More Officials Buy In to the New Tappan Zee Bridge

Hits: 0

WPCNR TAPPAN ZEE NEWS. From the Office of Governor Andrew M. Cuomo. August 8, 2012: 


 Governor Andrew Cuomo announced additional support from state legislators  Rohert Castelli and Sandy Galef and town supervisors in Rockland and Westchester Counties for current plans to build a new bridge to replace the Tappan Zee, including Assemblyman Robert J. Castelli (R, C – Goldens Bridge). This is in addition to support earlier this week from former Westchester County Executives Andy Spano and Alfred Delbello.


“Support for a new bridge to replace the obsolete Tappan Zee continues to grow as we meet with Hudson Valley residents to discuss why building a new crossing is the smartest option,” Governor Cuomo said. “The new bridge will be safer, less congested and ready to handle mass transit, and the project will create much-needed jobs in the region.”


“The facts are clear regarding the Tappan Zee: It makes no sense to continue to spend hundreds of millions of tollpayer dollars on a bridge that does not meet our needs now or in the future,” Castelli said. “Instead, it is time to proceed with Governor Cuomo’s plan to build a new bridge that will serve our region’s transportation needs into the next century. “We have talked about this for fifteen years; the time for talking is over, it’s time to build the bridge.”


“There is no simple solution to our region’s ‘Tappan Zee problem.’ Either we spend billions to refurbish the existing bridge, or spend a little more to build a new, transit-ready crossing designed to handle more vehicles in a safer driving environment. The smart choice is obvious, and I support the plan to build a new bridge now,” said Assemblywoman Sandy Galef.


“The best way to provide relief to Tappan Zee commuters is to move forward now with Governor’s Cuomo plan to build a new bridge that will have commuter bus lanes from the day it opens and will be built to accommodate whatever mass transit options our communities decide to pursue in future years. This project will also create 45,000 much needed local jobs that would have great positive impact on our regional economy,” said Assemblywoman Shelley Mayer.


“The smart and responsible option is to make a long-term investment by building a new, transit-ready bridge that will offer better service for bus commuters right away. Continuing to invest in the existing, obsolete bridge will be almost as costly and will not address the problems that Rockland County commuters face every day,” said Ramapo Town Supervisor Christopher St. Lawrence.


“Governor Cuomo’s plan to replace the Tappan Zee will give drivers a less congested and safer way to cross the Hudson, and will support an estimated 45,000 much-needed jobs in our region. No other alternative offers these benefits for our communities,” said Clarkstown Town Supervisor Alex Gromack.


“A thoughtful look at the options for the Tappan Zee makes it obvious that Governor’s Cuomo’s plan is the best way to proceed. It would be irresponsible to continue to spend hundreds of millions to maintain an obsolete bridge when we can make a wise long-term investment in a new, safer, transit-ready crossing,” said Haverstraw Town Supervisor Howard T. Phillips.


New Yorkers can see toll options and submit questions and concerns about the project by visiting www.NewNYBridge.com or calling the toll free number, 855-TZBRIDGE. The website also features videos of the community meetings and a database of all documents created over the last 10 years on the Tappan Zee Bridge. A Twitter account has been set up for the Tappan Zee project, and New Yorkers can receive updates by following @NewNYBridge.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Hearings Set 4 Rec Zone; FASNY. Campus Office Mix Use OK’d. Habel May Return

Hits: 0

WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL CHRONICLE EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey. August6, 2012. UPDATED AUGUST 8, 2012 UPDATED AUGUST 8, 2012 11:20 A.M. E.D.T.UPDATED AUGUST 8, 5 P.M. E.D.T.:


Viewers observing the Monday evening Common Council meeting saw the city take key steps forward into the development  (or lack thereof)  for some of the last remaining private tracts to develop in White Plains.


Viewers also saw Councilman David Buchwald thank former Commissioner of Planning Susan Habel for her service,(who retired Friday without a successor being named), indicating that the city may be calling on Ms. Habel’s  expertise in the future without elaborating.


Mr. Buchwald took the time, at the end of the consent agenda  segment to praise Ms. Habel’s service to the city:


“I want to note that in our agenda .this is the last item in our agenda before we get to the public hearings, and it is the last item to which the signature of our just-retired Commissioner of Planning,Susan Habel, has put her name. And, I want to thank her for her work on this particular issue (solar energy) and for her contributions over a very distinguished career here in the city of White Plains. She’s a resident of the city,dedicated to it, in many ways she will continue to enjoy the fruits of her labor on behalf of the city. On behalf  of the entire Common Council, I want to extend our gratitude to  her and I wish her best of luck in her continued enjoyment of her semi-retirement. We’re not letting her completely go because we all hope that she’ll continue to provide some institutional knowledge and perspective on things that are going on in the city. But I did want to thank her again for her years in the Planning Department and prior to that.”


The Council set the stage for opening up the office campuses along Westchester Avenue for new development to supplement the campuns office properties  currently suffering from a high vacancy rate.


They approved a Campus Office District mixed-use zoning change allowing housing, scientific uses, research and limited retail use. Each property owner would be required to submit a unique “overlay” master plan for their properties subject to approval by the Common Council. Mayor Thomas Roach told the public “we already have committals,” without elaborating.


The Common Council approved hearings to receive public input on the Open Space Recreational Ordinance  setting requirements for privately owned golf course properties in the city for September 4. Councilpersons urged residents to come out and make their views known on the ordinance.  Gwo consecuive public hearings on the French American School of New York project to build a school campus  on the former Ridgeway Country Club were also approved for September 19, 7 PM and October 17, also at 7 PM.


Councilman Benjamin Boykin said the setting of the public hearing was merely accepting the Draft Environmental Impact Statement as complete, and “didn’t necessarily mean we (the council) agreed with them.” Boykin said now it was the public’s turn to comment and that the council would hear input on the project “for as long as it takes,” and would be thorough.


The council also approved the first step in the ongoing Winbrook Revitalization Project, approving a 10-story building,housing an Educ ation Center , which will be built first, however funding is only available for the first floor housing the education center on the first floor. The city is funding $1.5 Million of the project and the Housing and Urban Development, $3,500,000 as of this spring.


Wednesday after the Housing and Urban Development press office in New York confirmed to WPCNR, HUD is still funding the $3.5 Million “only for the education facility,” the spokesman explained.


During the hearing on the Winbrook project, William Null, the attorney for the enterprise said in response to a question by Council President Beth Smayda that plans for subsequent buildings in the project would be submitted on a project-by-project basis and built individually according to the individual’s financial model, and not as part of a connected project. Design, Null said would depend on whom the Housing Authority was working with to develop each building in the future, so, Null suggested that it was somewhat impossible to present the kind of comprehensive plan that Smayda suggested.


Smayda asked about the amount key finding agencies the Housing Authority was providing. The architect for the project stepped up to say that the Authority had not applied for the financing yet, because it needed tonight’s approval to do so and would be applying to state agencies for tax credit financing after approval.


The Housing and Urban Development agency in Washington told the authority in the spring of this year, its funds were no longer available for financing the entire project.TO read that story click on http://whiteplainscnr.com/article9115.html


Smayda expressed concern about a future environmental review of the effect on the infrastructure of the city since the Environmental Officer of the City had requested one. Null said that since the entire project was replacing what was already there, it was the Housing Authority position that a new environmental review was not necessary, but the Authority was willing to consider it.


It also became clear that the first building setting the tone for the project would be made up exclusively of present Winbrook residents. Milagros Lecuona, the Councilwoman, emphasized that she wanted the  project (as it was originally envisioned) to be mixed income. Mack Carter, Executive Director of the Housing Authority stepped up and said that the first building is now being financed hopefully as a tax credit project which required that the building be low and moderate income housing only similar to present Winbrook Housing tenant income levels and that mixed income levels could not be accommodated, though incomes would vary in the building based on Winbrook tenants moving in (when the residential portion of  the building is completed, which still has to be financed).


Smayda asked if co-op or condominium ownership would be available. Null said that they are not prohibited from that, but it is not being considered at this time.


Outdoor dining was approved for Esposito’s Restaurant on a rooftop deck, and outdoor patio dining was approved for Noodles Restaurant.


The Council authorized the purchase of a third one-man garbage truck for $250,000 and 100,000 containers to go with the truck. Councilman John Martin and Council President Beth Smayda lauded the one-arm, one-man truck system of collecting garbage as a money-saving long-term move.


However to date the Common Council and the Department of Public Works have not said how much savings the new truck system in effect with the first in-service truck have achieved in dollars or how long it will be before the trucks payout in savings long-term. There has been talk about saving costs on labor but how that saving is achieved (other than reassignment of personnel) has not been defined. The truck in service has mainly been a “neat” thing.


The Council also voted to purchase 200 Westchester Avenue  for $500,000.

Posted in Uncategorized

The Bombing of Hirosima Took Place 67 Years ago Today

Hits: 0

 


 


WPCNR MILESTONES. August 6, 2012:


  


Sixty-seven years ago, the Enola Gay, a single American bomber dropped an Atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The terrible effects of that single bomb are a horror that has never been repeated


 


A second bomber, Bock’s Car on August 9, dropped a similar bomb on Nagasaki. Unknown thousands of Japanese citizens’ lives were vaporized, burned,  and maimed and two cities leveled to the ground in an instant in both bombings.


 


To grasp what one atomic bomb did to Nagasaki. Readers may see the photographs Japanese photographer Yosuki Yamato took of the aftermath of Nagasaki the day it happened at http://www.exploratorium.edu/nagasaki/photos.html#journey/63.jpg


 


The decision to drop the bombs was made after the United States, Great Britain and the Republic of China demanded Japan  surrender in the Potsdam Declaration on July 26 or face  “prompt and utter destruction”. The Japanese government did not.


 


The United States deployed two nuclear weapons  dropping one on Hiroshimi today, 67 years ago and one on Nagasaki on August 9.


 


Over four months the bombs resulted in the deaths of   90,000–166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000–80,000 in Nagasaki, half dying the day the bombs fell.


 


The Hiroshima prefecture health department estimated that, of the people who died on the day of the explosion, 60% died from flash or flame burns, 30% from falling debris and 10% from other causes. During the following months, large numbers died from the effect of burns, radiation sickness, and other injuries, compounded by illness. In a US estimate of the total immediate and short term cause of death, 15–20% died from radiation sickness, 20–30% from burns, and 50–60% from other injuries, compounded by illness. In both cities, most of the dead were civilians, although Hiroshima had a sizeable garrison.


The horror of those two bombings and the aftermath, the injuries have created  an effort and reluctance on the part of nuclear-armed powers to avoid any nuclear attacks since that date.


Within a few days of those bombings, Japan surrendered unconditionally, officially ending World War II.


 


The decision to use the bombs by the United States has long been debated. A dialogue on what the bombs did, why the decision was made was collected in 1995, the fiftieth year since the bombings. It is available at http://www.exploratorium.edu/nagasaki/commentary/decision.html

Posted in Uncategorized

Astorino:Tripling New TZB Tolls Needs Better Mass Transit NOW. Gov Defends Tolls

Hits: 0

WPCNR TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE NEWS. AUGUST 4, 2012:


Governor Andrew M.Cuomo issued perhaps the shortest “reaction” statement of his term today, defending tripling of the Tappan Zee Bridge Tolls. His office late Friday afternoon issued this statement on the Governor’s website:


“On the cost the choice is clear — a new better bridge will require about the same tolls as just fixing the old bridge and about half the toll of a new bridge plus a new bus system,” stated Governor Cuomo.


In reaction to Governor Cuomo’s endorsement today of  a tripling of the tolls (to $14 for cash payers; $13.30 for EZ PASS Holders and $8.50 for Commuters)  on the new Tappan Zee Bridge, the County Executive of Westchester County, Robert P. Astorino issued this statement through Phil Oliva, a spokesman;


“The new toll amount underscores the need for some type of mass transit and we are working with the governor’s office on a framework for what can be done immediately in regards to bus rapid transit and what can be done mid to long term,”


This evening, WNYC Radio ran audio of Governor Cuomo supporting the toll increase on the grounds that fixing the old bridge would cost the same amount about $12 a trip, and repeating his stance that the bridge is going to built, it has to be built.


Paul Feiner, Greenburgh Town Supervisor released this statement in reacton to the shock at the Governor’s Secretary Larry Swartz making public the new toll amounts (which this website predicted five months ago).


“Greenburgh Town Supervisor Paul Feiner is calling for a summit of elected officials from Westchester/Rockland to discuss the projected toll rate hikes once the new Tappan Zee bridge is built.  The state is now estimating that tolls on the Tappan Zee bridge could jump to  close to $14 in December 2014. (WPCNR is checking with Mr. Feiner as to if this is true.)Tolls are expected to almost triple from the current amount.  There would be discounts for commuters who would pay in the neighborhood of $8.40 to cross the 3 mile span.


The Tappan Zee bridge should not be a bridge for only the rich, said Feiner. The projected increases are excessive –especially without bus or mass transit. This will be a tremendous burden for lower income residents of both counties, for seniors and young people. The state would set the income guidelines to qualify. The Tappan Zee bridge projected toll hikes make the bridge unaffordable for many.


A possible suggestion (in addition to lobbying for mass transit/bus service)….a new discount card for commuters who are on fixed incomes. A photo id card could be issued to those who qualify. They would show the card to toll collectors and pay the reduced fares.


Westchester/Rockland residents currently subsidize Buffalo residents who receive a significant discount on the Grand Island bridge. Grand Island residents pay 9 cents to cross the bridge. Non residents pay $1 per trip. Why does the Thruway Authority give residents of the Buffalo area a big discount  on their local bridge and not do the same for residents of Westchester/Rockland? 


Feiner is planning to write to the Governor, the Westcheste/Rockland delegation to the NYS Legislature and to local officials requesting a meeting.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

State: New TZB Toll About $14 Exceeding WPCNR Conservative Estimate

Hits: 0

WPCNR TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE NEWS. August 4, 2012:


A state official last night told persons attending a Tappan Zee Bridge public meeting that tolls on the new Tappan Zee Bridge, optimistically predicted by the state to be constructed and opened about 2017 would be about $3 more than predicted by WPCNR in a rough estimate last February.


At the Rockland County Tappan Zee Bridge public meeting to inform Rockland residents on the latest Tappan Zee Bridge facts and figures (the meeting had been scheduled for last Thursday had been postponed), Secretary to Governor Andrew Cuomo, White Plains’ Larry Schwartz stated that tolls for the new Tappan Zee Bridge would be appoximately $14 with discounts to “commuters” of $8.40 and E-Z Pass holders $13.50 per trip.


Schwartz said the toll would be $12 if the old bridge had been upgraded.


AS OF 3:15 P.M., Governor Andrew Cuomo’s new Tappan Zee Bridge website, www.newnybridge.com has not posted any news release detailing this important new information divulged by Mr. Schwartz last night at the Rockland County public meeting.


Schwartz’s estimate comes after WPCNR had republished its prediction of five months ago that a rough toll would have to be about $11.50 to cover the debt service of the $5.2 to $6.2 Million the state will have to borrow to build the bridge.


As an aid, WPCNR had calculated in February that to finance $6.2 Billion through the TIFIA program,  at its current rate and pay the maintenance costs of the new bridge, tolls would have to go up to $11.50 a Trip. To read that commentary go to  www.whiteplainscnr.com/article9023.html

Posted in Uncategorized

ENTER THE AGENDA: FASNY DEIS COMPLETE BY COMMON COUNCIL SO FAR. Open Space Rec D

Hits: 0

 


 


WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE EXAMINER. AUGUST 3, 2012:


 


The Common Council as Friday morning dawned has apparently not found anything to quibble about in the French American School of New York Final Draft Environmental Impact Statement  on the school proposed campus on the defunct Ridgeway Golf Club site.


 


 The agenda just published for Monday evening at 7:30 has a resolution having the Common Council accepting the document as complete and  setting a two-session public hearing on the Final Draft Environmental Impact Statement September 19 at 7 PM and October 17 ay 7 PM.


 


The council had been informed Monday evening that unless they found analysis of some issues incomplete that the time frame of the SEQR timetable would be violated. Steven Silverberg, one of the outside legal counsel to the city on the FASNY matter, noted this to the Council. As of Friday morning the Council apparently has not found an issue that would postpone the acceptance of the DEIS. They have three days to do so. All city department heads have reviewed the FASNY Final DEIS and judged it complete.


 


The Agenda in addition contains a resolution setting a public hearing for September 4 on the application approved by the Planning Board to build a detox center in the former Nathan Miller Nursing Home at 37 DeKalb Avenue.


 


Public hearings of  interest planned  to take place Monday include a hearing on the White Plains Housing Authority to build its first building in the process of rebuilding the Winbrook complex to a height of 10 stories at the corner of South Lexington Avenue and Quarropas Streets.


 


The public hearing on the proposed Open Space Recreation District Zoning that would not permit housing subdivisions  and  would restrict institution-type buildings with extensive setback regulations on the following three privately owned golf course properties:the defunct Ridgeway Golf Club property now owned by the French American School of New York, Westchester Hills Golf Club and the portion of Fenway Golf Club located within White Plains.


 


The Complete Agenda follows:



COMMON COUNCIL


AGENDA


REGULAR STATED MEETING


AUGUST 6, 2012


7:30 P.M.


PLEDGE TO THE FLAG: Hon. David Buchwald


ROLL CALL: City Clerk


RECOGNITION: White Plains Performing Arts Center


Summer Program


Joseph’s Villardi “Good Humor Joe Day”


Longest Serving Good Humor Man


in the United States


Serving White Plains Residents for 59 Years


ADJOURNED


PUBLIC HEARINGS:


1. Public Hearing in relation to the application submitted by City Place Trattoria Inc.,


d/b/a Pranzi Ristorante, for a Special Permit to operate a cabaret at 8 City Place.


2. Communication from the City Clerk


3. Public Hearing in relation to the application submitted on behalf of the MAK


Corporation for a renewal of a Special Permit to operate a cabaret on the first


floor only at Elements located at 161 Mamaroneck Avenue.


4. Public Hearing in relation to the application submitted on behalf of the White


Plains Housing Authority for a Special Permit to allow the proposed new ten (10)


story residential project to be known as Winbrook Redevelopment – Phase I,


located at the intersection of South Lexington Avenue and Quarropas Street,


situated in the B-3 Zoning District, to be constructed to a height of approximately


one hundred and six (106) feet under Section 5.3, Footnote (X) of the Zoning


Ordinance of the City of White Plains.


5. Communications from City Clerk


6. Commissioner of Building


7. Design Review Board (2)


8. Commissioner of Planning


9. Planning Board


10. Commissioner of Public Safety


11. Commissioner of Public Works


12. Commissioner of Traffic


13. Traffic Commission


14. Commissioner of Parking (2)


15. Conservation Board


16. Westchester County Planning Board


17. Environmental Officer


18. Environmental Findings Resolution


19. Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains approving


the application submitted on behalf of the White Plains Housing Authority


(“Applicant”) for a project known as Winbrook Redevelopment – Phase I,


consisting of site plan approval under Section 7 of the Zoning Ordinance


of the City of White Plains (“Zoning Ordinance”) to construct a new ten


(10) story multi-family residential building consisting of 103 rental


affordable dwelling units on floors two through ten and a community


education facility to be operated by the White Plains Youth Bureau on the


first floor thereof, situated in the B-3 Zoning District on a 1.2 acre parcel,


at the intersection of South Lexington Avenue and Quarropas Street at


223-225 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, and a Special Permit


under Section 5.3, Footnote (X) of the Zoning Ordinance to permit the


facility to be constructed to a height of one hundred and six (106) feet.


PUB LIC HEARINGS:


20. Public Hearing in relation to an application submitted on behalf of the applicant


359-369 Mamaroneck Avenue LLC d/b/a Esposito’s Ristorante & Pizzeria II for a


Special Permit for Outdoor Rooftop Dining at Esposito’s Restaurant located at


359 Mamaroneck Avenue.


21. Communications from City Clerk


22. Commissioner of Building


23. Design Review Board (2)


24. Commissioner of Planning


25. Planning Board


26. Commissioner of Public Safety


27. Commissioner of Public Works


28. Commissioner of Traffic


29. Traffic Commission


30. Commissioner of Parking (2)


31. Westchester County Planning Board


32. Environmental Officer


33. Environmental Findings Resolution


34. Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains granting the


application made on behalf of 359 – 369 Mamaroneck Ave. LLC, owner,


for tenant, known as Esposito’s Restaurant and Pizzeria II, Inc.


(“Applicant”), located at 359 – 369 Mamaroneck Avenue for a Special


Permit to allow rooftop outdoor dining subject to the conditions contained


herein.


35. Public Hearing in relation to the application submitted on behalf of Noodles Plus


Restaurant for a Special Permit for Outdoor Dining for the 2012 Summer/Fall


Season on private property in the courtyard area of 235-245 Main Street.


36. Communications from Commissioner of Building


37. Design Review Board


38. Commissioner of Planning


39. Planning Board


40. Commissioner of Public Safety


41. Commissioner of Public Works


42. Commissioner of Traffic


43. Traffic Commission


44. Commissioner of Parking


45. Westchester County Planning Board


46. Environmental Officer


47. Environmental Findings Resolution


48. Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains granting the


application made on behalf of Noodle Plus Restaurant (“Applicant”)


located at 235-245 Main Street for a Special Permit to allot Outdoor


Dining in the courtyard located at 235-245 Main Street in the Central


Parking Area subject to the conditions contained herein.


49. Public Hearings in relation to (1) in accordance with General City Law Section


280A, in relation to a revised proposed amendment to the 1997 Comprehensive


Plan as amended by Resolution adopted July 11, 2006 (“2005 Plan Update”)


with respect to the Campus Office (C-O) Zoning District; and (2) in relation to a


revised proposed ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance of the City of White


Plains (“Zoning Ordinance”) with respect to the C-O Zoning District, to provide


additional “uses” permitted in the C-O Zoning District, to established a new “Use”


“Planned Campus Development” and a new “Planned Office Development


District,” make certain revisions to the Dimensional Standards for “Uses” in the


C-O Zoning District and establish certain Dimensional Standards and “Uses” for


the “Planned Campus Development” District.


50. Communication from Commissioner of Planning


51. Planning Board


52. Conservation Board


53. Environmental Officer


54. Environmental Findings Resolution


55. Ordinance amending an ordinance entitled, “The Zoning Ordinance of the


City of White Plains” with respect to amendments to provide additional


“Uses” permitted in the Campus Office District, establish a new “Use”


“Planned Campus Development” and a new overlay district the “Planned


Campus Development” District, make certain revisions to the Dimensional


Standards for “Uses” in the Campus Office District and establish certain


Dimensional Standards and “Uses” for the “Planned Campus


Development” District.


FIRST READING


ORDINANCES:


56. Communication from Corporation Counsel in relation to the settlement of certain


tax review proceedings.


57. Ordinance authorizing the settlement of certain tax review proceedings.


58. Communication from Corporation Counsel in relation to the correction of a


previously adopted ordinance regarding a tax review proceeding.


59. Ordinance amending an ordinance entitled, “An ordinance authorizing the


settlement of certain tax review proceedings.”


60. Communication from Corporation Counsel in relation to funds for attorneys’ fees


and litigation expenses pursuant to Section 2-5-8 of the White Plains Municipal


Code.


61. Ordinance authorizing the payment attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses


pursuant to Section 2-5-8 of the White Plains Municipal Code.


62. Communication from Chairman, Capital Projects Board, in relation to Capital


Projects No. C5380, Rolling Stock Acquisition Light Duty Vehicles 2012-2013,


C5386, Rolling Stock Acquisition Heavy Duty Vehicles 2012-2013, W5386, and


Rolling Stock Acquisition Water Fund 2012-2013.


63. Ordinance of the Common Council of the City of White Plains to amend


the Capital Projects Fund by amending Capital Project No. C5380, entitled


Rolling Stock Acquisition, Light Duty Vehicles 2012-2013, and establishing


Capital Project No. C5385, Rolling Stock Acquisition Heavy Duty Vehicles


2012-2013, and Capital Project No. W5386, Rolling Stock Acquisition


Water Fund 2012-2013.


64. Bond Ordinance dated August 6, 2012, authorizing the issuance of


$760,000 aggregate principal amount serial bonds of the City of White


Plains, County of Westchester, State of New York, to finance the costs of


the acquisition of machinery and apparatus for construction and


maintenance.


65. Communication from Chairman, Capital Projects Boards, in relation to Capital


Project No. W5387, Purchase of 200 Westchester Avenue


66. Communication from Environmental Officer


67. Environmental Findings Resolution


68. Ordinance of the Common Council of the City of White Plains to amend


the Capital Projects Fund by establishing Capital Project No. W5387


entitled, 200 Westchester Avenue Acquisition.


69. Bond Ordinance dated August 6, 2012, authorizing the issuance of


$500,000 aggregate principal amount serial bonds of the City of White


Plains, County of Westchester, State of New York, to finance the costs of


the acquisition and reconstruction of Class A Buildings for municipal use.


70. Communication from Commissioner of Public Works in relation to a license


agreement between the City and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority


(Metro North), to construct, install, operate and maintain a duct bank within the


City of White Plains.


71. Communication from Environmental Officer


72. Ordinance granting a license agreement to the Metropolitan


Transportation Authority acting for itself and on behalf of Metro North


Commuter Railroad Company to construct, install, operate and maintain a


duct bank within the City of White Plains.


73. Communication from Commissioner of Public Works in relation to a grant in the


amount of $12,635 by the County of Westchester, to fund remediation and


restoration to the White Plains Mamaroneck River Basin and the White Plains


Greenway, as a result of damage from storms.


74. Ordinance of the Common Council of the City of White Plains authorizing


the Mayor, or his designee, to accept, on behalf of the City of White


Plains, a grant from the County of Westchester to fund remediation and


restoration to the White Plains Mamaroneck River Basin and the White


Plains Greenway and to amend the FY 2012-2013 General Fund Budget


for the Department of Public Works to reflect this Grant.


75. Communication from Director, Youth Bureau, in relation to a contract with the


Westchester-Putnam Workforce Investment Board (WPWIB) to provide Summer


Employment Services to Youth 18 – 24 years of age.


76. Ordinance authorizing the Mayor, or his designee, to enter into a contract


with the Westchester-Putnam Workforce Investment Board (WPWIB) to


provide private sector Summer Employment Services (through the City of


White Plains Youth Bureau) to youth 18 to 24 years of age for the period


January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012.


77. Communication from Director, Youth Bureau, in relation to a contract with the


N.Y.S. Department of Education to continue the 21st Century Community


Learning Centers – Kids Excel Program.


78. Ordinance authorizing the Mayor, or his designee, to enter into a contract


with the State Education Department to continue its services to the Youth


Bureau’s 21st Century Community Learning Centers – Kids Excel Program.


79. Communication from the Mayor in relation to a transfer from Reserve for


Financing to cover the cost of consulting services.


80. Ordinance authorizing the Mayor to direct the Budget Director to transfer


funds from the FY 2012-2013 Reserve for Financing in order to provide


additional funding to cover costs associated with the transition of


commissioners within the Planning Department.


81. Communication from Personnel Director in relation to proposed amendment to


Section 2-5-81 of the Municipal Code to reallocate a certain position title.


82. Ordinance amending Section 2-5-81 of the White Plains Municipal Code


by reallocating a certain position title.


83. Communication from Commissioner of Parking in relation to a lease agreement


with the White Plains School District for the use and maintenance of the Main-


Kensico Municipal Parking Lot (#44) on the grounds of the Eastview Middle


School.


84. Ordinance of the Common Council of the City of White Plains authorizing


the Mayor to enter into a license agreement with the City School District of


the City of White Plains to permit the City to use Eastview School Parking


Lot at the corner of Main Street and Kensico Avenue for Neighborhood


Parking.


RESOLUTIONS:


85. Communication from Corporation Counsel in relation to the scheduling of a


public hearing on an application for a Special Permit and Site Plan Approval for a


31 – 33 bed Medically-Supervised Inpatient Detoxification Service Community


Residence to be known as Sunrise White Plains, and located at 37 DeKalb


Avenue, (formerly the Nathan Miller Nursing Home).


86. Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains scheduling


a public hearing for September 4, 2012, in relation to the application


submitted on behalf of CFI, Inc., and Sunrise White Plains (“Applicant”) for


a Special Permit and Site Plan Approval of a “Community Residence” at


37 DeKalb Avenue, to operate a short term medically supervised


detoxification treatment facility with up to thirty three (33) inpatient beds.


87. Communication from Corporation Counsel in relation to an application submitted


by Butterfield 8 WP LLC, for a Special Permit for Cabaret Use at Butterfield 8,


147 Mamaroneck Avenue.


88. Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains scheduling


a public hearing for September 4, 2012 in relation to the application


submitted by Butterfield 8 WP LLC, on behalf of Butterfield 8 Restaurant


and Lounge for a one (1) year Special Permit to operate a Cabaret at


applicant’s establishment located at 147 Mamaroneck Avenue.


89. Communication from Corporation Counsel in relation to an application submitted


by Butterfield 8 WP LLC, for a Special Permit for Cabaret Use at Lola’s Mexican


Kitchen, 47 Mamaroneck Avenue.


90. Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains scheduling


a public hearing for September 4, 2012 in relation to the application


submitted by Butterfield 8 WP LLC, on behalf of Lola’s Mexican Kitchen


for a one (1) year Special Permit to operate a Cabaret at applicant’s


establishment located at 147 Mamaroneck Avenue.


91. Communication from Corporation Counsel in relation to the scheduling of a


public hearing for September 4, 2012 on to an application submitted on behalf of


Gaucho Grille, for a Special Permit for Outdoor Dining at One North Broadway.


92. Communication from Commissioner of Building


93. Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains scheduling


a public hearing for September 4, 2012 in relation to the application


submitted on behalf of Gaucho Grille for a Special Permit for Outdoor


Dining for the 2012 Summer/Fall Season on private property located at


the front of One North Broadway, adjacent to the Restaurant entrance.


94. Communication from Planning In relation to the scheduling of a public hearing


for September 4, 2012 on proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to


establish a new Open Space Recreational District, and on the 1997


Comprehensive Plan in relation to land use, and environmental regulations, and


modifications to the Zoning Map and accepting the Draft Generic Environmental


Impact Statement as complete.



95. Communication from Environmental Officer


96. Environmental Findings Resolution accepting the Draft Generic


Environmental Impact Statement regarding amendments to the City’s


Comprehensive Plan, as amended and updated; and amendment to the


Zoning Ordinance establishing a new Open Space Recreation District;


and as necessary, amendments to the related land use, and


environmental regulations; and making certain modifications to the Zoning


Map.


97. Communication from Commissioner of Planning in relation to: Acceptance as


complete of the preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement submitted on


behalf of the French American School of New York; filing and publishing of a


Notice of Completion of the Final FASNY DEIS; filing and distribution of the


complete final FASNY DEIS; establishing a public comment period including


public hearings to hear public comments on the final FASNY – DEIS.


98. Communication from Environmental Officer


99. Lead Agency Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White


Plains as Lead Agency under the New York State Environmental Quality


Review Act, (SEQR), regarding the application submitted by the French


American School of New York (FASNY), for a Special Permit to develop a


private elementary and secondary school with accessory nursery school


or day care center at 400 Ridgeway, White Plains, accepting the Draft


Environmental Impact Statement (FASNY DEIS) as adequate with respect


to its scope and content for the purpose of commencing public review,


and scheduling a public hearing and taking such actions as are required


by SEQR.


100. Communication from Commissioner of Planning in relation to the application of


LCOR 55 Bank Street LLC, for a site plan extension in relation to proposed


mixed use development at 55 Bank Street.


101. Communication from Environmental Officer.


102. Environmental Findings Resolution


103. Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains amending


the expiration date of a resolution adopted November 2, 2009, granting


the application submitted on behalf of LCOR 55 Bank Street LLC


(“Applicant”) for site plan approval, which included a one (1) year


extension and an amendment of its existing initial site plan approval


originally adopted by the Common Council on February 4, 2008, on


premises located on the westerly side of Bank Street, southerly of Main


Street, and easterly of the Metro North Railroad, in accordance with the


Zoning Ordinance of the City of White Plains and the contract for sale of


land among the White Plains Urban Renewal Agency, the City of White


Plains and LCOR, for private redevelopment of the property known as 55


Bank Street (“LDA”).


104. Communication from Commissioner of Planning transmitting the 2012-2013


Community Development Program Annual Action Plan.


105. Communication from Environmental Officer


106. Resolution of the Common Council of the City of White Plains, New York,


approving the Federally Mandated 2012-13 Annual Action Plan for the


City of White Plains and authorizing the Mayor to execute all necessary


certifications and assurances and file the Approved Plan with the U.S.


Department of Housing and Urban Development.


ITEM FOR REFERRAL:


107. Communication from the City Clerk in relation to a site plan application for


signage submitted on behalf of the Bristal Assisted Living Facility (North Street


Community), and the Engel Burman Group, to be located at 305 North Street,


(formerly St. Agnes Hospital)


108. Communication from Commissioner of Planning in relation to a proposed


amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of White Plains with respect to


the addition of definitions and new regulations as Section 4.4.21, regarding solar


energy systems.

Posted in Uncategorized

Final Environmental Impact Statement on Construction of NewTappan Zee Bridge Ava

Hits: 0

WPCNR TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE NEWS. From the New York State Thruway Authority. August 1, 2012:


The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) along with the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and the New York State Thruway Authority (NYSTA) have prepared a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) to examine the potential environmental effects of proposed alternatives for the Tappan Zee Hudson River Crossing Project, and where adverse impacts are identified, it discusses measures to mitigate them.


Copies of the FEIS are available online at www.newnybridge.com (formerly www.thenewtzb.com) and for review and copying during business hours at the repositories listed here.


This document is available for public review until September 4, 2012 after which time a Record of Decision will be issued. Questions or comments regarding this FEIS should be sent to:


Michael Anderson
New York State Department of Transportation
4 Burnett Boulevard
Poughkeepsie, New York 12603
or email
tzbsite@dot.state.ny.us


The Record of Decision will address any new or substantive comments made during the public review period.

Posted in Uncategorized

BOE Ponders $48M Bond; Teacher Contract to Friendly Arbitration

Hits: 0

 


 


WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. August 1,2012 UPDATED 11:23 P.M. E.D.T.:


 


A decision on to bond for $34 Million or $48 Million in school building maintenance in 2013 and a Teachers Contract Settlement appear likely this month.


 


The White Plains  Board of Education met Monday evening to discuss recommendations  of the District Finance Committee on extensive maintenance projects for six schools in the district.


 


Supertintendent of Schools Dr. Christopher Clouet told WPCNR after the public session of the meeting that no decision to schedule a bond referendum this fall had been reached. He said the Board would tour Eastview School within the next two weeks to consider the roof repairs and building exterior work suggested, a total of $8.4 Million. 


 


The Superintendent expressed optimism that a settlement on a new contract with the teachers would happen before the start of the school year. Kerry Broderick, President of the Teachers union told WPCNR Wednesday evening, “We are negotiating language changes as well as salary and benefits. All of these are difficult and since they are negotiated as a package, they are all tightly linked. Sorry, I can’t be more specific than that at this time.”


 


Tuesday afternoon Ms. Broderick confirmed that the negotiating atmosphere had changed


 


“We are still at impasse and mediation is scheduled for August 16th. These negotiations are not contentious, so we continued to try to resolve our differences during the summer. However, both sides agree that a neutral third party will help us. I am optimistic we will settle.


 


Consensus of the Board  despite much handringing over the 1% property tax increase it would mean during discussion Monday night leaned toward doing the work for all the elementary schools, high school and middle schools . 


 


To execute both Plans ($30 Million for priority maintenance for the elementaries, high school and middle schools and  roughly $15 Million for the second plan including wiring for WI-FI wireless capability in all district buildings at a cost of $5.8 Million) beginning next summer  would require a referendum to finance $48 Million in new school debt in October.


 


The Board has decided to tour Eastview School and decide based on their tour whether to vote to fund $34 Million or $48 Million on August 13, Clouet indicated, amounts subject to vary depending on what the Board finds.


 


Members of the board were told by the Buildings and Grounds Supertindent that financing is at an historic low in interest rates and the maintenance done now would be most advantageous for the district.


 


Teacher Negotiations Expected to Settle by Start of School


 


The Board of Education then  went into a Executive Session to discuss teacher contract negotiations which have been at an impasse according to Kerry Broderick, President of the White Plains Teachers Association.


 


Superintendent of Schools Clouet left the Executive Session at 10 P.M., and WPCNR asked him about the teacher negotiations status and how teachers pay is being affected now that they are without a contract.


 


Clouet said the teachers who are not at the ceiling of pay would receive their usual step pay   increase for their additional year of longevity. However, Clouet said teachers currently at ceiling pay levels already would not receive a step increase, of which “there are a lot,” Clouet said.


 


Asked if the negotiations were still at an impasse, Clouet said the atmosphere had thawed and the district and teachers were talking and that he hoped for a settlement before the start of the school year.


 


Kerry Broderick, Teachers Union President, confirmed this to WPCNR in a e-mailed statement Tuesday afternoon.


 


“We are still at impasse and mediation is scheduled for August 16th.  These negotiations are not contentious, so we continued to try to resolve our differences during the summer.  However, both sides agree that a neutral third party will help us.  I am optimistic we will settle.

Posted in Uncategorized

WINS: ASTORINO SAYS PLAYLAND LOSING $3 TO 5 MILLION IS NO LONGER AN OPTION

Hits: 0


WPCNR WESTCHESTER COUNTY-CLARION LEDGER. JULY 31, 2012 UPDATED 11:17 P.M. E.D.T.:


CBS Radio’s Paul Murnane on WINS this evening reported Westchester County Executive Robert P. Astorino saying, “Cash strapped Westchester losing $3 to 5 Million a year on Rye Playland is no longer going to be an option,” and that trend in losses is likely to continue. A decison on the park future will be made in September.


Director of Communications for Westchester County, Ned McCormick, told WPCNR this evening, “He never said Playland is closing. The losses at Playland are nothing new. “



The Midway at Playland


The report comes within days after the County Board of Legislators received reports that Playland attendance this summer is down 5.6% and revenues 10.6%. However this attendance decline has developed over the three years of a $35 Admission policy per person to enter the park on top of a $7 Parking fee, considerably raising the cost of entering the park.


The county is currently considering a series of proposals for revamping the park. The leading contender and apparently the most organized is a group calling itself Sustainable Playland, which plans on creating a sculpture garden at the entrance, adding an indoor/outdoor sport facility, an outdoor field, and a walking park on the shore, while retaining the ice casino and a number of the landmark rides.


A lease, yet to be approved by the county Board of Acquisitons and Contracts, is also under consideration to be granted a Children’s Museum group that would spend $14 Million to house its museum in the North Basthouse. That depends, according to County Communications Director Ned McCormick, speaking to WPCNR last Friday, on the museum group showing the county they have the money to execute the museum within two years.


McCormick told WPCNR Monday that selling Playland (should none of the three proposals for Playland be deemed acceptable to the County) would require any buyer to pay market value for the 100 acres and replace the 100 acres with other land, because Playland is considered “parkland.” McCormick said this requirement on the part of any entity buying Playland was unlikely to be met.

Posted in Uncategorized

FBI ANNOUNCES $731 MILLION SETTLEMENT WITH POKER STARS AND FULL TILT POKER

Hits: 0

WPCNR FBI WIRE. Special to WPCNR from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. July 31, 2012:


Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that the United States has entered into settlement agreements with PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker—two of three online poker companies sued by the U.S. in a money laundering and forfeiture complaint that was originally filed in April 2012—that were approved today by U.S. District Judge Leonard B. Sand.


Under the terms of the settlement with Full Tilt Poker (“Full Tilt”), the company agreed to forfeit virtually all of its assets to the U.S. to fully resolve the charges in the complaint.


Under the terms of the settlement with PokerStars, the company agreed to forfeit $547 million to the U.S. and to reimburse the approximately $184 million owed by Full Tilt to foreign players in order to fully resolve the allegations in the complaint. The settlement further provides that PokerStars will acquire the forfeited Full Tilt assets from the government. Full Tilt’s U.S. fraud victims will be able to seek compensation for their losses from the Department of Justice from the $547 million forfeited by PokerStars.


Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said,


“We are pleased to announce these settlements by Full Tilt Poker and PokerStars, which allow us to quickly get significant compensation into the victim players’ hands. Today’s settlements demonstrate that if you engage in conduct that violates the laws of the United States, as we alleged in this case, then even if you are doing so from across the ocean, you will have to answer for that conduct and turn over your ill-gotten gains.”


“Today’s forfeiture is another important step in the FBI’s investigation, allowing for serious compensation of victims. This should serve as a deterrent to others who look to actively circumvent United States law—onshore or offshore, you will be held responsible for those actions. Pokerstars and Full Tilt bet the house on their illicit scheme; fortunately, we were holding the trump card,” said FBI Assistant Director Janice K. Fedarcyk.


Under the terms of the settlement with Full Tilt, U.S. victims of the company’s alleged fraud will be able to seek compensation from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The funds that will be used to compensate qualifying victims will come from the $547 million that will be forfeited by PokerStars as part of its settlement with the government.


In addition to forfeiting $547 million to the U.S., under the terms of the settlement with PokerStars, the company must make available to foreign players all balances that were held in the Full Tilt accounts within 90 days; the amount of those balances is approximately $184 million.


Pokerstars will also acquire the forfeited Full Tilt assets from the government. PokerStars’ acquisition of the forfeited Full Tilt assets will be complete upon the government’s receipt of a $225 million payment from PokerStars, which must take place within six days of the entrance of today’s settlement.


Additional terms of the PokerStars settlement include:



  • Within 45 days of the acquisition of the forfeited Full Tilt assets, Isai Scheinberg, who is presently under indictment in a related criminal case, shall not serve in any management or director role at PokerStars. This provision is subject to re-evaluation by the parties upon the resolution of the criminal case.
  • PokerStars is also prohibited from employing, or otherwise hiring, Full Tilt Poker insiders Raymond Bitar, Howard Lederer, Rafael Furst, Chris Ferguson, and Nelson Burtnick. Bitar and Burtnick are also named as defendants in a related criminal Indictment. Bitar, Lederer, Furst, and Ferguson are named as civil money-laundering defendants in this complaint.
  • PokerStars is prohibited from offering online poker in the U.S. for real money unless and until it is legal to do so under U.S. law.
  • The government will maintain a portion of the $547 million forfeited by PokerStars as a substitute for the forfeited Full Tilt assets to cover the litigation of claims by other parties asserting interests in the forfeited Full Tilt assets.

The settlements entered today with regard to Full Tilt Poker and PokerStars, and the proposed settlement with regard to Absolute Poker, do not constitute admissions of any wrongdoing, culpability, liability, or guilt by any parties. Under the terms of a “domain name use” agreement entered into between PokerStars and the government on April 20, 2011, the company previously settled its accounts with U.S. players.


In a related matter, the U.S. Attorney’s Office also filed a motion requesting that the court enter a settlement agreement reached with Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet that requires the company to forfeit all of its assets in order to fully resolve this action.


The motion also requests that the government be permitted to liquidate the Absolute assets, with the net proceeds of that sale to be held pending the resolution of claims filed by other parties who have asserted an ownership interest in the Absolute assets.


The following allegations are based on the Amended Civil Forfeiture Complaint filed in September and the indictments returned in the related criminal action:


On October 13, 2006, the United States enacted the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA), making it a federal crime for gambling businesses to “knowingly accept” most forms of payment “in connection with the participation of another person in unlawful Internet gambling.”


Despite the passage of the UIGEA, Full Tilt Poker, PokerStars, and Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet (the poker companies), each located offshore, continued operating in the United States.


Because U.S. banks and credit card issuers were largely unwilling to process their payments, the poker companies allegedly used fraudulent methods to circumvent federal law and deceive these financial institutions into processing payments on their behalf.


 For example, the poker companies arranged for the money received from U.S. gamblers to be disguised as payments to hundreds of non-existent online merchants purporting to sell merchandise such as jewelry and golf balls. Of the billions of dollars in payment transactions that the poker companies deceived U.S. banks into processing, approximately one-third or more of the funds went directly to the poker companies as revenue through the “rake” charged to players on almost every poker hand played online.


To accomplish their fraud, the poker companies worked with an array of highly compensated “payment processors” who obtained accounts at U.S. banks for the poker companies.


The payment processors lied to banks about the nature of the financial transactions they were processing and covered up those lies, by, among other things, creating phony corporations and websites to disguise payments to the poker companies.


For example, a PokerStars document from May 2009 acknowledged that they received money from U.S. gamblers through company names that “strongly imply the transaction has nothing to do with PokerStars” and that PokerStars used whatever company names “the processor can get approved by the bank.”


Full Tilt Poker further defrauded players by misrepresenting that player funds on deposit in online gambling accounts were safe, secure, and available for withdrawal at any time.


In reality, the company did not maintain funds sufficient to repay all players and, instead, utilized players’ funds to distribute more than $400 million to Full Tilt’s owners.


By March 31, 2011, two weeks before the initial complaint in this action was unsealed, Full Tilt Poker owed approximately $390 million to players around the world, including approximately $160 million to players in the United States.


At that time, Full Tilt Poker had only approximately $60 million on deposit in its bank accounts.


Full Tilt Poker’s scheme continued even after the civil forfeiture action commenced and the related criminal indictment was unsealed in April 2011. Full Tilt Poker continued accepting foreign player funds despite the fact that it had liabilities to players around the world for over $300 million yet held only a small fraction of that amount in its bank accounts.


Eleven defendants were charged criminally in connection with the original Internet poker indictment, seven of whom have been arrested.


The defendants who have been arrested are: Raymond Bitar, Bradley Franzen, Ryan Lang, Ira Rubin, Brent Beckley, Chad Elie, and John Campos.


All seven defendants except Bitar have each pled guilty and await sentencing with the exception of Campos, who was sentenced in June 2012 to three months in prison. Charges are still pending against the remaining four defendants—Nelson Burtnick, Isai Scheinberg, Paul Tate, and Scott Tom—who remain at large. The charges and accusations against them are allegations, and they are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.


U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara praised the FBI for its outstanding leadership in the investigation, which he noted is ongoing.


This matter is being handled by the Office’s Asset Forfeiture and Complex Frauds Unit. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Sharon Cohen Levin, Michael Lockard, Jason Cowley, and Andrew Goldstein are in charge of the civil money laundering and forfeiture action. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Arlo Devlin-Brown, Nicole Friedlander and Niketh Velamoor are in charge of the criminal case.

Posted in Uncategorized