$100,000,000 Election Rigging Suit Filed Against County Executive and 119 Others in Federal Court

Hits: 304

 

WPCNR WHITE PLAINS LAW JOURNAL. From The Westchester County Independence Party and material from WPCNR. October 31, 2013:

Four days before the Westchester County Elections, a Federal lawsuit was filed Thursday by The Westchester County Independence Party in U.S. District Court, Southern District, against County Executive Robert P. Astorino and 119 others  by the Westchester County Independence Party which alleges according to a 58-page brief filed Thursday,

“…each and every Co-Conspirator Defendant was directly linked in some capacity (i.e.,employees, relatives, friends or high-ranking employees in the administration of County Executive Robert P. Astorino), to the County Executive and numerous Defendants enrolled in the Independence Party, typically at the proverbial midnight hour for the sole purpose of assisting the Candidate for County Executive, Co-Conspirator Defendant Robert P. Astorino in his plan to “raid” and take over the Independence Party and rig the outcome of its Primary Election.”

Details of the suit, not filed until Thursday, were discussed in a recent Westchester Guardian. A news conference on the suit is scheduled for noon on Friday in front of the Charles Brient Federal Courthouse in White Plains.

The Co-Conspirator Defendants are a “Who’s Who” of the Westchester County government.

The 123 defendants have 21 Days to respond.

The suit asks $1,000,000 in actual damages from the Co-Conspirator Defendents and $100,000,000 against the Co-Conspirator Defendants  for violations of RICO plus all reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs from the prosecution.

Barry Caro, a spokesman for the Bramson Campaign said at 12:30 A.M., Mr. Astorino’s opponent in the County Executive election next Tuesday, said the campaign had not read the lawsuit and could not comment on it at this time.

Asked if Noam Bramson was going to attend the news conference Friday, Barry Caro told WPCNR in a written statement:

“It’s not our event in any way, so no. Our campaign has literally nothing to do with this lawsuit, and any suggestion otherwise is yet another desperate attempt by Mr. O’Reilly to distract from his campaign’s utter lack of positive ideas.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Governor ANNOUNCES TIFIA LOAN APPROVAL FOR NEW TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE: $1.58 BILLION.

Hits: 326

WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. From the Westchester County Department of Communications with information from WPCNR. October 31, 2013:

Governor Andrew Cuomo announced the award of a $1.58 billion  TIFIA  loan to the Thruway Authority for partial funding of the new Tappan Zee Bridge  at about 2 P.M. this afternoon:

“Approval of New York State’s request for this loan is great news for the tens of thousands of commuters who depend on the Tappan Zee every day, for communities in the Lower Hudson Valley, and for our entire state,” Governor Cuomo said. “This is a huge win for New York State, creating thousands of jobs, and an endorsement of one of the most ambitious infrastructure projects in our history. It shows that despite over a decade of delay, New York can continue to build big. I thank Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx for his hard work helping New York secure this loan.”

The following is a statement from Westchester County Executive Robert P. Astorino regarding the federal government’s approval of a $1.58 billion loan to help finance construction of the new Tappan Zee Bridge:

“I congratulate Governor Cuomo on this good news. The next step is how do we finance the rest of the bridge and the mass transit improvements to and from the bridge, while keeping tolls as low as possible. The governor has my full support to help the state come up with the best financing plans possible.”

The approval comes three days after Standard & Poor’s downgraded New York State Thruway Authority credit rating from A+ to A.

The S&P News Release on the downgrade said: “The downgrade reflects our view of the NYSTA’s (New York State Thruway Authority) significant increase in leverage and reliance  on frequent rate increases to maintain margins.

Joseph Pezzimenti, S&P Credit Analyst said: “Although we have a general idea of how much tolls will be increased to fund the replacement of the Tappan Zee Bridge and ongoing capital needs for the rest of the (thruway) system, the combination of the lack of a specific tolling plan and the potential for lower traffic levels at a time when the NYSTA will incread its leverage significantly led to the the downgrade.”

The lowering of the rating is expected to add millions to the cost of the thruway borrowing the  balance  of $2.7 BILLION more  to build the $4.2 Billion bridge, including loan costs.

The Federal Highway Agency took approximately one year to approve the loan during which time the TIFIA interest rate for a 35-year loan went from 3.1% a year to 3.62% as of today.“Approval of New York State’s request for this loan is great news for the tens of thousands of commuters who depend on the Tappan Zee every day, for communities in the Lower Hudson Valley, and for our entire state,” Governor Cuomo said. “This is a huge win for New York State, creating thousands of jobs, and an endorsement of one of the most ambitious infrastructure projects in our history. It shows that despite over a decade of delay, New York can continue to build big. I thank Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx for his hard work helping New York secure this loan.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Local Lady Makes Good: Cynthia Rubino Named Head of YMCA of Northern/Central Westchester

Hits: 558

Rubinoheadshot

Cynthia Rubino of Yorktown, and a native of White Plains, daughter of former Mayor of White Plains, Joseph Delfino, was tapped by the YMCA of Northern and Central Westchester

WPCNR PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE. OCTOBER 30, 2013:

The YMCA of Central and Northern Westchester has been serving the community for more than 100 years, has appointed Cynthia Rubino as CEO.  She will begin in January of 2014.

Ms. Rubino is well-known in White Plains as  the daughter of former White Plains Mayor Joseph Delfino

Rubino, who was previously COO and Vice President for Government Relations for Berkeley College, will guide the YMCA’s funding and operations to include its branches in White Plains, Somers, Mt. Vernon and Camp Combe in Putnam Valley, NY.

“I am grateful for this opportunity to lead the incredible team of professionals, board members and other volunteers at the YMCA of Central and Northern Westchester,” Rubino said. “The mission of the Y is Youth Development, Healthy Living and Social Responsibility, 3 very important goals for a strong Westchester County.”

“We are thrilled with the appointment of Cynthia Rubino as CEO,” said YMCA of Central and Northern Westchester Chairman of the Board of Governors Ralph Penny. “She is a results-oriented civic-minded leader with a talent for team-building and gaining community loyalty. She is just the person needed to lead the YMCA forward as we plan for a strong presence in Westchester to fulfill our mission.”

The YMCA CNW is a multi-faceted operation that is one of the largest providers of childcare services in the county with more than 500 children a day in afterschool programs serving seven school districts.  The Y branches provide day care, fitness & pool facilities, housing, summer camps, and fitness classes. Camp Combe located on 80 rustic acres in the town of Putnam Valley services over 550 children and teens each day during the summer months.

“My many years of service to local governments and the college community have prepared me to lead an organization that focuses on service to the Westchester families and youth,” Rubino said.  “What better way to help create a stronger Westchester than to focus on Youth Development, Healthy Living and Social Responsibility

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Bramson’s Hometown Radio Station Endorses Astorino

Hits: 363

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2013.News Comment .October 30, 2013:

WPCNR usually does not report endorsements in political campaigns, but when a candidate’s hometown media radio station that has had the opportunity to view Mr. Bramson’s performance as councilmember and Mayor first hand in New Rochelle for 16 years, declines to endorse Noam Bramson, that’s news. If anything, a hometown radio station would be the first to endorse him. Here is that editorial broadcast by station owner William O-Shaughnessy Tuesday.

William O’Shaughnessy, the President and Editorial Director of WVOX Radio (where WPCNR does an unpaid commentary once a week on Tuesdays, 7:35 A.M.) broadcast the following editorial Tuesday:

Astorino for County Executive

A Whitney Media Editorial of the Air

by William O’Shaughnessy

broadcast October 29, 2013

2013william o'shaughnessy 003

Despite what you’ve heard … we are endorsing Noam Bramson … for
Congress!

We’re sorry. But Noam Bramson has been running a “Congressional
Campaign” from the get go. Young Mr. Bramson, I tell you, has all
the Kennedy-esque moves. All the gestures. The pace. The cadence.
The rhythm. All the Harvard elocution. He’s got the moves.

But. But downtown New Rochelle, with rare exception (a few good
restaurants, an art gallery, a couple of jewelry stores) is essentially
all “dollar” stores and a for-profit college owned by out-of-towners.
For you see Mayor Bramson has practically turned over most of our
faded and beleaguered downtown to Monroe College and the Jerome
family’s for-profit empire. And he’s trying to jam that ill-conceived
Echo Bay so-called “development” down everyone’s throat. But the
concerned, sensible residents of his city are asking what the hell
Forest City Ratner has ever done for New Rochelle! We can answer
that: absolutely nothing!

We’ve been at the People’s Business for 50 years, ladies and
gentlemen … covering politics and government here in Westchester
… and we’ve had Mayor Bramson at this microphone often during his
tenure as our part-time mayor. He’s articulate. He talks a very good
game of policy-speak. But he’s gone missing during his recent
bewildering “Congressional Campaign.”

Noam Bramson is precocious. He’s brilliant. And he lets everyone
know it. He’s a policy wonk very much at ease with the jargon of
governance and lingo of text book public policy .

But the Westchester county executive is supposed to run the damn
county parks, the county parkways, the county police. And preside
over the 1.7 billion dollar county budget. Mr. Astorino does that all
with great skill and sound judgment.

Our friends at the Journal News have blessed Mr. Bramson’s lofty
aspirations … saying he offers a “holistic” approach. With all due
respect, I’m not sure what the hell that means (we’re sure our friend
Phil Reisman, their star feature columnist, didn’t write that Holy
Holistic headline!) Have it as you will, we believe Rob Astorino offers
a sensible, prudent, common sense approach to regional, local
government.

Mr. Bramson has shoveled hundreds of thousands of dollars down to
Washington, DC consultants and political gurus in the state of
Virginia. But he has almost completely ignored local media – the
local newspapers, and indeed, our local radio stations. There’s no
question he’s shooting for the big time. He’s really … running … for
Congress. And it was ever thus.

Indeed, Mr. Bramson has even ignored the elders of his own Democratic Party in Westchester. No, like I said, I think our mayor is shooting for bigger fish. He wants to go National. We don’t think he’s at all interested in this job of Westchester County Executive.

We go all the way back in this county to Edwin Gilbert Michaelian, the
legendary county executive of sainted memory. The county office
building is named after Mr. Michaelian. He was a wonderful man.
And a great county executive. So too was Andy O’Rourke who we
lost just recently after a long, distinguished career in public service.
Rob Astorino is cut from the same bi-partisan, sensible cloth as
Michaelian and O’Rourke.

Astorino is also astute and smart enough to repair to the wise
counsel of some very intelligent individuals who know Westchester
well … such as his deputy Kevin Plunkett and Kevin’s estimable brother William Plunkett … as well as John Cahill, who, indeed, ran the State of New York at one time as chief of staff to a former governor … whereas Mr. Bramson seems to have wrapped himself in the bosom of those paid gun political strategists from Arlington, Virginia and Washington, D.C. who see big things for him. But the bottom line is: Noam Bramson is … not … a … good … fit … for this job.

We’re sorry but guns and abortion are national issues. And so is gay
marriage. And while we’re at it, it’s one thing to say you’re Pro
Choice. Everybody should be Pro Choice. A state can’t legislate
where it has no power, that is, in a woman’s body. But, in the very
next breath, we think you’ve got to say how horrible and vulgar and
violent abortion is. We haven’t heard that from Noam Bramson.

On his record, on the issues that should count in this race, Mr.
Astorino has been, in fact, a very brave and able executive. He’s
taken bold and, at the same time, prudent, sensible steps to curb the
excesses and sweep away the rubble of the Spano years. And he’s
done it all thoughtfully and carefully and fairly.

The battered and discredited national GOP in Washington can
certainly take a lesson from our enlightened Republican county
executive. He’s reached across the aisle and actually cooperated
with (God-forbid) Democrats.

Astorino has worked especially well with our Westchester neighbor
Governor Andrew Cuomo in whom we are so well pleased. And, in
case anyone failed to notice – the Governor, in what was supposed to
be a huge, momentous endorsement of Mayor Bramson last weekend
… opted instead to just do a perfunctory “shout-out” to Rockland and
Westchester Democratic candidates in general.

And say what you will about wily Bill Clinton. He’s not stupid. And
Bill Clinton’s so-called “endorsement” of Mr. Bramson was along the
same lines. (Anyway, we think he endorsed Mr. Bramson. It’s
“rumored” that he did anyway). But notice that no members of the
press were allowed to witness the grand event. Not one. In fact, the
media was summarily banned from the proceedings (something thatwas very pointedly noted by News 12’s great Janine Rose during the recent debate).

Now despite the outstanding job he’s been doing, Astorino has some
formidable obstacles. He’s got registration numbers against him.
Westchester, in case you haven’t noticed, is heavily Democratic. He’s
most likely got my beloved New York Times against him. He’s
certainly got our friends at “Mother Gannett” – the Journal News –
against him. And to his great credit, he’s got shy, modest retiring
Senator Chuck Schumer against him.

Rob Astorino has also had a lot of endorsements. But he’s going to have one more. We’re very pleased to announce this morning that WVOX and WVIP are endorsing Mr. Astorino, the very able and dedicated … Republican and Conservative candidate for County Executive of Westchester.

We’re glad to stand with Mr. Astorino.

This is a WVOX and WVIP Editorial of the Air. This is William
O’Shaughnessy.

 

Posted in Uncategorized

ASPCA Honored by White Plains Hudson Valley Pet Food Pantry

Hits: 373

20131029fprumpangtry 082
Left to right: Susan Katz, HVPFP; Claire Sterling, Senior Grants Manager, President’s Office, ASPCA; Jill Van Tuyl, Community Initiatives Director NY/NJ, Community Outreach, ASPCA., as guests look on (below)
20131029fprumpangtry 075
The ASPCA was honored by the Hudson Valley Pet Food Pantry for its support of the all-volunteer non-profit organization. Susan Katz, (left) founder and President of the HVPFP, presents a Certificate of Appreciation to representatives of the ASPCA at the Pantry’s fund raising event held Monday evening at Vintage in White Plains.
The Hudson Valley Pet Food Pantry serves 270 persons in the area, and feeds over 700 pets, whose owners can not afford to keep their pets without the pet food supplied by the Pantry. The organization was founded by Ms Katz of White Plains three years ago. Ms. Katz thanked the ASPCA for the advertising grant that got the Pantry started and introduced its service to Westchester County.
Be on the lookout for the next Pet Food Drive, you can either volunteer or purchase food for the Pantry.
Ms. Sterling of the ASPCA said the organization was proud to sponsor the Pantry which makes it possible for the 270 families and individuals to hang on to their pets during the difficult economy. Sterling said keeping their pets is a form of therapy and support as they work through changes in their lives.
Posted in Uncategorized

White Plains Special Needs PTA Announces Resource Fair

Hits: 436

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. From The WPSNPTA. October 28, 2013:

The White Plains Special Needs PTA will conduct a resource fair for the special needs community to bring together parents, educators and special needs service providers. A broad range of services for special needs families and their children will be on display, including therapists, recreational specialists, advocates, social groups, educators, doctors, and legal & financial planning advisors.

Details:
White Plains Special Needs Resource Fair
·         Saturday, November 16th from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
·         Post Road School, 175 W Post Road, White Plains, NY, 10606 ·         The event is open to all communities. There is no cost for children and families to attend.
“Special needs students and their parents often find that it is a struggle to get the support and help they need, both inside and outside of school,” said Caroline Furry, White Plains PTA Special Needs Committee. “As the special needs community continues to grow, it’s essential to bring together parents, educators and services providers to ensure students have an opportunity to get the support they need to succeed. The resource fair will give parents an opportunity to meet face to face with more than 40 specialists and get an understanding of the resources available to them and their children.” 
Contact the White Plains Special Needs PTA at wpspecial1@gmail.com.
Posted in Uncategorized

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Government Attempt to Take Over Education and Run It as a Business For Big Businesses Not for the Children

Hits: 333

October 24, 2013:

Mr. Bailey,
I commend you on pressing elected officials and State Education Department  officials to address the CCLS (Common Core Learning Standards). While I am not at the level of the individuals you spoke with and received the standard stock answer, I will say this to you: Interview the field: teachers, administrators and parents to get the “feel” of what this movement means. 
Then I’ll say to you, going back to Goals 2000  (initiated) by President Clinton, we have shifted from states running schools to the feds (Federal Government) running schools. Please keep in mind that the CCLS is a result of school districts across the country qualifying for federal money–a ton of money, unprecedented money–if they–

1. Support and open a plethora of Charter Schools

2. Adapt their performance metrics to federal requirements thus the APPR which hold principals and teachers to unprecedented and unrealistic accountability standards.
Susie Oppenheimer authored that bill to satisfy the feds request….and then she retired……………
We’ve lost the point of education because the children are “measures” interpreted by data that holds their performance directly related to the professionals in their lives; and we have dismissed childrens’ affective growth, maturity etc as incidentals that are not figured in the equation. 
IN NYC I can not tell you how many fragile lives have been disrupted because of DATA for  one or two points between a summer vacation with parents or a sweltering classroom with marginal remedial programs.
I share this with you because I know you care. There is no hidden agenda here.
The Educator
(Editor’s Note: the writer agreed to the publication of this letter with the understanding their name would not be published for fear of professional reprisal.)
Posted in Uncategorized

State Lags in Disclosing Details on How 2013 Assessments Were Created, Who Decided they were Appropriate and Who Approved Them. Test Creator Declines Comment.

Hits: 364

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. October 24, 2013:

The State Education Department has so far not provided clear details to WPCNR on how the controversial 2013 Common Core Curriculum Assessment tests were created.

Assemblywoman Amy Paulin said in a statement to this reporter, she favored opening a hearing or hearings with the SED and the teachers who worked with Pearson to develop the highly criticized tests is a good idea. George Latimer,State Senator for White Plains, told WPCNR hearings to explore how tests were created, would be a good idea but he wanted to wait until after the first Education Committee meeting in Buffalo coming up.

Meanwhile, who approved the content of the tests and why they were determined appropriate has not been detailed to this reporter after 4 days.

It appears that full-length mock tests were not given  during the development process to actual students to ascertain if the tests as planned could be managed by students in the time provided. No one has confirmed that there were mock tests, just sample questions.

Pearson, the national test creator evaluation firm, when contacted by WPCNR and asked for details on how they prepare such assessments, declined to comment.

Last week, as previously reported by The Journal News Albany Bureau, Westchester Assembly Members  Amy Paulin, Thomas Abinanti and David Buchwald wrote a letter calling for suspension indefinitely of the Common Core Assessments,  saying the assessments (resulting in drops of 30% in the number of students passing the English Language Arts) were “doing more harm than good,” that a new assessment test needed to be prepared “that will improve the quality of teaching and learning” in the schools.

The three signees cited problems the new tests administered for the first time last year, “are not a valid indicator of college and career readiness,” citing as evidence for this judgment that in many districts a majority are accepted in colleges.

The three criticized the tests based on teachers’ reports that “questions were too vague and did not align with the common core curriculum/content.”  Students were frustrated.  The assemblypersons cited the sharp increase and lack of teacher resources and money to address the resulting Academic Intervention Services, the results of the test dictate.

The letter revealed that teachers are not allowed to see completed tests for each student (in order that they may identify the student’s weaknesses and work with the student). They also felt the new tests were an unfair measure of teachers’ effectiveness, due to their unfairness.

The letter cautioned that the costs of administering the tests by the districts is causing budget stress, and the three pointed out that computerized test taking scheduled for 2015 (14 months away) creates another financial stress on the district.

O’Donovan of White Plains on the test problems.

WPCNR first became aware of possible problems in creating the tests when White Plains Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum and Instruction Jessica O’Donovan told me on the news interview show, People To Be Heard, (availble for viewing on www.whiteplainsweek.com)  school districts had never received typical sample tests in their entirety to work with in preparation. Only handfuls of sample questions were received. She pointed out that the tests required too much referencing back to written tracts, extending the time spent for each question.

I contacted Susan Aspey, V.P. of Public Relations with Pearson (Pearson International and Pearson North America, 2nd largest publishing company in the world)  in Washington,D.C., asking how the 2013 assessments were created, and for an interview with a Pearson personality who could explain the test creation,  she gave me this statement, apparently declining an interview:

“Pearson is the vendor to New York State. We do not set states’ policies; our role is to help our state customers implement their policies and programs.  Your questions are best directed to the state Department of Education.”

This information lead WPCNR to ask the State Education Department about how the tests were created.

I asked Dennis Tompkins head of the SED Press Relations, who were the members of the Board of Regents who approved the content of the new Grade 3 to 8 2013 Assessments, to describe the process by which Pearson developed and “vetted” the new tests. I also asked if a sample test in its entirety was ever administered to test grades within New York State.

Tompkins wrote WPCNR:

“I’ll get you answers to your questions asap, but be advised Board of Regents members do not get involved in test development. That’s done by (SED) staff experts in conjunction with teachers across the state.”

(WPCNR has requested an interview with Education Commissioner John King to discuss the assessments on PEOPLE TO BE HEARD. Mr. Tompkins is working on setting that up.)

I asked Assemblywoman Amy Paulin of the 88th A.D. the same questions:

She issued me this statement Wednesday:

“I am not familiar with who or how the tests were designed.

However, after meeting with the superintendents and assistant superintendents for curriculum in the 88th A.D. regarding the shift in the Common Core  Learning Standards (CCLS) assessments.

I am convinced that the newly created tests are not a valid measure of whether students are college or career ready, which is the intended purpose of the assessments. I support the CCLS and believe that we need to pilot an improved assessment program that will be used as a model for many years to come

Holding a hearing an open meeting with those at SED (State Education Department) or with teachers who worked with Pearson is a good idea. Given the importance of these tests, I believe greater transparency is necessary.

When a student’s self-esteem and a teacher’s reputation or career path is at stake, we must make absolutely sure that tests used to measure student achievement and teacher effectiveness are accurately aligned to the curriculum and will produce valid, reliable results. Currently this is not the case.

Ms. Paulin said she did not know what individuals with the  Board of Regents and State Education Department had responsibility for approving the content of the Pearson-created Assessment Tests.

She said she did not know if any mock full-length “prototype assessments” were pretested by Pearson or the State Education Department on groups of students to judge whether the test format and projected content was reasonable on target for skill levels  for the length of time required or to judge if it was too harsh.

She wanted to hear from Pearson and the SED on how the tests were prepared  and why they felt the content of the tests was in line with the curriculum.

She did not know how much preparation of the tests by Pearson cost the state and was unaware of how other states had tested on Common Core aligned assessments.

Assemblyman David Buchwald, through his press spokesperson, Dan Weisfeld, released this statement when asked Mr. Buchwald’s response to the above questions:

“All the information that the Assemblyman (Buchwald) has to convey at this time can be found in the letter (sent Tuesday). If you have additional questions on the subject, I’d suggest you reach out to the Westchester-Putnam School Boards Association (WPSBA) who would be quite helpful on local education issues.”

Pressed on whether Mr. Buchwald thought hearings should be held on how the tests were created and why they were deemed appropriate, (and, of course how any new pilot assessment should be created)  Mr.Weisfeld furnished this statement:

“Assemblyman Buchwald is not a member of the Education  Committee, which would be in the position to make those kinds of decisions. While we appreciate your (WPCNR’s) understandable focus on broader educational issues, the Assemblyman thinks it’s appropriate to wait for a reaction (from the Board of Regents) before commenting on potential other items.”

Thomas Abinanti, the third Assemblyman to sign the letter to Board of Regents Chancellor, Merryl H. Tisch, has not yet responded to WPCNR’s questions. We await his reponse.

WPCNR has also asked Mr. Tompkins, the SED spokesperson for Commissioner of Education John King’s reaction to the Assemblypersons’ letter, whether he will suspend the 2014 tests, for example.

The Commissioner of Education has established the following dates for resumption of his listening tours to hear reaction to the assessments, that he at first cancelled after an unruly first hearing, then was persuaded to reinstate. The dates:

October 24 Capital District
Myers Middle School
Albany
4:00-7:00 PM
October 28 Westchester
November 6 Long Island –   Suffolk
November 7 Rochester
November 13 Long Island –   Nassau
November 25 Southern Tier
December 3 Syracuse
December 9 Long Island –   Nassau

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Letter to Albany: Three Assemblypersons Call for Suspension of 2014 Assessments

Hits: 2728

WPCNR FOR THE RECORD. From Assemblyman David Buchwald (93rd Assembly District. October 24, 2013:

Three Assemblypersons after interviews with Superintendents and Assistant Superintendents of Schools recommended the Board of Regents of the State of New York suspend the 2014 Common Core Learning Standards Assessments this year, declaring the tests a failure, and not reflective of the real readiness of students to attend college. They also cited sharply increased costs due to more student Academic Intervention Services based on the 30 to 35% drop in test score passing rates, even in what were thought to be the area’s top school districts.

Here is a copy of that letter:

20131018paulin 001

TheText:

October 21, 2013

Chancellor Merryl H. Tisch

NYS Board of Regents

89 Washington Avenue

Albany, New York 12234

Dear Chancellor Tisch:

We believe the current testing program has the potential of doing more harm than good for both students and teachers. While we support the new Common Core Learning Standards (CCLS) and recognize that it must include an assessment component, we believe the shift in the assessments to measure the CCLS is not working. For the following reasons, we urge you to discontinue the current use of the Common Core English Language Arts (ELA) and math assessments and develop and pilot an assessment program that will improve the quality of teaching and learning in our schools.

 

1. The current ELA and math assessments are not a valid indicator of college or career readiness. This year, most school districts saw a passing rate inconsistent with the expected achievement of their students. If you looked at the passing rate on the 8th grade math and ELA scores you would conclude that most students will do poorly in high school and struggle in college. Historically, this has not been the case. For example, Pelham, a school district that has spent the past two years diligently aligning instruction and curriculum to the CCLS, saw its scores drop by about 20% in ELA and math, leaving the impression that its students are not prepared for a challenging curriculum. However, a similar cohort of students have traditionally performed very well on the algebra and English regents and have been successful throughout their high school career, taking advanced placement and college level courses, engaging in scientific research, and excelling in academic competitions. This past year, 95% of Pelham’s seniors were accepted into four-year colleges, 66% of which are ranked as “most,” “highly” or “very” competitive.

The only conclusion we can draw is that these new tests are not a valid measure of whether a student will succeed in college or in a career.

2. The new tests are not improving learning.

The shift to align the assessments with the common core curriculum has led to longer tests (i.e. an increase in the number and complexity of multiple-choice questions on the ELA tests). Also, teachers have reported that many of the questions were too vague and did not align with the common core curriculum/content. Students who do not have the stamina to take longer tests or who get frustrated when faced with new material often just give up (which could be skewing the results). While students everywhere are exhibiting test anxiety, we are especially concerned about low performing students who get frustrated more easily. This could result in an antipathy toward learning. These recent test results have presented our schools with an additional significant challenge. Academic intervention services (AIS) were historically provided to any student in grades 3-8 who scored below proficiency on math or ELA. This year, districts reported that there just was not enough money in their budgets (nor was any forthcoming from the State) to cover the rise in the number of students eligible for AIS. Further, districts’ staffing needs were established during last year’s budget process. There is no way they could have anticipated the additional staffing needs required to support the many more students who now need AIS. Granting school districts greater leeway in determining which students should receive remedial help by setting a “threshold” score begs the questions: if the tests are a valid measure of student achievement then why do districts need to manipulate the scores and why are we denying low- scoring students the support services they truly need?

3. The new tests are not improving instruction.

Currently, teachers are not allowed to see the completed tests for each student; they receive only an aggregate score. Districts require more than just sampling or model questions to improve instruction. Individual test items must be provided so that meaningful programmatic adjustments can be made for each child and for the entire class. Also, as it stands now, teachers receive the test results well into the following school year denying them the opportunity to adjust lesson plans for the entering class. Teachers need to receive the results before the start of the school year. Just recently, we read that NYC schools had not received the new English and math text- books and other materials which match the tougher CCLS, presenting yet another reason to slow down the shift in assessments. There is a lot at stake – a child’s self esteem and a teacher’s reputation and perhaps career path are tied to these tests, putting a lot of pressure on both teachers and students to do well. We feel that teachers need this valuable time to teach critical thinking skills in an unpressured, stimulating environment.

4. The new tests are not a reliable measure of a teacher’s ability.

While the aggregate number of teachers falling into the State’s “effective” and “highly effective” categories has remained constant for two years, the rating system is less reliable when applied to an individual teacher. Too many teachers who were rated “highly effective” or “effective” last year were rated “ineffective” this year. Teachers do not change dramatically in one year. Receiving a low grade, especially after receiving a high grade in the prior year, is demoralizing and is not a reliable indicator of performance. Fortunately, most districts have adopted evaluation plans that minimize the impact of any one score. However, once the information is made public, a teacher is branded.

5. The cost of testing is creating financial hardship especially on school districts with fewer resources. Two districts, Locust Valley and Scarsdale, have estimated the cost of testing at between $2.5 and $2 million (includes the cost of data collection and lost teaching time), respectively. The cost may be higher for a larger district. While most school districts are struggling to stay within the tax cap, poorer districts have found it an even greater challenge and have already cut staff and programs, increased class size, and eliminated extra-curricula or enrichment programs. Running out of options, they will have to dig even deeper to meet their financial obligations to the detriment of the students.

The mandate to use computers for on-line testing by 2015 is another financial and educational dilemma for most school districts. Many districts, but especially the poorer ones, just do not have the technical capability nor the financial resources to implement this mandate by 2015. Also, all districts will be forced to give up instructional time by using the computer lab exclusively for testing. Schools and students have come to rely on computer labs for instruction, homework, and research assignments, all of which will be curtailed by this mandate.

We believe that State Education Department is moving too fast. We urge you to take the time to design an exemplary testing program that will be used as a model for improving teaching and learning for many years to come. Thank you for your consideration and for all that you do for the students of New York State.

 

Sincerely, Amy R. Paulin Thomas J. Abinanti David Buchwald Member of Assembly Member of Assembly Member of Assembly Cc: Vice Chancellor, Anthony Bottar Dr. James Dawson Dr. Geraldine Chapey Harry Phillips, 3rd James R. Tallon, Jr. Roger Tilles Charles R. Bendit Dr. Betty Rosa Dr. Lester W. Young, Jr. Dr. Christine D. Cea Wade S. Norwood

 Dr. James O. Jackson Dr. Kathleen M. Cashin Dr. James E. Cottrell

 T. Andrew Brown

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Astorino-Bramson Blow-By-Blow: Astorino promises holding Tax Levy to 2013 Level.

Hits: 493

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2013. By John F. Bailey. October 23, 2013:

The most interesting statement of the night in the Tuesday Astorino-Bramson County Executive debate was Mr. Astorino saying in response to a News 12 woman-in-the-street question recorded earlier, he would not raise the 2014 budget and would again lower county property taxes 2%.

His spokesperson William O’Reilly told WPCNR Wednesday evening Mr. Astorino misspoke last night in the heat of the debate, saying, “What he meant is that he has pledged not to raise the tax levy.  Not sure if we can reduce it with pension pressures.”

Here is the blow-by-blow of the Tuesday evening County Executive debate between incumbent Robert P. Astorino and New Rochelle Mayor, Noam Bramson as WPCNR saw it from “ringside.” WPCNR recommends seeing the debate for yourself in the repeats being run on News 12.

Let’s go to the round by round, blow by blow:

At the Opening Bell, Astorino said  the county has turned around under his keeping costs in check philosophy “in contrast to my opponent in New Rochelle, we choose to have Westchester live within our means, sticking to my three P’s, Preserving critical services,Promotion of economic growth, Preserving communities character (against federal attempts at dictating zoning.

Bramson brushed off this gambit, expressing the campaign was about “two different approaches” to county government,  notably sensitivity – caring about preserving child care preventing unemployment, saving money by sharing services between communities in a more efficient manner, caring about a woman’s right to abortion and opposing the gun lobby, and creating jobs by improving planning, rezoning to open up areas to bring in companies and create jobs, and improving work skills of county workers to supply the skills companies need. He took Mr. Astorino to task for an administration of “confrontation and conflict” that “hasn’t worked.” Bramson characterized the election as a choice between himself, “a Clinton Mainstream Democrat” and a “Tea Party Representative.”

With three reporters asking questions Round One began:

Janine Rose of News 12  started asking if they thought the Tappan Zee construction was safe for boating public. Astorino immediately took credit for holding out for Mass Transit on the new bridge—later in the debate Bramson mocked this but Astorino countered that by noting that the bridge could not proceed without his vote (as Westchester County Executive), until mass transit was included. Astorino also slipped in that 39 of 41 unions have endorsed him, and his economic growth efforts had produced 27,000 new jobs.

Bramson countered saying “don’t take credit for other people’s work,” and on mass transit, you “have to get mass transit right,” saying Astorino had not paid attention to where mass bus rapid transit was going to go and “how it would integrate into the larger (transit) system. “

Astorino noted that the plan for Bus Rapid Transit (presumably with station locations) being developed by the Mass Transit Task Force of which he is a member is coming out in 60 days.

In Round Two- Gerald McKinstry of WVOX  raised the tax question of holding property taxes down.

Bramson waded in swinging, saying property taxes had gone up $800 Million in four years. He preached the homily of sharing services as the way to trim costs of city and county property taxes if school districts and cities, towns “worked together.” He said he would help facilitate that. He did not say if he would dictate consolidations (presumably because the county can’t do that). He said that would be a priority in his administration

Mr. Astorino pointed out how the county has done that, taking over policing for Ossining and partially for Tuckahoe, but it had to come at request of the towns because he could not impose it. He pointed out that a large part of New Rochelle  property taxes were due to Bramson raising taxes 7% a year for the last four years while he Astorino reduced the property tax countywide 2% in 2013. Mr.Astorino took the tax-and-spend haymaker to Mr. Bramson’s glass jaw every round.

Then came the shocker of the night:

Astorino responding to a question posed by a woman in the street, recorded earlier by News 12, promised to hold the county property taxes even in his budget for 2014 and cut property taxes 2% again in the new budget early on in response to a citizen-question. As we note at the top of this recap, his campaign has clarified that Mr. Astorino misspoke, that he promises to hold the tax levy at 2013 levels.

No one asked him how though in subsequent questioning.

The Westchester County Business Journal reporter asked whether Governor Cuomo’s Tax Free Zones for college sites might effect the county, or negatively.

The County Executive allowed they could be helpful, but slammed the tax message, saying, “We brought tax stability to this county.” He cited creating a climate where Regeneron is building two new buildings and adding 500 jobs. Authorizing through his idea, the Local Development Corporation, a  $250 Million in tax-free lending to White Plains Hospital Medical Center to expand their campus, and similar aid to Phelps Memorial in Tarrytown and Northern Westchester.

Mr. Bramson fired back, pointing out there are still 6 million square of office space vacant in the county. He said the county should be rezoning areas to make locations more attractive to companies looking at Westchester, and work to upgrade skill sets of county workforce to meet companies’ needs.

Astorino deftly brought the development problem back to taxes saying the problem was not what Westchester offers, but its tax structure—bringing up the 109% number that he says Bramson and the New Rochelle government raised taxes in 16 years (since 1996).  “That is unacceptable to businesses and homeowners.”

Bramson dropped his guard against this, not even defending it,  saying, “We’ve got to get beyond slogans. New Rochelle has the lowest municipal tax rate among Westchester cities.”

(Editor’s Note: The trouble with this is it is not. White Plains at $191.74 per $1,000 of assessed valuation, is lower than New Rochelle’s rate of $198.50 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. Bramson has not explained to WPCNR what his definition of the tax rate is).

Bramson also said Astorino while on the Board in Mount Pleasant presided over tax raises of 50%. Astorino brushed this aside, saying in his (Astorino’s four years running the county) Mr. Bramson in New Rochelle raised taxes 16.7% , 4.1% a year,  and school taxes in New Rochelle rose 11-1/2% due to Bramson’s Avalon deal that brought 150 children into the district. “7% (tax increases, combined) is unacceptable.” Astorino also said the county property taxes under his leadership had declined 4.9% at the same time.

And so it went.

Janine Rose returned to questioning the pair on whether a “slightly larger” new Tappan Zee Bridge without a rail rapid transit system was right.

Noam Bramson  said, “If that’s where we stop it. BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) is a train-like vehicle  with station-like stops, a conversation that should be unfolding right now.” He expressed that the county should be working harder assuring the construction and design of routes that will not “clog roads assuring livable cities.”

The incumbent County Executive said “No we don’t need it (rail transit).” He said it would be billions more expensive and drive tolls and taxes higher. He said he was a member of the Mass Transit Task Force (that meets this Friday at the White Plains Public Library, by the way). He said the thinking presently will feature “a hybrid of I-287 and route 119 with stops in Tarrytown, Elmsford and White Plains, with shuttles to the office parks.”

Bramson gamely tried to battle the “Astorinoizers” criticizing New Rochelle taxes. “Getting back to New Rochelle, I’ve been elected five times by the people of New Rochelle. They know my record despite the negative and dishonest claims (of my opponent).”

Astorino smiling broadly, said “109% over 16 years.” He said Westchester was one of only four counties in the state that had cut taxes over the last four years , and Westchester was the leader at 15%.

Bramson defended his pay increase in 2006, saying in Mount Pleasant when Mr. Astorino was on the board there, Astorino went along with  8 pay raises for the board and supervisor in 11 years, a 49% pay increase. “This is hypocrisy (on Astorino’s part).

Astorino redfaced, said when he came in to the County Executive office, “taxes exploding has its own living cost.” He said his support of Tier 6 pension reform was an effort to control the pension costs driving up taxes, and said he would work more for pension reform. The incumbent County Executive said he had cut taxes and “bucked bad habits of the past.” He said he cut county staff 19% and gotten 7 of 8 unions to pay a portion of their health care costs. (The 8th, the Civil Services Employees Association, Astorino said later “is running phonebanks for my opponent.” Bramson had the last word, saying he (Bramson) had one raise in 18 years. Bramson did not say how much staff he had cut in New Rochelle.

On a question about IDAs (Industrial Development Agencies), Bramson said they can be “great tools,” if we make sure companies do what they promise to do.  He said over 20 years he had brought in hundreds of jobs, and development worth $8.5 Million in revenue every single year. “I know what it takes to develop an economy: planning, infrastructure, land use, skills (in the workforce.”

Astorino retorted he had done exactly that for the county: bringing in 27,000 new jobs. He pointed out how in his opinion Bramson management of the New Rochelle Echo Bay development had resulted in loss of major revenue, by eliminating hotels and the amount of retail planned. Bramson, said the waterfront would be revitalized, creating a park. Astorino said for half a day the Echo Bay waterfront would be mudflats (suggested dredging has been eliminated from the plan).

Asked about plans for the future, Bramson captured some momentum in the debate, saying “What are we going to do for the future? It is wrong to cut child care. Wrong to close neighborhood health centers, wrong to permit gun shows, wrong to fail to protect reproductive and abortion clinics.These are dumb choices”

Astorino countered, saying private sector workers average $63,000 a year, public sector employees in the county average $73,000, and when public employee benefits are added, the cost goes up to $110,000. “You have to strike a healthy balance between tax raises and expenditures.”

The county HUD settlement produced an interesting exchange. Astorino defended his defiance of HUD policy on adjusting zoning in communities HUD has found to be allegedly discriminatory in its zoning against the kind of buildings that can provide affordable housing.  Astorino aid first that the county has only spent $13,908 in legal costs in fighting HUD on the terms of the proposal. He said the county already had 400 of 750 units on the way. Reading from HUD letters on camera, he quoted HUD backing his position that HUD wants more than 750 units. He said, “We will not allow the federal government to control land use (in the communities).”

Bramson saw an opening and wound up, saying it was time “to put this behind us.” He accused Astorino policy of losing $20 million in withheld government funds.  Bramson repeated he will work with communities to find ways to get the housing into the communities.  Astorino  accused Bramson, in Astorino’s rebuttal of a policy of “capitulation and compromise.”

On the values issues, Bramson  hammered that Astorino’s stances on protecting abortion clinics, allowing gunshows, cutting child care were against national policies and county sentiment.

Astorino said he took those positions because the abortion clinic protection legislation he vetoed was an invitation to lawsuits against the county; Gunshow promoters had a right to put on gun shows, and they were allowed to do so only after county

At the final bell, Bramson speaking first made a final statement, saying “What you do counts. We have to cut costs and we can afford to be better.” He accused Astorino of fomenting an atmosphere of “unproductive conflict we don’t need. I will work with people to get things done.”

Astorino said, “64% of county persons polled recently said they think the county is on the right track.” Bramson has “pummeled the taxpayers (in New Rochelle) and he (Bramson) will do it again. I will stand up for private property owners. I will stand up for the taxpayers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized