the Common Council granted Mr. Cappelli the designated developer status he sought in 2007. Mr. Cappelli was a little too early apparently with his vision.

Posted in Uncategorized

Council OKS 12Hr Police Patrols; 24Hr Fire Shifts. On Genda Jan 5

Hits: 0

 


WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE-EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey. December 29, 2008: The Common Council gave their blessing to a historic change in White Plains Department of Public Safety Work Rules Monday evening, agreeing to implement 12-Hour Patrol Tours for 72 Police patrol force and 24-hour tours of duty for fire fighters. The work rule changes are expected to save about $60,000 outright in overtime for police and firefighters combined based on the unions giving up being paid overtime for the time they spend being trained. 



Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety Daniel Jackson,(head of conference table), and Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety John Cullom, (seated left) assuring the Common Council of the sources of savings in overtime on the new work rules Monday evening. White Plains Firefighters fill the entrance to the chamber, observing the action.


The measure will be in effect for a one year experimental period beginning January 1, 2009.  The Mayor secured the Council agreement to put the work rule changes for both departments on the agenda for the January 5 Common Council meeting.



The pay rate of the new police and fire contracts is the only sticking point being negotiated.  Paul Wood, City Executive Officer, (above behind Mayor Joseph Delfino),  said the unions and the city are far apart on hammering out the wage terms of the contract at this time.


Technically, the unions and the city have until June 30 to negotiate the wage portion of the contract. Originally, the contract rejected the pay increases  December 18 after the raises were presented to them in Executive Session four weeks previously, at which time they did not object strenuously to a schedule that called for raises of 3.75%, 4% and 4%. Pundits, observers of the political scene, have wondered since that time why the council would let a contract come to a vote they did not agree with in the first place.



 The Common Council in a surprise move two weeks ago  surprised the police and fire unions by rejecting the contracts, 5-2, when they met  at a Special Meeting to approve the negotiated contracts calling for 3.75%, 4% and 4% raises across the board for both police and fire. The five Council members voting down the contract ( Benjamin Boykin, Milagros Lecuona, Rita Malmud, Dennis Power and Thomas Roach)  rejected the pay schedule for the first year of the contract due to a sudden concern they had developed  on the amount of the first year increase due to the economic conditions.  


Councilman Glen Hockley and Mayor Delfino voted to approve the contract. This concern on the part of the other five developed over the four weeks between when they essentially agreed to the contracts during executive session (including the work rules given the council apparent approval Monday evening), and the date they rejected the contract December 18.


With Mr. Roach attending via speakerphone, Ms. Malmud, Mr. Boykin, Ms. Lecuona, and Mr. Power attending Monday evening night  (Councilman Glen Hockley was not in attendance), the council asked a few more questions about the work hours segment of the agreement, which they could have asked during the Executive Session when the tentative contracts were first presented two months ago. The meeting lasted about 35 minutes with about 20 White Plains firefighters looking over the Councilpersons’ shoulders.


 


The Mayor pointed out that the 24 hour Tour the firefighters had agreed to was the standard for 73% of fire departments across the country. In addition, he pointed out the police and fire unions willingness to give up overtime pay for training, was worth “10s of thousands of dollars to the city.”



Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety Daniel Jackson, (right above) speaking for Commissioner Dr. Frank Straub (who is on vacation this week), said currently the Department has to pay 24 hours overtime to firefighters and police who are undergoing special training (citing Weapons of Mass Destruction training held in Alabama by the Department of Homeland Security).


The fire and police unions have consented to waive that overtime, he said as part of the new work rules.  This saving in training overtime alone would save $20,000 to $30,000 in overtime and allow more firefighters to be sent out for training, Jackson said. Jackson said the firefighters had agreed to give 20 hours back which created the saving in the training piece.


Jackson said the new rules for both firefighters and police will be in effect for one year, and if issues come up they will be discussed, and ironed out and that either side could opt out with 60 days notice. He said in remarks that the department and the unions have a close relationship and issues would be addressed as they came up in the one year implementation of the new 12 and 24 hour tours. The schedules if approved January 5 are in the process of being developed over the next week.



 Asked by Councilman Dennis Power if the arithmetic worked, Mayor Delfino said “I wouldn’t be sitting here now if I didn’t think it was. I applaud the administration of public safety. It is a great concession (on the part of the unions).”


Councilperson Rita Malmud asked about where the overtime savings came about in the 12-hour police patrol tours and the 24-hour fire tours.


Commissioner Jackson said that there was one less shift change (going to two shift changes a day with the police), rather than 3 which created he said, a 50% saving, but not having to pay overtime at the change of a shift.  Currently police patrols are on 8 hours, he pointed out, and by shifting to 12-hour tours for patrol only, the department eliminates one whole shift.


The second savings in overtime comes with the firefighters and police waiving the overtime for training sessions out of the district.


Councilman Benjamin Boykin asked what if firefighters got sick across the 24-hour period they were on duty. Jackson said the fire department would fill in with staff to replace the men rather than call in on overtime, and further fallback position would be that a piece of equipment would not be activated if the department did not have the men to man it. Jackson said the fire department contract does not require mandatory overtime so the department is able to cover shifts with staff when firefighters are unable to report.


Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety John Cullom said the department with the overtime concession by the fire union meant the department could train more men for less money.


Cullom, asked by Councilperson Lecuona if any fire departments had eliminated the 24 hour shift after switching to, said he has never heard of a department that went to 24-hour shifts and went back to shorter shifts.


Tom Roach, speaking by phone said he saw “no downside” to the agreement if it would “help employees,” and said if it  (the 12 and 24 hour tours) would be “good for morale, I’m all for it.”


Straub Prototype Paved Way


Paul Wood explained to WPCNR that the police 12-hour tours would involve only the patrol force. He said the police at Dr. Frank Straub’s suggestion had already run a prototype 12-hour shift for patrols two years ago, and based on that experience and the overtime savings Straub saw, the Department worked out the 12-hour shift with the PBA. 


Wood said computer models had been made comparing overtime with regular 8 hour patrols compared to the experimental 12 hour shifts showing significant savings (in addition to the $20,000 to $30,000 in training overtime savings). Asked if the Department of Public Safety would make those studies public after the contract  was approved (on the hour shifts), Wood said he might.

Posted in Uncategorized

Superintendent Invites Leaders of Hoods for creative Suggestions on New Budget

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. December 29, 2008: The outgoing Superintendent of Schools, Timothy Connors, who will be leaving the district in six months, has sent a letter to neighborhood associations in White Plains inviting them to participate in the January 15 first Community Forum on the 2009-2010 school budget, predicted by WPNCR to exceed $200 Million, if the present rate of spending is maintained. 



Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors invites Neighborhood Associations to craft the School Budget. Here is the Text of the Superintendent’s message:


December 23, 2008


 


 


 


 


Dear Neighborhood Association President:


 


We are writing to you, as a community leader, to tell you of our plans for development of the 2009-10 budget and to invite your participation in the process.


 


Due to the unprecedented economic situation we feel this year calls for a new approach. We hope to involve the broader community and solicit their input, in order to enable us to develop an effective, responsible budget for the 2009-10 school year, which the public will support in the May 19th vote.


 


We plan to hold two Communitywide Forums, inviting all residents to participate in roundtable discussions, in small groups, which we hope will result in creative suggestions to realize savings and increase revenues.  It is clear that we need to explore all options. 


 


Please plan to join us at the first Forum on Thursday, January 15th, in the B-1 Room at White Plains High School.  We hope you will also encourage friends, neighbors and constituents to come out on the 15th as well.  We’d like to hear as many voices as possible.


 


Thank you for your interest in the past and we hope you will continue to participate in school district affairs.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Council to Hear Advantages of Police/Fire Work Shifts Tonight

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE EXAMINER. December 29, 2008: At a Special Meeting this evening called Friday by city hall, the Common Council will hear the Commissioner ofPublic Safety discuss the advantages to the police and fire departments of the proposed new shifts in the Police and Fire contracts now under consideration. The meeting takes place at City Hall at 5:30 P.M.


 


WPCNR in checking on the 12-hour shift situation for police around the country in a random, but by no


means exhaustive internet check, found that, according to a survey of 300 police departments with


over 50 sworn members made by The Police Foundation in November of 2005,  the most-employed


shift length was the 8-hour shift with 40%. Larger agencies (101 to 200 members) employed the 10-


hour shift  with the 8-hour shift used as often (32%) as the 10-hour shift. The 12-hour shift was “most


likely to be implemented in smaller agencies (under 100 officers, more than 50 officers).


 


 



 


A total of 28.5% of smaller agencies surveyed adopted 12-hour schedules. Only 19.5% of the mid-


sized (101 to 200 officers) and 15% of departments surveyed with over 200 officers had adopted the


12-hour  shifts.  The survey found 8-hour shifts are most common across all agency types. In the survey


of 287 departments, 58.5% were smaller departments (50 and 100 sworn officers); 28.6% were from


mid-sized (101 TO 200 sworn officers).. and 14% were large agencies (201 sworn members or more).


 


According to an article published this fall by the Police Officers Association of Michigan, 12-hour shifts


with adequate gaps in rotations from nights to days, do not result in fatigue factor at the end of the 12-


hour shift, a factor often feared in shifts to  12-hour tours. The article quotes a survey of the Louisiana


State Police which found


 


“12-hour shifts improve morale and family life. Police officers who work the 12-hoursift generally spend


more time with their families; have more time and energy to perform routine tasks or larger projects


outside of work. Every other weekend off allows them to conduct long-range planning and more time


for recreation. A vast majority of spouses also reported overall satisfaction with the 12-hour schedule


(note – only 50% of officers have to work the holiday on 12-hour shifts, versus 75% under an 8-hour


system). It should be noted that there have been no insurmountable problems reported in implementing


a 12-hour schedule.”


 


The Michigan Police Officers Association reports that the 12-hour shift reduces sick leave, stating,  “sick hours tend to drop a


nominal amount,  the number of incidents (happening on a shift), decreased substantially more.  Surveys indicate that sick leave


has increased when fast rotating (12-hour) shifts are scheduled. “ 


 


The article advises a straight  12-hour shift for several weeks allows physiological adjustment and result in a larger


 decrease in the mount of sick leave.


Increases Officer Count.


The Michigan association found that “decreases in annual and sick leave affords more available


manpower, which can assist departments that have experienced a decrease in personnel through


attrition.”


The Michagan Police Association found that the 12-hour schedule helps  officers handle second jobs


better without affecting their police performance:  “Police officers suffer extremely early burnout and


struggle with scheduling problems. One reason is because many of them typically use their off time to


moonlight. Twelve-hour schedules are improving this situation and making scheduling of hours at their


second job more convenient.”


Officers Love the 12-Hour Shift.


The love of the 12-hour schedule is found on comments on the 12-hour schedules on various police blogs, to wit:


From a Chicago suburban officer: 


In my opinion the 12 hour shifts are great. It can be a long night especially with overtime but the time off is great. How our schedule works. This weekend I work Friday, Saturday, Sunday, off on Mon, Tues, work Wed, Thur, Off on Friday, Sat, Sun. Every other weekend is a three day weekend. Its great for time off and doing other things. It’s also nice if there is overtime available especially for a whole shift. 12 hours of OT is a nice bit of change in my pocket. The way the time works out every 6 weeks we are owed 12 hours back. We can take it as R/T (reclaim time) or just as a day off (we call it a Kelly Day, KDO) This schedule works out great. A perfect example is this let’s say it’s your short work week. You are only working Wed,Thur, so you have a KDO on Wed and burn a day of vacation on Thursday. Now you have 7 days off and only burned one day of vacation! I cant say enough good things about the 12 hour shifts.


From a police officer in Ohio:


“Used to work 12’s. Personally, I liked it better than 8’s or 10’s (which I’ve also worked). Our schedule was one where you had a three day weekend off every other week. It made for a long weekend on (three 12’s in a row on the weekend is a long shift), but you never had more than two days on in a row otherwise.”

The biggest downside to 12’s is the fact that you don’t have much time to do anything on the days you work. I tended to come home, eat, and go right to bed so I could get up for the next shift. The extra days off tend to balance that out, though.”


Another Ohio officer:


As previously stated, 12s can be great because of the time off. Our department is currently on 12s and we are going through a change of command (our chief left and we are in limbo awaiting a replacement). The mayor is a retired chief of police and he advocates for 8 hour shifts. This has the department in an uproar because the guys love the 12s.

I’m used to working long shifts at my current full time gig so 12s don’t bother me. But, it does make for a long day if you have court/get stuck over on something and the overtime adds up quick.

I’ve never worked 10s but I think they would be a good median between the 8s or 12s. IMHO 8s are not efficient. You go out on something good and when you clear your shift could be more than half over.


From Louisiana:


every 2 weeks we rotate from days to nights and back,think of it this way you only work 7 days every 2 weeks so technically you only work 1/2 a year love it…”



Management Talks


Captain Jon Sundermeier, Lincoln, Nebraska, Police Department, notes the advantages from a management perspective, writing in Police Chief Magazine gave a perspective on the 12-hour shift. The LPD has 300 sworn officers and serves a city of 230,000 persons. White Plains has about 200 officers and serves a city of 57,000 by night, 200,000 by day. The Captain writes:


One advantage of the 12-hour shift is that it provides excellent coverage during peak times—typically late afternoon and evening and on into the early morning hours on weekends. A day shift and a night shift provide basic coverage for 24 hours, while another group of officers is scheduled from early afternoon to early morning hours. Staggered start times allow for constant coverage at the beginning and end of shifts. Although it is possible to build a schedule that provides similar coverage with 8- or 10-hour shifts, or a combination of both, the result is usually more complicated and unwieldy.


The captain finds that sick leave use initially decreased, but by the end of 2006, it had climbed back to ”slightly more than the average of 1,912 hours used by the same police team in the three previous years.”


He writes: “Some of the departments that the LPD contacted while planning implementation of the new shifts reported an overall decrease, but this was not the case in the first year of implementation in Lincoln.” He cautions that the test group of 12% of the work force meant you could not draw “meaningful conclusions” about sick leave from the trial.


The 12-hour shift has been touted by the City of White Plains as a significant way of decreasing police overtime.


Lincoln Police report that there was no significant drop in overtime, but saw significant trends in three areas: a decrease in overtime taken as time off; an almost  50% increase in overtime for court and a 51% decrease in the amount of overtime paid to complete reports.


Captain Sundenmeir gives it high marks: “The employee survey also indicates that 12-hour shifts have a mitigating effect on the negative aspects of shift work. Officers report being more rested and ready to return to work after days off but also note there is little time for anything but work during their work days. A more scientific approach might provide more conclusive data, but the survey and employee comments suggest that in addition to being happier, 12-hour shift workers are probably healthier as well. “


The captain puts this in perspective: “Before implementation, the main concern was whether 12-hour shifts would have a negative impact on the quality of the service provided by the department. Objective data suggest that it does not. There was no negative fiscal impact, and a trend toward less sick leave use was noted.”


To read the Captain’s full report, WPCNR directs you to http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&article_id=1435&issue_id=32008


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Tell the City Leaders What You Consider Important

Hits: 0

WPCNR VOICE OF MR. AND MRS. AND MS. WHITE PLAINS. December 27, 2008: In the interest in focusing on issues as the city enters 2008, the economy and the alarming increase in property taxes that city residents face in the coming year, have created some issues that the city and the school district leaders perhaps should be paying more than lip service.


I have isolated a few of them at the right, and offer them up to get the public take on them. Simply vote in terms of priority in your mind. The issues should purely be considered from what would White Plains benefit the most from to keep the city “moving forward” as our officials love to say as an excuse for not doing anything about disturbing trends.  You may vote for more than one issue, voting once each day.


Here they are:


REMOVE THE GEDNEY DUMP CANCER-CAUSING TOXINS NO MATTER WHAT– According to the Department of Environmental Conservation, the DEC has determined that White Plains is going to have to remediate the TCE carcinogens leaking into the Mamaroneck River.


The form of that remediation has not been decided yet, but the key decision has been made, it has to be cleaned up. City officials have ignored this problem since 1976 when first discovered. Should the TCE’s be removed anyway, regardless of whether the DEC is lenient in determining the scope of their remediation?


Cut the City Budget 5% ($8 Million) — As pointed out exclusively by WPCNR in the last week, the city, school and county property taxes are escalating to where persons living on incomes not pacing the 4% city tax increase of last year, are rapidly having their taxes outpace their growth in income. If they are on fixed incomes and own homes, more could be at risk of defaulting on their mortgages. 


The rate of tax increase for a median home in White Plains for city and schools approaching $2,000 to $2,500 increased taxes a year in 2008-2009  (In five years this will amount to your paying $10,000 more in taxes over what you pay now if the present budgets kept on their meandering 4%, 7% a year increases.


Should the city cut its budget by 5%  ($8 Million)? A former Executive Officer of the City of White Plains estimated that for every $1 Million in expenses the tax rate would have to go up 3%. An $8 Million cut  would result in an 25% reduction in city taxes.


Cut the School Budget 5% ($9.2 Million)– It is intriguing that the School District is eliminating the Annual Budget Committee review of their budget this year and calling just two public forums to have the public participate in forming the budget. This is like having callers to WFAN manage the New York sports teams. This should be an interesting exercise. 


As a target, would the city citizens want a 5% budget cut (a mere $9.2 Million), which would enable the district to keep the budget under $190 Million? That would cut the school tax increase (at the current rate of spending to less than a $100, instead of the $500 increase you received this year if you owned a $700,000 home. It is a target.


Lower Parking Rates. Extend Meter Time Limits. Lower Fines — We, those trapped in White Plains, are used to the Draconian conversion of the Department of Parking into a profit center. Should the rates lower a little to 50 cents an hour instead of a dollar an hour? With higher ticket rates? Should it all be reexamined in light of a shrinking economy? Would lower parking keep White Plainsians shopping in White Plains instead of going to Port Chester where my wife is now, shopping with her daughter? Would citizens respond to lower rates? Or should we keep them where they are? Raising them is another possibility to lower taxes. But the question here is, should they be lowered. If you agree vote in poll at the right.


City Takeover of Illegal Housing Sites — The city has paid lip service to the illegal, overcrowded tenement houses owned by modern day Uriah Heeps, Dickensian  flouters of zoning laws, apparently allowed to exist because many of them may be major political contributors to both parties.


Should the city, when a landlord’s property is found to be in violation of housing standards, initiate a takeover of the property, compensating the landlord for the property but taking it over and becoming the landlord? The landlord of course, being paid the assessed value of the house? It would assure that residents would not be gouged and landlords be deprived of their ill-gotten profits off the poor. What does Mr. and Mrs. White Plains think? Of course, political contributions would decline.


EXAMINE OVERCROWDING OF WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOM, Bring in Greenwich Hospital Expertise, New Facility.— Due to obviously misguided efforts by the health officials, allowing  the closing of  United Hospital in Port Chester and St. Agnes Hospital as losing money, White Plains Hospital Medical Center has been embarking on a never-ending expansion program to handle the health load.


This has been good for White Plains Hospital but possibly not so good for sick persons. 


 This has created perpetual crowding at the E.R., plus longer ambulance runs from surrounding communities. Should the city work to involve Greenwich Hospital in splitting the emergency room load or establishing a Westchester satellite Emergency room closer to White Plains?  Many White Plains and surrounding communities choose Greenwich Hospital for ambulatory and elective procedures. Why not ease the White Plains Hospital Medical Center crowding with a plan instead of an expansion into a mega-emergency room that will probably not be able to handle the patient load when completed?


Establish City Commuter Tax — The city is desperate for revenue with sales taxes softening perhaps due to the economy.  There is also a definite possibility that the assessments will be down this year causing a catastrophic loss in assessed property. Last year it was even, thanks to the last gasp of the housing market boom.


Real estate is down 10% in White Plains this year. IF assessments decline10%,  this will be a disaster from a property tax standpoint. The last time the city assessments dropped approximating 10% was in 1994-1995 when assessments dropped 8.1% from $390 Million to $359 Million.


Last year the city assessments were $290.2 Million. A  10% drop with mean a $30 Million drop in assessments  to $260 Million. 


This would cause the school district to raise their tax rate to $560/ $1,000 of Assessed Value, from $503/$1,000 of Assessed Value this year to generate the same $145 Million in property taxes they’re receiving this year on their $184.4 Million Budget. They raise that one dime, and the increase per thousand will be more. This would mean that Lloyd Tasch, the city assessor becomes the most important man in White Plains over the next 35 days.  (All the more reason to cut the rate of growth dramatically in the 2009-2010 School Budget.) 


As a perpetual revenue shot, should the city install a commuter surcharge payable to the city by persons working in White Plains who are not residents? With a population we are told that swells by several hundred thousand during the workday a $100 a year Commuter Tax on 150,000 workers living outside of White Plains would generate  $15,000,000. A $200 Year Commuter Tax, $30 Million. This could be split with the School District. Should this be explored?


Establish Commercial Services Tax to Penalize Certiorari Filings — Because a separate Commerical Tax Rate legislation proposed by Assemblyman Adam Bradley has been stalled in Albany, because the senate will not pass it, according to Mr. Bradley and State Senator Suzi Oppenheimer. 


The city might consider, as Polk County Tennessee has done in dealing with unfairly low assessed properties on government lands, imposing a Commercial Services Surcharge across all businesses and business loaners in the city, with the option of increasing it to deal with new certirorari settlements affecting the tax rate.


Should the city examine this as a remedy to pay for services that are provided the business community with revenues from property taxes, when property taxes are artificially lowered by equalization rates.  The first CSS (Commercial Services Surcharge) could be imposed in 2009-2010 to counteract the certiorari excesses of previous years — the vast amount of which have been reaped by some of the largest most successful properties in the city.


Increase City Sales Tax Another 1/4% — The Mayor has said he plans to ask Albany for the extra 1/4% in sales tax that Assemblyman Adam Bradley refused to go for in the legislature last year. Mr. Bradley balked at going for a full 1/2% as the Mayor had asked.  Should the city go for this, it would mean about $6 Million for the city. The Mayor estimates it as $10 Million, but WPCNR sees that as over optimistic. Still $6 Million is not small change. Shall we tell Mr. Bradley to go for it for White Plains?


Televise All Common Council Meetings/ Special Meetings and Work Sessions — Should the Common Council introduce a resolution to assure that all their meetings are televised or electronically available on the internet  (as they are in progressive cities like Fort Lauderdale, Florida)? (And of course provide the technology upgrades to do so?


Establish Fines for Political Action Committees’ Failure to Disclose the candidates campaigns that benefited from PAC-raised money — the Democratic Party suit agains the Year 2001 Committee to get them to disclose what candidates received their funds in the past years  is coming to a head with Judge Francis Nicolai ordering the committee to open their books (whatever that means). Should the Common Council introduce City Charter Legislation fining political action committees restrictive penalties for failure to disclose recipients  and accounts of how their money was spent for candidates up for city election — prior to election day?


Establish Relief, Marketing Plan, Credit Loosening for City Real Estate Market — Though White Plains realtors say the White Plains market is holding its own, the advantages of White Plains are now more critical than ever to point out to homebuyers. Should the city embark on a monetary relief plan to aid realtors hurt by the real estate market downturn, apply pressure on banks in the city to star credit moving out to White Plains homebuyers, and start a publicity campaign touting White Plains real estate value?

Posted in Uncategorized

Cablevision Virus Strikes White Plains Cable again on Channel 76

Hits: 0

WPCNR WIRE. December 26, 2008: The  sketchy quality of video and hard-to-hear static audio problems that have been plaguing Cablevision public access telecasting on Channel 76 returned again Friday evening, making the audio hard to hear without the customer turning up their standard cable set to full full. Reception on Hi-Definition via Optimum was better, but hum in the audio still persisted.


Cablevision and the City of White Plains have been without an operating contract for three years, relieving Cablevision of paying an annual stipend for technical improvements to the station. Cablevision continues to pay the city per subscriber,.


 The ongoing reception problems on Cablevision  have resulted in Cablevision technical personnel making adjustments to station equipment and their own equipment for weeks, but the problem continues to persist appearing again Friday evening. Neither the Cable station nor Cablevision has been able to fix the problem.


 The Cable Commission is set to take up a contract with a vendor to rewire the station’s control board, however, other technical experts familiar with the problem believe the problem lies in what happens to the Studio signal once it is sent to Cablevision, which routes it to Mamaroneck then back up to White Plains. A young man on duty at White Plains cable Friday evening reported to WPCNR the audio and video on White Plains Week was fine going out of the station, which would indicate it is what Cablevision is doing to the Cable signal is causing the problem.It has been going on intermittently for about three years, and had gotten increasingly worse in the late fall. The muffled bass audio and very blurry video were also prevalent on the Beyond the Game program aired after 9 P.M. Friday evening.


The problem continues to persist.


White Plains Week however may be seen in its entirety with crystal clear video and sharp audio on the internet at http://www.whiteplainsweek.com.

Posted in Uncategorized