Superintendent of Schools Retiring from District in 2 Years

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. By John F. Bailey. June 25, 2007: Timothy Connors in his fifth year as Superintendent of Schools in White Plains, and in the second year of his second contract with the district has announced his intention to retire in two years.



Superintendent of Schools Timothy Connors, May, 2007


Mr. Connors told WPCNR today that his present contract expires in June, 2008. As part of the contract, the Board of Education is required to tell him one year before expiration if they plan to renew his contract.


Connors told WPCNR the Board of Education wanted to renew his contract for three years through 2011. Mr. Connors said he told the Board his wife was retiring in a year and that he could not do that, but that he would stay two more years. Connors told WPCNR he would be leaving the district June 30, 2009


Connors told WPCNR this one year extension would enable him to get the district strategic plan into operation and oversee much of the new construction projects just underway: the new Post Road School, the Mamaroneck Avenue School and the two football stadium renovations.


Mr. Connors  joined the district in 2002. In five years, he  has stabilized and restored public confidence in the  school district, after replacing Dr. Saul Yanofsky when the school board refused to renew Dr. Yanofsky’s contract in 2001, which had created a crisis of confidence in the Board of Education.


He has embarked on a modernization program for the district requiring $69.6 Million in new construction. He appears to have turned around the district’s state achievement scores, efforts culminating this year in 70% passing scores at the eighth grade level.  He introduced this year,  a beginning effort to control the rate of district budget increases in the face of declining revenues. (The budget is expected to top the $200 Million level at the time of Mr. Connors’ departure, up from $127 Million in 2002 when he arrived).  Connors has introduced a complete turnover in the Superintendent’s cabinet.  

Posted in Uncategorized

Hotel Tax for WP Looks Good. 1/2 % Sales Tax Needs Budget Probe Bradley Says

WPCNR WHITE PLAINS WEEK NEWS June 24, 2007: White Plains has a good possibility of acquiring a hotel tax through the State Legislature, according to Assemblyman Adam Bradley, but Mayor Joseph Delfino’s plea for a ½% rise in the city sales tax to bring it even with other Westchester cities has to be carefully looked at and city fiscal policies scrutinized to justify it, Bradley said.



 


Assemblyman Adam Bradley discussed budget fix possibilities for White Plains in Albany in  remarks appearing on White Plains Week, the city news roundup show on Channel 76, when he was interviewed by the WPW news team of John Bailey, The CitizeNetReporter, (left) Peter Katz, former ABC-Television Network correspondent, (center). White Plains Week is aired Mondays at 7 and Fridays at 7:30 on Channel 76, “The Spirit of 76.”


 


The hotel tax is a greater possibility, Bradley said: “I think the hotel tax makes a lot of sense. New Rochelle got one this year. Rye City got one last year. It’s not a burdensome tax, in my opinion, in the text that the people who are paying it already are counting on paying it. A lot of corporations already put that into their balance sheets. It’s not going to be a residential tax. It’s going to be a tax that has little pain, and it’s going to raise the city a fair amount of money particularly with the prices the Ritz-Carlton will charge, and some of these other hotels that are going to open up. I think that would be helpful and something that makes sense. ”


He did not feel the legislature would be warm to increasing the White Plains sales tax – touted by Mayor Delfino as the cure for White Plains chronic budget gaps, and the failure of sales tax revenues from increased development rising above inflation.


“The increase in the sales tax is a little more problematic,” Bradley said. “I’m not sure we want to put ourselves at a competitive disadvantage right now. We have an advantage in our sales tax. I’m also concerned at the overall reliance in our budget on city sales tax. Remember, sales tax revenues are not fixed revenues. It’s very uncommon to have a budget where sales tax revenues account for over 40% of the revenues you raise. That’s unheard-of in this region. I don’t know anywhere that does that. Contrary to what Councilman (Glen) Hockley  indicated that Moody’s (a bond rating service) will like this. No. No. Those services are not going to like this.”


Katz brought up that Moody’s had warned the city against this. Bradley agreed, saying, “Exactly. When I heard Councilman Hockley had stated that, I recognized he obviously hadn’t spoken to Moody’s…because, if  you did, you would know they don’t like income, revenue-raising, that’s not fixed revenue sources. Overreliance on non-fixed revenue sources is a concern for them.”


Bradley indicated he was not saying he would not carry the ball the on the half-percent revenue increase the Mayor wants, but he is concerned and wants to analyze how the city got into this position of needing to raise the sales tax to make ends meet:


“I would be concerned, not that I’m saying no, what I’m saying is, I want to understand where the city is, how it got there. We’ve had a tremendous economic revitatilzation. I certainly have some concerns that we’ve evened the reserve each of the last,  at least since 2003, every year.”


Katz mused to Bradley, “There’s been a revitalization for developers, but if you look at the tax base, people just don’t understand why the tax base is continuing to shrink, despite all of the building that’s going on.”


Bradley responded: “I am concerned and I want to make sure that I understand the things that are happening and want to make sure things are being done in a wise fashion (financially) before I give an additional sales tax revenue that will be historic in nature. White Plains with its half-cent, raises substantially more revenue than Yonkers, New Rochelle and Mount Vernon do from a whole cent (sales tax). So, it really would be an historic  amount, an historic percentage in total revenue generated from a very regressive tax which is the sales tax. So before I adhere to that, I would certainly want to understand the dynamic of the city budget that has created what seems to be a lengthy ongoing fiscal problem for the city.”


 


Bradley Will Analyze city Budget Trends


Katz suggested it seemed Assemblyman Bradley was sharply criticizing the financial matters seen the last few years, even though the Democratic party voted for the budgets, “are you now saying the Democratic Councilpeople have not been doing their job in monitoring the fiscal situation?”


Bradley said, “No, I’m not saying that. I’m saying I , myself, want to go over the city budget. I certainly have some of the top fiscal people in the country on  staff, I want to review and analyze the city budget and go for a period of time to see what has transpired to understand why, during this economic revitalization, we’ve been eating into our reserves tremendously, why we’re having this fiscal problem. Clearly there are issues we all know about: We know that there was an issue about pensions and health care, that’s real. We know that commercial tax certioraris have had an impact on the budget. Those things are real. What’s not clear is why White Plains would have more problems than other cities (in Westchester). The problems that White Plains relates to and suggests are causations aren’t problems unique to White Plains. They are problems that hit other cities too, and yet they don’t seem to have the same revenue shortfalls that White Plains seems to be having right now.”


Katz asked, “Having been in Albany, seeing how money ebbs and flows in the state, and in White Plains, seeing how money ebbs and flows in the city, are we on positive a turn for the future in White Plains?”


Bradley said he did not know. He said “we need to understand what’s going on with the budget, and whether this (the extra half cent request) is something that makes sense as a fix. Because that’s what it is. We’ve already seen the short sightedness of in my opinon, of one-shot revenue deals that have gone awry.”


Katz brought up the LCOR affordable housing Bank Street project that infuses cash to balance the current budget. Bradley’s reaction:


“Selling city-owned property isn’t always bad. It is bad when you’re doing it  to fix an immediate revenue need.”


Equalization Rate Execution Stayed…


Bailey asked bout the status of the Equalization Rate Relief bill Bradley  and State Senator Suzi Oppenheimer are sponsoring in Albany – designed to stop the city’s bleeding on certiorari suits:


“As I’ve said continually, I’m ready to pass it in the Assembly, as long as I know it’s going to pass in the Senate. I spoke to Suzi (Oppenheimer June 14) and she wasn’t sure it would pass the Senate. If she can pass it, it will pass the Assembly. I have starred the bill, meaning it’s ready to be voted on. Basically, I’m the only one who has laid it aside and I’m the only one who can bring it back on the Assembly floor for a vote…I’m not a big fan of passing one-house bills. It doesn’t make a lot of sense. I think if there’s a partner in the senate we’re ready to pass it.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Former Mayor Calls for Evaluation of City’s Economic Development Policy.

WPCNR THE SUNDAY BAILEY. News Comment by former Mayor of White Plains, Alfred Del Vecchio. June 24, 2007:  In order to mitigate some of its cash flow and property tax problems, I would humbly suggest that White Plains reevaluate its economic development policy.

 

None can deny that, over the last twelve years, economic development has been at an all time high but so have our property taxes together with the additional complete loss of our cash balance. None can deny that we have been forced to sell city property, incur an all time high bonded debt, and terminate and liquidate our Parking Authority to acquire funds to prevent double digit property tax increases and replenish our fund balance. These, and other, assets are now gone with no plans to replace them.


 Announcements from our officials that incentives and gifts to developers are an investment for the future and “time will tell” begs for a response and two questions:

 After twelve years of promised prosperity, the future is now!

 If not now, when?
 

Would you invest your own money the same way you invested taxpayer’s money?

 

 Done properly economic development is good for a city. It can improve the quality of life for both the developer and the taxpayer if a critical, in depth Financial Impact Statement over the life of a development is made. Focus should be on the total dollar cost to the city for administrative, technical, and planning activities of all city departments involved with the development including a prorated analysis of all infrastructure use and improvements needed for the development to succeed.

 

Much of the data needed for these calculations are available to any good Budget Director and can provide our officials with the necessary tools for critical decision making. Applied to any city, this is called good financial planning in every ones interest. The cost to the city should be negligible. It was one of the original mandates of the Citizens Budget Committee which was organized in 1972/73

 

                                                                                      


Posted in Uncategorized

Paul Wood City Executive Officer Disputes Stackpole PILOT Analysis

WPCNR THE DEVELOPER NEWS. Statement from City Hall. June 22, 2007: Paul Wood, City Executive Officer, has issued a statement declaring as false the Robert Stackpole analysis of an $11 Million tax shortfall accorded one developer. Mr. Wood issued this statement Friday afternoon.



Paul Wood Says Stackpole Analysis is Wrong.


Once again, Mr. Stackpole makes misleading and incorrect comments that
you failed to verify and then compound by insinuating that PILOT
payments are somehow less than full tax payments. Mr. Stackpole claims
that developments by Louis Cappelli should be paying taxes of $12
million annually.  How he arrives at this figure is anyone’s guess since
he doesn’t explain except to say that he has invested $1 billion in the
developments. 


The number is clearly inflated and 221 Main Street is
still under construction.  Even if the combined development of Mr.
Cappelli had a market value of $1 billion, property taxes for properties
other than 1 to3 family homes are based on the income and expenses of
the property, not the market value.


Mr. Stackpole should read
“Everything you wanted to know about Assessments but were afraid to
ask” which was prepared by the City’s Acting Assessor Mr. Lloyd
Tasch, and has been posted on the City’s website for weeks. This
presentation in simple and clear terms explains how assessments are
done. It clearly explains that properties like those developed by Mr.
Cappelli are not assessed as Mr. Stackpole described.

The reality is that developments originated by Louis Cappelli will
contribute approximately  $5,800,703 in taxes and PILOT payments in 07 –
08.  This would make him the third highest taxpayer in the City behind
The Westchester mall and Con Ed.  The school district will receive
$3,882,395 next year, the County will receive $757,951 and the City will
receive $1,160,357 in taxes and PILOT Payments from the Cappelli
generated developments.

There is no PILOT on the property at 221 Main Street as Mr. Stackpole
erroneously stated.  The property is assessed at the land value and the
partial construction that has been completed. Would you want to pay full
taxes during the construction of your house, before you were even
allowed to move in?

You are absolutely wrong about PILOTs as well.  All but a small number
of existing PILOTS (including some that were negotiated prior to Mayor
Delfino’s administration) are based on FULL PROPERTY TAX EVALUATIONS
meaning that the School District, the City, and the County all receive
the same amount of revenue that they would if they were not PILOTS.  Why
can’t you get this? 


 

Posted in Uncategorized