Benefits of Turning Your School/University Green — Spano Global Warming Panel

WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. Special to WPCNR from Paula Piekos. February 27, 2008: A CitizeNetReporter attended the County Global Warming Conference Tuesday, and attended the Education K-12 Panel in which advantages of Westchester County Schools switching to green, environmentally friendly practices were discussed. Here is her report:



The Education Panel for Grades K-12 holds forth at Manhattanville College Tuesday: Left to right: Jeff Perlman, Bright Power, Inc.;  Dr Steven Frantz  Sustainablity Coordinator for Scarsdale Schools (Retired principal);Dr Frances Wills, Superintendent of Briarcliff Schools; Ellen Weininger, Grassroots Environmental Education; Katie Ginsberg, Exec Director, CELF (Moderator of panel)


 

 


The Benefits of Green Schools



The session started with Jeff Perlman clarifying that this isn’t the same thing as “Environmental Education” because it also has to do with economic systems and social justice.

 

He said that the additional cost to build a green school is about 3% more, but the net financial benefit over time is 15 – 30% more, although whatever the profit, it is just something that we have to do.

He said you pay more for insulation, better windows, and the usage of more natural materials, but it’s better in the long run.



The benefits include:

 

Enhanced Air Quality

Increased Learning , Productivity and Performance 3%

Increased future earning of students 1.4%

Reduced Asthma   25%

Reduced cold & flu 15%

Reduced teacher turnover 3%

He then added that the exact percentage might not be right, but the important thing is that it’s not zero.



I can personally attest to this because I have had very long-term substitute gigs twice, with the reason for the teacher’s absence being due to illnesses related to air quality.



There was a $ per square foot chart that I didn’t have time to copy, but supposedly all of the information from the sessions offered on Tuesday are available online.



Mr Perlman then spoke about the greening of existing school buildings.

 

He spoke about benchmarking energy performance through energy star benchmarking tools and other metrics, auditing energy hogs, using lighting retrofits, and updating heating systems and controls. He spoke of the the importance of using low VOC paints, carpets and finishes.



SCHOOL AS LABORATORY

 

He said it was good for the students to be involved and talked about the “Transparent Boiler Room” where you could see it and the pipes throughout the school were color-coded.   The pipes and ductwork were“roof and water management





Dr Wells of Briarcliff Schools reported they have a “No Waste Day.” They come to school and think about how they can make no waste. And she quoted a line from Dr Seuss’ book, The Lorax,  “Unless someone like you cares an awful lot, nothing’s going to get better, it’s not!”



Dr Frantz and Ms Weininger had limited time due to the impending break, but Dr Frantz spoke about Scarsdale’s “No idling” policy, and attempt to purchase clean buses.  He also spoke about the organic gardens on the grounds of the schools and week-long Sustainability Education courses given by the Scarsdale Teacher’s Institute.  They also make a course available to the teachers on water education, given at the middle school, and run by Cornell University’s “Project Wet” group.



Ms Weininger was running out of time, and gave a rushed talk about environmental education.



I would have liked it if someone from the planning committee, WP Board of Ed, or the architects had been there to speak about the plans for the New Post Road School, as I understand that it will be a totally green school. and it would have fit in well with this program.



Further information about this forum can be attained through web sites: www.brightpower.biz,  www.masstech.org, and www.cap-e.com or the County’s site about the forum.


Posted in Uncategorized

Comptroller: IDAs Should Shape Up.


WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. From the State Comptroller Press Office. February 27, 2008: State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli today proposed measures to make Industrial Development Agencies (IDAs) more accountable and financial reporting more accurate after a report released today found that IDAs continue to report project, job creation and other data that is inconsistent, incomplete and not independently verified.

DiNapoli outlined his recommendations in a
report that examines the financial and employment trends of the 116 IDAs in New York State. His measures include:


State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli today proposed measures to make Industrial Development Agencies (IDAs) more accountable and financial reporting more accurate after a report released today found that IDAs continue to report project, job creation and other data that is inconsistent, incomplete and not independently verified.

DiNapoli outlined his recommendations in a
report that examines the financial and employment trends of the 116 IDAs in New York State. His measures include:


  • Tightening IDA annual reporting requirements. Under current law, an IDA’s authority to offer state tax exemptions is suspended if it fails to report complete or substantially complete annual financial information. Starting with the 2007 reporting year, the Office of the State Comptroller (OSC) will be increasing its oversight of IDA reporting and generally accept only those audited annual financial statements that are in compliance. For example, an IDA which omits job information could have their ability to provide financial assistance suspended.
  • Expanding his office’s oversight of IDAs and Local Government Development Corporations (LDCs) to include access to tax and wage data during audits.
  • Calling for an increase in Executive programmatic oversight of IDAs through existing statutory oversight powers of the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) and Authority Budget Office (ABO) in the areas of job and wage verification.

“IDAs are supposed to create jobs,” DiNapoli said. “When they report on job creation, taxpayers should know that the numbers are right. Given the way IDAs are currently reporting information, there is no way of knowing that. These measures will make IDAs more accountable to the public they serve and establish clear standards that IDAs must follow, or they risk serious consequences.”

IDAs are independent public authorities that offer real property tax abatements, sales and mortgage recording tax exemptions, and low interest rate bonds to attract, retain and expand businesses. There are currently 116 active IDAs, including 56 IDAs serving counties and 60 IDAs located in cities (26), towns (29) and villages (5).

Each IDA is legally required to submit a financial statement to OSC annually, which includes data related to the number of jobs created or retained and the amount of all tax exemptions authorized. In 2003, OSC undertook efforts to improve the accuracy and quality of the data reported by IDAs, as well as collaborated with the ABO to develop a comprehensive online reporting system called the Public Authorities Reporting Information System (PARIS) that was implemented in November 2007. In addition, OSC continues to offer guidance to IDAs in meeting statutory requirements.

While there have been improvements in data reporting, the report issued today found the complete project costs were not available for 27 percent of all projects. In addition, complete and accurate job data was not reported for 9 percent of all projects.

Other report findings include:


  • IDA Project Growth: IDA supported projects grew by 16 percent between 2003 and 2006, 41 percent of this growth occurred in service-related projects. Manufacturing-related projects declined by 4 percent during this period. By 2006, IDAs were supporting $41 billion in projects, led by the New York City IDA with $14.7 billion in projects.
  • Activity Concentrated in Few IDAs: In 2006, six IDAs accounted for 40 percent of all projects. Those IDAs include New York City (539 projects), Monroe County (348 projects), Erie County (305 projects), Amherst (127 projects), Suffolk County (115 projects) and Nassau County (101 projects). The average IDA supported $246 million in projects, excluding New York City. Thirty-nine IDAs reported fewer than 10 projects in 2006, with six IDAs reporting only one project.
  • Cost Per Job Created: IDAs claimed that cumulative employment grew by more than 228,000 jobs in the projects they supported by 2006. However, OSC found that IDAs did little to verify the accuracy of the information reported by individual employers. The annual cost per job created ranged from $0 to $121,818, with an average cost of $4,195.

DiNapoli will also propose more comprehensive public authority oversight legislation including controls on authority debt, addresses board member terms and limits on the types of activities that authorities provide to those related to their core missions.

To view the report release today, visit
http://www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/pubs/research/idareport08.pdf.

To access annual report information from individual IDAs, visit
http://www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/datanstat/findata/index_choice.htm.

Posted in Uncategorized

The Engineer’s Engineer: Joseph ‘Bud’ Nicoletti

WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT.  February 27, 2008: The Westchester/Putnam Chapter of the New York State Society of Engineers has named White Plains Commissioner of Public Works, Joseph “Bud” Nicoletti as their “Engineer of the Year,” as a professional engineer who over time, “has made significant contributions to the profession.”



The Engineer’s Engineer


2008 Westchester Putnam Engineer of the Year


White Plains Commissioner of Public Works


Joseph “Bud” Nicoletti


Mr. Nicoletti was given the award last Saturday night, February 23 at Mansion Hill in Briarcliff Manor at the Society’s Annual Engineer’s Week Dinner Dance.  Mayor Joseph Delfino was on hand for the occasion. The Society’s Albany Headquarters is also considering Mr. Nicoletti for the “statewide” Engineer of the Year Award.


Alfred Freed, an engineer with Westchester County Department of Public Works for 42 years,  in announcing the award to Mayor Joseph Delfino, wrote:


“I can unequivocally say that Bud is a quintessential professional. The City’s (White Plains) infrastructure reflects this expertise, as it has kept pace and coped with the burgeoning development without breaking down or being overwhelmed. 


I received the same award in 1988. Unlike the challenges Bud now faces, back then Trump was a term in card games, nighttime bowling was a sport on downtown Mamaroneck Avenue, occasional horses roamed along our parkways, the Courthouse didn’t leak and we rarely experienced tornadoes or blizzards.


The challenges of today make his efforts even more impressive. White Plains owes him much.”


This is the second time Mr. Nicoletti has been honored in this fashion by the Society. He was named “Outstanding Engineer in Government” by the chapter in 1996.

Posted in Uncategorized

CO2 Action Plan Voluntary..Communities to Analyze Conditions—County to Monitor

 


WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. By John F. Bailey. February 26, 2008: Over 300 persons including county officials, environmentalists, educators and concerned citizens gathered at Manhattanville College in Purchase today to hear County Executive Andrew Spano, and Reese Berman, Chair of the County Executive’s Task Force on Global Warming introduce a Westchester Action Plan that calls for the County to reduce its “carbon footprint” by 20% by 2015 and 80% by 2050.


 



The County Executive at the podium, emphasized “We can and must do this. We cannot fail.” His plan introduces steps the County, Municipal, Business, Education and Housing sectors can take to reduce their carbon emissions to begin to address the global warming crisis.  The plan and its suggestions may be viewed at www.westchestergov.com/globalwarming.


 




The County Executive said that institutions, businesses and communities and individual residents can find specific actions  on this site, that they can take to limit collectively the county output of greenhouse gases. Executive Spano reported the county’s next step involves municipalities and towns conducting an analysis of practices in effect now in their areas to assess the extebt if their community  Carbon Dioxide impact and consider/take steps to lower it by 2% a year.



County Executive Spano told WPCNR that existing county departments would monitor municipality and town efforts to analyze their community “carbon footprints.”  Executive Spano emphasized he was not anticipating creation of any new departments or personnel added to the County to administer this task, that present county departments would undertake the monitoring and whatever comes next.  



It was not clear from today’s conference the timelines communities, businesses and institutions would be given to cutback on their carbon emissions and how the county would address the situation if communities failed to reach targets, if they fell behind or did not comply.  The timelines were said  to be included in the plan on the website (the front page of which is below, http://www.westchestergov.com/globalwarming.




Reese Berman, chair of the Task Force said additional information for households, businesses and schools will be added to the on line website and more actions by the county will be forthcoming.  She said the county is setting a goal of 2% or more reduction a year in carbon emissions to cut them by 20% by 2015.  


 



Berman showed a slide indicating the 2005 County Collective C02 Emmissions. Residential Energy accounted for 30%; Transportation 38%, Non-residential energy, 29%, Waste, 3%. Spano noted that the county recycles about 80% of its garbage accounting for the 3% waste.


This she said would put the county on target for 80% reduction in the emissions by 2050. She spent most of her talk  explaining how the carbon-emission cutback steps are presented on the website for each sector: Municipalities, County Government, Education, Business, and Housing, and how they could be utilized by the sectors to  begin the carbon emmissions reduction.


The conference broke up into individual sessions on what the five sectors of Westchester would be expected to do to reach that goal.



Housing Panel unfolds in The French Parlor at the Manhattanville Castle in Purchase.


In the Housing segment WPCNR attended from 10:45 to 11:30 AM, the task appeared daunting. WPCNR observed that the individual homeowner has a long way to go. Dani Glaser of Croton-On-Hudson, the lead panelist emphasized that “Awareness is the first step to change.”


Susan Cember of Action for Tomorrow’s Environment,  observed that  “We should not underestimate the power of one,” and pointed out that the residential sector through their energy use is the largest contributor to county Carbon emmissions (37%).  She said the individual resident first has to determine their annual output of  the number of tons of carbon emissions their household puts out into the environment each year by going to the Nature Conservancy site, www.nature.org and clicking on the “Carbon Calculator.”



The Carbon Calculator Link is at lower left corner of the Nature Conservancy homepage which links you to the Calculator below:



Ms. Cember said her family’s  personal carbon footprint was 51 tons of CO2 per year. She said the average American family of four put out 110 tons of carbon dioxide per year, and that within the county the target was for each resident unit to limit their output to 22 tons of C02 per year. The goal of course would be to reduce to zero. The Calculator shown above  asks the consumer the amount of consumption of various energy sources each family uses.


Mary Ann Gallagher of Briarcliff Manor CAC, noted the enormity of the task facing the home consumer in cutting carbon dioxide output. She said that each homeowner would have to plant 30 trees a year to offset one year’s worth of carbon dioxide emissions. (For those of you who remember eighth grade Biology, trees take in carbon dioxide during the process of photosynthesis, and turn it into oxygen. )


Gallagher suggested how carbon dioxide emissions could be limited by cutting lawns to 3-inch heights, leaving grass clippings on the lawn, creating a compost pile where organic garbage could break down into fertilizer to mulch plants. She suggesting sprinkling and watering only during evening hours and working with your landscaping caretaker, or if you do your own yardwork, cutting back on fertilizers and using more environmentally friendly methods to nurture your plants. Organizations and businesses that can help you with this are provided on the website explaining the plan, if not now, they soon will be, the panelists assured the audience.



Judy Martin of  Green Home Consulting.


On what the individual homeowner or apartment dweller or apartment owner or residential dweller can do, Judy Martin suggested the major effort would involve saving energy. She said the most effective measure homeowners can do immediately is install high efficiency insulation in their homes. Next, would be lighting (switching to LED or CFL bulbs) and hotwater use measures, and to target heating and air conditioning use. Air sealing and duct sealing was recommended. Recycling was encouraged. If a major home renovation was to be considered then it would make sense to examine solar energy, a new hot water heater, a new furnace and other measures.


The Global Warming Task Force was made up of 34 persons and they were assisted by over 70 volunteers with expertise in various areas. County Executive Spano, in his talk , referred to criticism the county had received for spending $100,000 to prepare the report with a business that had contributed to Mr.  Spano’s political campaign,  saying that “We did not pay them enough for the job they did. It’s not the money. The someone who has to ask that question: They don’t get it. It’s not about the money. If the effects of global warming occur, our expenses are miniscule.”


Ms. Berman said, “What we do in Westchester will have wide influence,” meaning Westchester would set an example for other counties to follow in reducing emissions.


It was unclear from the official part of the program WPCNR attended how progress would be monitored, whether the county would eventually put teeth into the program as they have with their mandatory recycling program, and how communities, businesses and residents would be monitored.


 

Posted in Uncategorized