Hits: 0
WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT. From the Mayor’s Office. February 5, 2009: Mayor Joseph Delfino issued a statement today denying he runs a closed administration and asserts the Common Council should have been aware the city was facing a deficit based on meetings with the council the last two months. The statement was made in response to Common Council Presiddent Benjamin Boykin’s interview with WPCNR Wednesay, where Councilman Boykin protested that the council had never been officially briefed on the size of the deficit which was estimated in a front-page article in The Journal News Wednesday morning.
Mayor Delfino, in his written statement expanded his remarks to criticise the Common Council for rejecting projects that could have been building now, and for raising the sales tax last year only 1/4% instead of the full 1/2% the Mayor requested. The Mayor blamed the council for shrinking the Reserve for Financing in approving the budget last spring.
The Mayor’s statement comes after WPCNR has been informed just this afternoon that Adam Bradley, widely expected to run for Mayor next year, will not be the City Committee choice to run for Mayor, and that Councilman Benjamin Boykin is currently the Democrat being groomed to run for Mayor, according to informed sources. Wednesday, Councilman Boykin informed WPCNR when asked if he was running for Mayor, said it was too early to consider that.
Here is the Mayor’s Statement:
Statement From Mayor Joseph Delfino Issued Thursday Afternoon
In my 2004 State of the City address, I closed by addressing the Common Council with these words: “One thing I have noticed in my six years as Mayor is that when we unite behind a common cause, we get things done…I would encourage each and every one of you to stay focused on our joint objectives without being distracted by the same handful of partisans who prefer political infighting and animosity over progress”
Unfortunately, over the last several years, we seen the deterioration of any effort to join together on the Council, particularly in these most difficult economic times, and instead resort to shameful partisan politics to the detriment of the
To say that we are a closed or insular administration could not be further from the truth. It was my administration that initiated regular work sessions for the Common Council and Citizens to be Heard. Additionally, I have probably appointed more Democrats to Boards and Commissions than Republicans.
I cannot, for the life of me, understand how Council President Boykin can claim that he was unaware that the City would be running a deficit this year. Last Thursday, January 29, Mr. Boykin received the Second Quarter Interim Financial Report, as did the rest of the Common Council, which clearly showed the City was running approximately $4.5 million behind where we were at the same time last year. This trend, which we fully expect to continue, would indicate that we will need to use nearly $9 million of our allocated fund balance. It’s as clear as day.
Additionally, it has been well documented on your web site as well as the Journal News, that I have asked each department to reduce expenditures by 7%. Based on our current budget of $160 million this would equate to $11 million in savings. Also several articles in the Journal News in January on the Library budget cuts and in an interview on your web site on January 9, administration officials clearly expressed the fact that the City would most assuredly run a deficit.
At a briefing in October, the last request the Council asked to be briefed on the current financial situation, The City’s Finance Commissioner, rightfully told the Council that most projections at that point in time were on target except sales tax which she then estimated would be running approximately $1 million behind projections. In addition, she as well as I, myself cautioned that we had extreme concerns about all our revenue projections and that the administration would be taking to steps to reduce expenses.
The Budget and Advisory Committee is an advisory board to the Mayor and is charged with long term financial planning and is not intended to micromanage current budgets.
Councilman Boykin has been reminded of this numerous times.
Councilwoman Lecuona was removed from the Cable Commission, not as retribution, as they claim, but for the reason that the directive under which the Commission was formed, clearly states that an elected official should not be on the Commission. Why did I wait? I was hopeful she would resign, as former Councilman Larry Delgado did following his election to the Common Council. I tried, subtly, to get the message to her by handing out a copy of the guidelines for the Commission and by appearing at a Commission meeting to reiterate the point. When it was clear that she would not willingly go, I had no choice but to remove her. Mr. Boykin may share a similar conflict by chairing the Budget Advisory Committee. Last year, the Advisory Committee, in a written report fully supported the one half percent sales tax increase which I had proposed. Mr. Boykin as Council President did not support the increase and voted instead to reduce it to a quarter percent. The $5 to $6 million this would have generated this year will be sorely missed and would have gone a long way in reducing the pain that our City employees and taxpayers will feel.
At Budget Adoption, without consulting me or anyone in my administration, under Council President Boykin’s leadership, the council voted to reduce the budget by 1% including a critical cut to the City’s Reserve for Financing, the only contingency fund the City has in times of emergency. I warned them all at the time that the measures they were implementing were dangerous and would likely cause the City to run a deficit and harm our bond rating. As I said then, “it might be the politically expedient thing to do, but that it was irresponsible and detrimental to
For political reasons, this current Council has fumbled away five major proposals, which as a requirement under our RFQ were all fully-financeable at the time, to redevelop the train station area which would have created hundreds of jobs and provided millions of dollars in building permit fees and other revenues to the City, voted to reduce the sales tax increase from one half to one quarter percent, 90% of which would have come from people who live outside the City, and which now will cost our property taxpayers $5 to $6 million in revenue, and slashed the reserve for financing line in our budget in a time of unprecedented financial turmoil.
To bring it back to the question of where’s Ben been? He claims in yesterday’s statement that he wasn’t briefed. Where was he when all these meetings and briefings and articles were presented? My answer to that question would be that he’s most likely been out worrying about his political career to the detriment of the
To throw up red herrings, try to deflect responsibility or bury your head in the sand at this time is not what is needed. What is needed is for leadership to take action to protect our property taxpayers and our employees in this difficult period. I will be announcing, later today, a list of actions my administration will be taking to undertake the difficult tasks before us. I would ask for support, not politicking, during this most turbulent time.






