Commish Updates City on Ferris Avenue Shooting. Foot Patrols Added on Ferris

WPCNR POLICE GAZETTE. E- NEWS CONFERENCE with Deputy Commissioner Daniel Jackson. September 19, 2006: Deputy Commissioner Daniel Jackson of the White Plains Department of Public Safety updated WPCNR on the progress of the police investigation into the shooting on Ferris Avenue one week ago, where a White Plains man was chased to the corner of Richards Street and Ferris Avenue and shot in the stomach, and left in the street at 1:15 P.M. The Commissioner also addressed the ongoing Downtown City Center patrols.


 



 


Deputy Commissioner Daniel Jackson briefed WPCNR on the status of the Police hunt for the shooter (s) of a White Plains man on Ferris Avenue one week ago Monday. Commissioner Jackson responded to these WPCNR questions this afternoon: Photo, WPCNR News


 


 



 


WPCNR: Are you still not at liberty to reveal the name of the shooting
victim?


Commissioner Jackson: The victim is Louigy D’Haiti of White Plains, a Ferris Avenue resident.

WPCNR: Is the victim refusing to identify who shot him?


Commissioner Jackson: That is a detail of the investigation that we cannot discuss.

WPCNR: Are you investigating this a gang-related incident?


Commissioner Jackson: It does not appear to be gang related at this time.

WPCNR: What was the cause of the altercation?


Commissioner Jackson: Another part of the investigation.

WPCNR: Is the victim under police guard? 


Commissioner Jackson: Not at this time. 

WPCNR:  Are there any suspects at this time (even though you have not
arrested   anyone)?


Commissioner Jackson: We have suspects that we are concentrating on. 

WPCNR:  Is the Police Department increasing security in the Ferris Avenue
area   during the day? Or any other times?


Commissioner Jackson: Yes, we have added a two person foot patrol in the area at various
times of the day to address issues that have come up.

WPCNR: Ancillary questions on the City Center/downtown area:

WPCNR: Have the police settled upon a strategy that works for the downtown
City Center area?


Commissioner Jackson: We believe that our strategy in the downtown area has been working all along and the crime data supports that. However, we are always adjusting our deployment to meet any number of factors; crime trends, events, weather, public perception, etc. 

WPCNR:  Have the police increased personnel patrolling evenings in the City  Center/Renaissance Fountain area? Could you describe in a sketchy way without   compromising your patrol strategy?


Commissioner Jackson: As you have observed, we have made adjustments to our deployment in
the downtown area to address some of the issues that have been raised. We meet with the BID, neighborhood groups, tavern owners, individuals, etc. on a regular basis and hope that people would contact the Mayor’s office (422-1411) and us (422-6111) to address any concerns that they may have at any time.  We constantly evaluate and adjust our operation to address the changing dynamic of the city, will continue to do so, and welcome concerns of residents, business owners and visitors.


WPCNR: Thank you, Commissioner.

Posted in Uncategorized

The Bond Road Show: Connors Talks the Capital Project Referendum.




WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. September 19, 2006:  Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors addressed Mamaroneck Avenue School PTA-ers Tuesday evening in front of about 35 to 40 parents discussing the School Capital Improvement Project. Last week he conducted a similar pep rally at Post Road School. Connors also said that Fred Seiler, the new Assistant Superintendent for Business had begun his assignment with the district Monday replacing Terrance Schreurs, and that Mr. Schreurs’ last day was September 15.


 



 


Last week, Mr. Connors and Mr. Schreurs presented to the Post Road School PTA with very positive feedback from the crowd of over 50 parents in attendance last week. He is speaking on the need to pass the $69.6 Million Capital Project Referendum October 17. Photo, WPCNR News


 



Before the start of Mr. Connors’ Post Road School appearance one week ago, WPCNR interviewed Post Road Principal Laura Havis on why Post Road School needed to be replaced. She  explained that the Post Road School was close to 100 years old, and there was general agreement that “something had to be done.” She told me the district was forced to continually repair the school, there were continuing problems with the heating and air conditioning systems, that the size of the school classrooms did not meet state standards, that the school was not accessible to the handicapped, and that it flooded on the below street level perpetually during heavy rains.


 


 She also reminded WPCNR that the School District Capital Project Committee had “seen the school for themselves” and agreed the school needed replacing. Asked if parents had complained to her about the condition of the school, Principal Havens said, “Nobody has complained to me (about the condition of the school).”


 



Laura Havis, left, Bill Pollak, Acting President of the Board of Education, and Superintendt of Schools Timothy Connors talking about the Capital Project Referendum coming up on October 17 at Post Road School one week ago. Photo by WPCNR News


 


Superintendent Connors kicked off the meeting, telling the Post Road parents, “We need your help,” and went on to explain that the district would be taking “more time with faculty and staff” to finetune the interior design of the new Post Road School configuration. He said, “We have an estimate from our architect (Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson) in terms of what we think it will cost (to build — $38.7 Million), then once we do that we then design the school. Many of you want a say as to what that school will look like. We will form a committee to give you input.”


 


Connors said it will take two years to build the new Post Road School. He stressed that the new school was not going to happen, “if you don’t get out to vote (October 17). Then we’ll share with you what the concept is. Join us in selling this referendum to the community.”


 


The Superintendent of Schools said approval of the referendum will benefit Kindergarten through third grade grades (by increasing capacity at Post Road),  and “improve education for all of our children.” He promised an October 3 “Open House” at Post Road School in order to show the community the present state of the Post Road facility.


 


Connors noted that the Capital Project Committee formed by the Board of Education had toured Post Road School on a Saturday and by their observations , “they agreed we need to replace this school.”


 


On the Mamaroneck Avenue School renovation (estimated to cost $4.6 Million), he said, “They need additions to the core facility, and a new library.”


 


He placed the cost of the total Capital Project at $69,635,000, which will be partially defrayed by $2 Million in aid from the state and $1 Million from the Louis Cappelli Foundation, leaving the district to borrow for $66.6 Million.


 


Connors said the infrastructure improvements to all the schools (costing $16 Million) would pay for new boilers, roofs, windows, lights, new core investment. He noted that the other elementary schools, with exception of Ridgeway and Church Street School and the middle schools and high school were more than fifty years old and upgrades were needed. He hammered home the point that “all children will benefit.”


 


On the subject of the fields, Parker Stadium and Loucks Field, which are scheduled to be upgraded with synthetic turf, new metal bleachers, and press boxes and locker rooms, (at a cost of $9.6 Million), Connors said the synthetic turf would enable soccer, lacrosse, field hockey and football to be played with more games, more often, as many as four to five games a day, as well as providing more practice time than the present grass fields for a host of teams, as well as community recreation teams.


 


Connors described the field projects as “the right thing to do for the district and the city. ”


 


The cost of the capital project, Terrance Schreurs said was a 1% increase in the tax rate, little more than $4 plus per thousand dollars of assessed value.


 


Schreurs said for every year the district delays, it adds $2 Million to the cost of the project. Schreurs said that Triton Construction, the Project Manager, estimated that construction costs are rising at the rate of 8% a year.  “The time is right,” Connors added. “The best thing you can do is commit yourself to getting out the vote.”


 


During the Question and Answer period, Connors said that by building the Post Road School, and the improvements to Mamaroneck Avenue School, the district would be able keep its present class size ratio while accommodating the projected school enrollment growth of 280 more students in the elementary K-5 level. If the referendum is defeated, class size would go up, he said.


 


In response to questions, he pointed out that to renovate the present building would not only cost 78% of  the cost of building a new structure ($29 Million to $38.7 Million), but the district might have to lease space to accommodate students while renovating the Post Road structure. “It’s (the present Post Road School) not worth the investment (to renovate),” Connors said. “Cost of acquiring another site,” Connors said, “would be a million dollars an acre. The present Post Road site is the best option in terms of site and cost effectiveness.”


 


Connors appealed to the Post Road parents in attendance, to think of “What we can do to try and sell our cast to the people, that there’s something in here for everyone in the community that’s going to enrich that community.”


 


In response to a question, Connors said that the new Post Road School would pick up one class per grade (5 classes at  20 pupils each) to increase its capacity to 600 students, putting it on a level with the other four elementary schools. (As of  September 1, 2006, Post Road serves 493 students, Church Street School 626, Mamaroneck Avenue School, 605, Ridgeway School, 646, and George Washington School, 654.)


 


Bill Pollak, acting President of the Board of Education, in attendance  suggested to the parents, “How do you sell this? All people who own real estate will really benefit. If we don’t do it (vote for the referendum) for the right reasons  maybe they will do it for that reason.”


 


Connors noted to the crowd, “You have tohelp us make sure there’s a legacy for future generations.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Anne Reasoner, former City Budget Director Appointed County Budget Director

WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. From Westchester County Department of Communications. (EDITED)September 19, 2006 UPDATED 4:30 P.M. E.D.T.:  Anne Reasoner, previously Budget Director for the City of White Plains until June 13, when she departed the city under unexplained circumstances has been appointed Budget Director for the County of Westchester effective in January, according to a news release from the Westchester County Department of Communications.


 



 


Anne Reasoner. New Westchester County Budget Director. On the Money.


Photo, WPCNR News Archive.


According to the Westchester Department of Communications, Ms. Reasoner will begin  her assignment with the County October 2, at a salary of $133,235, then will step up to Budget Director in January to a salary of $150,725, more than is paid any official of the City of White Plains, except for the Commissioner of Public Works and the Commissioner of Public Safety.  In her White Plains Budget Director position, (since eliminated),  when Mrs. Reasoner departed in early June, she was earning $130,396. The official release states:




ANNE REASONER MOVES ON UP TO COUNTY BUDGET DIRECTOR: The former Budget Director for the Town of Greenwich, Stamford and White Plains, who abruptly departed White Plains in the first week in June with no official explanation from the Mayor’s Office, and her Budget Department “consolidated” under Commissioner of Finance, Gina Cuneo-Harwood, has landed perhaps the most prestigious budgeting position in the area. She is shown (looking at camera), presiding over a Budget and Finance Committee meeting in The Mayor’s Conference Room in April, 2005.  Photo, WPCNR News Archive

 


County Executive Andy Spano announced today the appointment of Anne Reasoner as the County’s new Budget Director, replacing Kathleen Carrano who announced several months ago that she would retire at the beginning of next year.


 Reasoner was chosen after an exhaustive search and selection process that began this past summer. She will began her transition into the position Oct. 2 and take over after Carrano retires early next year.


“We had wonderful, experienced candidates, and it was a difficult choice, but Anne’s knowledge, integrity and budget experience made her the right person for this job,” Spano said.


He added, “The Director of the Budget Office is a vital position both to the county government and to our taxpayers. We have a triple- A bond rating in Westchester because of the way we manage things. I am sure that with Anne, this sense of fiscal responsibility and accountability to the taxpayers will continue. It was also important, after the good relationship that Katie has had with the Board of Legislators, that I hire a professional whose knowledge of government budgets would bring a comfort level to the Legislators. Anne brings that,” Spano said.


Reasoner will work with Carrano on the 2007 budget, which will be released Nov. 15 .She will take over  effective Jan. 13, 2007.


Reasoner’s career in the budget arena began as a budget analyst at Metro-North over 20 years ago. Since then, she has held the positions of budget director for the Town of Greenwich for 13 years, deputy comptroller for the City of Stamford and most recently budget director for the City of White Plains.


 


She said she was looking forward to joining the Spano administration and following in the footsteps of Carrano. “Westchester County has a great reputation, and that certainly includes how well the Budget Office has functioned under Katie Carrano. Working for County Executive Andy Spano and with the Board of Legislators will be a great opportunity for me in light of all they have done and continue to do for the people of Westchester.”


Reasoner said that working on the 2007 budget and getting to know her staff were her first priorities. “I have worked with the county Budget Office in the past and have always found them very helpful. The work ethic they project is one that I believe I live my life by.”


Spano also announced that Reasoner will be instrumental as he seeks a replacement for Deputy Budget Director Leslie Bennett, who will also retire in January.

Posted in Uncategorized

Former Board member Grills BOE for Wrist-slap Conduct Pledge.

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey September 18, 2006: Former School Board member Sarina Russell addressed the Board of Education last Monday evening and drew attention to the Board very quietly softening the standards of the School District Athletic and Co-Currcular Pledge.


 



Sarina Russell Criticises the Board of Education for watering down the District Co-Curricular Pledge, Monday evening, September 11. Photo, WPCNR News.


 


In light of the arrest of a Horace Greeley Cross Country Star last week, being allowed to compete in a Cross Country match Saturday (and finishing second) after being arrested and charged with unlawfully dealing with a child (a teenager at the runner’s drinking party was hospitalized with alcohol poisoning), Ms. Russell’s remarks were precognizant.


 


The new White Plains pledge that athletes and participants in WPHS sports and extra-curricular activities is significant in what it now says will happen to students caught drinking underage, drugging, or breaking laws.


 


In 2005-2006, the code read: “Upon initial disclosure (Editor’s Note: not on conviction) the resulting action can be automatic suspension from participation for a period of time to be determined by White Plains High School Administration or the Superintendent of Schools.” B. A second offense can result in automatic suspension from participation for a period of one calendar year form the date of violation. C. a third offense can result in permanent suspension from all co-curricular participation..


 


Note: These standards of behavior are in effect both in and out of school, 24 hours/day.


 


A Quiet Change


 


 


This spring this code was under consideration by the district and original writings were attempting to make it tougher and spell out circumstances of punishment. However, over the summer, it was changed (in discussion with parents, coaches, administrators, stakeholders) to only include offenses committed while participating in school team or school group-sponsored activities, or committed on school grounds,  giving the appearance of allowing students to go undisciplined for infractions like underage drinking, drug consumption that they commit on their own time. (Apparently, the Horace Greeley School District approach is being adapted.)


 


(WPCNR is not aware of when or how this was adapted, since the last time it was being discussed was in June, and it was not promulgated to the general public for comment to this reporter’s knowledge.)


 


Off Campus Behavior Not School Related Not covered.


No Automatic Suspension.


 


The new Pledge is a departure from the 2005-2006 code and would appear that WPHS students will not be considered for punishment for doing drugs, drinking underage, fighting and violent behavior as long as it is not committed on school grounds, or on school trips. A student involved in a criminal investigation for an offense in the community however will be subject to a school review and possible penalty. What constitutes a criminal investigation is not defined, such as does the investigation have to result in actual arrest and charges filed on the misbehaving student.


 


The new code eliminates the “automatic suspension” punishment regardless of conviction, and appears to expand the period of time between offense and when discipline will be administered, while setting a series of softer “punishments.” The pledge in the 2006-2007 Parent Information Handbook dealing with consequences reads:


 


“I also understand that any violation of this pledge found after a proper investigation by school authorities will result in disciplinary action, including a warning, probation, a specified period of suspension and/or permanent suspension from the athletic and/or co-curricular activity. Also, I further understand that this process applies to a student who is the subject of a criminal investigation whether in school or in the community.”


 


The automatic suspension punishment for students committing such offenses outside of school trips and team activities,  has been replaced with a mandatory referral to a district counselor for the offending student(s):


 


“I understand that I am expected to conduct myself both in school and in the community in a manner which demonstrates personal integrity and positive reflects on me and the  District. If I am involved in an incident in the community which involves drug, alcohol or violent behavior, I understand I will be referred to a district counselor.”


 


Accountability Softened.


 


Judging from the way the pledge reads now, the fate of a White Plains athlete, a member of a school civic club who held a drinking party (as the Horace Greeley  Cross Country student did last week),  and was caught would suffer no penalty, and not even be investigated by the school district.


 


Perhaps referral to a counselor will be made, however the pledge does not say it is  mandatory for the student recommended to a District counselor to see the counselor.


 


 


The new White Plains pledge does not spell out the grounds for suspension, and even states that the offending student may be given, in this order, a warning, probation, suspension. This appears to indicate the students misbehaving on school grounds, trips and school-related functions face little to worry about. Nowhere does it say in the pledge that the student offense will be put on the student’s permanent record.


 


Russell Raps the Board’s Knuckles.


 


Addressing the Board of Education last Monday night, Ms. Russell, a former BOE member, was appalled about the ambiguity of the new document and that it appears to say the district will only discipline students who violate the conditions of the pledge on school grounds, events or trips.


 


She told the Board of Education in certain terms: “It doesn’t do the job,” she said. “ It’s a cover your backside document not meant to be a punishment for children who do things they’re not supposed to do. It doesn’t send the right message. This document does not make me proud and I am angry that I have to sign something I don’t believe in.”


 


The Board of Education did not comment.


 


Reading the two pledges together, it appears the White Plains City School District is taking the Horace Greeley School District approach to student drinking parties and other offenses as long as it does not happen where the school district is in charge.


 


In the last three years, White Plains athletes and students found drinking on student trips and off-campus have received brief suspensions from participation, but have been allowed to remain on teams and in their activities, completing their seasons. Punishments for the offending students were hard to find out about except by “word of mouth.” 


 


The school district settled a multi-million damage suit stemming from a Highlands attack on a student. The amount was not disclosed by the plaintiff’s lawyer,  LeRoy Wilson, Jr.  who confirmed the settlement to WPCNR. The School District attempted to cover up the assault of the male student by other students on the Highlands campus, and did not report it to the police. The resulting law suit brought by the parent of the victim for not being informed of what had happened was settled.


 


Meanwhile Up in Chappaqua


 


The Horace Greeley School District has not disciplined the football team members allegedly involved in the party in Chappaqua hosted by the charged Cross Country runner. Media reports indicate the football team members at the Cross Country star’s party will not be suspended either.


 


It is interesting to note that the Horace Greeley student who hostessed the drinking party and was charged with unlawfully dealing with a child, told reporters after her Cross Country match the Saturday following the party, that “everything’s been blown out of proportion.”


 


Reading the two pledges together, it appears the White Plains City School District is taking the Horace Greeley School District approach to student drinking parties and other offenses as long as it does not happen where the school district is in charge.


 


The two Co-Curricular documents follow in their entirety:


 


2005-2006 Student Code of Conduct Participation in Co-Curricular and Athletic Programs:


 


As a candidate for participation in co-curricular programs at White Plains High School, it is our hope that you will take advantage of the school’s numerous opportunities. It is very important that the student and parents/guardians read and understand the essential policies involved relative to participation. We view it as an honor and a privilege to represent White Plains High School as a member of a school sports team or student activity and thus, by accepting this honor, the student must accept the responsibilities that accompany it. These regulations have been established for the benefit of those who participate as representatives of our school in a variety of teams and clubs.


 


Each member must do the following to maintain eligibility to participate in co-curricular activities:



  1. Abide by the rules and regulation as specified by the District, the school and for athletes, the New York State Public High Schools Athletic Association.
  2. Abide by all club activity rules as specified by the club advisor and the Student Activities Coordinator, and for athletes, all team and training rules as specified by the coach and Athletic Director.
  3. Comply with academic eligibility requirements as established by White Plains High School
  4. Demonstrate good citizenship and appropriate behavior at all times as a representative of the school and community.
  5. Use transportation provided by the school traveling to and from all events. (Exception: advanced Transportation Release Form is available in Student Activities or Athletic Office.

 


 


The following actions will be taken when a student is found in possession of controlled substances, weapons, or is using or selling tobacco (excluding non-athletes), alcohol (except as part of a religious ceremony), marijuana, concaine, steroids, or any other controlled substance:


 



  1. Upon initial disclosure, the resulting action can be automatic suspension from participation for a period of time to be determined by White Plains High School Administration.
  2. A second offense can result in automatic suspension from participation for a period of one calendar year from the date of violation.
  3. A third offense can result in permanent suspension from all co-curricular participation.

 


NOTE: These standards of behavior are in effect both in and out of school, including 24 hours/day.


Due process review shall be afforded to all students, and an investigation of circumstances will be completed in a timely fashion. ANY VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS WILL RESULT IN APPROPRIATE ACTION TAKEN BY THE PRINCIPAL, THE ATHLETIC DIRECTOR, THE STUDENT ACTIVITIES COORDINATOR AND ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGNEE DEPENDING ON THE SERIOUS NESS OF THE SITUATION AND THE FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION THE ADMINSTRATION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO EXCEED OR REDUCE THE EXTENT OF THE DISCIPLINARY ACTION TO BE TAKEN.


 


(Parent and athlete are expected and required to sign and return the pledge)


 


The 2006-2007 ATHLETIC AND CO-CURRICULAR PLEDGE


 


The athletic and co-curricular activities at the Middle School and High School are integral parts of the overall educational program of the White Plains City School District. Participation in these activities is a privilege granted to students who maintain scholarship and citizenship within the rules and regulations of the District. The  District believes that it is imperative that parents and the school district work together to set high expectations for student behavior both on and off campus.


 


The District expects that I will uphold the high standards of academic eligibility and abide by the rules specified by my coach/advisor. As a participant in an athletic and/or co-curricular activity, I will comply with all the provisions of the District’s Code of Conduct, and I pledge as follows:


 




    • I will not possess, consume, be under the influence of, and/or distribute alcohol, tobacco and/or unlawful drugs, such as marijuana, cocaine or other controlled substances on school grounds or at school-sponsored events and trips.
    • I will not engage in hazing, harassment, fighting, theft, vandalism or violent conduct on school grounds or at school-sponsored events and trips.
    • I will not possess, consume and/or distribute performance-enhancing drugs or steroids at any time.

 


I also understand that any violation of this pledge found after a proper investigation by school authorities will result in disciplinary action, including a warning, probation, a specified period of suspension and/or permanent suspension from the athletic and/or co-curricular activity. Also, I further understand that this process applies to a student who is the subject of a criminal investigation whether in school or in the community.


 


I understand that I am expected to conduct myself both in school and in the community in a manner which demonstrates personal integrity and positively reflects on me and the District. If I am involved in an incident in the community which involves drug, alcohol or violent behavior, I understand I will be referred to a district counselor.


 


I have read the above and accept responsibility for my actions under this pledge


 


(Parent and student are expected to sign the pledge)

Posted in Uncategorized