Mr. Ryan advises sending Board of Elections Building Deal Back to Committee

WPCNR COUNTY CLARION-LEDGER. By John F. Bailey. March 11, 2008: In a vote scheduled for this evening on the county plan to purchase a building from a large political contributer to County Executive Andrew Spano, for the purpose of housing the headquarters of the Board of Elections, County Legislature Chair William Ryan of White Plains is urging fellow legislators to send the legislation back to committee for further study.


Mr. Ryan, speaking to WPCNR at 5:30 P.M., said the legislature discovered within the last 48 hours that according to a state law, the county cannot move the Board of Elections without a vote of the people. He said, in view of this, the county should not proceed with the deal to purchase the building. He said he was urging the legislators to not approve the proposal as it now stands.

Posted in Uncategorized

The Comptroller is Coming to Tarrytown. County Association Presents Tom DiNapoli

WPCNR FYI. March 11, 2008: The Westchester County Association, the organization of prominent business persons and public figures, will present New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli as part of a breakfast event from 8 AM to 10 PM on Monday, March 24 at the Doubletree Hotel,455 South Broadway in Tarrytown.


In a news release, the WCA noted that the organization invited Mr. DiNapoli to dicusse the impacts of the state budget on property taxes and the funding of infrastructure projects such as the Tappan Zee Bridge. DiNapoli will discuss those issues. The Comptroller recently, in a news release gave the opinion that private investment would be needed to cover such an expensive venture, expressing doubt that state bonding alone could fund the $15 to $25 Billion estimate of the bridge replacement, whatever it may be.

Posted in Uncategorized

The Parasites: You too Can Be a Party Hack-No Talent, Expertise Judgment Needed

WPCNR News Commentary. By John F. Bailey.  March 11, 2008:  This column was ready to go Monday morning. But, I thought, I’m being a little rough. There are a lot of good people in government Perhaps the column is just a little too cynical. So I held it back.


However, based on yesterday’s events, it appears I was even more naïve than I thought. In light of the New York State Governor’s indiscretions which he apologized for yesterday. The column was not harsh enough.


So here is that column adopted in light of the Governor’s sheepish apology yesterday, where he did not have the guts to take questions:


WPCNR was shocked…shocked by recent revelations that leaders of political committees use political committee contributions to pay for their cars, and many of their dinners.  I mean how amateur and naive have I been? What does a political committee chair do, anyway at any party level? Some appear very well-fed and well-dressed, I’ll admit. But who knew some chairs bill their parties for entertainment, transportation and the like?


Yesterday we learned that even the Governor was not beneath giving himself some perks on the wild side. How long has this been going on? 



Yesterday’s news that even Governor Eliot Spitzer, the “cleanest” of them all has feet of clay and is susceptible to the temptations that wealth and power may bring – that not so well-heeled folks would even dream about.


The governor just succumbs to those temptation(s) without giving it a second thought?


 Until last Friday when he got a phone call or a visit from “the men in black,” he appears to never have given whatever proclivities he indulged himself in a second thought.


Like, maybe it was wrong? Did you ever think it was wrong, Mr. Governor? Did you ever feel guilty while indulging? And how often did you indulge?


Say it ain’t so, Eliot. But you didn’t. You apologized. Like Steve Martin’s “Excuuuuuuuuuuuse me” routine. As if that excuses his behavior.


Since Eliot the Governor, appears based on the federal court papers (being leaked so tantalizingly to the salivating media) to have spent time more than once in dealing with a very expensive piece of talent, (I mean what do you get for $1,000 an hour?)  


Come on. Doesn’t the Governor have better things to do on his nights off – like reading up on the state budget, perhaps –  which he has shown he does not even understand, based on his first budget — or at least could he have studied the illegal alien laws before he proposed them?


No, maybe he was arranging his next extra curricular recreation. To him, is being governor just like running a fraternity or a college boys club?


Didn’t Bill Clinton have better things to do than hitting or allowing himself to be hit on by a young woman half his age – like maybe fighting terrorism? Had he fought terrorism instead of thinking about an intern on Mr. and Mrs. America’s dollar, maybe 9-11 wouldn’t have happened. (Cheap shot? No, it is not. Clinton was a big show. That’s all. They all are.) 


I have to laugh at the well-known attorney last night on television who suggested we pay far too much attention to the sexy episodes of people in power, indicating what they were doing was personal.


The point is missed. If you’re worrying about where your next pleasure hit is coming from, there’s something wrong with you. People depend on you to pay attention when you have the “Con.” (Navy talk for the helm).


I as a reporter, have to keep myself absolutely clean otherwise what would happen to my credibility – obviously if governors, Presidents, congresspersons, public elected officials and appointed ones are only worrying about their next libido lashing – then they are worrying about the wrong things.


They are children – whose ability to control themselves has not progressed beyond teen pornographic fantasies. But noooooooo, we should condone their reprobate libidinous weaknesses as “personal life.”


And what about the rest of the ugly news?


What do our party chairpersons, who’ve been revealed as receiving payments out of party funds,  do as Party Chairs anyway? Do they think? Do they strategize? Do they plot? Do they excoriate possible candidates? 


Apparently they like to eat dinner out a lot and drive around town “on party business” in big expensive cars that run contrary to the County’s new effort to lower CO2 emissions when they do eat dinner out.


But what party business do they do?


They apparently according to a story recently,  use contributions to the party for supposedly party benefit – theirs. The sums for expenses and tasks these chairpersons get are nice pocket change, up to $25,000 and up for various expenses political party chairs filed for with their parties.


This is  another example of “How to Make A Living in Government Without Ever Really Working.”


A county legislator our source quotes says the county will hire election workers this year to handle the fall elections, but says those who will be hired will be really “patronage.” These persons will presumably have experience in managing elections but they might not. If they are party hacks, they won’t have as much experience.


How incompetent can our governments get? Don’t ask. You don’t want to know.


Government Patronage is defined in the dictionary thusly: “The power to make appointments to government jobs on a basis other than merit alone.”


Let’s take a look at the benefits that come to you as a Party Chair.


I always thought when I was contributing to a party I was paying for phone banks, posters, brochures, polling, things that won elections or fought for truth, justice and the American Way.


But no, I am paying if I choose to contribute,  for lunches, car leases, oh, man – the noive  (as they say in Brooklyn) of these political parties.  Do they all do it, or just the party chairs in “rogue” “loosey-goosey” organizations?


I’d like to take politicians to lunch and ask them questions. Like how come my taxes are going up $1,000 a year and they are not cutting the budget? I have not seen one budget cut.


 I mean do we have to have party hacks go out to fancy-schmancy bistros to discuss political business? A smoke-filled room is much less expensive.


How about the parties give complete accounting of what they pay out and who they pay every penny to… every three months? That would be real election finance reform wouldn’t it?


Remember when the White Plains Democratic City Committee was almost evicted…and now meets at the YWCA? White Plains citizens have the right idea…give no money. Could White Plains be the only honest Democratic political committee anywhere? Other than cavalierly removing sitting councilpersons by not nominating them for a second term; other than nominating persons strangely connected to their county bosses they might be the most honest political committee anywhere, aside from the usual request for party loyalty at the cost of independence. But are they the most honest political committee around?


WPCNR wonders about taking the time to delve into this interesting sidelight. Who knew party chairs even got paid?  How slick is this? What a stupid thing.


I naively felt that party chairs, except of course on the national level did not get paid. I guess I was born yesterday.


Now Governor Spitzer’s shenanigans coming to light – he investigated prostitution rings as attorney general.  Was he patronizing high priced talent then? Did he compromise his investigations then?


 You who contribute to parties actually thought you were contributing to parties to elect officials and to crusade for truth, justice and the American Way, didn’t you?


I know, I feel stupid too. Used. The Eliot Spitzers, the Bill Clintons, the Gary Harts, the McGreeveys, the Mark Foleys, the Wilbur Millses disgrace us all. I mean when you look at the number of persons in government caught playing around you have to wonder, really wonder if they are really paying attention to the job or just the perks that come with it – the cash, the favors, regardless of what they are.


On other hand, maybe, just maybe the individuals named in the  party chair stories I originally wrote this column about are no longer pals with the county Democratic Party hierarchy.


Perhaps as one city official mentioned to me, “We used to have a saying when something happened to somebody like this. We’d say somebody dropped a dime on them.”


Just perhaps someone in power gave the paper a line of inquiry, I can hear it now, “Psst if you want a story you should investigate the money so-and-so takes out of the Democratic Party for expenses. Take a look at these.” Perhaps the documents detailing this party chair gravy train were slipped to the reporters. Believe me, it is very hard to get those kind of documents.  


Imagine, saying, “Hi, I’m the CitizeNetReporter,  could I have your financial records for the last six months?”


Which raises the question of how, all of a sudden Eliot Spitzer gets lit up like the Hindenburg.


I mean reporters follow Eliot Spitzer around all the time. Nobody noticed this behavior? If you’re really good at reporting you note things like how much the person you cover does not go home, how often he appears with his spouse, what he does with his family. You notice these things. Apparently nobody in media noticed — even when he was Attorney General.


However, the story on the party chairs, the governor’s apology Monday,  underline the hubris of the politicians involved.


The party chair chumps actually accounted for the expenses in writing. How dopey. Should be strictly cash boys. At least, according to the federal investigation of Spitzer, they point out Mr. Spitzer used cash. But whose cash? Money talks, nobody walks. Least of all the person who is getting a vehicle leased by the party. Are you kidding me?


Well, now we know better. Any individual who contributes one more dollar to any political party in this area is a damn fool.  The parties just use it to pay for parties, lunches, even their very own cars.


The subtle irony  is the revelation that well-heeled individuals contribute equally to both parties.


Who knew? Why do they do that? Do you think they may be expecting a benefit, no matter who is in power or gets elected?  Time to wake up and smell the bribery.


A Third Sewer System.


There is the sanitary sewer, the stormwater sewer, and now, there is the money sewer, where money flows to lawyers, architects, hangers-on, consultants, party workers, community leaders, and appropriately fawning individuals, and the occasional high priced service provider.


These are the individuals  who can “play ball” and be “team players,”  who are shifted into government jobs that require no work, just earnest public relations types who can say “You’re right, I’ll have to look into that” with conviction. That is just a few of the ways your tax dollars are used.


Breathe in the sweet reeking smell of patronage from the money sewer. It makes you sick and it is making our society sick and ineffectual.


When persons with no expertise get appointed to county departments for salaries  and benefits of $100G’s – that’s patronage.


When persons with no experience or knowledge of election law get hired to run elections – that’s patronage.


When political contributors get a global warming study contract – that’s patronage.


When judges court persons declare are incompetent are reappointed – that’s patronage.


But, instead of shaking our heads when we see that politicians do not work for you, dear citizen, and being outraged — we read, cluck our tongues and keep working and voting for  the same no talent hacks.


We explain it away, by saying that’s personal. A person is entitled to their private life no matter how sordid.


Baloney. Why do we do this?


Because the truth leaves too bitter a taste  to be swallowed. It is a bitter taste that lingers.


Politics exists for the party hacks, the politicians who burn money like it was nothing, and do nothing for it!  When they do things they spend too much for them and the systems don’t work.


They think they are entitled to spend our money and reward their friends, sycophants, paramours and contributors with no-show, no-do jobs, millions in contracts and projects. Because they are doing so much good.


When I think of the handwringing that certain organizations around town do when they need money, pleading for budget increases because they have shortfalls, and political parties plow out the money to individuals for parties, lunches, fundraisers, whatever, not to mention the sweetheart deals that make a gravy chain of well-connected professionals rich, it is sickening. It is immoral.


Politics is the profession of the professional parasite.


The professional parasite is the political hack. 


Who is the hack?


It is the no-talent buddy who sucks up and pledges loyalty to those in power. Those in power reward professionals, not very good ones with jobs that are not needed, giving positions to these “hacks” as rewards for tasks and what have you, and their loyalty.


What is a hack? A person with no self-esteem or courage, who leaches on and swims with  politicians and elected officials and is well-liked.  And will compromise principles on demand. Very important!


He or she survives like a human pilot fish eating the scraps that the party machine money sharks chew up and spit out.


The big shark (Mr. or Ms. P — the powerful elected politician in charge) gorges on the rich green of tax payer dollars in the money sewer chum.


He or she is indiscriminate in whether they are greenbacks of developers, contributions of citizens, but he or she loves tax dollars. They never met a tax dollar they didn’t like.


Remember this people next time you learn of community organizations about to shut down because of lack of funds.


Ask the Democratic or Republican Party to give them a penny out of their coffers. Ask a politician to give out of his war chest to help you out. 


 Have they ever? If they did please advise the CitizeNetReporter. I don’t think so. Not often.


Remember  next time the party invites you to a fund raiser. If you feel you must contribute, ask that you want a complete accounting to you in writing on what the dollars went for.


Why should you trust them?


They are your dollars, aren’t they?


But you do not understand. The politicians, the  leaders,  the people who run this city, county, state and federal governments and the school districts around the state do not think those dollars are yours.


They think it is their money that you have and that they should take it from you and spend it on themselves and their supporters because they are so much better and smarter than we are.


If they did care about you they would spend more wisely.


They really think that.


They are arrogant. Self-serving. Pathological liars.  


The “I never had sex with that woman” utterance by the former President Clinton, comes to mind.


Now we have Governor Eliot Spitzer’s apology today. Apology? Gee, I’m sorry.


Now, is he to resign? Probably not. Unlike some cultures who when disgracing themselves publicly commit suicide out of shame. American politicians have no shame. Their first thought is to protect their pension and their power.


The recent quote from one of our local leaders, County Executive Andrew Spano, addressing Governor Spitzer’s Commission on Property Tax Reform, is wonderful in demonstrating the pathological intent to obfuscate, to wit:


“In times like this, Westchester County government tightens its own belt by finding ways to reduce costs, trim expenses, and become more cost-efficient and effective. The one thing we don’t do is shift county costs down to our localities.”


Really?  Isn’t this a hoot?


This is the County Executive who has not lowered the tax increase he put in for2008 to maintain services in the face of what he thought was a sales tax shortfall. Since that time the sales tax came in much closer to predictions. Has he lowered the tax increase? What do you think?


 No. He has generated a nice little surplus with that little sleight of hand on the sales tax handle. His legislators went right along for the cash ride.


Chairman Thomas Suozi, who runs Nassau County and listened to Mr. Spano make that statement, must have had a hard time keeping a straight face.


I want to thank Executive Spano for providing such a great example of saying things that simply are poppycock, but sound so good.


What politicians say may be obviously untrue, but they think it is true and so to them it is not a lie.


We want to believe them. We so want to believe them that we do.


We accept when they say one thing and do another because we think they made “a tough decision” and did their due diligence.


This need for us to believe is the political hack’s ultimate weapon.


Us.


We want to believe our government officials are helping us and want to help us.


We so want to believe they care about us. That Hilary or Bill or Chuck or  Eliot or Joe and Andy love us and are working for us.


The reality of the incompetence that they represent, the lack of principles, is too sobering to contemplate for too long without feeling a sense of doom and dispair.


Especially when columns like this are written year after year, and it does not matter to the citizens who read them.


Forgive them, for they do not know whom they elect.

Posted in Uncategorized

Watt Job: Con Ed Jacks Juice Cost 57%. Passthru Pummels Populace. More on Way

.


WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. By John F. Bailey. March 10, 2008: Con Edison quietly raised the cost of electricity 57% as of the first of this year from 8 cents per kilowatthour (8.3400 cents) to 13 Cents  ( 13.16 cents)to  residential customers in Westchester County, for electrical heat customers it is slightly lower.


The 5 cent increase (4.82 cents specifically) needed no Public Service Commission approval.


 It was automatically passed through to customers, to cover the cost of the electricity Con Ed buys from suppliers, according to a Con Ed spokesperson, Alphonso Quiroz.



The increase may not be the last. The Public Service Commission today is hearing the matter of a requested increase in Con Edison’s Delivery Charge by $1.225 billion to help pay for infrastructure improvements.


Jim Denn, press spokesperson for the New York State Public service Commission told WPCNR, “The PSC regulates only the Delivery Cost, not the commodity cost, which reflects the change in the price of fuel.”


PSC Does Not Look at Suppliers’ Cost. Federal Government Does.


Asked if the Public Service Commission looked at Con Edison suppliers to assure they are passing along fair increases in the price of fuel to generate Con Edison electricity, Denn said the Public Service Commission did not oversee suppliers (creators of electric power), that they only acted in advisory capacity. He said the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission oversaw suppliers. He said he would followup with WPCNR to explain in more detail how the PSC participated in FERC regulation of supplier costs.


Denn noted that coincidently on this very day (Monday) the Public Service Commission was taking up approval of Con Edison’s most recent rate case, the request for increase in the Delivery Charge


More to Come?


The cost of the Delivery Charge per Kilowatthour this year has gone down 2 cents from 7 cents/kwh to 5 cents/kwh. However this still leaves the customer with a net 40% increase in their kilowatthour charge between the two usage charges (Supply Charge and Delivery Charge) that are calculated on kilowatt hours used.


Quiroz , speaking for Con Edison said the costs are passed on directly by Con Edison from the suppliers. He said Con Ed does not mark them up. Asked what was responsible for the 57% increase in supplier costs, Alphonse said it was “Due to other forces around the world and that’s (Con Edison) buying on the market.”


WPCNR asked Quiroz if Con Edison was attempting to use the least expensive suppliers and sources of electricity. He said he would find out and call WPCNR back.


School District Pays Less


The City School District, according to its Business Office is required by law to buy its power from the New York Power Authority, which WPCNR was told had lower rates for electricity.  The District will present its budget tonight in a public hearing called for a 4% increase in Utilities in its present Draft Budget of $184.8 Million. 


Curious, WPCNR  asked New York Power Authority Press Spokesperson Michael Saltzman where the New York Power Authority gets its electricity. He said they make it themselves and buy it from suppliers. He said he would get the cost per kilowatt hour the Power Authority charges for supply. Asked if the Power Authority uses different suppliers from Con Edison, he did not know.  He said he would get a list of energy suppliers the Power Authority uses, and how much their kilowatt hour prices had gone up.


County Does Not Monitor Electricity Makers


 The county, with the possible exception of Indian Point, does not monitor suppliers of electric power and their costs. Donna Green, a spokesperson for the Westchester County Department of Communications said the county does not maintain a list of electricity suppliers, and does not monitor their prices.


Regarding the Con Edison rate increase request in the delivery charge, County Executive Andrew Spano testified strongly against the Con Edison request  for an increase in the Delivery Charge in January, in a letter to Westchester consumers he wrote:


The proposal from Con Edison calls for an increase of approximately 33% on the delivery portion of its bills in the first year alone.  This would apply to all electric residential customers as well as businesses, non-profits, and governments in the Con Edison territory—irrespective of whether electricity is purchased from some other supplier.  Undoubtedly, this will have a huge impact on the electric bills that your business, school, and government agency will receive beginning April 1st.  …….


I believe this is the largest rate increase ever proposed by Con Edison—a company that already has the highest electricity rates of any investor-owned utility in the continental United States and one which has been plagued by outages and communications issues.  


Con Edison is now asking ratepayers to pay a cumulative increase of more than 60% in delivery fees over three years when the general inflation rate is approximately 2% a year.  By no measure is this “just and reasonable,” the standard the PSC has long used in setting new rates.  Conventional wisdom says that the PSC will reduce the requested rate, but I believe that nothing less than an 80% reduction is acceptable. (Frankly, no increase is acceptable but under PSC guidelines, utilities are allowed a “reasonable rate of return.”)


Doubling the Bill.


Viewed in the knowledge that the pass-along increase is 40% net and 57% overall, Con Edison is looking at a virtual doubling of the rates if the PSC approves the Delivery Charge in addition to the pass-along ability Con Edison has already quietly passed on to Westchester and New York area consumers.


Con Edison Profits Up.


Con Edison reported to shareholders earnings of $3.49 per share in 2007, compared to $2.96 per share in 2006.


This Saturday, Con Edison will pay a  58 cents per share dividend to common stockholders.


This is the 34th consecutive annual increase in the annual dividend for the Con Edison common stockholder.  Robert Hoglund, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer stated in January that the dividend “reflects our commintment to offering a tangible reward to those who have invested in our company for the benefit of our customers, while retaining the balance of our earnings to reinvest in our system.”


The news release announcing the dividend notes, “After the New York Public Service Commission’s ruling in Con Edison of New York’s pending electric rate case, which is expected in late March 2008, the company intends to issue its forecast of 2008 earnings.


The announcement of the kilowatt hour increase in the service charge was not noticeable in the January Con Edison bill, nor was it announced in the media, or by any Con Edison press release to this reporter’s knowledge

Posted in Uncategorized