Somebody’s Polling Me. I Wonder Who?

 


WPCNR BACKROOM BULLETIN. By John F. Bailey. February 16, 2009: The calls are going out. Pointed, probing telephone polls with questions  of White Plains voters asking residents how they feel about four key White Plains personalities, positive or negative are being conducted this past weekend.


 


The personalities are Adam Bradley, the assemblyman who is officially undecided about running for Mayor of White Plains; Bill Ryan, the Chair of the County Board of Legislators, viewed as perhaps hurt politically by his touting raises for himself and county legislators, and for tolerating Gary Kriss, the dismissed former spokesperson for the County Board of Legislators and assistant to Mr. Ryan, and Andrew Spano the  Westchester County Executive, and one non-Democrat, the three term Mayor of White Plains Joseph Delfino.


 


Conspicuous by their absence from the poll are Benjamin Boykin, Thomas Roach and Rita Malmud and Glen Hockley, Common Councilpersons with extensive experience on the council.


 



County Executive Andy Spano February 2009 — Performance Being Polled


 



Chair of the Board of Legislators, White Plains’ Bill Ryan — Performance Ratings Sought.


 



Assemblyman Adam Bradley of White Plains — Approval Ratings Asked.


 



The Target? Or a Challenger for Andy Spano:  Mayor Joseph Delfino of White Plains — Rating of the Mayor’s Performance Being Asked for. Asked Monday if the Mayor had ruled out a run for County Executive, Mayor Delfino in a statement to WPCNR said , “He had not ruled it out.”


 


 


 


 


 


According to persons who have received these calls, the questions asked them asked “my feelings toward” each of the political personalities  “positive or negative” in terms of a percentage.


 


In addition, the poll, our correspondents said asked their opinion of the White Plains Common Council “as a whole” “positive or negative” in terms of a percentage.


 


And finally, the poll asked the pollee their “attitude toward development,” whether development had been based on “good planning”  and whether or not they felt developers had “gotten too many” breaks.


 


The poll appears to be testing the waters perhaps by the undecided  Mr. Ryan and the undecided Mr. Bradley, about the vulnerability of Mr. Delfino among Democratic voters, though it is unclear whether voters of both parties are being polled. Nevertheless the calls are going out. 


 


 The poll also asked pollees  to rate  the Common Council performance.


 



The popular Tom Roach — voter ratings of him not sought in poll.


 



The Council President, Benjamin Boykin, ten years on the Council — His popularity not sought by poll.


 



Rita Malmud, twenty years of Council experience — Voter Rating Not Polled.


 


Benjamin Boykin, and Tom Roach, two possible Democratic Mayoral candidates from the Common Council ranks may be being tested here by this Common Council question. 


 


Roach, with eight years on the council,  Boykin with ten  years on the council, and Rita Malmud, a councilperson with twenty years  of experience behind the Common Council ballustrades not even being asked for ratings among voters is curious. If this is a Mayor poll testing the waters for Ryan and Bradley, if I were Mr. Boykin, Mr. Roach, and Mrs. Malmud I’d be miffed.


 



Glen Hockley Seven Years Experience on Council — Not Analyzed by Poll


 


More interesting is why the Democrats, if this is a Democrat-sponsored poll, would not get a bead on the Hockley strength.  They may be lulled into a false sense of security by their recent primary drubbing of Mr. Hockley in the District Leader challenge primary last September.


 


If Hockley should wrangle nomination for say County Legislator running against Mr. Ryan, or running for Mayor on the Working Families Ticket, or for his Council Seat as a Working Families Party or Republican candidate, he could draw votes from the Democrat Mayoral nominee. The Democrats should remember when Nick Beilenson lost to Mayor Alfred Del Vecchio when Michael Keating split the Democratic vote.


 


Development only issue polled.


 


 


There are three questions of the development issue — seeming to get at whether running anti-development is a major issue of substance in the city. What is surprising is there is no question on city finances or city property taxes. 


 


One question asks the pollees What is your attitude about developoment in the city. That is followed up by a question as to whether the city development had “good planning” and how the pollee feels about how the city was developed. 


 


 


At this point it is unclear who is funding this extensive poll whether it is the County Democratic Party, or the Democratic City Committee, the County Republican Committee, or perhaps Mr. Boykin, or even the loan wolf of the Common Council, Glen Hockley, whose desire to become the Mayor is well known, though Mr. Hockley is not mentioned in the survey.


 


The Mayor’s Office said Monday that Mayor Delfino and none of his supporting organizations were conducting this poll.


 


Paul Schwarz of the White Plains City Democratic Committee said his Committee was not paying for the poll.


 


 

Posted in Uncategorized

Governor Details $24 Billion in Stimulus for NY

WPCNR ALBANY ROUNDS. From The Governor’s Press Office. February  16, 2009 Governor David A. Paterson announced Saturday that a preliminary analysis of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act shows New York can expect to receive at least $24.6 billion over the next two years. This critical legislation will provide significant funding for State fiscal relief, as well as for education aid, infrastructure projects, direct benefits to low income and unemployed New Yorkers, and other critical priorities.


“With New York State at the epicenter of a nationwide financial crisis, I have been working for months with governors around the country advocating for federal aid to help states weather the current economic storm,” said Governor Paterson.  “I am grateful to Speaker Pelosi, Majority Leader Reid, Senator Schumer, Senator Gillibrand, Congressman Rangel and the entire New York Congressional Delegation for taking swift action on President Obama’s economic recovery agenda.


 



“However, this funding does not absolve us of our responsibility at the state level to bring spending in line with what our government can afford over the long term,” Governor Paterson continued. “We still have to address a $13 billion deficit next year and a multi-year deficit of over $48 billion. Most of these recovery funds will be spent within two years, in some instances, sooner. Therefore, this federal stimulus legislation does not in any way diminish the need to reevaluate our operations and produce a smarter, less costly, more efficient government.”


Governor Paterson this week created the New York State Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Cabinet to manage the development of State and local infrastructure projects financed through these federal funds. The cabinet will be composed of State agency heads and senior members of the Governor’s staff, and will work closely with local governments to ensure federal dollars reach critical projects and put people to work as quickly as possible.


Senior Advisor for Infrastructure and Transportation Timothy J. Gilchrist, who leads the Cabinet, said: “These funds will allow critical infrastructure projects to progress at a time when state and local governments cannot move these projects forward alone. Now we must work with local officials to outline an aggressive agenda to ensure that the State utilizes these funds quickly and efficiently, for job-creating projects with lasting value across the State.”


National Overview


Overall, the national cost of the provisions included in the legislation is expected to total $789 billion. This includes approximately $463 billion in spending and $326 billion in tax cuts. Of the $463 billion in spending, $374 billion is for programs that directly impact our State.  New York is expect to receive $24.6 billion of that funding.  


State and Local Fiscal Relief


Several portions of the federal stimulus legislation will provide direct fiscal relief to State and local governments, many of which are addressing significant budget deficits. Some of these major provisions include the following:


Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAP)


The stimulus bill provides a total of $87 billion in fiscal relief through increased Medicaid reimbursements (FMAP). New York’s share of that funding (which includes funding for the State, counties, and the City of New York) is nearly $11 billion over a 27-month period – $1.9 billion in 2008-09, $5.0 billion in 2009-10, and $4.2 billion in 2010-11.


Based on preliminary analysis, it is expected that approximately 70 percent of this relief will accrue to the State and the remainder will be provided to local governments.


Education


The legislation includes a State fiscal stabilization fund that totals $53.6 billion over two years, which primarily consists of funding for education.


There are three main components of this fund.



  • Education Restorations.  New York is expected to receive $2.5 billion out of a total of $39.5 billion that will be provided to restore proposed reductions in funding for education. The federal legislation requires that this money be used for that purpose.  It is expected that half of the $2.5 billion will be committed in 2009-10 and the remainder in 2010-11.


  • Flexible Relief.  New York is expected to receive $556 million out of a national total of $8.8 billion provided for other fiscal relief to state governments over the next two years. Like FMAP, this funding would be flexible and can be dedicated to support any government service.

 



  • Incentive Grants.  An additional $5 billion in education grants will be available for states meeting key performance measures as determined by the United States Department of Education. While the amount New York would receive is subject to the grant awarding process, we expect that New York will be in a strong competitive position to receive substantial funding.

 


Other Education Funding


New York is expected to receive $940 million out of a total of $13 billion in Title I funding for high needs students and $760 million out of a total of $12.2 billion in IDEA funding for special education over the next two years.  Both of these funds would be split roughly evenly between the next two fiscal years. This funding will be provided directly to school districts through the State Education Department subject to specific federal formulas over which the State has no discretion.


Other major education funding for New York includes increasing the maximum award for Pell Grants by $500 (National Share: $15.6 billion, State Share: $180 million), and providing substantial increased support for education technology (National Share: $650 million, State Share: $61 million) and the education of homeless children (National Share: $70 million, State Share: $7 million).


Infrastructure and Energy


The stimulus legislation delivers substantial support for infrastructure projects. At the national level, this includes $48 billion in funding for transportation capital projects ($8.4 billion for mass transit, $27.5 billion for highways and bridges, $9.3 billion for rail, $1.3 billion for airport improvement projects; $1.5 billion for discretionary surface transportation projects). Of this total, New York is expected to receive at least $1.25 billion for the mass transit and $1.1 billion for highways and bridges. The Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Cabinet will be working with State agencies and local governments to aggressively seek funding from other sources of transportation funding.


The legislation also includes $16.8 billion for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects and technologies, including research and development. New York will receive $126 million through the State Energy Program and $31 million in alternative energy block grants. It provides $4.5 billion for energy research and development projects nationwide, including $2.0 billion for energy storage technologies, which could provide funding for the Governor’s proposed battery storage consortium. 


New York State is also projected to receive $435 million from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund; $85 million from the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund; and $404 million to help weatherize the homes of low-income individual.


Other Major Spending Provisions


The federal legislation will also provide funding for a number of other critical initiatives over the next two years. New York is expected to receive $1.3 billion in enhanced food stamp benefits; $1.3 billion to fund 33-week expansion of unemployment benefits (to a total of 59 weeks), as well as provide additional weekly benefits through December 31, 2009 instead of March 31, 2009; and $100 million for child care services for low-income individuals.


In addition the federal legislation provides funding for several programs that will be administered at the federal level.  The Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Cabinet is analyzing the legislation to identify programs that the State and local governments can take apply for funding.

Posted in Uncategorized

Photograph of the Day

WPCNR PHOTOGRAPH OF THE DAY By the WPCNR Roving Photographer. February 16, 2009: Today’s shot highlights frostbite sailors off the entrance of Mamaroneck Harbor Sunday afternoon.


Posted in Uncategorized

Mayor to Brief Council on State of Exchequer. No Union layoffs w/o Consent

WPCNR CITY HALL CIRCUIT. February 14, 2009: In response to repeated inquiries about specific cuts department-by-department in White Plains, rumors of job cuts, and rumors of city hall closings, the Mayor’s Office issued a statement to WPCNR Friday evening declaring that a briefing on the state of the city finances would be given to the Common Council next Thursday evening, February 19.


The statement from Melissa Lopez, the Mayor’s media spokesperson reads: ” (at) the Common Council meeting on Feb 19 the council will be updated on all budget concerns.

He (Paul Wood, City Executive Officer,  also said that, “legaly, contractually, we cannot cut union jobs mid year without an agreement from the unions.”

Mayor Delfino wants to preserve jobs not make cuts so we are continuing to speak to the unions about various alternatives that cannot be disclosed right now.”


At the Council of Neighborhood Associations meeting this week, Augie Zicca, reporting on the state of the Department of Public Safety told delegates present that the firefighters loved their new 24-hour shifts, there had been no absentees, and no overtime. He also told the CNA, the department was a full strength and that there would be no layoffs.   


The city has been working on cutting the city budget since early December, but has not issued a specific overview of all cuts and savings, though noting cuts of approximately 25 part-time personnel at the White Plains Library, the Department of Recreation and Parks and the Department of Public Works. This week the annual Camp Chill camp for ice-skaters at Ebersole Rink was not held, apparently because of budget cuts at the Department of Recreation and Parks, despite earlier reports that no programs would be cut as a result of the layoffs.

Posted in Uncategorized