The Governor’s State of the State Message

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. From the Governor’s Press Office. January 8, 2009: Herewith, Governor David Patterson’s State of the State Message delivered yesterday in Albany:


My Fellow New Yorkers,

For several months now, I have regularly shared with you the steps that my administration has taken to responsibly address New York’s fiscal crisis. Today, I delivered my State of the State address, giving a frank assessment of New York’s challenges, and proposing a wide-ranging series of initiatives to put our state back on the right track.

This is no time for fear. This is a time for courage. This is a time for hope. Most of all, this is a time for action.

This is a time for those of us who serve to live up to the example that New York families have set for us– to recognize that we must make painful choices about what we can and cannot afford; we must sacrifice what we want today so that we can pay for what we need tomorrow.





I am constantly inspired when I witness New Yorker’s commitment to their state, their families, and to their shared sense of responsibility and sacrifice; that commitment underlies many of the initiatives that I laid out in my speech today.

New York’s commitment to leadership demands that we meet our constitutional obligation and balance our state budget, even if that means making difficult choices. We must also stand up and encourage additional action from our leaders in Washington DC. President-Elect Obama and the Congress must act quickly to stimulate the national economy.

Today, I restated my call that Congress pass a comprehensive stimulus package for the States and to pass it by the end of January. I further call upon our federal partners to quickly reform our financial regulation system. But let me be clear – if the federal government does not act, I shall. We need sensible regulation to oversee our financial industry so that the savings and retirement funds of New Yorkers will not be at risk. 


New York’s commitment to the environment demands that we be at the forefront of one of the most ambitious clean energy goals in America. By 2015, New York will meet 45 percent of its electricity needs through improved energy efficiency and clean renewable energy. Our new “45 by 15” program will help rebuild our economy by creating an estimated 50,000 new jobs, meet our energy needs, while protecting our environment. Improving energy efficiency at schools, hospitals, and local governments will allow us to cut costs and hopefully cut taxes in the future.

New York’s commitment to innovation demands that we once again invest in roads and bridges, in higher education institutions, in statewide broadband installation and the computerization of medical records, and in clean water and wastewater systems. We should complete signature projects all across our State including the Peace Bridge, the Tappan Zee Bridge, the Second Avenue Subway, and the East Side Access. And we should implement the Ravitch Commission recommendations to improve an essential piece of our infrastructure, the MTA.

New York’s commitment to our families demands that we make it easier for families to take care of one another. That is why I proposed a bill allowing families to cover family members up to the age of 29 in their family coverage plans at their own cost. It is unacceptable that one in three New Yorkers from the ages of 19 to 29 are still uninsured. We must also aggressively address the greatest threat to our children’s health today, the obesity epidemic. First Lady Michelle Paige Paterson and I unveiled a comprehensive strategy to address this challenge, including banning trans fats in restaurants, requiring calorie posting in chain restaurants, banning junk food sales in schools, and placing a surcharge on sugared beverages like soda.

New York’s commitment to our communities demands that, even in these difficult times, we must make sure we respect one another, serve one another and protect one another. Nearly 3 million adults volunteered 397 million hours of community service last year, contributing an estimated $7 billion to our economy through their service. In these difficult times community service is more important than ever. We must fund an increase in the number and capacity of Regional Volunteer Centers throughout the state. I also encourage all New Yorkers to visit
www.newyorkersvolunteer.org to learn what they can do to serve their neighbors in need. 


Today, New York State is faced with difficult decisions. We are suffering statewide and national recessions that may continue for months or even years. We face a series of savage fiscal choices and are confronted with the worst budget deficit in the history of our state.


But we should not confuse this crisis with our long term reality, because our future is bright. Our workforce remains strong, and our vibrant university system will continue to produce high quality graduates for decades to come. We remain a center of innovation – from the stem cell research at Cornell University to the clean-tech cluster upstate to the information and nanotechnology clusters around the state. Though shaken, New York City remains a global financial capital that will eventually bounce back.

The essence of New York is that we refuse to fear the future. We understand that shared sacrifice today is the price for growth tomorrow, and that by balancing our budget and making key investments, we can prepare our state for the time when this crisis is over.

I have delivered my executive budget, and laid out my agenda for the year ahead. Now it is the time for me to listen to my colleagues and the people of New York. I encourage you to
watch my State of the State Address to learn more, and to share your thoughts with me.

It is time to come together and to take back the future of New York. I ask you to join me.

Governor David A. Paterson



Posted in Uncategorized

Library Board Back to Drawing Board. Seeks to Save Sundays, Part-Timers

WPCNR THE READING NEWS. By John F. Bailey. January 7, 2009: City Hall announced today that the White Plains Library is temporarily withdrawing its plan to close Sundays, and will look  at other methods of achieving a Mayor-mandated $60,000 in budget savings (10%) from the library between now and the end of the fiscal year June 30.


Melissa Lopez of the Mayor’s Office told WPCNR today:


 


“Paul and I spoke to Julie Trelstad from the Library Board and she informed us that the board will be meeting on January 14th to take another look at ways to cut the budget with the less impact on everyone’s lives (employees and the public) in light of the fact that Sandra Miranda made the decision to close on Sundays. The current cuts in hours and staff may or may not occur after this meeting.  We will have to wait to see what decision the board makes on the 14th. “


 


Whatever methods the Library does choose to trim their budget, Lopez said would at this time remain in effect for the new fiscal year 2009-2010.


 


 



 


Previously the Library had planned, based on a decision by Library Director, Sandra Miranda, to close Sundays which would result in the firing of 11 part-time employees.


Earlier this week, Ms. Lopez had told WPCNR that these were full-time employees required by union contract to work 5 Sundays a year, and would not lose their jobs.  Ms. Lopez today retracted this statement, acknowledging that the “Library 11” were part-time employees, and if the Library Board were to remain with the Miranda decision to close Sundays, the “Library 11” most likely would lose their jobs.


Not being full-time employees they could not be given “compensatory time” to make up for the lost hours.


Library Director Sandra Miranda told Ms. Lopez that under the plan to close Sundays, eleven Part-Time workers who staffed Sundays, who would have been terminated are currently paid as follows:



4  librarians from $22.50/hr, from 4-10 hrs/wk each


1  early childhood specialist $25/hr, 17.5 hrs/wk


4  clerks $10.75/hr, from 4-10 hrs/wk each


2  shelvers $8.75/hr, from 7-14 hrs/wk each


Ms. Lopez issued a statement from Ms. Miranda,  to WPCNR detailing the other savings Ms. Miranda said would be achieved by closing on Sundays:  “closing Sundays now gives 4 hours additional of savings on utilities during each weekend, estimated at $18,000 through June 30.”


Sunday Openings Cost Library $54,000 ($3,167 a Sunday)


WPCNR asked Ms. Lopez earlier this week, what was the cost to the library of keeping the Library open from 1 to 5 P.M. Sundays. Ms. Lopez received this statement from Ms. Miranda which Ms. Lopez shared with WPCNR:


Costs of Sundays openings (17) through end of fiscal year (June 30, 2009):
Part-time $21,450
Utilities    $18,000
Security   $10,000
Other        $ 5,000 est
Total        $54,450


Ms. Lopez said that Ms. Trelstad and her assistant had a good meeting with Paul Wood the Executive Officer at which Ms. Trelstad said the board was going to take into account actual hours of usage across the library’s 7 days of service to see where the $60,000 might be achieved.


In planning for 2009-2010, the citizen should know, as previously reported, the library is not open Sundays from June 1 through August 31, and that there are 17 Sundays from September 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, and 22 Sundays from January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010. This makes a grand total of 38 Sundays in 2009-10 at a cost of $120,046 (plus inflation).


The Miranda Decision


Ms. Lopez told WPCNR today that, although the Library Board had originally voted to close Fridays in mid-December(the least trafficked library day of the week), Ms. Miranda believed she could not extend full-time employees hours to 10 hours a day to give them their 40 hour weeks if she closed the library Fridays.


Miranda then moved to close the library Sundays, which her board objects to, according to other news reports.  Lopez said that in a meeting between Ms. Miranda,  Mr. Wood, City Executive Officer, and Mayor Joseph Delfino and Edward Dunphy, City Corporation Counsel,  Mr. Dunphy explained that by the 1993 contract, that the library was indeed able to institute a 10-hour day for full-time employees, enabling closing on Fridays without causing union problems. 


At which time, Ms. Lopez said the Mayor told Ms. Miranda it was up to her which day she wanted to close.  Lopez stressed to WPCNR the decision to close Sunday was Ms. Miranda’s.


 Are Some Part-timers are More Important Than Others?


WPCNR has asked Ms. Lopez why saving the jobs of 11 part-time library employees was more important, than preserving the jobs of the 11 part-time employees fired from the Department of Public Works  and the Department of Recreation and Parks as part of the same budget-cutting process.


(In the DPW, persons who are assigned to getting Little League fields ready in the spring will not be hired at the usual time.  In the Department of Recreation and Parks at the ice rink  those who supervised Friday night public skate nights, were let go, and one long-time employee was given a $4,000 pay cut.)


No pay cuts.


To our knowledge no mention has been made of library executives taking pay cuts in the Library budget crunch.


For that matter no city commissioners have been assessed pay cuts in the anticipated budget crunch and will not be, according to previous statements by Paul Wood, City Executive Officer.


 Ms. Lopez said the Department of Public Works and Department of Recreation and Parks stuck with their original decisions on part-time employee firings. The Department of Public Works works directly for the mayor, as does Recreation and Parks, but their employees do not have a “Board” to intervene, except for the Recreation Committee which has not taken a position on the part-time exiles.


Ms. Lopez was asked to provide the names of the library’s part-time employees up for possible termination if the Sunday closing held up. WPCNR has asked for four weeks for a list of all the actual terminations, but city hall has yet to provide the names of the part-timers.


How do you get a Part-time Job with the City?


WPCNR also asked Ms. Lopez how part-time employees get their part-time jobs, and how do they learn about them. I asked  whether the city personnel department advertises the openings publicly, on the city website, in the Journal News (the official city newspaper, just approved Monday night for another year), in churches, in city department bulletin boards, in institutions (Ys, community centers) so the general public is aware of the availabilities. Ms. Lopez said she would get the answers.


Currently, as previously reported, the library is not open Sundays from June 1 through August 31, and there are 17 Sundays from September 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, and 22 Sundays from January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010.

Posted in Uncategorized

County Approves $9.7 Million Plan to Modernize Memorial Field in Mount Vernon

WPCNR PRESS BOX. From Westchester County Board of Legislators. (Edited) January 7, 2009 UPDATED 2:11 P.M. E.S.T.: At its first regular meeting of the new year, the Board of Legislators approved a $1.3 million bond act for the design of a modernized Memorial Field on Sandford Boulevard in the City of Mount Vernon. The project, brought to the Board by County Legislator Lyndon Williams and County Executive Andy Spano, is estimated to ultimately cost $12.7 million.  The county has agreed to reimburse the city up to $9.7 million for the design and construction costs to refurbish the historic Mount Vernon sports venue.


 



The Grandstand at Mount Vernon Memorial Field on Sanford Boulevard in Mount Vernon. The scene is pre-kickoff between the White Plains Tigers and Mount Vernon Knights in 2006.


 


The improvement plan calls for the demolition of existing structures, grandstands and courts; construction of a state-of-the-art synthetic turf football/soccer field; a natural turf soccer field; grandstands for 4,000 spectators; an all-weather track; a basketball court; new buildings to house a ticket booth, concession stand, bathrooms, press box and locker rooms. All playing surfaces will be illuminated and other site improvements will include new sidewalks and landscaping. 


 


White Plains City School District recently completed two stadium renovations with artificial turf for the cost of $9.2 Million, including the architects’ fees for design.


 



Andy Spano asked the Board to approve this request under the Legacy Program.


 


“This is a prime example of what I wanted to accomplish when I originated the Legacy program back in 2001 to preserve open space and build needed recreational facilities. I am delighted that we are finally going to give the people of Mount Vernon the ball field they need and deserve. It has been a long time coming.” said Spano. “I can just imagine the excitement in the eyes of both children and adults as they take the field to play football, soccer, lacrosse, basketball or field hockey on fields that are first rate.”


 


Williams’ leadership guided the project through the legislature last year.


 


“Memorial Field has played an important part in our community’s history and has needed this overhaul for quite some time. With this refurbishment, all Mount Vernon residents, from youngsters to seniors, can look forward to enjoying a first-rate, state-of-the-art facility to exercise and showcase their great athletic talents,” said County Legislator Lyndon Williams (D-Mt. Vernon) who, as Mount Vernon’s County Legislator, has made this project a top priority since taking office in January last year.


 


Both Williams and Spano noted that getting the project to this point involved the cooperative efforts of Mount Vernon city officials as well as county’s parks, planning and public works staff. Williams thanked County’s Executive Spano’s administration and his colleagues on the Board for their steadfast commitment to improving the quality of life for Westchester’s residents through this Legacy project.


 


Mt. Vernon Mayor Clinton I. Young who served as the City of Mount Vernon’s county legislator for 12 years before being elected Mayor last year, said it was gratifying to see the project finally approved.


 


“This is a great day for people of all ages in the City of Mount Vernon,” said Young. “I have worked on this project since its inception thirteen years ago and have pushed through every delay. I’d like to thank and commend the county leaders who persevered and worked with me then as county legislator and now as Mayor to make this project, one that will be a jewel for the entire region, finally happen.” 


 


“The entire county can appreciate the tradition of Memorial Field as a great local and regional sports venue,” said County Board Chair Bill Ryan (D-IN-WF, White Plains). “I thank Mr. Williams and Mr. Young for sticking with this project and keeping it on the county’s agenda. Many generations of young people from across the county will benefit from this investment.”


 


County Legislator Ken Jenkins, Chair of the Government Operations Committee that has oversight responsibility for the county’s Parks and Recreation Department commended the efforts of both city and county officials who managed to finally pull the project together.


 


“The Board’s approval demonstrates the commitment of the county, through the Legacy Program, to serve the county’s youth by collaborating with local municipalities to improve local park and athletic facilities that would be too expensive for a local municipality to undertake alone,” said Jenkins.


                                  


The improvement plan calls for the demolition of existing structures, grandstands and courts; construction of a state-of-the-art synthetic turf football/soccer field; a natural turf soccer field; grandstands for 4,000 spectators; an all-weather track; a basketball court; new buildings to house a ticket booth, concession stand, bathrooms, press box and locker rooms. All playing surfaces will be illuminated and other site improvements will include new sidewalks and landscaping.


 


Under the agreement between the county and the city, following construction, the city will be responsible for the operation, maintenance, scheduling and security of Memorial Field at its own expense. The facility will be operated by Mount Vernon but will be available for use by all Westchester County residents.

Posted in Uncategorized

Private Aircraft Advocates:TSA Security on Light Aircraft Not Needed

WPCNR AIR NEWS. From National Business Aviation Association, Aircraft Owners Pilots Association. (EDITED) January 7, 2009: In comments made to Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officials Tuesday at Westchester County Airport, National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) President and CEO Ed Bolen articulated industry concerns about the agency’s proposed Large Aircraft Security Program (LASP) and offered a process for improving the final rule on the proposal. The Aircraft Owners Pilots Association echoed Mr. Bolen’s sentiments at the first of six hearings across the country held by the TSA to come in other venues.



A Jet Charter awaits its passengers at Westchester County Airport. Extensive new Transportation Security Administration proposed security measures applicable to private aircraft and aircraft-for-hire as light as 12,500 pounds threaten the airport extensive charter business.


At a public hearing held in a packed room at Westchester County Airport, (attendance estimated at 200 persons),  Bolen told TSA representatives their plan fails to recognize the unique needs and challenges of business aviation operations and that left unchanged, the plan would have “unintended and destructive consequences that threaten the well-being of businesses across the U.S. that rely on their airplanes for survival.”

Bolen reminded the TSA of the ongoing commitment to security that the business aviation community has demonstrated. “In the years following the 9/11 attacks,” Bolen said, “The industry20has called for security enhancements, including an Airport Watch program, monitored aircraft transactions, background checks and tamper-proof licenses for pilots. Clearly, when it comes to effective security enhancements, we have led, not followed the government.”  

According to Bolen, the security approach outlined in the agency’s LASP proposal – which is in many ways an overlay of airline security measures onto general aviation – would be unduly burdensome without providing a clear security benefit. Bolen noted four major concerns to illustrate his point:



  1. As the title for the proposal states, the TSA infers that its plan applies to large aircraft, when in fact, it would apply to aircraft as small as 12,500 lbs. “The entire cabin of a 12,500-pound airplane – from windshield to back bulkhead – could comfortably fit sideways into the planes used in the 9/11 attacks,” Bolen said. “Make no mistake about it: The ‘large aircraft’ security program will apply to some very small aircraft, and the weight threshold must be substantially changed.”


Typical 12,500-lb Gulfstream Private Aircraft on approach at Westchester County Airport. Some twin engine piston aircraft  would also be subject to the new TSA proposals.


 


2. The  proposal contains a list of more than 80 “prohibited items,” some of which may be routinely carried aboard business aircraft because they are central to NBAA Members’ business needs. “Does it really make sense for a company sending a team of employees to fix a problem with one of their assembly lines not to be able to access their tools in flight?D Bolen asked. “Does it really make sense for a sporting goods manufacturer not to be able to access their products in flight, as they try to prepare for a sales presentation?”


3. The TSA’s proposal would require owners of some airplanes to develop procedures to carry a federal air marshal when told to do so by the TSA. “It’s hard to understand why our Members would ever need a law enforcement officer aboard their plane, because the company owns the plane and knows everyone aboard,” Bolen reminded agency officials. “Knowing everything there is to know about who your passenger is changes everything, and the proposal doesn’t seem to recognize that fact.”


4. The proposal would establish a broad requirement that NBAA Members pay for external, third-party audits. “The specifics of the audits are not well-articulated,” Bolen said. “But one thing we do know is that outsourcing security is contrary to our national philosophy for use of federal screeners, and in the development of Secure Flight.”


“In determining a final rule, we believe it is important that we get this right,” Bolen said. “Overly broad or unduly burdensome regulations will needlessly destroy jobs and businesses. There is a better way to approach our shared goal of enhancing security and facilitating operations.

 

“We need to create an aviation rulemaking committee, which is a consistently proven method for a ddressing controversial proposals for our industry, because it opens up a real dialogue for creating effective, yet workable policies. Business aviation is an important industry, security is an important objective, and we deserve that kind of dialogue.”

 

Review the written testimony about the LASP proposal or listen to the podcast at http://www.nbaa.org/advocacy/testimony/20090106.php.

 

Aircraft Owners Pilots Association Speaks Out…

 

From the outset of the hearing , the TSA panel members stated that they were there to listen. Except to answer three very specific questions, they did not respond to participants’ comments.


AOPA Northeast Regional Representative Craig Dotlo told the TSA that AOPA has some significant concerns with the proposed rule: It outsources what should be an inherently governmental function—security oversight; it applies commercial standards to general aviation; and, its weight threshold captures very small aircraft, especially when compared to the aircraft used in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.




TSA hears from law enforcement authority


While AOPA plans to file formal written comments on the proposed rule, the association took advantage of the Jan. 6 public hearing to let the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) hear from a fellow law enforcement authority.


AOPA Northeast Regional Representative Craig Dotlo managed the FBI’s White Plains Field Office and was responsible for reviewing critical infrastructure facilities, including Westchester County Airport and Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant, in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.


“While the government must take every reasonable precaution to protect the homeland, it is recognized by most experts that it is virtually impossible to protect an open democracy with 10,000 miles of borders against every conceivable attack on bridges, tunnels, airports, nuclear power plants, chemical facilities, dams, and the list goes on,” Dotlo said at the hearing. “The real key to homeland security is a robust, efficacious, and sophisticated intelligence network that can identify prospective terrorist attacks and prevent them from occurring.”


AOPA Rep speaks


As Andy Cebula, AOPA executive vice president of government affairs, noted, “It is absolutely vital that security officials hear directly from GA users, as they did at today’s public hearing. But it is equally important that they hear from people like Craig who are knowledgeable in both aviation and security and regulatory issues.”


“AOPA is concerned with the weight threshold that is used for the basis of the regulations and provisions in the rule that outsource security oversight to a third-party auditor,” Dotlo told the panel. “AOPA does not support the NPRM as currently drafted and requests that TSA reconsider the proposed rules, focusing particularly on whether there are less costly and less intrusive ways of enhancing general aviation security.”


The association is also concerned that the program could be applied to all aircraft and all airports in the future.


Speaker after speaker reiterated AOPA’s main points and NBAA’s call for an aviation rulemaking committee.


Other speaker comments included one person who said the TSA seems to be reversing its earlier posture that there is no one-size-fits-all security solution for general aviation. Another said that the TSA had not yet proven, at least publicly, that a credible terrorist threat exists from corporate aviation. And a third worried that such a large expansion of the fleet under the TSA’s oversight would dilute security resources.


“Whether it’s through an aviation rulemaking committee or some other mechanism, AOPA remains committed to working with the TSA to enhance general aviation security in the way that is least burdensome to our members,” said Craig Spence, AOPA vice president of aviation security. “AOPA will attend all of the remaining public meetings and will file more extensive written comments. We urge members to consider doing the same. You can check the AOPA member action center for more information on filing formal comments.”

Posted in Uncategorized