High School Bans Student use of Cellphones, Hi-Tech Gizmos in Mid-terms

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. January 19, 2007:  WPHS students may not use cellphones and similar electronic gadgets inside an active examination room when WPHS midterms are administered next week. The ban is historic.


 


 


Parents of White Plains High School students received a recorded telephone message Friday from WPHS Principal Ivan Toper alerting them that their students will not be allowed to use cellphones, I-pods, earphones, video devices, mp3 devices, and similar hi-tech devices when they take the school mid-term exams.


 


It could not be determined from the message whether the ban extended down to the White Plains Middle School and Elementary levels.


 


 


Mr. Toper’s message in English only, delivered by the district’s automated call-out system, said New York State has banned use of such devices by students in exam rooms and that students caught answering cellphones, using them for whatever purpose in exam rooms, wearing earphones during a test, among other tech-related “use-modes” will be stopped from taking the test and subject to discipline.


 


Toper’s message said students could have cellphones on their persons in the examination room, but that had to be turned off and could not answered by a student. (WPCNR advises students not to take any electronic devices to school that day if they’re taking an exam, this being the first-time the ban is going to be in effect during exams. You do not want to make a false move.)


 


HI-TECH CHEATS


 


The unprecedented ban comes after a series of news reports detailing how students across the country are using cellphone text messaging, cellphone cameras, and mp3 devices to send questions to classmates outside of an exam room, who then text-message back the answers.


 


The announcement today is the first public news that the high school was even considering such a ban.


 


The New York Times reported in May of 2006 a variety of ways students use electronic devices to cheat on the college level: via Sidekick e-mail devices, with camera and text message exchanges, recording notes on Ipods and playing them back in an exam (a reason for the WPHS “earphone-in-action” ban). The Boston Globe reported on this phenomena as early as 2004.


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

County Declares 85 Court St. as Temporary. Relocation Possible. Timetable ?????

WPCNR THE HOMELESS NEWS. By John F. Bailey. January 19, 2007: Councilperson Rita Malmud, asked by Mayor Delfino to negotiate a removal of the 85 Court Street homeless shelter with Westchester County reports progress to WPCNR, revealing that the county is considering the shelter “temporary” — her words. Reporting to WPCNR on the results of her meetings with the county so far, Malmud issued this statement:


Mayor Delfino and I spoke about 85 Court Street a few weeks ago when I updated him on talks with County Executive Spano.   These talks were characterized as positive and productive.  I expressed confidence that the status quo would not remain.  Although I forget the specific and exact words used, it was clearly implied that this shelter was not permanent.


Ms. Malmud was asked by WPCNR Thursday in two separate telephone calls whether a new location in White Plains was being considered, whether a location outside White Plains was being looked at, whether better monitoring of the homeless during day was being developed, or even job and employment opportunities were being developed for the 85 Court Street population, but she did not respond to those questions.


Today, WPCNR has asked her for clarification on what the terms “positive and productive” mean, and when she thought it would be resolved.


This is the first time Westchester County has stated publicly that the 85 Court Street shelter is temporary. Previously when asked to remove the shelter by Mayor Joseph Delfino,due to its proximity to the downtown, and documented related incidents,  the county has balked — never indicating they were seeking alternate locations.


Donna Green spokesperson for the Westchester County Department of Communications, when asked if the county was viewing the 85 Court Street Shelter as “temporary” and was seeking to relocate it — something the county has refused to do in the political standoff between the County and the City — Green said “I have no answers for you at this time.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Firefighters Coat Drive

WPCNR MAIN STREET JOURNAL. From the Mayor’s Office. January 19, 2007: The White Plains Firefighters want to help those in need. Please help them by dropping off your coats, hats, gloves, sweaters, scarves, and
other winter wear now!

They have made it easy. Just drop off any of the items listed above to any of our five White Plains firehouses – all winter long.

Thank you for your support!

White Plains Fire Stations:

Station 1 – Old Mamaroneck Rd./ Gedney Way
422-6305

Station 2 – 20 Ferris Avenue
422-6319

Station 3 – Warren Street & Terrace Avenue
422-6307

Station 7 – 665 North Street
422-6315

Fire HQ – 219 Mamaroneck Avenue
422-6322

Posted in Uncategorized

Traffic Commission Takes Up Double Jeopardy Parking

WPCNR THE PARKING NEWS. Interview with Al Moroni, Commissioner of Parking with John F. Bailey. January 18, 2007: In response to citizen complaints, The City of White Plains is reviewing its on-street parking policies  that limit parking at downtown on-street meters and on unmetered streets in certain parts of town to the 1 or 2 hour time limits noticed on the meter or by signs,  regardless of whether you “feed the meter” when you park in or move your car to another spot on the same street.


 



Commissioner of Parking, Al Moroni.


 



Present White Plains Meters Do Not Advise Motorists Specifically they can only park for the limit imposed on a specific street once a day.


 


According to Mr. Moroni speaking to WPCNR today, the Traffic Commission has asked the Department of Parking, the Traffic Department and the Law Depart to meet and “to take a look at the ordinance and see what can be done to come up with an ordinance that is enforceable and understandable (to the public).”  Deputy Commissioner of Parking, John Larson said a date for that meeting has not been set.


 





An unspecified number of residents have gotten tickets when they have returned to the downtown, “fed a new meter” and still got a ticket when they parked on the same street they had parked on during their first trip to the downtown, according  to Commissioner of Parking, Al Moroni.


 


He said there have not been many persons this has happened to, but when it does, “it seems so unfair to them, they get pretty upset about it.” If, they return to the downtown and park on a different street at a meter, they would not get a ticket, Moroni said.


 


 


Moroni remarked that there are several issues the Commission is examining in addition to the controversial “Double Jeopardy” parking ordinance.  one  is parking beyond the limit in a parking lot beyond the 1 or 2 hour limit, regardless of whether you come back and feed the meter at the end of the two hours,  you receive a “Beyond the Limit” Ticket. After time has expired, you have to move your car to a garage or another parking lot, and cannot “feed the meter” to stay in the lot if if you move to a different space.


 


The second issue involves streets around the city which are not metered where signs say parking is limited to 1 or 2 hours. Neighborhoods don’t want people working in an adjacent area using their streets for parking for their business, Moroni said.


 


Double Jeopardy Clarification under review by “Task Force”


 


Moroni, whose Deputy Commissioner of Parking, John Larson, attended the Traffic Commission meeting Wednesday morning when the decision reexamine the “Double Jeopardy” issue was made, said “We are wrestling with how do we come up with a more fair way of treating this problem.”


 


The Traffic Commission, WPNCR had learned from a member of the commission, speaking to WPCNR under condition of anonymity, took up the “Double Jeopardy” problem and our original source reports that the commission members all agree it should be changed and it is “under review” as to how the meters can be “resigned” to cut down the possibilities of getting a second ticket even when you’ve fed the meter.


 


It has not been decided whether one of those options is eliminating Double Jeopardy.  Our source said, the talk is to make the meter instructions more explicit to enlighten motorists they can only park once on the same metered street during the meter enforcement times. 


 


White Plains Week First


 


The “Double Jeopardy Ticket” was first exposed by White Plains Week, the controversial Public Access Television news roundup show (cablecast to Mr. and Mrs. White Plains, Fridays at 7 and Mondays at 7:30 on Channel 76) last year.


 


 


Moroni explained how the White Plains street meter parker exposes himself to the “Double Jeopardy” Ticket:


 


“You park on Mamaroneck between Main & Post Road in the A.M . An officer scans your license into his computer at 9:30. You leave. You come back at 1:30 P.M., and park on the same street (Mamaroneck Avenue) but not in the same spot. The parking officer will give you a ticket (even if you have put money in the meter) because you have parked in violation of the beyond the limit of the area.” Moroni said “same area” means “same street.” “That’s how we’re interpreting and enforcing it,” Moroni confirmed.


 


 


The parking meters do not specifically warn you that you cannot park in another meter on the same street.


 


Moroni defended the Double Jeopardy system because he said, that without limiting parking on the same street, people who work in the stores in the downtown will be jockeying  their cars along the street their business is on, taking away space from legitimate shoppers.


 


$15 Fine Signs Placed in The Galleria


 


New signs warning motorists that after the Parking Office is closed in The Galleria, motorists are subject to a $15 fine, instead of the $2 overtime notice, have posted. Mr. Moroni said that $15 has always been in effect, and is not new, just that the signs are.

Posted in Uncategorized