$69.6 M Referendum Passes by 106 Votes.

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. October 17, 2006: White Plains voters apparently have approved an $69.6 Million referendum (the richest one-time investment ever considered by the school district or the city),  to upgrade school infrastructures, build a new Post Road School, make additions to Mamaroneck Avenue School, and create two artifical turf stadiums at Parker Stadium and Loucks Field today.



Voting at Ridgeway School Tuesday. 3 P.M. Photo, WPCNR News


The vote was 1,032 for and 926 against, including absentee ballots. Affidavit ballots which number less than the 106 votes winning margin remain to be counted. The Board of Education will meet Wednesday evening to ratify the result.


Five out of six School Districts carried the Referendum.


                                                                         The Unofficial Canvas:


Fire Station :           62 YES, 88 NO


Church Street School      174 YES, 162 NO


Rochambeau:                 107 YES, 59 NO


Highlands:                        280 YES, 226 NO


Mamaroneck Avenue:     51 YES 46 NO


Ridgeway School:            358 YES, 345 NO


        TOTAL:       1,032 YES   926 NO

Posted in Uncategorized

Photograph of the Day: Good Old Purdy’s — Mr. Autumn

WPCNR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE DAY. By the WPCNR Roving Photographer. October 17, 2006: It’s autumn in Westchester County, and just over on King Street in Greenwich, Connecticut is the original farmer’s market: Purdy’s Farm, where Del Zanette has presided over the area’s best apples and cider, and vegetables  for 41 years. Purdy’s Farm itself has been on the site for 90 years, Del says.


The CitizeNetReporter has been visiting Purdy’s since I was 5, now 45 years later…like Playland Purdy’s is still here.




Mr. Autumn: Del Zanette  at his Westchester-Connecticut tradition: Purdy’s Farm on King Street just a mashi shot from Westchester County Airport. Mr. Purdy, one of the area’s working farmers grows his vegetables, tomatoes, egg plant, squash and other organic delights on his two acres in Greenwich horse country. He offers the tasty  crispy, semi-sweet McCoon’s apples now in season, plus Cortland, Delicious, Golden Delicious, Galas and other unique apple choices grown at  Glory Farm in Marlboro, New York. He still supervises the making of his apple cider at a friend’s farm upstate, delivering a full-bodied and mellow old fashioned apple cider.  Currently he is planting Rye wheat on his acreage, which he plows over and it serves as fertilizer for next year’s crop.  It would not be autumn in Westchester County without Del Purdy and his stand. Photo by the WPCNR Roving Photographer

Posted in Uncategorized

WP Voters Decide $69.6 Million School Referendum — Richest Ever – 12 to 9 Today

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. October 17, 2006: Registered voters are called upon to decide whether they will choose to authorize spending $69.6 Million (White Plains biggest lump sum school district expenditure in history)  to build a new Post Road School on the Little League Fields between Sterling and Soundview Avenues over the next two years (for $38.7 Million), expand the library, add windows to the cafeteria, and put a three-story addition on Mamaroneck Avenue School for $4.6 Million; execute $17 Million of “infrastructure” repairs on the balance of district buildings, and install two synthetic turf athletic stadiums at Loucks Field and Parker Stadium for a cost of $9.4 Million.


 



 


School Referendum Polling Stations are located in the Battle Hill Fire Station # 5 (District 1), Church Street School (District 2), Rochambeau School (District 3), Highlands School (District 4), Mamaroneck Avenue School (district 5), and Ridgeway School (District 6). Photo, WPCNR News


 


The rationale promoted by the District for the expenditures is to prepare the district for an expected increased enrollment of 280 students by 2010 and keep White Plains school buildings up to standards and preserve them. Meanwhile, the strategic planning consultant, it was reported last night at the Board of Education meeting will begin talking with leaders of the community about long-term priorities for the district’s long-term planning beginning October 24.


 



 The Post Road School, on the other hand,  which has been in service since 1914, has been determined by the architectural firm of Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson to be obsolete and too expensive to renovate and expand, and has been recommended to be replaced with a new school on the same site. This is a procedure that KG & D recommended to the Pleasantville School District in replacing the Bedford Road School. 


 


However, citizens attending the tour of Post Road School Saturday morning learned from the Administrator of Buildings and Facilities for the district, that the conditions of flooding, ostensibly one of the key reasons Post Road School is deemed unsalvageable has existed for more than 15 years, and is blamed on overflowing city storm drains. (No comment yet from White Plains Commissioner of Public Works Joseph Nicoletti on the storm drain situation on those streets.)  


 


At a cost of $29 Million to renovate Post Road School, it was decided by a citywide committee and recommended to the Board of Education that a new school be built on the site at a cost of $38.7 Million. The option not explored was building a new library, auditorium and classroom wing on the site for less money while expanding classrooms in the old building.


 


Since flooding problems can be eliminated by drainage systems below ground level, this option should have been explored years ago, but was not. The question arises, if this flooding has existed for years, why did not the school district make a concentrated effort to eliminate it years ago, why is it a sudden problem now?  Why have Post Road parents chosen Post Road – if it is so overcrowded and too small and such a slum?


 


In the matter of the infrastructure expenditure of approximately $17 Million, no second opinion on these infrastructure matters was sought. It is the architect’s recommendation that the school district is going on. However, the infrastructure improvements are not mandated by the state to be executed — it is a school district option. The infrastructure improvements  could be executed without  bonding on a once a year basis over the next five years at even with inflation  $3.5 Million a year (an approximate 3-4% increase in property taxes a year)  instead of bonded for with the added cost of debt service.


 


Mamaroneck Avenue School


 


The Mamaroneck Avenue School addition program of a three story wing to provide a new library, provide music and small group instruction rooms and place kindergarten all on one level, while improving the cafeteria (providing windows) and auditorium is being executed as an improvement to that school.


 


The Stadiums


 


On the matter of the athletic stadiums, the $9.4 Million consists of a lot more than just synthetic turf. It includes demolition of the Parker Stadium bowl, and replacement of the the old concrete bowl with metal bleachers and press box and seeding the hill, installing a walking track and synthetic turf.


 


The district rationale for this started out as a money-saving measure over maintenance of grass fields at Parker and Loucks Stadiums. There is also, they said, the added benefit of providing heavier use of fields for expansion of the school athletic programs and community recreation programs, with the prestige perk of attracting national events to Parker Stadium by expanding seating capacity with new metal bleachers, press box 10-lane track and lights are added.  


 


This latter enhancement of turning Loucks Field into a showplace has long been quietly pushed by athletic booster groups who have not been able to generate more than $200,000 in community donations towards it in 7 years of  fund-raising efforts. The community and corporate White Plains have not shown support for it. It is something that the school district feels would be “nice” to have.


 


WPCNR has heard excellent reviews on the state-of-the-art turf planned to be installed at Parker and Loucks Stadiums. It is soft, allows players to make true cuts on an even surface and is yielding as opposed to the hard-as-a-rock surface of first generation synthetic turf fields. The drawback according to Brad Fresenburg, a Missouri University  extension specialist is that synthetic turf generates temperatures twice as high as grass.  In The Columbia (Missouri) Daily Tribune reports Fresenburg as saying on a 98 degree day, surface temperatures on an in-filled field “top 170 degrees, compared to 105 degrees for natural grass.”  Fresenburg found that a firmly planted cleat in “in-filled” turf was harder to “twist free” of the surface, that he thought could lead to sprains. But, he found, “partially planted” cleats the resistance was similar to grass.


 


In the same Columbia Daily Tribune article, by Megan Means,  Michael Meyers of the Human Performance Research Center at West Texas A & M University, having conducted a long-term study on “in-filled” turf finds in-filled turf produced “more muscle injuries, injuries on hot days and noncontact injuries on artificial surfaces, while grass fields had more knee and ligament injuries, head trauma and injuries that cost playing time.”


 


The in-filled fields have to be disinfected from time-to-time because in-filled turf does not absorb and decompose bodily fluids, writes reporter Means.


 


The main question voters need to consider is how many more games and practices will the new fields accommodate. There are only 3 to 4 home football games a year for the varsity football team. There are of course other games played by the Junior Varsity and “feeder football” programs, lacrosse and field hockey as well as varsity boys and women’s soccer and community soccer.


 


Breaks Even on principle only after 18 years, Discounting Debt Service.


 


At a $9.4 Million expenditure next year with a field  life of 12 years before the synthetic turfs have to be replaced, you have a cost of approximately $800,000 a year ($9.4 Million) With the cost of maintaining two grass fields placed at over $500,000 for 12 years, it will take the district 18 years to get their money back on the principle alone, not to mention the debt service.  If you have to replace the fields in 8 years, you will be out, say $2 Million more after 8 eight years pushing the cost of break-even out to 22 years (2028).


 


Another way of looking at it is at $800,000 a year for the cost of the two stadiums, if you have 500 practices and games on the two synthetic fields over a year it is costing the district $1,600 a game or practice for that synthetic turf field. But, of course you are expanding your athletic venue usage.  No figures have been given as to how much more usage is expected per synthetic field. No revenue projections from rentals have been projected. 


 


( In contrast, Michael Lynch, Administrator of Buildings and Facilities for the district estimated the cost of maintaining Parker and Loucks Stadiums as grass fields to be $11,480 a year each. Double that and you get a cost of $22,960 a year to maintain those grass fields. Multiply that $22, 960  by 12 years, and you get $275,520 to keep the Parker and Loucks Stadiums grass, but of course you lose the multiple usage the artificial turf gives you.


 


Mr. Lynch also said he would recrown and resod the grass fields once in the next 12 years for a cost of $44,000 for both grass field crowns, bringing the total estimated expenditure for maintaining two grass fields at Parker and Loucks as $320,000. Add say 60% inflation over 12 years and the cost comes to approximately $512,000 over 12 years as opposed to a $9.4 Million expenditure to build new stadia with artificial turf at Loucks and Parker, to increase usage of fields. If inflation is less, then maybe the stadium projects earn your money back in 16 years not 18.)


 


 


But if the voters feel these state-of-art facilities are prestigious and useful to the district and the city, now is the day to bring them to White Plains.



 


Mr. and Mrs. White Plains Deep Pockets.



 


The cost per year in new taxes for the $66 Million bond issue (over 25 years)  in addition to the ongoing automatic school budget increase of 8% is $66 next year, $64 in 2008-2009 and $71 in 2009-2010, with the cost of principle and debt service promised by the district to decline beyond 2010. How much it will decline has not been made public.

Posted in Uncategorized

State of the Art Turf Installation Cost James Madison University Under $1 M

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. October 12, 2006 UPDATED WITH PIX 4:35 P.M. E.D.T. UPDATED WITH MORE PIX AND ANALYSIS 6:40 P.M. E.D.T.: James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia just completed installation of a FieldTurf artificial turf football field at their football stadium this summer. Ty Phillips, Director of Facilities for JMU told WPCNR the entire installation was completed in three months and cost under $1 Million. He noted that the bulk of that cost though was not installation, but for demolition of the concrete base the rug turf which the new Field Turf  replaced, and for grading a crown for the Field Turf surface for television purposes. He says that if you did not have to do much excavating the cost would be way below that.


 



Bridgewater Stadium on campus of James Madison University. The gridiron was converted in the summer of 2006 to FieldTurf in just 3 months. FieldTurf is similar to the synthetic turf proposed for Loucks and Parker Stadiums at White Plains High School and Highlands Middle School. It’s a field that’s soft to fall on. Gives a true “cut” every time and the James Madison Facilities Director says the players love playing on it. Photo Capture from James Madison University website.





Phillips said the switch to Field Turf move was made by the university for safety reasons, he said it’s much easier on the joints of the athletes. He reports that using rug turf, which consists of a carpet on a layer of concrete, “it’s basically hard as a rock,” you can expect to lose an athlete a year one knee injury a year because of the way the rug turf grabs your ankles.  Phillips said field turf according to a study he’s seen is a “cheaper” and safer a playing surface than natural grass.  He said he expects the new FieldTurf to last 12 years and possibly 15 years.


 



 


A FieldTurf installation in Libertyville Illinois, showing how soccer and lacrosse markings (in orange) are integrated into the “blade” turf. Photo Capture from Libertyville High School site.


 


Phillips said lining of the fields most likely would have to be done at time of construction, and that he was investigating the use of using removable paint on lines of other field configurations for the other two FieldTurf surfaces on the James Madison University campus. White Plains is touting their fields which are comparable to FieldTurf as being used for field hockey, soccer and lacrosse in succession.


 


Phillips said he does not recommend a FieldTurf like surface for Field Hockey because the long blades of FieldTurf slow down the ball too much, and the rubber surface is too soft. Our Field Hockey Coaches don’t like it for Field Hockey he said. He did note that shorter blade lengths of FieldTurf fibre could be ordered depending on the nature of the sport.  He said his baseball field has a FieldTurf infield surface which the players really like. The White Plains Athletic Department should pay close attention to what kind of blade length is installed at Loucks and Parker as well as field marking if the district is serious about multi-sport use at Loucks and Parker.


 



 


 LOUCKS FIELD at Twilight Sunday afternoon. Note the bare turf on the “crown” of the football field. Photo by WPCNR News.


 



Loucks Field Renovation: two sets of metal bleachers seating 3,250 (not 2,500) with press box, lights,. locker rooms, artificial turf system and 10-lane track on the straightaway. Cost: $ 6 Million (Approximate)Photo, WPCNR News.


 



Loucks Field Bleachers (wooden) Sunday afternoon. They would be replaced by metal stands, handicapped accessible, with new locker rooms behind them. Photo, WPCNR News.


 


I asked about maintenance of FieldTurf: “Between natural grass and field turf it’s unbelievable. On FieldTurf, we run a groomer over the surface once a month, and magically that just helps to level the rubber pebbles (under the surface) because they tend to congregate to different areas and you might get a low spot. As needed you run a little rake machine over it, basically it’s like a lawn sweeper and it’s to pull up any debris, leaves or anything like that and that’s all you do. No trimming. No lines to paint. There’s really no maintenance.”


 



The architect,. Erik Kaeyer noted thes advantages to a new artificial turf field.


 Photo, WPCNR News.


 



 


Parker Stadium Proposal: New set of metal bleachers, seating 1,300 with press box, plus installation of synthetic turf and running track. Cost: $3.4 Million. (Approx.) Photo, WPCNR News.


 



Twilight for Parker Stadium. Seen Sunday afternoon. Highlands Middle School is just behind the ancient concrete and stone bowl. Photo, WPCNR News.


 



The majestic ancient sweep of Parker Stadium Sunday afternoon. The concrete and stone structure is said to be unsafe, the bleachers in need of replacing, and deteriorated stairs and locker rooms. The old structure is said to be impossible to make disabled accessible. It would be replaced by a metal bleacher structure with a press box. Artificial turf would be installed on the grass field with a rubber surface walking track. Photo, WPCNR News


 


 


Phillips said he has not reduced his maintenance staff, but has been able to shift them to remaining grass fields and other tasks as a result of the reduced maintenance on the football and other FieldTurf fields. “If we had the money, we’re probably get some more (FieldTurf fields).”


 


Phillips said after his football team has played three games at their stadium, that the players love the new field because it is softer to fall on than a grass field. He said there have been football injuries but none related to the new FieldTurf. Phillips added that track runners love the field for light workouts because it is easier on their joints. He noted that compared to a grass field, the new FieldTurf installations save him thousands of dollars in materials costs every year as well as worker hours grooming the fields.


 


Football players WPCNR has spoken to, like turf to play on because they cut better, but one reason given stadium upgrades is to attract events to the community in the case of the high school field and provide more usage of Parker and Loucks by the community and city recreation programs.


 


No longer money-saving, Superintendent, Architect Say.


 


The City School District, up until Saturday morning made the case for the artificial stadiums based on the extended use and cost savings the artificial turf surface will provide. However on Saturday, Mr. Kaeyer said that the district will not save money on going to the synthetic turf field, and the Superindent of Schools agreed, Mr. Connors saying the benefit of the aritificial turf fields at Parker and Loucks would be increased usage.


 


 


Stadium Construction Major Part of  “synthetic turf” Construction.


 


The major cost of the project, though appears to be in the stadium stand construction. The reasons given by the School District for the stadium reconstruction is the dilapidated condition of the Parker stands, the non-compliance with Disabled Americans access rules, and the “unsafe” condition. Of course, the reason the stands are dilapidated is the school district neglect of the concrete over the years.


 


At the Loucks Field the main rationale for upgrading to new stands, press box, lights, locker rooms is to host outside district events such as Loucks Games, state football and soccer championships, Empire State Games, and to accommodate bigger time events.


 


No estimate of future revenue from such a state-of-the-art facility has been projected.


 


 


The cost of the new stadiums with artificial turf at Parker and Loucks is $9.6 Million. In twelve years according to Mr. Phillips, of James Madison White Plains would have to replace the turf. Phillips estimate is four years longer than what White Plains has been told. Replacing the turf (installed at the cost of  approximately $800,000  ($667,000 at Parker; $772,000 at Loucks) today according to the Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson estimate,  would involve at least a $1 million replacement WPCNR reckons  in either 8 years or 12, depending on how much White Plains used the field. Phillips, the James Madison Facilities Director estimated a 12 year life to his new field, but he uses that only for football and practices.


 


On the Highlands Parker Stadium Project, site work for providing a foundation for the bleachers costs $830,962; Safety Measures/Walks and General, cost $661,000; The turf, $667,000; and the balance of the estimate is filled out with Player’s benches, grading and excavation, drainage basins paiting, for $400,000. The total cost of the Parker project is put at approximately $3.4 Million


 


On the Loucks Project, the turf alone is estimated at $772,000, with Bleachers adding $1.5 Million, new track, $600,000; Lights, $300,000; Site work, $846,000; plus Tennis court reconstruction for $543,918. The overall Loucks reconstruction is put at $6 Million.


 


The $9.4 Million on the stadiums is supposed to be spent within the next year with both fields ready for play by fall 2007.


 


If you take for granted that the cost of the two new synthetic turf fields over 12 years is approximately $800,000, ($783,000 if the cost of the stadiums stays at $9.4 Million)  this means that the district choses to spend $800,000 a year on increasing field usage. No number has ever been estimated as to how many more games would be played or needed for that matter.


 


 For the same $800,000 a year, about eight full-time teachers could be hired for a full 12 years.


 


The Grass Cost: $320,000 vs. $9.4 Million.


 


In contrast, Michael Lynch, Administrator of Buildings and Facilities for the district estimated the cost of maintaining Parker and Loucks Stadiums as grass fields to be $11,480 a year each. Double that and you get a cost of $22,960 a year. Multiply that by 12 years, and you get $275,520 to keep the Parker and Loucks Stadiums grass, but of course you lose the multiple usage the artificial turf gives you.


 


Mr. Lynch also said he would recrown the grass fields once in the next 12 years for a cost of $44,000 for both grass field crowns, bringing the total estimated expenditure for maintaining two grass fields at Parker and Loucks as $320,000. Add say 60% inflation over 12 years and the cost comes to approximately $512,000 over 12 years as opposed to a $9.4 Million expenditure to build new stadia with artificial turf at Loucks and Parker, to increase usage of fields.


 


You could install artificial turf at Loucks and Parker to increase your usage for the $772,000 cost to turf each field only, ($1,544,000)  thus getting your usage and spending far less money. Whether the bleachers would be required by the state  to be improved is in question.


 

Posted in Uncategorized