Tell the City Leaders What You Consider Important

WPCNR VOICE OF MR. AND MRS. AND MS. WHITE PLAINS. December 27, 2008: In the interest in focusing on issues as the city enters 2008, the economy and the alarming increase in property taxes that city residents face in the coming year, have created some issues that the city and the school district leaders perhaps should be paying more than lip service.


I have isolated a few of them at the right, and offer them up to get the public take on them. Simply vote in terms of priority in your mind. The issues should purely be considered from what would White Plains benefit the most from to keep the city “moving forward” as our officials love to say as an excuse for not doing anything about disturbing trends.  You may vote for more than one issue, voting once each day.


Here they are:


REMOVE THE GEDNEY DUMP CANCER-CAUSING TOXINS NO MATTER WHAT– According to the Department of Environmental Conservation, the DEC has determined that White Plains is going to have to remediate the TCE carcinogens leaking into the Mamaroneck River.


The form of that remediation has not been decided yet, but the key decision has been made, it has to be cleaned up. City officials have ignored this problem since 1976 when first discovered. Should the TCE’s be removed anyway, regardless of whether the DEC is lenient in determining the scope of their remediation?


Cut the City Budget 5% ($8 Million) — As pointed out exclusively by WPCNR in the last week, the city, school and county property taxes are escalating to where persons living on incomes not pacing the 4% city tax increase of last year, are rapidly having their taxes outpace their growth in income. If they are on fixed incomes and own homes, more could be at risk of defaulting on their mortgages. 


The rate of tax increase for a median home in White Plains for city and schools approaching $2,000 to $2,500 increased taxes a year in 2008-2009  (In five years this will amount to your paying $10,000 more in taxes over what you pay now if the present budgets kept on their meandering 4%, 7% a year increases.


Should the city cut its budget by 5%  ($8 Million)? A former Executive Officer of the City of White Plains estimated that for every $1 Million in expenses the tax rate would have to go up 3%. An $8 Million cut  would result in an 25% reduction in city taxes.


Cut the School Budget 5% ($9.2 Million)– It is intriguing that the School District is eliminating the Annual Budget Committee review of their budget this year and calling just two public forums to have the public participate in forming the budget. This is like having callers to WFAN manage the New York sports teams. This should be an interesting exercise. 


As a target, would the city citizens want a 5% budget cut (a mere $9.2 Million), which would enable the district to keep the budget under $190 Million? That would cut the school tax increase (at the current rate of spending to less than a $100, instead of the $500 increase you received this year if you owned a $700,000 home. It is a target.


Lower Parking Rates. Extend Meter Time Limits. Lower Fines — We, those trapped in White Plains, are used to the Draconian conversion of the Department of Parking into a profit center. Should the rates lower a little to 50 cents an hour instead of a dollar an hour? With higher ticket rates? Should it all be reexamined in light of a shrinking economy? Would lower parking keep White Plainsians shopping in White Plains instead of going to Port Chester where my wife is now, shopping with her daughter? Would citizens respond to lower rates? Or should we keep them where they are? Raising them is another possibility to lower taxes. But the question here is, should they be lowered. If you agree vote in poll at the right.


City Takeover of Illegal Housing Sites — The city has paid lip service to the illegal, overcrowded tenement houses owned by modern day Uriah Heeps, Dickensian  flouters of zoning laws, apparently allowed to exist because many of them may be major political contributors to both parties.


Should the city, when a landlord’s property is found to be in violation of housing standards, initiate a takeover of the property, compensating the landlord for the property but taking it over and becoming the landlord? The landlord of course, being paid the assessed value of the house? It would assure that residents would not be gouged and landlords be deprived of their ill-gotten profits off the poor. What does Mr. and Mrs. White Plains think? Of course, political contributions would decline.


EXAMINE OVERCROWDING OF WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOM, Bring in Greenwich Hospital Expertise, New Facility.— Due to obviously misguided efforts by the health officials, allowing  the closing of  United Hospital in Port Chester and St. Agnes Hospital as losing money, White Plains Hospital Medical Center has been embarking on a never-ending expansion program to handle the health load.


This has been good for White Plains Hospital but possibly not so good for sick persons. 


 This has created perpetual crowding at the E.R., plus longer ambulance runs from surrounding communities. Should the city work to involve Greenwich Hospital in splitting the emergency room load or establishing a Westchester satellite Emergency room closer to White Plains?  Many White Plains and surrounding communities choose Greenwich Hospital for ambulatory and elective procedures. Why not ease the White Plains Hospital Medical Center crowding with a plan instead of an expansion into a mega-emergency room that will probably not be able to handle the patient load when completed?


Establish City Commuter Tax — The city is desperate for revenue with sales taxes softening perhaps due to the economy.  There is also a definite possibility that the assessments will be down this year causing a catastrophic loss in assessed property. Last year it was even, thanks to the last gasp of the housing market boom.


Real estate is down 10% in White Plains this year. IF assessments decline10%,  this will be a disaster from a property tax standpoint. The last time the city assessments dropped approximating 10% was in 1994-1995 when assessments dropped 8.1% from $390 Million to $359 Million.


Last year the city assessments were $290.2 Million. A  10% drop with mean a $30 Million drop in assessments  to $260 Million. 


This would cause the school district to raise their tax rate to $560/ $1,000 of Assessed Value, from $503/$1,000 of Assessed Value this year to generate the same $145 Million in property taxes they’re receiving this year on their $184.4 Million Budget. They raise that one dime, and the increase per thousand will be more. This would mean that Lloyd Tasch, the city assessor becomes the most important man in White Plains over the next 35 days.  (All the more reason to cut the rate of growth dramatically in the 2009-2010 School Budget.) 


As a perpetual revenue shot, should the city install a commuter surcharge payable to the city by persons working in White Plains who are not residents? With a population we are told that swells by several hundred thousand during the workday a $100 a year Commuter Tax on 150,000 workers living outside of White Plains would generate  $15,000,000. A $200 Year Commuter Tax, $30 Million. This could be split with the School District. Should this be explored?


Establish Commercial Services Tax to Penalize Certiorari Filings — Because a separate Commerical Tax Rate legislation proposed by Assemblyman Adam Bradley has been stalled in Albany, because the senate will not pass it, according to Mr. Bradley and State Senator Suzi Oppenheimer. 


The city might consider, as Polk County Tennessee has done in dealing with unfairly low assessed properties on government lands, imposing a Commercial Services Surcharge across all businesses and business loaners in the city, with the option of increasing it to deal with new certirorari settlements affecting the tax rate.


Should the city examine this as a remedy to pay for services that are provided the business community with revenues from property taxes, when property taxes are artificially lowered by equalization rates.  The first CSS (Commercial Services Surcharge) could be imposed in 2009-2010 to counteract the certiorari excesses of previous years — the vast amount of which have been reaped by some of the largest most successful properties in the city.


Increase City Sales Tax Another 1/4% — The Mayor has said he plans to ask Albany for the extra 1/4% in sales tax that Assemblyman Adam Bradley refused to go for in the legislature last year. Mr. Bradley balked at going for a full 1/2% as the Mayor had asked.  Should the city go for this, it would mean about $6 Million for the city. The Mayor estimates it as $10 Million, but WPCNR sees that as over optimistic. Still $6 Million is not small change. Shall we tell Mr. Bradley to go for it for White Plains?


Televise All Common Council Meetings/ Special Meetings and Work Sessions — Should the Common Council introduce a resolution to assure that all their meetings are televised or electronically available on the internet  (as they are in progressive cities like Fort Lauderdale, Florida)? (And of course provide the technology upgrades to do so?


Establish Fines for Political Action Committees’ Failure to Disclose the candidates campaigns that benefited from PAC-raised money — the Democratic Party suit agains the Year 2001 Committee to get them to disclose what candidates received their funds in the past years  is coming to a head with Judge Francis Nicolai ordering the committee to open their books (whatever that means). Should the Common Council introduce City Charter Legislation fining political action committees restrictive penalties for failure to disclose recipients  and accounts of how their money was spent for candidates up for city election — prior to election day?


Establish Relief, Marketing Plan, Credit Loosening for City Real Estate Market — Though White Plains realtors say the White Plains market is holding its own, the advantages of White Plains are now more critical than ever to point out to homebuyers. Should the city embark on a monetary relief plan to aid realtors hurt by the real estate market downturn, apply pressure on banks in the city to star credit moving out to White Plains homebuyers, and start a publicity campaign touting White Plains real estate value?

Posted in Uncategorized

Cablevision Virus Strikes White Plains Cable again on Channel 76

WPCNR WIRE. December 26, 2008: The  sketchy quality of video and hard-to-hear static audio problems that have been plaguing Cablevision public access telecasting on Channel 76 returned again Friday evening, making the audio hard to hear without the customer turning up their standard cable set to full full. Reception on Hi-Definition via Optimum was better, but hum in the audio still persisted.


Cablevision and the City of White Plains have been without an operating contract for three years, relieving Cablevision of paying an annual stipend for technical improvements to the station. Cablevision continues to pay the city per subscriber,.


 The ongoing reception problems on Cablevision  have resulted in Cablevision technical personnel making adjustments to station equipment and their own equipment for weeks, but the problem continues to persist appearing again Friday evening. Neither the Cable station nor Cablevision has been able to fix the problem.


 The Cable Commission is set to take up a contract with a vendor to rewire the station’s control board, however, other technical experts familiar with the problem believe the problem lies in what happens to the Studio signal once it is sent to Cablevision, which routes it to Mamaroneck then back up to White Plains. A young man on duty at White Plains cable Friday evening reported to WPCNR the audio and video on White Plains Week was fine going out of the station, which would indicate it is what Cablevision is doing to the Cable signal is causing the problem.It has been going on intermittently for about three years, and had gotten increasingly worse in the late fall. The muffled bass audio and very blurry video were also prevalent on the Beyond the Game program aired after 9 P.M. Friday evening.


The problem continues to persist.


White Plains Week however may be seen in its entirety with crystal clear video and sharp audio on the internet at http://www.whiteplainsweek.com.

Posted in Uncategorized

Councilpersons’ Letters to Print Media Politics: Says Mayor

WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT. From the Mayor’s Office. December 26, 2008: City Hall released a statement from Mayor Joseph Delfino this afternoon responding to  and denouncing a letter signed by Council President Benjamin Boykin and Councilman Dennis Power (picked by pundits as the Mayor’s main political rivals for Mayor next fall) and published in the Gannett chain’s Journal News this week. He dismissed their comments as playing politics and as misleading and disingenuous. The Mayor’s statement:



A Statement from Mayor Joseph Delfino.


Setting the Record Straight


A Letter written by White Plains Council President Benjamin Boykin and Councilman Dennis Power that appeared in the Journal News on December 12 attempting to justify their rejection of the Police and Fire contracts which I negotiated was misleading and disingenuous.


(More)



 


To say the contracts were negotiated without their consultation is misleading. By the City’s Charter, the Mayor is responsible for all negotiations with all unions representing City workers. In fact, The Council’s refrain from the beginning of time (particularly when they are lobbied by unions) has always been, “the Mayor negotiates contracts.”


 


Upon completion of the negotiations, the full Council was briefed on the specifics of the agreements by me, Finance Commissioner Gina Harwood, Public Safety Commissioner Frank Straub along with his two deputies, and my staff members. They were given comparables from other communities and details of how the new work schedules for Fire and Police benefit the City and the considerable concessions both unions gave which would have saved the City tens of thousands of dollars in training overtime, regular overtime and comp days. Additionally, the new contract would cost out at between two to three percent less than the current contract over its lifetime.


 


In addition, the new schedules would have provided between two to three extra police officers per shift and nearly two additional firemen – more police and firemen on the street.


 


To say that I rejected meeting with them subsequent to that briefing is downright dishonest. Council President Boykin and Councilwoman Rita Malmud requested a meeting with just the two of them to discuss issues with the contract. In return, I offered to meet in another work session with the full seven members Council so that all on the Council could be advised and informed of the issues. They declined this request.


 


In hindsight, it’s no mystery as to why they did. It’s a pattern that has become all too familiar over the past couple of years – they continue to put politics before people.


 


They site economic conditions, which they claim they have been warning about since our budget was adopted last May. At budget adoption, the Council chose – without consulting me or anyone in my administration – to reduce the proposed budget by one percent including a devastating cut to the reserve for financing. The reserve for financing line is the City’s contingency fund in times of emergencies. I said at the time that it might be the politically expedient thing to do, but that it would hurt the City. Only now are we seeing just how desperately it has.


 


They also dealt a crushing blow to the City’s finances by refusing to adopt, again for political reasons, my proposal to increase the City’s sales tax by one half percent. This increase, 90% of which would have come from people who live outside White Plains, would have only made us equal to the sales tax charged in other large cities in Westchester such as Mount Vernon, New Rochelle and Yonkers and would have relieved the burden on our City’s property tax payers. It would have provided approximately $5.6 million more in revenue each year. By stalling my original proposal for months and delaying its implementation, while they played politics, and then by cutting the increase by a quarter percent, they cost the City an estimated $9 million in a year of unprecedented financial turmoil.


 


Our police and fire fighters are extremely professional and well trained. Without increasing head count they now serve an additional 7,000 residents, the size of a village in Westchester County, deal with much taller and complex buildings and much more activity (thank God) in the downtown area both night and day. They must work harder and do more with less.


 


The recent fire in a condominium on North Broadway that was well documented in your paper showed just how professional they are. Their rapid response time and tireless effort kept what could have been a devastating disaster to a minimum of damage.


 


They deserve raises that keep pace with the rate of inflation. The proposal the Council rejected, a 3.75% increase this year and two 4% increases the following years are well below the current rate of inflation for the New York/New Region put out by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of 4.72%. Council President Boykin frequently cites the national average which is much lower. But our police and firefighters live here, in this region, not North Dakota or Tennessee. These increases are in line with those recently given in other municipalities and the County.


 


We’re entering another election year, the next 10 months will be a very telling time of whether this Council will reverse itself and put the people of White Plains ahead of their political ambitions.

Posted in Uncategorized

Budgeting by Consensus, Brainstorming, Set for Jan 15 Budget Forum.

 


WPCNR SCHOOL DAYS. December 26, 2008: In the About Our Schools newsletter circulated to all residents this week, the School District announced the format for its first ever Community Forum on the Budget, which will compose the budget in a two-step Forum process with the community. The format will consist of a brainstorming session from the community then a feedback  session that “will be used to guide the process of developing a budget which will be discussed at the second forum on February 25.


 



To kick things off at the January 15 meeting at the high school Room B-1 (which has a capacity of 200 persons. All members of the community are invited.


The newsletter reports the opening forum will begin this way: “there will be a brief review of the district’s financial situation and issues relating to development of the budget,” according to the publication. The format: “Attendees will (then) be seated in small groups and encouraged to participate in focused dialogue on spending efficiencies, areas of concern, budget priorities and creative ways to increase revenues.”


Tables will have moderators and a notetaker assigned. The newsletter does not make clear if a firm is being paid to conduct the forums, as was the case in the development of the schools’ Strategic Plan last year. As part of that plan a task force was created to focus on how additional revenues could be raised, whether they have come up with such suggestions is not known at this time.


The newsletter also notes that District administrators have begun to “prioritize areas of spending and to identify possible savings for next year’s budget, though the outgoing Superintendent of Schools, Timothy Connors has declined to commit to cutting the present rate of spending, or cut salaries in the current budget.

Posted in Uncategorized