Nicoletti: No Dump Cleanup for Yr. Test. Then Solutions. NYDEC O.K.’d No Cleanup

WPCNR Environmental Epitaph. By John F. Bailey. November 15, 2006: The 35-year contamination by TCEs – a documented  carcinogen – leaking from the City Dump into the Mamaroneck River will continue for at least another year according to Commissioner of Public Works Joseph Nicoletti told WPCNR Tuesday evening as it has for the last  three and a half decades,  according to Nicoletti with the approval of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.  


 



Commissioner of Public Works Joseph Nicoletti, City of White Plains briefing the Council of Neighborhood Associations on the status of his negotiations over the dump with the Department of Environmental Conservation. Photo, WPCNR News.



Mr. Nicoletti told the CNA that when test well samples  documented the TCE contamination in 1986, the DEC advised the city it was not necessary to clean up the TCEs because of the difficulty in shoring up the 20 feet deep or more excavations needed to reach the TCE “pocket” 15 feet below the compost, isolated by the city.

 


Nicoletti said he was willing at the time to clean up the TCE contamination in 1986-87, but that  “The state, at the time, said it was not worth the risk of opening that up.” There are no documents so far encountered in the DEC paper trail on this 30 year contamination that support that statement. A call has been made to the DEC press office to confirm this was the DEC directive at the time.


 


The Dump Update.


 


Nicoletti described the city dump situation with the Department of Environmental Conservation to the CNA. He told WPCNR that 20 new Test Wells have been drilled in the city dump at the request of the DEC to measure the current levels of TCEs in the dump. He advised the next step in the city efforts to continue the $100,000 plus-a-year composting operation in the dump is to test the ground water encountered in the new wells. He would forward the new levels of TCE contamination to the DEC. He and the DEC will evaluate the results.  At that time, he will advance possible solutions for cleanup to the DEC, if deemed necessary.


 


Asked if one of the solutions to the TCE leakage into the Mamaroneck River could be a filtering system, Nicoletti said possibly. The timetable the Commissioner told WPNCR would take a least a year from now to analyze what the new wells are telling him, discuss it with the DEC, and propose solutions for the remediation, if the DEC said it was needed.


 


A Limited Composting Operation Continues.


 


 Meanwhile, he told the Council of Neighborhood Associations the composting operations continues with DEC approval. It was not clear from what he told the CNA if or when the concrete pad (which he described would cover about two acres), as requested by the DEC, has been poured yet.


 


Leaving the CNA meeting, Nicoletti told WPCNR he did not expect any resolution on cleanup procedures to remediate the TCE contamination, if it is necessary at all, for at least a year.


 


This means the 36 years of leaking of TCEs from the City Dump/Compost adjacent The Greenway, into the Mamaroneck River from the dump will continue into a 37th  consecutive year, after having been identified by the DEC in the mid-70s and reconfirmed in 1986, according to DEC documents.


 


Just a Little Over Drinking Water Standards


 


Nicoletti described the seriousness of the leak saying it was “just a little over” the parts per billion standard for TCEs for drinking water that the DEC uses.


 


The Commissioner’s description “A little over” in 2006, according to the last Department of Environmental Conservation test report conducted on April 3, 2006, documents that the contamination level is 223 ppb, as opposed to the 005 ppb standard for drinking water. A contaminant level of .11 ppb was found in the West Branch of the Mamaroneck River according to the report:


 



 


 


The April, 2006 DEC Test Report Shows 180 ppb of TCEs as the level of TCE contaminent in a test well at the dump and a smaller level found in the Mamaroneck River on the site. Photo, WPCNR News Archive.


 


In other comments, Mr. Nicoletti said it was unfair to complain about his DPW not clearing drains on county roads: North Street, Mamaroneck Avenue, Old Mamaroneck Road, Bryant Avenue because he does not have jurisdiction over their roads.


 


At no time did Mr. Nicoletti say he wanted to clean up the TCE or how it would be accomplished or the cost.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Board Approves $1.9 Million in Refunds. Budget Mulled. $200M In 2 Yrs

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. November 14, 2006: The Board of Education approved $1,961,955 in certiorari tax refunds Monday evening, consisting of a $620,034 payback to The Winter Organization, owners of 81 Main Street, and to Sears for their 275 Main Street property in the amount of $892,751 for the tax years 1999-2003 and $449,170 for tax year 2004-2005. The amount will be paid out of the $8,000,000 certiorari bond floated October 2.


 


This is in addition to the $2,415,280 in certiorari approved for The Cameo House ($100,756), Gateway 1 Group ($662,097) and Macy’s East ($1,652,427) approved previously to be taken out of that bond. (The $1.65 Million to Macy’s is about $400,000 less than WPCNR had estimated when the city approved their certiorari agreement).


 


The School Board entertained preliminary discussion of the 2007-2008 budget, expressing the need for cost-cutting.


Les Storch, representing  Bennett Kielson Storch DeSantis,the auditors of the district presented the annual report of the City School District for the fiscal year ended June 30 and reported a $5.5 Million surplus. This surplus was due in part to a $1.6 Million unanticipated increase in collections of Utility Taxes and a $700,000 increase in interest plus the fund balance from last year. The increased income was due to higher interest rates, resulting in a fund balance of $8 Million, allowing the district an “undesignated fund balance” of $3,066,000. Storch said the district has earmarked $2.6 Million of that for future certiorari payments, or slightly less than 2% of the school district budget, the maxium percentage the school district is allowed to hold in anticipation of certiorari paybacks.


 


Budget Consternation


 


On the Board’s discussion of the 2007-2008 School Budget, Board members Terry McGuire and Donna McLaughlin supported close scrutiny of the effectiveness of school programs in deciding whether existing programs would be continued – McLaughlin suggested new programs only be initiated to “substitute” for programs not in addition.  


 


Board President Michelle Tratoros said the district should look closely at cutting administrative staff to affect savings, not teaching staff. Peter Bassano said the closeness of the capital project vote required conservative budget construction. “We need to be vigilant with this budget. We need to be very creative. I can’t imagine the District is going to submit a budget that looks like this year’s budget.” Bassano, in addition, said he feared to see the increase in the Transportation Budget.


 


Bill Pollak, another Board member demurred, saying the annual budget vote was “not as passionate. Every year, the budget passes. End of story. The bond vote does not necessarily indicate we won’t get the same positive support we get in the budget process.”


 


Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors agreed the bond vote was different from the budget vote, and said that White Plains has always supported and demanded quality education, low class size and supported the school budget.


 


Calling ABC Members.


 


Donna McLaughlin urged the Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors to bring the Annual Budget Committee into the process earlier. Connors said he would be putting together  the Committee of some 30 to 40 persons over the next month, saying he had already gotten persons calling Michele Schoenfeld, Clerk of the District, wishing to serve on the Committee.


 


Connors cautioned though, said the ABC Committee is “advisory” – that they do not decide on what the budget will be, but have the opportunity to “advise” the District on what they should do. Not decide. McLaughlin, suggested that terms on the Annual Budget Committee should be limited to three years, rather than the same persons serving year after year.


 


Connors said he would consider term limits on the ABC. He also said the committee would be formed in December and brought in when the budget is being developed in its preliminary stages in January.


 


Unions Await in Wings


 


No mention was made by any Board member on negotiations with the White Plains Teachers Association, The  Civil Service Employees Association and the Administrators and Supervisors Association.  Representatives of all three unions were at the meeting last night, but did not speak.  WPCNR asked the Superintendent of Schools about the status of the negotiations, and he said it was too early for that, that negotiations had not begun.


 


Jerry Gorski, President of the Teachers Union, in attendance last night, told WPCNR today that by law the union did not have to present their positions to the School District until February. He said the union would be surveying its members beginning in December on contract issues. Results would be tabulated and from those findings, “positions” would be developed.


 


Asked if the union would be taking into consideration the accelerated pace of district expenses (The budget is $165.8 Million in 2006-2007), Gorski said “We’re looking for a fair contract that will benefit the teachers and the school district.” Asked if the union would look at paying more of its health benefits, as they agreed to do for the first time three years ago in negotiating the present contract,  Gorski said “he was open to everything,” but could not address the giveback question until he saw what the school district was “looking for.”  He said that in the last contract that found the union agreeing that  individual members would pay $450 a year share in medical benefits and $950 for a family plan – the first time they had had to pay for health benefits.


 


Gorski appeared firm on retiree benefits, because he felt retirees were “less able”not in as good a position to absorb cuts in benefits as were presently active employed members.


 


Asked for a feel of what his union would seek in salary increases, Gorski said that in surveying other teacher organizations around the area, their increases have ranged 3.5% and up. The city awarded its police, fire, teamster, and civil service unions 4% raises three years ago through 2008.





Budget Trend Line


 


The school budget at $165.8  Million in 2006-2007 and has grown $86.4  Million from $89.4 Million in 1995-96. That is an increase of 86% in a decade when inflation has risen 26%. To finance this growth and the recent declines in city commercial assessments, the school district has increased Mr. and Mrs. White Plains school taxes 92%. From $202.91/$1,000 of assessed valuation(1995-1996) TO $449.64/$1,000 in 2006-2007.


 


In a projection issued February 27, the school district predicted it will spend $178 Million in 2007-2008.  Now let’s take this into 2008-2009. The School District Salaries, according to the Assistant Superintendent for Business office last spring will hit the $104 Million mark in 2008-2009, with fringe benefits hitting $42 Million, and the rest of the budget based on conservative 3% inflation will put the 2008-2009 budgets at $189 Million.


However the district 2008-2009 projection appears understated, because it assumed a 5% per annum increase and 6% per annum increase in transportation and utilities — both sure to escalate with the unforeseen escalation in fuel costs in recent months.


The 2008-2009 projection is a very generous budget prediction on debt service. The $189 Million 2008-2009 “Budget” lists debt service with no allowance for new certioraris in 2008-2009, and leaving out any mention of the capital improvements bond issue just passed.


The School Budget will break $200 Million in two years.

The school debt service would climb from approximately $6,000,000 in 2006-2007 to 10.6 Million in 2008-2009 if the school district floated the full $66.7 Million bond. That adds $4 Million to the $189 budget, lifting it to a minimum $193 Million in two years. This does not include any new certioraris the school district does not know about.It is not inconceivable that year-to-year expenses will bring additonal budget increases well beyond those February 2006 projections that will kite the 2008-2009 budget over $200 Million.



It is interesting to note that if that happens the budget will go from $165.8 Million this year (2006-2007) to $200 Million in two years.  

The School Budget is compounding at about $15 Million a year, so if you take that “automatic”  into play without budget cuts,  the price tag for education in White Plains should reach $180 Million in 2007-2008, and $195 Million in 2008-2009 without any increases in any expense areas.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Rapid Transit Talks Coming Up Between City-State

WPCNR Main Street News November 13, 2006: The Westchester Business Journal in an article by Alex Philippidis published today summarizes where the Tappan Zee replacement talks and rapid transit plans associated with that project stand at this time, reports  Paul Wood, the White Plains City Executive Officer as saying the city has been contacted by the state to begin discussions where either a bus or rapid rail transit stop or stops could be built within the White Plains downtown with talks scheduled to begin by December according to the state. 


Philippidis writes that the city of White Plains wants any rapid transit system — rail or bus — to link with the trolley service the city is now studying.  


Mr. Philippidis reports that Jeffrey Zupan, a consultant for the Regional Plan Association suggests White Plains needs two stops — the TransCenter at the West gateway to the city and at the Main Street-Mamaroneck Avenue intersection.








A stop at the Westchester Avenue office corridor is also envisioned in a map associated with Mr. Philippidis’s report from the Department of Transportion.


The article does not address whether the rail link would be underground or above ground — and exactly where it would be located. Other issues not raised are how any rail system is going to get to the White Plains Train Station without laying waste to a good portion of Greenburgh along Route 119– let alone reach  Mamaroneck and Main given the present state of density on either side of Main Street in White Plains. A bus transit system exists now in the county and it does not relieve enough traffic going across the county at the present time.


The following are the plans the state is considering:







+ Commuter rail (6 stops): From the bridge, trains enter a tunnel on the Westchester shore to a new Tappan Zee station north of the current tolls. Trains run underground, connect with the Hudson line just north of Lyndhurst, then resurface in Elmsford and stop just east at a new “Greenburgh” station with a park-and-ride lot. Trains follow I-287 till exit 5, where they enter another tunnel into downtown White Plains, with stops at the Metro-North station and The Westchester mall. Heading east, trains resume following I-287, stopping at Corporate Park Drive and at Purchase where another park-and-ride would be built, before ending in Port Chester at the village’s Metro-North station.



+ Light rail (15 stops): Service starts at Metro-North’s current Tarrytown station, follows the Hudson line to the Tappan Zee Bridge, then enters a tunnel into the new Tappan Zee station for a cross-platform transfer to trains bound for Manhattan. Trains stop at Meadow Way and Benedict Avenue before emerging above ground at Route 119, stopping at new Greenburgh West and Greenburgh stations. Trains follow I-287 to exit 5, then diverge to a new County Center stop into downtown White Plains, with stops at the Metro-North station, the Galleria at White Plains and The Westchester. From there trains head east into the I-287 corridor, stopping at Corporate Park Drive, two stops in Purchase and then Port Chester, where trains stop on Route 1 before ending at the Metro-North station.



+ Bus service (12 stops) would use a similar route and similar stops as light rail, but could extend past Port Chester into Stamford


 


 


 


 



 

Posted in Uncategorized

Greenburgh Looks at Transit Stops To Be Built as Part of Tap Zee Project.

WPCNR THE FEINER REPORT. By Greenburgh Town Supervisor Paul Feiner. November 13, 2006: The Greenburgh Town Board is currently reviewing a proposal I included in the 2007 budget to appropriate $30,000 from the town wide budget (unincorporated Greenburgh/villages) to hire a consultant to help us represent residents of the entire Town who will be impacted by any decision the State of New York makes regarding the Tappan Zee bridge.

    In 1952 construction was begun on a bridge crossing the Hudson, connecting Tarrytown and Nyack. A new bridge will have enormous impacts on the character of the Hudson Valley and Greenburgh. The cost of the bridge could be at least $14.5 billion dollars. There could also be construction related congestion problems for our area.


    An article in the November 13, 2006 issue of the Westchester Business Journal (www.westchestercbj.com) indicated that there will be up to 15 new transit stops along the way. Elmsford/Greenburgh was listed as a possible stop. This could include bus terminals or train stations. There are a variety of options: buses, commuter trains or smaller light rail trains.
     As the Business Journal article pointed out – once an option is chosen there are other questions that must be answered. Where will commuters park their cars? How many parking spots are needed near the planned stops? How many acres of property will need to be set aside for parking areas?


    The goal of the consultant study is to identify issues that will impact the town regarding the TZ bridge options. We want to make sure that your interests are advocated before the state finalizes any decision.


 PAUL FEINER


Greenburgh Town Supervisor

Posted in Uncategorized