Hits: 0
WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey November 6, 2010:
As first reported by WPCNR Friday evening, the Common Council shocked Mayor Adam Bradley and his administration by voting to table an Environmental Resolution backing the environmental viability of the city taking over and running the Ridgeway Country Club, 6 to 1. They voted 6 to 1 to table the acquisition and improvement Project approved Thursday afternoon by the Capital Projects Board in Executive Session.
They then voted 6 to 1 to table the financing of $15 Million in bonds to enable the Mayor to bid on the Ridgeway Country Club by Tuesday, the suddenly surfaced “deadline” promulgated by the country club. (Previously when WPCNR repeatedly asked the city if there was a deadline, we were told no.) All three measures were tabled to December 6, the next public meeting of the Common Council.
Tom Roach, the Common Council President, said the council did so because a second feasibility study of the project requested by the Common Council, executed by NGF Consulting of Jupiter Florida did not paint such a positive scenario of the project as did the administration consultants, Greenwich Golf Group. Roach said the NGF study questioned the revenues from swimming, the number of rounds projected, and noted Lake Isle Country Club and Rye Golf Club, the two municipally run golf courses cited by the study the Mayor’s Administration as models on how White Plains would run the course had not made money the last two years. Roach also said he was reluctant to add public employees to the payroll to staff the Ridgeway Country Club given the projected increase in city pension fund contributions (3 to 4%) it will have to pay to the state next budget year.
Coumcilman David Buchwald said the possibility of the city acquiring the club is not dead, that he would hope the Ridgeway Country Club might approach the city once bids are in Tuesday. Buchwald said the council requested the second study, and Councilperson Beth Smayda suggested the consultant. The administration agreen to pay the $15,000 cost for NGF Consulting to execute the council study to date. Roach said the council needed a more detailed feasibility study examining the flaws the NGF group found and suggested more detailed work be done. Apparently the council wants NGF consulting to do a further study
Sources speaking to WPCNR under condition of anonymity told WPCNR at no time did the Common Council express any intention to the administration that they were not going to vote to authorize the bid from the first Executive Session October 4 when the Council was present with the overall city plan to acquire the club.
Mayor Bradley when he called the votes appeared to be taken aback by the three consecutive “Table” votes.
The NGF Study–made public on the city website sometime this week on the city website does note questions about golf growth nationally, the soft years Lake Isle and Rye Golf Club have had, and questions about the estimate of the rounds and the kind of management of the club.
However, the original city financial model originally presented the council does note, (in extensive admissions charges for different categories of patrons) contrary to what the NGF study says, that there will be resident and non-resident members for golf only and for golf, swimming and tennis, as well as walk up traffic. The city intent was to run the club as a resident and non-residential club and also general admissions, that is clearly in the financial model. If the council did not like that they should have said at the time.
At no time did the council members voting to table last night express that they were not for the proposal publicly.
Councilman Buchwald told this reporter that approving the measures Friday night would be giving the administration “a blank check.” However, the Common Council could have easily prevented this by demanding as part of the legislation “with the approval of the Common Council.”
The proposal the administration presented to the Council which they have had for a month, was always described as “conceptual” by the administration.
The tabling gives the opportunity for the city perhaps to get the club at a lower price, as Buchwald suggested. But, it puts the city at the mercy of Ridgeway Country Club.
NGF Consulting did have positive comments about the Greenwich Golf Group “Golf Market Feasibility Review:”
“Our review of the consultant’s feasibility analysis revealed the study methedology was sound and that the consultant clearly displayed knowledge of the business of golf and the local market. Given the time contraints (NGF noted Greenwich Golf Group had 5 business days to do the study) the consultant seemingly put in a yeoman’s effort to establish reasonable parameters for potential daily fee demand, green fee levels, pool/tennis membership levels, and operating expenses. “
But notes, “…the analysis relied too heavily on the demographic variables of population, age, and income to determine potential demand. There are quantitative variables (e.g., socioeconomic, site factors, price/value proposition relative to competitors) that can affect demand and determine the type of operating model that would be most successful; NGF believes it is unlikely that these types of variables could be sufficiently addressed in the amount of time given for this study (Greenwich Golf Group’s study). This is especially salient in today’s golf market, as many uncontrollable external influences are negatively affecting the business of golf facility operations.






