WHITE PLAINS CITIZENETREPORTER SETS RECORD VISITS FOR YEAR 7,017,658 VISITS! 2,098,003 VISITORS MADE 6 VISITS A DAY EVERY DAY. 63,330 UNIQUE VISITORS MADE 133,730 VISITS IN DECEMBER. WPCNR AVERAGED 17,284 VISITORS A WEEK, VISITING 31,270 TIMES.

Hits: 0

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. August 1,2012 UPDATED 11:23 P.M. E.D.T.:

A decision on to bond for $34 Million or $48 Million in school building maintenance in 2013 and a Teachers Contract Settlement appear likely this month.

The White Plains  Board of Education met Monday evening to discuss recommendations  of the District Finance Committee on extensive maintenance projects for six schools in the district.

Supertintendent of Schools Dr. Christopher Clouet told WPCNR after the public session of the meeting that no decision to schedule a bond referendum this fall had been reached. He said the Board would tour Eastview School within the next two weeks to consider the roof repairs and building exterior work suggested, a total of $8.4 Million. 

The Superintendent expressed optimism that a settlement on a new contract with the teachers would happen before the start of the school year. Kerry Broderick, President of the Teachers union told WPCNR Wednesday evening, “We are negotiating language changes as well as salary and benefits. All of these are difficult and since they are negotiated as a package, they are all tightly linked. Sorry, I can’t be more specific than that at this time.”

Tuesday afternoon Ms. Broderick confirmed that the negotiating atmosphere had changed

Consensus of the Board  despite much handringing over the 1% property tax increase it would mean during discussion Monday night leaned toward doing the work for all the elementary schools, high school and middle schools . 

To execute both Plans ($30 Million for priority maintenance for the elementaries, high school and middle schools and  roughly $15 Million for the second plan including wiring for WI-FI wireless capability in all district buildings at a cost of $5.8 Million) beginning next summer  would require a referendum to finance $48 Million in new school debt in October.

The Board has decided to tour Eastview School and decide based on their tour whether to vote to fund $34 Million or $48 Million on August 13, Clouet indicated, amounts subject to vary depending on what the Board finds.

Members of the board were told by the Buildings and Grounds Supertindent that financing is at an historic low in interest rates and the maintenance done now would be most advantageous for the district.

Teacher Negotiations Expected to Settle by Start of School

The Board of Education then  went into a Executive Session to discuss teacher contract negotiations which have been at an impasse according to Kerry Broderick, President of the White Plains Teachers Association.

Superintendent of Schools Clouet left the Executive Session at 10 P.M., and WPCNR asked him about the teacher negotiations status and how teachers pay is being affected now that they are without a contract.

Clouet said the teachers who are not at the ceiling of pay would receive their usual step pay   increase for their additional year of longevity. However, Clouet said teachers currently at ceiling pay levels already would not receive a step increase, of which “there are a lot,” Clouet said.

Asked if the negotiations were still at an impasse, Clouet said the atmosphere had thawed and the district and teachers were talking and that he hoped for a settlement before the start of the school year.

Kerry Broderick, Teachers Union President, confirmed this to WPCNR in a e-mailed statement Tuesday afternoon.

“We are still at impasse and mediation is scheduled for August 16th.  These negotiations are not contentious, so we continued to try to resolve our differences during the summer.  However, both sides agree that a neutral third party will help us.  I am optimistic we will settle.

Hits: 0

WPCNR FBI WIRE. Special to WPCNR from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. July 31, 2012:

Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that the United States has entered into settlement agreements with PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker—two of three online poker companies sued by the U.S. in a money laundering and forfeiture complaint that was originally filed in April 2012—that were approved today by U.S. District Judge Leonard B. Sand.

Under the terms of the settlement with Full Tilt Poker (“Full Tilt”), the company agreed to forfeit virtually all of its assets to the U.S. to fully resolve the charges in the complaint.

Under the terms of the settlement with PokerStars, the company agreed to forfeit $547 million to the U.S. and to reimburse the approximately $184 million owed by Full Tilt to foreign players in order to fully resolve the allegations in the complaint. The settlement further provides that PokerStars will acquire the forfeited Full Tilt assets from the government. Full Tilt’s U.S. fraud victims will be able to seek compensation for their losses from the Department of Justice from the $547 million forfeited by PokerStars.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said,

“We are pleased to announce these settlements by Full Tilt Poker and PokerStars, which allow us to quickly get significant compensation into the victim players’ hands. Today’s settlements demonstrate that if you engage in conduct that violates the laws of the United States, as we alleged in this case, then even if you are doing so from across the ocean, you will have to answer for that conduct and turn over your ill-gotten gains.”

“Today’s forfeiture is another important step in the FBI’s investigation, allowing for serious compensation of victims. This should serve as a deterrent to others who look to actively circumvent United States law—onshore or offshore, you will be held responsible for those actions. Pokerstars and Full Tilt bet the house on their illicit scheme; fortunately, we were holding the trump card,” said FBI Assistant Director Janice K. Fedarcyk.

Under the terms of the settlement with Full Tilt, U.S. victims of the company’s alleged fraud will be able to seek compensation from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The funds that will be used to compensate qualifying victims will come from the $547 million that will be forfeited by PokerStars as part of its settlement with the government.

In addition to forfeiting $547 million to the U.S., under the terms of the settlement with PokerStars, the company must make available to foreign players all balances that were held in the Full Tilt accounts within 90 days; the amount of those balances is approximately $184 million.

Pokerstars will also acquire the forfeited Full Tilt assets from the government. PokerStars’ acquisition of the forfeited Full Tilt assets will be complete upon the government’s receipt of a $225 million payment from PokerStars, which must take place within six days of the entrance of today’s settlement.

Additional terms of the PokerStars settlement include:

• Within 45 days of the acquisition of the forfeited Full Tilt assets, Isai Scheinberg, who is presently under indictment in a related criminal case, shall not serve in any management or director role at PokerStars. This provision is subject to re-evaluation by the parties upon the resolution of the criminal case.
  
• PokerStars is also prohibited from employing, or otherwise hiring, Full Tilt Poker insiders Raymond Bitar, Howard Lederer, Rafael Furst, Chris Ferguson, and Nelson Burtnick. Bitar and Burtnick are also named as defendants in a related criminal Indictment. Bitar, Lederer, Furst, and Ferguson are named as civil money-laundering defendants in this complaint.
  
• PokerStars is prohibited from offering online poker in the U.S. for real money unless and until it is legal to do so under U.S. law.
  
• The government will maintain a portion of the $547 million forfeited by PokerStars as a substitute for the forfeited Full Tilt assets to cover the litigation of claims by other parties asserting interests in the forfeited Full Tilt assets.

The settlements entered today with regard to Full Tilt Poker and PokerStars, and the proposed settlement with regard to Absolute Poker, do not constitute admissions of any wrongdoing, culpability, liability, or guilt by any parties. Under the terms of a “domain name use” agreement entered into between PokerStars and the government on April 20, 2011, the company previously settled its accounts with U.S. players.

In a related matter, the U.S. Attorney’s Office also filed a motion requesting that the court enter a settlement agreement reached with Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet that requires the company to forfeit all of its assets in order to fully resolve this action.

The motion also requests that the government be permitted to liquidate the Absolute assets, with the net proceeds of that sale to be held pending the resolution of claims filed by other parties who have asserted an ownership interest in the Absolute assets.

The following allegations are based on the Amended Civil Forfeiture Complaint filed in September and the indictments returned in the related criminal action:

On October 13, 2006, the United States enacted the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA), making it a federal crime for gambling businesses to “knowingly accept” most forms of payment “in connection with the participation of another person in unlawful Internet gambling.”

Despite the passage of the UIGEA, Full Tilt Poker, PokerStars, and Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet (the poker companies), each located offshore, continued operating in the United States.

Because U.S. banks and credit card issuers were largely unwilling to process their payments, the poker companies allegedly used fraudulent methods to circumvent federal law and deceive these financial institutions into processing payments on their behalf.

 For example, the poker companies arranged for the money received from U.S. gamblers to be disguised as payments to hundreds of non-existent online merchants purporting to sell merchandise such as jewelry and golf balls. Of the billions of dollars in payment transactions that the poker companies deceived U.S. banks into processing, approximately one-third or more of the funds went directly to the poker companies as revenue through the “rake” charged to players on almost every poker hand played online.

To accomplish their fraud, the poker companies worked with an array of highly compensated “payment processors” who obtained accounts at U.S. banks for the poker companies.

The payment processors lied to banks about the nature of the financial transactions they were processing and covered up those lies, by, among other things, creating phony corporations and websites to disguise payments to the poker companies.

For example, a PokerStars document from May 2009 acknowledged that they received money from U.S. gamblers through company names that “strongly imply the transaction has nothing to do with PokerStars” and that PokerStars used whatever company names “the processor can get approved by the bank.”

Full Tilt Poker further defrauded players by misrepresenting that player funds on deposit in online gambling accounts were safe, secure, and available for withdrawal at any time.

In reality, the company did not maintain funds sufficient to repay all players and, instead, utilized players’ funds to distribute more than $400 million to Full Tilt’s owners.

By March 31, 2011, two weeks before the initial complaint in this action was unsealed, Full Tilt Poker owed approximately $390 million to players around the world, including approximately $160 million to players in the United States.

At that time, Full Tilt Poker had only approximately $60 million on deposit in its bank accounts.

Full Tilt Poker’s scheme continued even after the civil forfeiture action commenced and the related criminal indictment was unsealed in April 2011. Full Tilt Poker continued accepting foreign player funds despite the fact that it had liabilities to players around the world for over $300 million yet held only a small fraction of that amount in its bank accounts.

Eleven defendants were charged criminally in connection with the original Internet poker indictment, seven of whom have been arrested.

The defendants who have been arrested are: Raymond Bitar, Bradley Franzen, Ryan Lang, Ira Rubin, Brent Beckley, Chad Elie, and John Campos.

All seven defendants except Bitar have each pled guilty and await sentencing with the exception of Campos, who was sentenced in June 2012 to three months in prison. Charges are still pending against the remaining four defendants—Nelson Burtnick, Isai Scheinberg, Paul Tate, and Scott Tom—who remain at large. The charges and accusations against them are allegations, and they are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara praised the FBI for its outstanding leadership in the investigation, which he noted is ongoing.

This matter is being handled by the Office’s Asset Forfeiture and Complex Frauds Unit. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sharon Cohen Levin, Michael Lockard, Jason Cowley, and Andrew Goldstein are in charge of the civil money laundering and forfeiture action. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Arlo Devlin-Brown, Nicole Friedlander and Niketh Velamoor are in charge of the criminal case.

Hits: 0

WPCNR NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH. From the Carhart Neighborhood Association  July 30,2012 UPDATED WITH PICTURE OF SITE:

On July 17^th the Planning Board voted to recommend to the Common Council that they issue a special use permit and approve site plans for Sunrise Detox Center to operate a 31-33 bed facility at 37 De Kalb Avenue (the former site of the Nathan Miller nursing home) (below).

The proposed drug and alcohol detox center would be located in a quiet residential neighborhood with several elementary school bus stops within a few blocks including one on the same corner. There is also a special education day program at St. Matthew’s church two blocks away servicing developmentally disabled individuals.

There are also several liquor stores and drug stores within a short walk of the proposed site.

Fears over safety concerns have been fueled by reported police logs of assaults (including sexual) as well as several missing persons at the two existing Sunrise detox facilities in Florida and New Jersey.

This issue will come before the White Plains Common Council at their next meeting on Monday August 6^th and all concerned citizens are urged to appear at 6:30 PM at the Municipal Building 255 Main Street- 2^nd Floor to voice their opposition to this project.

In conjunction with an extensive White Plains wide petition drive, there is an online petition available at www.ipetitions.com/petition/no-detox.

A Public Hearing on this matter will most probably be set for the September 4  Common Council meeting, (not September 10, as previously stated).

For additional information, please contact the Carhart Neighborhood Association at nodetox@gmail.com

Hits: 0

WPCNR TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE NEWS. Special to WPCNR From the New York State Thruway Authority. July 27, 2012:

 At 5:30 P.M. Friday afternoon, Brian Conybeare, Special Advisor the Governor on the New Tappan Zee Bridge, issued this statement:

“Today the Thruway Authority received three proposals for building a new bridge to replace the Tappan Zee. The proposals comprise more than 70 boxes and an estimated 750,000 pages. The submitted bids are from the following teams:

Kiewit-Skanska-Weeks Joint Venture

(Kiewit Infrastructure Co., Skanska USA Civil Northeast Inc., and Weeks Marine, Inc.)

Tappan Zee Bridge Partners, a Bechtel/Tutor Perini Joint Venture

(Bechtel Infrastructure Corporation and Tutor Perini Corporation)

Tappan Zee Constructors

(Fluor Enterprises, Inc., American Bridge Company, Granite Construction Northeast, Inc., and Traylor Bros., Inc.)

The first stage involves reviewing the proposals for completeness and compliance before the proposals are deemed accepted for substantive selection review, a process expected to take four weeks given the massive volume of material. Additional information regarding the selection process that will begin in four weeks will be available next week, and the process will be open and transparent as federal procurement law will allow.”

Hits: 0

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. From Con Edison. July 27, 2012:

 Con Edison crews have restored almost all of the 4,800 customers that were affected by last evening’s severe storms.

As of 4:45 a.m. only 35 customers remained out of service, 19 of them in Yonkers.

Outages peaked between 8 p.m. and 9 p.m. last evening. Over 75 percent of those who lost service from the storm were restored by midnight.

During today’s sweltering heat wave, Con Edison reported a new electric peak for 2012 of 12,836 megawatts (MW) at 1 p.m. Thursday, surpassing Wednesday’s high of 12,455 megawatts at 6 p.m.