Mayor Details Development Dividends in State of the City — City Hall Makeover-

WPCNR FOR THE RECORD. The State of the City 2008 Address Delivered by Mayor Joseph Delfino. April 7, 2008 UPDATED 2 PM WITH PICTURES: Here for closer review is the Mayor’s address to the Common Council and a citywide television audience Monday evening.



Mayor Joseph Delfino Delivering the Development Story at the Common Council Monday evening.


2008 State of the City


 


First on the agenda is the annual State of the City Address.


I’m very pleased to report that due to effective planning, efficient management and the collective efforts of my administration and the Common Council, the State of our City — in every respect – is sound and extremely strong.


 


Ten years ago, my administration put together a desperately-needed plan for the revitalization of White Plains.   Based on the principals of smart growth development, that plan has served as a blueprint for the benefits and successes we are now beginning to realize. 


 


 


 


By protecting the outlying neighborhoods and concentrating development in the downtown, and by working very closely with representatives of our City’s close-in neighborhoods, White Plains is now a vital and vibrant urban center while still maintaining the charming suburban quality of our residential areas.


 


I want to thank our neighborhood organizations for their input and cooperation in working to keep White Plains moving forward.  Their dialogue has been a major ingredient in the success of our revitalization.


 


White Plains is now in a fortified and solid financial condition.  Our City is now rated Aa1 by Moody’s Investors Service, the second-highest rating given by the investment community. 


 


White Plains is the only City in the State to enjoy such a rating.


 


The financial benefits of our new growth have been extraordinary.  In the downtown, once-vacant lots and abandoned buildings that previously generated less than $2 million in property taxes now generate close to $13 million in revenues, an increase of more than 650%.


 



White Plains has become the most desirable location in the region for major corporations and businesses.  This, from a city that in 1998, had an office vacancy rate of 34% — the highest in the nation!  Today, the rate has plummeted to less than 7%.  Vacant offices have been filled, raising the property values of these commercial buildings.  In fact, since 1998, the City’s full property value has increased an astounding 157%. (Editor’s Note: it was reported that the White Plains office vacancy rate has risen to 12.7% as of last week.)


 


Tonight, I can also report that for the first time in more than a half decade, White Plains assessment roles have increased, despite the fact that the majority of our new development – more than $19 million dollars – remains off our assessment roles because the City has still not been granted its own IDA.


 



I am convinced that millions of dollars in administrative fees that could have been used to offset property taxes for residents in the City of White Plains have gone to subsidize County government instead.  This is simply not acceptable.


 


I will continue to strongly advocate to higher levels of government that White Plains be granted its own IDA, just like Yonkers, New Rochelle, Mt. Vernon and every major community in Westchester.


 


Much of our new development has contributed to the diversity of our retail base, and that has had an enormous impact on our sales tax revenues which have reached a record high of $45 million.


 


In fact, the most startling statistic regarding sales tax revenues is the fact they have increased by more than 67% since fiscal year 1997-98, when I first took office as Mayor.


 



A report just released on the economy in Westchester by State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli noted that while the County’s population growth of 2.5% through the years 2000 to 2006 outpaced the rest of the State, White Plains’ growth was a full 7% during the same period.


 


So here in our great City of White Plains, we are at the vortex of incredible, positive change in every facet of our life as a community.


 


Always, my primary concern has been, is, and will continue to be, you, the residents of our City.  I have fought to keep your City taxes as low as possible.   White Plains is a unique City. Having maintained the suburban nature of many of our residential neighborhoods, we have always stood out as the County Seat and a major retail and business center.


 



We have worked hard and tirelessly to ensure that all our new development benefits the residential property taxpayer. An enormous statistic:  White Plains property taxpayers’ contribution to our general fund budget accounts for only 28.6 percent of the revenues of our budget – the lowest property tax contribution to any budget in the State of New York.  


 


Tonight, I want to address, specifically, a question that I know is on nearly every resident’s mind.  What are the benefits of our new development and how does it affect your taxes?


 



Let me begin by explaining that we collect nearly $13 million in new property tax revenues generated by new development. Of that $13 million, $8.3 million goes to the school system and the remaining $4.7 million is split, nearly 50 – 50 between the County and the City with a little more than $2 million going to each.


 


And yet it is the City that provides all the services to you, our residents.  It is the City that provides you with police and fire protection.  It is the City that picks up your garbage, plows your streets, and removes your leaves. 


 


I must ask: What is the County doing with their share of this new revenue for you, our residents?


 



Let anyone who believes new development has harmed our City, consider this fact:  At $20,000 – considered to be the cost of education for a student for one year – new development in the City is paying for the education of more than 400 students per year!  Data from the school district shows that the new development has only generated approximately 30 additional students.


 


Our City’s new development, itself, has generated substantial revenues in property taxes.  But there are additional, financial spin-offs of our new development which dramatically add to our revenues.  These additional sources of revenue offset costs without it then we’d be forced to raise property taxes in order to maintain the same level of services that you, our residents have become accustomed to.  For instance:


 



Building permits and fees – fueled largely by new development – generated more than $7 million in the last two years alone.  In 1998, building department fees didn’t even reach $1 million.  Without this essential source of revenue, property taxes over the last two years would have been increased by an additional 5%.


 



Then there’s our mortgage recording tax.  In 1998, it was just over $1 million.  In 2007, our economic growth propelled this revenue source to over $5.6 million.  Without this revenue growth, over the past 10 years, property taxes would be as much as 9.5% higher than they are today.


 



 


 


Our new development has also brought in direct user fees, such as parking.  This past year, parking revenues generated over $19 million – an increase of  $3.3 million from the previous year.  Without this additional revenue, we would have been forced to raise property taxes by another 8%.  Keep in mind that more than 65% of parking revenue is derived from non-resident use. 


 


It’s clear, when you look at these numbers, that our Smart Growth development program has meant a tremendous savings to property owners. 


 


The sales tax has always been a revenue stream that has traditionally helped off-set the tax burden on our residents. In fact, sales tax revenues – even without the quarter percent increase – have surpassed property taxes as the number one source of revenue for our City. 


 


Think about that for a moment.  We’d have to raise taxes by more than 40%, over the last 10 years, to generate the same revenues from our current sales taxes.


Studies based on IRS statistics bear out the fact that 90% of our sales tax revenue is generated by non-residents. 


 


Last year, I proposed raising our sales tax rate by one-half percent to equal that of the other major cities in Westchester. In the spirit of compromise with our Assemblyman Adam Bradley – I settled on a quarter percent increase instead and I applaud Assemblyman Bradley for his diligence in getting the increase approved by the Assembly and I our the State Senate to pass this quickly as possible.


 


Assemblyman Bradley has also promised to review the City’s finances with me on an annual basis and I believe the budget we’re releasing tonight makes it clear that there is a demonstrated need for the other one quarter percent. 


 


Had we received the full one-half percent I originally advocated for, it would have prevented any property tax increase and would have provided a small surplus that would grow year after year.  The shifting of tax burdens from the shoulders of our residents should be foremost in the minds of all your elected officials.


 


With that full one-half percent the White Plains sales tax


would be equal to, and not a penny more than, any of the


other major cities in the County, all of which, by the way, have their own IDA’s to generate additional revenues.


 


Think of how much property taxes would have to be increased if we did not have these other sources of revenue from new development.  We should keep this in mind as we continue our Smart Growth Development Program while carefully considering new development in the downtown.


 


Now, let’s shift our perspective for a moment.  Earlier, I spoke about our uniqueness as a City – a dual City that combines what’s best of urban life with what’s most celebrated as suburbia. 


 


It is most important for me to point out that it is the failure or refusal of other levels of government to recognize our uniqueness that is forcing our residents to pay an enormous price.


 


Because State government refuses to recognize our uniqueness as a major commercial AND residential community we are forced to comply with a bizarre and inequitable formula that costs you, the taxpayer millions of dollars.


 


Equalization Rate


 


The State attempts to balance the values of commercial and residential properties together with what is called an equalization rate.  I’m not going to get into the convoluted rational to try to explain how this formula works tonight.  Anyone who wants to learn about this can access the City website and read an excellent explanation of it by our Assessor called “Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Assessments.”


 


What I will say is that in communities where there is a fraction of the commercial properties that we have in White Plains, this formula might work.  It does not work, however when you consider that more than half, or approximately 59%, of White Plains properties are commercial.  With the current equalization formula, the State punishes White Plains for being successful.


 


We were forced to refund more than $4 million to commercial property owners in the last two fiscal years alone.  This is equal to an 11% tax increase. 


 


Does it make sense to anyone that we are forced to refund millions of dollars to corporations and businesses in a city where full values of properties have risen 157% and where vacancy rates have dropped by nearly 30%? 


 


The residential property taxpayer not only gets hurt by the fact that the City is forced to refund $4 million to commercial property taxpayers, but also because the assessed values of these commercial properties are then reduced as well. 


 


I stated earlier that the City assessment role grew for the first time in five years, and that’s clearly a remarkable achievement, considering that last year alone, we were forced to reduce our assessment role by more than $6.9 million due to commercial tax certiories caused by the State Equalization Rate. 


 


Tonight, I am releasing the City’s Budget for 2008-2009.  I am pleased to announce that there are no projected cuts in services to our City residents.  Spending this year is being held to a mere 3%, the majority of which is contracted salaries and benefits. 


 


Yet, despite that and the astonishing financial benefits of our economic redevelopment, there still remains a gap between revenues and expenditures.  This gap, largely brought about, unfairly, by the uniqueness of this great City, necessitates a 4.9% property tax increase over last year.


 


Despite the penalties of the State Property tax system, our redevelopment efforts have helped to off-set most of the negative impacts and fueled a number of quality of life initiatives that significantly benefit all our City residents.  Some initiatives began years ago, others in the past year. They include:


 


–         The creation and approval of 320 affordable residential units 


Our affordable housing program is one of the most aggressive in the region. White Plains was recognized by HUD as a national model program and this year we increased our required percentage of affordable units on new developments from 6% to 10%   My administration will continue to work innovatively for any opportunity to create even more affordable and workforce housing.


 


Our Computer Technology Centers at the Slater Center and the Youth Bureau where residents can learn computer technology and access the Internet have been enormously successful.


 


Throughout our downtown and in many neighborhoods we have worked to improve our public spaces. Our fountain plaza stands out as a model of what can be done through public/private partnerships.  In addition,


 


Our Streetscape Improvement Program has been a huge success.  I want to thank Senators Clinton and Schumer for their contribution of $1.5 million that enabled us to expand our downtown streetscape improvements to Lexington Avenue and Post Road. 


 


The White Plains Performing Arts Center, the result of another successful public/private partnership and now in its fifth year, has undergone a major transformation to become the County’s only professional regional theater. This year, the Performing Arts Center has successfully financed and produced three top quality Broadway level musicals, with its fourth and the season’s final show “How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying” opening April 24th.


 


The Performing Arts Center, one of the brightest gems in the downtown district, highlights and celebrates the diversity that is White Plains by partnering with the City of White Plains, White Plains School District, the Juneteenth Committee, Shinnyo En, and other community organizations to bring the performing arts to all our residents. (Editor’s Note: the city will furnish about $400,000 to the White Plains Performing Arts Center in monies and services in the 2008-2009 budget.)


 


When you consider our vast redevelopment activity, it is no small achievement that we have acquired or dedicated more than 53 acres to be preserved as open space.  We have procured all five parcels identified by the original Open Space Acquisition Committee which I formed in 2001, and I have recently convened a new committee to identify more parcels for potential acquisition.


 


White Plains has always been at the forefront of the Green Technology frontier.  Whether it be through the City’s use of hybrid vehicles, the green building technology requirements we impose on new development or the opening last year of one of only three Hydrogen refueling stations in the State, our City’s commitment to the environment has remained steadfast. 


 


To carry this commitment even further, I recently convened a new Green Technology Committee comprised of business and construction representatives, energy officials and City staff to discuss ways to further our commitment to preserving the environment.  


More than a think tank, the Green Technology Committee is results-oriented and committed to having a measurable impact on our community and its growth in the near future as well as long-term. 


 


Recently my office began a new Neighborhood Association outreach program.  Regular meetings are now being scheduled with my office, City staff and neighborhood association representatives so that improvements and suggestions can be coordinated and implemented. 


 


A handbook for residents of each separate close-in neighborhood is currently being produced and I look forward to a number of new initiatives to come from these meetings in the coming year.


Recently a new form has been added to the City’s website for residents to use for inquiries, problems, questions or issues of concern.  It’s on the front page listed as Questions or Comments.


  


For some time now, it has been apparent that major changes are required in the regulation of the City’s taxi services.  I have recently formed a committee comprised of City residents, representatives from the Business Improvement District, my office, Public Safety and industry officials to look at ways to improve service and increase oversight of this vital industry. 


 


I am renewing, once again, my administration’s commitment to continue revitalization efforts in the downtown, particularly along the Lexington Avenue and Post Road corridor.  Although this process has been lengthy, I believe the results will be stellar.  There is a core group of residents and businesses who have a strong interest in seeing this area redeveloped and we will continue to work closely with them in the coming year.


 


In our first venture in this area, our public private partnership with White Plains Hospital and the Kensington Assisted Living Facility to construct a new garage is well underway with the structure scheduled to be open in November in time for the holiday shopping season.


 


Trolleys


I’m also happy to announce that through the enormous and tireless efforts of many, including Melissa Lopez of my office, we have obtained funding commitments from the federal government and from the New York Power Authority to purchase two green technology trolleys to be deployed within the City – hopefully as early as this coming year.


 


I’m not happy to announce that a flood caused by a leaking pipe recently shut down City Hall for a day bringing to the forefront a challenge we’ve all known about for some time.  The flood destroyed some of our most important technological equipment and caused more than $500,000 in damages. 


 


City Hall


The cost to the taxpayers and the inconvenience of shutting down City Hall for a day is completely unacceptable. Ten years ago we began looking at the renovation and expansion of City Hall and decided to wait.  I am asking my staff to once again begin the process of accessing what is needed and how best to accomplish it.


 


Although City Hall sits on one of the most valuable properties in downtown, I believe it is the most appropriate location for it.  I am asking my staff to think creatively, and to look at every creative possibility including public – private partnerships or public – public partnerships that might produce the renovation and expansion we sorely need at little to no cost to the taxpayers.    


 


As always, there is much more to be done to manage our City effectively and well.  I want to first thank my family for allowing me to make the commitment to work 24/7 as your Mayor – it is a privilege and an honor to do so.  But it requires great sacrifice, and I thank my family for their continued understanding and support.


 


I also want to thank all of our City staff who goes above and beyond the call of duty – on a daily basis – to make this City a leader in everything it does.  I am particularly proud of the compassion and caring my administration has for those less fortunate and those in need of special consideration. 


 


When I see the outreach and goodwill, the conscientiousness, professionalism and expertise of my staff at City Hall, it truly makes me very proud. 


 


I have tremendous gratitude for our men and women who serve on the City’s police and fire departments and who have done a truly outstanding job putting major crime at its lowest point since the 1960s. With all our growth, this is truly remarkable. I want to give them a special thanks.


 


And, of course, I want to thank this council for all their hard work.  There is no question about their commitment to making White Plains the greatest City it can possibly be.


 


Looking ahead, I’m eager to deepen my partnership with this Council to sustain and maintain the level of growth that has kept White Plains at the forefront of the State and region and that has benefitted our more than 57,000 residents who depend on our leadership to provide the very best of services at reasonable costs.


 


I look forward to working with our Albany representatives once again to get the recognition of the State government regarding the uniqueness of the City’s tax base and allow a more equitable formula to be applied to reduce the burden on our City’s finances and to stop punishing our residential property taxpayers in favor of our commercial ones.


 


A solution does exist.  The State already recognizes the fact that New York City has a uniquely split commercial and residential property base and it allows that City to tax each entity separately – commercial and residential.  White Plains should be allowed to do the same.


 


In a City where nearly 60% of its properties are commercial, and where retail and office uses are so prevalent, sources of revenue – other than property taxes – must be vigorously pursued.  We will continue to work hard and creatively to ensure that residents are not subsidizing those who visit here to shop, work or enjoy entertainment. 


 


I pledge to continue my advocacy on the County level and on the State level for what I believe to be clearly in the best interests of our residents.


Thank You and May God Bless America.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Election Workers Needed for Fall Elections


WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2008. From Westchester County Board of Elections. April 8, 2008: The Westchester County Board of Elections is recruiting Poll Workers to assist in the important work of serving the voters at election districts across the County. This fall the need for more workers is critical because one new voting machine will be introduced at each polling place.

In order to guide voters through the electoral process smoothly and to ensure that all the polling locations are adequately staffed, the Board of Elections requires a full complement of Poll Workers. There is also a critical need for bilingual individuals fluent in Spanish and English to serve in all the Poll Worker roles.

 


 



The Westchester County Board of Elections is recruiting Poll Workers to assist in the important work of serving the voters at election districts across the County.

In order to guide voters through the electoral process smoothly and to ensure that all the polling locations are adequately staffed, the Board of Elections requires a full complement of Poll Workers. There is also a critical need for bilingual individuals fluent in Spanish and English to serve in all the Poll Worker roles.


This year we will begin to implement a new voting machine in every polling location throughout the County which will require additional workers.  


Poll Workers must be registered voters in the County of Westchester.  All Poll Workers must exhibit a professional and helpful demeanor and must be respectful and mindful of the voters.  Job responsibilities include, but are not limited to: opening the polls in the morning; hanging signs in accordance with legal requirements; checking parking and access for people with disabilities; directing voters to the correct polling location; verifying voters’ qualifications; signing in voters; serving voters and maintaining a record of the Election Day’s activities; assisting in removing signage; packing up election materials; and calling in results at the end of the day.

Stipends for various positions range from $225 to $250.  All Poll Workers must work from 5:30 AM until after the closing of the polls.  Prospective Poll Workers will be required to attend a mandatory 2 ½ hour training session, for which they will be paid $25, prior to working an election. Workers chosen to work as election coordinators or on the new voting machines may be required to have additional training.


Any one interested should contact the Westchester County Board of Elections at 995-5702 or 995-8568 for more information and to obtain a schedule of classes.


 


For more information contact:  Commissioner Carolee C. Sunderland 995-5703


                                                         Commissioner Reginald A. LaFayette 995-5705

Posted in Uncategorized

Tigers Nick NewRo Behind Sputo. Flooks, Coppola singles; Sandra’s Speed

WPCNR UPPER DECK. By Fastpitch Johnny. April 7, 2008:  White Plains Softball 2008 returned Monday afternoon and the Tigers after spotting New Rochelle an early unearned run, came from behind on back-to-back singles by  centerfielder Jackie Flooks and  hot corner picket, Christine Coppola in the Tiger 5th  to take the lead. They added an unearned tally in the sixth on an egregious messed up force play on catcher Sandra Mastrangelo at second by the New Ro shortstop who threw the ball too hard into right centerfield which allowed Sandra Mastrangelo to score the eventual third and winning run.



Fastpitch Nation: The Ladies In Black are Back with an all new infield: Kate Smayda at first; Christien Giansante at second, Christy Reina  at Short, and Christine Coppola at third. Sandra Mastrangelo is catching and Lauren Sputo is in the circle. That’s Kellie Washington on second base, who had New Ro’s only 2 hits.


Meanwhile in the circle, Lauren Sputo pitching strongly in the 40-degree temperatures fanned 10 Huguenots, walked 2 and struck out one allowing 2 hits, She closed out the game with a 1-2-3 seventh. The Tigers play Yonkers Friday in their next game.


 


The Tigers spotted New Ro an unearned run in the first and the Huguenot starter made it standup handcuffing White Plains until the fifth. In the fifth a lead off single in the hole by Sarah Lorden (2 for 3 on the day) started off the inning, then Sarah stole second her second of two steals on the day. After a strikeout and a walk to Laura DeMarte, Jackie Flooks  drove the ball on the ground sharply into the shortstop hole to send Sarah around with the tying run.


On the throw to the plate, DeMarte took second. Christine Coppola stood in and on a 1-2 pitch she blooped a Texas Leaguer pop into shallow left on the line. The Southeast wind drifted the ball into no woman’s land just beyond third base. The shortstop did not go for it. Indecision reigned. The leftfielder was too deep and the third baser did not go back for it. It fell and DeMarte came around to score to take the lead on excellent baserunning.


In the sixth, Mastarangelo singled sharply in the shortstop hole. After the next batter popped up, Sarah hit into a force play to short. Easy play. But no, the New Ro shortstop, formerly a thirdbaseperson threw too hard to second to get Mastrangelo on the force, nearly tearing the second baseperson’s glove off with her throw which sailed into right center. Mastrangelo got up and wheeled around third to score to make it 3-1.



Finishing them Off: Sputo wraps up her 2-hitter as Christine Coppola (No. 8) at third, who drove in the equalizer gets set.


Lauren Sputo needed that third run. In the sixth a wild throw into right center on an attempt at a double play from the plate allowed New Rochelle to climb within one. Ms. Sputo retired the next 4 Huguenots to close out the game and give the Tigers their first win.


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Tax Increase 4.9%. Smallest Budget Hike Since 02. Union Settlements Not Included

 


WPCNR COMMON COUNCIL-CHRONICLE EXAMINER. By John F. Bailey. April 7, 2008 UPDATED 12 Noon EDT, April 8, 2008: Mayor Joseph Delfino and his administration delivered the lowest budget increase since 2001-2002 Monday evening as the Mayor introduced the 2008-2009 proposed budget. However, because anticipated union contract settlements for 2008-2009 are not included in the budget, the budget may rise, apparently without further cost to the taxpayer. The anticipated union settlements are temporarily being funded by drawing down on the city fund balance.



Joseph Delfino, Mayor of White Plains delivering his State of the City address Monday evening.


 



The Mayor said the increase in the budget  spending is 3%, which yields a City Property Tax Increase of 4.9%.


For the  median White Plains home ($700,000 on the market) this yields a city property tax increase of $130, a total city tax of $2,750. The Tax Rate per $1,000 rises about $6  from $141.93 to $148.88/$1,000 of assessed value.


Plugging in the numbers for Mr. and Mrs. White Plains median homeowner, this means the total school, county and city tax for 2008-2009 (as predicted by WPCNR and White Plains Week two weeks ago) will be $12,650 made up as follows:


School Tax–  $7,500


County Tax–$2,400


City Tax– $2,750.


Total 2008-09 Property Tax on the $700,000 home: $12,650.


 


Residents should note half White Plains homeowners will pay more, half will pay less. Condominum Owners are taxed at 50% of the homeowner rate.


The City Budget book uses the example of a home accessed at  S15,000, and notes the average annual incremental property tax will increase $104.32 (or 29 cents a day).  A $15,000 assessed home is approximately a $575,000 home  in White Plains and will pay  about $224 in property taxes next year.


Budgeted Salary Increase Does Not Include 2008-2009 Union  Contract Settlements.


The increase in salaries in the new proposed budget is  2% year to year for General Fund, Library Fund and Water Fund 77.1 Million in 08-09 compared to 75.4 Million in 2007-2008.  According to the Budget Book,  “Salaries and Benefits in the FY 2008-2009 proposed budget  total $107.2 Million without consideration for merit, cost of living, union wage increases or vacancies.”


 The city had projected a 5% increase in salaries for 2008-2009 to the state.  Employee Benefits go up 5% from 35.3 Million to $36.8 Million in the Proposed Budget. A sales tax increase of ¼% making its way through the State Senate at this time may be the anticipated source to fund additional salary costs resulting from the renegotiation of union contracts with the Police, Fire, Teamsters and Civil Service Employees Association, due to expire June 30, 2008.


Romancing the Ritz Stone.


In other action Tuesday evening, the Common Council voted not to sell the median on Renaissance Square to LC Main, LLC, the Louis Cappelli organization (currently containing a Ritz-Carlton marble marker). This despite Mr. Cappelli’s representative Mark Weingarten cautioning the Common Council this action would be considered “arbitrary and capricious.” After the vote was taken Mayor Joseph Delfino expressed , the Council felt so strongly on the presence of the Ritz stone marker and offered the Council an opportunity to reconsider the vote or express interest in discussing how the Ritz Carlton might make the traffic island safer, which was the council’s main concern. The council declined the Mayor’s effort at keeping “island diplomacy” in play. The Mayor told WPCNR he had no idea at this time when Cappelli Enterprises would be directed to remove the Ritz Carlton stone and make improvements to the island’s curb.



Mark Weingarten, Louis Cappelli’s legal counsel, demonstrating photographs of signs on city property which advertised private establishments like The Galleria and Westchester Mall.



The Ritz Stone shown on the disputed traffic island at left of picture. The Council voted not to sell its space to Cappelli Enterprises, opting for possible removal of the stone because of liability and safety issues. The stone was erected with city blessing on a request by the Ritz Carlton made to Louis Cappelli, the developer, according to the Mayor.


Weingarten said that Louis Cappelli feels that asking him to remove the Ritz-Carlton sign was a pesonal insult to him (Cappelli). Weingarten characterized the Council effort to remove the stone (which reads “Ritz-Carlton” and occupies the traffic island on Renaissance Square), could be considered “arbitrary and capricious” on the part of the Council. Each member of the council took grievous umbrage at this characterization and proceeded to vote 6-1 to  not sell the area the stone occupies to Mr.Cappelli.


 


Shock at Perceived Extension of Affordable Housing Deadline.


The council also expressed shock that Cappelli Enterprises was asking the Council to extend the site plan for building affordable housing at 240 Main Street until April 7, 2009. Rita Malmud and Dennis Power and Benjamin Boykin each demanded an explanation as to why the deadline for building the affordable housing Mr. Cappelli owes for 221 Main and the City Center was being extended, and appeared appalled that the letter admits Mr. Cappelli has “not actively engaged our subcontractors to move forward.”


What the council did not appear to grasp was that this request was an extension of a site plan approval, not a request to extend the deadline for the building of the affordable housing Cappelli owes. Without extension of the site plan, the Council could be, in effect, killing the affordable housing project for good, whether they realize it or not. The backup material clearly states the request is merely for an extension of the plan. It does not make any request to untie the affordable from the 221 Main condominium tower agreement in effect. 


State of the City.


 



In the Mayor’s State of the City message, he called the city “sound and extremely strong… vital and vibrant.” He made a strong case that the development over the last seven years has been very good for the city, and has mitigated property tax increases, citing a series of comparisons, leading up to his announcement of the tax increase and conservative increase in spending compared to the county (4.4%) and the school district(5.7%). He also declared his intention to refurbish City Hall, and explore possibilities to restore the grand old lady of 255 Main Street to her former glory. He also announced the purchase through a grant of two trolleys which will begin service in the downtown in 2008.


 


In 2001-2002, when the City Center was approved (September, 2001), the city budget was $97.7 Million. It was just about that a year earlier in 2000-2001. The tax rate was $91.48/$1,000 of assessed valuation. The year 2001-02 was the second straight year of no tax increases.


Seven years later, the 2008-2009 Proposed Budget last night is $161.7 Million, with a tax increase of 4.9% .  The city budget has grown 66% —  $64 Million in 7 years, an average of $9.1 Million a year. What cost $97.7 Million to buy in 2002, would cost $114.8 Million today. By that measure, the city budget has increased at a rate 40% more than the rate of inflation. Inflation has run about 3% a year over seven years.


In his State of the City Speech, the Mayor described the budget as having no cuts in services, and a rise year to year of 3%. According to the actual budget book, the budget actually rises 4.6% over “this year’s adopted spending plan,” and “4.35% TO $151.1 Million” in the general fund.


The Budget Book explains the 3% increase announced by the Mayor this way:  “When spending is compared to the city’s 2007-2008 revised budget,  the year over year increase in spending is $4.5 Million, or 3%.” The revised budget, WPCNR believes, is the savings achieved during the year, as cutbacks are made, but this needs to be checked out.


Albany Don’t Fail Us Now.


If the city should increase union contracts  later this year 5% as they call for in the 2008-09 projection to New York State, the budget will increase the salaries of the four unions about $5.3 Million. The anticipated sales tax revenue of 1/4% more enroute to White Plains if the State Senate approves it — will generate about $6 Million — enough to cover the union contract settlement of 4 to 5


Romancing the Fund Balance for $11.3 Million for Salaries, Open Space, State Aid.


Delving deeper into the budget book Wednesday morning, WPCNR notes the budget in the interim is being balanced by $11.3 Million from the city’s fund balance.


To wit, on page I-9, union increases anticipated to be awarded in new contracts, are covered thusly: “Full-time positions were budgeted according to current labor contracts; a provision for salary agreements that have yet to be settled was included in the Reserve for Financing” ($6.1 Million).


The Budget Book, separately on page I-38 gives the detail of how useful the city Fund Balance (about $28.9 Million) is. The city draws on it each year, anticipating future revenue sources, then replaces it when those revenue sources come true.


The strategy this year is to draw $11.3 Million, the book explains on Page I-38:


This includes $10 Million from the undesignated fund balance, $1 Million from designated fund balance for tax certioraris, $1.6 Million from the fund balance designated for open space (purchase) and $1.7 Million in anticipation of the increase in state aid….If the City is granted authorization to increase its sales tax revenue by 1/4%  by the New York State Legislature in fiscal 2008-2009, the City’s anticipated use of fund balance in fiscal year 2008-2009 will decrease significantly.


 


In a final note, the Venue project had its hearing continued until May 5.


The council also demanded noise reports on cabarets in the city, by law which have not as yet been delivered, even though Councilwoman Malmud has been asking for them for three months.


 

Posted in Uncategorized