Hockley’s Last Stand: Challengers Fail Across 27/29 Districts.Dem Leaders Roll

WPCNR CAMPAIGN 2008 By John F. Bailey at Democratic City Committee Headquarters, 120 Bloomingdale Road, September 9, 2008 UPDATED midnight with Board of Election Results: “That’s what we do best is work together,” said John Kirkpatick, newly elected Democratic District leader as jubilant Democrat Leaders celebrated an across-the-Board sweep of 27 of 29 contested Election Districts in the city in Tuesday evening’s rare Democratic City Committee District Leader Primary Election brought about by an effort by some 52 “challengers” seeking to replace longtime incumbent Democratic Leaders.



Democratic City CommitteeeCo-Chair  Liz Shollenberger Posting the Big Numbers


The challengers, mostly sympathetic to Councilman Glen Hockley, lost badly as an estimated 20% of Democratic Registered voters turned out. Benjamin Boykin, City Councilman said of the result to WPCNR, “The Democrats of this City have sent Glen Hockley a message. His run is over.” (It is widely expected that Mr. Hockley will not be renominated to run for Common Council again, or for Mayor, as a result of this challenge he mounted._)


The vote was close in only 4 districts: 15 (from North Street west to Mamaroneck Avenue),16 (Ferris Avenue east to Cottage Place), 20 (Woodcrest Heights)  and 32 (portion of Battle Hill).


Only one Challenger  appeared to have won, Yvonne Taylor, and that was in doubt since she was only leading by one vote pending counting of 3 paper ballots. In the other district, where Challenger John Lanman was tied with District Leader Victoria Presser, a tie is decided by the majority, according to Mr. Sharp, therefore meaning that Lanman, should results hold would most likely be whisked out by the overwhelming majority returned and voted into party office tonight.



Tim Sharp, Co-Chair of the Democratic City Committee attributed the stunning victory to getting the message out: “The key was that people came to understand this was a primary about nothing of any importance. It was all about Glen Hockley only and his ambition.”


Before a jubilant crowd of District Leaders assembled who had come in reporting results from their districts, Elizabeth Schollenberger, Co-Chair complimented Steve Wallfish for first bringing the primary threat to he Democratic Party’s attention and thanked David Buckner for providing the computer expertise and advertising creavity to craft the party’s media campaign that informed the Registered voters.  The crowd included Assemblypersons Adam Bradley and Amy Paulin, State Senator Suzi Oppenheimer, Assemblyman George Latimer, Councilpersons Benjamin Boykin, Dennis Power, Milagros Lecuona and Rita Malmud. Mr. Hockley was not present.


As of 10:30 this evening, 27 districts were won outright by Democratic City Committee-endorsed District Leaders with District 20 and District 32 in doubt. Even Glen Hockley, the leader of the “Challenge movement” dubbed by Democratics, the “Republicrats,” alluding to many of the Hockley sympathizers having been former Republicans, went down to defeat by a 3 to 1 margin, losing to Ellen Blauner and Deborah Ziph by a 3 to 1 margin. Democrats gleefully pointed out to WPCNR that Hockley, now no longer a district leader, would not be able to vote in the party’s reorganization meeting next Wednesday, September 17.


Asked about how the now-united Democratic City Committee would go about choosing whom to run against Mayor Joseph Delfino in next year’s Mayoral election with five candidates: Adam Bradley, Bill Ryan, and Councilpersons Benjamin Boykin, Rita Malmud and  Dennis Power obvious contenders, Paul Schwarz said the Nominating Committee as has been custom would make the decision from among those who express an interest in running.



Architects of Hockley’s Last Stand: Tim James and Mrs. James, Liz Shollenberger, Co-Chairs of the Democratic City Committee


The Results as Reported by the Westchester County Board of Elections:


 UNOFFICIAL RESULTS FROM THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS   


*** Indicates Democratic City Committee Leader Candidates.













































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 01    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ALISON E GREENE*** 95 39%
DEM ELEN GUAGENTI TAX 27 11%
DEM OREN J TEICHER*** 98 41%
DEM STEVE GREEN 22 9%
  Office Totals 242 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 02    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM JOHN D SULLIVAN 13 9%
DEM JOHN M MARTIN*** 56 39%
DEM MARSHA A SULLIVAN 15 11%
DEM PAULINE C OLIVA*** 58 41%
  Office Totals 142 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 03    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM BRUCE S HANDLER 4 6%
DEM CHERYL J BRADLEY*** 27 44%
DEM THADDEU KUCZINSKI*** 28 45%
DEM WILLIAM D FRUMKIN 3 5%
  Office Totals 62 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 05    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ANTHONY CIARAMELLA 20 14%
DEM LINDA Y LANDESMAN*** 61 44%
DEM MARK A GUTERMAN*** 59 42%
  Office Totals 140 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 06    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM CAREY E GOULDNER*** 67 47%
DEM ERIC M SANDERS 8 6%
DEM STEPHEN B WALFISH*** 69 48%
  Office Totals 144 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 07    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ADRIENNE PINCUS 20 9%
DEM BEN BOYKIN II 84 39%
DEM FRANK PANDOLFO 25 12%
DEM JUSTIN C BRASCH 87 40%
  Office Totals 216 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 09    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM DOROTHY L DICINTIO 55 45%
DEM GARRY R KLEIN 6 5%
DEM MAX F HOCKLEY 4 3%
DEM RIENA KAPLOW 56 46%
  Office Totals 121 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 10    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ADAM T BRADLEY 82 48%
DEM DOUG S RUTTENBERG 22 13%
DEM WILLA R SWILLER 66 39%
  Office Totals 170 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 11    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM DAVID AZRIN 43 49%
DEM STUART STANDARD 8 9%
DEM SUSAN L ZILBER 37 42%
  Office Totals 88 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 12    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM CHERYL COVE 23 13%
DEM DANIEL R SEIDEL 67 38%
DEM JOHN KIRKPATRICK 67 38%
DEM ROBERT J COHLAN 21 12%
  Office Totals 178 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 14    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM BARBARA SCHWARTZ 92 45%
DEM RACHEL ECKHAUS 9 4%
DEM RITA Z MALMUD 92 45%
DEM VALENTINA MANCUSO 13 6%
  Office Totals 206 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 15    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ABBE D GOODMAN 29 23%
DEM CAROLINE KYZIVAT 34 27%
DEM GERALD P GOODMAN 23 18%
DEM WILLIAM BROWN JR 40 32%
  Office Totals 126 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 16    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM JUDITH A ROSS 23 24%
DEM NANCY M YANOFSKY 24 25%
DEM RHODA W FIDLER 25 26%
DEM STEPHEN H ROSS 24 25%
  Office Totals 96 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 17    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ANDREA REED 32 42%
DEM JESSICA R VARGAS 35 45%
DEM ROCCO R PERROTTA 10 13%
  Office Totals 77 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 18    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ELIZABETH P ROACH*** 66 45%
DEM JEREMY S KASMAN 10 7%
DEM THOMAS M ROACH JR*** 71 48%
  Office Totals 147 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 19    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM FRAN H KATZ 31 24%
DEM MAUREEN M COHEN*** 57 44%
DEM ROBERT L HOCH*** 41 32%
  Office Totals 129 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 20    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ERIC K MORGAN*** 31 24%
DEM JEROME A CONTEE 26 20%
DEM THOMAS CARUSO JR*** 41 32%
DEM YVONNE E TAYLOR 32 25%
  Office Totals 130 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 21    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM FERNANDO A CORTES 23 19%
DEM GEOFFREY D SMITH*** 38 32%
DEM HARRIS A LIEBER 22 18%
DEM SAUL M YANOFSKY*** 36 30%
  Office Totals 119 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 23    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM DEBORAH W ZIPF*** 36 38%
DEM ELLEN C BLAUNER*** 38 40%
DEM GLEN S HOCKLEY 11 12%
DEM TAPANI TALO 9 10%
  Office Totals 94 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 24    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM CHERYL C MELTON*** 56 42%
DEM STACEY S SPENCER 29 22%
DEM ZELLE W ANDREWS*** 47 36%
  Office Totals 132 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 27    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM CAROLYN ABRAMOWTZ*** 43 43%
DEM GLENNA B DUGGAN 9 9%
DEM JAMES DUGGAN 4 4%
DEM WILLIAM J RYAN*** 44 44%
  Office Totals 100 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 28    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM AKIMA C WATTY 9 12%
DEM JAMES MAZZONE*** 38 51%
DEM JOHN H AVERILL*** 28 37%
  Office Totals 75 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 29    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM HENRY T FERLAUTO 22 20%
DEM MONIQUE G GUIDRY*** 45 41%
DEM TONY P OFFURUM*** 42 39%
  Office Totals 109 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 32    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM JESSICA LUCIANO 28 23%
DEM JILL C OWENS*** 32 26%
DEM JONATHAN LANMAN 31 25%
DEM VICTORIA PRESSER*** 31 25%
  Office Totals 122 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 33    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM AMY M MCCANDLESS 17 11%
DEM ARNOLD STREISFELD 21 13%
DEM IRENE A THOMPSON*** 70 43%
DEM LYDIA P BARKLEY*** 54 33%
  Office Totals 162 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 34    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM CHARLES MORGAN*** 48 44%
DEM RAYMON INDELICATO 33 30%
DEM VICKI LARREYNAGA*** 29 26%
  Office Totals 110 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 37    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM JAMIE F BAKER 15 14%
DEM LIZ SHOLLENBERGER*** 45 43%
DEM TIM JAMES*** 44 42%
  Office Totals 104 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 39    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM ERIDANIA CAMACHO*** 43 42%
DEM LUCAS A SCIMIA 20 19%
DEM VICTOR AVENDANO*** 40 39%
  Office Totals 103 100%

Office   COUNTY COMMITTEE – WHPL 42    
  VOTE-FOR-TWO    
PARTY 1 Districts out of   1 Reporting (100)% Votes Percent
0 Absentee Votes Cast
DEM DENNIS J POWER*** 98 37%
DEM KAREN M PASQUALE*** 88 34%
DEM MARK I SIRKIN 35 13%
DEM MELODY S HOCKLEY 41 16%
  Office Totals 262 100%

Posted in Uncategorized

Wood: LCOR has Paid City Its Tardy $5 Million. LCOR has “Other Finance Sources”

WPCNR THE DEVELOPER NEWS. September 9, 2008 UPDATED 2:45 P.M. E.D.T.: City Hall reported to WPCNR this afternoon that LCOR has paid the city the $5 Million it previously was in default on  since June 30, when it failed to pay the second installment on the land for their 55 Bank Street project.  


The issue was raised by broadcast reports said Lehman Brothers, the investment banking firm,  long touted by LCOR, the developer of the 55 Bank Street affordable housing project as their source of financing of the 80-20 affordable housiong $350 Million  project, that Korean Development Bank, the firm expected to provide a badly needed cash infusion to Lehman Brothers, has withdrawn their interest, creating a cash bind for the Lehman Brothers firm. This could conceivably rule out Lehman financing all or a portion of the LCOR White Plains Project.


Paul Wood, White Plains Executive Officer, in response to WPCNR inquires, reports LCOR paid White Plains the tardy  $5 Million  plus $9,000 interest that was due June 30, and had not been previously received, having been held in escrow. Wood told WPCNR the money was paid the city approximately August 15.


Asked how the Lehman Brothers troubles might affect the ability of LCOR to go ahead on the project, Wood said LCOR had “other financiers. You’d have to aske them.” Asked if he would be contacting LCOR to see how their financial sources shaped up, Wood said he thought he would. Wood indicated the project was still on, regardless of the Lehman Brothers situation.


Previously LCOR had been holding $5 Million in escrow as payment for the second installment on the land which the city sold them to build the project upon on Bank Street.


For a more detailed look at the Lehman Brothers situation, visit Marketwatch at http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/lehman-tumbles-fears-over-raising/story.aspx?guid=%7B4389ABCB%2D2381%2D417D%2DA426%2D5EE9B2C1946E%7D&siteid=aolpf1&icid=snap-nws

Posted in Uncategorized

Con Ed’s Kilowatt Hour Price Hits 25 cents — UP 65% Since December!

WPCNR THE POWER NEWS. By John F. Bailey. September 5, 2008:  Con Edision has raised the price of electrictiy 65% in eight months. The Consolidated Edison charge per kilowatt hour has hit an all time high in August, rising 21% to 25.4 cents per kilowatt hour for Supply and Delivery charges combined on the typical Westchester bill.



The 25.4 cents is rapidly approaching the 28 cents predicted by the Con Edison media relations department to WPCNR, back in June. August cost  of 25.4 cents  is up from 21 cents a kilowatt hour in July and 19.45 cents in June.


Con Edison told WPCNR last month they had been able to keep the price down in July due to the efforts of their energy buyers, but apparently the runup in oil this summer has taken its toll, Con Edision includes this explanation in the current electric bill for August:



“You’ve heard about rising energy costs. Sharp increases in the cost of oil, natural gas, and other fossil fuels have driven up the cost of producing the electricity that Con Edison buys for you and delivers to your home.” Con Edison’s flyer predicts summer 2008 (June-September) bills to be approximately 22% higher than summer 2007.


However, in 8 months, the Con Edison has raised the cost of electricity to Westchester consumers from 15.4 cents per kilowatt hour to 25.4 cents — a 65% increase — substantially higher than the cost runup of oil the last eight weeks.


In

Posted in Uncategorized

Schools Open Thursday. Projected Enrollment Up 5% Over Long Term Projection

WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. September 3, 2008 UPDATED 7:05 P.M. E.D.T.: White Plains schools open Thursday morning, expecting a projected enrollment of 7,123  students from Pre-K through high school, 5% ahead of previous long term projections for 2008-2009.  The enrollment level of 7,000 students was not anticipated to be approached until 2010-11, according to school projections in 2005, when it was estimated by Bishop Associates to be 6,914. Now White Plains has bypassed that level three years earlier than expected


WPCNR notes that previously issued long-term district projections predicted the White Plains District as having 6,775 students in 2008-2009, as follows – 2,800 in k to 5, 1,400 in Middle School and 2,000 in the high school, and 575 in Special Education.


The projection for 2008-2009,  according to the school calendar just published shows  the population of K Through 5, Middle School and High School  running 5% ahead of that projection, in the grade schools, Middle and High Schools at 6,620 plus 215 enrolled in alternative programs, 198 in PreK and 90 in Out-0f-District programs for a total of 7,123. This is a 5% increase in enrollment from previously projected  – the bulk of that coming in Pre-K, or course.


Three years ago (2006-2007) the White Plains enrollment was 6,784 students. Last year, the total was 7,041, an increase of 4% in enrollment  and the projection for 08-09 is 7,123, a 1.1% increase. 


A slight worry.


If the district continues to miss its previous projections by a 5% margin the enrollment in the White Plains Schools will reach 9,543 students by 2014-2015, raising the spectre of the need for one new elementary school, in addition to the new Post Road School now being built, and perhaps another addition to the high school if the projections of the school continue to be 5% off.


 The projection for 08-09 was 6,775 students which was reached two years ago in 2006-2007. The projection fo 2014-15 by the school projections assumes flat growth in enrollments at Middle School and High School, with an increase of 300 students at the elementary level to a total of 7,400 students by 2014-15. 


Actual enrollment figures will not be available until October, according to Michele Schoenfeld.


So far this year,  elementary Schools enrollment is up by 42 students (1.3%). High School enrollment is down by about 11 students. Middle School is down by 16. Alternative Program, PreK and Out-of-District Placement students is up by 16 students.


By now all parents should have received their school bus notifications from the district. Bus transportation is provided up through eighth grade. The cost per one way trip by bus to the high school has increased from $1.25 to $1.50 per trip, with a 20 “One Way” trip booklet available for high school students for $23, up from $20 last year.

Posted in Uncategorized