St. Patrick’s Day ONE : Photos of the Day

Hits: 0

WPCNR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE DAY. By WPCNR ROVING PHOTOGRAPHERS STEVE SISLER and PAULA PIEKOS. MARCH 12, 2012:


White Plains staged its annual St. Patrick’s Day Parade Saturday under crisp, brisk sunny skies kicking off a long day of celebration, “pre-gaming” St. Patricks’ Day next Saturday. The Department of Public Safety was faced with a fire in the loft of  Nicky’s Pizza, and the Fire Bureau  knocked it down very quickly  despite the crowds. The restaurant was closed Sunday.


Here are some photographs of the day courtesy of White Plains’ Steve Sisler and Paula Piekos.


 



The White Plains Department of Public Safety Color Guard


(Photo by Stephen Sisler)



Mayor of White Plains Thomas Roach, (left) and Westchester County Executive Robert Astorino


(Stephen Sisler)



Left to Right, Assemblyman Robert Castelli (93rd A.D.), ,Councilman Dennis Krolian, Councilwoman Milagros Lecuona and Councilman David Buchwald (Stephen Sissler)



Westchester County Clerk Timothy Idoni, left, and White Plains Bill Ryan, Westchester County Legislator District 5.


(Paula Piekos)



Ana Leon, Ms. Westchester


(This Photo and photos following by Stephen Sisler)


and







 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

White Plains Goldberger Appointed Village Attorney of Mamaroneck.

Hits: 0


WPCNR WHITE PLAINS LAW JOURNAL. Special to WPCNR from McCullough, Goldberger & Staudt. March 9, 2012:


Charles Goldberger, pictured above, a partner in the White Plains-based law firm McCullough Goldberger & Staudt, LLP, has been appointed Village Attorney for the Village of Mamaroneck, NY. The Village Board of Trustees unanimously approved the nomination that was effective immediately.  Mayor Norman Rosenblum selected Goldberger for nomination after reviewing the credentials of four other law firms that had expressed interest in the position.


“Key to making this selection was not only the expertise of Charlie Goldberger but that of the entire firm,” Mayor Ronsenblum said.He added that Goldberger had successfully represented the Village in several court matters, including an ongoing case involving a failed development project that is near resolution.  The Mayor also recalled that when he served as a Trustee for the Village of Larchmont about three decades ago, he had been impressed with Staudt’s work as Village Attorney of Larchmont.

“McCullough Goldberger & Staudt gives us the background and advantage of their research in specific areas, such as drafting local laws, court time and trials and so on,” the Mayor said. “The bottom line is I am confident that Charlie Goldberger and the firm itself will be the best lawyer the Village can have.”



Goldberger said that his representation of the Village in two court cases, including the ongoing Sheldrake Estates Condominiums LLC and Sheldrake Lofts, LLC vs. the Village of Mamaroneck, offered the Village an introduction to the municipal and litigation work the law firm provides.

“This municipality expands the scope of our municipal work and that is one of the main reasons why we sought the appointment,” Goldberger said. “It adds one more large Village to our municipal practice. On a personal note, I am really looking forward to the challenge.”

The Village Attorney’s responsibilities include: attending and providing counsel to the Board of Trustees at its twice-monthly sessions, dealing with contractual claims, as well as representing the Village in court cases.

McCullough, Goldberger & Staudt, LLP was established in 1984 by the merger of Taylor, McCullough & Geoghegan with Fredericks, Goldberger & Liberman, two firms with long, successful histories in Westchester County. The firm’s strong municipal, zoning, real estate and banking background combined with its litigation experience have resulted in a diversified firm with the depth and range to fully service client matters—from inception, through negotiations and to conclusion, including litigation when necessary.

The appointment enhances the already impressive municipal practice of McCullough Goldberger & Staudt. James Staudt, a partner, is currently the Village Attorney for the Village of Larchmont. The firm also serves as Village Attorney to the Villages of Croton-on-Hudson and Bronxville.  Additionally the firm has been Special Counsel to the City of Yonkers in connection with its complete Zoning Code revision, the Village of Ossining in connection with its Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code, and the Village of Scarsdale regarding its downtown mixed-use zoning.



 

Posted in Uncategorized

County Association Announces $150 Million in Debt Financing to Lure Growing Comp

Hits: 0

WPCNR ECONOMY ENGINE. From the Westchester County Associaiton. (Edited) March 9, 2012:


Thursday, the Westchester County Association announced that the Blueprint Accelerator Network, L.L.C., has taken root in Westchester, paving the way to attract innovative businesses with the potential to create new jobs in the county.


The Blueprint for Westchester is organizing a revolutionary Blueprint Accelerator Network to spur entrepreneurial growth and create the business giants of tomorrow. “We are combining Westchester’s prime business resources — seed financing, top professional services, office space, and mentors – into one package to pave a pathway to success for early-stage companies with great potential to grow,” notes William V. Cuddy, Jr., Chairman of The Blueprint for Westchester initiative. “We’re putting into practice a cutting edge economic development strategy.”  

The Westchester County Association said it has made impressive progress in its The Blueprint for Westchester initiative, launched just 10 months ago. “We are happy to report that one million square feet of vacant commercial space has come off the market, due in large part to companies purchasing buildings to repurpose, which is a cornerstone of The Blueprint for Westchester,” noted Marissa Brett, Executive Director, Economic Development at the Westchester County Association. “Space also has been filled as new companies move in and current companies expand. It is clear that the compelling message of The Blueprint has helped create a more optimistic business environment in the county.”


One of the Blueprint’s goals is to create quality jobs and generate tax revenue for the residents of Westchester County by reducing the inventory of unoccupied commercial space by fifty percent — or three million square feet. Based on real estate industry calculations, attracting businesses to occupy that space would create 9,000-15,000 jobs, or three to five new jobs for every one thousand square feet absorbed…   



Now, The Blueprint for Westchester is organizing a revolutionary Blueprint Accelerator Network to spur entrepreneurial growth and create the business giants of tomorrow. “We are combining Westchester’s prime business resources — seed financing, top professional services, office space, and mentors – into one package to pave a pathway to success for early-stage companies with great potential to grow,” notes William V. Cuddy, Jr., Chairman of The Blueprint for Westchester initiative. “We’re putting into practice a cutting edge economic development strategy.”
 

 


Nicholas Puro, Co-Chair of The Blueprint for Westchester’s Entrepreneurial Work Group which is spearheading the launch of the Blueprint Accelerator Network, emphasizes that “This is a defining moment in the future of Westchester County. Westchester now can compete with entrepreneurial epicenters such as Silicon Valley, the Research Triangle, and Boston. We will be able to attract, grow, and retain innovative businesses that will create jobs, jobs, and more jobs.” Accepted companies will commit to remain in Westchester following their graduation from the Accelerator.  

 


The Blueprint Accelerator Network already has attracted $150 million in investment. Provident Bank, The Westchester Bank, Mahopac National Bank, M&T Bank and Community Mutual Savings Bank have committed a total of $100 million in debt financing. An additional $50 million will come from in-kind contributions and private sector investors who have expressed interest in the initiative…   


The Blueprint Accelerator Network will provide early-stage companies access the rich intellectual capital of Westchester’s colleges and universities. “Westchester’s higher education institutions have a trove of resources to fast track the growth of promising businesses,” explains Dr. Kimberly Cline, President of Mercy College and Chair of the WCA Higher Education Committee. “Our pipeline of talented interns and potential employees, as well research and technology transfer opportunities, are valuable assets for business.”  

 


Private sector power 

The Blueprint Accelerator Network is funded by the private sector, and capital will be raised by the Westchester County Association, a not-for-profit organization. The Accelerator has been organized as a limited liability company that will be governed by a governance committee of business leaders. A selection committee will establish criteria for qualification and will include members with knowledge and experience in venture capital, business acceleration and innovative industries…   

 


 


“We will focus on attracting companies that are enjoying some success and have more than an idea” explains Mr. Puro. He notes that the Blueprint Accelerator Network is unique. “Unlike traditional ‘brick and mortar’ incubators, we’re not limited to one building. Instead we will pair with early-stage companies with the best space and services for their needs.”  


 


Partners of the Business Accelerator Network will offer accepted companies a variety of services. To date, they include legal services provided by Bleakley Platt & Schmidt, L.L.P., and Cuddy & Feder, L.L.P. Accounting services will be supplied by O’Connor Davies L.L.P., marketing and public relations services will come from Harrison Edwards, Inc., and technology services will be provided by Compufit. Normandy Real Estate Partners, Reckson, a division of SL Green Realty Corp., and RPW Group, are among several real estate companies that will offer commercial space. Many more to come.  

 


Accelerators vs. incubators 

Unlike small business incubators, which offer centralized office space and shared services to startup companies, business accelerators operate as “boot camps” for early-stage companies to prepare them to seek venture capital financing. The hope is that they will become the next Apple Computer, Facebook, or Google. Only a few companies are accepted into an accelerator through a highly selective process. Accelerators provide seed capital, access to legal, accounting, and marketing services, and partnerships with universities, and opportunities to work with established businesses in the early-stage company’s field. Once a company reaches the next stage of growth, it “graduates” and a new early-stage startup takes its place…   

 


Timeline 

Implementation of the Blueprint Accelerator Network is on a fast track itself. The legal entity will be formed and finalized by the end of Q1 2012. Candidate and selection criteria, as well as selecting members for the candidate selection committee, will be completed by the end of Q2 2012. The first call for business plans will occur in Q3 2012, when finalists will be identified and invited into the program. A second round of selections is scheduled to occur in Q4 2012.  

 


At a press conference Thursday morning, William M. Mooney, Jr., President of the Westchester County Association called the program “a game changer” and adds that the Blueprint Accelerator Network will not only be a place in which home-grown Westchester entrepreneurs can take root, but it also will attract the best and the brightest entrepreneurial ideas from other regions. “Entrepreneurs don’t hesitate to move to communities prepared to offer them the right support, and that’s exactly what we intend to offer them right here in Westchester,” Mr. Mooney concludes…

Posted in Uncategorized

Who Could Ask for Anything More? ‘S WONDERFUL Fab Five Kicks Up Their Heels!

Hits: 0

 


 


WPCNR STAGE DOOR. Theatrical Review by John F. Bailey March 6, 2012:


 


Come on Cutes, get on your dancing boots and come dance with the “Fab Five”:


 


 



 


The delightful “Sutton Fosteresque” Dierdre Haren, ( far left)  the comedic gamin-belter  Stacey Harris (being held aloft),  the sultry Mary Millben, (front right), the debonair manic Harold Lloyd look-alike,  Blake Slaybaugh (back right) and the  high flying leading man, Sean Watkins (second from left.


 


The effervescent stars of  ‘S Wonderful give us a graduate course in Gershwin that romances, enhances,whisks us  magically through the greatest love songs of all time.  Here they are performing the intoxicating Just Another Rumba!


 


‘S Wonderful, opened at the Westchester Broadway Theatre  Friday night, resuming for just the next three weeks Wednesday  is more than a review, but five shows-in-a-show stringing out a Gershwin Galaxy of Hits in a Rhapsody in Blue from  the songwriting team that captured love in song for decades.  ‘S Wonderful, put together by  Ray Roderick at the request of the Gershwin estate  will make you feel like dancing again.


 



It  weaves 50 George and Ira Gershwin classic songs into a non-stop extravaganza of electrifying dance routines (each completely different and attention-getting), clean comedy and lovingly rendered songs drawing bravos from theatre aficionados on their feet wanting more Friday night. From Rhapsody in Blue to  Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off  to Embraceable You  all the Gershwin “Oldies But Forevers” are back to show the youngsters what love feels like, and the oldsters those wonderful feelings again.


 


The moment the man in white tail and black tie, Ken Lundie seats himself elegantly at the Yamaha the unforgettable all-time  signature clarinet riff  of Rhapsody in Blue  followed with ‘S Wonderful sung by the five actors who carry this show  takes flight! The committed high energy cast never comes down. They are in the stars!


 



Blake Slaybaugh left, hooked up with “The Chic Thief,” Dierdre Haren, singing I’ve Got a Crush on You.


 


The hour and a quarter first Act delivers The Gershwin songs in time capsules. The first episode sets us in the 1920s in a where-else – a newspaper copy room where Mr. Slaybaugh, a ringer for the mannerisms of the silent star of the twenties, Harold Lloyd,  dreams of life as a glamorous investigative reporter. His Nice Work if You Can Get It,  (dreaming of love) followed by  I’ve Got Rhythm arranged and coreographed in a clever typewriting sequence sets the the news room scene.


 


Enter “The Chic Thief,” the ultra 1920s, “it” girl in Diedre Haren  as Leslie who places an ad for Boy Wanted. Harold realizes that Leslie’s description matches a jewelry thief called “The Chic Thief.” He follows her  on a trolley, clever created on stage) to where she works selling wedding dresses, in a very clever surveillance sequence. Eventually Leslie and Harold are apprehended but not before she sings I’ve Got a Crush on You just before she and Harold are hauled off to jail, but they will be together after 10 years.


 


Mr. Slaybaugh’s comic timing, high kicks and dead-on sight gags make the number work, as he sings Kickin the Clouds Away.  Ms. Haren’s Leslie is a lovely energetic comic foil with a sweet crystal voice of a star to be. Her energy and presence on stage deliver the same j’n c’est quoi as Sutton Forster. She alone is a reason you should see this show, in addition to the other 4 stars.


 



 


Mary Millben as Nina takes center stage in vignette two as the scene shifts to New Orleans where she tells the story of her and her friend Jane (Stacy Harris) in  a series of musical postcards Jane sends Nina from around the world  Ms. Millben’s comfortable contralto (between Della Reese and Ella Fitzgerald) captures your attention with The Man I Love (whom we learn Jane has run away with). 


 


Ms. Millben, making her New York debut in this show, (after appearing in the Super Bowl with Bruce Springsteen and at Arena Stage in Washington with Maurice Hines,  delivers another Gershwin classic, Summertime, trioettes with Ms. Harris and Mr. Slaybaugh on There’s a Boat Dat’s Leavin’ Soon; duets with Ms. Harris on A Foggy Day. The glamour of travel is captured by the seamless change of scene by the master of the footlights, Andrew Gmoser.  Miss Harris and Ms. Millben finish off this set of whirlwind travel with a standing ovation version of It Ain’t Necessarily So and Of Thee I Sing.


 



 


Act One’s most charming skit depicts the heartbreak and longing songs of the war years, featuring Ms. Haren (left) and Mr. Watkins as a romantic couple. Here Set Designer John Farrell creates Paris very cleverly and of course Ms. Haren fits right in this milieu. She and Mr. Watkins  as Gene, her sailor romantic lead, whom she meets in a café where she is working naturally deliver a very believable romance in 25 minutes. As Mr. Watkins says to Ms. Haren, “if only the Mona Lisa had a smile like that!” And he’s right! She was born to be a leading lady!


 


 


Ms. Haren and Mr. Watkins executive a marvelous dance set to Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off (one of my favorite Gershwins) and a very fulfilling, touching Love is Here to Stay.   When the war is over, and the two are reunited we are treated to Strike Up the Band.


 


 



 


 


 


Act Two gives the comic and songsmithette talents of Stacy Harris (on Sean Watkins’ houlders) as Jane has her moments—in Hollywood. She’s a makeup artist making up Mr.Watkins who plays a star actor very in love with himself.


 


Ms. Harris demonstrates spot-on comic timing and the audience gets every line. Ms. Harris is given a chance to screen test in a love scene  with Mr. Watkins, and when she is kissed by him, she sings Do It Again that scorches the lyrics.  Her “Do it Again” silences the audience it is so sexy. This woman deserves a sit-com.  Ms. Harris and Mr. Watkins  maintain a great comic joy in this sequence. She also does a terrific pratfall through a mirror to set up the sequence!


 


 


Fastforward to the finale which is a tour de force of Gershwin songs in short snips, cleverly conceived using the I-Pod player as a device to switch from Gershwin Era to Gershwin Era.  Here in another exhausting high energy sequence the Fab Five do Swanee, Someone to Watch Over Me (Ms. Haren), They Can’t Take That Away From Me, Embraceable You.


 


When the houselights  finally dim, the audience applauds and they do not stop. The Fab Five and the Magnificent 7  (the orchestra) perform some more with a boffo finale.


 



 


If you want hear  one of the great orchestras rounded up  to Gershwin Gershwin, these are the players: Ken Lundie on piano, Kathy Braver, violin, Ron Kozak, Reeds, Jason Colby, Trumpet; Jason Ingram,Trombone;Ron Raffio, Bass/Tuba; Ron Ross, Percussion. This group is seamless, leaves you starry-eyed, teary-eyed and sensitive with there dead solid perfect musical phrasings.


 


What a show! You can only see it for the next three weeks. If you want to brush up on your Gershwin, this is the show. If you want to get your squeeze in the mood, this is the show, if want be be wrapped stars, romance, and good feelings  this is the show. And you get dinner with the price of your ticket. All That and Gershwin too! Who Could Ask for Anything More!


 


For ticket information contact (914) 592-2222, or go to the theatre website at  www.broadwaytheatre.com


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Thruway Authority Commits to a Express Rapid Transit Lane on New Tappan Zee Brid

Hits: 0

 


 


WPCNR TAPPAN ZEE NEWS. March 1,1012:


 


New York State Thruway representatives and the Department of Transportation made it official last week: there will be a dedicated Bus Express Lane on the new Tappan Zee Bridge East and Westbound when the bridge opens.


 


The confirmation was made directly to WPCNR by New York State Thruway press spokesperson and later through a press release, confirming the direct statement released last week to WPCNR,in the Thruway Authority MYTH-FACT presentation reported by WPCNR.


 


The Thursday evening  firm promise of Express Bus Lanes is the first concrete acknowledgement that Mass Transit will have a place on the bridge from when it is opened (projected for 2017)


 

Posted in Uncategorized

White Plains Guidance Counselor Named Counselor of the Year by University of Mia

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. From Michele Schoenfeld. March 5,2012:


 


            White Plains High School Guidance Counselor Alvera Pollard received the University of  Miami School Counselor of the Year Award for Excellence in Counseling.  A plaque was presented to Ms. Pollard at the School Counselor College Conference at the University, in Coral Gables, Florida, in February. 


 


            Ms. Pollard was nominated for the award by a University of Miami student, Michael Valentino, who graduated from White Plains High School in 2010.  Criteria for the honor specified a guidance counselor who was “motivating, inspiring and encouraging throughout the student’s high school career.” 


 


The essay written by Valentino was selected to be read at the opening ceremony of the conference, and related the difficulties he faced in an effort to pursue his education.  Both he and his sister, whom Ms. Pollard also counseled at the High School, overcame underprivileged backgrounds and benefited greatly from her faith and support.  Valentino said, “Ms. Pollard inspired him to be the best than I can be and I will carry that inspiration with me throughout life.”


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Houlihan-Lawrence: Contracts Not Closed Indicate Strong Housing Upturn in Westch

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE HOUSING NEWS. March 1, 2012:


The Houlihan Lawrence 4th Quarter Market Report issued today reports the highest single family home activity in ten years is taking place in below-$500,000 homes in Westchester County.


The realtor reports 336 homes  in Westchester, priced under $500,000 are in contract as of December 31, 2011, a 39% increase  from the fourth quarter of 2010. The company reports this gain as the highest year-end total for signed contracts in that price range since 2002. In Putnam and Dutchess Counties homes priced under $300,000 in contract as of the end of the year were up 25% in Putnam and 10% in Dutchess. H-L  evaluates this trend in movement of lower-market homes as “a base upon which a long-term recovery (in local housing) can begin to build.”


In White Plains the median sales price of homes sold in the 4th quarter was $575,000, the average price of homes sold in White Plains is “in the low 6’s” according to Glen Hockley, White Plainsian of  Houlihan-Lawrence. He describes the White Plains market as very attractive. He says he is doing a lot of  relocations, and that rentals in White Plains are going as fast as they come on the market.


The median price of single family homes  in White Plains declined over the twelve months of 2011 $32,000 from $583,000 to $550,000. In the final quarter of 2011, White Plains saw 32 single family home sales, the same as the fourth quarter of 2010. In Westchester County, the number of homes sold in the fourth quarter were down 20%, which H-L says was due to the low number of homes going to contract in the August-October period. The median price of single family homes in Westchester County is $600,000 as of December 31, down  4.7% from 2010.


H-L predicts: “prices are likely to remain at or near current levels for 2012. We also expect the emerging trend of higher transaction volume to begin working its way up from the lower price ranges, setting the stage for a more robust housing recovery in 2013 and beyond.”


 

Posted in Uncategorized

FBI ROUNDS UP 36 IN NO FAULT INSURANCE FRAUD.

Hits: 0

WPCNR FBI WIRE. From the Federal Bureau of Investigation. March 1, 2012:


Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York; Janice K. Fedarcyk, the Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”); and Raymond W. Kelly, the Police Commissioner of the City of New York (“NYPD”), announced today the unsealing of charges against 36 defendants involved in a systematic scheme to defraud private insurance companies of more than $279 million under New York’s no-fault automobile insurance law.


The indictment includes racketeering charges against eight members and associates of a criminal organization consisting primarily of individuals of Russian descent who were the owners and controllers of fraudulent medical clinics (the “No Fault Organization”), as well as 10 licensed doctors and three attorneys. The alleged scheme identified today is the largest single no-fault automobile insurance fraud ever charged, and the first case of its kind to allege violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) Act.


All of the defendants were arrested this morning in connection with today’s charges. Thirty-five were taken into custody in New York and New Jersey and will be presented and arraigned in Manhattan federal court before U.S. Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz later this afternoon. One defendant was arrested in Duluth, Minnesota and will be presented tomorrow in federal court in the District of Minnesota.


 


Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said: “Today’s charges expose a colossal criminal trifecta, as the fraud’s tentacles simultaneously reached into the medical system, the legal system, and the insurance system, pulling out cash to fund the defendants’ lavish lifestyles. As alleged, the scheme relied on a cadre of corrupt doctors who essentially peddled their medical licenses like a corner fraudster might sell fake IDs, except those medical licenses allowed unlawful entry, not to a club or a bar, but to a multi-billion-dollar pool of insurance proceeds.”


FBI Assistant Director in Charge Janice K. Fedarcyk said: “Our investigation uncovered a pattern of lucrative fraud exploiting New York’s no-fault auto insurance system to the tune of more than a quarter-of-a-billion dollars. The criminal enterprise, while it lasted, was obscenely profitable. The scheme not only unjustly enriched the defendants and defrauded insurance companies. Auto insurance fraud is also a crime that indirectly victimizes every driver in New York.”


NYPD Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said: “Our undercover officers were treated like thousands of other ‘patients’ receiving therapy, tests, and medical equipment they didn’t need. I want to congratulate the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the agents and detectives assigned to the joint FBI-NYPD Organized Crime Task Force for bringing this investigation to a successful conclusion.”


The following allegations are based on the unsealed indictment and other documents filed today in Manhattan federal court:


Under New York state law, every vehicle registered in the state is required to have no-fault automobile insurance, which enables the driver and passengers of a registered and insured vehicle to obtain benefits of up to $50,000 per person for injuries sustained in an automobile accident, regardless of fault (the “No-Fault Law”). The No-Fault Law requires prompt payment for medical treatment, thereby obviating the need for claimants to file personal injury lawsuits in order to be reimbursed. Under the No-Fault Law, patients can assign their right to reimbursement from an insurance company to others, including medical clinics that provide treatment for their injuries. New York state law also requires that all medical clinics in the state be incorporated, owned, operated, and/or controlled by a licensed medical practitioner in order to be eligible for reimbursement under the No-Fault Law. Insurance companies will not honor claims for medical treatments from a medical clinic that is not actually owned, operated, and/or controlled by a licensed medical practitioner.


From at least 2007 through 2012, the No-Fault Organization has engaged in a massive and sophisticated scheme to defraud automobile insurance companies of hundreds of millions of dollars by, among other things, creating and operating medical clinics that provided unnecessary and excessive medical treatments in order to take advantage of the No-Fault Law. In order to mislead New York authorities and private insurers, the true owners of these medical clinics (“Clinic Controllers”), almost all of whom were also members and associates of a criminal organization consisting primarily of individuals of Russian descent, paid licensed medical practitioners, including doctors, to use their licenses to incorporate the professional corporations, through which the medical clinics billed the private insurers for the bogus medical treatments. These doctors effectively operated as “straw owners” of the clinics.


The Clinic Controllers paid thousands of dollars in kickbacks to runners who recruited automobile accident passengers to receive medically unnecessary treatments from the no-fault clinics. They also instructed the clinic doctors/straw owners to prescribe excessive and unwarranted referrals for various “modality treatments” for every patient they saw. The treatments included physical therapy, acupuncture, and chiropractic treatments—as many as five times per week for each—and treatments for psychology, neurology, orthopedics, and audiology. Clinic doctors also prescribed unnecessary MRI’s, x-rays, orthopedics, and medical supplies. The Clinic Controllers received thousands of dollars in kickbacks for patient referrals from the owners of the modality clinics (“Modality Controllers”), who were members and associates of the same criminal organization to which the members of the No-Fault Organization and Clinic Controllers belonged.


The Clinic Controllers also referred patients to personal injury lawyers who filed bogus lawsuits on behalf of the patients and coached them on what injuries to claim in order to get as many treatments as possible. The personal injury lawyers also paid the Clinic Controllers thousands of dollars in kickbacks for these referrals.


In order to conceal and disguise the millions of dollars in claims paid by the automobile insurance companies, the members of the No-Fault Organization laundered the money through shell companies and corrupt check-cashing services. Often, checks would be written from the No-Fault or Modality Clinics with the payee line left blank, and in amounts less than $10,000 in order to avoid potential financial institution reporting requirements and other scrutiny. The checks were then cashed through check-cashers who made the checks payable to shell companies they controlled in order to conceal the true nature and purpose of the checks. The cash was then returned to members of the No-Fault Organization to fund kickbacks and for their personal use. At other times, the members and associates of the No-Fault Organization paid themselves through their own shell companies and then used the criminal proceeds to fund expensive vacations and to purchase luxury goods.


***


A chart identifying each defendant, the charges, and the maximum penalties, is below. The case is assigned to U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetken.


U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara thanked the FBI and the NYPD for their work in the 18-month investigation, which he noted is ongoing. Mr. Bharara also thanked the National Insurance Crime Bureau and the investigative units of the insurance companies that provided invaluable assistance with the investigation, as well as the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.


The case is being prosecuted by the office’s Organized Crime Unit. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel S. Goldman, Nicholas L. McQuaid and Carolina Fornos are in charge of the prosecution. Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason L. Cowley of the office’s Asset Forfeiture Unit is responsible for the forfeiture of assets.


The charges contained in the indictment are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.


Prepared remarks of ADIC Fedarcyk at press conference























Count Charge Maximum Penalty
Count one RICO conspiracy (mail fraud and money laundering) 20 years
Count two Conspiracy to commit health care fraud 10 years
Count three Conspiracy to commit mail fraud 20 years
Count four Conspiracy to commit money laundering 20 years

































































































































































































































Defendant Age/Residence Alleged Role in the Scheme Charges Maximum Penalty
Mikhail Zemlyansky 35/Hewlett, NY Clinic/modality controller Counts one, two, three, four 70 years
Michael Danilovich 38/Brooklyn, NY Clinic/modality controller Counts one, two, three, four 70 years
Yuriy Zayonts 40/Staten Island, NY Clinic/modality controller Counts one, two, three, four 70 years
Mikhail Kremerman 41/Staten Island, NY Clinic/modality controller Counts one, two, three, four 70 years
Matthew Conroy 42/Melville, NY Attorney Counts one, two, three, four 70 years
Michael Barukhin 32/Brooklyn, NY Clinic/modality controller Counts one, two, three, four 70 years
Mikhail Ostrumsky 42/Brooklyn/NY Clinic controller Counts one, two, three, four 70 years
Boris Treysler 42/Brooklyn/NY Clinic controller Counts one, two, three, four 70 years
Andrey Anikeyev 37/Fort Lee, NJ Modality controller Counts two, three, four 50 years
Vladimir Grinberg 35/Staten Island, NY Modality controller Counts two, three, four 50 years
Vladislav Zaretskiy 40/Staten Island, NY Clinic/modality controller Counts two, three, four 50 years
Yevgeniy Shuman 33/Brooklyn, NY Clinic manager Counts two, three, four 50 years
Dmitry Slobodyansky 41/Brooklyn, NY Modality controller Counts two, three, four 50 years
Alexander Sandler 57/East Brunswick, NJ Clinic controller Counts two, three 30 years
Gregory Mikhalov 56/Brooklyn, NY Modality controller Counts two, three 30 years
Michael Morgan 33/Port Washington, NY Modality controller Counts two, three 30 years
Mark Danilovich 60/Brooklyn, NY Modality controller Counts two, three 30 years
Jeffrey Lereah 56/Suffern, NY Modality manager Counts two, three 30 years
Dmitry Lipis 44/Brooklyn, NY Clinic manager Counts two, three 30 years
Lynda Tadder 34/Brooklyn, NY Clinic manager Counts two, three 30 years
Maria Diglio 47/Garden City, NY Attorney Counts two, three 30 years
Sol Naimark 53/Flushing, NY Attorney Counts two, three 30 years
Sergey Gabinsky 54/Brooklyn, NY Doctor Counts two, three 30 years
Tatyana Gabinskaya 57/Brooklyn, NY Doctor Counts two, three 30 years
Joseph Vitoulis 42/Valley Stream, NY Doctor Counts two, three 30 years
Lauretta Grzegorczyk 64/Staten Island, NY Doctor Counts two, three 30 years
Eva Gateva 48/Bronx, NY Doctor Counts two, three 30 years
Zuheir Said 64/Bronx, NY Doctor Counts two, three 30 years
David Thomas 42/Hopewell Junction/NY Doctor Counts two, three 30 years
Billy Geris 53/Morganville, NJ Doctor Counts two, three 30 years
Mark Shapiro 46/Brooklyn, NY Doctor Counts two, three 30 years
Robert Della Badia 72/South Salem, NY Doctor Counts two, three 30 years
Michelle Glick 33/Duluth, MN Acupuncture practitioner Counts two, three 30 years
Pavel Poznansky 52/Brooklyn, NY Acupuncture practitioner Counts two, three 30 years
Chad Greenshner 45/Flushing, NY Chiropractic practitioner Counts two, three 30 years
Constantine Voytenko 40/Brooklyn, NY Chiropractic practitioner Counts two, three 30 years

Posted in Uncategorized

Thruway Authority Issues Myth Busters. Report on Tuesday Scoping

Hits: 0

WPCNR TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE BULLET. February 29, 2012:


The New York State Thruway issued 9 Myth Busters explaining what the proposed new Tappan Zee Bridge does and does not do. The primary myth, according to the release is that the proposed new bridge will Not include dedicated lane bus express service on the new bridge itself. It will.


Previously before New  York Governor Andrew Cuomo called for a scaled-down $5.2 Billion bridge, Michael Anderson, the project director told WPCNR two years ago, that the thruway planned Bus Rapid Transit for the previous bridge called for the I-287 corridor as presently constructed supporting a Bus Rapid Transit System with stations along the route.


Now according to the Myth Busters Sheet released today, the dedicated lane service on the new bridge will be the only rapid transit service feature of the bridge but not connecting to any other express lane on the Westchester side of the bridge and it would require 64 miles of construction in both counties. The Thruway release also notes there can be no mass transit system through Rockland and Westchester Counties without spending an additional $5.6 Billion and $80 Million a year to operate it.


The Myth Busters as released today by the New York State Thruway Authority:


The New York State Thruway Wednesday announced the release of these Myths vs. Facts about Mass Transit on the New Tappan Zee Bridge



 


MYTH: Mass transit is not part of the new Tappan Zee Bridge.


 


FACT: The new bridge will support mass transit including bus rapid transit and commuter rail — even before Rockland and Westchester Counties begin plans for a full mass transit system that could connect with the bridge.



 


MYTH: Mass transit options are far in the future.


 


FACT: The new bridge will have immediate, dedicated express bus service.



 


MYTH: Mass transit will never be part of the Tappan Zee Bridge.


 


FACT: The opposite is true. There can be no mass transit system without first building a new Tappan Zee bridge. The new bridge is being built to support bus and rail transit so that Rockland and Westchester can build a mass transit system to connect to the bridge.



 


MYTH: Mass transit can be built now.


 


FACT: A mass transit system in Rockland and Westchester requires 64 miles of construction in those counties at a cost of billions of dollars. There is no plan and no funding available to build a new mass transit system in the counties. However, if that changes, the new bridge will be able to accommodate it.



 


MYTH: We can afford to build mass transit now.


 


FACT: Building this separate mass transit system through Rockland and Westchester Counties would cost up to $5.3 billion and once the system was built it could cost $80 million to operate it. This means it could cost more to build and operate a separate mass transit system then to build the new Tappan Zee Bridge.



 


MYTH: We can afford to build mass transit now.


 


FACT: The $5.3 billion pricetag for a mass transit system means that the County Executives that want to build the system now will have to pay for it leading to the biggest tax and toll hike in Westchester and Rockland County history.



 


MYTH: A full mass transit system is a fundamental part of building a new Tappan Zee Bridge.


 


FACT: A full mass transit system would extend 64 miles from the bridge into Rockland and Westchester respectively. Currently the Counties have no plans in place to construct these 64 miles of mass transit. The entire bridge is only three miles and will support mass transit, if and when the Counties build it.



 


MYTH: There is no mass transit on the bridge now.


 


FACT: New York State already spends $2 million a year to provide Express Bus service across the Bridge, currently serving 499,000 riders per year and approximately 2,000 riders a day. The State will expand these services as market demand grows. However, numbers developed by New York’s Planning body currently show that only 5,900 additional riders would cross the bridge on future Bus Rapid Transit, and that could only happen if the systems are in place on either side.



 


MYTH: The new Tappan Zee Bridge being built for drivers only


 


FACT: The new Tappan Zee Bridge will include a pedestrian walkway and bike lanes, in addition to the dedicated express bus service.


 


Over 500 attended the Public Scoping Briefing on the New Tappan Zee Bridge Crossing Project at the Palisades Mall Center Tuesday evening. WPCNR filed this report on what it learned at that presentation:


WPCNR learned that there are no anticipated problems in obtaining steel for the bridge and if there are engineers told WPCNR (under condition of anonymity) that the bridge could be constructed of concrete. Our source did say though that steel construction was lighter than concrete and would be preferable because the Hudson Riverbed is soft. Engineering sources indicated to WPCNR that the cost of maintenance on the new bridge would be between $2.5 Million and $5 Million a year once the bridge is opened–however the prospective builders of the bridge will advise the actual cost of maintenance as part of their bids.


A Federal Highway Administration official in attendance referred WPCNR questions on when FHA funds would have to start being repaid to his public relations department in Washington. No new information on financing the bridge was provided at the meeting, and no information on possible toll increases was provided.


The speakers I heard felt that Mass Transit should be part of the bridge. Speakers also wanted more details and opportunity to comment before the environmental impact statement was closed. There was concern that unsafe entrances to the bridge in the Nyack area were not being addressed and made safer as part of the new construction.


The Supervisor of Orangetown and the Mayor of Nyack demanded to know how much tolls on the new bridge would be. The Mayor of South Nyack commented that the circular thruway staging area where DOT vehicles are now stored should be developed into a retail area to develop South Nyack; Irene Cornell, representing Rockland County and Rockland County Supervisor Scott Vanderhoef each called for Mass Transit to be part of the new bridge, Cornell demanded more comment period and analysis be done. A bus depot operator in Monroe, NY noted that his depot had experienced a 50% rise in bus traffic over the last year and urged that bus rapid transit not be left out of the bridge design, calling for a dedicated bus lane. At this point, there is no dedicated bus line incorporated in the bridge.


WPCNR notes that the new bridge at this point consists of two spans, 75 feet apart, providing room for mass transit between the bridges at a future date. There is a question as to whether the new bridge designed to be considerably higher than the present Tappan Zee Bridge would have support pilings 230 feet apart or 430 feet apart, which would be determined by the design of the winning bidder. Six homes would be destroyed on the Nyack side of the Hudson to construct the new bridge.


The hearing was scheduled to begin at 5 P.M. with a full room of speakers eager to speak. However,40 minutes taken up by DOT, MTA and Army Corps of Engineers commenting on protocols and niceties and DOT Project Manager Mochael Anderson’s recap of the charts available for the public to learn about the bridge. At 5:55 P.M. comments were opened with a series of politicians speaking first, who reiterated written remarks that presumably all had handed in for the record previously.


One of those speaking was White Plains Councilperson Milagros Lecouna who is leading the Tappan Zee Bridge park movement. Lecouna stressed the need for a dedicated bus lane at the new bridge opening, saying not to include it was “planning for the past.” Lecouna also estimated that destruction of the old Tappan Zee would cost much more than the $150 Million estimated, and this was a good reason for turning the old bridge into a park. Engineers present did not wish to comment to WPCNR on whether the old bridge could physically support the weight of trees or businesses (such as hotels and restaurants) on its structure. Westchester County Executive Robert Astorino, and no one representing him, did not address the hearing


The public did not begin to speak until 6:40 P.M. when all the politicians were finished speaking.

Posted in Uncategorized

New Tappan Zee Toll Would Have to Double to Meet Estimated Debt Service

Hits: 0

 


 


WPCNR QUILL & EYESHADE. By John F. Bailey. February 28, 2012:


 


I have been fitting my mind around the stratospheric numbers involved in financing the new Tappan Zee Bridge.


 


Under the current plan for paying for the bridge,  the cost of handling the debt service on $6 Billion to build the Governor Andrew Cuomo Bridge would raise the new Tappan Zee Bridge toll to $11.50, and that is conservative.


 


WPNCR using standard municipal loan projects provided by the Municipal Capital Markets Group, notes that to handle the debt service on $6 Billion of loans at 3.11% (this week’s current bargain rate from TIVIA), the New York State Thruway Authority would have to pay $196 Million in debt service a year for 35 years in a combination of public and private financing, beginning in 2022, or earlier.


To handle this load through tolls as the governor suggests, at a minimum demands an increase to  $11.50 a trip on the New Tappan Zee by 2022, the year the TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) loan for $2 Billion would start having to be repaid, if the most favorable terms are granted New York State.


 


If financing through other sources at the same interest rates could be arranged with payback starting in 2022 in the TIFIA loan, or earlier the bulk of the financing would have to start being paid earlier.


 


Here is what the initial cost of the bridge will roughly be if the state borrows $6 Billion. There is also the possibility of borrowing from state pension funds, another option put out by the governor. These figures are derived from the Municipal Capital Markets Group  Municipal Bond Issue Calculator


 


Funds Needed: $6 Billion


Term:  35 Years (payback in a TIFIA loan begins in 2022)


Interest: 3.11 % (current TIFIA rate)


 


Net Monthly Payment (beginning in 2022): $16.3 Million


Annual Payment over 35 years:  $195,657,912


 


The Thruway Authority in their Letter of Interest to apply for a TIFIA, said the state would need $1.5 Billion over the next decade to keep the old Tappan Zee Bridge active ($150 Million a year). That would add 65 Cents per trip to the present Tappan Zee Bridge toll.


 


The Letter of Interest did not say what the regular maintenance costs of the bridge are, so lets raise the toll $1 to $6 for the 50 million trips across the bridge a year (45 million trips were made in 2010).


 


Beginning in 2022, the state will have to begin paying back the $6 Billion in loans, unless of course the non-TIFIA financing  from private sources  ($4 Billion) has to begin to be paid back earlier by the state. To simplify matters, let us assume the governor can extract favorable terms that dovetail the start-pay dates to 2022.


 


The thruway has to generate $195,657,912 in annual debt service beginning in 2022, or earlier, plus costs of maintaining the new bridge, whatever that may be , let’s say $150 Million, keeping expenses of maintenance the same (assuming they will go up due to inflation). The toll would have to go up 130%


 


The  $5 toll would have to more than double to cover the cost of the debt service $5 to $11.50 one way.


 


Now bear in mind, the $6 Billion cost is estimated right now. The designated qualified contractors may come in higher.


 


Either way from a rough numbers standpoint, I would guess that the New Tappan Zee will be the most expensive toll in the metropolitan area if not the country, rivaling the Chesapeake Bay Bridge tunnel – five years from now – if it is finished.


 


Last week, Governor Cuomo told his cabinet the bridge will be paid for by a $2 Billion in TIFIA funds and $4 Billion in toll-financed loans. It was the first time the state had indicated that the $2 Billion and change money promised from Washington last fall was a loan, not a grant.


 


Other matters that need to be clarified very quickly and should be considered by any thinking transit executive are whether the state should use the opportunity to raise tolls to inflate the bridge cash flow now to ease commuters into the new bridge toll shock. They could raise the toll in increments to provide for the new bridge future. They could decide to raise tolls to


 


1.) Pay for the increased maintenance of the old TZB while NTZB is built.


 


2.)  To build a fund for the “down-the-road” mass transit option—bus rapid transit or rail—to add the mass transit piece to the new bridge as quickly as possible, shortly after it is scheduled to open in 2017.


 


3.) Build additional operating funds to pay down loans faster, hold tolls steady after the new bridge opens.


 


4.) Provide excess cash for unforeseen cost overruns. (an intriguing way the state could come up with found- money.)


 


5.)The MTA could grab a share of the tolls for its expansion of bus and rail that the Governor promises will be added to  the new bridge.


 


6.) Generate intriguing money for the always beleaugured state general fund to get the state over cost crunches. All they have to do is legislate it.


 


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized