JAN 27: OUTBREAK NORTHEAST: FLU ON RISE IN NY NEW JERSEY. BIRD FLU THREAT REAL. NYC “EMERGENCY ROOM” DISEASE ADMISSIONS REPORT DELAYED.

Welcome to the Northeast edition of Outbreak Outlook! It is only available to paid subscribers. If you wish to become a paid subscriber and access region-specific information, please click the Subscribe now button below. Thanks for reading! -Caitlin

Respiratory Diseases

ILI

As I wrote in the National edition, the Trump administration’s pause on health communications interrupted flu data, specifically outpatient influenza-like illness.

To close the gap, I visited all 50 websites of the state health departments, and gathered what I could.

At the national level, flu defied my expectations by resurging after two consecutive weeks of improvement.

Unfortunately, the Northeast is affected by this trend, with New Jersey and New York seeing increases in influenza-like illness. New Jersey and Connecticut also saw marked increases in emergency department visits, suggesting the region is seeing a second peak.

In New York City, hospitalizations are fairly low and stable. Still, the city continues to report 1-2 deaths from Covid-19 each day. 

Northeast Outpatient ILI %
Create interactive, responsive & beautiful charts — no code required.

New Jersey leads the region with ED visits at 8.0% (up sharply from 6.0%, a 32% increase). New York shows elevated activity with ED visits at 5.2% (up from 4.3%) and the region’s highest hospitalization rate at 9.1 per 100,000 (up from 8.0), with ILI visits at 3.7%. Pennsylvania reports increasing ED visits at 4.4% (up from 3.4%).

Connecticut shows significant increases with ED visits at 5.7% (up from 3.7%, a 53% increase) and hospitalizations at 7.4 per 100,000 (down from 9.5). Massachusetts reports ED visits at 5.2% (up from 3.6%), with ILI visits at 6.9%. Rhode Island shows lower but increasing ED visits at 3.4% (up from 2.7%).

New Hampshire reports ED visits at 5.2% (up from 4.3%). Vermont shows moderate activity with ED visits at 3.3% (up from 2.4%), with ILI visits at 2.8%. Maine maintains the region’s lowest ED visit rate at 2.1% (virtually unchanged from 2.1%), with ILI visits at 3.7%.

I could not find updated information for New York City. The city’s next report will be published here, but I’m not sure when it will become available.


COVID-19

Indicators are mixed in the Northeast. Wastewater activity is high in most states, and hospitalizations are elevated, but ED visits remain minimal.

Wastewater activity is moderate after declining dramatically in the Northeast, dropping by half in the past two weeks. However, right now the regional average obscures a more complicated state-level picture.

Source: CDC

While wastewater activity is minimal and stable in New York, it is high or very high everywhere else.

In Massachusetts, activity is very high and held roughly stable this past week. Activity is high and increasing in New Jersey. In contrast, activity is decreasing, but still at very high levels in Maine and at high levels in Vermont, Connecticut, and Rhode Island. (Data are limited for Pennsylvania and New Hampshire).

Severe illness is mixed: ED visits are minimal, but hospitalizations are elevated. ED visits are minimal and decreasing across much of the Northeast. ED visits have decreased from 3 to 1.8% in the past couple weeks in New Hampshire and from 3.1% to 1.4% in Maine. ED visits are minimal and decreasing in Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. Connecticut is the only state that reported a (slight) increase in ED visits this past week, up to 1.7% (low).

Hospitalizations are elevated in the Northeast, with most states hold fairly steady between 4 to 6.5 hospitalizations per 100,000 people. The exception is Pennsylvania, where hospitalizations are very high (12.3) and increasing.

In New York City, hospitalizations are fairly low and stable. Still, the city continues to report 1-2 deaths from Covid-19 each day.

Source: CDC

In better news, hospitalizations decreased substantially in Massachusetts, from 9 to 5.6.


RSV

Activity is moderate to low across the region, with most states seeing a decrease in the percent of ED visits for RSV. I expect continued decline in the weeks ahead, though it’s worth noting that activity remains elevated compared to the off-season.


Stomach Bugs

Nothing new reported this week due to the Trump Administration’s pause on health communications. Given how high rates were last week, I expect norovirus to still be very active this week. Keep washing those hands.


Food recalls

The following foods are being recalled because they are contaminated. Please check your cupboards and throw out any of these items:

New:

  • Nothing new. Two recalls not related to food contamination were posted, so this is not due to lack of reporting.

Previously reported:

  • Casa Mamita frozen chicken and cheese taquitos (more info)
  • Wicklow Gold Cheddar Cheeses (more info)
  • Blue Ridge Beef Kitten mix [for Cats] (more info). While not for human consumption, humans may be infected with Salmonella if they do not adequately wash their hands or contaminated surfaces after handling the product.
  • Marketside Broccoli Florets (more info)
  • Connie’s Thin Crust Cheese Frozen Pizzas (more info)
  • If you have food allergies, you may wish to review these FDA safety alerts and USDA alerts for foods with undeclared allergens.

In other news–BIRD FLU SPREADS TO NY, MASSACHUSETTS.

  • New York’s Crescent Duck Farm, the last commercial duck farm on Long Island, culled its entire 100,000-bird flock and the laying off of 47 staff members following an outbreak of H5N1.
  • The farm, a fourth-generation family business since 1908, supplies nearly 4% of the nation’s duck meat and is known for its high-quality birds. Despite strict biosecurity measures, the virus breached the facility, prompting a months-long sanitization process and quarantine. Thousands of duck eggs will be sanitized and hatched offsite to potentially rebuild the flock.
  • D.W. Field Park in Brockton, Massachusetts has closed due to a potential bird flu outbreak, following reports of dead geese and swans at Upper Porter Pond. This closure comes days after 60 birds were found dead at Billington Sea in Plymouth, about 20 miles away. Park officials have urged the public not to touch injured or deceased birds. Testing to confirm bird flu could take up to a week, with no timeline yet for reopening.
Posted in Uncategorized

JAN. 25 — STANDARD AMUSEMENTS RESPONDS ON PLAYLAND DEPARTURE WITH STATEMENT

“For over a decade, we have tirelessly worked to revitalize Playland and restore it as a special place for residents and visitors for generations to come. We are proud of the progress we made towards achieving our vision, including improving rides and attractions, engaging local artists to enhance the park with their creativity, establishing new traditions through robust community programming, launching a seasonal ferry service, and much more to create dynamic opportunities and memorable experiences for our community.

But, fully realizing our vision required the County to meet the construction obligations necessary to complete improvements to the park. Despite spending over $150 million of taxpayer money— already surpassing their $125 million budget intended to cover completion of the entire project—the County has proven incapable and is nowhere near done. Accordingly, our contract, negotiated over the course of nearly a year with the assistance of a federal judge, was carefully structured with contractual deadlines for construction to ensure our extensive renovation plan stayed on track. And, in the event the County failed to meet those deadlines, the contract contained a detailed formula outlining precisely what the County would owe Standard Amusements in these exact circumstances.

The County, by its own admission, failed to meet those deadlines, over and over again, despite our consistent flexibility and patience, including a blanket one-year extension on all of their project deadlines. Our contract lays out plainly that we are entitled to terminate the agreement and the amount of damages that are due.

Nevertheless, upon receiving formal notice of termination this week, the County is ignoring these simple truths and opting to pursue two failed strategies we know all too well from our past legal battle: (1) inventing Standard Amusements defaults to muddy the waters in the eyes of the public; and (2) intentionally misrepresenting our agreement to cover up their own breaches. This strategy failed miserably years ago when their dishonest claims were rejected in court, and cost Westchester taxpayers nearly $10 million in legal fees. Sadly, the County seems determined to go down this ill-advised path again.

Regarding our contract, the wording is clear. Legislator Parker may say this is a “marriage made in hell”—but the fact is we have a prenup.

As for the future of Playland, the outlook is uncertain and deeply concerning. We want the park to have a successful season in 2025 and beyond. To that end, since November, we have made every effort to work with the County to unwind our relationship in an orderly and responsible way. These offers have thus far been ignored. It is not apparent to us how the County, after squandering the months we have afforded them, will be ready to open Playland for the start of the season.

We sincerely hope—for the sake of Westchester County residents and visitors, our 48 employees, and ultimately the taxpayer—that the County changes its attitude and decides to prioritize the park and stops wasting time and money trying to spin and misdirect the public.”

Andrew Merrill, Anne Hart
Prosek Partners for Standard Amusements
[email protected]

Posted in Uncategorized

JAN 25–SYCAMORE LANE BUDDHIST TEMPLE PROPOSAL: TROUBLING COMMUNICATIONS

WPCNR THE LETTER TICKER. January 25, 2025:

(Editor’s Note: A Special Meeting of the Common Council to hear a presentation on 1 Sycamore Lane  Buddist Temple proposal, off Rosedale Avenue will take place Monday evening 6:30 PM at City Hall.)

Other problems in the south end question building department akin to
the cannabis dispensary saga

 

 

From: Rosedale Residential Association

P.O. Box 199, White Plains, New York, 10605

 

To: White Plains Mayor Thomas Roach

The Common Council of White Plains

 

Date: January 24, 2025

 

Subject: 1 Sycamore Lane Development Proposal

 

Dear Mayor Roach and Members of the White Plains Common Council,

 

As you are aware, concerned residents of the Rosedale neighborhood have appeared before either the Common Council or the Zoning Board of Appeals on a continuous basis since May of 2024 to express their concern over the proposal to develop 1 Sycamore Lane into a Buddhist Temple Campus.

 

On August 7, 2024 the ZBA held its first public hearing regarding their request to obtain several variances for wetlands setbacks, parking, setback and structure height.  In response to the development proposal, on August 23, 2024, residents of the Rosedale neighborhood filed an appeal of the City’s Building Department’s interpretation of the City’s Code as it relates to the number and scope of the required variances.

 

At the ZBA public hearing on September 4, 2024, the attorney representing the 1 Sycamore applicant represented that the applicant intended to file a revised plan for its campus within the next couple of weeks.  Inasmuch as the plans would be changing, it was agreed between the ZBA and the counsel for the Rosedale Neighborhood’s interest that the appeal application would be adjourned until the revised plans were submitted and the concerned neighbors had an opportunity to review the revised plans.

 

Weeks turned into months and we didn’t see any new plans.  So, in September, October and December 2024 we made FOIL requests for the entire file regarding the 1 Sycamore Lane application.  On December 30th, in response to a call requesting the status of the plans from a Sycamore Lane resident to the ZBA secretary, the secretary informed the resident that no new plans had been submitted.

 

On January 7th, one day before the January 8th ZBA hearing, we received a response to the FOIL requests. What we discovered was both shocking and disturbing.  For starters, we learned that revised plans WERE filed with the City on at least THREE separate occasions, September 26, October 28 and November 1. HOWEVER, none of the plans were provided to us in response to the FOIL request.  It was only after we brought this to the attention of the ZBA that they were sent to us, two days after the January 8th ZBA hearing.

 

Besides the failure to disclose the three plan submissions, we were appalled to read in a communication from counsel for the 1 Sycamore Lane applicant to the Deputy Building Commissioner that he was aware that the City intended to stand by its “previously issued interpretations and application of the White Plains Code.”  That email is dated September 19, 2024, just 27 days after our appeal was filed.  We ultimately did receive a formal decision from the City at 5:00 PM on January 8th, two hours before the scheduled ZBA hearing.  Of note, earlier in the day on January 8th we received an email from the ZBA secretary reminding us that our appeal application was on the agenda for that night.  We never received such an email for our prior appearances.  Despite the fact that we had not received the plans and despite the fact that we received the City’s position regarding our appeal just moments prior to the hearing, it appeared that the ZBA was ready to rule on our appeal.  We ultimately convinced the ZBA to adjourn our application until we could review the plans and the position taken by the City’s Building Department.

 

We believe there are some very serious problems within your Building Department.  Why would they not provide us with copies of the plans in response to a FOIL request? As you are aware, failure to comply with a FOIL request can expose the City to significant damages. Why would the opposition attorney know the City’s position with regard to our appeal and we were not told of the decision some three months later, just a couple of hours before the Building Department wanted the ZBA to make a ruling?

 

As a result of the above we have serious concerns as to how the City will fairly review the application to develop this property.  Among others, are questions of collusion, bias and transparency.

 

This proposal is best described as trying to place a square peg into a round hole.  The property is located in a R1-30 zoning district which does allow for religious facilities.  In fact, the Unitarian Church is situated on the opposite side of Sycamore Lane.  The use of this property as a Buddhist Temple is not our concern.  Our concerns are the environmental impact and the impact on the character of the neighborhood.

 

We encourage each of you to visit the site to understand what we are referring to.  This 4 acre site is bisected by a bucolic stream that feeds directly into the Mamaroneck River.  As you are keenly aware, during storm events, the residents downstream of this body of water are continuously flooded.  And, it’s not just your constituents, but our neighbors in Harrison, Mamaroneck, Scarsdale and Rye are catastrophically impacted as well.  Both the Town of Harrison and Village of Mamaroneck have submitted to the ZBA letters of opposition to this proposal.  Of the 4 acres, approximately 3 acres are either wetlands or in the wetlands buffer.  This proposal, if allowed to be built, places a parking lot, an ancillary “tea house/souvenir shop” and a 12,000 – 9,000 SF temple (which includes dormitory style bedrooms for visiting worshipers) all within the wetland buffer (Including one structure within 5’ of the stream).  Additionally, and significantly, the proposal calls for the erection of a 30’ tall pagoda to be placed atop an environmentally protected rock outcropping.  The Building Department noted that this site is “Environmentally Sensitive” and hence requires Planning Board approval.

 

Recognizing the importance of protecting environmentally sensitive locations and the City’s wetlands, as recently as 6 months ago you enacted a law to provide further protections against this exact type of encroachment into the wetlands and the wetlands buffer.  This proposal will be the first (or one of the first) tests as to whether the City actually cares about environmentally sensitive lands or if it was just giving lip service to appease certain constituents.

 

While we continue to dispute the Building Department’s code interpretation and believe that the applicant’s proposal requires more than 10 significant area and use variances, the Building Department in its denial letter recognized 4 required variances, 3 of which exceed the requirement by more than 50%.  In other words, these are not just minor variances.  It’s as if the applicant totally disregards the existing zoning!

 

The applicant would have the City believe that it wants to develop this property with over 15,000 SF of buildings to accommodate no more than 12 monks and a once-a-year celebration with 50 visitors.  In order to meet their needs, they require the City to grant a significant parking variance (They claim they need a variance of 36 spots) and they need the City to agree to totally disregard the wetlands protection law that it so recently enacted.

 

We can’t think of a worse scenario for the use of this property.  If this applicant wants to use this property for a Buddhist Temple, we will welcome them as neighbors.  Just don’t allow them to destroy our sacred wetlands and the character of our neighborhood.  Grant them permission to build in conformity with the existing zoning and environmental laws of the City.  No one is interested in infringing upon their rights to practice their religion, but it can’t be achieved by taking away our rights and our property.  This property can be used to accommodate a Buddhist Temple, just not as the current proposal desires.

 

Thank you for hearing our concerns regarding the impact of this proposal and the handling of the applications before the ZBA.

 

Very truly yours,

Rosedale Residential Association

 

Anthony Fiorenza, President

 

Shawn Woodford, Vice President

Sara Bergman, Secretary

Angie Shaver, Treasurer

John Cherico, Board Member

Jeanene D’Ambrosio, Board Member

Laurie Halstead, Board Member

Carolyn Kennedy, Board Member

Jeremy Arcus Goldberg, Board Member

Mike Sanchez, Board Member

Charles Lederman, Board Member

Chris Barry, Board Member

Jolie DeLaCruz, Board Member

Gregory Fitch, Board Member

Ariel Jamil, Board Member

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized

TONIGHT AT 7:30: WHITE PLAINS WEEK THE JAN 24 REPORT WITH JOHN BAILEY AND THE NEWS–FIOS CH. 45. OPTIMUM WHITE PLAINS CH 76 AND WWW.WPCOMMUNITYMEDIA.ORG

STANDARD AMUSEMENTS DECLINES TO RUN PLAYLAND THIS YEAR. FUTURE OF PARK IN DOUBT

HOUSING HARD TO AFFORD. INTEREST RATES NOT GOING DOWN. PRICES STAYING HIGH

WESTCHESTER D.A CHARGES FORMER OFFICIALS OF GREENBURGH-

GRAHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR ALLEGDLY MIS APPROPRIATING $50,000

EMERGENCY VISITS FOR COVID STILL ON RISE IN NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY

CITY GRANTS PERMIT FOR CANNABIS DISPENSARY IN ROSEDALE NEIGHBORHOOD. ROSEDALE STUNNED. DID NOT KNOW

CONGRESSMAN LATIMER REPORTS WHAT COMMITTEES HE WILL BE ON IN THE HOUSE

WITH JOHN BAILEY AND THE NEWS

EVERY WEEK ON WHITE PLAINS WEEK

FOR 24 YEARS,

Posted in Uncategorized