Air Quality in Houses Near Gedney Dump Investigated. City Tweaks Cap Plan

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE DUMP NEWS. By John F. Bailey. Special to WPCNR From the Department of Environmental Conservation Press Office. March 18, 2011:


The Department of Environmental Conservation is having an investigation conducted into the quality of air in citizen residences near the city landfill that has been contaminated by TCEs since the mid-1970s.


The DEC reported this new phase of their investigation of city dump pollution today exclusively to WPCNR. The investigation of residential air quality adjacent to the dump has not been completed yet, and no information has been issued on how many homes are being sampled, and for how long and what seasons they will be tested further. WPCNR awaits more details from the DEC.


The information was disclosed in an update to WPCNR on where the clean-up of the dump stands after six years of the DEC negotiations with the city.


The DEC also reports a major six-month “capping” plan will begin in the White Plains Gedney Landfill under DEC supervision in July,and continue into 2012,  according to Wendy Rosenbach, spokesperson for the New York State Department of Conservation which this week was to have toured the landfill with White Plains officials.


The city closure plan though still has not met DEC expectations and further “tweaks” to the plan are required to be resubmitted to the DEC next month, according to Ms. Rosenbach’s latest update issued exclusively to WPCNR Friday afternoon.


Ms. Rosenbach said that White Plains will hold a public information meeting on the constuction to be conducted on the dump.


The Mayor’s Office has declined to confirm to WPCNR despite daily requests that a “walk-through” inspection of the dump reported by the top DEC facilities management official, scheduled this week took place and the results  of it,or whether it took place at all.


This is the first the DEC has reported inquiries into the dump’s pollution affects into the air at populated area around the city dump,though residents and users of city ball fields have smelled nauseous fumes coming from the dump for decades.


According to Ms. Rosenbach on Monday, Martin Brand of the DEC was to tour the dump with city officials this week. John Callahan, city Chief of Staff, did not know of such a meeting when contacted Monday. According to Rosenbach, the DEC update on the dump situation will see cleanup and capping beginning in July.


Previously, on a plan that was unacceptable to the DEC in the fall, Commissioner of Public Works Joseph Nicoletti estimated the cost of clean-up and cap to be between $8 Million and $10 Million. Nicoletti submitted a revised plan in February. This week’s walk-through was to discuss that plan apparently. Nicoletti was supposed to discuss his and the city consultant’s revised plan with the DEC this week. Rosenbach of the DEC estimates six months of clean-up and capping will begin in July.


Apparently, according to Ms. Rosenbach’s statement which follows, the plan still needs work. The city has already authorized over $1 Million in fees to a consultant to prepare the closure plans. H


Here is the DEC statement from Ms. Rosenbach today:


Statement of Wendy Rosenbach:

“Below is information I received from Solid Waste staff here in the regional office re: the Gedney Way Landfill (including background information):

The facility is a 52.4 acre complex located at 87 Gedney Way, in the City of White Plains. The site was used for the disposal of incinerator ash from a municipal waste incinerator from approximately 1948. The site is operated by the Department of Public Works and is currently used for the composting of yard and leaf wastes, collection of recyclables, and storage of DPW equipment and material.


Pursuant to a June 19, 2007 DEC Consent Order, White Plains was directed to investigate the environmental conditions at the site and close the landfill under Part 360 (DEC Solid Waste regulations). Two phases of investigation were conducted in 2007 and 2008, and a supplemental off-site investigation was initiated in November 2010.


These investigations have included groundwater and surface water sampling, soil gas sampling, and an indoor air investigation of several residences located near the landfill. Results on the latest investigation are pending.

Regarding closure, a preliminary (conceptual) closure plan was approved in June 2010 by DEC.


The plan includes the capping of the landfill with a synthetic cap in some areas and soil covers in others areas.


A Design Plan, including detailed plans and specifications, was submitted to DEC regional staff on February 15, 2011.


This plan is under review.


Additional submissions and revisions, leading to a final closure plan, are expected in April 2011.


 The tentative schedule is for DEC approval in May or June 2011.


DEC anticipates the project will go to construction in July or August 2011.


 White Plains plans to hold a public information meeting to announce and describe the construction activities. While DEC expects significant areas to be capped this summer, construction is likely to go until early 2012 for all aspects of the project. 

Posted in Uncategorized

Delfino Throws Support to Glen Hockley, Dollars Next?

Hits: 0

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2011. From the Hockley People Over Politics Party. March 17,2011:


Joseph Delfino, former Mayor of White Plains from 1997 through 2009, has been named in a news release from Glen Hockley as being a “supporter” of Mr. Hockley’s candidacy, signaling a possible rift between Delfino, the Republican, and the Republican Party which picked not Hockley for Mayor, but White Plains restauranteur, Bob Hyland for Mayor instead.


 


Acknowledging the uniqueness and singular charm of each neighborhood, at his second fund-raiser in a week at 42 in the Ritz-Carlton last night, Hockley said:


“I’ve been walking these neighborhoods for at least the last ten years and I know the particular concerns in every area.  As Mayor, I will take these concerns – the unavailability of parking space, overcrowded housing, traffic violations – all the issues residents have shared with me, and make them my priority,” Hockley said.   “My goal – and my promise – is to improve our quality of life while infusing our government with the efficiency we need to lower the tax burden on our citizens.”


Among supporters at Hockley’s People Over Politics fundraisers, the relase said,  “were Former Congressman Joseph DioGuardi, Former Mayors Joseph Delfino of White Plains and Ernie Davis of Mount Vernon, and Former White Plains Councilmember, Arnie Bernstein.” 


“I am grateful for the confidence and support of everyone,” Hockley said.  “I will never lower the flag of the people.  I’ve come this far because of them and I will carry their voice to City Hall.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Bradley Receives Probation on all counts

Hits: 0

WPCNR WHITE PLAINS LAW JOURNAL By John F. Bailey and Peter Katz. March 17, 2011:


Judge Susan Capeci, sentenced former White Plains Mayor Adam Bradley to probation on all counts this morning on Mr. Bradley’s December 9 convictions for attempted assault, contempt, and three charges of harassment involving his wife. Mr. Bradley will also be subject to an order of protection prohibiting him from seeing his wife, Fumiko Bradley for five years, subject to modification for custody and visitation purposes.


Mr. Bradley must also undergo any treatments deemed appropriate and follow all provisions of his probation. Mr. Bradley will not go to jail. He will be required to pay fines for each conviction.


The charges other than the contempt of court conviction were given a one-year conditional discharge, which means that if Bradley does every thing he is supposed to, those convictions will be discharged after a year.


During today’s court session, the clerk of the court outlined the appeal procedure. The attorney representing Bradley today, Fred Shapiro, told WPCNR that now that they know the sentence, they can finish drafting their appeal and plan to file it within thirty days.


When Judge Capeci asked Bradley whether he had a statement before she passed sentence, Bradley said, “No thank you, your Honor.”


The prosecutors had asked the judge to send Bradley to jail. Prosecutor Audrey Stone said Bradley has shown a lack of remorse and contempt for the criminal justice system. Prosecutor Amy Puerto read a letter from Fumiko Bradley (who was not in court) in which she said that she learned that women who are suffering in abusive relationships can receive justice throughher experience with this case..


 When asked for reaction to today’s sentencing, Bradley told WPCNR that it would be best for him not to say anything. After the sentencing Bradley was surrounded by family and well-wishers.


The prosecutors when asked by WPCNR whether they were satisfied with the outcome, even though the judge did not accept their recommendation of jail time, declined to comment.

Posted in Uncategorized

Adam Bradley to Be Sentenced Today.

Hits: 0

 


 


WPCNR, White Plains Law Journal,  News & Comment By John F. Bailey. March 17, 2011:


 


The long, sad Adam Bradley case ends today with Mr. Bradley’s scheduled sentencing in Family Court at the Westchester County Courthouse on the docket at 9:30 AM. Or, maybe it is not over. Ahe former mayor, who resigned February 25 as Mayor, may appeal his convictions for attempted assault, contempt and three. Harassment charges involving his wife last year.


 


A media posse is expected to converge on the courthouse, complete with an inside the courtroom television poll arrangement providing maximum exposure for the former mayor’s denoument, a final public exposure.


 


The big curiosity here is whether Mr. Bradley will receive an actual jail sentence, and if he does not do time, whether he will appeal his conviction as he has vowed he will.


 


The only real winner here is clearly the district attorney.  


 


The losers are the Bradleys. Mr. Bradley now no longer has the $150,000 Mayor’s job. Mrs. Bradley has amuch lower divorce settlement potential unless a very nice job opens up somewhere for Mr.Bradley from a sympathetic benefactor. The long prosecution of the case seemed from the start more of a “get Adam Bradley” movement than a “help Fumiko Bradley and their children” movement since the prosecution to conviction clearly complicates the divorce settlement.


 


It is easily the D.A.’s most spectacular prosecution since she has been in office.


 


Successful prosecution of the case preserves the public perception that the D.A.’s Office and its domestic violence unit is still concerned and competent, vigorous and expert at prosecuting  domestic violence charges, while also showing that even if you are well connected politically, you are not above the law.


 


Not bad dividends for the district attorney for a year of work on this case.

Posted in Uncategorized

Paul Feiner Challenges Andrew Cuomo’s Budget That Would Close NY School for Deaf

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE FEINER REPORT. News & Comment. By Paul Feiner, Greenburgh Town Supervisor. March 17, 2011:


Governor Andrew Cuomo proposed budget, if approved, could lead to the closure of the New York School for the Deaf–which is located on 555 Knollwood Road. I think the closing of this historic school would be a big mistake. I am very familiar with the successes the school has had and have held every one of my swearing in ceremonies at the school  since being elected Town Supervisor (and before that Westchester County Legislator).


 I  spoke at and attended a very well attended rally at the school with County Legislator Mary Jane Shimsky and encourage residents to write to Governor Andrew Cuomo at the Executive Chamber, NYS Capitol Building, Albany, 12224.  I plan to introduce a resolution before the Greenburgh Town Board urging the Governor & State Legislature to save the school.  I will also urge the school districts in Greenburgh to  urge the state to save the school.


 


The closing of this school will destroy NY State’s reputation as having the finest system of deaf education in the nation. There are serious consequences that the proposal will have on deaf children. 











The  2011 budget proposal is a radical change and shifts the costs of educating students who require complex education environments to individual school districts.  School districts do not have specialized staff and are completely unequipped to meet the educational needs of these children.  Yet, your budget will nevertheless require school districts to serve these children, but not give them the staff needed to appropriately serve them.  In fact, there are not enough specialized staff to serve the deaf children of this state unless they are served in centralized locations such as the existing state schools.  

 

 THIS PROPOSAL ELIMINATES THE ACCESS OF DEAF CHILDREN TO AN APPROPRIATE EDUCATION. Every student has a legal right to a free appropriate public education under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.  Given that schools for the deaf serve some of the most complex learners in the state, and a large percentage of the children have more than one disability, we can say with total certainty that many children will not have their educational needs met in their home school districts, thus stripping them of their right to an appropriate education.

 

WHY THE PROPOSAL HURTS THE DEAF AND MAKES NO SENSE

 

• Schools for the Deaf will be forced to close, leaving deaf children isolated in school districts, without teachers and peers who can directly communicate with them.


• Already financially devastated school districts will be unable to provide essential services required to appropriately educate deaf children.


• The proposal will result in deaf children being assessed by people who cannot communicate directly with them.  School districts do not have the specialized staff who are familiar with deaf children and do not have the appropriate tools to evaluate them.

 

• The proposal will violate the federal law mandate for a free appropriate public education.  The school serves many children who have complex learning needs that cannot be met properly by their local school districts.


• The proposal will result in special education litigation throughout the State caused by the district and state’s failure to provide a free appropriate public education.


• The proposal will cost New York State more in the long term. Experience has shown that deaf children who are deprived of an appropriate education are more likely to be functionally illiterate, unemployed, and completely dependent on government services and assistance.

Paul Feiner

Greenburgh Town Supervisor

 

HISTORY OF THE NEW YORK SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF–THE 2ND OLDEST SCHOOL IN THE UNITED STATES

 

In the early 1800s, the Rev. John Stanford gathered a small group of deaf children in downtown New York City to teach them the alphabet and basic language skills.

 

Chartered in 1817, the New York School for the Deaf is the second oldest school for the deaf in the United States and the oldest in New York State.  Originally located in New York City in the Almshouse behind City Hall, the school moved uptown in 1829 to a ten-acre parcel of land between present day Saks’ Fifth Avenue and St. Patrick’s Cathedral.

 

The school moved again in 1856, after purchasing a 37.5-acre wooded estate on the bank of the Hudson River, near the current location of Columbia Presbyterian Hospital. The school adopted the name of this estate, Fanwood, as its nickname, one that has followed the school to its current location.     

 

In the late 1890s, Fanwood adopted a military curriculum to instill discipline and provide a more structured learning environment for students. The school was the first in the nation to do so and was also the first school for the deaf to form a military band. For the next 50 years, precise military drills in tight formations were a daily occurrence on the Fanwood parade grounds.








 



After spending 80 years in Upper Manhattan, the school purchased a 77-acre apple farm on Knollwood Road near White Plains in 1934. Embarking on a major expansion program, the school constructed Ford, Peet and Currier Halls, the current centerpieces of its campus, as well its athletic field and several residential dormitories. In 1952, the school dropped its military program and become a coeducational institution again. Since then, Fanwood has continued to expand its mission of providing a wide range of educational services to help deaf and hard-of-hearing children in school and become successful adults.

 

In 1964, the school built Johnson Pavilion to accommodate the growing numbers of elementary school children who became deaf as a result of the rubella epidemic. Today, the pre-school classes represent the fastest-growing segment of the school’s enrollment.

 

Since 1977, Fanwood has practiced a total communication approach to learning – which challenges students to develop their linguistic ability in a number of areas, oral and written English in addition to American Sign Language.

 

Fanwood has also fully recognized the benefits of using technology to help deaf children function in the world of the hearing. The TTY phones and closed caption TVs of the 1970s have given way to video phones, smart boards and computer learning aids. 
 

In addition, all students are now assigned MacBooks as part of the Apple 1:1 program for use in the classroom and, for high school students, to use at home as well.

 

As the New York School for the Deaf approaches its 200th anniversary, Fanwood will continue to build upon its heritage of combining individualized instruction for students with the latest innovations in education for deaf students.  


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Feiner: Reasons Why Indian Point Should Be Closed

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE FEINER REPORT. News & Comment  Special to WPCNR By Paul Feiner, Town of Greenburgh Supervisor, March 16, 2011:









  Many of my constituents are concerned about Indian Point. The recent Japan earthquake and nuclear power plant radiation leaks (meltdowns) have caused many people to question what would happen if our area experiences an earthquake.


Indian Point, like the nuclear power plants in Japan, are located on earthquake faults. Although it is unlikely that we will experience as strong an earthquake as the earthquake in Japan – Indian Point is located very close to NYC. I do not believe that nuclear power plants should be located near heavily populated areas.



  An earthquake is only one risk. The other: a terrorist attack. Indian Point is a possible terrorist target.


Are we at greater risk because Indian Point is so old (built almost 40 years ago)? Has age caused corrosion and rusting? We all know of the pipe leaks. Is there corrosion or cracking on the inside of these pipes?


A report from Lamont Doherty (Columbia University’s earth observatory) indicates that our region is due for a big earthquake—a 6 or 7 magnitude. Are we prepared?


  If an evacuation would be required most of my constituents (myself included) are not prepared. There have been no evacuation exercises involving the general public. Elected officials in Greenburgh and in a good portion of Westchester have not been briefed as to what we should do. Our roads can’t handle an evacuation and traffic will not keep moving. There are inadequate shelters.


  Unlike Japan, we have not planned to provide our residents with KI pills and protection. Radiation suits are not available.  And, our cell phone system in Westchester is not very reliable –there are many sections that have no cell service, making it difficult to communicate.


  Do we have a contingency plan for food and water contamination? If winds carry fallout toward the New Croton, Kensico and Hillview reservoirs contingency plans for food and water supply are necessary.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Castelli Unhappy with Assembly Budget

Hits: 0

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. Special to WPCNR from the Office of Assemblyman Robert Castelli, 89th District. March 15, 2011:


Assemblyman Robert J. Castelli (R,C-Goldens Bridge) today announced he would be voting against the Assembly Majority’s one-house budget resolution, calling it a letdown for New York taxpayers and attacking the resolution for containing onerous tax hikes, including a tax on infants and cancer treatments, while lacking needed mandate relief. 


 “The Assembly Majority’s one-house budget resolution does not contain the necessary reforms needed to address the state’s current and long-term fiscal needs,” Castelli said. “Instead of offering a resolution that seeks to improve the state’s finances, the Assembly Majority is giving New York taxpayers more of the same in higher taxes and increased spending and no relief from unfunded state mandates.  Westchester families and businesses deserve better.” 


 


Assemblyman Castelli noted that the Assembly Majority’s budget resolution adds half a billion dollars to the Governor’s proposed $133 billion spending plan and calls for $700 million in new taxes this year.  


 “Lawmakers need to do better,” Castelli said.  “The resolution hardly addresses any of the tough decisions that lawmakers were expected to make this year, no unfunded mandate relief, no Medicaid reform and no spending restraint.  If the Majority continues down this path, they will push us into bankruptcy and possibly a government shutdown.”


 However, Assemblyman Castelli cautioned that this is not the last step in the budget process.


 “We currently have the chance to right the ship of state; but the longer the Majority avoids making tough choices and holds onto the belief that they can tax their way out of any problem, the longer it will be until New York can move out of the current economic crisis and move to a more vibrant economy,” Castelli said.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Hockley Files. Will Cut Taxes, Trim Budget. Oppose FASNY at Ridgeway.

Hits: 0

WPCNR Campaign 2011 by John F Bailey March 14, 2011:


 


Glen Hockley, People Over Politics candidate for Mayor of White Plains submitted petitions containing over 1,100 signatures to the County Board of Elections this morning in order to place his name on the ballot for the March 31 Special Election for mayor of White Plains(pending Board of Election approval of his petition).


 



 


Hockley said he was going to bring taxes down. Asked if elected mayor if he would keep the city budget where it is at this year’s $155.5 million, Mr. Hockley said “we need to do a major efficiency program at City Hall,” and that he would “look at every area of the budget and department for more cost savings and strip away what is not working.”


 


Hockley came out strongly for preserving the integrity of White Plains neighborhoods, such as, he said “by not putting a school in the middle of a residential neighborhood. Are you listening, Ridgeway?  Are you listening, Gedney Farms? Are you listening Haviland Manor?”  This apparently is a reference to the plan hotly opposed by the Gedney Association where the French American School  would  build three schools and an auditiorium  on the former Ridgway Country Club property. The plan is about to be submitted to the city.


 


 


Hockley in a prepared statement, said he was running for the people of this city, that then he is running as and it truly independent quote not beholden to any political party.


 


On Ridgeway he was asked how he would stop FASNY building there.  Hockley said he had a few alternatives to offer which he would reveal when he became mayor.


 


Asked to evaluate his two adversaries for mayor: Tom Roach, the Democrat and Common Council President, now Acting Mayor,  and Bob Hyland, the Republican nominee,. Hockley, analyzed them this way. “One (Hyland) has business experience; the other (Roach) has administrative experience and I have both,” Hockley said.


 


Dan Pagano, Mr. Hockley’s attorney told WPCNR that the Board of Elections has three days to raise any objections to Mr. Hockley’s petitions. Mr. Hockley has three days after objections are filed by the Board  to counter the objections, if any, are made.


 


Pagano said that if Mr. Hockley was taken off  the ballot by the Board of Elections. Hockley, could file a temporary restraining order, which Pagano said, could delay the election scheduled for March 31, 2011.


 


Hockley said petitions were mandatory for him to be placed on the ballot because he was not endorsed by an officially recognized political party.


 



 


With News 12 camera rolling, Hockley submitted his signatures to Board of Elections, cochairman, Reginald LaFayette (above). LaFayette said to the television cameras and this reporter Hockley had all the documents he needed, including a certificate of acceptance, which Hockley’s failure to turn in, in August of 2009 resulted in his being forced off the 2009 Mayoral ballot and into a 8-month federal court case which Hockley lost. Hockley was forced to mount a write-in campaign for Mayor in 2009, in which he received 1,791 votes as opposed to former Mayor Adam Bradley’s over 6,000 votes.


 


Upon successfully delivering his petitions, Hockley thanked supporters outside the Board of Elections.  Stating that “nothing has taken or will ever take” his focus off the “well-being of our citizens,” Hockley stressed the importance of reducing taxes without sacrificing public safety or city services.


Capitalizing on his reputation for standing “for and with the people, unencumbered by political harnesses,” Hockley proposed, “This is our chance to define ourselves as independent, forward-thinking people sculpting a new city of fulfilled promise and achieved potential,” adding, “This is our chance to get it right!”



 


Conservative Flip Flop


 


Hockley had thought he had the Conservative Party endorsement for this Special Election last Friday. He was informed by the CitizeNetReporter that Hugh Fox, Conservative Party head had called this reporter to say the Conservatives had thrown their support to Hyland instead.Hugh Fox, the chairman of the Conservative Party, and county employee, had apparently reneged on his original written promise to endorse Hockley, and switched his endorsement to Mr. Hyland, the Republican, instead against the wishes of the White Plains Conservative Party.


 


Asked in a news conference if he had any idea of what happened between his (Hockley’s) being told he had the conservative endorsement and him losing the conservative endorsement Hockley said it was in the past and he was moving forward. He said he had no idea why that happened.


 


Posted in Uncategorized

COUNTY CONSERVATIVE LEADERS REJECT HOCKLEY NOD. GIVES LINE TO HYLAND

Hits: 0

WPCNR Campaign 2011 Backroom Bulletin by John F Bailey. March 11, 2011:

Hugh Fox, the Chairman of the Westchester County Conservative party personally contacted WPCNR at 5:15 this afternoon to report that the County Conservative Party leadership has rejected the local White Plains Conservative Party endorsement of Glen Hockley and has endorsed Republican Bob Hyland for mayor instead.


This means that Mr. Hockley will not appear on two lines in the Thursday, March 31 election for Mayor as Mr. Hockley had informed WPCNR at 9:15 Friday morning.


Mr. Fox said that the County conservative committee is within its right in going against the local party chapter recommendation. Fox said the County Committee  will consider recommendations from the local conservative parties for candidates, but they always reserve the right to endorse their own candidate.


 Mr. Fox said that the decision to spurn Hockley was made this morning. This was apparently after Mr. Hockley had confirmed that he was going to be on the Conservative line to this reporter this morning. Ar. Hockley also sent out a press release reporting he was endorsed by the Conservative Party.


Fox did not say why the County committee decided to endorse Mr. Hyland, instead. Before WPCNR  could  ask the question as to why Hyland got the nomination, Mr. Fox had ended the call, and could not be reached for further comment as to why the switch.

The sudden switch on the County conservative party leadership level means Mr. Hockley now must rely on his petitions to appear on the ballot for the March 31 election on his People Over Politics party line.


Fox said that Mike Chillemi, Hockley’s campaign manager was well aware that the county committee could reverse the local endorsement.

Posted in Uncategorized

Hockley Confirms he Has Received the Endorsement of the Conservative Party for M

Hits: 0

WPCNR Campaign 2011. By John F Bailey. March 11, 2011:


Former Councilman Glen Hockley confirmed to WPCNR he has received the endorsement of the Conservative Party of White Plains for mayor. Hockley said this would give him two lines on the Thursday, March 31 election ballot: the Conservative line and his own People over Politics, wine. Hockley said his next step was to file his petitions on Monday at the board of elections.


In a news release this morning, Hockley announced he would kick off his campaign for Mayor with a news conference at 11 A.M. Monday at the Westchester County Board of Elections.


Mr. Hockley said he would be kicking off this campaign on Monday morning for mayor. The election will be held Thursday, March 31 in each of the 43 districts across the city of White Plains.

Asked what he brought to the campaign and felt White Plains needed. Hockley told WPCNR, he would concentrate on tax relief. He said he had a plan to do something about parking in White Plains to make parking more consumer friendly. He also said he wanted to make the city business climate, more friendly to business. Hockley said his campaign owed nothing to no one, and that he was only accountable to the people.


 In an official news release from the Campaign, Hockley called for “renewed focus on the future of White Plains,  it’s time to put the people first — not politics,” he said.  “It’s time for reasonable and rational action today that leads to a more prosperous and successful tomorrow.”


Hockley recently accepted the endorsement of the Conservative Party, while continuing his independent bid on the People Over Politics ticket.  “I’m grateful to the Conservative Party for its appreciation of my contributions to this City, and for its confidence in my leadership,” he said.  “Today, as always, my focus is on the burden of our taxpayers and their concerns,” Hockley said.


In October 2009, Hockley’s People Over Politics launched a write-in campaign only two weeks before Election Day and won close to 2,000 votes,(1,791) surprising many pundits in a city unaccustomed to the write-in ballot. 


Since then, the release said, the independent party has retained its volunteers, stayed organized and focused on the City’s economic recovery.  “We were heartened by the strong support we received in the last election and our numbers have been steadily growing this past year,” Hockley stated.   “I think people are sick of political posturing and are starving for some basic common sense and efficiency in city government,” he added.


Campaign volunteer Jamie Baker-Price quoted by the release, recalled what she says is key to her dedication to Hockley’s campaign.  “Last week during an organizational meeting, Glen summed up what, to me, it’s all about.  He said, ‘If we strip away the politics, we are left with each other standing eye to eye and discovering what connects us as humans and neighbors.’  He said, ‘It’s time for politicians to become people again.’  I think the whole world would benefit from that thinking,” she added.


On Monday March 14 at 11am, Hockley will kick off his campaign with a speech in front of the Westchester County Board of Elections, “to share my hopes for White Plains and outline objectives and goals for our future,” he said.  “For at least a decade, I’ve engaged in my “walk-abouts” — meeting and talking to citizens and merchants on every single street in White Plains.  I know the concerns of residents and businesspeople in every neighborhood and the success they deserve.  My candidacy for Mayor is all about them.”


 

Posted in Uncategorized