White Plains Police and Demonstrations.

Hits: 125

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. December 7, 2014:

The following was sent in by the President of the White Plains Police Benevolent Association:

Dear Mr. Bailey,
 
On behalf of the White Plains Police Benevolent Association, I would like to thank you for your recent article on your site entitled, Interacting With The Police Is Common Sense.
 
I would also like to give credit where credit is due and that would be to the City of White Plains Police Department. Over the past few weeks we have seen some horrible riots and destruction to personal property and the burning of not only businesses but also police vehicles over the largely broad casted decisions of the Michael Brown and Eric Gardner cases.
 
Since these decisions, the City of White Plains has had two demonstrations.  One was a large group of White Plains High School students who marched from the school to downtown White Plains.  The other was a “Die In” at Fountain Park.  They were both peaceful and orderly, with no unruly acts of violence. The White Plains Police Department provided for a safe environment for the protesters in both instances. During and after the demonstrators were finished marching, they shook hands with many of our Officers thanking them for doing their job and keeping them safe.
 
I can truly say that this is a true testament to the training, training, and more training that the White Plains Police Department gives its officers. Officers have been instructed for years on how to interact with emotionally disturbed people, cultural diversity, verbal de-escalation, and also dealing with people as human beings. We are taught one of the most important rules in life, and that’s to treat people the way we would like to be treated. Our Department leaders have set a very high standard on the way Officers are to deal with the public.
 
Again I would like to commend all of our men and woman for their outstanding dedication and hard work in keeping our residents and visitors safe on a daily basis, especially during these peaceful protests.
 
I would also like to thank Commissioner Chong, Chief Bradley, and Assistant Chief Fitzsimmons for providing the classes and resources that we need to get the job done and keep everyone safe.  I would also like to thank the Command Staff and Police Supervisors responsible for the Protest Detail, who were on the ground and handling the safety of all involved.
 
Mr. Bailey, in closing, I would also like to add to your article that there are three things the public needs to know about contacts with the police.
 
1. Be courteous 
2. Be cooperative
3. Be compliant
 
These three things will foster a better experience with the police.
   
Robert T. Riley
President
White Plains Police Benevolent Association
“Our Strength Lies In Our Unity”
Posted in Uncategorized

INTERACTING WITH POLICE IS COMMON SENSE.

Hits: 239

WPCNR POLICE GAZETTE. News & Comment from John F. Bailey. December 6, 2014:

In view of the protests against the deaths of minority teenagers and adults in an epidemic of police shootings and grapple-to-death incidents, I think some perspective has to be applied here.

For the person who is of color and not white who is stopped by police, but even if you are a white teen or adult stopped by police or told to stop some behavior, you have to realize that your reputation has been fixed in the minds of law enforcement in a negative profile by decades of poor choices by minority community members who have chosen anti-social and criminal behavior, not unlike the robber barons who steal big time in carpeted crags in concrete canyons.

This profiling of minorities ,has created an attitude on the part of police that you as a minority walking around in a group might be acting like a criminal and breaking the law and up to no good.

The difference between throwing bricks into store fronts and looting and creating “creative investment instruments” and losing the occasional $6 Billion and not being held accountable for it, is that the latter crimes are committed by folks in three piece suits, white shirts and are mostly white.  Multi Billlion Dollar fraud is not something the street police have to deal with on a regular basis. And nobody cares strongly about stopping Gazillion Dollar Frauds because that’s “just business,” it’s “clever.”

Never mind the fact that it is very easy to steal from a person that trusts you. Being a criminal is not glamorous. It takes no great skill you just betray a person’s trust.

However, indulging in criminal-like behavior or appearing to threaten a police officer, is what it is and if you’re participating even peripherally in a situation where this is going on, you could get hurt.

So I have this to suggest to protestors reacting and our young people righteously aggrieved about the amazing police violence incidents that have piled up recently:

You have to adjust your behavior to avoid the least possible chance you will antagonize a police officer’s self-protection instinct.

If you are in a protest, where folks around you are doing things slightly irresponsible like setting police cars on fire, you have to get on out of there.

This rioting and looting is really stupid, so I suggest that it cannot possibly be the work of actual residents of the neighborhood. The burners and looters should be rounded up, jailed and prosecuted.

But of course, that would be brutality if any of those wonderful vandals were hurt by the police.

Most of those people, and I am generalizing here, could not give a wit about the death of an individual they do not even know.

They see it as a chance to do pyschopathic  “God knows what” destruction, letting appetites for excess run wild with protest as an excuse.

I mean, who does those things anyway like setting police cars on fire, breaking glass in neighborhood stores, looting — trashing the economy of your own neighborhood.

Is there a service business of goons whom national protestors call up to escalate these riots to assure television coverage and impact opinion?

Where is the NSA, the FBI, and the CIA on these well-organized trashing orchestrations?

Detroit still has not recovered from the 1967 riot. South Detroit is a disgrace of overgrown fields, abandoned houses and boarded up stores to this day.

That being said, young readers and you older protestors, too, The least belligerence or defiance escalates the chance officers will view you as a threat to them.

To that end, and in view that I have a tanned complexion, look somewhat “terroristy” and drive a disruputable looking black Animal House  car I offer some strategies that have worked in my very limited engagements with police.

Instead of unleashing righteous anger. Defuse your situation. I suggest the following conduct:

1. Be polite when the officer detains you. Say, “Yes, officer?”

2. Ask permission to reach into a pocket of a jacket or coat, or if driving, the glove compartment of your car.

3.If approached by an officer because of what you are doing, stop doing it   Freeze, show hands in wide display and say, “Yes, officer?”  In fact always show open palms in plain sight. If the officer indicates he’s cuffing you, let him or her do it. 

4. Show identification if asked for it. Volunteer name and address and where you’re from.

5.Do not open your mouth and object to what the officer is asking you to do.(Very key behavior to avoid escalation of officer attitude.) Also do not tell an officer who you are and how important you are.  Cooperate.

6. Do not engage the officer physically, push him or her, threaten or be belligerent in any way, or worse, use foul language and call the officer “expletives.”

7. This is a key thing: do not under any circumstances draw a weapon, or what could be construed by the officer to be a weapon.

This is threatening an officer and you are wrong. (The 12 year old, killed when pointing a toy gun at police in Cleveland, is an example of how threatening an officer even in jest can turn into horror.)

8. Do not use foul or abusive language to the officer. That could be construed to be disorderly conduct. (Ask yourself how you would react if someone called you an expletive deleted in anger?)

9. Do not throw rocks, objects or anything at an officer. That’s assault.

10. Obey instructions to the letter. That includes stopping when the officer tells you to do so.

Bare in mind you have rights but you do not have the rights to threatening behavior or to do the officer harm, just because you are engaging in behavior unbecoming any person black, white, swarthy, bearded, or in a three-piece suit.

11. You have a right to protest, but no right to push, shove, threaten other citizens or police officers.

12. Try being polite and respectful to a police officer, treat him or her as you would your pastor, priest, or Pope.

Now, Grand Jury failure to indict does not give any community the right to destroy private property.

Imagine if everytime a Wall Street “creative” executive was not indicted, if consumers losing money attempted to burn the stock exchange or the bank. We can’t have THAT, right?

But minority neighborhood businesses the salt of the earth, are allowed to burn? Stop it and arrest those vandals.

The circumstances involving the deaths of recent blacks killed as the result of police officer actions are a direct result of their failure to comply with police instruction and reckless behavior. With the exception of the shooting of the young man simply exiting a building, the inexperience on the part of the officer having his gun drawn appears to have contributed to that horror.

The Garner death in Staten Island is interesting because Mr. Garner has had long experience with the police, he disobeyed instructions and the officer overreacted, clearly. Do not disobey instructions. If you do, ensuing actions to get you to comply really depend on the cool of the police officer and his or her ability to control their actions.

Another thing, if a person pulls a knife and charges at officers, and an officer shoots to wound and protect a fellow officer, and a rechochet off bone kills the person — THAT should be written about and explained by the media, when that person is cited as an example of police overreaction. All that person had to do was go along with officer instruction when first asked.

I do have a suggestion though next time any community desires to stage a spontaneous demonstration to protest a police incident, hire lawyers to observe and calm down the situation.

Have the legal observers  where big slickers reading “LEGAL” on their backs. It would tame matters down.

Another factor that escalates these protests is television coverage.

NBC Television in Ferguson actually did what I would characterize as “preriot” cheerleading that had a reporter telling Brian Williams, “tension is rising,”  (almost saying, without saying, what are you waiting for — riot), then the cameras showed a police car being burned.

Come on. The reporter should have asked the police car torchers if they ordinarily bring igniting fluids when they go out on a protest. The media presence was egging the crowd on, in my opinion.

Since I do not have police officer training, I cannot really comment with authority on how police can adjust their behavior to handle the unexpected or interaction.

I would be afraid to do their job.

But I invite any law enforcement sources to write me and advise of how police are trained to reaction in these confrontations when trying to stop behavior that is getting out of hand , or arriving on the scene at investigations.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

WHITE PLAINS WEEK THE LATEST EDITION ON THE NET

Hits: 149

WhitePlainsWeekkeysign

THE ONLY REAL LOCAL WHITE PLAINS NEWS SOURCE!

RELIED ON BY THE PEOPLE

 HATED BY EVIL DOERS EVERYWHERE

FOR 14 YEARS.

2014906 005

 ON LINE ON TARGET 

2014829airforceone 053

JOHN BAILEY

UNDISPUTED NEWS LEADER FOR 15 YEARS

 008

JIM BENEROFE

COVERING WHITE PLAINS FOR

39 YEARS

ON

THE FASNY HEARINGS END.

THE MOTHER OF ALL DRUG BUSTS.

THE FASNY QUESTIONS ON THE TABLE

WILL THEY BE RESOLVED IN PUBLIC OR UNDER THE TABLE?

THE NATIONAL PROTESTS AGAINST POLICE BEHAVIOR

WPW HOW TO GET ALONG WITH YOUR LOCAL POLICEMEN

THE CITY MAKEOVERS PLANNED FOR WESTMORELAND AND WESTCHESTER AVENUE

WALKING POMPEII

AND ON PEOPLE TO BE HEARD

YOU’VE GOT

IMG_6937[1]

TIM CONNORS

INTERIM SUPERINTENDENT OF WHITE PLAINS SCHOOLS

ON

THE STATE OF THE SCHOOLS; TESTING MADNESS;

THE BUDGET AHEAD.

THE TROUBLE WITH THE TESTS

SEE THE NEWS DOUBLEHEADER ON THE INTERNET AT 

www.whiteplainsweek.com

IMG_6936[1]

PEOPLE TO BE HEARD

“The Program Where People Who Have Something to Say

Have Their Say”

MAY BE SEEN AT ITS

NEW DAY AND TIME:

WEDNESDAYS 10:30

THURSDAYS, 8 P.M.

ON VERIZON CHANNEL 45

ON CABLEVISION WHITE PLAINS TV 76

 

Posted in Uncategorized

“Truth Police” Call for Open Process to Answer Final Critical Questions Raised at Wednesday Night Hearings That Finally Ended. Chide Council for

Hits: 128

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. December 4, 2014:

The Common Council officially closed the French American School of New York hearings Wednesday evening with the critical issues of traffic volume in the peak hour; North Street backup, effect on fire response time of Hathaway Lane closure and penalty plan for limiting completion of the proposed project suggested by the Mayor up in the air.

The Gedney Association team of Ron and Marie Rhodes responded with their reactions on last night:

Dear Mayor and Common Council,
 
Our thanks to those Common Council members who challenged FASNY with difficult questions last night. . .however for those who couldn’t even come up with at least one good question to ask the FASNY Representatives. . .hopefully you’re addressing the key issues behind the scenes.
 
And if the Big Picture issues with FASNY are. . .Traffic, 10-year Construction, Water, Increases in Fire Response Times, Decreases in Property Values and our School Children’s Safety. . .those of you ignoring the key issues to focus on questions involving the positioning of tennis courts are way out of the mainstream and reality. 
 
After almost 4 years we still have more questions than answers on this FASNY project. 
 
For instance on Traffic how come FASNY still hasn’t disclosed:
 
How many Vehicle Trips will FASNY be making into our neighborhood each day in the AM and in the what % increase will this be over our existing Traffic levels w/o FASNY?
 
How their 530 cap number is calculated with their 950 students and 250 staff the majority of whom we learned last night will arrive within the 8AM to 9AM peak hour?  We say at these FASNY student and staff levels the 530 number is mathematically impossible.
 
And how will their electronic Vehicle Counting System work for parent car drop-offs outside of the FASNY property?  For instance how will students who will be dropped off by the Lee or Divney residences or other places outside the FASNY campus be counted? 
 
Why hasn’t FASNY introduced any mitigation to address the Safety concerns raised by the Board of Education?  We say because at volume of Traffic is planning no mitigation is feasible.  
 
Will this Common Council show the same concern about the Safety of our own WP School Children?
 
Why would you close Hathaway Lane, a Public Street, only for the benefit of FASNY, a Private Developer?
 
And what Benefits do your constituents receive from the Closure of Hathaway Lane or from the overall FASNY project?
 
And there’s more questions on key issues besides Traffic that remain unanswered on this FASNY project.
 
 
With regard to the way the Common Council closed last night’s meeting:
 
For almost 4 years the Common Council has asked residents to send comments. . .which we did along with questions about the FASNY project. . .most of which this Common Council choose not to ask the FASNY Representatives while they were being questioned, including last night.  How will all the FASNY responses promised to the City and all of the resident, never asked or answered FASNY questions get addressed?  Will it be behind closed doors in secret by FASNY and City Staff personnel. . .who residents to be honest have little confidence in?  Would you call this process transparent?
 
We would say that the FASNY review process the City established has been flawed and discriminates against your own residents and taxpayers. . .while the FASNY Representatives, who are trying to build a 53-acre campus in a residential neighborhood have been asked fewer questions over a 4-year period. . .than a small business owner who wants to open a bar on Mamaroneck Avenue and is applying for a cabaret license. . .would be asked by the City! 
 
It’s a strange review process the City created. . .which allowed FASNY to get away with submitting thousands of pages of unimportant paper. . .with the City ignoring and not demanding accurate facts and responses on the key issues like Traffic. . .made more difficult by some Common Council members not reading all the materials and ignoring Big Picture questions.
 
Going forward to get back on track. . .our suggestion is instead of winding up the FASNY Review in secret behind closed doors, without resident involvement. . .have FASNY, not City consultants, answer all our resident questions.  And when all the remaining FASNY information is finally submitted. . .give a final summary point by point of all of the key issues. . .about where the City stands with all of the FASNY information and requirements at another Public Meeting.  This would be more transparent for residents.
 
Does it seem to anyone else that  White Plains has. . .a Business Improvement Plan for the downtown area, that isn’t working. . .and a Residential Neighborhood Destruction Plan for the Southend, that the City Staff and FASNY are working their hardest together to implement?
 
We report. . .you decide.                                                                                                                                                      Your Truth Police, Team Rhodes
 
Marie and Ron Rhodes  
Posted in Uncategorized

Hearing that Never Ends Ends. Mayor and Council Close Hearings on FASNY Site Plan and Hathaway Lane Closure with Issues to Resolve With FASNY

Hits: 123

WPCNR SOUTH END TIMES. By John F.Bailey. December 3, 2014:

Mayor Tom Roach raised the most serious question of all Wednesday night  at what turned out to be the last combined public hearing on the French American School of New York Project:

The Mayor in his comments said  he felt the French American School of New York would have to assume some liability if the traffic count of 530 vehicles in the peak hour of 8 AM to 9 AM approached the area of 470 after the first phase of school construction was opened, the inference being that Phase II (building of the lower school might not be builet). You could have heard a pin drop.

20141204fasny 014

The Mayor’s inference that FASNY may have to drop the Phase II costruction of the lower school, set to be begin after the upper and middle schools are complete) if traffic pushed the preset limit of 530  was the first time the issue had been raised. The Mayor also spoke at length on stormwater management, a plan for which is being devised with Commissioner of Public Works, Joseph Nicoletti, but is not yet approved.

20141204fasny 006

At the outset of the meeting, Michael Zarin, the French American School of New York attorney, introduced a letter from the Army Corps of Engineers that had arrived late Wednesday afternoon at his offices, saying that there were three areas on the former golf course property they had jurisdiction over, but were not concerned over FASNY plans because no construction was being planned for them.

Zarin also noted a letter from Commissioner of Public Safety David Chong just received had indicated concern of lane widths of Hathaway Lane to be used by fire vehicles, but that has not been confirmed explicitly.

The combined hearing that never ends (The French American School of New York site plan and Hathaway Lane closure) was closed  by unanimous vote of the Common Council at 8:51 P.M. with major issues on fire response time raised by  Councilman John Martin, who said strongly that the comments of Fire Pro’s report ( commissioned and supplied by the Gedney Association) on response time had to be addressed;  landscaping, the  storm water pollution prevention plan, traffic issues on north street are still being strongly questioned by the Mayor Tom Roach, Councilman Dennis Krolian, Martin, Coucilwoman Milagros Lecuona, and Councilwoman Beth Smayda.Councilwoman Nadine Robinson did not make any comment according to an observer who filled WPCNR in on the first 10 minutes of audio-less telecast.

20141204fasny 007

Audio for the first 15 minutes of the meeting was not available, so the comments of Ms. Smayda was not heard by the home audience enjoying “Dinner with FASNY” on their television sets.

For three hours and 51 minutes,  the last of the FASNY public hearings  played out with the public being admonished four times  by the Mayor to resist vocal pleasure or disagreement with what was said.

Councilman Krolian when Mayor Roach called to close the hearings at about 8:45 P.M. asked the Mayor when the council would have time to question requested information from FASNY asked for in this evening’s hearing. Mayor Roach said he would extend the comment period to 15 days from this evening for the public to render comment. The Mayor indicated that the French American School of New York would present their answers  to Council questions and resolve the issues with the staff and the council.

It is unclear whether FASNY comments in response to council questions raised tonight would be discussed in a public  Common Council work session or in private behind closed doors at city hall, and how those FASNY answers would be promulgated to the public before a vote was taken.
Councilwoman Milagros Lecuona ascertained that the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan was submitted in May by FASNY to the Commissioner of Public Works Joseph Nicoletti. Lecuona read a city ordinance that requires a storm water plan to be submitted before any site plan can be considered.
The FASNY attorney, Michael Zarin said a SWWPP plan had been submitted in May of this year and it was “accepted” but not approved. Zarin said the elements of the SWPPP were still being discussed and considered on an “ongoing, daily basis”  with the Commissioner.
Until that plan is “approved” by Mr. Nicoletti, the site plan cannot be voted upon by the Common Council.
20141204fasny 016
Posted in Uncategorized

Army Corps of Engineers Asserts Jurisdiction over Three Parcels of Wetlands BUT no construction is planned there FASNY Reports

Hits: 138

WPCNR SOUTH END TIMES. Observation of FASNY Hearing by John F. Bailey. December 3, 2014:

In the first 10 minutes of tonight’s hearing, representatives of The French American School of New York made public that the Army Corps of Engineers has informed the school that they have jurisdiction over three portions of the property, however no school construction is planned for those areas.

This development  would seem to indicate to this observer that the Army Corps of Engineers has no problem with the construction of buildings affecting other parts of the property, and the hope of adversaries to the plan that the Army Corps would find the project objectionable appear to not be a factor in whether or not the project site plan under review would be stopped.

Presently  the French American School of New York representative Michael Zarin is being quizzed by Councilman Dennis Krolian in a somewhat heated  discussion over FASNY supplying traffic accident information involving the Bryant and North Street area still not being supplied, the elimination of median space on North Street. proposed by the turn lane into FASNY, and a new development in which Department of Public Safety Commissioner David Chong’s concern over emergency vehicles being able to get through the proposed alternative routes from Fire Station 7. Krolian is currently reading the School Board Letter rejecting the project.

The hearing can be seen in progress on Cablevision Channel 76 in White Plains and on Verizon FIOS Channel 44.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

DRUG DRAGNET ENSNARES 80 INVOLVED IN STREET NARCOTICS IN WHITE PLAINS AND NEW ROCHELLE. 20 STILL AT LARGE.

Hits: 146

WPCNR MS. DISTRICT ATTORNEY. From the Westchester County District Attorney’s Office. December 3, 2014:

Westchester County District Attorney Janet DiFiore announced that “City Sweeper 2” a multi-agency, multi-jurisdictional street level narcotics investigation resulted in the arrests of approximately 33 individuals in the City of White Plains and 50 individuals in the City of New Rochelle. 

White Plains Commissioner of Public Safety, David Chong gave this statement to WPCNR this afternoon:

“The arrests were the result of a collaborative effort by our Narcotics Squad and New Rochelle’s Narcotics squad.  We were responding to community complaints of street level 
Drug dealing and the uptick in heroin related overdoses all over the tri-state region.  Agencies that assisted us included the FBI, the DEA, Westchester County Department of Public Safety, the NYPD and Parole.  The cases will be prosecuted by the Westchester County District Attorney.
 
Sweeps like this are not commonplace in White Plains as we have a good handle on illegal narcotics sales and enforcement of such crimes.  In this case we wanted to utilize the resources made available to us through the other agencies and we made our resources available to New Rochelle.
 
I think this sends a clear message that law enforcement has no borders in this County and that drug dealing will not be tolerated in the streets of White Plains,” Chong wrote WPCNR.

There are arrest warrants outstanding for approximately 20 additional individuals.

The seven-month long investigation by the White Plains Police Department, New Rochelle Police Department, Westchester County Police Department, DEA, FBI and the District Attorney’s office resulted in the charging of a total of 100 individuals for narcotics trafficking.

Each of the 100 subjects has, or will be charged upon their arrest with the street-level sales of controlled substances.

The majority of the sales involved crack-cocaine, although there were a number of heroin sales made throughout the investigation. There were also several sales of hydrocodone, PCP, morphine and fentanyl.

The purchases ranged in price from $20 to $100.

Indictments were obtained on 39 of the approximately 100 subjects of the investigation, and approximately 29 indictments have been unsealed to date in Westchester County Court, charging those 29 with:

  • two counts of Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree, class “B” Felonies,
  • two counts of Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree, class “B” Felonies.

“All levels of law enforcement, federal, county and local, collaboratively working together, coalesced, allowing this multi-faceted investigation to neutralize dozens of street level narcotics dealers. Of those who have been indicted, we intend to vigorously prosecute the individuals among them who have violent criminal histories or are significant dealers without drug problems.  However, we will certainly consider our judicial diversion drug treatment program as an alternative for those who have made these drug sales to support a serious drug problem of their own,” said District Attorney Janet DiFiore.

Since November 19th, 2014, in the City of White Plains, the White Plains Police Department has arrested approximately 33 individuals for drug sales.  Arrests of at least six more individuals are expected.

On December 3rd in the City of New Rochelle, the New Rochelle Police Department has arrested approximately 50 individuals and expects to arrest approximately 14 more.

Bail was set at various amounts for those charged in Westchester County Court. The other individuals have been in arraigned in the City Courts of New Rochelle and White Plains.

Defendants who have prior felony convictions face a maximum of twelve years in prison.  Those without prior convictions face a maximum of nine years in prison.

Assistant District Attorney Tom Luzio, Chief of the Narcotics Bureau, and Assistant District Attorney Kevin Kennedy of the Narcotics Bureau supervised the investigation.

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Please Ask These Questions Mr. Mayor and Councilmembers, “Truth Police” Plea

Hits: 124

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. December 3, 2014:

The self-styled “Truth Police,” Marie and Ron Rhodes have sent this letter to the Mayor and Common Council, pleading with them to consider these quesrtions on the resumption of the French American School of New York hearings on the controversial campus the school is planning pending approval of a special permit for construction and the approval of the partial closing  of Hathaway Lane on the site.

The hearings resume this evening at City Hall at 6 PM and will be televised on Cablevision Channel 75 (the government channel) or Verizon FIOS channel 44.

The letter:

So many FASNY Plan changes. . .resulting in so many questions. . .yet with so few answers
 
The Big Picture on FASNY. . .taking into account the City Staff comments in the recent Friday night 195 page Document Dump. . .plus all of the FASNY submissions to date. . .and the Common Council’s basic duty to protect WP residential neighborhoods from adverse impacts. . .→
 So far we have found no mitigation, by the City Staff or FASNY, that eliminates the Risk of this FASNY proposal to the Health, Safety and Welfare of WP Children, Seniors and other citizens. . .due to the influx of Traffic from FASNY’s 1,200 students and staff, FASNY’s 10-year Construction, increased Fire Response Times and the resulting negative impact of FASNY’s 53-acre massive complex on resident Property Values.  
 
The Big Picture on the Hathaway Lane Closure. . . in the most recent City Staff comments there was still no mention of any Benefits to the Public from the Closure of Hathaway Lane, a Public Street,  which has been well-maintained and supported for almost a century with tax payments by the Public.  
 Why would the City ever contemplate giving a Public Street, against the will of the Public, to a Private Developer who is not offering any Public Benefits for the Closure and who is not paying any taxes itself to support City Services?  And if FASNY ever were to come up with possible Public Benefits. . .let the Public determine if the Benefits offset all the Negatives associated with the Closure of Hathaway Lane.
Dear Mayor and Common Council,
So many FASNY Plan changes. . .resulting in so many questions. . .yet with so few answers.  Looking over all the FASNY submissions, City Staff comments and all the unanswered resident questions the Common Council and Southend neighborhoods still have. . .in our opinion FASNY needs to submit new EIS’s (Environmental Impact Statements)  for the Closure of Hathaway Lane and the North Street Entrance due to all of the Recent Site Plan changes including the number and length of new internal roadways, paved surfaces over environmentally sensitive land, more than 3 miles of impervious bike paths and the destruction of majestic old-growth trees that can’t be replaced with new saplings. . .
FASNY may even need to prepare a new FEIS when the Army Corps of Engineers involvement and requirements becomes clearer.
To date the City Staff and FASNY have identified many small individual “cosmetic” mitigations. . .i.e.
Suggesting computer traffic signals which do not reduce the number of FASNY cars and buses. . .while letting FASNY get away without disclosing to us their Total Vehicle Trips, see our #5 below.  →
Do all these small “cosmetic ” mitigations add up to even one large significant mitigation?  We say No!  As they are just a bunch of minor mitigations that in total still result in the FASNY project threatening the Health, Safety and Welfare of residents and our Southend neighborhoods.
We believe our Neighborhoods are under siege by FASNY and their supporters.  And we look forward to your Wednesday meeting (tonight, 6 PM)  for you to address the insignificance of these mitigations along with a lot of our unanswered questions.  We also have a couple of issues that are important enough for you to take a few minutes to address at Wednesday’s meeting.
 
1.  How does the Common Council decide “what is the necessary and appropriate level of protection and promotion of the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience and general welfare” as stated in WP Zoning Ordinance 4.1.2?
Do you listen to neighborhood residents, their experts’ reports and the WP Board of Education. . .or do you rely on City Department heads like the Traffic Department who think a couple of computer controlled traffic signals is enough mitigation while ignoring Board of Education Traffic concerns and never even requiring FASNY to disclose their Total Vehicle Trips?  Or do you listen to the Public Safety Department who never even mentions or addresses resident concerns about the increase in Fire Response Times from the Closure of Hathaway Lane?
We wonder. . .→  who in the City was responsible for giving each Department Head their initial instructions on what to look at and comment on with this FASNY project?  And with whatever mitigation each Department Head recommended. . .if the Department Heads were also asked to comment on how much of the FASNY project’s harm to neighborhood residents were being eliminated?
Also was each Department Head asked. . .”based on the number of years you have worked in White Plains. . .would you recommend this 53-acre FASNY project for this residential neighborhood. . .in view of the threat to the Health, Safety and Welfare of WP
citizens and the neighborhood?  We believe that Department Heads were never asked any of these questions. . .so the Common Council is miss
2. (Question Omitted by the Editor, however this controversial question was submitted in the original letter to the Mayor and Common Council and they know what it is.)
 
3.  Do some of you still think that neighborhood residents do not understand Zoning?
Our own response is maybe we do or maybe we don’t.  During this FASNY process many residents have had to read our Comprehensive Plan, Section 5.2 of Use Regulations for District R1-30 Zoning, WP Zoning Code,  Special Permit Use 6.5.1 & 6.5.3, Complete Streets Policy and other WP regulations.
From our study of these City documents. . .→  a 53-acre private school campus is not permitted by our Comprehensive Plan. . .is not eligible for a Special Permit by Section 5.2. . .or allowed by any other WP law.  Before Wednesday’s meeting. . . why don’t those Council Members who feel neighborhood residents don’t understand Zoning or feel we are not looking at the right laws. . .take a few minutes and point out the correct WP laws we should be looking at?  This way the Common Council and neighborhood residents can focus on the same regulations and understand the same Rule of Law that you all will have to follow in your voting.
4.  Are some of you trying to minimize the importance of the WP Board of Education taking a stand by rejecting FASNY’s Traffic and the North Street Entrance in order to protect WP School Children?
Isn’t the School Board, like the Common Council, elected to protect, WP citizens?  Over the past almost 4 years we’ve heard little from this Common Council about the FASNY project. . .and even less about how much you all are concerned about the Health, Welfare and Safety of WP Children, Seniors and other Citizens. . .yet Public Safety is part of your duties by law.
In our lifetime the Democratic Party has always represented themselves as the party “caring more about the people” as well as being a staunch supporter of civil rights.  →  Who then among our current Common Council, all members of the Democratic Party. . .is willing to put our own WP School Children, where minorities are the majority who walk to WP High along Bryant Avenue and North Street, at risk and in harm’s way. . .by voting to approve an exclusive and affluent private school for students that don’t even live in WP?
We can’t imagine anyone living in White Plains wanting to cause harm to our own school children. . .however we have yet to hear much from this Common Council about the potential of FASNY’s project as a threat to our own School Children and Public Safety.
5.  Our unanswered question on FASNY Traffic is still “how many Vehicle Trips will FASNY be making into our neighborhood each day in the AM and in the PM?  And what % increase will this be over our existing Traffic levels w/o FASNY”?
FASNY has not answered this question in their FEIS, SEQR Findings, Site Plan and again in their Revised Site Plan Submissions.  And we think it’s strange that this question was not addressed in the most recent City Staff comments.
We feel this is very basic Traffic information for any new proposal in the City. . .even the outside Traffic engineers TRC and Mary Manning were looking for this information. If this FASNY project. . .is the largest building development ever proposed for a WP residential neighborhood. . .→  wouldn’t the total number of Vehicle Trips FASNY will be bringing into our neighborhood each day be important?
In any case we believe on an issue as important as Traffic that. . .it is the Common Council’s responsibility to require FASNY to disclose this information. . .and also explain to residents how the infamous 530 Vehicle Trip came about and how it should be calculated to monitor FASNY.  This is basic information and common sense.
 
6.  For Wednesday’s meeting. . .why is FASNY planning on showing their own 3-D computer video that was submitted in their Revised Site Plan. . .because when we saw their 3-D. . .it made no sense to us as it showed that FASNY’s newly planted trees and our neighborhood homes looked larger than FASNY’s proposed school buildings?
According to a recent Journal News article, the City now has access to new digital 3-D modeling technology that could help the Common Council and residents visually understand how FASNY’s 53-acre building proposal negatively impacts our residential neighborhood.  And at the last FASNY review meeting weren’t Common Council members asking FASNY for this digital 3-D modeling technology rather than whatever the video FASNY came up with is called.  And lawyer David Steinmetz in his Zoning article that we recently sent you believes, as we do, that aerial views help in judging how a proposed development fits with the Character of a neighborhood.  And we wonder how in the 3-D modeling FASNY’s destruction of numerous 100-year old plus trees with new plantings is presented?
Each time FASNY changes its Plan. . .the FASNY Representatives like to take up time at next Common Council meeting making updated presentations. . .in part to mislead and misstate facts that we already know, have read or don’t need to know. . .because whenever these FASNY Representing are talking. . .they are delaying and preventing any incisive questions and probing by the Common Council.  This leads to. . . so many FASNY Plan changes. . .resulting in so many questions. . .yet with so few answers.
 
Final Thought. . . →  If the mitigation recommended by the City Staff and FASNY doesn’t protect our residential neighborhood and doesn’t eliminate the risks to the Health, Safety and Welfare of our own School Children, Seniors and other Citizens. . .what does all their mitigation accomplish?  We would say very little. . .as all these their mitigation attempts seem like “moving the deck chairs around on the Titanic”. . .while not focusing on the Big Picture potential disaster. . .for our Neighborhood, School Children and Seniors the disaster if FASNY is approved. 
Thanks in advance for addressing these issues and asking FASNY challenging questions,
We report. . .you decide.
Your Truth Police, Team Rhodes
Marie and Ron Rhodes
P.S.  In the too ridiculous to believe category. . .→  in the Revised Site Plan do we understand correctly. . .that a Private Developer, FASNY, put forward a proposal that the Public. . .each day should go the FASNY website to see if FASNY will be opening the City’s own Street, Hathaway Lane, for the Public to use that day. . .a Street we ourselves use each day?
 
Demands like this occur when an outside developer believes they can take advantage of and steamroll government officials. 
Posted in Uncategorized

Enough is Enough. City Should Demand a Real 3-D Model of the FASNY Project.

Hits: 135

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. December 3, 2014:

Prior to the resumption of the French American School of New York dual hearings on the proposed campus site plan and request for closure of Hathaway Lane where it bisects the former Ridgeway property, a reader sent this letter to the Mayor and Common Council members:

Dear Mayor Roach and Council Members:

Several thoughts and things to consider in your questions to the applicant of the largest development project in a residential neighborhood in the history of White Plains.  FASNY .

No where in the latest FASNY documents is a perimeter fence mentioned or depicted.  Very simply, is FASNY going to have a fence surrounding its 56 acre campus?  If so, what kind of fence and where will it be located?  The Council must demand answers to these questions.  I suspect that fortress FASNY will be ‘safely’ demarcated from the City of White Plains.

Also, the submitted ‘3-D model’ was a joke.  It was not in anyway helpful in visualizing the enormity of the over 260,000 sq ft school buildings/campus and the visual impact to the surrounding Gedney Farms neighborhood.  Yet again, FASNY responded to your request and produced a pitiful, useless piece of nonsense.  You must demand a 3-D rendition with CAD computer aided-design of the proposed FASNY site so that all stakeholders would know what FASNY in White Plains would really look like.  The picture below is an example of a 3-D CAD of New York City.

In addition, according to experienced landscape professionals, FASNY’s meadow restoration project is ‘not natural’.  The habitat of Westchester is woodland not meadow as shown in the pretty FASNY aspirational depictions.

All of the evidence presented to you over the past four years against this project is overwhelming.  Please carefully consider it. As elected stewards of the city, do the right thing for the future of the entire city of White Plains and vote no to the closure of Hathaway Lane and no to the FASNY special permit. Reasonable people will suspect that undue influence was exerted on Council members if any other decision is reached.

I do not believe that FASNY is a done deal.  To date, 1,618 viewers of the “FASNY: It’s Not a Done Deal” Youtube video agree. http://m.youtube.com/watch/v=809tyjLvs68   It might be worth while to re-view the bucolic jewel of a neighborhood that is depicted in this 3min14sec video.  You can save Gedney Farms. You have been more than fair with FASNY throughout this SEQRA ordeal and followed the procedures to the letter of the law.

 

Abandonment of Hathaway Lane!
Enough is enough.
Thank you,
Anne M. Casey, M.D.
Posted in Uncategorized

Historical Society on The Civil War: What was General William Tecumsah Sherman Really Like?

Hits: 152

 

The Daniel E. Sickles Civil War Roundtable

In association with

The White Plains Historical Society

Presents:

The American Civil War

A program series – open to the Public

 

Sherman’s Demons

 

with Founding Member of the Civil War Forum of Metropolitan New York
Jim Santagata

December 3, 2014

Most Civil War enthusiasts know all about Sherman’s military accomplishments, but relatively few realize the myriad of personal demons he had to conquer and the depths from which he had to climb before he finally achieved military success. Sherman’s early life was filled with doubts and fears, failures and frustrations.

As he re-entered the army after the war had begun he was so certain he was not at all qualified to lead an army that he actually obtained, from none other than President Lincoln, a promise that he would never be trusted with an independent command! It wasn’t long before that promise was broken, and the nation’s newspapers were soon shouting that Sherman was insane!

So who was the real Sherman? In this talk Jim will examine the complex personality of this charismatic yet controversial general, and interpret Sherman’s life as a series of struggles for the order he so desperately craved in his life. And although he eventually conquered every one of the demons of his earlier life, it was an old familiar acquaintance that emerged, many years after the war had ended, as the one demon he could not conquer.

Jim Santagata

 

Jim is a 69 year resident of Brooklyn NY, and an Engineering graduate of the Cooper Union, where Lincoln’s famous speech in February 1860 is said to have won him the Presidency. He is a retired engineer from the food industry, where he spent his final and his favorite years working in the pasta industry. He now has plenty of time to enjoy his Civil War interests, his cycling and his life and travels with his wife Matti, although not necessarily in that order. They now split their retirement between their home in Brooklyn and their condo on Siesta Beach in Sarasota FL.

 

Jim was one of the founding members of the Civil War Forum of Metropolitan NY in 2009 after the group split from the CW Roundtable of NY. He has been the group’s Secretary since its founding, and is now the only one of the original officers who has held his original position for the organization’s entire existence. 

 

Programs are held at The Purdy House: 60 Park Ave. ♦ White Plains, NY 10603 at 7:30 pm

For further information, please contact: (914) 949-4679 • Program@CivilWarNY150.org

Posted in Uncategorized